No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Marysville Care Center

1821 Grove Street, Marysville, WA 98270 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 97 certified beds · (360) 659-3926 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (360) 659-3926 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2026Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)3 actual-harm citations$95,001 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $95,001 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-17)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4420 76th St NE · (360) 651-7490 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Everett Clinic, 4420 76th St NE · (360) 651-7410 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.2 mi
1258 State Ave · (360) 658-8483 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6915 Armar Rd · (360) 363-8400 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
7227 44th Ave NE · (425) 232-6689

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.9%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.5%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms31.2%17.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.9%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.3%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.0%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control33.6%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.9%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.8%82.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.4%19.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.3%13.4%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.541.331.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.231.521.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 244 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.45U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 90 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.1%CMS range 52.7–64.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 7.2–12.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 4.0–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.31
RN hours/ resident / day
0.41
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.32
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.04
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.84
RN hoursweekends
41.9%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 79.5 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.31 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.50 to 0.84 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-29)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-11)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for blood thinning medication (Warfarin) use were free from significant medication errors. Resident 1 experienced harm when they received two doses of a blood thinning medication when the medication was on hold, were hospitalized for a brain hemorrhage (bleeding within the skull), had an INR (International Normalized Ratio - a test to determine how long it takes for blood to clot) of 6.9 (normal range for resident 2.5-3.5) and required Kcentra and Vitamin K (blood clotting medications used for urgent reversal of blood thinner medications) in the emergency room. This failure placed all residents receiving blood thinning medications at risk for significant medication errors, serious complications from bleeding and a diminished quality of life. Findings included. Review of a facility policy titled Anticoagulation Management, review date 11/19/2024 documented: - Review the MAR (medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-08-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders and recommendations were followed and a change in condition was identified timely accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for a change in condition. Resident 1 experienced harm when they had a severe increase in edema (swelling caused by excess fluid trapped in body tissues) of all extremities, and developed complications from incorrect application of compression stockings, a lack of monitoring and treating the edema, development of a wound on the right toe related to the increased swelling that required hospitalization for shortness of breath, acute on chronic congestive heart failure (a long-term condition when the heart cannot pump blood well enough as it should), and pleural effusions (buildup of fluid between tissues that line the lungs and chest). The failure to ensure physician orders and recommendations were followed placed residents' at risk to develop medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer physician medication orders for 1 of 2 (Resident 1) residents reviewed for medication errors. Failure to clarify a physician's order for a diuretic (medication to reduce fluid buildup in the body) medication resulted in a significant medication error that caused harm to Resident 1 who experienced anasarca (swelling caused by excess fluid trapped in body tissues) of all extremities with a significant increase in lower extremity swelling. Resident 1 required hospitalization for shortness of breath, acute on chronic congestive heart failure (a long-term condition when the heart cannot pump blood well enough as it should) and pleural effusions (buildup of fluid between tissues that line the lungs and chest). Failure to properly administer physician medications orders placed residents at risk for complications and a potential decline in their condition. Findings included . Resident 1 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified abuse or neglect, potential ongoing abuse/neglect, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of a facility policy titled Abuse-Conducting an Investigation, reviewed 04/01/2026, documented: It is the policy of this facility that allegations of abuse are promptly and thoroughly investigated.Procedure-8. The written summary of the investigation should include, but is not limited to:h. Interviews with staff members on all shifts having contact with the resident at the time of the incidenti. Interviews with the resident's roommate, family, and/or visitors who may have information regarding the incident.j. Interviews with other residents who received care or services from the alleged perpetrator.k. A review of all circumstances surrounding the incident. According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to protect residents right to be free from neglect for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls. Facility staff failed to follow the plan of care which resulted in Resident 1 falling from their bed. This failure placed residents at risk for potential physical or mental harm, feeling safe, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of a facility policy titled Abuse-Identification of Types reviewed 04/01/2026 documented: Neglect is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Willful-is defined as the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm Review of a facility policy titled Abuse-Prevention reviewed 04/01/2026 documented it is the policy of this facility to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were dated and labeled and expired items were discarded in the 2 of 3 sampled facility nourishment refrigerators (Quilceda and Havenwood) reviewed for safe/sanitary food storage. This failure placed residents at risk of consuming expired food, foodborne illness, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Food from Outside Sources, revised date 05/06/2025, documented food stored in refrigerator should be labeled with the resident's name and room number. Items should be discarded if past expiration date. Review of facility policy titled, Food Safety, reviewed date 05/01/2025, documented leftovers must be dated and labeled properly and discarded after 72 hours. In an observation on 09/23/2025 at 10:22 AM, the nourishment refrigerator in Quilceda clean utility room was observed to include: a container strawberry with brown and fuzzy covering, labeled 09/04/2025, a package of mini maple pancakes and sausage with no resident's name, best before date was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system was in place in which residents' records were complete, accurate, accessible, and systematically organized for 4 of 8 residents (Residents 3, 7, 54, and 86) reviewed for accurate and complete medical records. The facility failed to ensure the medical records reflected the behavior/psychotropic review documentation for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 3) failed to have accurate documentation for monitoring and consents for anti-anxiety medications for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 7), failed to include bed hold and discharge documentation for 1 of 2 (Resident 86) discharged residents, failed to ensure accessible documentation for hospice documentation for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 54). These failures to not maintain complete, accessible and accurate medical records placed residents at risk for medical complications, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included .<BEHAVIORS/PSYCHOTROPIC MANAGEMENT> <RESIDENT 7>…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to address, respond to and/or resolve concerns and/or suggestions brought forward by the resident council (RC) for 6 of 6 months (March, April, May, June, July and August 2025) of RC minutes reviewed. Additional failed practice included the facility failure to maintain complete and accurate Resident Council meeting minutes that included details of concerns and grievances voiced during Resident Council meetings, and failures to log, report, investigate, and resolve concerns voiced by the Resident Council. These failures resulted in the same unresolved/unaddressed concerns being brought forward for consecutive months without resolution, and resulted in RC members feeling frustrated, unheard and powerless to affect the care they receive and/or their environment. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Council reviewed 09/26/2024, showed the Activities Director or Social Service Director will facilitate follow-up on all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that current legal guardian documents were in the resident's medical record and did not provide written and verbal information related to formulating an advance directive for 1 of 5 (Resident 4) residents reviewed for advance directives. These failures placed the resident at risk of not having correct or updated legal guardian documents to verify the accurate guardian and to allow the legal guardian to formulate an advance directive to express their medical care preferences.Findings included .Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include personal history of traumatic brain injury (occurs when an external force causes damage to the brain), aphasia (language disorder that affects ability to speak, understand, read and write), and communicating hydrocephalus (accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid in the brain's ventricles).Review of Resident 4's Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed they had a legal guardian as their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an injury of unknown source with significant injury for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 5) reviewed for reporting. The facility's failure to report delayed appropriate oversight and investigation, placing residents at risk for harm and unidentified abuse and/or neglect.Findings included .The State of Washington's Nursing Home Guidelines-The Purple Book dated October 2015, Prevention and Protection, Incident Identification, Investigation, and Reporting directs what nursing home facilities report. The facility should report to the Department by telephone and via the reporting log when there was reasonable cause to believe violations have occurred involving abuse, neglect, abandonment, mistreatment and injuries of unknown sources. Facility would report to the department within two hours if there was serious bodily injury; or within 24 hours, if there was not serious bodily injury.Resident 5 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR a federally required screening of all individuals who has a serious mental illness (SMI) and or intellectual disability (ID) prior to admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility or a significant change of condition) report into the resident's assessment, and care planning for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 2) reviewed for PASRR. Facility failure to incorporate the PASRR recommendations into the residents' assessment and care plan delayed the implementation of recommendations