No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Delta View Post Acute

1210 A Street, Antioch, CA 94509 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (925) 757-8787 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (925) 757-8787 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 20261 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1811 C St
Pharmacy
20 E 18th St · (925) 757-7161 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2 Wilbur Ave · (925) 777-0879 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(925) 776-3050 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
101 W 9th St · (925) 639-0009

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.9%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.6%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%1.6%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.8%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication4.4%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.2%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.3%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.6%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.0%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.9%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.742.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.921.571.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 145 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
81.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.50U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.27hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Met the expected recovery: 81.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.7%CMS range 52.2–67.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 8.3–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge81.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge82.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge67.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.0–13.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.201.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
1.18
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.45
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
24.2%
Total nursing turnover
46.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 94.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.550 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.450 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-13)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2022-11-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2019-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for one (Resident 184) of 80 sampled residents, when two-person staff assist was not provided while repositioning Resident 184 resulting in her falling out of bed. This failure resulted in Resident 184 sustaining bilateral leg fracture (broken bone). Findings: Review of Resident 184's admission Record dated 10/21/19 showed Resident 184 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Morse Fall Scale-V2 (a fall risk assessment) dated 10/23/19, showed Resident 184 was at High risk for falls due to impaired mobility. During an interview on 11/20/19 at 10:23 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN3) stated Resident 184 fell at 9:55 a.m. on 11/4/19. During an interview on 11/20/19 at 10:57 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CAN) 5 stated after putting an incontinent brief on Resident 184, while Resident 184 was lying in her bed, CNA 5 then turned Resident 184 facing towards the sliding door, away from CNA 5's own body. CNA 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it kept accurate records of controlled medications (medication with a potential for abuse) as evidenced by: 1. The facility failed to ensure, for residents (1-5), the scheduled (controlled medication, narcotic) medication system was complete (all documents available) and accurate (information matched). The record system included Shipping Manifests (pharmacy delivery receipt), Controlled Substance Accountability Sheets (CDR, Controlled Drug Record), Medication Administration Records (MAR, record of medication administration), and destruction logs. The facility records were incomplete. The facility records were inaccurate. These failures had the potential to result in undetected loss and diversion of scheduled medications. In addition, these failures had the potential to result in preventable medication errors (medication not given as ordered).2. The facility failed to ensure, between 9/1/23-12/31/23, the Consultant Pharmacist identified the scheduled (controlled medication, narcotic) medication system…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from physical abuse when Resident 1 and Resident 2 were left without staff supervision and Resident 2 hit Resident 1 on the back of the head two times. This failure had the potential to result in physical, mental and emotional harm for Resident 1.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, printed 4/6/26, the Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with a diagnosis of, Cognitive Communication Deficit. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, printed 4/28/26, the Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with a diagnosis of, Other Cerebral Infarct (brain tissue death due to lack of oxygen). During an interview on 4/28/26, at 1:03 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated on 4/6/26, LVN 1 assessed Resident 1 after Resident 1's alteration with Resident 2. LVN 1 stated Resident 1 had swelling and redness on their head. LVN 1 stated LVN 1 notified the physician, and the physician ordered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assist one out of six residents (Resident 6) with impaired vision and prescription glasses in obtaining timely optometry care. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 6 frustration, decreased independence in managing daily activities, and increased fall risk.During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, printed 4/29/26, the Record indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with a diagnosis of, Dementia in other diseases (cognitive decline and memory loss occurring as a symptom of a primary, underlying condition). During an interview on 4/27/26, at 2:31 p.m., with Resident 6's Responsible Party (RP) 1, RP 1 stated Resident 6 has not had an eye exam and could not see with their glasses. During an interview on 4/29/26, at 1:54 p.m., with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), ADON stated there was no documentation or proof that Resident 6 had an eye exam during their entire stay at the facility. During a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, including an infection surveillance system (an ongoing, systematic, and active monitoring of infections, as well as the practices used to prevent them) to prevent transmission of communicable disease (an infectious illness that can spread from one person to another), during an Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV, a respiratory infection that infects the lungs and breathing passages) infection for two of six sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when:1. Resident 1 who had RSV infection was cohorted (grouping of residents) with other residents during the RSV isolation period without implementation of appropriate transmission-based precautions (also called Isolation Precautions, are actions implemented in addition to standard precautions that are based upon the means of transmission for the infectious agent in order to prevent or control infections)2. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a copy of requested medical records to the legal representative for one of four sampled residents, (Resident 1), until 22 working days from the date facility received the written request.During record review of Resident 1's admission Record printed on 9/18/25 the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to an acute care hospital on 5/1/25.During concurrent interview and record review on 8/7/25 at 12:10 p.m. with the Director of Medical Records (DMR), medical record request for Resident 1 dated 5/22/25 and facility's document titled Records Release log dated May 2020 to August 2025 were reviewed. The medical record request indicated that Resident 1's legal representative requested the following medical records: medical records, billing records, photography, charts and writings relating to Resident 1, admission agreements reviews, utilization review committee records, x-rays. The Records Release log…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to process a record request for Nurse Staff Data for one of four sampled residents, (Resident 1), when Resident 1's representative requested the above information. Nurse staffing data includes facility name, current date, total number of and actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift including Registered Nurses, Licensed Vocational Nurses, Certified Nursing Assistants and resident census.This failure to provide requested Nurse Staff Data resulted in the requested data not being available to Resident 1's representative.During a record review of admission Record printed on 9/18/25, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to an acute care hospital on 5/1/25.During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/7/25 at 12:10 p.m. with the Director of Medical Records, (DMR), facility's document titled Release of Record log dated May 2025 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0836 — isolated
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to be in compliance with the state regulation when they did not provide copies of facility's Policies and Procedures, (P&P), regulatorily required to govern the facility to one of four sampled residents, (Resident 1)'s legal representative upon written request.During a record review of admission Record printed on 9/18/25, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to an acute care hospital on 5/1/25.During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/7/25 at 12:10 p.m. with the Director of Medical Records, (DMR), facility's document titled Release of Record log dated May 2025 to August 2025 and Resident 1's legal representative's record request dated 5/28/25 were reviewed. The record request indicated the facility needed to release, all policies and procedures required by Title 22 California code of Regulations section 72523 including written administrative, management and personnel and patient care policies. The DMR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled residents (Resident 14, Resident 96 and Resident 5) Minimum Data Set (MDS-Resident Assessment and Care Screening tool used to guide care), were accurate when: 1. Resident 14 MDS section A was not coded accurately to reflect Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a federal requirement to ensure that residents are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) PASRR Level II evaluation. Resident 14 MDS section GG was not coded accurately to reflect lower extremities range of motion status. 2. Resident 96, ARD for discharge assessment was coded inaccurately. 3. Resident 5 MDS Section N, was coded inaccurately for antidepressant, antibiotic, anticoagulant and anticonvulsant. These failure had the potential for residents to not receive appropriate care. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 14's admission Record (AR), dated 3/12/25, the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, for one (Resident 3) of two sampled residents, the facility failed to implement its Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team policy and procedure when there was no care plan developed to address Resident 3's gum pain and discomfort with appropriate interventions. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 3 not receiving appropriate care and treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS), Resident Assessment and care guide tool, dated 12/15/24, MDS indicated Resident 3 had a clear speech, able to make self understood had ability to understand others. Resident 3's diagnoses included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (a group of diseases characterized by progressive deficits in behavior, executive function or language). During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/10/25 at 10:57 a.m. with Resident 3 in her room. Resident 3 pointed to her gum area and stated her gum was painful and she had not seen a dentist. Resident 3 stated she felt discomfort with eating for sometime. During an interview on 3/11/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide quality of care to two of 24 sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 10) when the following were noted: 1. Resident 5, with a right hand contracture (muscles, tendons, or tissues get really tight and can't stretch out properly), wore a loosely fitted hand roll which kept coming off and it was difficult for Resident 5 to keep it in the right place. 2. Swelling, black/bluish discoloration and pain in Resident 10's both feet was not addressed for at least two days. These failures resulted in Resident 5 feeling frustrated, getting teary and placed her at risk of discomfort, pain, skin breakdown, and worsening of right hand contracture. Resident 10's untreated swelling, discoloration and pain placed him at risk for further discomfort and potential for compromised blood circulation. Findings: During a record review of Resident 5's admission Record (AR, record with resident 's basic personal information) printed on 3/11/25, the AR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide routine medication, as ordered by the prescriber, and provide pharmaceutical services which includes procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of medications to meet each resident's needs when: 1. Lisinopril (medication to treat high blood pressure) was not available for administration for one of five sampled residents (Resident 304). 2. One of two intravenous (IV, into the vein) drug emergency kits (E-kit) was opened and the IV Drug Emergency Kit Use Form had no accurate record of medication used and was not re-ordered timely. These failures resulted in Resident 304 not receiving the medication as prescribed and had the potential for facility residents with a census of 97 to not receive emergency IV medications when needed. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 304's undated admission Record, the admission Record printed on 3/12/25 indicated, Resident 304 was admitted in the facility on 3/3/25 with a diagnosis of essential hypertension (a condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below five percent for two of five sampled residents (Resident 75 and 304) when: 1. Resident 75 was administered multi-vitamin with minerals instead of multi-vitamins as prescribed by physician's order. 2. Resident 304's toprol xl (medication to treat high blood pressure) extended release (ER) was crushed and administered. 3. Resident 304's lisinopril (medication to treat high blood pressure) was not administered as ordered. These failures resulted in three medication errors out of 28 opportunities during observation of medication administration which resulted in the facility having a medication error rate of 10.71%. These failures also resulted in residents not receiving the correct medication or receiving the medication as prescribed or according to the manufacturer's specification. Finding: 1. During a review of Resident 75's undated admission Record, the admission Record printed on 3/12/25 indicated, Resident 75 was admitted in the facility on 10/26/24 with a diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food waste trash and garbage was disposed of in a sanitary manner when the lid of outside trash container was not closed. This failure had the potential of harborage and feeding of pest. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/10/25 at 9:48 a.m. with Dietary Manager (DM) at the dumpster area located behind the kitchen building, the trash container overflowed with bags of trash and the lid of the container was not closed. DM stated the trash in the container was food waste. During an interview on 3/11/25 at 9:06 a.m. with [NAME] (CK), CK stated food wastes are disposed of into trash can after each shift. CK stated trash container lid was expected to be closed at all times. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Sanitation and Infection Control, dated 2023, the P&P indicated, Outside trash compactors require a protective cover to prevent pests, animals, or debris from falling in. Keep lids of outside trash dumpster's closed.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that was accurately documented when: 1. One of five sampled residents (Resident 302) lidocaine patch (medicine that prevents pain by blocking the signals at the nerve endings in the skin) 5% was documented as administered in the Electronic Medication Administration Record (E-MAR) prior to administration. 2. Facility staff back dated Resident 47's discharge care planning notes. These failures resulted in Resident 47 and 302's medical record to reflect inaccurate clinical information. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 302's undated admission Record, the admission Record printed on 3/12/25 indicated, Resident 302 was admitted in the facility on 2/28/25 with a diagnosis of cellulitis (bacterial infection of the skin and underlying tissues) of the left lower limb. During medication administration observation on 3/11/25 at 8:52 a.m., RN 1 was observed preparing and administering one lidocaine patch 5% to Resident 302's back. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 3/11/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary environment to prevent transmission of infections for three (Resident 21, 24 and 247) of eleven sampled residents when; 1. Resident 21's urinary drainage bag laid on the floor; 2. Resident 247's urinary bag was touching the floor without privacy cover. 3. Resident 24's tube feeding pole had dried light mater sticking on it; tube feeding pole is a portable, vertical pole used to support and hold the bag of formula or medication during tube feeding. This failure placed the residents at increased risk for healthcare associated infections. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 21's Annual-Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment and care guide tool), dated 9/19/24, the MDS indicated Resident 21's Basic Interview of Mental status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to fifteen is an indication of intact cognitive status.)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written discharge notice within the expected time frame to Resident, Resident Representative, and Ombudsman, for one of six sampled residents, Resident 95. Findings: During record review of Resident 95's Face Sheet (FC), the FC indicated that Resident 95 is [AGE] years old male, admitted to the facility in 2025. During record review of Resident 95's Progress Notes (PN), dated 12/22/2024, PN indicated, Patient sent out to the hospital from dialysis [NAME] due to 8/10 chest pain and short of breath .So they call on call MD [Medical Doctor, physician name redacted] for patient being sent out to the hospital. During an interview on 03/12/25 at 11:41 a.m., with Social Services Director (SSD), SSD stated she did not fill out the notice of transfer when Resident 95 was transferred to the hospital in December 2024. SSD stated she went back into Resident 95's chart in February 2025, and created a late entry document for the notice of transfer. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to meet professional standards of quality for one of one sampled resident (Resident 302) when Resident 302's lidocaine patch (medicine that prevents pain by blocking the signals at the nerve endings in the skin) 5% was not removed according to physician's order. This failure resulted in Resident 302 to receive excessive dose of lidocaine in a 24-hour period. Findings: During a review of Resident 302's undated admission Record, the admission Record printed on 3/12/25 indicated, Resident 302 was admitted in the facility on 2/28/25 with a diagnosis of cellulitis (bacterial infection of the skin and underlying tissues) of the left lower limb. During a concurrent medication administration observation and interview, on 3/11/25 at 8:52 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, in Resident 302's room, RN 1 removed one lidocaine patch with handwritten letters JS and numbers 3/10 from Resident 302's back. RN 1 stated the lidocaine patch she removed was the patch she had applied yesterday morning. RN 1 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to maintain physical and psychosocial well-being for one of twenty four sampled residents (Resident 44) when Resident 44 was not positioned properly in the dining room prior to eating lunch. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 44 aspiration and emotional distress. Findings: During a review of Resident 44's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment and care guide tool), dated 1/8/25, the MDS indicated Resident 44's Basic Interview of Mental status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to fifteen is an indication of intact cognitive status.) Resident 44's score was 10 (meaning mild cognitive impairment). MDS indicated Resident 44 had clear speech, able to express ideas and wants, make self-understood and understood others. MDS indicated Resident 44 need helper assistance prior to or following eating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report a verbal abuse allegation made by one of four sampled residents (Resident 3) against a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) to the required agencies, including California Department of Public Health, Long Term Care Ombudsman and Local Law Enforcement agency. This failure resulted in facility not responding to abuse allegation appropriately and placed Resident 3 at risk for experiencing further unreported abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record printed on 1/12/24, the record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 12/8/23. During a review of Resident 3 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment used to plan care), the assessment indicated Resident 3 had a BIMS (a tool used to assess a resident ' s level of awareness and thinking) score of 13 out of 15, indicating Resident 3 was cognitively intact and was able to make his needs known and understood. During a phone interview with CNA 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a verbal abuse allegation by one of four sampled residents (Resident 3) against Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1). Facility did not remove CNA 1 from resident care areas and did not complete and/or report the results of investigation to California Department of Public Health (CDPH) within 5 working days of the incident. This failure resulted in facility not responding to abuse allegation appropriately and placed Resident 3 and other residents residing at the facility at risk for experiencing further unreported abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record printed on 1/12/24, the record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 12/8/2023. During a review of Resident 3 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment used to plan care), the record indicated Resident 3 had a BIMS (a tool used to assess a resident ' s level of awareness and thinking) score of 13 out of 15,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when the facility did not have oxygen tubing labeled for 2 of 6 residents (Residents 10 and 12) receiving oxygen. The facility did not have tubing or nasal cannula (pronged tubing that sits in nostrils to deliver oxygen) stored in a plastic bag when not in use for one of six residents (Resident 10) receiving oxygen, and the nasal cannula and tubing were on the floor. These failures placed Residents 10 and 12 at risk for healthcare-associated infections. Findings: During a review of Resident 10 ' s admission Record dated 12/15/23, the admission Record indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in October 2023. During a review of Resident 10 ' s Order Summary Report dated 12/15/23, the Order Summary Report indicated an order, dated 10/24/23, for oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed. During a review of Resident 12 ' s admission Record dated 12/15/23, the admission Record indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in May 2023.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had four medication errors out of 28 medication pass observations which resulted in an error rate of 14.29%. Physician Orders were not followed during medication administration for Resident 67 and 63. For Resident 67, this had a potential to cause poor pain control when Lidocaine 5% patches (a patch with local anesthetic applied to skin to help control pain) were cut in half, and another 1/2 patch was applied on the left knee without physician orders. For Resident 63, Cozaar 50 milligram (mg) tablet (a type of medication that helps manage high blood pressure), was not given and could result in poor management of high blood pressure. Findings: 1. During an observation and interview on 11/15/22 at 08:40 a.m., with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, RN 1 stated they would prepare Resident 67's medications that included Lidocaine 5% patches. RN 1 removed two Lidocaine 5% patches for Resident 67 from the medication cart. RN 1 opened one Lidocaine 5% patch and cut it in half, then wrote the current date and initial. RN 1 opened the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 80) had an accurate discharge assessment. Resident 80 was discharged to the community. This deficient practice had the potential to cause improper planning for Resident 80's care upon discharge from the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 80's face sheet on 11/17/22, the face sheet indicated Resident 80 was admitted to the facility in 2022. During a review of Resident 80's discharged summary, dated 9/3/22, the discharge summary indicated under disposition, Resident 80 was discharged to an Assisted Living (a type of housing in a community setting for people who need various levels of medical and personal care). During a review of Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool used to direct health care needs) dated, 9/3/22; Section A2100 indicated 03 which meant Resident 80 was discharged to an Acute Care Hospital. During a concurrent interview and record review, with the MDS Coordinator (MDSC), on 11/17/22, at 11:11 a.m., the MDSC stated, the Discharge MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 75), the facility failed to develop an individualized nursing care plan to address Resident 75's right and left arm discolorations. This failure had the potential for Resident 75 to have delayed and or inappropriate care. Findings: During an observation on 11/14/22, at 12:13 p.m., observed Resident 75 with multiple purplish marks on their right and left arms. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/15/22, at 10:33 a.m., with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), observed Resident 75's arms. ADON stated Resident 75 had multiple discolorations on their right and left arms. During a record review of Resident 75's Weekly Skin Assessment, dated 10/31/22, the assessment indicated Resident 75 had skin discolorations on both arms and hands. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/17/22, a 10:12 a.m., with the ADON, reviewed Resident 75's care plans. ADON stated Resident 75 did not have a nursing care plan for their skin discolorations on their right and left arms. ADON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate fingernail care for two of 18 sampled residents (Residents 19 and 26). This failure had the potential to cause Residents 19 and 26 injury, pain and infection. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/15/22, at 10:42 a.m., with Resident 19, Resident 19's fingernails were observed long with dark gray matter under the fingernails of both hands. Resident 19 stated staff had never cut residents fingernails. Resident 19 stated it made them feel upset. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/15/22, at 11:01 p.m. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Resident 19's fingernails were observed. ADON stated Resident 19's fingernails were, long and a little dirty. ADON stated Resident 19's fingernails needed to be cut. During an interview on 11/16/22, at 3:07 p.m., with ADON, ADON stated staff should have cleaned Resident 19's fingernails. ADON stated long and dirty fingernails were a risk for infection and pain. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/15/22, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not destroy the controlled substance (CS - drug or other substance that is tightly controlled by the government because it may be abused or cause addiction), to render it unusable after removing them in their individual packaging. This deficient practice could result in a potential case of controlled substance diversion. Findings: During an observation and interview on 11/15/22 at 3:15 p.m., with Director of Nurses (DON) in the presence of Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) in the DON's office, DON grabbed a gallon sized plastic container with gray colored top from behind their chair. Observed the inside of the container which contained a dark dry substance wrapped in thin plastic, dry whole capsules, and tablets. DON stated that the medications inside the container were the controlled substances that were Destroyed back in October by her and the pharmacist. DON stated when the pharmacist was in the facility, they verified the number of tablets/capsules from the bubble pack or bottle, removed them from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices by failing to wear hair restraints while inside kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to spread food borne illnesses. Findings: During a follow up observation of the kitchen and concurrent interview, on 11/14/22, at 10:15 a.m., observed a dishwasher repair vender not wearing a hairnet. Vendor stated they have been inside facility kitchen many times to work on the dishwasher and was never asked to wear a hairnet by the kitchen staff. Also observed maintenance staff enter the kitchen without a hairnet. Maintenance staff walked through the kitchen and exited out of the rear door. Maintenance staff stated they did not wear a hairnet because they were never asked to wear hairnet inside kitchen. During an interview on 11/14/22, at 10:17 a.m., with Dietary Manager (DM), the DM stated, all staff are required to wear hairnets inside the kitchen. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Food Safety and Sanitation, dated 2017,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (Resident 43 and 42) of 80 sampled residents received an accurate assessment when: 1. Resident 42's Minimal Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) did not reflect ambulation and range of motion (ROM) services being provided during the Restorative Nurse Aide (RNA) program. 2. Resident 43's MDS was inaccurately coded for using no bed rails when bed rails were being used every day. This failure resulted in Resident 42 and 43's MDS's to reflect inaccurate clinical status. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 42's MDS dated [DATE] showed Resident 42 walked in corridor only once or twice and did not receive RNA services for ROM exercises and walking in 7-day look back period (reference period for the assessment). During a concurrent interview and review of Resident 42's Restorative Nursing Care Flow Record dated 9/2019 and 10/2019, with RNA 1 on 11/20/19 at 8:13 a.m., RNA 1 confirmed Resident 42 was receiving 15 minutes of ROM and 15 minutes of walking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-11-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for one (Resident 70) of 80 sampled residents, the facility failed to address resident's significant weight loss. This failure resulted in Resident 70's fifteen percent weight loss over six months. Findings: Review of the admission Record indicated Resident 70 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple medical history including, Diabetes (high blood sugar), Dysphagia and Muscle Weakness. During an observation and concurrent interview on 11/18/19 at 8:45 a.m., Resident 70 was awake in bed. Resident 70 stated that she did not like hard foods because it was hard to chew. Resident 70 added she had missing teeth. Review of physician's order dated 11/4/19 indicated, Consistent Carbohydrate, No Added Salt diet, Regular texture . Review of the MD orders dated 10/9/19 indicated, Dental evaluation and treatment as indicated. In an interview with SSD2 on 11/21/19 10:27 a.m., SSD2 stated dental consent was not completed and was overlooked since admission. SSD2 added Resident 70…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-11-22 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, explain risks and benefits and obtain an informed consent prior to using bed rails for six of (Resident 43, 186, 79, 42, 47, and 36) of 80 sampled residents. This failure had the potential for the above listed 6 residents to suffer from avoidable and hazardous accidents such as entrapment, entanglement, skin injuries, and the feeling of isolation, agitation, due to being restrained. Findings: During an observation on 11/18/19 at 10:00 a.m., Residents 43, 186, 79, 42, 47, and 36 were noted with bilateral half/quarter bed rails up while they were lying in bed. During a concurrent interview and Resident 43's medical record review on 11/18/19 at 2:07 p.m., Infection Control Nurse (ICN) confirmed Resident 43 was not assessed and/ or had physician's orders, and/ or had informed consent for use of bed rails. During an interview on 11/18/19 at 2:18 p.m., the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 3) stated We do not do bed rail assessment if it's not a full bed rail. During an interview with the Clinical Leader (CL1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-11-22 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe storage of laboratory test supplies when expired laboratory sample collection kits were found stored with currently used laboratory collection kits. This failure had the potential to jeopardize the quality of the collected data and could result in inaccurate result impacting physician's treatment decisions. Findings: During an observation on [DATE] at 11:01 a.m. the following laboratory biological test kits were found in the Dirty Utility Room: 1. Three E-Swabs Collection Transport System for Aerobic (requiring oxygen), Anaerobic (not requiring oxygen) and Fastidious (requiring specific nutrient) Bacteria test kits with expiration date of [DATE] were stored in the drawer mixed with currently used laboratory test kits. 2. Four Nasopharyngeal Sample Collection Kits for Viruses with Expiration date of [DATE] were stored in the drawer mixed with currently used laboratory test kits. In an interview with the Licensed Vocational…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure for food storage, when following food items were stored in freezer section of Medication room [ROOM NUMBER]'s Medication Refrigerator: a. One undated and unlabeled brown colored drink frozen hard in a Jack in the Box plastic cup. b. One undated and unlabeled, with no open date, box of Fudgsicles with 11 fudgsicles left in the box. This failure resulted in facility not following its safe food handling practices. Findings: During a medication room [ROOM NUMBER] observation accompanied by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 on 11/18/19 at 10:30 a.m., one undated, unlabeled brown colored frozen hard drink in [NAME] in the Box plastic cup was stored in Medication Refrigerator's freezer section. LVN 3 stated she did not know who did the drink belong to and she threw it away. LVN 3 then took out a box of Fudgsicles from the freezer section. The box was unlabeled and undated and has 11 fudgsicles left inside. LVN 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-11-22 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to safely store and reheat residents' food brought in by family/visitors. This failure resulted in residents to waste the leftovers brought in families and/or visitors and feel left out at the facility. Findings: During medication room rounds with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 on 11/18/19 at 10:26 a.m., LVN 3 stated staff was not reheating residents' leftover foods brought in by family/visitors. LVN 3 stated Kitchen had told nursing staff to not reheat the food. During an interview with the Facility Manager (FM) on 11/18/19 at 11:30 a.m., the FM stated We do not have enough space to have residents' food, so we do not encourage them to keep the leftovers. We tell them to either finish the food or visitors should take the leftovers. Review of Resident Council Suggestion dated 10/29/19 showed, Resident are concerned that they no longer have a place to heat up their food. During the Resident Council Meeting on 11/19/19 at 11:07 a.m., Residents expressed Food would taste better if it was hot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection prevention practices when following were observed: 1. Two sets of personal clothing items were stored in medication room [ROOM NUMBER] at the nursing station; 2. Resident 51's oxygen cannula attached to nebulizer was not changed for 15 days. This failure had the potential to spread infections to the residents whose medications were stored and/or prepared in the medication room [ROOM NUMBER] and Resident 51 to suffer from respiratory infections from using the oxygen cannula that was not changed per facility's policy. Findings: 1. During an observation of Medication room [ROOM NUMBER], accompanied by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 3) on 11/18/19 at 10:26 a.m., One black jacket with hoodie and one blue colored full sleeve female top were hanging on a hook on the back of the medication room door. LVN 3 stated staff at nursing station 2 did not know who did the clothing items belonged to. LVN 3 further stated staff should not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet per resident for residents who occupied the following multiple resident bedrooms: Rooms 1, 3, 5.6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37 and 39. This failure had the potential to result in a lack of sufficient space for the provision of care by facility staff and for the lack of sufficient space for residents to have personal belongings at the bedside. Findings: In an observation and concurrent interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) on 11/19/19 at 10:30 a.m., MS measured the resident's bedrooms. MS stated that there were no complaints from the residents and staff regarding the size of the bedrooms. The following multiple resident rooms were identified having below the required 80 square feet requirement per resident: Room Activity Number of Beds Floor Area 1 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER] 75.75 sq.ft/bed 3 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER] 75.56 sq.ft/bed 5 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER] 76.23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three (Resident 79, 48, 42) of 80 sampled residents were provided with a clean and sanitary environment, when thick, dark brown, dried matter was sticking all over the commode and toilet bowl in a shared bathroom between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 22. This failure resulted in Resident 79, 48 and 42 to not receive a clean, sanitary and homelike environment. Findings: During an observation of shared bathroom between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 22, accompanied by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 4) on 11/8/19 at 10:08 a.m. thick dark brown matter was sticking inside toilet bowl and all over a light blue colored commode placed over the toilet bowl. CNA 4 was unable to state what was sticking on the toilet bowl and the commode. During another observation of the bathroom with CNA 4 and Housekeeper (HK 1) on 11/8/19 at 10:12 a.m., HK 1 stated its pee (urine) pointing towards the stains on the toilet bowl. HK 1 then stated commode was old and should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and records review, for one (Resident 63) of 80 sampled residents the facility failed to monitor and develop a nursing care plan to address Resident 63's Left Lower Leg edema (swelling). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 63's condition went unnoticed or delayed for treatment. Findings: Review of the admission Record indicated Resident 63 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis including, Diabetes (high blood sugar). Review of the physician's (MD) order, dated 11/4/19, indicated, Ultrasound (a test that uses high-frequency sound waves to measure the amount of blood flow through the arteries and veins) Left Lower Extremity. In an observation and concurrent interview on 11/19/19 at 1:03 p.m., Resident 63 was awake sitting in a wheelchair by her bed. Resident 63 stated her left lower leg was swollen. Resident 63 stated that her leg hurts a little but she got pain medicine from the nurses. In an interview with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide quality of care to two (Resident 184 and 73) of 80 sampled residents, when: 1. the facility failed to reassess pain for Resident 184 after she was given Tylenol for pain due to a fall. 2. For Resident 73, an initial smoking assessment was not completed. This failure resulted in Resident 184 to stay in pain for four hours until she was transferred to Acute Care Hospital (ACH) 1 where she was diagnosed with bilateral lower extremities fractures. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 184's Minimal Data Set (MDS- An assessment tool used to guide care) dated 10/19/19 showed Resident 184 is cognitively intact. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/20/19 at 10:23 a.m., LVN 3 stated at 9:55 a.m. on 11/4/19, Resident 184 was lying on her back on the floor between the bed and the sliding door stating her legs were hurting. LVN 3 stated Resident 184 had abrasions on both knees, and a skin tear on the right arm. LVN 3 stated she provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-22 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order to provide routine dental services for two (Residents 19 and 70) of 81 sampled residents, when: 1. Resident 19 did not receive routine follow up dental services for broken and decayed teeth. 2. Resident 70 did not receive routine dental services since admission. These failures had the potential to cause resident avoidable dental issues and weight loss. Findings: 1. Review of the admission Record indicated Resident 19 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis including, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and Diabetes (high blood sugar). In an observation and concurrent interview with Resident 19 on 11/18/19 at 09:10 a.m., Resident 19 was awake in bed complaining that it has been awhile since she saw a dentist. Resident 19 added that she would like her broken teeth fixed. Review of the physician's order dated 4/1/16, indicated, Dental evaluation and Treatment as needed. Review of the Dentist progress notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet per resident for residents who occupied the following multiple resident bedrooms: Rooms 1, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, and 39. This failure had the potential to result in a lack of sufficient space for the provision of care by facility staff and a lack of sufficient space for residents to have personal belongings at the bedside. Findings: During random interviews and observations of care and services from 03/10/25 to 03/13/25, there was sufficient space for the provision of care for the residents in all rooms. There was no heavy equipment kept in the rooms that might interfere with residents' care, and each resident had adequate personal space and privacy. There were no complaints from residents regarding insufficient space for their belongings. There were no negative consequences attributed to the decreased space and/or safety concerns…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet per resident for residents who occupied the following multiple resident bedrooms: Rooms A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, AA, and BB This failure had the potential to result in a lack of sufficient space for the provision of care by facility staff and a lack of sufficient space for residents to have personal belongings at the bedside. Findings: During random interviews and observations of care and services from 11/14/22 to 11/17/22, there was sufficient space for the provision of care for the residents in all rooms. There was no heavy equipment kept in the rooms that might interfere with residents' care, and each resident had adequate personal space and privacy. There were no complaints from residents regarding insufficient space for their belongings. There were no negative consequences attributed to the decreased space and/or safety concerns in the identified rooms. During a record review of the Client Accommodations Analysis, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DHUGGA, GURPREETIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/17/2023
HADLEY, MATTHEWIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/08/2024
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 10%Medicare 15%Other / private 75%

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$482per resident / day
operating cost
$14,642per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$536per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056381. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next