Life Care Center Of Old Hickory Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 407 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 89.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 96.3 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 4 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, and interview, the facility failed to identify accident hazards to prevent falls and failed to ensure safety during care for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition, was dependent upon staff for assistance with transfers, and used a wheelchair for mobility. On 4/4/2025, Resident #1 had an unwitnessed fall. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) O discovered Resident #1 on the floor with her right arm lodged in the wheel of the wheelchair. CNA O pulled Resident #1's right arm out of the wheel and Resident #1 sustained a large avulsion wound (a traumatic injury where the skin and other underlying tissues are torn away from the body, can cause heavy bleeding and require immediate medical care) to the right arm that required a hospital transfer and surgical repair, which resulted in actual HARM to Resident #1. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to facilitate the residents' and/or resident representatives' participation in the care planning process for 3 of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #3 and Resident #4) sampled residents reviewed for care planning conferences. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans and Conferences, dated 8/29/2025, revealed .The facility will ensure the timeliness of each resident's person-centered, comprehensive care plan, and to ensure that the comprehensive care plan is reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team composed of individuals who have knowledge of the resident and his/her needs, and that each resident representative.in developing the care plan and making decisions about his or her care.The facility has a responsibility to assist residents to engage in the care planning process.holding care planning meetings at the time of day when the resident is functioning best.encouraging a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the Care Plan for 2 of 6 (Residents #2 and #3) residents reviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans and Revisions, dated 3/2/2022, revealed, The facility will ensure the timeliness of each resident's person-centered, comprehensive care plan, and to ensure that the comprehensive care plan is reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team .The facility should monitor the resident over time to help identify changes in the resident condition that may warrant an update to the person-centered plan of care . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged home on 7/26/2023, and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Encounter for Orthopedic Aftercare Following Surgical Amputation, Acute Osteomyelitis Left Ankle and Foot, Cellulitis of Left Lower Limb, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for 1 of 6 (Resident #2) residents reviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged home on 7/26/2023, and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Encounter for Orthopedic Aftercare Following Surgical Amputation, Acute Osteomyelitis Left Ankle and Foot, Cellulitis of Left Lower Limb, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia, and Peripheral Vascular Disease. Review of the notes from the Infectious Disease physician's office visit for Resident #2 dated 6/22/2023, revealed, .Chronic ulcer of toes of left foot .should perform 3/x [times] week dressing changes and apply [named Hydrophobic microbe binding wound contact layer] to the would bed ulcer . Review of the Wound Observation Tools for Resident #2 revealed there were no wound assessments documented until 7/18/2023, which stated, .left foot .First observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-09-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines to minimize the risk of potential exposure to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) for 75 residents. The facility also failed to properly dispose of a urinary catheter drainage system in a manner to prevent transmission of potential infectious agents for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #54) requiring a urinary catheter. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Coronavirus (COVID 19) (SARS-CoV-2) revised 9/6/2022, revealed, .to minimize the risk of potential exposure to the Coronavirus .All recommended COVID-19 PPE [Personal Protective Equipment] should be worn during care of residents under quarantine, which includes use of an N95 or higher-level respirator . Observation of #206's bathroom and interview on 9/12/2022 at 12:15 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 was wearing a KN95 (type of face covering made in China, not approved by NIOSH [National Institute of Occupational…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dignity for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #30) who required an indwelling urinary catheter. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 5/6/2021, revealed, .The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility . Review of the facility's policy titled, Indwelling Urinary Catheter (Foley) Management, dated 8/22/2022, revealed, .The facility will ensure that residents admitted with urinary catheter, .the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region Stage 4 and Infection and Inflammatory Reaction due to Indwelling Urethral Catheter. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-14 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a new Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screen was completed after an identified mental health diagnosis for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #16 And Resident #82) reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pre-admission SCREENING and RESIDENT REVIEW [PASARR], dated 8/7/2021 revealed, .[PASARR] is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care .the facility is required to notify the appropriate state mental health authority or state intellectual disability authority when a resident with a mental disorder [MD] or intellectual disability [ID] has a significant change in their physical or mental condition . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #16 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Anxiety and Major Depressive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, documentation review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident #30) reviewed. The findings include: Review of facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), dated 8/22/2022, revealed, . Assist resident with bed/wheelchair repositioning as necessary to promote good body alignment and prevent skin breakdown . Review of the undated facility documentation titled, Area of Focus: Basic Skin Management, revealed, .All residents have preventive measures in place that include pressure redistribution mattresses on all beds, wheelchair cushion, heel boots or suspension if needed, frequent repositioning per CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] and ADL care, incontinent care provided with skin cleansers/wipes and barrier cream application if needed . Review of facility's policy titled, Skin Integrity & Pressure Ulcer/Injury Prevention and Management, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident #589) reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Physician Orders, revised 3/17/2022, revealed .A physician, physician assistant or nurse practitioner must provide orders for the resident's immediate care and ongoing care of the resident. The facility is obligated to follow and carry out the orders of the prescriber in accordance with all applicable and federal guideline .Physician orders include the following .Medication and Treatment . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #589 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Respiratory Failure and Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Review of the current Order Summary Report for Resident #589 revealed, .9/11/2022 Oxygen at 2 liters/minute continuously per nasal cannula. Document every shift for chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to label oxygen tubing when changed for 1 of 10 sampled residents (Resident #589) reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration/Safety/Storage/Maintenance, revised 8/2/2021, revealed, .Change oxygen supplies weekly and when visibly soiled. Equipment should be labeled with patient name and dated when setup or changed . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #589 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Respiratory Failure and Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Review of the current Order Summary Report for Resident #589 revealed an order to change oxygen tubing every Sunday night. Observations in Resident #589's room on 9/13/2022 at 8:30 AM, revealed the oxygen cannula tubing was not labeled or dated. Observation and interview in Resident #589's room on 9/13/2022 at 9:52 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on facility documentation review and interview the facility failed to ensure there was a Registered Nurse (RN) on duty for 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for the 18 months reviewed. The findings include: Review of the daily staffing sheets from 3/1/2021-9/13/2022, revealed the following days 6/18/2021, 7/12/2021, 7/16/2021, 7/17/2021, 7/26/2021, 7/31/2021, 8/1/2021, 7/30/2021, 8/5/2021, 8/9/2021, 8/10/2021, 8/17/2021, 8/18/2021, 8/19/2021, 8/28/2021, 8/29/2021, 10/1/2021, 10/8/2021, 10/9/2021, 10/10/2021, 10/18/2021, 10/19/2021, 10/23/2021, 10/24/2021, 11/19/2021, 12/31/2021, 6/18/2022, and 7/2/2022 without 8 consecutive hours of RN coverage. During an interview on 9/13/2022 at 9:24 AM, Executive Director confirmed facility should have 8 hours of RN coverage.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,788 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,788 — penalty dated 2025-10-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN