No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Oak River Rehab

3300 Franklin Street, Anderson, CA 96007 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 143 certified beds · (530) 365-0025 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (530) 365-0025 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (19) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3082 McMurry Dr · (530) 365-4412 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2940 East St · (530) 378-5566 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2199 North St · (530) 364-2135 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1600 Veterans Ln · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.5%10.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.6%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.0%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%1.6%3.3%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.6%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.7%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.7%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.5%10.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.2%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.5%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.4%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.0%11.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.892.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.981.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 700 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.31hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 282 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.2%CMS range 58.7–65.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 9.7–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 6.2–10.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.101.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
1.33
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.94
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.53
RN hoursweekends
40.3%
Total nursing turnover
15.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 143 beds and averages 132.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-05)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2022-03-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interviews and record review, the facility failed to meet this requirement when Resident 1 was administered nitroglycerin without a physician ' s order. This was against the facility ' s policy and had the potential to contribute to a decline in Resdident 1 ' s health. Findings Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, (an imbalance of chemicals in the blood that can cause confusion and tiredness), morbid (life-threatening) obesity, muscle weakness, congestive heart failure (inability of the heart to return blood flow to the body), history of stroke, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of the facility ' s policy titled Administering Medications, revised April 2019, indicated that physician orders are required for administering medications to residents:4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders . A review of the facility ' s policy titled Medication Orders, dated 11/2014, indicated that: 2. A current list…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, facility document, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents' Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I Screenings were accurate for 2 (Resident #76 and Resident #111) of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR requirements. This had the potential for residents not to receive care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs and adversely affect their psychosocial and emotional well-being. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), revised 10/2023, revealed, 1. All new admissions and readmission are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID), or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process. a. If the level I screen indicates that the individual may meet the criteria for a MD, ID, or RD, he or she is referred to the state PASARR representative for the Level II (evaluation and determination) screening process. 1. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication was ordered from the pharmacy within enough time to ensure routine doses were available for administration to 1 (Resident #116) of 5 residents reviewed for medication availability. This had the potential for residents not to receive medications as their physician's ordered and negatively impact their physical and emotional well-being. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medication Ordering and Receiving from Pharmacy, reviewed 09/2023, indicated, Medications and related products are received from the dispensing pharmacy on a timely basis. The facility maintains accurate records of medication order and receipt. The policy further indicated, 2) If not automatically refilled by pharmacy, repeat medications (refills) are [written on a medication order form/ordered by peeling off the top label from the physician order sheet and placing it in the appropriate area on the order form provided by the pharmacy for that purpose and or ordered electronically]. The policy specified,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility procedure review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide catheter care in a manner to prevent cross contamination and potential infection for 1 (Resident #57) of 1 resident observed for urinary catheter care. This had the potential to contribute to Resident 57 developing unnecessary urinary tract infections. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Indwelling Catheters, last reviewed by the facility in October 2023, revealed, Infection Control: 1. Use standard precautions when handling or manipulating the drainage system. 2. Maintain clean technique when handling or manipulating the catheter, tubing, or drainage bag. An undated facility procedure titled, Providing Catheter Care, provided the step-by-step procedure for maintaining infection control practices while providing catheter care, to include: 12. Applies soap to washcloth and cleans around meatus, using a clean area of the cloth for each stroke. 13. Holds catheter near…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents, and appropriate post fall or post accident care for two of 5 sampled residents (Residents 19 and 81), with a history of falls, when: 1. Resident 19 had five falls within two-months. Neuro (neurological assessments include mental status, motor function, pupillary responses and vital signs) checks were not done according to the facility policy for any of the five falls (all of which were unwitnessed, or the resident hit her head), interventions in the care plan were not implemented during the fall on 1/12/22, post fall injuries sustained on 2/17/22, were not monitored according to the care plan, and the falls care plan was not updated with appropriate interventions, relating to the cause of the falls, which occurred on 1/18/22, 2/17/22, and 3/10/22. This had the potential to result in more falls with major injuries. 2. The facility also failed to ensure the bathroom hot water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated with respect and dignity when one resident (Resident 300), was observed with their backside exposed in the hallway. This failure could lead to this resident feeling exposed, and embarrassed which could lead to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: The facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised 1/11, was reviewed, and indicated that all employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. On 3/17/22 at 7:10 am, Resident 300 was observed in a public hallway wearing a hospital gown that was not closed in the back, and exposed her to public view. There were other residents and staff present in the immediate area at that time. On 3/17/22 7:15 am, Resident 300 was observed being assisted by physical therapy staff (PT A) to ambulate using a walker. Resident 300 was dressed only in a hospital gown that was not fastened in back, and was draping open exposing her sides, and entire back. Resident 300 had on only an incontinence pad (adult diaper), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for 2 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 61, and 81), when: 1. Resident 61 did not have a behavior care plan developed for the use of Seroquel and Zyprexa (both antipsychotic medications, that alter mood and behavior). 2. Resident 81 did not have an accident care plan developed when she hit her chin on her bedrail, and sustained a bruise. These failures had the potential for important medical and emotional services that these residents needed, to go unrecognized and untreated which could lead to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: 1. Resident 61's medical record was reviewed. Resident 61 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, liver cancer, bone cancer, bipolar disorder (mood swings ranging from depression lows to manic highs), and anxiety. On 3/14/22 at 11:15 am, during an interview, Resident 61 stated that he was taking Seroquel and Zyprexa because he felt, scared and his mind races.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0659 — isolated
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was implemented for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 6), when the physician orders for use of a topical cream were not followed and wound treatment was noted to have continued after the wounds were healed. This failure resulted in Resident 6 receiving a medicated cream, in error, and inaccuracies in the medical record. Findings: Resident 6's medical record was reviewed. Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included lung disease, diabetes, and muscle weakness. The nurse's progress note dated 3/5/22, indicated that Resident 6 was receiving treatment for a pressure injury. There was a physician's order dated 1/18/22, for mometasone (steroid medication used to relieve itching, redness, and swelling) cream 0.1% to be applied in a thin layer to small scabbed areas on scalp, discontinue when resolved. During a concurrent interview, and record review, on 3/16/22 at 10:15 am, the Treatment Nurse (TN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 5 sampled resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary drugs when Resident 61 was given Seroquel (an antipsychotic drug that alters mood and behavior) without monitoring the correct indication for use. This had the potential for Resident 61, and his physician to receive incorrect information regarding the effectiveness of the drug and negatively impact Resident 61's psychosocial and emotional well-being. Findings: Resident 61's medical record was reviewed. Resident 61 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, chronic respiratory failure, high blood pressure, liver cancer, bone cancer, bipolar disorder (mood swings ranging from depression lows to manic highs), depression, panic disorder (anxiety) and weight loss. On 3/14/22 at 11:15 am, an observation, and interview, was conducted with Resident 61. He was in his room sitting in a chair and waiting for lunch. He was alert and appropriate with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe storage, and labeling of medications and medical supplies when: 1. A mislabeled blister pack (a package that is pre-filled with medication by a pharmacy) for a pain medication called tramadol (also known as Ultram, a medication to relieve pain)was not consistent with current doctor's order in one out of four sampled residents (Resident 51). 2. Expired medication, and blood test supplies were stored in the active storage areas in one of two medication rooms. This failure resulted in the potential for unsafe medication use, and inaccurate lab test results in the facility which could lead to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation with Licensed Nurse (LN C), on 3/15/22 at 7:48 am, LN C administered Ultram 50 milligrams (mg) to Resident 51. The label on the blister pack read, Tramadol HCL Tab 50 mg [generic for Ultram] take 1 tablet by mouth every 4-hours routine, and 1 tablet twice daily as needed. The Ultram medication label indicated the blister pack had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 9 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the correct psychotropic (affects mind, emotions, behavior) medication for the exhibited behavior per physican order for one of one five sampled residents (Resident 27). This resulted in Resident 27 to receive an unecessary psychotropic medication for four months. Findings: A review of facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, updated on March 2018, indicated Psychotropic medications may be used if medications are necessary to treat specific condition, diagnosed and documented in medical record. Behavioral interventions, unless contraindicated, will be used to meet the individual needs of the residents. 1.Residents will only receive Psychotropic medications when necessary to treat specific condition, diagnosed and documented in medical record. 2.Psychotropic medication management for the resident will involve the facility interdisciplinary team consideration of the following: indication and clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their menus and measure portion sizes correctly for residents receiving Controlled Carbohydrate (CCHO-an eating plan designed to help regulate blood sugar; carbohydrate--food that provides energy) diets during lunch. This had the potential to prevent 32 residents who received a CCHO diet from getting the proper amount of food to meet their nutritional needs. Findings: Review of the facility document titled, Resident Orders, dated 5/2/19, showed that each resident had a diet ordered by a physician based on their individual needs and preferences. Some diets were designed to meet special needs such as ground up to be easy to chew and swallow, or low in salt or fat. CCHO diets were often ordered for residents with diabetes (a disease of blood sugar regulation). These orders were to be followed by the kitchen staff when preparing meals. CCHO plans help stabilize (keep steady) blood sugar levels by creating uniformity (consistency) of carbohydrate intake across all meals. The goal is for the amount of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-02 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently follow their Nutritionally Enhanced Meal (NEM-added extra calories or protein) plans during breakfast. This failure had the potential to prevent some residents from receiving the nutrition needed to maintain their weight and health which could have negatively affected their well-being. Findings: Review of the facility document titled, Resident Orders, dated 5/2/19, showed that each resident had a diet ordered by a physician based on their individual needs and preferences. Some diets were designed to meet special needs such as ground up to have been easy to chew and swallow, or low in salt. The physician's order also contained directions for NEMs. These orders were to be followed by the kitchen staff when they prepared meals. Review of the facility's policy titled, Fortification (enrichment or strengthening) of Food: Increasing Calories and/or Protein in the Diet, dated 1/1/18, showed its purpose was to increase the calories or protein in food to help improve the nutrition status of certain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet food safety requirements when: 1. the kitchen ice machine sanitizer solution was not checked for concentration before use; 2. nutritional supplement shakes stored in the refrigerator were not dated when pulled from the freezer and the temperature of the shakes was 44.2 degrees Fahrenheit (F.); 3. nursing staff did not sanitize their hands between residents when handing out plates of food in the dining room; 4. a plastic scoop was stored inside a container of dry goods during use; 5. kitchen staff did not follow the facility's policy on facial jewelry and beard covers. These practices had the potential to cause harm to all residents by putting them at risk for eating food contaminated by germs or chemicals. Eating contaminated food could have led to complications such as diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, and malnutrition. Findings: 1. Review of an undated facility document titled, Guide to Service, showed a description of icemaker cleaning and sanitizing procedures. The recommended ice machine cleaner was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in safe operating condition when two gaskets (seals) on refrigerator doors were broken. This failure could have caused food to not be stored at safe temperatures. Improper temperatures could have caused a growth of germs in the food that potentially could lead to food borne illness. Findings: During a kitchen observation on 4/29/19 at 9:30 am, the black rubber gaskets on both doors of refrigerator number two were split and separated. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/1/19 at 9:40 am, Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) stated that the entry about the seal on the refrigerator number two door was made after the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) inspection was done on 4/29/19. Review of a facility document titled, Quality Assurance Action Plan, dated 4/23/19, showed a typed entry that read, Replace gaskets on all cold units. Review of a facility document on 5/1/19 at 10:12 am, showed a list of kitchen work orders. Two hand-written entries dated 4/29/19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-02 · tag F0659 — isolated
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's written plan of care for two of 25 sampled residents (Residents 26 and 37) when: 1. The facility did not give the ordered amount of tube feeding for Resident 37. This had the potential to result in additional weight gain. 2. The facility did not give a medication with food as ordered by the physician. This had the potential to cause stomach distress. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 37's record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 37 received all her nutrition and fluids through a feeding tube. A review of the physician's orders indicated an order, dated 3/25/19, to give tube feeding 110 milliliters (ml) for 10 hours (equal to 1100 ml) and 65 ml of water for 10 hours (equal to 650 ml). Both the tube feeding (TF) and water were to start daily at 7 pm. The prior tube feeding order was dated 5/2/18 and was for 110 ml for 11 hours.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of two sampled residents using oxygen (O2), have continuous oxygen applied as ordered by the physician (Resident 81). This failure had the potential that residents could suffer with inadequate oxygenation and respiratory distress and/or shortness of breath (SOB). Findings: The facility policy and procedure titled Oxygen Administration, dated 10/2010, read Steps in the Procedure . 12. Check the mask, tank, humidifying jar, etc to be sure they are in good working order .13. Observe the resident upon setup and periodically thereafter to be sure oxygen is being tolerated . Resident 81's record was reviewed. Resident 81 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- a lung disease that causes narrowing of the airways and difficulty in breathing), pneumonia, shortness of breath, and difficulty walking. Resident 81 made his own health care decisions. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility pharmacy and nurses failed to provide an accurate label for one of one sampled resident receiving IV (Intravenous) medications (Resident 105) when the label had two conflicting infusion rate directions that would result in the medication being delivered over 30 minutes or 60 minutes depending on how the directions were interpreted. This failure had the potential for the medication to be administered at inconsistent infusion rates and at a rate other than prescribed, as well as resident frustration at the inconsistent length of time to administer. Findings: A facility policy titled Medication Labels, revised 8/2014, read: 1) If the physician's direction for use change or the label is inaccurate, the nurse may place a change of order--check chart label on the container indicating there is change in direction for use, taking care not to cover important label information. 2) When such a label appears on the container , the medication nurse checks the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of a lancet (a device used for obtaining blood from a finger), that was contaminated with blood, into a sharps container (a plastic container that prevents access after disposal) and instead discarded the contaminated lancet into a the residents shared bathroom garbage can for one of two tests observed during survey (Resident 123). This failure had the potential for anyone handling the garbage to be subjected to a sharps injury and disease from blood borne illness. Findings: A facility policy titled Sharps Disposal, dated 1/2012, read 1. Whoever uses contaminated sharps (any device that pierces the skin) will discard them immediately or as soon as feasible into designated containers. Resident 123's record was reviewed. Resident 123 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes and long term use of insulin. During an observation on 4/30/19 at 4:49 pm, a blood sugar (BS) glucometer testing of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 52.9+2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 52.5+2.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HUDSON RIVER OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/05/2021
BAY BRIDGE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/05/2021
MANTRI, DINESHIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/01/2007
HOLLINGSWORTH, GREGORYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2018
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$25.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 5%Medicare 30%Other / private 65%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$465per resident / day
operating cost
$14,129per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$536per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555147. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next