Life Care Center Of South Hill

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 1,554 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 87.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 644 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 97.6 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.16 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.14 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.29 to 0.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-10-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ordered medication, significant to the health of the resident, for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 27) reviewed for medication administration. Resident 27 experienced harm when they developed stroke like symptoms and was emergently transferred to the hospital for a change in condition. The facility has corrected the above deficiency prior to the standard survey and constituted as past non-compliance (the facility was not in compliance at the time the incident occurred; however there was sufficient evidence the facility corrected the non-compliance after it was identified) and is no longer outstanding. Findings included . Review of Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice, Eighth Ed., 2006, showed an anticoagulant (blood thinning) medication can be used to disrupt the blood's natural clotting function, when there is a risk of blood clots forming. Such a risk is present with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (A-fib, an abnormal heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate, investigate, and resolve a grievance for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 142) when reviewed for grievances. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of comfort and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 142 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (condition that happens when your heart is unable to pump blood well enough to give your body a normal supply) and chronic kidney disease (condition where the kidneys are damaged and unable to filter blood). Resident 142 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 11/17/2025 at 3:05 PM, Resident 142 stated they did not have enough room in their bed to turnover comfortably. Resident 142 stated they had requested a larger bed upon admission however they did not get a response.Review of the EHR showed a progress noted dated 10/31/2025, the progress note stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement safety interventions to ensure safety from potential further abuse for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 143) when reviewed for abuse. This failure placed the resident at risk for physical harm, mental anguish, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 143 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interfere with daily functioning), anxiety (feeling of worried thoughts) and depression (feeling of sadness and/or loss of interest). Resident 143 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 11/18/2025 at 9:42 AM, Resident 143 stated they would like to share a room with their spouse who was also a resident in the facility (Resident 306). Resident 143 stated their Power of Attorney (POA) had also spoken to the facility about the concern; however, Resident 143 did not know the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop care plans for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 126) when reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Failure to care plan Resident 126's bowel functions and half a side rail equipment placed the Residents at risk of avoidable injuries, loss of functions and diminished quality of life. Findings included. Resident 126 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include malnutrition, diabetes (high blood sugar), anemia (low red blood cells) and depression. Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) an assessment tool, dated 10/25/2025, showed Resident 126 was able to communicate needs. During an observation and interview on 11/18/2025 at 9:50 AM, Resident 126 stated they had a fall trying to go to the bathroom, and they use the half side rails in bed for mobility. Resident 126 was sitting next to their bed and was pointing towards the rails on the bed. Resident 126 stated they had diarrhea (multiple loose stools) all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide ordered bowel medications for constipation per provider's orders for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 136 and 124) when reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed the residents at risk for decreased comfort and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 136Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 136 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of recent spinal surgery. The resident was able to make needs known. Review of the bowel management documentation showed Resident 136 did not have a bowel movement (BM) from 11/07/2025 through 11/12/2025. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) for November 2025 showed no as needed bowel medications were offered to Resident 136. Resident 124Review of the EHR showed Resident 124 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia. The resident was unable to make needs known. Review of the bowel management documentation showed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and implement residents' fluid restrictions for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 132) when reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed residents at risk of fluid overload, discomfort, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 132 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include end stage renal disease (the kidneys can no longer filter waste and excess fluid from the blood), muscle weakness, and diabetes (too much sugar in the blood). Resident 132 was able to make needs known. During an interview and observation on 11/17/2025 at 12:48 PM, Resident 132 stated they had a fluid restriction, was not sure how much, and facility staff did not monitor their fluid intake. Observation showed Resident 132 had a measured cup with 500 millimeters (ml) of fluid and an empty coffee mug on their overbed table. Review of provider's orders showed an order, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 121) reviewed for respiratory care. Failure to follow provider's orders for oxygen (O2) therapy placed the resident at risk for unmet needs and potential negative outcomes. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 121 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (condition that happens when your heart is unable to pump blood well enough to give your body a normal supply) and a fractured vertebra (broken bone in the spine). Resident 121 was able to make needs known. Review of Resident 121's care plan, dated 11/13/2025, showed no intervention for oxygen therapy. Observation on 11/17/2025 at 10:40 AM showed Resident 121 received O2 set to 6 liters (L) per minute via a nasal canula (device to deliver O2 through a tube into the nose). Review of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications in 1 of 6 halls (700 hall) when reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed residents at risk for medication errors, ineffective treatment, and diminished quality of life. Findings included .Observation on 11/17/2025 at 11:12 AM showed room [ROOM NUMBER] with a medicine cup on the bedside table with three pills. Resident 92 stated one of the pills was an antibiotic but did not know what the others were. During an interview on 11/17/2025 at 11:31 AM, Staff H, Registered Nurse, stated they would leave medications with the resident when they were refusing. During an interview on 11/17/2025 at 11:16 AM, Staff D, Resident Care Manager, stated the medications should not been left at bedside. During an interview on 11/21/2025 at 8:04 AM, Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse, stated the process for medication administration was when a resident refused, the nurse was to dispose of the medication and reapproach later.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice regarding placement of an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine). This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs, pain, and medical complications Findings included . The facility policy for Indwelling Urinary Catheter (Foley) Management, revised 06/27/2023 and reviewed 09/04/2025, documented the facility would ensure that, for residents admitted with a urinary catheter, staff would adhere to professional standards of practice protocols and infection prevention and control procedures for insertion, ongoing care and catheter removal. The policy referenced [NAME] on Procedural Guidance on Routine care for indwelling urinary catheter (Foley) care and management. According to Lippincott Nursing Procedures (8th ed.) (2019). Wolters Kluwer, after insertion of a urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to include all required services in the plan of care for 3 of 20 sampled residents (Residents 40, 42, and 226) when reviewed for comprehensive care plan. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving required services, staff being unaware of how to assist residents, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 40 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of ankylosing spondylitis (a type of arthritis that affects the spine and other parts of the body) and pneumonia (a lung infection). Review of provider's orders showed Resident 40 had an order for a fluid restriction. Review of Resident 40's care plan, initiated 09/26/2024, showed no information related to a fluid restriction. During an interview on 10/30/2024 at 9:54 AM, Staff R, Licensed Practical Nurse/Resident Care Manager, stated residents on a fluid restriction should have a care focus area for it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor and document bowel movements and implement the bowel program as needed for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 177, 176 and 40) reviewed for care and services. These failures placed the residents at risk for worsening condition, discomfort, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of a policy document titled, Bowel Protocol, dated 09/16/2024, showed the facility should provide effective interventions for signs and symptoms of constipation that were consistent with current standards of practice. The nursing staff was to record, in the electronic health record (EHR), each time a resident had a bowel movement (BM). In addition, the facility, in coordination with the resident's provider, would implement standing orders to address a lack of a BM. Resident 177 Review of Resident 177's entry minimum data set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 09/22/2024, showed the resident readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,388 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $17,388 — penalty dated 2025-11-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA