Life Care Center Of Crossville

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 154 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 82.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 79.4 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, hospital record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent a fall for 1 resident (Resident #8) of 5 residents reviewed for falls. The facility's failure resulted in actual HARM to Resident #8 when the resident was receiving care by facility staff and allowed to fall to the floor from the bed, resulting in injury. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Area of Focus: Fall Management, reviewed 12/4/2023, revealed .To promote patient safety and reduce patient falls .the facility must ensure that .each resident receives adequate supervision .to prevent falls . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Dominant Side, Diabetes, Long Term use of Anticoagulants, and Functional Quadriplegia. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, medical record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to accurately assess residents on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) with a serious mental illness for 2 residents (Residents #39 and #47) of 18 residents reviewed. The findings include:Review of the RAI 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/2025, revealed .PASRR [PASARR] Level II screening determined that the resident has a serious mental illness .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Major Depressive Disorder, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions, Hallucinations, and Anxiety Disorder. Further review revealed the diagnosis of Dementia was added 11/12/2024.Review of an PASARR dated 11/10/2022, revealed Resident #39 required a Level II evaluation, which was completed on 11/16/2022, and determined the resident had a serious mental illness.Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to obtain a Physician's Order prior to implementing a continuous blood glucose monitoring device and failed to incorporate the continuous blood glucose monitoring device on the comprehensive care plan for 1 resident (Resident #17) of 3 residents reviewed for insulin use.The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Glucose monitoring, continuous, dated 5/19/2025, revealed .A real-time continuous glucose monitor consists of three components: a sensor, a small wire catheter or needle that's inserted in the arm .and a handheld receiver .that displays the glucose data .calibrate the transmitter or reader if specified by the device manufacturer .Implementation .Verify the practitioner's order .replace the sensor at an interval established by the device manufacturer .document the procedure .includes results of glucose monitoring, assessment of the patients ability to perform glucose monitoring, manual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, meal tray ticket review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adaptive devices while eating as ordered by the physician for 1 resident (Resident #10) of 3 residents reviewed for adaptive devices.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Assistive Devices - Special Eating Equipment, dated 12/16/2021, revealed .The facility must provide appropriate assistive devices to residents who need them to maintain or improve their ability to eat or drink independently .when special equipment is recommended, the Interdisciplinary Care Plan, [meal] tray card and resident diet profile are updated .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, Dysphagia, Osteoarthritis, and Adult Failure to Thrive.Review of an Occupational Therapist's progress note dated 10/30/2024, revealed .ordered for dycem [non-skid mat] and plate guard…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-04 · tag F0849 — widespread
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility contract review, facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care with the hospice provider was available in the medical record for 4 residents (Resident #6, #19, #21, and #44) of 4 residents reviewed for hospice services. The findings include: Review of the facility's hospice contract titled, Hospice Services Agreement, dated 7/19/2021, revealed .Hospice Plan of Care .written care plan .reviewed at intervals by the Interdisciplinary Group .Hospice shall furnish facility with copy of .Plan of Care . Review of the facility's policy titled, Hospice Coordination of Care, for Resident dated 9/6/2024, revealed .provides hospice .resident's written plan of care includes the most recent hospice plan of care .obtain the following information from .hospice .most recent plan of care to each resident . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to resubmit a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) (PASRR) timely after a new mental health diagnosis for 1 resident (Resident #14) of 7 residents reviewed for PASRR. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) [PASRR], revised on 10/6/2022 and reviewed on 9/26/2024, revealed .A facility must coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program .Coordination includes .Referring all level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment .A nursing facility must notify the state mental health authority or state intellectual disability authority .promptly after a significant change in the mental or physical condition of a resident who has…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were properly contained in 2 of 3 dumpsters (dumpsters A and B). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Disposal of Garbage and Refuse, dated 9/8/2022, revealed .all waste is properly contained in the dumpsters .and are covered appropriately .all areas where garbage/refuse is located is kept clean . During an observation of the outside dumpster area on 12/2/2024 at 10:40 AM, with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), revealed 3 dumpsters for waste disposal. Further observation revealed dumpsters A and B had no drain plugs intact, which left a golf-ball sized opening to the bottom corner of the dumpsters. The missing dumpster plug from dumpster A and B resulted in the dumpsters' contents being left open to the elements and the potential exposure to pests. During an interview on 12/2/2024 at 10:55 AM, the CDM confirmed the drain plugs for dumpsters A and B were not intact and the dumpsters' contents were not contained properly.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an assessment for potential contraindications to influenza vaccines were documented in the medical record for 4 residents (Resident #8, #12, #16, and #28) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Influenza Vaccine Policy for Residents, dated 9/24/2024, revealed .Medical contraindication refers to a condition or risk that precludes the administration of a treatment or intervention because of the substantial probability that harm to the individual may occur .Procedure .The resident is assessed for possible contraindications .assessment findings .are documented in the resident's medical record . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, Diabetes, and Dementia. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 consented to the administration of the Influenza…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to offer hand hygiene assistance to residents prior to meals for 3 residents (Residents #8, #23, and #16) of 3 residents observed on 2 of 4 hallways observed for meal tray distribution. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) and Plan, revised on 6/13/2024, revealed .The facility must establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections .residents should be advised of the IPCP's standards, policies and procedures regarding hand hygiene before eating . Review of the facility's policy titled, Feeding a Resident, reviewed on 9/10/2024, revealed .The facility will ensure that .A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services .Assist resident with .hand…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to dignity when an indwelling catheter drainage bag was left uncovered and visible to the public for 1 resident (Resident #23) of 78 residents observed for dignity. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Dignity, dated 5/6/2019, revealed .All residents will be treated with dignity and respect. Examples of treating residents with dignity and respect include .Refraining from practices demeaning to residents, such as leaving urinary catheter bags uncovered . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including Disorder of Kidney and Ureter. Review of a comprehensive care plan for Resident #23 dated 11/5/2024, revealed .resident has an Indwelling Catheter r/t [related to] obstruction . Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #23 scored 0 on the Brief Interview for Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an expired medication was not available for resident use in 1 of 4 medication carts observed for medication storage which had the potential to affect 1 resident (Resident #48) of 19 residents reviewed for insulin use. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Delivery & Storage of Medications and Supplies, revised [DATE], revealed .to be performed by licensed nurses .expiration dates will be checked . Review of the facility's policy titled, Guidance for Using Insulin Products, dated 2023, revealed .before using, insulin should be checked .storage recommendations for injectable diabetes medications .insulin lispro [Humalog] [an injectable medication used to lower blood sugar levels] .discard after .28 days . During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 8:05 AM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A, revealed the medication cart for [NAME] hall had one injectable medication (insulin lispro) for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

$8,824 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-08-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN