Life Care Center Of Richland
44 Goethals Drive, Richland, WA 99352 · For profit - Corporation · 104 certified beds · (509) 943-1117 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
- it has 5 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (73) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $109,736 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-23)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.4% | 14.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.4% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 1.0% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.1% | 1.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.1% | 17.7% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 2.6% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.8% | 17.2% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.3% | 12.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.2% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.0% | 22.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.7% | 15.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.5% | 82.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.1% | 19.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.9% | 13.4% | 12.0% | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 256 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 77.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.8%CMS range 48.6–59.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 8.0–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 77.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 69.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 68.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.2%CMS range 3.3–7.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.05 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 68.6 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.11 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
73 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 58 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to 1) recognize a change in condition for 3 of 6 residents (Residents 39, 9 and 35) reviewed for quality of care, and 2) ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and physician orders for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 8 and 71) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for a delay in treatment, unmet care needs, and negative health outcomes. Resident 39 experienced harm when the facility failed to recognize the immediacy of a change of condition and did not notify the physician with a resident who exhibited signs and symptoms of change in orientation, oxygen level, blood pressure and pulse which resulted in hospitalization. Resident 9 experienced harm when their nephrostomy tube (a flexible tube inserted through the skin into the kidney to drain urine externally when normal drainage is blocked) became obstructed, resulting in hospitalization intervention.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify and take timely action when a change of condition after a fall occurred for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for changes in condition. Resident 1 experienced harm due to right hip pain and a delay in medical treatment for a fractured right hip. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart problems. Review of the resident's comprehensive assessment, dated 09/10/2024, showed they had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the resident's plan of care, dated 09/04/2024, showed they required two staff to turn and reposition in bed, toileting and transfers; and one staff to assist with dressing and personal hygiene. Review of a facility investigation form, dated 09/11/2024 at 9:30 PM, showed Resident 1 was found by staff lying on the floor. Resident 1 stated they were trying to go to the bathroom and lost their balance upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently assess, perform dressing changes as ordered, and implement wound provider recommendations timely for application of a wound treatment device for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 2), reviewed for pressure injuries (PIs - injury to the skin and underlying tissue due to prolonged pressure). The facility failed to timely monitor, assess, implement wound provider recommendations, and perform dressing changes as ordered. This failed practice resulted in harm to Resident 2, when they experienced worsening/deterioration of the PI to the sacrum (the triangular bone at the base of the spine that connects the lower back to the pelvis). Findings included . Review of the National PI Advisory Panel's (NPIAP, the leading expert in PIs/wounds) guidelines and definitions, dated September 2016, defined PI stages as follows: Stage 1 PI had intact skin with a localized area of non-blanchable erythema (redness). Stage 2 PI was a partial thickness skin loss with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to consistently monitor and develop planned interventions for edema (swelling caused by too much fluid in the tissues), monitor weight gain and effectiveness of diuretic therapy (medications that help reduce fluid buildup in the body) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for changes in condition. Resident 1 experienced harm due to a decline in their mobility and delay in receiving medical treatment. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with diagnoses which included congestive heart failure (CHF - a weakened heart that causes fluid buildup in feet, arms and lungs), heart and lung disease. Review of the 11/20/2023 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 1 had moderate impairment in their cognition; required supervision or touching assistance with upper body dressing, personal hygiene, walking 10 feet, chair/bed to chair transfers and sit to stand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe transfer utilizing the sit-to-stand lift (a mechanical lift used to assist residents that have difficulty standing up on their own) for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 1 and 2), reviewed for resident's that used a sit-to-stand transfer device. Resident 1 experienced a left arm fracture when they slipped out of the mechanical lift device during the transfer from their bed to the wheelchair when the waist support strap was not tightly secured. This failure placed other residents at risk for injury, falls, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility policy titled Transfer using a Sit to Stand Mechanical Lift, last reviewed on 09/15/2023, showed the facility will ensure two staff members are present during the transfer of residents that required a mechanical lift. The policy also showed when staff utilized the support slings, they must be snug, and comfortable or the resident could slide out of the sling.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely notification of changes in a resident's condition for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls. Specifically, a nursing assistant failed to promptly report a resident's fall, resulting in delayed assessment, monitoring, intervention, and required notifications. This failure placed the residents at risk for undetected or worsening injuries, delayed medical intervention, and serious complications.Findings included. Review of a policy titled, Change in Status, Identifying and Communicating, Long Term Care, revised 09/15/2026, showed every health care team member is responsible for communicating a resident's change in status from baseline. However, the nursing assistant is typically the first to notice a change in a resident's status because the nursing assistant usually spends more time with the resident than other health care team members.a nursing assistant who notices such status changes should immediately report them to a nurse.vague, subjective communication may lead to misdiagnosis and delayed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0729 — isolatedVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing assistants were verified on the state Nurse Aide Registry prior to start of employment for 1 of 3 staff (Staff D) reviewed for staff qualification and background review. This failure placed the residents at risk for poor care, injury, and negative outcomes.Findings included. Review of a policy titled, Abuse - Screening of Employees and Residents, reviewed 04/01/2026, showed the facility may not employ individuals that had been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment, or have had a finding entered into the State nurse aide registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents, or misappropriation of property, or have a disciplinary action in effect against their professional license by a state licensure body. Record review of a personnel file for Staff D, Nursing Assistant (NA), showed they were hired on 03/26/2026. There was no documentation that they were on the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act registry [(OBRA) a state-operated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan [(BCP) an initial, temporary plan of care, developed within 48 hours of admission to ensure immediate safety and continuity of care] that included the essential needs, physician orders, social services, and Preadmission Screening and Resident Review [(PASARR) - a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals were not inappropriately placed in nursing homes] recommendations for 3 of 3 residents (Resident 1, 2, and 3) reviewed for baseline care plan. This failure placed the residents at risk for immediate health and safety concerns.Findings included. Review of a policy titled, Baseline Care Plan, reviewed 08/29/2025, showed the facility must develop and implement a BCP for each resident that included instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care that met professional standards of quality care. The BCP must be developed within 48 hours of admission and include the minimum healthcare information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed when nursing staff failed to accurately transcribe and follow physician orders for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed the residents at risk for a delay in receiving medications, medication errors, and adverse outcomes. Findings included. Review of the Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice, 11th edition, copyright 2019, Chapter 2, showed professional nursing had standards of practice that set minimum levels of acceptable performance for which practitioners were accountable. Departure of standards of care included failure to implement a provider's order properly or in a timely fashion, failure to make prompt, accurate entries in a medical record, and failure to adhere to facility policy or procedural guidelines. Review of a policy titled, Medication Reconciliation Across the Continuum of Care, revised 09/09/2025, showed upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered physical therapy (PT) was received in a timely manner for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 and 2) reviewed for specialized rehabilitation services. This failure placed the residents at risk for decline in function and/or not achieving the highest practicable level of physical, mental, and functional well-being. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Specialized Rehabilitative Services, revised 09/04/2025, showed the facility would ensure that each resident received specialized rehabilitative services to assist them to attain, maintain, or restore their highest level of physical, mental, functional and psychosocial well-being. Resident 1Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure with hypoxia (a serious condition where body tissues don't get enough oxygen), metabolic encephalopathy (a change in how your brain works due to an underlying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an incident involving a missing resident to the administrator, local law enforcement, and the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for missing residents. This failure disallowed the administrator to conduct a thorough investigation, local law enforcement to assist in the search for Resident 1, and lack of oversight from the SA.Findings included. A review of the Nursing Home Guidelines or The Purple Book, dated October 2015, showed that facilities were required to report a missing resident to Law Enforcement and the State Agency Hotline. Resident 1Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including aftercare for hip replacement surgery, bipolar disorder (a lifelong mental health condition causing extreme mood swings, from manic highs [euphoria, high energy, impulsivity] to depressive lows [sadness, fatigue, hopelessness], significantly affecting energy, mood, and daily functioning), and anxiety. The 11/01/2025 comprehensive assessment showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge plan that included education for care and maintenance of an indwelling urinary catheter ([IUC] a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain the urine) and ensuring home health services were provided for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for discharge planning. This failure placed the resident at risk of serious injury, rehospitalization, and lack of necessary care and services after discharge.Findings included. Review of the policy titled, Discharge Planning Process, reviewed 08/29/2025, showed the process included caregiver support and referrals to local contact agencies. The process focused on the residents' discharge goals and preparation for the residents to effectively transition them to post-discharge care. Document any referrals to local agencies/appropriate entities based on the residents' choices. Resident 3Review of the medical record showed Resident 3 was admitted to the facility with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and notification to administrative staff and local law enforcement for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for elopement. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for serious injury and/or exposure to the elements.Findings included. Review of a policy titled, Missing Residents/Actual Elopement Event, reviewed 04/03/2024, showed elopement occurred when a resident left the facility without authorization (an order for discharge or leave of absence) and/or necessary supervision. A resident with decision making capability's, who chose to leave the facility intentionally would not be considered an elopement unless the facility is unaware of the resident's departure and/or whereabouts. If staff were unable to account for the whereabouts of a resident during the course of the day, the sign out log should be reviewed to determine if the resident/representative had signed out of the facility. The Executive Director or representative and department heads would be notified that the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who had an indwelling urinary catheter (IUC, a tube placed in the bladder which drains urine out into a collection bag) received care and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI, a condition were bacteria enter through the urinary meatus [a passage or opening leading to the interior of the body] and infect the kidneys or bladder) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 2), reviewed for urinary catheter care. This failure placed the residents at risk of developing serious medical complications, secondary to an infection in the bladder.Findings included. Review of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention document titled, Indwelling Urinary Catheter Culture Stewardship: Overview, dated 03/14/2024, showed if the IUC had been in place for longer than 14 days, the IUC should be replaced prior to specimen collection. Further review showed never collect a urine culture from the collection bag. Review of a policy titled, Indwelling Urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement (a resident leaving the facility unsupervised and undetected) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for avoidable accidents. This failure placed the residents at risk for exposure to extreme weather temperatures, serious injury, and/or death. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Incident and Reportable Event Management, revised 08/15/2023, showed an avoidable accident was an accident that occurred when the facility failed to implement interventions, including adequate supervision consistent with the resident's needs, goals, care plan, and current professional standards of practice to eliminate and/or reduce the risk of an accident. <Resident 1>Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including broken pelvic bones, Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disorder that gradually impairs memory, thinking, and the ability to carry out simple tasks), and difficulty walking with a history of falls.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 58 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring assistance with showers, oral care, and nail care, were provided timely assistance according to their needs and preference for 6 of 10 sampled residents (Residents 11, 35, 13, 82, 9, and 26) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). This failed practice placed residents at risk of infection, decreased dignity, and a decreased quality of life. Findings Included . <Resident 11> Review of the resident’s medical records showed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include Alzheimer disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys a person’s memory and thinking skills). The 06/26/2025 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 11’s cognition was severely impaired and was dependent upon staff for bathing and personal hygiene. During an interview on 07/16/2025 at 9:13 AM, the Resident Representative (RR) of Resident 11 stated they would arrive to the facility between 6:30 AM and 7:00 AM daily and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing levels in order to provide care and services needed for 8 of 10 residents (Residents 11, 35, 13, 82, 9, 26, 8, and 18) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), restorative therapy, and specialized therapy services (therapy that improves performing daily tasks, mobility and function). This failed practice placed residents at risk for an undignified existence and unmet care and service's needs. Findings included.<ADLs><Resident 11>Review of the resident's medical records showed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys a person's memory and thinking skills). During an interview and concurrent observation on 07/16/2025 at 9:13 AM, showed Resident 11 had a build up of a white substance between their teeth and the Resident Representative (RR) stated they wanted the resident to receive showers more than twice a week. The RR stated they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and discard medications when medications were not in use and when medications have expired on 2 of 2 medication carts (Team 1 and 2 medication carts) and 1 of 2 medication rooms (Team 2), reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medication. Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals dated 12/01/2007, showed the facility should ensure medications and biologicals: (1) have an expired date on the label, (2) have been retained longer than recommended by manufacturer or supplier guidelines, and (3) have been contaminated or deteriorated, are stored separate from other medications until destroyed or returned to the pharmacy or supplier. <Team 1> An observation of the Team 1 medication cart on 07/22/2025 at 11:00 AM, with Staff D Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to inform the Resident Representative (RR) of changes in the resident's pain medication regimen for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 57) reviewed for an order change for pain medication. This failure disallowed the RR to make an informed decision concerning the resident's care needs.Findings Included .<Resident 57> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of a right hip fracture, muscle weakness, seizures and dementia (cognitive impairment). The 07/01/2025 nursing assessment/ care plan showed Resident 57 was totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living to include bed mobility and transfers to a wheelchair. Resident 57's pain medication orders included a narcotic pain reliever which was discontinued on 07/10/2025. Tylenol (a non-narcotic pain reliever) was started on 07/10/2025 as needed. A 07/12/2025 order was initiated for Robaxin (a muscle relaxant) initiated three times a day on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical appropriateness for safe self-administration of medication, leaving medications at bedside for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 82), reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed the residents at risk for medication errors and adverse medication interactions. Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Administration of Medications, dated 09/16/2024, showed, the facility would ensure medications were administered safely and appropriately per physician order to address residents' diagnoses and signs and symptoms.<Resident 82> Review of the resident's medical record showed Resident 82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart failure, diabetes (a disease in which the body does not control glucose [a type of sugar] in the blood), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident 82's comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], showed the resident's cognition was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2025-07-23 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quarterly financial statements for resident trust accounts were provided in accordance with generally accepted standards of accounting practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 6), reviewed for trust accounts. Failure to provide resident /resident representative's quarterly financial statements for the months of January, March, November and October 2024, placed the resident at risk for loss of personal funds. Findings included . <Resident 6> Review of the resident's medical record showed Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include bipolar disorder (a brain disorder that causes changes in a person's mood, energy, or ability to function), dementia [the loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning- to the extent that in interferes with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)] and muscle weakness. The comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident's cognition was severely impaired and required the assistance of two staff members…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received their mail for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 8) reviewed for resident rights. This failed practice put the resident at risk of not being able to make independent choices regarding their mail preferences. Findings included. <Resident 8> Review of the resident's medical records showed they admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include bipolar disorder (a mental health disorder that causes extreme mood swings) and diabetes (how the body regulates blood sugar levels). The 07/01/2025 comprehensive assessment showed the resident was cognitively intact and able to make their own decisions. During an interview on 07/16/2025 at 10:15 AM, Resident 8 stated they had not received packages they had ordered from Amazon (an online shopping retailer). Resident 8 stated they had several packages that showed as delivered but they had not received them yet. During an interview and concurrent observation on 07/17/2025 at 4:14 PM, Resident 8 stated they had still not received their packages and asked to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances (resident and/or resident representative concerns that can be voiced or written) conveyed during resident council meetings (a meeting of the facility's residents to communicate concerns, request improvements and keep up to date of the facility's activities/events) and individually, underwent prompt resolution through to their conclusion nor were residents appropriately updated on the voiced grievance progress/conclusion for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 77 and 69) reviewed for the grievances process. This failure placed residents at risk for unresolved concerns and unmet care needs.Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Grievances Program (concern and Comment), revised 01/07/2025, showed the facility would have a process in place for identification, investigation and follow-up of resident grievance/concern in a timely manner. Residents could convey grievances verbally or in writing. The policy showed that grievances…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents on psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes, emotions and behavior) had non-pharmacological interventions (alternative treatment of a resident's symptoms that are directed toward understanding, preventing and relieving a resident's distress or loss of abilities and do not involve the use of medications) consistently attempted and were being monitored for individualized behaviors prior to psychotropic administration to reflect adequate need of the medication for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 11 and 71) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at an increased risk for experiencing medication-related adverse side effects, and unmet care needs. Finding included .<Resident 11> Review of the residents’ medical records showed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include anxiety (an intense, excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a patient-centered discharge plan by the interdisciplinary team and document required discharge information for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 45) reviewed for discharge planning. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, worsening of wounds, psychological distress, and rehospitalization. Findings included. Review of the policy titled Transfers and Discharges, dated 04/22/2025, showed the facility would document in the resident's record the appropriate information was communicated to the receiving health care provider. The policy showed the documentation would show the reasons for discharge, infection status, functional status, and risks such as fall risk. <Resident 45> Review of the resident's medical records showed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses of left superficial femoral artery endarterectomy with bovine patch angioplasty (when plaque builds up in the artery, then gets removed and a patch is used to restore…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on written notices of bed holds (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident was absent from the facility) given at the time of hospital transfers, and/or failed to send a copy of the notice of transfers to the representative for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 26 and 1) reviewed for discharge process. This failure placed residents at risk of not being informed of their rights regarding a bed hold and the lack of advocacy. Findings Included . Review of the facility policy dated 04/22/2025, titled Bed-Hold policy, showed the facility would provide written information to the resident or resident representative the nursing facility policy on bed-hold periods and the residents returned to the facility to ensure that residents would be made aware of a facility’s bed-hold and reserve bed payment policy before and upon transfer to a hospital or when taking a therapeutic leave of absence from the facility. <Resident 26> Review of the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the minimum data set assessment (MDS- a comprehensive assessment tool) accurately reflected the status for 2 of 10 sampled residents (Resident 10 and 35) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified care needs. Findings included . <Resident 10> Review of the resident medical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart complications and stroke (blood flow to the brain is blocked or a blood vessel bursts). The 06/30/2025 comprehensive assessment showed the resident was taking an anticoagulant (a type of drug that prevents the blood from clotting as quickly or as effectively as normal) medication. Review of Resident 10's provider orders for June 2025 showed no medication that would meet the criteria for an anticoagulant. <Resident 35> Review of the resident medical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative therapy services, including the use of an orthotic (a device designed to support, align, or correct function of movable parts of the body) were consistently implemented for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 8 and 35) reviewed for restorative therapy. This failure placed the residents at risk for loss of range of motion (ROM, the amount of movement that a joint can achieve in a specific direction), deconditioning (a decline in physical health from prolonged inactivity or illness), and contractures (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen). Findings included. Review of the policy dated 11/19/2024, titled Restorative Nursing, showed the Restorative Nursing program was to promote a resident's ability to adjust and adapt to live as independent and safe as they possibly could. The policy showed .measurable objective and interventions must be documented in the care plan and medical record and the trained Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident 97) reviewed for hydration were consistently monitored and received adequate hydration fluids as per physician orders. This failure placed residents at risk for dehydration, constipation, urinary tract infections (UTI), and other health complications including worsening cognitive impairment and behavioral changes. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy, titled Infusion Therapy-Hypodermoclysis (Subcutaneous Fluids), dated 09/16/2024, showed the facility assures that each resident receive care and services consistent with professional standards of practice. Provide safe administration of infusion fluids by qualified staff, including monitoring the resident status. Review of the Lippincott's journal of nursing titled, Hypodermoclysis (HDC) in Home and Long-term Care Settings dated January 2009, showed Lippincott's standards of practice in nursing were as follows: (1) monitoring the infusion site…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered Occupational (OT, specialized therapy that improves performing daily tasks) or Physical therapy (PT, specialized therapy that improves mobility and function) was received for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 13 and 18) reviewed for therapy services. This failure placed the residents at risk for decline in function, decreased independence, and the worsening or development of contractures (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen). Findings included. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered Occupational (OT, specialized therapy that improves performing daily tasks) or Physical therapy (PT, specialized therapy that improves mobility and function) was received for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 13 and 18) reviewed for therapy services. This failure placed the residents at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement effective measures of their infection prevention and control antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) regarding monitoring of residents prescribed antibiotics to ensure appropriate antibiotic use for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 33) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. This failure increased the risk for development of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO/a bacteria that are resistant to many antibiotics), and unmet care needs related to infections. Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, ASP, dated May 2019, showed that the facility was to .implement a system for monitoring and reviewing antibiotic orders and antibiotic usage to aide in the responsible use of antibiotics . and that the Infection Preventionist (IP) would be responsible for oversight on the ASP. The policy stated that the IP would, verify that antibiotic orders were in compliance with the Loeb Criteria (a checklist that evaluates the resident's signs and symptoms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, accurately assess, and provide sufficient supervision to prevent elopement (a resident leaving the facility unsupervised and undetected) for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 1 and 2) reviewed for elopement. This failure placed the residents at risk for exposure to the elements, serious harm, and/or death. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Unsafe Wandering and Elopement Prevention, dated 12/13/2018 and revised 03/04/2025, showed the facility would ensure residents were assessed to determine the risk of elopement and implement interventions to mitigate the identified risks. <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia (a group of conditions that cause a decline in memory, thinking, language, and problem solving that interferes with daily life), delirium (a serious, sudden change in mental abilities characterized by confused thinking, disorientation, and a decreased awareness of surroundings), attention-deficit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure annual Nurse Aide Certified (NAC) performance reviews were completed for 4 of 4 NACs (Staff A, B, C, D) reviewed who had been employed longer than one year. This failed practice had the potential to negatively affect the competency of those NACs and the quality of care provided to residents. Findings included . <Staff A> Review of Staff A's personnel file showed they were hired by the facility on 10/12/1993. The last performance review was on 10/30/2019 (over five years ago). <Staff B> Review of Staff B's personnel file showed they were hired by the facility on 06/14/2022. There had been no performance reviews completed on Staff B (over two years). <Staff C> Review of Staff C's personnel file showed they were hired by the facility on 12/27/2021. The last performance review was on 03/24/2023 (over one year). <Staff D> Review of Staff D's personnel file showed they were hired by the facility on 02/22/2023. There had been no performance reviews completed on Staff D (over one year). On 12/05/2024 at 11:30 AM, Staff E,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to supervise to ensure the physician's diet order for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) was followed as ordered. This failed practice placed Resident 1 at risk for medical complications due to a choking incident. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 had diagnoses which included difficulty swallowing following a stroke with left sided weakness. Review of Resident 1's comprehensive assessment, dated 09/25/2024, showed they had moderate impairment with cognition. Review of the resident's plan of care, dated 10/09/2024, showed they required assistance with one staff for toileting, turning in bed, dressing and eating to cut up the food items; and two staff for transfers utilizing a sit to stand mechanical device (designed to help those with limited mobility transfer from a seated position to an upright posture, and vice-versa). Review of Resident 1's prescribed diet order, dated 04/25/2023, showed regular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to report an incident of neglect regarding a fall with significant injury to the State agency as required, involving 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for falls. This failed practice placed residents at risk for harm and diminished protection and oversight from the State agency. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse - Reporting and Response - No Crime Suspected, reviewed on 06/17/2024, showed the facility would ensure that all alleged violations involving neglect were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury. <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart problems. Review of the resident's comprehensive assessment, dated 09/10/2024, showed they had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the resident's plan of care, dated 09/04/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an incident of neglect, due to a fracture from a fall, for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for investigations. Despite the significant changes in Resident 1's condition resulting in a hip fracture, and lack of staff assessments and timely medical care, the investigation did not include any statements by Staff C, G, and H. There was no investigation regarding the lack of timely assessments regarding significant changes in the resident's condition, pain medication and lack of obtaining the necessary medical evaluation and treatment. This failed practice placed residents at risk for unrecognized neglect, lack of monitoring, corrective action, and/or a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse - Conducting an Investigation, reviewed on 06/17/2024, showed that allegations of neglect were promptly and thoroughly investigated. The facility would prevent further neglect from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address required documentation for Advanced Directives (AD), a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity) including incorporating ADs into the care planning process for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 22 and 35) reviewed for ADs. These failures placed the residents at risk of losing their right of having their preferences and/or decisions followed regarding their end-of-life care. Findings included . <Resident 22> Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include a stroke (a medical emergency that occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked or reduced) with left sided deficits and acute respiratory failure. The 06/06/2024 comprehensive assessment, showed the resident's cognition was intact. Additionally, the medical record showed Resident 22 did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the identification of physical and verbal abuse, and the protection of residents from their Alleged Perpetrator/Alleged Perpetrators (AP/APs), after allegations of abuse were reported to the facility for 4 of 7 residents (Residents 22, 52, 45, and 54) reviewed for abuse/neglect. This failure placed the residents at risk for further abuse, fear, and unmet care and services. Findings included . <Resident 22> Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident had diagnoses to include a stroke (a medical emergency that occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked or reduced) affecting their left side, heart failure, and acute respiratory failure. The 06/06/2024 comprehensive assessment, showed the resident's cognition was intact and required one to two staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. During an interview on 07/08/2024 at 3:02 PM, Resident 22 stated a few weeks ago they had gotten tangled up in their call light cord and the cord had wrapped around their neck. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse/neglect for 4 of 7 residents (Residents 22, 52, 45, and 54) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure placed the residents at risk for further and unrecognized abuse/neglect and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the policy titled Abuse-Reporting and Response dated 06/17/2024, showed the facility would report alleged violations of mistreatment .neglect, or abuse . The allegations were to be reported immediately, and no later than 2 hours if the allegation involved abuse and no later than 24 hours if the allegation did not involve abuse. The facility would report to the Administrator and the state agency. <Resident 22> Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a stroke (a medical emergency, when blood flow to the brain is blocked or reduced) that affected their left side. The 06/06/2024 showed the resident's cognition was intact and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough investigation had been completed, nor did they ensure the residents were protected from their alleged perpetrator (AP) by not removing the AP from having any further contact with those residents during the investigation phase of the reported allegations of abuse/neglect for 4 of 7 residents (Residents 22, 52, 45, and 54) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The failure to conduct a thorough investigation to rule out root cause, contributing factors, and identifying preventative measures of the abuse/neglect allegations placed the residents at risk for further unmet care needs and psychosocial harm. Review of a policy titled Abuse-Protection of Residents dated 06/17/2024, showed the facility would Prevent further potential abuse, neglect ., or mistreatment while the investigation is in process. The policy further showed the resident should be examined for injury and the AP should be removed from the alleged victim and other residents for ongoing safety and protection. Review of a policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized, comprehensive assessment of an adult's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status) discharge assessment upon discharge, within the required 14-day time period, for 5 of 5 residents (Residents 1, 15, 33, 49, and 51). This failed practice placed residents at risk for not having their needs met upon discharge. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes (a disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time) and pneumonia (An infection of the air sacs in one or both the lungs). The record showed the resident discharged from the facility on 04/30/2024 and a comprehensive discharge assessment had not been completed. <Resident 15> Review of the resident's medical record showed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include a stroke…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that had the minimum requirements documented for dietary orders, physician orders, and treatment plans for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 19, 35, and 50) reviewed for recent admissions. The failed practice placed the resident at risk of not receiving continuity of care and resident centered care needs. Findings included . <Resident 19> Review of the medical record showed Resident 19 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a right hip replacement, diabetes and cardiac disease. The resident's comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 19 required substantial assistance for bed mobility and transfers and was cognitively intact. During an interview with Resident 19 on 07/09/2024 at 11:23 AM, they stated they were discharged from the facility on 02/28/2024 and returned on 03/07/2024 following a scheduled hip replacement. Resident 19 stated they could not recall a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 residents (Residents 5, 6, 13, 14, and 22) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), received adequate showers, grooming, and oral care according to the residents' care plans. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet hygiene needs. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) dated 02/12/2024 showed, the resident would receive assistance as needed to complete ADLs). Any change in the ability to perform ADLs would be reported to the nurse. <Resident #5> Review of the resident's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a stroke with right sided weakness, cardiac disease and depression. Resident 5's most recent comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed they required substantial assistance of one to two caregivers with bed mobility, transfers, dressing and personal hygiene and their cognition was intact. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff maintained components of an infection prevention control program to prevent the development and transmission of infections with, 1) hand hygiene and glove change for 6 of 6 staff (Staff F, T, U, V, LL, and OO) reviewed during resident cares, and isolation precautions requiring hand washing, 2) improper use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in infection isolation rooms (rooms that require the use of PPE), when sorting facility residents laundry, and with self-testing of infectious diseases for 6 of 6 staff (Staff F, T, N, HH, KK, and PP) reviewed for standard precautions with PPE, 3) cleaning and disinfecting of the facility's isolation precaution room (a process used to reduce the transmission of infectious bacteria and organisms in the healthcare setting) without an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) registered disinfectant for 1 of 2 staff (Staff QQ) reviewed for environmental cleaning and disinfecting. These failures placed residents at an increased risk for exposure to cross…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the transfer of funds, from a resident trust account, were completed within 30 days following their discharge for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 316) reviewed for resident trust. This failure placed the resident and/or their representatives at risk for loss of funds and the interest accumulated. Findings included . <Resident 316> Review of the resident's medical records showed they were admitted on [DATE] with lung complications and lower back pain. Additionally, the resident was discharged [DATE]. Review of facility trust fund account reports, dated 06/21/2024, showed the remaining balances of monies ($165.01), in the form of a check, was sent to Resident 316 (37 days after the resident had discharged ) through the mail. During an interview on 07/09/2024 at 8:20 AM, Staff DD, Business Office Manager, stated that resident funds were to be transferred to the resident within 30 days of discharging from the facility. Staff DD stated, missed it in this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a quiet, comfortable and homelike environment for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 218) reviewed for homelike environment. This failure placed the residents at risk for fatigue, unwanted noise at night, and a non-homelike environment. Findings included . <Noise Level> An observation on 07/12/2024 at 3:49 AM, night shift, in the 100-hallway showed there were loud noises from TV's and music playing while the facility residents were trying to sleep. An observation on 07/12/2024 at 4:18 AM showed Resident 218 asked Staff Y, Nursing Assistant (NA)to please ask their neighbor in the next room to turn down their television. Resident 218 stated it has been on like that all night. Staff Y stated that they would try to have their neighbor turn down their TV. Staff Y went into the next room and asked the neighbor if they would turn down their TV. The neighbor did turn down their TV, but the TV continued to be loud enough to be heard from the hallway. In an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement 5 of 8 components (identify, protect, report, investigate, and coordinate with quality assurance performance improvement [QAPI] of their abuse/neglect policy/procedure for 4 of 7 residents (Residents 22, 53, 45, and 54) reviewed for allegations of abuse/neglect. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the development of their abuse/neglect policy/procedure by not including Coordination with QAPI component. This failure placed the residents at risk for unrecognized abuse, and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the abuse policies dated 06/17/2024, showed no policy or procedures for communicating and coordinating allegations of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation with the QAPI program. Review of a policy titled Abuse-Protection of Residents dated 06/17/2024, showed the facility would prevent further abuse, neglect, or mistreatment while the allegation was being investigated. The policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a written notice to the resident and/or their representative of the discharge for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 14 and 51) reviewed for hospitalization. In addition, the facility failed to properly notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (a person who advocates for residents in nursing homes). This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet discharge needs. Findings included . Review of the policy titled Transfers and Discharges dated 06/28/2024, showed the facility would provide a transfer and/or discharge notice to the resident or the resident's responsible party. The policy did not show the notice needed to be sent to the Office of the State LTC Ombudsman as well. <Resident 14> Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of a recent heart attack, diabetes and cardiac disease. Resident 14's most recent comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a written notice of bed hold (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident was absent from the facility) at the time of a hospital transfer for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 14, 19 and 51) reviewed for hospital transfers. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed and any monetary charges associated with the bed hold while in the hospital. Findings included . Review of the policy titled Bed-Hold Policy dated 08/09/2023, showed the facility would provide the bed-hold policy to the resident upon admission, transfer to a hospital, or if the resident goes on therapeutic leave. <Resident 14> Review of the medical record showed Resident 14 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cardiac disease, diabetes and depression. The Resident's comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident 14 required substantial assistance of one to two staff members for all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to review and validate the Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews ([PASARR], an assessment to ensure individuals with serious mental illness [SMI] or intellectual/developmental disabilities [ID/DD] are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) were correct on admission and corrected/updated as needed for 3 of 5 residents (Resident 19, 30 and 46) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for not receiving the care and services appropriate for their needs. Findings included . Review of the facility policy dated 09/25/2023, titled Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) showed the facilities procedure was to ensure PASARR Level I screening had been completed on potential admissions prior to admission. <Resident 19> Review of Residents 19's medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include depression (a mood disorder that causes a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assist ensure an effective, resident-centered discharge plan was in place for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 46), reviewed for discharge planning. The failure to initiate a discharge plan consistent with the resident's needs and/or the resident representative's expressed discharge goals, placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, decreased self-worth, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Transfers and Discharges dated 06/28/2024 showed, the facility may initiate transfer or discharge of a resident, the documentation that must be included in the medical record, and who was responsible for making the documentation. Additionally, the facility would ensure the information that must be conveyed to the receiving provider for residents being transferred or discharged to another healthcare setting was provided. <Resident 46> Review of Resident 46's medical record showed the resident was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received medications or supplements that were physician prescribed and monitored as ordered for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 21) reviewed for insulin. This failed practice had the potential to cause the resident to experience adverse side effects and ineffective medication needs. Findings included . <Resident 21> Review of the resident's medical record showed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes (a disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time) and morbid obesity. The 04/12/2024 comprehensive assessment showed the resident's cognition was intact and required one to two staff assistance for activities of daily living. A concurrent observation and interview on 07/08/2024 at 11:42 AM, Staff L, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was checking Resident 21's blood sugar levels prior to lunch being served. Staff L stated to Resident 21 that their blood sugar had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide outside vision services for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 52), reviewed for experienced changes to their vision. This failed practice put the resident at risk for unmet vision needs and the ability to maintain their independence. Findings included . <Resident 52> Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes (a disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time) and heart failure. The 05/06/2024 comprehensive assessment showed the resident's cognition was intact and required substantial to maximum staff assistance for bed mobility and was independent on staff for their transfers. The assessment further showed the resident wore glasses. During an interview on 07/09/2024 at 1:11 PM, Resident 52 stated they had experienced seeing double vision for the past month or longer and reported it to a nurse manager. The resident stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to complete skin assessments or obtain treatment orders to manage pressure ulcers to prevent the development and/or worsening of pressure ulcers for 1 of 1 (Resident 52) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure placed the resident at risk for developing and/or worsening of pressure ulcers and increased pain. Findings included . Review of the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel's (NPIAP, the leading expert in PIs/wounds) guidelines and definitions, dated September 2016, defined pressure injury stages as follows: • Stage 1 PI has intact skin with a localized area of non-blanchable erythema (redness). • Stage 2 PI is a partial thickness skin loss with exposed dermis (the top inner layers of skin). • Stage 3 PI is a full thickness loss of skin, in which adipose (fat) tissue is visible in the ulcer. Slough (dead tissue) and or eschar (dried blood and tissue) may be visible, granulation tissue and epibole (rolled or curled under edges) may…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic (medications capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) medications for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 30) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications had a gradual dose reduction (GDR, is the stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued) to determine continued need and use of a medication, nor were person-centered behaviors being monitored to reflect adequate need of the medication. These failures placed the resident at an increased risk for receiving medications they no longer needed and/or increased behaviors due to inadequate dosing of medication. Findings included . <Resident 30> Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include bi-polar (serious…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were destroyed in 1 of 1 medication room (Team 1 med room) and 1 of 2 medication carts (Team 2 med cart). These failures placed residents at risk for receiving expired medications and negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Team 1 Med Room> A concurrent observation and interview of the Team 1 medication room on 07/11/2024 at 11:00 AM with Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse Unit/Coordinator showed the following expired medications and medical supplies: • A bottle of Megestrol Acetate (an oral medication used to stimulate the appetite) with an expiration date of 04/01/2024. • A Wixela inhaler (a medication used to control and prevent wheezing and shortness of breath caused by lung disease such as asthma and chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) with an expiration date of 12/01/2024. • A Spiriva Respimat inhaler (a medication used for maintenance treatment of long-term lung disease such as asthma and COPD) with an expiration date of 01/23/2024. • A Fluticasone-Salmeterol inhaler…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled and dated, expired foods were removed, and proper temperatures were consistently monitored for 2 of 2 snack/nourishment refrigerators (Teams 1 and 2) reviewed for infection control. This failed practice placed residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings included . Review of the policy titled .Sanitation and Food safety dated 05/01/2024, showed a temperature monitoring log will be maintained, and a designated staff member will document refrigerator temperatures daily. The facility staff will check individual food items for expiration dates and discard outdated food. All food will be labeled and dated to monitor for food safety. All food items should be consumed or discarded after three days. All food items unmarked or unlabeled containers should be labeled with contents, and the date the food item was stored. Any food suspected to be contaminated or with visible signs of contamination should be discarded immediately. During an interview on 07/12/2024 at 9:14 AM, Staff JJ,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative (RR) of significant changes in condition resulting in hospitalization for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for notification. The failure to notify the RR placed the resident at risk of not having them involved in the health care decision making process for timely care and services. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart disease and diabetes. Review of Resident 1's comprehensive assessment, dated 06/03/2024, showed the resident had no cognitive impairments. Review of a Nursing Progress Note (NPN) documented by Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN), dated 05/29/2024 at 6:22 AM, showed Resident 1 was complaining of nausea and shortness of breath. The resident requested to be sent to the hospital. Emergency services was called at 5:45 AM on 05/29/2024 to transport the resident to the emergency room (ER).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to notify the resident's responsible party of significant changes in condition in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for notification of changes. The failure to notify the responsible party placed the resident at risk of not having them involved in the health care decision making process for timely care and services. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility from the hospital with diagnoses which included fractures of both arms and dementia. Review of Resident 1's comprehensive assessment, dated 03/22/2024, showed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident 1's plan of care, dated 03/12/2024, showed the resident required one to two staff for assistance with activities of daily living. Review of Progress Notes (PNs), dated 04/02/2024 at 11:53 PM, showed Resident 1 had a fall on the day shift and sustained a skin tear. Documentation showed there were no further concerns at that time. Seven days later on 04/09/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a completed State Reporting Log (documentation used by facilities to report incidents of possible abuse, neglect, abandonment, mistreatment, injuries of unknown source, exploitation, major disasters/outbreaks, unexpected death/suicide, evacuation, or misappropriation of resident property in nursing homes) available to State Investigators upon their request. The failure to provide a completed State Reporting Log placed all residents at risk of unidentified abuse and neglect. Findings included . Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, sixth edition, dated October 2015, showed the facility must maintain a state Reporting Log and always readily accessible to the state licensing and certification staff, and others according to their authority. The Reporting Log at a minimum must contain the information and codes provided from The Purple Book. During an interview on 04/16/2024 at 8:45 AM, Staff A, Administrator, stated the facility did not have a complete Reporting Log to provide to the State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was adequately assessed/monitored after an unwitnessed fall which resulted in a lack of timely diagnosis for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for significant changes in condition. Failure to assess/monitor Resident 1 following a fall placed them at risk for delay in treatment. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Alert Charting Guidelines, undated, showed residents who have sustained falls were to be placed on alert charting by staff every shift for 72 hours. <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility from the hospital with diagnoses which included fractures of both arms and dementia. Review of Resident 1's comprehensive assessment, dated 03/22/2024, showed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident 1's plan of care, dated 03/12/2024, showed the resident required one to two staff for assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the facility investigation report, dated 04/02/2024 at 3:30 PM, showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure staff responsible for providing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR - an emergency procedure consisting of chest compressions combined with giving breaths of air) had current CPR certification for 4 of 16 licensed nursing staff (Staff A, B, C, D) reviewed for CPR certification status. This failure had the potential risk of the facility having a lack of staff who were properly trained in CPR readily available to respond in an emergency. Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy titled, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Policy, reviewed on [DATE], showed the facility should ensure that properly trained personnel and certified in CPR for Healthcare Providers are available immediately 24 hours per day to provide basic life support (level of medical care which is used for victims of life-threatening illnesses or injuries until they can be given full medical care at a hospital), including CPR to residents requiring emergency care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was used and resident testing for COVID-19 (infectious disease by a new virus causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise, headache, or new dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases difficulty breathing that could result in severe impairment or death) was performed in accordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines by 2 of 5 staff (Staff A, G) observed for infection control practices. This failure placed residents and staff at risk for contracting COVID-19. Findings included . <PPE> Review of the Washington State Department of Health COVID-19 guidelines, dated June 2023, showed staff need to wear full PPE (gown, gloves, N-95 respirator mask and eye protection) upon entering COVID-19 resident rooms for one resident encounter, then PPE was to be discarded. Staff don (put on) new PPE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccines (a vaccine that protects against pneumococcal infections that can lead to serious infections such as pneumonia and blood infections) were offered to 3 of 5 residents (Resident 3, 4, 5) reviewed for immunizations and infection control. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for illness, spread of a communicable disease and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Area of Focus: Resident Vaccines, reviewed on 12/01/2022, showed for Influenza and Pneumococcal immunizations: 1) Before offering the vaccine, each resident or the resident's representative receives education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccine. 2) Each resident is offered an influenza/pneumococcal immunization, unless the immunization is medically contraindicated, or the resident has already been immunized during this time period. Influenza immunizations are offered annually…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) with diabetic ulcers (open wound that can occur in residents with diabetes) a) to obtain treatment orders and perform timely, accurate, and thorough assessments; and b) failed to evaluate and monitor regarding a change of condition for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for assessments. These failures placed Resident 1 at risk for medical complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Treatment Orders, reviewed 03/31/2023, showed treatment orders were written per physician's orders. Following observation/evaluation of the affected skin area, the physician is notified. Review of the facility's policy titled, Documentation & Assessment of Wounds, reviewed on 03/31/2023, showed a wound assessment/documentation is required to occur at a minimum of weekly. If a resident refuses staff would obtain wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 kitchen was maintained in a sanitary and organized manner in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The kitchen was in a state of disrepair; surfaces lacked deep cleaning, and bulk foods were not labeled. This failure placed all residents, staff, and visitors that ate food from the kitchen at risk for food borne illnesses and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Sanitation and Maintenance policy, dated 04/26/2023, showed The Director of Food and Nutrition Services is responsible for ensuring that the department is maintained according to the standards of sanitation and in compliance with federal, state and local requirements . There is a facility process that includes reporting and follow up for all maintenance issues . Physical facilities are cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean. Cleaning is done during periods when the least amount of food is exposed. Review of the 12/19/2022 facility policy titled, Work Request System showed The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system of records for accurate accounting, reconciliation, and destruction of controlled substance medications (a group of medications that have the potential for abuse and/or physical or psychological dependence) for 2 of 3 medication carts (Halls 100 and 200) and 2 of 3 controlled substance logbooks (Halls 100 and 200), reviewed for medication storage. Failure to accurately verify the inventory of controlled medications through change of shift reconciliation and assure appropriate destruction procedures were maintained, placed residents at risk of financial loss, inadequate pain management, and the potential for drug diversion (the abuse of prescription drugs used for purposes other than intended by the prescriber). Review of the 04/10/2020 facility policy titled, Controlled Substance Destruction Process, showed that the facility would destroy Schedule II-V (categories of controlled substance medications based on the drugs abuse or dependency potential) in the presence of a Registered Nurse (RN),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that reflected the physical needs and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 17) reviewed for choices. The facility failed to ensure that the resident's living environment was conducive to their physical limitations, which placed the resident at risk for an increased dependence on staff and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 17. Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke (an interruption of blood flow to the brain), diabetes (a condition where the body does not use insulin properly), and kidney disease (kidneys cannot filter blood the way they should). The 04/17/2023 comprehensive assessment showed the resident required extensive assistance of one to two staff members for activities of daily living (ADLs). The assessment showed Resident 17 used an electric wheelchair for locomotion and had an intact cognition. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure written transfers/discharge notices were provided to residents and/or their representatives, and to the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 18 and 3), reviewed for facility initiated hospital transfers. These failures disallowed the residents and/or their representatives and the Long Term Care Ombudsman the opportunity to have the knowledge of where and why the resident was transferred, and/or how to appeal the transfer if desired. Findings included . Review of the 08/16/2022 facility policy, Notices of Transfers and Discharges, showed, .the facility will provide notice to the resident and/or resident representative in situations where the facility initiates a transfer or discharge, including discharges that occur while the resident remains in the hospital after emergency transfer .Before a facility transfers or discharges a resident, the facility must - (i). Notify the resident and the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or their representative of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of hospital transfer for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 18, 3, and 23) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure disallowed the residents and/or their representative's access to the information needed to safeguard their return to the facility. Findings included . Review of the revised 11/17/2022 facility policy titled, Bed-Hold Policy, showed The facility will provide written information to the resident or resident representative, the nursing facility policy on bed-hold periods and the resident return to the facility to ensure that residents are made aware of a facility's bed-hold and reserve bed payment policy before an upon transfer to a hospital or when taking a therapeutic leave of absence from the facility. Additionally, the policy showed that a second notice must be provided to the resident and/or their representative at the time of transfer, or in cases…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services to 1 of 3 residents (Resident 31) reviewed for restorative nursing and range of motion (ROM). Restorative nursing services were not provided for eight weeks starting in April 2023. This failure placed the residents at risk for pain, muscle contractures (shortening or hardening of muscles and tendons and stiffening of joints), and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the 09/19/2022 facility policy titled, Restorative Nursing, showed that the purpose was to promote the resident's highest level of functioning. The policy further showed that the restorative program could be initiated by nursing and/or therapy staff, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment. Nursing Assistants (NAs) must be trained in techniques that promoted resident involvement in the restorative activities. Additionally, the policy showed the facility must provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 residents (Residents 3 and 8) reviewed for accident hazards, received adequate supervision and appropriate use of assistive devices to prevent accidents. Resident 3 rolled out of bed onto the floor while receiving peri-care (cleansing of a resident's private areas) from Staff Q, Nursing Assistant (NA). Resident 8 reportedly was transferred with a Hoyer (mechanical lift) lift by one staff member instead of the required two staff members as directed by the facility policy and the resident's care plan. These failures placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the 09/29/2022 facility policy titled Fall Management Policy, showed that the facility would assess the resident upon admission/readmission, quarterly, with a change in condition, and with any fall event, for any fall risks and would identify appropriate interventions to minimize the risk of injury…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an assessment was performed before and after receiving dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) services for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 20 and 18), reviewed for dialysis. These failures placed the residents at risk for unnoticed change in medical condition, delay in treatment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the 08/18/2022 facility policy titled Dialysis Policy and Procedures, showed that the resident receiving dialysis would receive consistent care before (pre) and after (post) dialysis. The vascular (blood vessels) access site would be checked daily with physician notification for any known or suspected problem. Additionally, the Pre/Post Dialysis Communication Form would be sent with the resident to the dialysis center. Post dialysis instructions included obtaining a set of vital signs (measurements of the body's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$109,736 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $58,126 — penalty dated 2025-07-23
- $51,610 — penalty dated 2023-09-13
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BUTNER, NANCY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/16/2018 |
| KRAMER, EMILY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/31/2024 |
| TRINNAMAN, MATTHEW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/17/2024 |
| CROSS, CINDY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2006 |
| HENRY, TERRY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2006 |
| THURMOND, JOAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2006 |
| LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2005 |
| FLETCHER, TODD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/01/2021 |
| LAY, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/24/2017 |
| PRESTON, AUBREY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/06/2025 |
| SWANKER, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2022 |
| WATSON, BROOKS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/10/2025 |
| ZIEGLER, JAMES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2006 |
| PRESTON, FORREST | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/07/2004 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $490K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505070. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.