and left the residents at risk for unmet mental health and activity needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) reviewed 09/26/2024, showed the facility must incorporate the recommendations from the PASARR level II determination and the evaluation report into a resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessments were completed timely for all residents following significant change in status for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 20) reviewed for possible serious mental disorders and related conditions. This failure resulted in a potential inability to receive and benefit from Level II PASSR services for Resident 20 and placed other residents at risk for a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), reviewed 09/26/2024, showed the nursing facility must notify the state mental health authority or state intellectual disability authority, as applicable, promptly after a significant change in the mental or physical condition of a resident who has mental illness or intellectual disability for resident review. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of anxiety disorder. Review of the care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans to accurately reflect resident conditions and needs for 2 of 4 residents (Resident 5 and 82) reviewed for falls and dental. This failed practice had the potential for unmet resident care needs.Findings Included.Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans and Conferences, reviewed 08/29/2025 documented the resident's care plan must be reviewed after each assessment and revised based on changing goals, preferences and needs of the resident and in response to current interventions.<FALLS>Resident 5 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include pneumonia, falls, and encephalopathy (brain disease that alters brain function).Review of the facility state reporting log documented Resident 5 had unwitnessed falls on 06/16/2025, 06/17/2025, 07/12/2025 and 08/24/2025.Review of the facility incident report dated 06/16/2025 documented Resident 5's bed would be placed in the lowest position as an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that services provided met professional standards for 2 of 3 (Resident 6 and 70) residents reviewed for professional standards. Resident 6 did not receive prescribed bowel medications when they experienced constipation and Resident 70 had a change in condition that required monitoring and new medication orders that were not documented timely. These failures placed residents at risk of not being appropriately monitored during a change in condition, effectiveness or side effects of new medications, constipation, pain, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included. Review of the facility policy titled Bowel Protocol, revised date 09/16/2024, documented the facility in coordination with the resident's attending practitioner would implement standing orders to address a lack of bowel movement. <RESIDENT 6> Resident 6 readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 6's bowel elimination record from 09/09/2025 to 09/23/2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident 86), reviewed for hemodialysis (medical procedure that uses a machine to filter and clean the blood when the kidneys are failing), had consistent, completed and accurate assessments on the facility's dialysis communication form (a form containing vital information about the resident which is sent to the dialysis center for coordination of care and services). This failure placed the resident at risk for medical complications and unmet care needs.Review of facility policy Area of Focus: Dialysis, dated 11/19/2024 documented to initiate the Pre/Post Dialysis Communication Form to be sent to the dialysis clinic with the resident, obtain vital signs of the resident upon return from dialysis and complete the Pre/Post Dialysis Communication Form, and to maintain dialysis transfer form in the resident's medical record.Findings included.<RESIDENT 86>Resident 86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a dementia care plan that addressed the significant mental and psychosocial needs of the resident, established personalized and achievable goals, and identified interventions to promote a person-centered environment for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 5) reviewed for dementia care. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet psychosocial needs, increased behaviors and decreased quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled Care of the Cognitively Impaired (Dementia Care) reviewed 09/02/2025 documented the facility's procedure to provided dementia care services included the following:I . Identify, address, and/or obtain necessary services for the dementia care needs of residents;2. Develop and implement person-centered care plans that include and support the dementia care needs, identified in the comprehensive assessment;3. Develop individualized interventions related to the resident's symptomology and rate of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 medication carts and treatment carts (Pilchuck unit) had secured medications. These failures placed residents at risk for unauthorized access to medications and biologicals, and potential drug misuse.Findings included.<PILCHUCK TREATMENT CART>On 09/25/2025 at 11:12 AM observed the Pilchuck unit treatment cart unlocked. The treatment cart was in front of the Pilchuck nurse's station. All drawers opened and contained creams and ointments in the top drawer. There were several staff, to include two housekeepers and Staff M, Nursing Aide Certified, who walked by the opened treatment cart. Staff N, Registered Nurse (RN), was assigned to Pilchuck unit, was not within sight of the cart and was located on the second hallway of Pilchuck. Staff N was located exiting a resident's room when asked to check the treatment cart. Staff N stated they had not used the treatment cart, but then stated they had, and it had not been open for more than 10-15 minutes. Staff N stated the cart does not always lock when pushed in. Staff N…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for care planning. The failure to ensure the comprehensive care plan was person-centered to maintain and or attain the resident's highest practicable well-being placed the residents at risk of not receiving services that would meet their needs, adverse health effects and a decreased quality of life. Findings included .<RESIDENT 1>Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding within the [NAME]), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and presence of prosthetic heart valve, and long term (current) use of anticoagulants (blood thinning medication).Review of Resident 1's medication orders on 07/16/2025, documented Resident 1 had a medication order for Warfarin (a blood thinning medication) for a diagnosis of prosthetic heart valve. Review of Resident 1's comprehensive care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident record was provided for review in a timely manner to the legal representative for 1 of 1 sampled resident's (Resident 1) reviewed for requested medical records. This failure placed the legal representative at risk for not having full clinical information about the resident in order to best represent them and make informed decisions. Findings included . Review of facility policy titled, Disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI)-Release of Information, revised 02/26/2025, documented: - Each resident has the right to access their PHI contained in the medical record. The policy stated requested copies of a resident's record should be provided within two working days (excluding weekends and/or holidays) if the resident currently resides at the facility unless state law mandates a shorter period. - In accordance with 42 CFR 483.10(b)(2), a request may be made orally by the resident/legal representative. - Review the copy fee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to review risks and benefits with the resident's legal representative for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for psychotropic medication use. Failure to review the risk and benefits of a high-risk medication placed the resident at risk for unnecessary medication use and diminished quality of life and this failure placed the legal representative at risk for not having full clinical information about the resident to best represent the resident and make informed decisions. Findings include . <Resident 1> Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include intercranial hemorrhage (bleeding within the [NAME]), cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness of partial paralysis) of left side, bipolar disorder, depression and anxiety. Resident 1 had a legal guardian as their responsible party and made decisions for the resident.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for 2 of 5 sampled Residents (Residents 1 and 2) reviewed for incident investigations. Failure to conduct a thorough investigation to identify the root cause(s) and all contributing factors related to incidents and investigations placed residents at risk for unidentified abuse or neglect, risk for injury, monitoring and unmet care needs. Findings included . According to the Washington State Reporting Guidelines for Nursing Homes (Purple Book), dated October 2015, A thorough investigation is a systematic collection and review of evidence/information that describes and explains an event or a series of events. It includes guidelines for prevention and protection, incident identification, investigation and reporting for nursing homes, the facility investigation should end with the identification of who was involved in the incident, and what, when, where, why, and how the incident happened including the probable or reasonable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for 1 of 2 sampled Residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse/neglect and skin concerns. Failure to conduct a thorough investigation to identify the root cause(s) and all contributing factors related to Resident 1's incidents, placed the resident at risk for unidentified abuse or neglect, risk for injury, and unmet care needs. Findings included . According to the Washington State Reporting Guidelines for Nursing Homes (Purple Book), dated October 2015, A thorough investigation is a systematic collection and review of evidence/information that describes and explains an event or a series of events. It includes guidelines for prevention and protection, incident identification, investigation and reporting for nursing homes, the facility investigation should end with the identification of who was involved in the incident, and what, when, where, why, and how the incident happened including the probable or reasonable cause.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <RESIDENT 17> Resident 17 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included weakness, diabetes mellitus type two (condition in which the body had trouble controlling blood sugar), and arthropathic psoriasis (a type of arthritis that affects people with the skin condition psoriasis). Review of Resident 17's progress note dated 08/23/2024 showed the resident had been seen by a dentist and were started on an antibiotic medication for a dental infection. Review of Resident 17's electronic and paper medical record showed no consultation report regarding their visit to the dentist on 08/23/2024. In an interview on 10/10/2024 at 8:47 AM Staff N, Unit Coordinator, stated they send out a blank consultation report with residents when they leave the facility for an appointment, and they rarely get returned. Staff N stated they were not aware of a process to follow up with the outside provider to obtain records related to a resident's appointment. In an interview on 10/11/2024 at 9:04 AM Staff B, DNS, stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0895 — pattern
    Have a Compliance and Ethics Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to properly implement the compliance and ethics program, prevent the submission of data/documentation known to be inaccurate and unethical practice for eight of ten residents (Residents 14, 22,33,36, 42, 58, 60 and 67) reviewed for therapy missed visit documentation. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving appropriate physician ordered therapy services and potential decline in condition. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Compliance and Ethics Program dated 06/01/2024, showed the facility and associates are committed to providing quality care and services necessary to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The facility is also firmly committed to preventing fraud and abuse, complying with all applicable Federal and state laws and regulations and ethical behavior. The policy also showed Falsification of Documentation - Documentation of care or service that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system to ensure resident grievances were identified, logged, and resolved timely for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 and 2) reviewed for grievances. Facility failure to ensure missing personal items were found or replaced and resident representative comfort concerns were addressed placed residents at risk for missing property, discomfort and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Grievance Program (Comment and Concern reviewed date of 09/26/2024 showed: -Comment and concern program was utilized to address concerns of residents, family members, visitors and guests. -Any associate (staff) could assist in the completion of the comment and concern form and resolved the concern if possible and report all concerns to the supervisor on duty who will then contact the Administrator and Director of Nursing. <RESIDENT 1> Resident 1 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included lung cancer, malnutrition, and spinal stenosis (spaces inside the bones of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who had a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities were offered the most appropriate setting for their needs [in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care setting]; and receive the services they need in those settings), was followed for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 17). Failure to accurately complete a level one PASRR for Resident 17 and refer for a level two (an in-depth evaluation to determine whether the resident required specialized rehabilitation services) as indicated placed residents at risk for not receiving care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) review date of 09/26/2024 showed any resident with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federally required screening of all individuals who has both an Intellectual Disability (ID) or Related Condition (RC) and a serious mental illness (SMI) prior to admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility or a significant change of condition) form was completed prior to admission and according to the guidelines specified for 3 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 48, 59 and 60) reviewed. Incomplete or inaccurate PASRR's placed residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or lack of access to specialized services for residents with identified mental health diagnoses or disability. Findings included . <RESIDENT 48> Resident 48 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia, anxiety and depression. According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 08/20/2024, the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 9 sampled residents (Resident 60) reviewed for care planning. The care plan for respiratory care did not show monitoring for signs of hypoxia (low oxygen (O2) level) and administering O2, the skin care plan did not include the type of wound, wound care, or interventions to prevent the wound from worsening, and the Diabetes (a disease in which blood sugar levels are too high) care plan did not include interventions for hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) or hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified outcomes or goals, inconsistent or lack of interventions, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 60 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include a Stage 2 pressure ulcer (a partial thickness skin loss that appears as a shallow open wound with a red or pink wound bed), diabetes, and respiratory failure.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and revised for 3 of 8 (Residents 13, 2 and 28) sampled residents reviewed for care plan revisions. Failure to revise care plans to accurately reflect resident conditions and needs placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . <RESIDENT 13> Resident 13 initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and recently readmitted from the hospital on [DATE]. During an observation and interview on 10/07/2024 at 9:05 AM, Resident 13 was lying in bed. Resident 13 stated they had had a decline in their ADL (activities of daily living) abilities over the past six months. Review of a nurse practitioner note, dated 05/21/2024, showed that Resident 13 likely had kidney failure. The note showed the provider spoke with Resident 13 and they did not want to go to the hospital and wanted to remain in the facility on comfort care. The note showed that Resident 13 was no longer feeding themselves or performing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dentures prior to meals for 1 of 5 sample residents (Resident 31) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This failure placed the resident at risk for poor nutrition, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, revised date of 09/10/2024, showed that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Resident 31 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia and hemiparesis (conditions that cause weakness or paralysis on one side of the body) following stroke, diabetes mellitus (a chronic disease that occurs when the body doesn't produce enough insulin or can't use insulin properly), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), aphasia following cerebral infarction (a language disorder affects a person's ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and provide care and treatment to improve a resident's communication deficit for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 12) reviewed for hearing. Failure to accurately assess, provide interventions to mitigate hearing loss, and/or offer a referral to improve a hearing deficit placed residents at risk of a decreased quality of life. Findings included . According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.19.1, dated October 2024, (a guide to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment). The completed MDS must be analyzed and combined with other relevant information to develop an individualized care plan. To help nursing facilities apply assessment data collected on the MDS, Care Area Assessments (CAAs) are triggered responses to items coded on the MDS specific to a resident's possible problems, needs or strengths. Care Area Assessment (CAA) is the further investigation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a dementia care plan that addressed the significant mental and psychosocial needs of the resident, established personalized and achievable goals, and identified interventions to promote a person-centered environment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 48) reviewed for dementia care. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet psychosocial needs, increased behaviors and decreased quality of life. Findings included . In an email interview on 10/11/2024 at 12:56 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing, stated the only policy the facility had regarding dementia was a policy that specified education, for staff. Review of the facility policy titled Dementia Required Education, dated 09/22/2023, showed the facility had a policy that specified the facility would provide staff training and education. Resident 48 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia, anxiety and depression. According to the admission Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 residents (Residents 60 and 48) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) as required. The facility failed to ensure there were valid and accurate diagnoses for use of psychotropic medications, appropriate indications for treatment with antipsychotic medications, to monitor adverse side effects and monitor and document appropriate behaviors. These failures placed the residents at risk for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications, for adverse medication-related side effects, and for diminished quality of life. Findings included According to the facility policy titled Psychotropic Medication Informed Consent Policy, reviewed on 09/16/2024: Other medications not classified as anti-psychotic, anti-depressant, anti-anxiety, or hypnotic medications can also affect brain activity and should not be used as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental services were coordinated for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 17) reviewed for dental services. Failure to follow up on dental referrals and ensure the coordination of dental services for residents who had missing and broken teeth placed the residents at increased risk for difficulty chewing, associated health complications, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 17 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included weakness, diabetes mellitus type two (condition in which the body had trouble controlling blood sugar), and arthropathic psoriasis (a type of arthritis that affects people with the skin condition psoriasis). In an interview on 10/07/2024 at 9:17 AM, Resident 17 stated they needed a dentist to have their teeth replaced and fixed. Review of the dental hygienist consultation report dated 12/06/2023 showed Resident 17 requested to see a dentist to address missing teeth, broken teeth, and a failing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an orderly discharge for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 5 and 2) reviewed for discharges. The failure to provide necessary information on discharge, and to document and/or assist residents with setting up follow-up physician appointments placed them at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . RESIDENT 5 Resident 5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses to include a cognitive communication deficit (difficulty thinking and how someone uses language). Review of Resident 5's Discharge Summary Information, dated 04/11/2024, showed there was no documentation regarding Follow-up Physician Care after their stay at the facility. The section of the form for their Primary Care Provider/Address/Phone #/whether an appointment had been made/to call to schedule an appointment was all left blank. <RESIDENT 2> The resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include a cognitive communication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional supplements for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 and 4) reviewed for nutrition. The failure to provide nutritional supplements that had been recommended by the registered dietitian placed residents at risk for delayed wound healing. Findings included . <RESIDENT 1> Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include protein-calorie malnutrition (inadequate protein in the diet). The resident developed a Stage 3 pressure injury (full thickness tissue loss) while a resident in the facility. Review of Resident 1's Nutrition Assessment, dated 01/30/2024, showed the Registered Dietitian's (RD) plan was to supplement the resident with Prosource (protein supplement) 30 ml (milliliters) every day for wound healing. The assessment indicated the resident's oral intake was likely not meeting their nutrient needs for protein and for wound healing, and the resident would benefit from high protein supplements. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were complete and accurate for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 1 and 3) reviewed for wound care. The failure to ensure clinical records were complete and accurate placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings included . <RESIDENT 1> Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident developed a Stage 3 pressure injury (full thickness tissue loss) on their right buttocks while a resident in the facility. Review of the wound healing consultant's progress note, dated 02/15/2024, showed Collateral Contact 1 (CC1), Physician Assistant recommended the dressing change to Resident 1's pressure injury wound be done every seven days, and as needed for accidental removal, saturation and/or soiling. Review of Resident 1's February 2024 Medication Administration Records/Treatment Administration Records (MARS/TARS), showed the facility did implement CC1's the wound care practitioner's recommendations to change the dressing, but they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were provided to meet the residents need for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1) reviewed. The failure to ensure medications were acquired and administered as ordered on the day of admission to the facility and follow facility process for medications not available placed residents at risk of diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cancer, failure to thrive (FTT - when a resident has a loss of appetite, eats and drinks less than usual, loses weight, and is less active than normal), severe protein-calorie malnutrition (the body lacks enough protein and energy to function properly), depression, and anxiety. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], showed dronabinol / Marinol (a medication made from marijuana to control nausea and vomiting) was ordered to take two times daily before meals. Review of Resident 1's hospital transfer orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure reported concerns were addressed and investigated timely for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for grievances. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cancer in the lower lobe of left bronchus or lung, encounter for anticancer chemotherapy, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition (the body lacks enough protein and energy to function properly), major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident 1's Care Conference/Progress Note dated 01/03/2024, showed the following care concerns were discussed: 1) lack of communication related to medication administration, 2) nutrition, 3) laundry, and 4) activity of daily living. The Resident Care Manager (RCM) was to implement an in-service following the care conference. Review of the January 2024 Grievance log showed no grievances for Resident 1. In a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure critical laboratory (lab) test results were reported and followed up timely for 1 of 2 resident (2) reviewed for laboratory services. This failure placed residents at risk of medical complications from lack of timely follow up for a chronic medical condition. Findings included . Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include chronic anemia (a condition in which the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), thrombocytopenia (a condition that occurs when the platelet count in the blood is too low. Platelets are tiny blood cells that are made in the bone marrow from larger cells) and myelomonocytic leukemia (cancer of the blood). Review of a Complete Blood Count (CBC-a type of lab test), lab report with Resident 3's name showed the lab specimen was collected on 01/03/2024. The specimen was received on 01/04/2024 and the results were faxed to the facility on [DATE] at 12:37 PM. The top of the report had a facsimile date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-15 · tag F0660 — pattern
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered discharge planning process/care plan comprehensively and effectively for 4 of 4 residents (Resident 26, 31, 57 and 59), when reviewed for discharge planning. Failure to initiate a discharge plan consistent with the resident's expressed desires, goals, and barriers to discharge, placed the resident at risk for unsafe discharge, and could negatively impact the resident's sense of self-worth and quality of life. Findings included . A review of facility policy titled, Transfers and Discharges, dated 08/09/2023, showed the comprehensive care plan should contain the resident's goals for admission and desired outcomes, which should be in alignment with the discharge if it is resident-initiated. <RESIDENT 26> Resident 26 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to included atrial fibrillation (rapid heart rate), acute kidney failure, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and repeated falls. Review of Resident 26's discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that maintained and promoted dignity for 1 of 16 (Resident 10) sampled residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident 10's medication concern was reviewed with the Director of Nurses Services (Staff B) and follow up information regarding the medication concern was discussed with the resident, which caused embarrassment and low self-esteem for the resident. This failure placed residents at risk for diminished self-worth, self-esteem, and feelings of embarrassment. Findings included . Review of the facilities policy titled, Dignity, dated 09/30/22, documented The Resident has the right to a be treated with respect and dignity . Resident 10 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included anxiety, hypothyroidism, and depression. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 08/24/2023, showed Resident 10's cognition was intact.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents code status was accurately documented in all areas of the medical record for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 17). This failure placed the residents at risk for diminished quality of life, end-of-life care, or health care decisions which potentially did not reflect their wishes. Findings included . Review of Resident 17's Portable Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form, dated [DATE], located under the Documents tab of the hard chart, revealed the resident had selected to attempt resuscitation/cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event they had no pulse and was not breathing. Review of Resident 17's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the header section of the chart read, Code Status: DO NOT RESUSCITATE Selective Treatment. Review of an order, dated [DATE], revealed Resident 17 had an order for DO NOT RESUSCITATE Selective Treatment. The order was created by Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Care Manager. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5residents (Resident 60) reviewed for unnecessary medications did not receive unnecessary medications. Resident 60 was admitted to the facility with an as needed (prn) order for Zyprexa, an antipsychotic medication, and the order was changed to a scheduled dose without a physician documented rationale. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, reviewed 10/24/2022, revealed Psychotropic drugs include but are not limited to antipsychotics . psychotropic medication is prescribed for a diagnosed condition . the facility should not use psychotropic medications to address behaviors without first determining if there is a medical, physical, functional, psychological, social or environmental cause of the resident's behaviors. Review of the facility's policy titled, Unnecessary Medication, reviewed 08/09/2023, revealed, . the facility will ensure only medications required to treat the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 medication carts (Quilceda Unit, Cart 2) medication was secured and not left unattended. One nurse (Staff C, Registered Nurse) left medications ready for administration unattended on top of the medication cart. This failure placed medications at risk of being tampered with or diverted by a passerby. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage and Expiration of Dating medication, biologicals, revised 07/21/22, revealed . Facility should ensure that medications . are securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by residents and visitors . During an observation on 09/14/2023 at 4:19 PM, the medication cart 2 on the Quilceda Unit was parked in between Resident 25 and Resident 36's rooms. A medication cup containing what appeared to be yogurt with crushed medications was noted on top of the medication cart. No nursing staff were present at the medication cart. At 4:20 PM, Staff C exited Resident 25's room and was interviewed. Staff C…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 31) reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility failed to ensure there was complete and accurate documentation in the clinical record related to Resident 31's hospitalization. Failure to ensure the medical record was complete and accurately documented placed residents at risk for inconsistent care and treatment. Findings included . Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include multiple fractures related to a fall, and end stage kidney disease on dialysis. Review of a progress note, dated 09/07/2023 a late entry for 09/04/2023, showed Staff B, Director of Nursing Services (DNS), documented Resident 31 was sent to the hospital from the dialysis center on 08/30/2023. In an interview on 09/15/2023 at 10:52 AM, Staff N, Licensed Practical Nurse, stated if a resident was transferred to the hospital by an outside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$95,001 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $12,425 — penalty dated 2025-06-17
  • $82,576 — penalty dated 2023-08-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Garden Terrace At Overland ParkOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Hammond-Whiting Care CenterWhiting, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of AndoverAndover, KS 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Cape GirardeauCape Girardeau, MO 1 of 5Life Care Center Of GrayGray, TN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of HixsonHixson, TN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Mount VernonMount Vernon, WA 1 of 5Life Care Center Of RenoReno, NV 1 of 5Life Care Center Of Sierra VistaSierra Vista, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center Of The WillowsValparaiso, IN 1 of 5Life Care Center Of TucsonTucson, AZ 1 of 5Life Care Center of Coeur d'AleneCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Life Care Center of ElkhornElkhorn, NE 1 of 5Life Care Center of Hilton HeadHilton Head Island, SC 1 of 5Life Care Center of OmahaOmaha, NE 1 of 5Life Care Center of PlainwellPlainwell, MI 1 of 5Life Care Ctr Of LawrencevilleLawrenceville, GA 1 of 5Rensselaer Care CenterRensselaer, IN 2 of 5Canon Lodge Care CenterCanon City, CO 2 of 5Darcy Hall Of Life CareWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Desert Cove Nursing CenterChandler, AZ 2 of 5Evergreen Nursing HomeAlamosa, CO 2 of 5Garden Terrace Healthcare Center of HoustonHouston, TX 2 of 5Hallmark ManorFederal Way, WA 2 of 5Lane House, TheCrawfordsville, IN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Altamonte SpringsAltamonte Springs, FL 2 of 5Life Care Center Of AthensAthens, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BridgetonBridgeton, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of BrookfieldBrookfield, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ClevelandCleveland, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of ColumbiaColumbia, SC 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Coos BayCoos Bay, OR 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Federal WayFederal Way, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of GrandviewGrandview, MO 2 of 5Life Care Center Of KirklandKirkland, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Merrimack ValleyBillerica, MA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Morgan CountyWartburg, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of PuyallupPuyallup, WA 2 of 5Life Care Center Of Red BankChattanooga, TN 2 of 5Life Care Center Of South Las VegasLas Vegas, NV

Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CASCADE MEDICAL INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 08/06/2015
DEVELOPERS INVESTMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/06/2015
BUTNER, NANCYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/16/2018
CROES, SHAUNAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/28/2025
ESPINOZA BELTRAN, REGULOIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/24/2025
HENRY, TERRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/24/2015
LAY, LISAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/09/2018
SWANKER, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2022
CROSS, CINDYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/24/2015
THURMOND, JOANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/24/2015
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/24/2025
BHUMKAR, NISHITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/07/2025
FLETCHER, TODDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/13/2024
PRESTON, AUBREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/13/2024
ZIEGLER, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/13/2024
PRESTON, FORRESTIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2000

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 21%Other / private 22%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$461per resident / day
operating cost
$14,022per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$459per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505386. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next