Sandridge Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 191 beds and averages 148.6 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility documentation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly stored and not left at the bedside for 1 of 1 residents sampled (Resident #160). The universe was 156. The deficient practice could result in residents and visitors having unrestricted access to medications. Findings include: Resident #160 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included metabolic encephalopathy, unspecified dementia, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of the care plan first initiated on March 18, 2026, revealed a focus for cognitive loss related to Alzheimer's disease or other dementias with interventions to explain all care before providing and to monitor for changes in cognitive status. Further review of the care plan revealed no evidence of Resident #160 being authorized or able to self-administer medications. Review of the modified admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #160 had a brief interview for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, review of clinical records, and review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that the medical record was complete and accurate for one resident (#10). This deficient practice could lead to inadequate investigation, monitoring, and follow up to ensure the resident's safety and well-being.Findings include: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease of the native coronary artery without angina pectoris, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, dysphagia, paraplegia, essential (primary) hypertension, hyperlipidemia, a personal history of recurrent pneumonia, a history of falling, and gastrostomy status.A review of the intake and five-day report provided by the facility revealed that on December 18, 2025, at approximately 10:30 AM, the Administrator (staff #88) was made aware by Nurse Manager…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of facility policies and review of SA database, the facility failed to ensure a through investigation was conducted for abuse and misappropriation of property for two residents (#29 and #33). The deficient practice could result in ongoing abuse of residents.Findings include: -Regarding resident #29Resident #29 was admitted [DATE], and discharged [DATE], with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; schizophrenia; bipolar disorder, unspecified; anxiety disorder, unspecified; major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified; and personal history of transient ischemic attack, and cerebral infarction, without residual deficits. Review of the care plan initiated on March 2, 2022 revealed a focus area for mood, resident is at risk for fluctuating mood symptoms related to sadness, depression, anxiety, fear caused by functional changes. Interventions include observe signs and symptoms for worsening sadness, depression, anxiety, fear, anger, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and a review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that three medication carts were secured in accordance with professional standards and facility policy when left unattended. The deficient practice could result in residents, visitors, and/or staff members having unrestricted access to medications and medical supplies.Findings include:An observation conducted on December 16, 2025, at 11:13 a.m., revealed that a medication cart on the Beta 2 unit was unattended and unlocked while outside of the direct line of sight of staff. The observation was evidenced by the State Agency (SA) being able to pull open three drawers holding resident medications, over-the-counter (OTC) medications, and diabetic supplies, including lancets.An observation conducted on December 16, 2025, at 11:21 a.m., revealed that the fill-in Director of Nursing and Licensed Practical Nurse Manager (LPN Manager/Staff#13) walked by the unlocked medication cart on the Beta 2 unit and locked it as she walked by. An interview was conducted on December 16, 2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that resident-identifiable information and records were kept confidential and not visible to the public. The deficient practice could result in the violation of residents' rights to privacy.Findings include:An observation conducted on December 16, 2025, at 11:27 a.m., revealed that an unattended medication cart on the Beta 1 unit had a laptop on top of it with resident records open on the screen. The nurse was observed in a resident room.An interview was conducted on December 16, 2025, at 11:28 a.m. with a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/Staff#202) who stated that it was not her process, or the facility's process, to leave her laptop open with resident records visible and unattended. The LPN stated that the risk of leaving the records open on her laptop was that it was a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) violation. An observation conducted on December 17, 2025, at 8:02 a.m., revealed that a medication cart on the Beta 2 unit was unattended and had a laptop on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident # 16) was free from abuse by another resident (# 22). The deficient practice could result in other residents being abused. Findings include: -Regarding Resident (# 22) Resident (# 22) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of major depressive disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, bipolar disorder, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 indicating severe cognitive impairment. It was also noted that the resident is rarely understood. A comprehensive care plan dated December 3, 2024, revealed that Resident (# 22) makes statements of auditory hallucination and delusions. Interventions include, maintaining calm with a slow, understandable approach, and staff to observe for signs and symptoms of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure six of six sampled residents (#2, #3, #4, #5, #6 and #8) were free from sexual or physical abuse from one resident #1. The deficient practice could lead to sexual, physical and psychosocial harm to the residents. Findings include: -Regarding residents #1 and #2: -Resident #1 was admitted to the facility December 21, 2021 with dysphagia following cerebral infarction, unspecified dementia, mild, with agitation, schizophrenia, unspecified. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 completed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed no indicators for mood, but will self-isolate. Indicators for physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others, verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others, other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others and wandering. These…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy, by failing to report an allegation of sexual abuse involving five residents (#2, # 3, #4, #5 and #6) to the State Agency. The deficient practice could result in continued resident to resident sexual abuse Findings include: -Regarding residents #1 and #2: -Resident #1 was admitted to the facility December 21, 2021 with dysphagia following cerebral infarction, unspecified dementia, mild, with agitation, schizophrenia, unspecified. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 completed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed no indicators for mood, but will self-isolate. Indicators for physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others, verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others, other behavioral symptoms not directed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of sexual abuse for five residents (#2, # 3, #4, #5 and #6) was reported to the State Agency. Findings include: -Regarding residents #1 and #2: -Resident #1 was admitted to the facility December 21, 2021 with dysphagia following cerebral infarction, unspecified dementia, mild, with agitation, schizophrenia, unspecified. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 completed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed no indicators for mood, but will self-isolate. Indicators for physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others, verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others, other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others and wandering. These assessments occurred 1-3 days of the lookback period. Review of the care plan,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, review of facility records, and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to have evidence that an alleged violation involving sexual abuse regarding five residents (#2, # 3, #4, #5 and #6) was thoroughly investigated. The deficient practice could result in additional alleged violations involving abuse not being investigated Findings include: -Regarding residents #1 and #2: -Resident #1 was admitted to the facility December 21, 2021 with dysphagia following cerebral infarction, unspecified dementia, mild, with agitation, schizophrenia, unspecified. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 completed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed no indicators for mood, but will self-isolate. Indicators for physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others, verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others, other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $203K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