Wooldridge Place Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 111 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 68.0 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received adequate supervision while Resident #1 was unaccounted for approximately 15 minutes from 6:00 PM to 6:15 PM on 10/07/24 before a 3rd party called to notify the facility that Resident #1 was walking through a field adjacent to the facility. On 10/18/24 at 2:27 PM, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 10/19/24 at 1:25 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's continuing to monitor the implementation and evaluate the effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure could place residents requiring supervision at risk for injury and accidents with potential for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for NPO status. The facility failed to intervene timely and appropriately when Resident #2 obtainted food and began to choke. On 3/25/2024, during lunch service about 12:00 p.m., Resident #2 obtained access to Resident #1's food, staff did not provide timely interventions which led to Resident #2 choking and expiring. Resident #2 had a g-tube and was on NPO status. An IJ was identified on 03/28/24. The IJ templates were provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:30 PM. While the IJ was removed on 3/30/24 at 7:18PM. The facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place. This failure could place residents at risk of choking or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for NPO status. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was adequately supervised while eating lunch. On 3/25/2024, during lunch service about 12:00 p.m., CNA D did not ensure adequate supervision of Resident #1 while eating. Resident #2 obtained access to Resident #1's food, choked and died. Resident #2 had a g-tube and was on NPO status. An IJ was identified on 03/28/24. The IJ templates were provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:30 PM. While the IJ was removed on 3/30/24 at 7:18PM. The facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place. This failure could place residents at risk of choking or death. Findings included: Record review on 3/26/24 of self-reported incident report…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors for two of 5 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for medication errors. 1. The facility failed to hold Resident #1's midodrine (medication that raises blood pressure) when Resident #1's blood pressure was outside of physician's parameters on 06/01/26 and 06/11/26. 2. The facility failed to administer Resident #2's midodrine when Resident #2's blood pressure was inside of physician's parameters on 06/05/26. These failures could place residents at risk for complications such as increased blood pressure, decreased blood pressure, exacerbation of symptoms, and potential hospitalization.The findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/16/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 05/15/26 and a current admission date of 02/01/26. Resident #1's pertinent diagnosis included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (years of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for documentation. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 5's medication orders were complete and accurate on 1 occasion for June 10, 2026. This failure could place residents at risk for errors in care and treatment and not receiving the services needed to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical well-being. The findings included: Record review of Resident # 5's face sheet dated 06/16/26 indicated a [AGE] year-old-female with an original admission date of 05/09/26 and a readmission date of 06/09/26 with the diagnoses of Joint Replacement Surgery (replacement of damaged or arthritic joint surfaces with artificial implants), Rheumatoid Arthritis ( a chronic autoimmune disease where the immune system mistakenly attacks the lining of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a comprehensive prevention and control program that included employing proper signage on the doors of resident's room to prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to place a readily visible EBP sign outside the room of Resident's #4 who had an active order for EBP. This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination, infection, and illness.The findings include: Record review of Resident's #4's face sheet dated 06/17/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 01/11/24 and a readmission date of 05/11/26. Pertinent diagnoses include End Stage Renal Disease (the final stage of chronic kidney disease), Acute Pyelonephritis (a sudden, severe bacterial infection of the kidneys) and Pyelitis Cystica (a benign, chronic condition of the urinary tract characterized by the formation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #5) of 5 residents whose care plans were reviewed. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan addressed her sexual relationship with Resident #5. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's care plan addressed his sexual relationship with Resident #1. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services, and the implementation of personalized plan of care developed to address their specific needs. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission record on 05/28/26 reflected an [AGE] year-old female resident initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with most recent admission on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive, incurable lung disease that causes inflammation and difficulty breathing),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 5 of 8 (Resident #82, Resident #21 , Resident #53 , Resident #32, and Resident #1) residents reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #82's oxygen was administered at the correct setting of 3 liters per minute on 2/24/2026 as ordered by the physician. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #21's oxygen was administered at the correct setting of 2 liters per minute on 2/24/2026 as ordered by the physician. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #53's oxygen was administered at the correct setting of 4 liters per minute on 2/24/2026 as ordered by the physician. 4. The facility failed to post an Oxygen sign indicating Resident #32 received oxygen on 2/24/2026. 5. The facility failed to ensure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8's blood pressures were assessed prior to administering Lisinopril (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) per the prescribed order and blood pressure parameters in February of 2026. This failure could have placed residents at risk for complications and jeopardize their health and safety.The findings Included: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet, dated 02/26/2026, revealed an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 02/05/2026 and a discharge date of 02/25/2026. Pertinent diagnosis included Essential Primary Hypertension (high blood pressure).Record review of Resident #8's physician orders, started 02/07/2026, revealed an order for Lisinopril 40 MG, give one tablet by mouth daily for Hypertension. Hold for blood pressure less than 110/60 and/or pulse less than…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored appropriately for 3 of 4 medication carts (100 Hall Nurse Med-Cart and 200/400 Hall and 300 Hall Medication Carts) reviewed for labeling and storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure the 100 Hall Nurse Med-Cart was locked and secured. 2. The OTC medications in the 200/400 Hall and 300 Hall Medication Carts did not have an open date written on the liquid and powder bottles. 3. The facility failed to ensure a (diabetic) lancet, sitting on top the unattended 200 hall medication cart, was used. These failures could have placed residents at risk of gaining access to unlocked medications which were not prescribed to them and could have caused them harm and not receiving the therapeutic effects of the medication and could place residents at risk of access or injury to a lancet. The findings included: 1.An observation on 02/26/2026 at 2:41 PM of the 100 Hall Nurse Med-Cart belonging to LVN-A parked at the nurses' station revealed an unlocked medication cart.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation. The facility failed to properly label and date open, shelf stable food.The facility failed to dispose of expired shelf stable and refrigerated food.The facility failed to ensure boxes containing jugs of water were not on the floor.The facility failed to clean the filters on the ice machine.The facility failed to sweep, mop, and clean the floors and counters in the kitchen. The facility failed to ensure the refrigerators, as well as the trays inside the refrigerators, were clean. The facility failed to ensure the juice dispenser was clean. The facility failed to ensure the utensil drawer was clean. The facility failed to ensure under the sink and dishwasher were clean.These failures could have placed residents at risk of foodborne illnesses, as well as placed staff at risk for falls and injuriesThe findings included:Observations and initial tour of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to personal privacy during medical treatment for 3 (Resident #15, Resident #82, and Resident #21) of 5 Residents reviewed for Privacy. The facility failed to ensure MA E closed the door or the curtain during medication administration for Resident #15 and Resident #82 on 02/25/2026. The facility failed to ensure LVN F closed the door, the curtain or the blinds during medication administration via gastrostomy tube for Resident #21 on 02/25/2026. These failures could place the residents at risk of not having their personal privacy maintained during medical treatment.The Findings included: During an observation on 02/25/2026 at 6:49 a.m., MA E kept the door and the curtain open while checking Resident #15's blood pressure. She then proceeded to administer his medications. During an observation on 02/25/2026 at 7:06 a.m., MA E kept the door and the curtain open while checking Resident #82's blood pressure. She then proceeded to administer his medications. During an observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to send a copy of the residents ' discharge notice, including the reason for transfer or discharge, prior to discharge, to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for notifying the LTC Ombudsman of the residents ' discharge. Resident #3 was discharged home on [DATE] without a notice to the LTC state ombudsman. These failures could place residents at risk of not knowing their rights and receiving the services of the state LTC Ombudsman.Findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #3 ' s admission record dated 02/26/26 with an admission date 1/26/26 revealed Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses of Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (lungs cannot supply oxygen to blood), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications (high blood sugar levels), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from lungs), Essential (Primary)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$90,880 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $77,253 — penalty dated 2024-10-27
• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-03-30
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-30 for 20 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $883K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX