Garden Terrace Healthcare Center Of Federal Way
491 South 338th Street, Federal Way, WA 98003 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 70 certified beds · (253) 661-2226 Medicare only — no Medicaid
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.1% | 82.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.0% | 19.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.3% | 13.4% | 12.0% | worse |
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
70.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 564 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 69.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 209 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 70.5%CMS range 67.0–74.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 7.8–12.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 69.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 59.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 91.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 4.2–7.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 62.2 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.52 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.93 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.79 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.67 to 1.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and treatment in accordance with their assessed needs and professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for bowel care. The failure to assess a resident's change in condition, address identified signs and symptoms of distress, and notify the physician when residents present with diarrhea (multiple episodes of loose bowel movement) placed residents at risk for nutrition and hydration problems and a decreased quality of life.Findings included.<Resident 1>According to the 07/22/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Resident 1 was alert, oriented, and able to verbalize their needs. The MDS showed Resident 1 had medical conditions including kidney and heart diseases, unstable blood sugar levels in the body, bone infection, and amputation of their right toe. The MDS showed Resident 1 was given antibiotic medication during the assessment period. A 08/29/2025 Discharge MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of skin care for residents with skin impairments for 1 of 4 residents (Residents 113) reviewed for non-pressure skin; provide bowel/constipation care for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 3 & 166) reviewed for constipation. These failures placed residents at risk for avoidable discomfort, skin breakdown, pain, and infection. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 07/09/2024 Skin Integrity . policy, a comprehensive skin inspection/assessment would be completed on admission to the facility. The policy showed skin assessments should be completed weekly and any changes reported to the nurse. According to the facility's 09/12/2023 Bowel Protocol policy, the facility would provide effective interventions for constipation consistent with current standards of practice. The policy showed nursing staff would document in the record each time a resident had a Bowel Movement (BM), and the physician would implement standing orders to address any lack of BM. <Skin Care> <Resident 113>…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prepare food under sanitary conditions for 1 of 1 facility kitchens. The failure to ensure cooking surface sanitizer was available at a suitable concentration and ensure exhaust fans were clean placed residents at risk for contaminated food and food-borne illness. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 05/01/2025 Prevention of Cross Contamination policy, the facility must store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The policy showed all equipment, utensils, counters, workstations, and cutting boards should be cleaned and sanitized per department guidelines. <Initial Kitchen Observations> Observation of the facility kitchen on 06/09/2025 at 8:40 AM (a Monday morning) showed the facility kitchen had two red buckets of surface sanitizer prepared. Testing of both buckets showed neither bucket had an effective concentration of sanitizer. The test strip remained orange rather than turning green, indicating the sanitizer was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases. The facility: failed to follow Contact Precautions signs for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 167, 265, & 270) and 2 supplemental residents (Resident 47, & 44) reviewed for Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP - airborne, contact, and droplet precautions used to prevent the spread of transmissible diseases); failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 44) reviewed for EBP; failed to ensure the ice scoop was only used by staff on 1 of 4 units (Lily Garden). The failure to wear PPE (Personal Protective Equipment - gowns, gloves etc.) when required for residents with TBP or EBP orders and prevent potential cross contamination from an ice scoop placed residents at risk for facility-acquired/healthcare-associated infections and related complications. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide required liability notices for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 117) reviewed for liability notices. Failure of the facility to issue a Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC - a document informing Medicare beneficiaries that their covered services will be terminated and providing information on their appeal rights) before discharge from the facility placed Resident 117 at risk for not fully understanding their Medicare benefits and appeal rights. Findings included . <Resident 117> Record review showed Resident 117 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on [DATE]. Resident 117's record showed the facility did not document they provided a NOMNC letter to Resident 117. Resident 117's record showed the facility provided a Nursing Home Transfer or Discharge notice to the resident on 05/22/2025. This notice showed the reason for the discharge was Resident 117's health had improved, and they no longer needed the services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure walls and baseboard in resident rooms were maintained in a homelike condition for 5 of 17 rooms sampled (Rooms 111, 112, 113, 116 & 120) and failed to ensure a privacy curtain was maintained in a clean sanitary condition (room [ROOM NUMBER]). These failures left residents at risk for a less than homelike environment and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 06/12/2024 Resident Belongings and Home Like Environment policy, the facility must provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The policy stated it was the responsibility of all facility staff to create a homelike environment and promptly address any cleaning needs. <room [ROOM NUMBER]> Observation on 06/10/2025 at 8:30 AM areas of white paint splotches were on the wall behind the headboard of resident's bed and was not painted to blend with the rest of the wall color. <room [ROOM NUMBER]> Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate, investigate, and resolve grievances for 2 of 17 sampled residents (Resident 44 & 45) reviewed for grievances and 1 supplementary resident (Resident 55). This failure placed residents at risk for emotional distress, unresolved frustration, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's revised 01/07/2025 Grievance Program (Concern and Comment) policy, Residents and families would receive information on the facility's grievance procedure upon admission, including their right to file a complaint orally or in writing without fear of reprisal. The policy showed if a resident/representative expressed a concern or comment, any staff member could assist them to complete a concern and comment form and resolve the concern. If resolution was not possible at that time, staff would explain to the resident that another staff would be assigned to investigate the concern and contact the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of drug diversion was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 supplemental resident (Resident 55) reviewed for grievances. This failure placed residents at risk for uncontrolled pain and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 05/07/2025 Abuse - Conducting an Investigation policy, when a resident made a complaint or grievance to the facility would be investigated. The policy showed if there was a finding involving neglect, abuse, and/or misappropriation the facility would report the incident, as required by state law. The policy showed the written summary of the investigation should include, but was not limited to: an interview with the person reporting the incident, interviews with any witnesses, an interview with the resident, an interview with the employee as needed, a review of the employee's file, interviews with staff members on all shifts having contact with the resident at the time of the incident, and interviews other residents who received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to develop and/or implement comprehensive Care Plans (CPs) for 3 (Residents 15, 36, & 167) of 17 sample residents whose CPs were reviewed. The failure to develop comprehensive, individualized CPs to address residents' care needs placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, frustration, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policies> According to the facility's 09/05/2024 Comprehensive CPs and Conferences policy, the facility would develop a comprehensive CP for each resident within seven days of completion of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool). The facility's 09/11/2024 Comprehensive CPs and Revisions policy showed the facility would ensure CPs continued to meet residents' needs including addressing short-term problems, adding new interventions to existing CPs, and updating goals as needed. <Resident 15> According to the 05/07/2025 admission MDS, Resident 15 had diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility: failed to ensure physician ordered parameters for medications were followed for 3 of 17 (Resident 114 & 264) sampled residents; failed to ensure orders were clarified as needed for 2 of 5 residents (residents 18 & 166) whose medication regimens were reviewed; failed to ensure weights were monitored as ordered for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 115) reviewed for nutrition. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet needs, and ineffective and/or delayed treatments. Findings included . <Following Orders> <Resident 114> According to the 06/03/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 114 had diagnoses including a stroke history and arthritis. The MDS showed Resident 114 frequently experienced pain during the lookback period. The MDS showed Resident 114's pain frequently made sleeping, participating in therapy, and day-to-day activities more difficult, and reached a severity of seven on a zero-to-ten scale. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on facility staff for assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs - personal hygiene, grooming, and bathing) received the assistance they were assessed to require for 4 of 9 residents (Residents 36, 45, 166, & 167) reviewed for ADLs. The failure to provide ADL assistance to dependent residents as required left residents at risk for poor hygiene, diminished feelings of self-worth, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's 02/12/2024 Activities of Daily Living policy showed the facility would provide all treatment and care based on the comprehensive assessment of the resident, person-centered Care Plan, and resident's choices. The policy showed residents who were unable to carry out their own ADLs would receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition and personal hygiene including bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care. The policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure activity programs met the needs of each resident for 3 of 3 residents (Resident 264, 265 & 270) reviewed for activities. The failure to provide meaningful activities left residents at risk of boredom and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 09/2024 Activities policy, the facility would implement an ongoing activities program that incorporated residents' interests and created opportunities for each resident to have a meaningful life by supporting their wellness. The policy showed all residents who are unable or unwilling to participate in group programs would have consistent, goal oriented and individualized recreation opportunities. <Resident 264> According to the 06/02/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 264 had intact memory and had symptoms of feeling down or depressed. The MDS showed it was very important for Resident 264 to do their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <Resident 115> According to the 04/24/2025 admission MDS, Resident 115 had medical conditions including brain cancer. The MDS showed Resident 115 developed brain abscess (accumulation of pus within the tissues) while recovering from the surgical resection (the process of cutting out tissue or part of an organ) of their brain tumor. The 04/21/2025 pain CP showed Resident 115 expressed discomfort/pain related to their recent brain surgery, back pain, bilateral leg pain from having blood clots, and generalized deconditioning. The CP outlined interventions directing the nursing staff to administer pain medications to Resident 115 as ordered by the physician and to notify the physician if interventions were unsuccessful or if there was a significant change from the resident's past experience of pain. A 04/21/2025 physician's order instructed staff to administer an over-the-counter pain reliever every six hours as needed for a pain level of one-to-three on the zero-to-ten pain scale. An additional 04/21/2025 order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services for 1 of 3 (Resident 264) residents reviewed for behavioral-emotional health. The failure to provide interventions to Resident 264 behavioral health concerns placed Resident 264 and other residents at risk for not receiving the services necessary to meet their mental health needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 264> According to the 06/02/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) Resident 264 had diagnoses including anxiety and depression. The MDS showed Resident 264 took medication for anxiety and had several days when they were feeling down or depressed. Review of 06/10/2025 Mood Care Plan (CP), showed Resident 264 was at risk for changes in their mood or behavior due to their medical conditions. The CP included interventions for staff to provide a psychological (psych) evaluation consult as indicated. Record review showed a 06/03/2025 progress note that showed Resident 264 requested to be referred to psych and the status was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Observation of the the freezer in the Tea Garden Unit's nourishment pantry on 06/13/2025 at 10:41 AM showed an opened package of glycerine swabs. The packaging stated it contained three swabs and two remained in the packet. The packaging stated it was sterile. There was no date on the swab packet indicating when it was opened or for how long the swabs could safely be used. REFERENCE: WAC 388-97-1300(2), -2340. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage and labeling of medications in 1 of 4 unit nutrition pantry fridges (Tea Garden) and 1 of 4 medication carts ([NAME] Unit) and failed to account for missing signatures in the narcotic book for 1 of 4 medication carts ([NAME] Unit) reviewed for medication storage. These failures placed residents at risk of receiving expired medications, ineffective treatment, missing medications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Policy> According to the facility's revised 08/01/2024 Storage and Expiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received timely specialized rehabilitative services for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for therapy services (Resident 113). The failure to timely complete a Speech Language Pathologist (SLP - a speech therapist) evaluation placed Resident 113 at risk for unnecessary diet restrictions, weight loss, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 113> According to the 06/06/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 113 had a moderate memory impairment and no signs and symptoms of a possible swallowing disorder. The MDS showed Resident 113 admitted to the facility on [DATE], received a mechanically altered diet on admission and while a resident at the facility, and received no SLP services during the MDS's lookback period. Record review showed Resident 113 had a 06/03/2025 dietary order for a regular diet with an easy to chew texture and chopped meats. According to the 06/03/2025 Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for Pressure Ulcer/Pressure Injury (PU/PI) was provided the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote wound healing. This failure placed residents at risk for worsening skin conditions, skin breakdown, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility policy titled, Skin Integrity & PU/PI Prevention and Management, revised 07/09/2024, showed the facility would provide the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to a resident with PU/PI to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing. The policy showed preventative measures identified to maintain and improve the resident's skin condition were implemented in the Care Plan (CP). The policy showed when skin breakdown occurred, it required attention and a change in the plan of care could be indicated to treat the resident. <Resident 1> According to the 01/21/2025 Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse and neglect policies and procedures regarding prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse and/or neglect. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate the incident and allegation of physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for facility incidents. This failure placed residents at risk for abuse and/or neglect by caregivers, avoidable and unnecessary pain, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The 06/17/2024 Abuse - Protection of Residents facility policy showed the facility must develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents. The policy showed the facility must have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated, including examining the alleged victim for any sign of injury, both physical and psychosocial. <Resident 1> According to the 12/23/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-03 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written transfer/discharge notices as required for 3 of 3 residents (Resident 1, 6, & 7) reviewed for hospitalization. Failure to provide notification to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the reason(s) for the transfer or discharge in writing placed residents at risk for a discharge that did not meet the resident's and/or their representative's stated goals for care and preferences. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The Transfers and Discharges facility policy, revised 06/28/2024, showed the facility would provide transfer/discharge notice to the resident/responsible party in accordance with federal regulations. The Notice of Transfers and Discharges facility policy, revised 10/29/2024, showed the facility must notify the resident and the resident's representative of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in language and manner they understood. The policy showed the written notice in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: Provide an environment that was free from accident hazards; and ensure each resident received adequate supervision and/or assistance to prevent accidents, for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls. These failures placed residents at risk for injuries, avoidable accidents, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the undated facility guidance, Lippincott procedures- Fall Prevention, long-term care showed the factors that contribute to falls among older adults included conditions that affect mobility, medication use, increasing physical disability, and impaired vision, hearing, or mental status. The guidelines showed preventing falls begin with identifying residents at greatest risk. The guidelines showed fall prevention care plans should be individualized and comprehensive for each resident. The guidelines showed documentation associated with fall prevention included measures taken to help prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physical environment was kept clean and food stored under sanitary conditions for 1 of 1 kitchen observed. Facility staff failed to: Label and date food; discard damaged/spoiled food; keep kitchen vents free from dirt/dust build-up; and maintain cleanliness of handwashing sinks and garbage bins. The facility failed to ensure 2 of 4 resident refrigerators in the nursing units (Lily Garden & Tea Garden) were monitored for opened and undated food and liquids, partially-eaten and spoiled resident-owned food brought in from outside sources, and cleanliness. These failures contributed to an unsanitary kitchen environment and unsafe storage of food and drinks, and placed residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility policy, Sanitation and Maintenance, revised 04/26/2023, the Director of Food and Nutrition Services was responsible for ensuring the dietary department was maintained according…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-16 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide residents and/or the resident's representative a written notice of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer or within 24 hours, for 1 of 1 closed records (Resident 21) and 2 of 3 residents (Residents 43 & 41) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed residents and their representatives at risk of not being informed of their right to, and the cost of, holding the resident's bed while hospitalized . Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility'spolicy titled, Bed Hold, revised 11/17/2022 showed the facility would provide the bed hold policy upon transfer of a resident to the hospital or within 24 hours of transfer to the hospital. The policy showed written information regarding bed holds and payment would be provided to the resident and/or the resident's representative and the facility would document multiple attempts to reach the resident/representative. <Resident 21> Review of the facility census showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop comprehensive Care Plans (CP) for 7 (Resident 43, 46, 264, 25, 163, 167, & 2) of 17 sampled residents whose comprehensive CPs were reviewed. Failure to establish individualized CPs with identified goals that accurately reflected the resident's condition, placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's Comprehensive [CP] & Revisions policy revised 08/22/2023 showed the facility would ensure the comprehensive CP was reviewed and revised. The revisions would include changes to care delivery such as additional interventions to existing problems, updating goal or problem statements, and adding short term problem, goal, and interventions to address a time limited condition. <264> According to the 04/11/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 264 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was able to make themselves understood and understand others…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents consistent with professional standards of practice including the failure to offer nonpharmacological interventions, identify parameters for administration of as needed (PRN) pain medications, and identify the location of residents' pain for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 18, 13, 213, & 167) reviewed for pain management. These failures left residents at risk for experiencing untreated pain and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's Pain Assessment and Management policy revised 09/12/2023 showed the facility must ensure pain management was provided to residents that aligned with the residents' Care Plan (CP) and resident goals. This policy showed the facility would address and/or treat the underlying causes of pain while implementing nonpharmacological and pharmacological (not involving the use of drug/medication) interventions to pain management. <Resident 167> According to the 04/01/2024 admission Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <TBP> <Resident 167> According to the 04/01/2024 admission MDS, Resident 167 had medical conditions including a bladder infection and was administered antibiotics during the assessment period. The MDS showed Resident 167 was frequently incontinent of their urine and was assessed to require substantial/maximal assistance from staff for their toileting hygiene. In an observation and interview on 04/09/2024 at 10:13 AM, a Contact Precaution sign was observed posted outside Resident 167's door and instructed all staff to perform HH and wear PPE at all times. Staff T (Registered Nurse - RN) confirmed Resident 167 had a contagious infection in their urine. At 10:15 AM, the TBP sign was observed different; it was replaced with Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) and instructed staff to only wear PPE during high-contact resident activities. Staff T stated they did not know why the TBP was changed. On 04/10/2024 at 8:27 AM, the TBP sign outside Resident 167's door was switched back to Contact Precaution. In a joint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to encode and transmit resident assessment data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) within the required timeframe, for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 9) reviewed for timeliness in transmission. This failure placed residents at risk for inaccurate monitoring of decline or progress over time, untimely comprehensive review of residents' health data/information, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident Assessment Instrument - RAI> According to the October 2023 Long-Term Care Facility RAI 3.0 User's Manual (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents), all Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessments must be submitted within 14 days of the MDS Completion Date. The manual showed MDS transmission requirements applied to all MDS 3.0 records used to meet both federal and state requirements. <Resident 9> Review of the facility census showed Resident 9 discharged on 11/29/2023. The 11/29/2023 Discharge Return Not Anticipated MDS showed the assessment's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) of 2 of 17 residents (Residents 28 & 166) were completed accurately to reflect the resident's condition and overall health status. The facility failed to identify Resident 28's poor dental status and failed to capture Resident 166's active diagnosis of dementia (a memory problem). These failures placed Residents 28 and 166 and other residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility policy titled, Certification of Accuracy of the MDS, revised 08/17/2023, the assessment must accurately reflect the resident's status. <Resident 28> The 03/21/2024 admission MDS showed Resident 28 had clear speech, their memory was intact, and had medical conditions including heart failure, renal failure, muscle weakness, and malnutrition. The MDS showed Resident 28 did not have any oral/dental issues during the assessment period. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <Resident 32> Review of the 03/07/2024 admission MDS showed Resident 32 was admitted to the facility following a hip fracture. This MDS showed Resident 32 was totally dependent on staff for personal hygiene and bathing needs. This MDS showed Resident 32 did not reject care during the look back period of the assessment. Review of Resident 32's March 2024 task documentation showed on 03/07/2024 staff documented bathing did not occur. The task documentation showed Resident 32 was not offered or provided a bath from 03/07/2024 to 03/31/2024, indicating the resident went 24 days without bathing. Review of a 04/10/2024 [NAME] (directions to care staff) showed Resident 32 preferred bathing on Monday and Wednesday evenings. In an observation and interview on 04/09/2024 at 11:55 AM, Resident 32 was lying in bed and had short facial hair stubble. At that time, Resident 32 stated it was a couple of weeks since their last bed bath and they preferred to be clean shaven. Similar observations were made on 04/12/2024 at 9:32 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and provide care and services in accordance with the resident's goals and professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 163) reviewed for Anticoagulation (AC - blood thinner) use and monitoring. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or worsening bleeding and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the 11/28/2023 facility policy titled, Area of Focus: AC Management, residents who received an AC were at increased risk of bleeding and required additional monitoring to ensure safe resident-centered care. The policy showed the facility should ensure the Care Plan (CP) reflected AC use and was updated as needed. <Resident 163> Review of the 04/01/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed Resident 163 had clear speech, their memory was intact, and had medical conditions including a right hip fracture after a fall. The MDS showed Resident 163 was administered an AC during the assessment period. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent weight loss for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 163 & 264) reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to timely assess the residents' nutritional status after facility admission and failed to develop and implement a nutrition Care Plan (CP) with person-centered interventions. These failures placed residents at risk for unidentified nutritional needs and concerns, unplanned weight loss, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policies> Review of the facility policy titled, Nutrition Assessment, revised 04/25/2023, each resident would receive a comprehensive assessment to determine nutritional needs on admission and when a resident became at risk for compromised nutritional status. The policy showed the Director of Food and Nutrition Services or designee would visit each resident within 72 hours of admission, review the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement care for 1 (Resident 43) of 1 resident reviewed for Tube Feeding (TF - nutrition delivered into the stomach by tube) management including documenting and tracking the rate of the TF orders, documenting the amount of TF nutrition and water infused. These failures placed Resident 43 at risk for inadequate calorie or protein intake and/or inadequate hydration. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's Nutritional Intake policy revised 08/24/2023, the facility would document the nutritional intake on each individual resident. <Resident 43> According to the 03/04/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), Resident 43 had diagnoses including inability to express speech, a brain bleed, weakness to one side of their body, malnutrition, and a swallowing disorder. This assessment showed Resident 43 received more than 51 percent of their total calories and fluid intake via TF. Review of a 03/13/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 residents (Residents 167 & 31) reviewed for respiratory care were provided care consistent with professional standards of practice. Failure to provide deep breathing treatments as ordered (Resident 167) and obtain Physician Orders (POs) for supplemental oxygen (Resident 31) left residents at risk for over or under oxygenation, respiratory discomfort, infections, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 167> <Facility Policy> Review of the 09/27/2023 facility policy titled, Incentive Spirometry [IS], showed the facility would provide IS (a breathing exercise using a handheld medical device to help improve lung function) in accordance with professional standards of practice as outlined by [NAME] (a book used for medical references). According to the revised 05/22/2023 IS Lippincott procedures, documentation associated with incentive spirometry included: Assessment of the resident before and after the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for residents diagnosed with dementia to attain and/or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 166) reviewed for dementia (a memory problem) care. Failure of the facility to identify, develop, and implement a person-centered Care Plan (CP) that addressed residents' dementia diagnosis and behaviors placed the residents at risk for having unidentified and/or unmet care needs, avoidable decline, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility policy titled, Care of the Cognitively Impaired [Dementia Care], revised 08/22/2023, the facility would provide dementia treatment and services that were person-centered and reflected the resident's goals of care while maximizing dignity, privacy, socialization, and safety. The policy showed the facility would develop and implement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 2 (Resident 18 & 13) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Facility staff failed to: provide non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering an as needed Antipsychotic (AP) medication, re-evaluate and document the specific condition being treated with the as needed AP medication, obtain consent prior to administering psychotropics, and identify target behaviors. These failures placed residents at risk to receive unnecessary psychotropic medications, experience adverse side effects, and detracted from the resident/resident representative's ability to exercise their right to decline treatment/therapies. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's Psychotropic Medication Informed Consent policy revised 10/04/2022 showed the facility would obtain consent or refusal to the use of psychotropic medications and the medication would not be started…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 garbage dumpsters and 1 of 1 recycling dumpster reviewed and inspected for outdoor garbage and refuse disposal were properly covered and the surrounding areas were kept clean as required. These failures placed the facility at risk of attracting bugs, rodents, and other disease-carrying germs/bacteria that could reproduce, grow, and place the residents at risk for acquiring these diseases. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the 04/25/2024 facility policy titled, Disposal of Garbage and Refuse, the facility must dispose garbage and refuse properly per federal, state, and local requirements. The policy showed all waste should be properly contained in the dumpsters and were covered appropriately. The policy showed all areas, where garbage/refuse were located, were kept clean, free of debris, and maintained in a sanitary condition to prevent harborage and feeding of pests. A joint observation and interview on 04/12/2024 at 9:59 AM with Staff D (Dietary Manager) showed three dumpsters…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure specialized rehabilitative services were provided as assessed to be required for 1 of 2 sample residents (Residents 265) reviewed for rehabilitation with skilled therapy services. This failure prevented residents from attaining, maintaining, or restoring their highest practicable level of physical, mental, functional, and psycho-social well-being. Findings included . <Resident 265> According to the 04/10/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool - MDS), Resident 265 admitted to the facility on [DATE] status post right hip fracture with surgical repair. The assessment showed Resident 265 was assessed to require specialized rehabilitative services to include Physical Therapy (PT) and Occupational Therapy (OT). The assessment showed Resident 265 utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility devices. The MDS showed Resident 265 had diagnoses of a degenerative neurological disorder, generalized muscle weakness, unsteadiness on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were accurate and consistent for 2 of 17 sample residents (Residents 166 & 167) whose resident records were reviewed. The facility failed to ensure the correct type of active diagnosis was identified (Resident 166) and the correct Advance Directives (AD) status was represented (Resident 167) in the resident's records. These failures placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, missed opportunities for care planning, and inaccessible health care instructions if/when needed. Findings included . <Resident 166> According to the 03/21/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 166 had no verbal communication, was rarely or never understood, had both short-term and long-term memory problems, and was severely impaired with their daily decision-making. Review of Resident 166's diagnosis list showed the resident had a diagnosis of dementia without behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer a pneumococcal vaccine for 1 (Resident 213) of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations. This failure placed the resident at risk for contracting pneumonia (a potentially life threatening lung infection) and associated complications. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's Influenza Vaccine & Pneumococcal Vaccine Policy for Residents revised 09/13/2023 showed each resident would be offered a pneumococcal vaccine. If the resident was eligible for the vaccine, the vaccine would be administered to the resident per Physician Orders (POs). <Resident 213> Review of the 04/03/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) showed Resident 213 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This assessment showed Resident 213 was not up to date on the pneumococcal vaccine. Review of an Informed Consent for Pneumococcal Vaccine showed Resident 213 consented to receive the pneumococcal vaccine on 03/27/2024. Review of Resident 213's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 9 According to the 03/01/2023 Admissions MDS Resident 9 had diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a brain disease that can cause confusion), Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT - a blood clotting condition), anemia (low red blood cell count), insomnia, and chronic pain. The MDS showed Resident 9 expected to discharge to the community and active discharge planning was already occurring. Review of the 03/01/2023 Discharge CP showed the goal was to develop and follow full discharge plan with comprehensive and showed Resident 9 wished to return home. The Discharge CP did not include specific and measurable goals for discharge. In an interview on 03/20/23 at 1:29 PM, Staff H (Unit Care Coordinator) stated the Discharge CPs the facility created for residents did not include measurable goals and this was something the facility probably should work on. In an interview on 03/21/2023 at 9:00 AM Staff B stated CPs required specific and measurable goals. Staff B stated they did not know what specifically was meant by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Care Plans (CP) were maintained, revised, and updated as required for 5 (Residents 26, 37, 20, 39, & 25) of 12 sampled residents. This failure left residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 26 According to a 02/05/2023 admission Minimum Data Assessment (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 26 was on isolation or quarantine for an active infectious disease during the observation period. Observations on 03/15/2023 at 10:29 AM showed no isolation or quarantine sign up on Resident 26's door. In an interview at this time, Resident 26 stated they were sick back in January with a respiratory infection and was feeling better. The resident indicated they were no longer on isolation. In an interview on 3/15/2023 at 12:41 PM, Staff L (Unit Care Coordinator) confirmed Resident 26 was not currently on isolation or quarantine precautions. Review of Resident 27's February Treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner and in accordance with professional standards of food safety. The failure to ensure food was stored appropriately, food and trays were free from contaminants, and kitchen staffs' hair was secured as required left residents at risk of food contamination and food-borne illness. Findings included . Facility Policy According to the facility's 12/17/2021 Food Safety policy, upon delivery food should be labeled with the date received. The policy showed if multiple items were packaged in the same box, each individual item should be labeled with a date of receipt. Food Storage Observation of the facility's kitchen on 03/15/2023 at 9:01 AM showed the kitchen's freezer contained one open bag of chicken patties. The bag of patties was not labeled to indicate when it was received or when it was opened and did not indicate for how long they were safe to eat. The freezer also contained two other unopened bags of frozen meats that were not labeled to indicate until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a system to ensure a copy of the Advance Directive (AD) was obtained from residents/representatives who have an AD in place and make the documentation readily available in the medical records for 2 of 12 residents (Resident 20 & 32) reviewed. The facility failed to perform family/representative follow up after providing AD information for 1 of 12 residents (Resident 39) determined to have cognitive limitations necessary for healthcare decision-making. Failure to have the AD accessible to facility staff and failure to follow up the formulation of an AD placed residents at risk of losing their right to have their stated preferences and decisions honored regarding medical treatment including end-of-life care. Findings included . Resident 20 According to the 02/15/2023 Care Plan (CP), Resident 20 had an AD. Review of Resident 20's records showed a 02/15/2023 social services care conference note indicating Resident 20 had delegated a family representative as Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advance Beneficiary Notices (ABN) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 26) reviewed for SNF beneficiary protection notification. This failure placed residents at risk of not being informed of their right to make choices about further treatment or services, as required by the Medicare Program. Findings included . Resident 26 According to the 02/05/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 26 started Medicare part A skilled services on 01/31/2023. The End of Medicare Stay MDS showed the last day of Resident 26's skilled services was 03/15/2023. On 03/17/2023 at 11:27 AM, Staff K (Business Office Manager) provided a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage that was signed on 03/08/2023, with an identified last covered date (LCD) of 03/15/2023. According to the facility census information, Resident 26 remained in the facility as private payee effective 03/16/2023. There was no ABN form found in the medical records to show the information about charges for care and services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system by which the office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) received required discharge information for 2 (Resident 41 & 25) of 2 residents reviewed for discharge to the hospital. Failure to ensure required notification was completed, prevented the LTCO office the opportunity to educate residents and advocate for them regarding the discharge process. Findings included . Review of a 08/16/2022 facility Notice of Transfers and Discharges policy showed the facility would provide notice to the resident and/or representative in situations where the facility initiates a transfer or discharge. This policy stated a copy of the notice of transfer/discharge would be sent to a representative of the office of the State LTCO for all facility-initiated transfers or discharges and the facility must maintain evidence the notice was sent to the LTCO. Resident 41 According to the 01/10/2023 Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 41 was discharged on 01/10/2023 to an acute hospital with Return…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing services were provided within professional standards of nursing for 3 of 12 sample residents reviewed (Residents 9, 37 & 32). Facility failure to: ensure pain medications were not given outside parameters (Resident 9); ensure psychotropic medications were monitored for Target Behaviors (TBs - the behaviors the medication was prescribed to treat) and Adverse Side Effects (ASEs) (Resident 9); ensure nurses clarified Physician's Orders (POs) (Resident 37); nurses only sign for tasks completed (Resident 32); ensure dressings were changed timely (Resident 32) left residents at risk for negative health outcomes. Findings included . Resident 9 According to the 03/01/2023 Admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 9 had diagnoses including malnutrition, chronic pain syndrome, and insomnia. The MDS showed Resident 9 took pain medications as needed and a hypnotic medication (a class of medications used to induce and/or maintain sleep). The MDS showed Resident 9 had a history of falling in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 3 of 12 (Residents 9, 26, & 17) sample residents whose records were reviewed. Facility failure to document resident refusals and maintain complete and accurate medical records left residents at risk for unidentified patterns of refusals, inaccurate medical records, and other negative outcomes. Findings included . Resident 9 According to the 03/01/2023 Admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment) Resident 9 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a brain disease that can cause confusion), altered mental state, and malnutrition. The MDS showed Resident 9 demonstrated no rejection of care during the assessment period. The MDS showed Resident 9 required liquid nutrition through a feeding tube before admitting to the facility. Review of the physician's orders showed a 02/27/2023 order to weigh Resident 9 every day for 5 days starting 02/28/2023. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 3.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 3.3 | +1.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEVELOPERS INVESTMENT COMPANY INC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/07/1998 |
| PRESTON, FORREST | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/07/1998 |
| BUTNER, NANCY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/16/2018 |
| GILBERT, DENNIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/10/2025 |
| VIOLA, EDDIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/21/2025 |
| CROSS, CINDY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/28/2003 |
| HENRY, TERRY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/28/2003 |
| LAY, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 02/09/2018 |
| SWANKER, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 04/01/2011 |
| THURMOND, JOAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/28/2003 |
| FEDERAL WAY MEDICAL INVESTORS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/06/2018 |
| LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/30/2025 |
| FLETCHER, TODD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/08/2018 |
| PACIO, GLENN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/30/2025 |
| PRESTON, AUBREY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/13/2014 |
| ZIEGLER, JAMES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/13/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Washington Medicaid page for homes that do.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505512. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.