Alderwood Manor
3600 East Hartson Avenue, Spokane, WA 99202 · For profit - Partnership · 85 certified beds · (509) 535-2071 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.4% | 14.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.6% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 19.5% | 17.7% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 2.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.7% | 17.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.1% | 12.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.6% | 93.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.9% | 22.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.0% | 15.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.3% | 82.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.0% | 19.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.2% | 13.4% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 93.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.1%CMS range 41.3–63.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.2–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 93.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 93.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 75.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 4.0–10.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 63.7 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.17 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.54 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.36 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
59 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for accidents, was transferredas directed by the careplan. Resident 1 experienced harm when they were found to have a fractured arm and clavicle the next shift after being assisted to the floor when the wrong transfer method was used. This failure placed the residents at risk for falls and serious injury. Findings included . Review of the facility assessment, dated 05/02/2024, showed Resident 1 had diagnoses to include a stroke which affected their right side, and had difficulty with speech. The resident was alert and oriented. Resident 1 required substantial/maximal assist with transfers. The residents care plan, dated 12/09/2019 and revision date 07/05/2024, showed the resident required two staff to stand and pivot the resident with a gait belt, and/or use a sit to stand lift (designed to assist patients who have some mobility but need help to rise from a sitting position). In an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to recognize pressure ulcers (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin), accurately and thoroughly assess skin integrity: which potentially delayed the initiation and treatment and thoroughly document or measure wounds for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 202), reviewed for pressure ulcers. These failures resulted in actual harm to Resident 202, who developed additional pressure ulcers to the right medial ankle, left heel and great toe after being admitted to the facility, and placed other residents at risk for untreated skin issues, pressure ulcers, and a decreased quality of life Findings included . Review of the 03/31/2023 facility policy titled Skin Integrity and Pressure Ulcer/Injury Prevention and Management, showed staff should complete a comprehensive skin evaluation of the patient upon admission/re-admission to the facility, and then weekly thereafter. Skin observations were also to occur when providing care by the nursing assistants (NAs). Per the policy, any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who experienced multiple accidents that resulted in injury was evaluated for the need for increased supervision, and resident-specific fall preventative measures were added timely to care plans for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 31, 11), reviewed for falls. Resident 31 experienced harm when they had multiple falls resulting in a fractured arm, abrasions to the chin and elbow, and a fractured hip, and this failure placed other residents at risk for falls with injury. Findings included . <Resident 31> According to the 05/04/2023 admission assessment, Resident 31 had severely impaired cognitive skills and required assistance of one to two people with most activities of daily living (ADLs), including transfers and toileting. Per the assessment, the resident had some weakness and instability that put them at risk for falls, as well as a history of recent falls. A care plan related to the resident's fall risk was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed when indicated for 2 of 4 staff (Staff members W and R) observed during medication administration and failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact care activities for residents infected or colonized with multi-drug-resistant organisms, or those with chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices) were implemented when indicated for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 61 and 48) reviewed. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure interventions were developed and completed to prevent the growth of waterborne bacteria or Legionella (a contagious bacteria that caused respiratory illness when water droplets or mist containing the bacteria were inhaled) as part of the Water Management Plan as required. These failures placed all residents and staff at risk of spreading multi-drug-resistant organisms, cross-contamination, or risk of developing severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor a resident for latent injuries after numerous falls for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 10), reviewed for accidents/falls. Specifically, the facility did not complete vital signs (VS- temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate and blood pressure) and neurological checks (neuro checks, an assessment used to evaluate the residents' level of consciousness, movement, hand grasps, pupil size and reaction) after unwitnessed falls, nor consistently monitored the residents' condition after each fall. This failed practice placed residents at risk for unidentified injuries and diminished quality of life.Findings included .A review of the facility policy titled, Fall Management reviewed September 2025, showed how to identify fall risk and monitor resident indicators of falls. The document did not include the process of what staff were to do after a resident fell. A review of the facility document titled Neurological Checks on 02/10/2026 showed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were given as ordered on days the residents were out of the facility for dialysis treatments (a mechanical way of eliminating waste from the body when the kidneys no longer functioned) for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 4, 5 and 48) reviewed for dialysis care. Additionally, fluid restrictions (when oral fluid intake was limited to a specific amount daily by the provider to help maintain fluid balance for those that required dialysis) for Residents 5 and 48 were not documented or monitored for accuracy as ordered. This failure placed the residents at risk for unintended health consequences and decreased quality of life. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Hemodialysis Offsite Policy dated September 2024, showed the facility was to assure each resident received care and services for the provision of offsite dialysis to include arrangements for safe transportation, ongoing assessments of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were disposed of timely, in accordance with currently accepted professional standards, in 1 of 2 medication storage rooms. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain appropriate temperatures in 2 of 2 medication rooms to ensure medications were properly stored. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medication.Findings included .The United States Pharmacopeia retrieved from http: www.USP.org documented medications were to be stored at controlled room temperatures of 20 degrees Celsius (C) to 25 C (68 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 77 F), with excursions permitted between 15 C and 30 C (between 59 F and 86 F) and brief exposure to temperatures up to 40 C (104 F) may be tolerated provided the mean temperature did not exceed 25 C (77 F); however, such exposure was to be minimized. During an observation of the [NAME] Medication room on 02/06/2026 at 12:35 PM, with Staff AA, Licensed Practical Nurse, there was a fan blowing and the temperature of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow food code regulations that prevent the potential of foodborne illness. Specifically, the kitchen was not maintained in a clean manner, dietary staff did not perform hand hygiene when indicated during food services and 2 of 2 nourishment refrigerators were not consistently monitored for appropriate temperatures and contained unlabeled and expired food. These failures placed residents at risk for foodborne illness.Findings included. A review of the facility policy Food from Outside Sources revised July 2025 documented foods stored in designated refrigerators were to be labeled with the resident name and room number and discarded if past the expiration date. Additionally, the refrigerator temperature was not to exceed 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the freezer temperature was not to exceed 0 degrees F.<Kitchen Cleanliness>On 02/05/2026 at 8:48 AM, the kitchen floor was observed to be grimy and dingy with crumbs and food debris. There were also crumbs and food debris on the counter containing the toaster.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide education regarding the risks versus benefits and offer the COVID (a highly contagious viral illness that caused fever, breathing difficulty and potential hospitalization) vaccine if desired to 4 of 7 sampled staff (Staff F, I, J, and K) and 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 63), reviewed for immunizations. This failure placed staff and residents at risk of exposure to and illness from COVID-19.Findings included .According to The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website www.cdc.org Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule 2026 for ages 19 years or older adults age [AGE]-64 years, or adults age [AGE] or older who were unvaccinated for COVID-19, were recommended to receive 1 or 2 doses (dependent on the vaccine brand) of COVID-19 vaccine unless contraindicated. Those previously vaccinated before 2024-2025 were recommended to receive 1 or 2 doses (dependent on the vaccine brand) of 2025-2026 COVID-19 vaccine unless contraindicated.<Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain urinary catheters (a tube inserted in the bladder that drained urine into an external collection bag)in a dignified manner for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 8 and 65) reviewed for dignity. This failure put the residents at risk for loss of dignity and decreased quality of life. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Indwelling Urinary Catheter Management reviewed on 09/04/2025, instructed staff to keep the catheter bag off the floor. The policy did not address concerns regarding a resident's dignity when catheters were required. <Resident 8>The 01/13/2026 admission assessment documented Resident 8 had diagnoses that included cancer, respiratory failure and obstructive uropathy (a blockage that made it difficult to urinate). The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter, was dependent on staff for toileting and had severe cognitive impairments. In an observation on 02/05/2026 at 11:31 AM, Resident 8 was lying in bed. Their urine collection bag was seen from the doorway and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to exercise reasonable care for the protection of residents' property from loss or theft for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 17), reviewed for personal property. This failure placed residents at risk of loss or theft of property and did not create a homelike environment.Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Inventory of Personal Effects dated August 2025, showed the facility would protect residents' personal property and prevent loss. Items brought into the facility would be documented on an inventory of personal effects form upon admission. The form was to be updated if/when additional items were brought into the facility. Upon discharge, the resident and/or responsible party was to verify and sign that personal property was received. According to the 01/23/2026 admission assessment, Resident 17 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cancer. The assessment further showed it was very important for Resident 17…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 8 and 73), reviewed for admission baseline care planning. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving needed care, potentially avoidable accidents, and diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Baseline Care Plan dated August 2025, showed a baseline care plan would be developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission to provide an initial set of instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care. The baseline care plan was to be updated as needed to reflect current needs until the comprehensive care plan was developed. The baseline care plan was to be reviewed with the resident and/or representative and a copy provided.<Resident 8> The 01/13/2026 admission assessment, documented Resident 8 admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain respiratory care equipment in a sanitary manner for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 8 and 12), reviewed for respiratory care. This failure placed the residents at risk for respiratory infections and decreased quality of life.Findings included .<Resident 8> The 01/13/2026 admission assessment documented Resident 8 had diagnoses that included cancer, pneumonia and respiratory failure. The assessment further showed the resident required continuous oxygen. In an observation on 02/05/2026 at 11:31 AM, Resident 8's oxygen concentrator filter was covered in thick dust debris. A provider order dated 12/31/2025 instructed nursing staff to clean the oxygen concentrator filter with soap and water and to let it air dry weekly on Sundays. The 01/15/2026 care plan instructed staff to administer oxygen therapy as ordered. Subsequent observations of Resident 8's oxygen concentrator filter covered in thick dust debris were made on 02/06/2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 46 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist's recommendation for a resident's inhaler (a medication that helped ease the effort of breathing) was addressed timely for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 11) reviewed for monthly medication regimen reviews. This failure placed the resident at risk for unintended side effects of the medication, and decreased quality of life. Findings included .The 12/08/2025 annual assessment documented Resident 11 had diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, a group of lung diseases that caused inflammation and difficulty breathing). Review of Resident 11's record showed a physician order dated 11/12/2025 for Arnuity Ellipta (an inhaled medication for asthma, a chronic disease of the lungs that caused episodes of wheezing, coughing, chest tightness, and shortness of breath) to be given once daily beginning on 11/13/2025.A pharmacy consultation report dated 12/17/2025 recommended the Arnuity Ellipta order be updated to include rinsing the mouth with water after use to prevent thrush (a painful…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a total medication error rate of five percent or less for 3 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 76, 42, and 8) observed during medication administration. Specifically, 3 of 25 medications were observed to be given incorrectly for an error rate of 12 percent. This failure placed residents at risk of medication errors, adverse side effects, and potential medical complications. Findings included.<Resident 42> The 02/04/2026 admission assessment documented Resident 42 had diagnoses that included cancer, heart failure and diabetes. The resident was cognitively intact and able to make their needs known. Review of the 01/22/2026 provider order instructed nursing staff to administer Preservision AREDS (medication used to slow the progression of vision loss) two tablets to Resident 42 daily. During an observation on 02/09/2026 at 8:12 AM, Staff Y, Registered Nurse (RN), administered a multivitamin with minerals instead of the Preservision AREDS to Resident 42. In an interview on 02/12/2026 at 10:46 AM, Staff B,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor a surgical wound for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for non-pressure wounds. This failure placed residents with surgical incisions at risk of potential worsening skin conditions and complications. Findings included .A facility document titled Documentation and Assessment of Wounds, revised 06/12/2025, showed the facility Policy was to guide nurses in the assessment of wounds to include pressure ulcer/injuries (damage to the skin and underlying tissue caused by unrelieved pressure that restricts blood flow), venous (open sore on the lower leg from impaired circulation), arterial (painful wounds caused by poor circulation), diabetic (sores, ulcers, or chronic conditions that develop in people with diabetes, often on the feet, due to poor circulation, nerve damage), and dehisced surgical wounds (surgical wound that split open or separate), and other wounds not otherwise specified. A wound observation was to be made with each dressing change. The provider would be notified of changes and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and hair coverings were worn and implemented during food service. This failure placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included . A 04/30/2024 facility policy titled Associate Conduct and Dress Code showed hair and beard coverings were used when cooking, preparing or assembling food, but not required when distributing foods to the residents at the dining tables or when assisting the residents to dine. An observation on 10/22/2024 at 8:08 AM showed Staff Z, a Dietary Aide, participated in the breakfast tray line. Staff Z had visible facial hair and no beard covering. An observation on 10/25/2024 from 11:30 AM to 11:53 AM showed Staff Y, a Cook, standing in front of the food prep counter. The kitchen staff were getting ready to start lunch tray line. Staff Y wore a pink bandana. About three inches of hair was observed flowing down Staff Y's forehead. The bandana failed to contain Staff Y's hair, with visible hair observed coming out of the bandana around the sides and the back of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medication consents were accurate and obtained prior to their administration (Residents 3, 13, 39) and failed to ensure a consent for treatment and admission were signed by someone able to make those decisions (Resident 27) for 4 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents or their representative at risk of not being fully informed of the potential risks and benefits of taking the medications and care being provided at the facility. Findings included . <Resident 3> Review of Resident 3's medical record showed the provider ordered the medication sertraline on 07/01/2024 for depression. Review of the October 2024 Medication Administration Record showed the staff administered the sertraline to Resident 3 at bedtime. Review of Resident 3's care plan showed the resident used sertraline related to depression. Review of a 07/02/2024 Medication Informed Consent showed Resident 3 and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) related to cleanliness and grooming for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 44, 37, 9, and 19) reviewed for ADLs. Facility failure to provide residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with shaving (Resident 37), nail care (Resident 9), and bathing (Resident 44 and 19), placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, embarrassment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 44> Review of a 10/17/2024 assessment showed Resident 44 admitted with medically complex conditions. This assessment showed the staff assessed the resident to be cognitively intact and dependent on the staff for bathing. In an interview on 10/22/2024 at 8:36 AM, Resident 44 stated, Bathing dwindled down to once a week. Resident 44 stated that they preferred a bed bath twice a week. Review of the electronic medical record under Tasks showed an instruction to the staff to provide bathing to Resident 44 twice a week on Mondays and Thursdays. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY AMMENDED ON 11/18/2024. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents identified at risk for elopement were accurately assessed and interventions implemented to prevent elopement for 4 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 7, 27, 25 and 254) reviewed for elopement. The facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 41) had adequate and prompt interventions and supervision to prevent falls. Also, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 24 and 41) reviewed for smoking were adequately supervised, to include safe keeping of smoking materials. These failures placed the residents at risk for injuries related to elopement, falls, and smoking. Findings included . <ELOPEMENT> <Resident 25> Review of a 09/25/2024 facility policy titled Unsafe Wandering and Elopement Prevention showed the facility would assess residents to determine their risk for elopement and implement interventions as appropriate to mitigate risks identified. The policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were disposed of timely, in accordance with currently accepted professional standards, in 2 of 2 medication carts, and needles and lab supplies were securely stored that were in a bistro. The facility failed to maintain temperatures to ensure medications were properly stored in 2 of 2 medication storage rooms. The facility further failed to ensure anti-anxiety medications were stored behind two locks as required and nursing staff were signing the narcotic logs verifying all medications were accounted for at shift change. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medication, placed the facility at risk for potential diversion or misappropriation of psychotropic medications and potential for needlestick injuries. Findings included . On 10/22/2024 at 10:34 AM, an observation was made of a room called The Bistro. The room contained a kitchenette and had multiple cabinets and drawers. The lower unlocked cabinet contained two bottles of red liquid that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate preferences for bedtime routine for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 44) reviewed for choices. This failure placed the resident at risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a 08/16/2022 facility policy titled Person Centered Planning, showed the facility would develop a person-centered care plan that addressed the goals, preferences, values, and practices of the resident. This policy showed it would include the resident's participation and reflect the resident's right to make informed choices. In an interview on 10/22/2024 at 8:36 AM, Resident 44 stated, I would prefer to be woken up at or before 6:00 AM to remove the bi pap [respiratory equipment] off as early as possible. Resident 44 stated their preferred bedtime hours was around 8:00 PM. Review of a 10/17/2024 quarterly assessment showed the staff identified it was very important for Resident 44 to choose their own bedtime. Review of a 04/15/2024 Activities Evaluation showed Resident 44's preferred wake up time in the morning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a secure place for residents to store their valuables for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 13) reviewed for personal property. This failure placed residents at risk for their property to be lost or stolen, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . The Life Care Centers of America Inventory of Personal Belongings policy revised 06/12/2024 documented on admission, a resident or their representative would bring in personal clothing and it was to be marked with the resident's name by the laundry department then returned to the resident after labeled or washed. This was done to ensure all of the resident's clothing was returned once it had been laundered. The policy did not describe how other belongings were to be secured or safeguarded. A review of the 08/20/2024 quarterly assessment documented Resident 13 had diagnoses including dementia and depression. Resident 13 was moderately impaired cognitively, and it was somewhat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their Abuse and Neglect Prohibition Policies and Procedures to include, not reporting allegations of abuse to the State Agency (SA) within the required timeframe and completing thorough investigations for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 25) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed the resident and other residents at risk for repeated abuse. Findings included . Review of an October 2022 facility policy titled Abuse - Prevention showed the facility prevented and prohibited all types of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This policy showed the facility would identify, assess, care plan for appropriate interventions, and monitor residents with needs and behaviors which might lead to conflict or neglect, to include verbally or physically aggressive behavior. Review of a 06/27/2024 facility policy titled Abuse - Reporting and Response- Suspicion of a Crime showed it instructed the staff to report immediately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman received written notification of a hospital transfer, for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 51), reviewed for hospitalization/discharge. This failure placed the resident at risk of not having access to additional advocacy services from the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Findings included . The 08/29/2024 discharge assessment documented Resident 51 was cognitively intact to make decisions regarding their care and had diagnoses which included anxiety and opioid dependence. Review of Resident 51's record showed a nursing progress note documented in the early morning hours of 08/29/2024, the resident was observed to be pulling their hair and experiencing severe jerking movements of their body. The resident was assessed, and per direction of the on-call provider, the resident was sent to the hospital for evaluation. Additional record review found no documentation that showed the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman had been notified of the resident's transfer to the hospital.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed-hold notice, a notice that informed the resident of their right to pay the facility to hold their room/bed while they are hospitalized , to the resident and/or their representative at the time of discharge, or within 24 hours of transfer to the hospital, for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 51), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident at risk for a lack of knowledge regarding the right to a bed-hold, while they were hospitalized . Findings included The 08/29/2024 discharge assessment documented Resident 51 was cognitively intact to make decisions regarding their care and had diagnoses which included anxiety and opioid dependence. Review of Resident 51's record showed a nursing progress note documented in the early morning hours of 08/29/2024, the resident was observed to be pulling their hair and experiencing severe jerking movements of their body. The resident was assessed, and per direction of the on-call provider, the resident was sent to the hospital for evaluation. Additional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and incorporate specific recommendations made by the PASARR Level 2 evaluator for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 25) reviewed for pre admission screening. A PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level 2 Evaluation is a person-centered evaluation that is completed for anyone identified as having or suspected of having a serious mental illness, intellectual disability, developmental disability, or related condition. This failure placed Resident 25 at risk for unmet mental health care needs. Findings included . Review of a 10/11/2024 assessment showed Resident 25 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex conditions and assessed as cognitively intact. The assessment showed the diagnoses of depression and bipolar disorder. Bipolar disorder is a mental illness that causes extreme mood swings, along with changes in energy, sleep, thinking, and behavior. These shifts can make it difficult to do daily tasks and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a PASARR Level 1 [preadmission screening for individuals with a mental disorder and/or intellectual disabilities] was completed as required for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 3 and 27) reviewed for pre admission screening. This failure placed the residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health care needs. Findings included . <Resident 3> Review of a 10/25/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 3 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with medically complex conditions, to include depression and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident 3's diagnoses list also included somatization disorder (when a person has a significant focus on physical symptoms, such as pain, weakness or shortness of breath, to a level that results in major distress and/or problems functioning). Review of the medical record showed no presence of a PASARR Level 1. The above findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provider was notified when a resident had possible seizure activity for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 37) reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk of not being assessed for possible decline by their provider, unintended health consequences, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . A review of the annual assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident 37 had diagnoses including dementia, and paralysis on one side of their body from a stroke. The resident was severely cognitively impaired and had not had a previous diagnosis of having seizures. A nursing progress note dated 10/19/2024 at 3:16 PM documented Resident 37 was in the dining room with their family when the resident had what looked like an absence seizure, (a short period of staring blankly in to space). The resident's hand and foot were having seizure like movements for about 10 minutes. The resident was aware and speaking during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and monitor a pressure ulcer for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 24) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure put the resident at risk for worsening breakdown of their skin, infection, and unintended health consequences. Findings included . A review of the 08/19/2024 admission assessment documented Resident 24 had diagnoses including paralysis of one upper extremity following a stroke and left fractured femur (thigh bone). Resident 24 was cognitively intact and was at risk for development of pressure ulcers but had none when admitted . On 09/16/2024, a significant change assessment was completed that documented Resident 24 rejected care and had one unstageable (the ulcer was covered by a layer of dead tissue that may have been green, brown, or black and made it unable to determine the extent of the wound underneath) pressure ulcer not present on admission. The 08/23/2024 care plan documented Resident 24 was at risk for break in skin integrity related to decreased mobility. Staff were to provide a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate orthotic devices (devices to help support muscles, tendons and ligaments in the wrist and hands) were implemented and monitored to prevent contractures for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 10) reviewed for Position/Mobility. This failure placed the resident at risk for deterioration in Range of Motion (ROM) abilities and development of contractures. Findings included . On 10/22/2024 at 12:03 PM, Resident 10 stated that they participated in a Restorative Nursing Program for, arms and legs, hands and feet. On 10/23/2024 at 9:31 AM, Resident 10 was observed sitting in their wheelchair, with their legs propped on a pillow, and a rolled washcloth to each hand grip. On 10/24/2024 at 2:21 PM, Resident 10 was observed with a rolled washcloth to each hand grip and they stated, They gave me a splint for both hands. But it hurt my hands so now I have washcloths. The observation showed the washcloth to the right hand grip was out of Resident 10's hand. Resident 10 stated that they had the rolled washcloths…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident 18)reviewed for incontinence, received the care and services necessary to maintain and avoid loss of bowel and bladder functions. This failure placed the resident at risk for continued decline in bowel and bladder function, skin issues, and feelings of frustration and embarrassment. Findings included . Review of a 10/15/2024 quarterly assessment showed Resident 18 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This assessment showed the resident admitted to the facility with a stroke and assessed to have moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment showed the resident required substantial/maximal assistance to transfer to the toilet, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, and no toileting program in place to manage the resident's incontinence. An observation on 10/22/2024 at 9:40 AM showed Resident 18 in bed. When asked if they required assistance to use the bathroom for bowel and bladder elimination,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen delivery equipment was maintained in a clean manner for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 19 and 38) reviewed for respiratory care. These failures placed the residents at risk for respiratory complications and infection. Findings included . <Resident 19> Per the 10/01/2024 admission assessment, Resident 19 had diagnoses which included heart failure and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA, when you can't breathe while asleep because of a blockage of your windpipe) and needed a CPAP (a machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open) due to those conditions. The 09/27/2024 physician order instructed nursing staff to cleanse the CPAP mask with warm soapy water, rinse and air dry daily and as needed. The 02/28/2024 care plan documented Resident 19 used a CPAP for OSA. In an observation and interview on 10/22/2024 at 2:19 PM, Resident 19's CPAP was unclean with white splatter inside of the mask. Resident 19 stated staff had not cleaned their mask, and they cleaned it twice weekly by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis care was provided consistently with professional standards for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 13 and 19) reviewed. Specifically, Resident 13 was not consistently evaluated post-dialysis treatments, and Resident 19 was not given their morning medications on dialysis treatment days. This failure placed residents at risk for unintended health consequences, deterioration of their chronic diseases and decreased quality of life. Findings included . The Life Care Centers of America, Area of Focus: Dialysis policy revised 11/29/2023 documented on the day of dialysis, staff were to check medications the resident was taking and follow physician orders regarding medication administration and complete the Pre/Post Dialysis Communication form before and after treatment. Post-dialysis, staff were instructed to obtain vital signs, transcribe any orders received from the dialysis facility and maintain the communication form in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 3 and 25) reviewed for trauma informed care, received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The failure of the facility to adequately assess, identify potential triggers (a psychological stimulus that prompts recall of a previous traumatic event), and develop and implement a Trauma Informed Care Plan to help limit the residents' exposure to potential trauma triggers, placed the residents at risk for re-traumatization and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 3> Review of a 09/06/2024 facility policy titled Trauma-Informed Care showed that residents who have a history of trauma and or post-traumatic stress disorder will receive appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem. Trigger-specific interventions would identify ways to decrease the resident's exposure to triggers which re-traumatize the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure blood pressures and heart rates were monitored and medications were held when parameters required it for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 10 & 22) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for unintended health consequences and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 10> Review of Resident 10's September and October 2024 Medication Administration Records (MAR) showed an order that instructed the staff to administer metoprolol (a medication used to treat high blood pressure and heart failure) by mouth at bedtime. The order also instructed the staff to hold the metoprolol if the resident's pulse was less than 60 beats per minute. Review of the September and October 2024 MAR showed the staff administered the metoprolol at bedtime even though they assessed Resident 10's pulse was below 60 on 09/01/2024, 09/05/2024, 09/07/2024, 09/13/2024, 10/01/2024, 10/02/2024, 10/03/2024, 10/08/2024, 10/10/2024, 10/15/2024 and 10/29/2024. The above findings were shared with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a complete water management plan, to mitigate the facility's risk factors associated with Legionnaire's Disease (a serious condition, caused by exposure to water sources infected with the Legionella pathogen), failed to ensure soiled linens were transported properly, and failed to ensure oxygen was administered in a sanitary manner and equipment was clean and maintained for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 38) reviewed for respiratory care. These failures placed all residents at risk for exposure to Legionella, infections, respiratory complications, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Water Management Program> Review of the facility's water management plan showed it was last reviewed on 03/11/2024. Review of the plan showed it had not been fully developed and, aside from identifying the facility's water source, the facility's contacts, and the facility's characteristics, the rest of the program was either not fully completed or blank. On 10/30/2024 at 12:51 PM, Staff A,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure wheelchairs were maintained in a clean manner for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 14 and 19) reviewed for physical environment. This failure placed residents at risk for lack of dignity and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 14> Per the 10/16/2024 quarterly assessment, Resident 14 had diagnoses which included a stroke and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), had moderate cognitive impairments and required substantial to total assist for all cares. Review of the 01/25/2023 comprehensive care plan documented Resident 14 was wheelchair bound. During an observation on 10/22/2024 at 10:22 AM, Resident 14 was sitting in their wheelchair in their room. The left armrest of their wheelchair was covered with sheepskin and a netting was placed over it. The sheepskin and netting were unclean and had a brown and red substance on it. In an observation on 10/23/2024 at 8:14 AM, Resident 14 was sitting in the dining room. The sheepskin and netting were unclean with a red and brown substance on it.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances for 8 out of 9 residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9) related to not honoring residents food choices and not following resident meal cards (cards that show likes, dislikes, allergies, and fluids to be served). Failure to promptly resolve grievances resulted in on-going dietary complaints from residents and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident interviews> On 05/29/2024 at 1:00 PM, Resident 1 stated they attended the food committee monthly and residents had been told they don't fill out menus correctly and that was why they didn't get the food they ordered. Resident 1 stated they were served food they hadn't circled on the menu and was often served their dislikes. The resident stated kitchen management told the committee changes would be made and it didn't happen. On 05/29/2024 at 1:14 PM, Resident 8 stated the food wasn't good. The resident stated it didn't matter what was filled out on the menu, the kitchen didn't serve it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and/or neglect for 4 of 6 residents (Resident 4, 5, 6, and 7), reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. This failure placed residents at risk for further abuse and/or neglect and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 4> According to the facility assessment, dated 06/03/2024, Resident 4 had diagnoses to include heart disease. Resident 4 was able to make their needs known. On 06/12/2024 at 10:25 AM, Resident 4 was sitting in a wheel chair in their room. The resident was asked if they had any concerns with staff and replied not that they could recall. Resident 4 stated if they did, it was probably one of the agency people that worked weekends, because they didn't know the residents very well. Review of the facility grievance log showed Resident 4 had filed a nursing concern on 05/14/2024. Review of the grievance form, dated 05/14/2024, showed Resident 4 had a concern about Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), who was rough and rude to them. Under Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor and documented condition changes for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for change in condition. This failure placed residents at risk for worsening medical conditions and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of a facility assessment, dated 11/29/2023, showed Resident 1 had diagnoses which included heart and lung disease, difficulty swallowing, and dementia. Resident 1 had difficulty making their needs known and required extensive assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). Review of a facility document titled Alert Charting Guidelines showed residents with a change in condition were to be charted on every shift until the condition resolved, the resident was sent out, or the resident returned to their baseline (their medical condition prior to having a change). Review of a progress note by Staff A, Physician Assistant (PA), dated 01/10/2024, showed staff had asked Staff A to assess Resident 1 for a decline in their condition. Review of nursing progress notes from 01/09/2024 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure they staffed enough staff to provide care according to facility acuity (the level of severity of residents' illnesses, physical, mental, and cognitive limitations, and conditions) and/or care plans for 5 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3 ,4, and 5), reviewed for sufficient staffing. This failure placed residents at risk for potentially avoidable accidents, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, revised 08/2023 showed residents would receive assistance as needed to complete activities of daily living. The policy further showed the facility must ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and resident choices. Review of the facility assessment revised 10/17/2023 showed the facility had an average daily census of 47.9 residents and no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient preparation for a safe discharge for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for discharges. Resident 1 was discharged without adequate knowledge on using a glucometer (a machine that measures blood sugar levels) or injecting insulin (a medication that controls blood sugar). This failure placed the resident at risk for medical complications. Findings included . Review of the facility assessment, dated 08/10/2023, showed Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses which included Diabetes. Resident 1 was able to make their needs known. Per record review, the resident was admitted from the hospital on insulin. The resident was to continue to use insulin after discharge. Per interview on 09/18/2023 at 12:50 PM, Staff A, Resident Care Manager, stated if a resident was going home with new equipment or medication they should receive education/training prior to discharge. With Resident 1, the teaching wasn't done on the glucometer and insulin until the day of discharge. Teaching should have started weeks prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were available to meet the care needs for 4 of 17 sample residents (38, 22, 11, 31), reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLS), timely administration of medications, a clean and homelike environment, and supervision to prevent accidents. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <ADLS and Resident Interviews> In an interview on 06/22/2023 at 9:47 AM, Resident 22 stated there was not enough staff to ensure cares are provided. During an interview on 06/22/2023 at 10:12 AM, Resident 18 stated there were not enough staff to provide cares. Resident 18 added they would like more showers but there was not enough staff. In an interview on 06/22/23 10:25 AM, Resident 45 stated they did not get changed timely during the night shift because there was not enough staff at night. They said they usually needed to be changed twice during the night but sometimes it only happened once. On 06/23/23 at 9:48 AM, when asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-07 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Staff D, the Registered Dietician (RD) had proper qualifications. This failure placed residents at risk for nutritional mis-management and potential decline. Findings included . The 05/23/2023 Facility Assessment tool showed the facility residents required and were to be provided nutrition care that included individualized, liberal, or specialized diets, assistive devices, cultural or ethnic dietary needs, and fluid monitoring or restrictions. A dietician or other clinically qualified nutrition professional was to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. The 07/01/2016 Agreement for Dietary Consulting Services showed the Consultant certifies that the Consultant is licensed by and registered in the state in which the Facility is located and has all other approvals and certificates required by state and federal agencies in order to qualify for and participate in Medicaid and Medicare and other healthcare programs. The Consultant was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to label and date food products, and to discard of food products on or before the expiration date. This failure placed the residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included: <Food labeling and storage observation> Observation of facility kitchen dry food storage area on 6/22/2023 at 09:00AM showed expired food which included: 1 can of chili with an expiration date of 3/2023 6 cans of chili with an expiration date of 4/2023 15 packages of tortillas with and expiration date of 4/2023 2 cans of pork and beans with an expiration date of 3/2023 1 can of butterscotch pudding with and expiration date of 4/2023 3 cans of chow Mein noodles with and expiration date of 7/18/2022 5 bags of raisins with an expiration date of 1/2023 2 bags of marshmallows with an expiration date of 5/2023 Observation of facility kitchen pantry on 06/28/2023 at 5:33 AM, 4 expired food items, as well as 26 open food containers with no use by date and/or opened date were found. In an interview on 07/03/23 at 12:16 PM with Kitchen Staff Member Z, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program that provided a safe and sanitary environment. Failure to ensure hand hygiene was completed and gloves were changed between clean and dirty tasks while medications were given for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 4) reviewed for medication administration, and to ensure staff were informed and preventative measures were implemented to prevent the spread of bed bugs, prior to admitting a resident (Resident 153) placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Safe and Sanitary Environment> Observations showed the following: - On 06/22/2023 at 8:32 AM, a mobile cart was sitting in the corner of the conference room that had been provided to the survey team. On the second shelf of the cart, a box without a lid was full and contained used COVID-19 tests. In addition, a quarter full drink cup containing green liquid was sitting on the cart. Staff B, Director of Nursing, was present and when the survey team…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-07 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 41), reviewed for unnecessary medications, was informed of the potential risks associated with the use of psychotropic medications (medications that can affect the mind, emotions, and behaviors). This failure placed the resident at risk of not being fully informed of the potential risks and benefits of taking the medications. Findings included Per the 04/04/2023 admission assessment, Resident 41 was able to make decisions regarding care, and had diagnoses which included depression. In addition, the assessment showed the resident received psychotropic medication daily (defined above). A review of the Order Summary Report showed on 05/30/2023, the physician had prescribed a psychotropic medication (Venlafaxine) to treat depression. Review of the May and June 2023 Medication Administration Records (MARS) showed the medication was given daily as ordered. Review of Resident 41's record did not show documentation that the risks and benefits of the medication were discussed, either…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, homelike environment for 3 of 9 sampled residents (Residents 6, 14, and 202), reviewed for durable medical equipment, on 1 of 2 nursing units (east), that had large sections of wallpaper peeling off the walls, and in 1 of 2 nourishment kitchenettes (east) that was unclean and had unpleasant odors. These failures placed the residents at risk for a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Wheelchairs> The 06/09/2023 quarterly assessment showed Resident 6 had diagnoses including heart failure, required the assistance of one staff for mobility on the nursing unit, and used a wheelchair. The 05/15/2023 quarterly assessment showed Resident 14 had diagnoses including paralysis on one side of their body following a stroke, and required extensive assistance of one staff to transfer them from their bed to their wheelchair. The 06/16/2023 admission assessment showed Resident 202 had diagnoses including dementia and weakness, and was dependent on two staff to transfer them from their bed to their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure incidents of potential abuse, such as financial exploitation, were identified as such, and reported to the State Survey Agency as required, for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 3), reviewed for abuse. Failure to report allegations/incidents of abuse placed the resident at risk for additional abuse. Findings included . Review of the facility Abuse Prevention policy, last revised 10/04/2022, showed it was the policy of the facility to prevent, prohibit, identify, and thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents, along with misappropriation of resident property. The policy further showed, The facility will report alleged violations related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property and report the results of all investigations to the proper authorities within prescribed timeframes. The facility will ensure that all staff are aware of reporting requirements. Per the 05/10/2023 quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and thoroughly investigate an allegation of potential exploitation for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 3), reviewed for abuse. Failure to identify and investigate an allegation of potential exploitation for the resident placed them at risk for further exploitation. Findings included . Review of the facility Abuse Prevention policy, last revised 10/04/2022, showed it was the policy of the facility to prevent, prohibit, identify, and thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of resident property. Per the 05/10/2023 quarterly assessment, Resident 3 was cognitively intact to make decisions regarding care and had medically complex diagnoses which included depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (a disorder in which people have intense, disturbing thoughts and feelings related to their experience that last long after a traumatic event occurred). A review of the progress notes from 02/01/2023 thorough 07/04/2023 showed the following entries: - On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services according to professional standards for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 22) reviewed for medication administration, and for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 27, 43, 202), reviewed for oxygen therapy. Failure to consistently change resident 22's dressing for the PICC (a thin catheter inserted into a large vein to enable the administration of intravenous medications), and failure to change resident 27, 43, and 202's oxygen tubing and clean the filters for the oxygen equipment, placed the residents at risk for infection, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the article, Central Line Management, published by the National Library of Medicine on 05/26/2023, dressing changes for a central venous access line (such as a PICC) should occur every five to seven days with a transparent dressing or every two days if a gauze dressing was used, and the dressing needed to be changed sooner if it was no longer adherent, it's integrity was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dependent residents services to maintain their nutrition and personal hygiene for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 14 and 22), reviewed for activities of daily living ADLs for dependent residents. Resident 14 had difficulty manipulating their eating utensils and was not assisted or reassessed, and Resident 22 did not receive showers twice weekly as scheduled and requested. Findings included . <Resident 14> A review of the record showed Resident 14 had diagnoses included paralysis of one side of the body after a stroke, difficult swallowing, and a contracture (hardening of muscle and rigidity of a joint) of the right elbow and hand. A 05/15/2023 quarterly assessment showed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance of one staff for most ADLs, needed supervision and set-up help for eating, and did not cough or lose food or fluids from their mouth when eating. The 07/2019 Comprehensive Care Plan included the following care areas: -ADL self-care performance deficit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <Resident 202> Resident 202 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include chronic kidney disease, and a history of urogential implants (a device used to treat urinary incontinence). The 06/16/2023 admission assessment showed Resident 202 had a urinary catheter (a thin flexible tube placed in the bladder to drain urine). The assessment did not include a diagnosis that would medically justify the need for the urinary catheter. Per review of Resident 202's medical record, there was no documentation that showed the facility had attempted to remove the catheter and perform a voiding trial. The hospital record showed the urinary catheter had been placed during Resident 202's hospital stay. During an interview on 07/05/2023 at 11:16 AM Staff FF, Physician's Assistant, stated urogenital implants was not an appropriate diagnosis for a urinary catheter. Staff FF added when a resident admitted to the facility without a proper diagnosis, the catheter was discontinued and a voiding trial was started. Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dialysis services consistent with professional standards, and ensure consistent, ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 11, 27), reviewed for dialysis. In addition, the facility failed to process a medication order from the dialysis center timely for Resident 11, which resulted in a delay in the medication being administered. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and medical complications. Findings included . <Resident 11> The 05/30/2023 admission assessment showed Resident 11 was cognitively intact to make decisions regarding cares, had medically complex conditions, and diagnoses which included kidney disease, and diabetes (a disease caused by the inability of the body to convert the food we eat into sugar needed for the cells to use as energy). In addition, the assessment showed the resident received dialysis (a procedure that removes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to acquire and administer medications timely for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 8, 203), reviewed for pharmaceutical services. This failure resulted in a delay of medication administration, and potential for worsening medical conditions. Findings included . <Resident 8> Per the 04/17/2023 assessment, Resident 8 was admitted with diagnoses to include dementia and dysphagia (a swallowing disorder). Per a progress note on 04/03/2023 at 12:08, an outside provider phoned the facility with an order for Protonix (a medication that treats heartburn, ulcers, and acid reflux - a condition in which stomach acid goes into the esophagus), related to ulcers being found. Resident 8 was already receiving famotidine, a medication that treated the same conditions. A review of the physician orders and progress notes from 04/03/2023 through 05/04/2023 showed the medication was unavailable and not provided (due to a need for a prior authorization), the physician was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper monitoring of medication which affected blood pressure was consistently done for 1 of 5 sampled resident (Resident 3), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for potential adverse side effects and medical conditions. Findings included . Per the 05/10/2023 quarterly assessment, Resident 3 had diagnoses which included high blood pressure and atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm). Review of the Order Summary Report from 01/01/2023 through 06/30/2023 showed the physician ordered a blood pressure medication (Metoprolol) on 05/18/2023 to be given twice a day. The order instructed nursing staff to hold the medication if the heart rate was below 55 beats per minute or if the top number of the blood pressure (systolic) was under 110, to recheck the blood pressure in an hour, and to notify the doctor and document a nursing note in the resident's record. Review of the June 2023 Medication Administration Records (MARS) showed the AM dose of Metoprolol was held on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 205) reviewed for medication administration, was free from significant medication errors. Failure to completely process a medical provider's order for a narcotic pain medication caused increased sedation for Resident 205, and placed the resident at risk for medical complications, and unmet care needs. Findings included . Per the 06/16/2023 admission assessment, Resident 205 had moderate cognitive impairment, was able to make needs known, and had medically complex conditions which included anxiety, depression, and chronic pain. In addition, the assessment showed the resident had frequent pain and received a narcotic pain medication daily. A progress note on 07/04/2023 at 10:53 PM documented that a visiting family member informed the nurse that something was wrong with the resident. The resident was observed to be sweating profusely, weak, shaky, and intermittently responsive. Vital signs were within normal values, but the resident's respirations had become slower and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, the facility failed to ensure one of two medication rooms (east), had the narcotic box affixed that was placed in the refrigerator, as required. This failure placed unintended access by others to drugs because they were not locked up and/or unmovable. Findings included . In an observation on 06/26/2023 at 3:08 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing (DON), provided access to the medication room on the east unit to the surveyor. The refrigerator was locked, and the unlocked narcotic box, inside the refrigerator, which contained Marinol (a schedule III medication used to treat nausea and increase appetite), was not permanently affixed, as to prevent potential drug diversion. During an interview on 06/06/26 at 3:15 PM Staff B stated the narcotic box should have been locked, and was unaware it needed to be permanently affixed. Staff B added that the issue would be resolved. Reference WAC: 388-97-1300(2), 2340
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA — 194 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 193 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 193; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUND I INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 96% | since 08/23/1995 |
| ALEXANDER, KEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/09/2023 |
| BUTNER, NANCY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/16/2018 |
| SNOOOK, TERESA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/14/2024 |
| CROSS, CINDY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/21/1994 |
| FLETCHER, TODD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/02/2020 |
| HENRY, TERRY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/16/1999 |
| LAY, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/09/2018 |
| SWANKER, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2011 |
| THURMOND, JOAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/22/2000 |
| ZIEGLER, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/16/1999 |
| CONSOLIDATED RESOURCES HEALTH CARE FUND I LP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/1990 |
| HCF INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 08/23/1995 |
| LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/05/1990 |
| MORAN, JULIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/24/2025 |
| PRESTON, AUBREY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/06/2025 |
| CRHC LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| DEVELOPERS INVESTMENT COMPANY INC | Organization | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 08/23/1995 |
| PRESTON, FORREST | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/31/2000 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505257. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.