Auburn Oaks Care Center
3400 Bell Road, Auburn, CA 95603 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (530) 888-6257 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 25.4% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.8% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.1% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.6% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.2% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.43 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.55 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
64.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 283 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 81.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 64.9%CMS range 58.7–70.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.7%CMS range 6.1–11.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 81.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 74.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 81.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 94.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 4.1–9.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 94.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.31 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide safe supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 fell on the ground while being transferred from bed to shower chair by 2 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA 1 and CNA 2) who failed to follow the proper maneuvering and operation of a Hoyer lift (a mechanical device used to lift and/or transfer a person from one surface to another) during the transfer and when CNA 2 was behind the shower chair away from the Hoyer lift. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a right ankle sprain (a soft tissue injury that occurs when ligaments are stretched or torn), back pain, and developed fear of being moved out of bed using a lift. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission records, the records indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in December 2023 with diagnoses that included morbid obesity (having too much body fat), muscle weakness, fibromyalgia (pain and tenderness throughout the body), and difficulty in walking.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain an informed consent for a dental procedure from one of three sampled residents (Resident 1's) Responsible Party (RP) in a census of 96.This failure compromised the resident's right to make informed decision regarding their care and resulted in Resident 1 receiving a dental procedure they had not agreed to or fully understood. Findings:Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility in the winter of 2026 with diagnoses which included subarachnoid hemorrhage (a type of stroke), cognitive communication deficit (a communication problem) and encephalopathy (any disease, damage, or malfunction that alters brain function which causes mental state changes, such as confusion, and memory loss) and long term use of anticoagulants (blood thinning medication).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 2/5/26, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had moderate memory impairment.During a review of Resident 1's face sheet, the Responsible Party was indicated as Family Member (FM) 1.During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for two of 24 sampled residents (Resident 41 and Resident 31), when:1. Resident 41's administered oxygen amount did not match the physician's order, and 2. Resident 31 received tramadol (an opioid analgesic for pain) on 12/6/25, 12/7/25, 12/27/25, and 12/28/25 without having scheduled physical therapy (PT) sessions as per physician order.These failures decreased the facility's potential to follow the residents' physician orders as prescribed.Findings: 1. A review of an admission record indicated Resident 41 was admitted to the facility in the winter of 2025 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung condition which makes it harder to breathe out because the airways become narrowed, inflamed, or damaged, trapping air and making you feel short of breath) and respiratory failure. During an observation on 1/5/26 at 10:49 a.m., Resident 41's oxygen concentrator was observed to be at 3.5 liters (L; a unit of volume measurement) per minute. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for a census of 93 residents, when:1. Resident bowls and food containers were found stacked upright in the drying area;2. Unsealed bags of food were found in the refrigerator and freezer; and3. Unlabeled food items were found in the refrigerator.These failures decreased the facility's potential to prevent foodborne illness among vulnerable residents eating facility prepared food.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/5/26 at 8:20 a.m. with the Registered Dietitian (RD) and the Dietary Manager (DM), several resident bowls and containers were observed stacked upright in the air-drying area. RD confirmed the observation.A review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code 2022, Section 4-901.11, indicated, After cleaning and sanitizing, equipment, and utensils: (A) Shall be air-dried . The guidance further indicated, Items must be allowed to drain and to air-dry before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 112), when a transition strip (a narrow piece of material [often metal, wood, or vinyl] used to cover and protect the seam where two different types of flooring meet) between Resident 112's bedroom and bathroom was not securely affixed.This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent Resident 112 from a fall, injury or harm due to tripping hazard.Findings:A review of an admission record indicated Resident 112 was admitted to the facility in late 2025 with a diagnosis of difficulty in walking.A review of Resident 112's Minimum Data Set (a standardized assessment tool used in nursing homes), dated 12/30/25, indicated Resident 112 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicating intact cognitive function. MDS also indicated Resident 112 used a walker and wheelchair for ambulation.During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/5/26 at 8:54 a.m. with Resident 112, a transition strip between the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent an elopement (the act of leaving a facility unsupervised and without prior authorization) for one resident (Resident 5) of a census of 96, when Resident 5 was found by a family member walking down the street outside the facility and standing at a traffic light intersection.This failure decreased the facility's potential to maintain Resident 5's safety.Findings:A review of Resident 5's admission Record, indicated he was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including moderate dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life, involving memory loss and reasoning issues) with behavioral disturbance, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD-a mental health condition associated with experiencing an event that was traumatic, terrifying, or life-threatening), and difficulty in walking. The record further indicated Resident 5's spouse was his responsible party.A review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 10/2/25, indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the right to be free from abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 2 pushed Resident 1's plate of food onto her chest and landed in her lap which affected Resident 1's emotional well-being. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not free from abuse by Resident 2. Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in July 2017 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular diseases (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side (decreased ability to move and muscle weakness on left side), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and anxiety disorder (any group of mental conditions characterized by excessive fear of real or perceived threats). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-A federally mandated resident assessment too), dated 6/13/25 indicated Resident 1 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of Nurse's note for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure needed care or services were provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's use of postoperative boot (designed to protect and support the foot while healing from injuries) after a fall for right ankle sprain (a soft tissue injury that occurs when ligaments are stretched or torn) was not monitored and evaluated. This failure decreased the facility's ability to evaluate Resident 1's response to intervention and had the potential to result in Resident 1's increased risk for skin breakdown related to the use of the boot. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission records, the records indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in December 2023 with diagnoses that included morbid obesity ( having too much body fat), muscle weakness, fibromyalgia (pain and tenderness throughout the body), and difficulty in walking. Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy for pronouncing death for one resident (Resident 1) in a census of 96 when two licensed vocational nurses (LVNs) worked out of their scope of practice (services that a trained health professional is deemed competent to perform and permitted to undertake according to the terms of their professional nursing license) and pronouced the resident's death. This failure resulted in a violation of the facility's policy and had the potential to jeopardize resident health and safety. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses that included Chronic Respiratory Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). A review of Resident 1's, Order Summary Report dated [DATE], indicated an order for hospice (an end-of-life service for the terminally ill) for a diagnosis of COPD. During an interview with Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) on [DATE] at 9:47 a.m., RN1 stated, Only a physician or RN can pronounce a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of 5 sampled residents (Resident 2) from physical abuse when Resident 2 ' s hands were grabbed by Resident 1. This resulted in Resident 2 sustaining a scratch to her face and felt unsafe in the room. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated she was admitted with diagnoses including cerebral infarction due to occlusion or stenosis of small artery (a type of stroke caused by blockage of blood flow to the brain) and schizophrenia (mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior). A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/3/24 indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 1 ' s undated care plan indicated, [Resident 1] has impaired cognitive function or impaired thought processes r/t [related to] BIMS [Brief Interview of Mental Status - an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure confidentiality was maintained for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 1 received Resident 2's labeled medication cards upon discharge by mistake. This failure resulted in Resident 2's confidential information being provided to an unauthorized recipient. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with multiple diagnoses including orthopedic aftercare for fusion of spine (surgery to connect two or more bones in the spine) and spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spaces in the spinal canal). A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke- blood flow to the brain is blocked). A review of Resident 1's Discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe discharge home for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was discharged home with another resident's (Resident 2) medications. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to take the wrong medications causing adverse effects. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with multiple diagnoses including orthopedic aftercare for fusion of spine (surgery to connect two or more bones in the sine) and spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spaces in the spinal canal). A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke- blood flow to the brain is blocked). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-03 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations (PEs) for three of five sampled certified nursing assistants (CNAs; CNA 3, CNA 4, and CNA 5), for a census of 95. This failure increased the risk of residents receiving poor-quality care from the CNAs. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/2/24 at 2:48 p.m. with the Director of Staffing Development (DSD) and the Consultant of Director of Staffing Development/Infection preventionist (CDSD/IP), the DSD and CDSD/IP reviewed CNA 3, CNA 4, and CNA 5's employee's files and found the following: CNA 3 was hired on 7/30/19, CNA 4 was hired on 12/26/20, and CNA 5 was hired on 8/31/09. All the CNAs files reviewed had no documented evidence the annual PEs were done. The DSD stated, I have not completed any employee's performance evaluations PEs in 2023 to 2024 . During a concurrent interview and record review, on 10/3/24 at 9:15 a.m. with the Administrator (ADM) and the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated, The PEs are completed by the DSD and are used to identify…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services in accordance with acceptable professional standards of quality were provided for four of 25 sampled residents (Resident 143, Resident 144, Resident 36, and Resident 85), when: 1. Medication and ointments were left at the nightstand of Resident 143; 2. Medication, hazardous liquids and ointments were left at the bedside of Resident 144; 3. A medication was not administered completely and left at the bedside, and oxygen tank was empty while in use for Resident 36; and 4. The oxygen (O2) saturation levels were not monitored for Resident 85. These failures had the potential risks to negatively affect the residents' health status. Findings: 1. Resident 143 was admitted in late 2024 with diagnoses which included peripheral vascular disease [decreased blood flow to the arms and legs], communication deficit, difficulty walking, and lack of coordination. During a review of Resident 143's Baseline Care Plan (BCP), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Controlled substance medications (medication with a high potential for abuse and addiction) were accurately accounted for on the medication administration record (MAR) and the Controlled Drug Record (CDR) for four of five randomly selected residents (Residents 3, 22, 75 and 78); and 2. An antibiotic emergency kit (e-kit; a kit/box containing medications and supplies for immediate use during a medical emergency) was replaced timely after being opened and medications were removed. These failures resulted in the facility not having accurate accountability of controlled medications and potential for abuse or misuse of these medications, the potential for emergency medications to be unavailable when needed, and the potential for not meeting the residents' therapeutic needs or worsening of their medical conditions. Findings: 1. Resident 3 had a physician's order dated 9/16/24, for hydrocodone/acetaminophen (a medication to treat pain)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a process to ensure clinical rationale was documented when no changes were made to medications in response to identified irregularities and recommendations by the pharmacy consultant (PC) for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 83). This failure had the potential to result in medication-related problems, errors, or irregularities identified and reported by the PC, and the potential for unnecessary medications (such as prolonged use, excessive dose, unmonitored use, duplication, etc.) for the resident. Findings: A review of Resident 83's medical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis including Huntington's disease (an inherited disorder that causes nerve cells in parts of the brain to gradually break down and die), anxiety, insomnia, dementia, high blood pressure, depression, and repeated falls. A review of the Resident 83's medical record indicated she had physician's orders for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were not available for resident use, medications with shorter expiration dates after use were labeled with an open date, single-use medications were discarded after use, medications were labeled with a pharmacy label, and medications in medication carts were stored in a clean, safe and orderly manner in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). These failures had the potential for residents to receive medications with unsafe or reduced potency from being used past their expiration date or improper storage, and diversion or misuse of medications from not being safely stored. Findings: During an inspection on 9/30/24 at approximately 11 a.m. of the Central Supply, alongside Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), three tubes Skintegrity Hydrogel (a topical used for wound care) expired 2/2024 and two vials EvenCare G3 blood glucose test strips (used to test blood sugar) expired 6/2024 were identified. ADON confirmed the finding and stated expired items were to be removed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for a total of 95 residents who received facility prepared foods, when: 1. Proper food labeling was not followed; 2. Expired foods were not discarded; 3. Undated box of loose bananas with dark brown to black discoloration and leaking fluids were stored in the walk-in refrigerator; and 4. Several wet steam table pans were found stacked at the clean and ready-to-use storage areas. These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 9/30/24 beginning at 8:40 a.m. the following items were observed not having proper labeling: Inside the dry storage: Unlabeled and opened clear plastic bag of coconut flakes with no opened or used date. Inside the walk-in refrigerator: Opened resealable plastic bag of diced onion with no opened or used by date; and Unlabeled and opened clear plastic bag of cut celery sticks with no opened or used by date. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program for four of 25 sampled residents (Resident 148, Resident 36, Resident 1 and Resident 3), when: 1. A hand held nebulizer (HHN, breathing treatment device) and a nasal cannula (tubing that delivers oxygen) were unlabeled and undated for Resident 148; 2. A nasal cannula and HHN with expired dates were found at the nightstand of Resident 36; 3. Resident 1's oxygen (O2) tubing and face mask was not labeled or dated; and 4. Resident 3 O2 tubing and face masks were not labeled or dated and the antimicrobial bag was labeled with an expired date. These failures increased the potential risk for respiratory infection. Findings: 1. Resident 148 was admitted in late 2024 with diagnoses which included pulmonary edema (fluid in the lung causing cough with extreme difficulty of breathing), muscle weakness and swallowing difficulty. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 10:23 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) accurately reflected the resident's current condition for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 92), when the discharge MDS indicated the resident was discharged to an acute hospital. This failure resulted in Resident 92's MDS inaccurate assessment data submitted to CMS (Centers for Medicare-Medicaid Services). Findings: Resident 92 was admitted to the facility in the middle 2024 with multiple diagnoses which included heart failure and difficulty in walking. During a review of Resident 92's Physician Orders (PO), dated 8/20/24, the PO indicated, Discharge to home with medications . During a review of Resident 92's Nurse's Note (NN), dated 8/21/24 at 10:17 a.m., the NN indicated, Pt [patient] is discharging to home today . During a review of Resident 92's Nurse Practitioner Note (NPN), dated 8/21/24 at 3:04 p.m., the NPN indicated, .resident noted to be discharging to go home today . During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed or implemented for three out of 25 sampled residents (Resident 36, Resident 148, and Resident 85), when: 1. Resident 148 had no care plan for a newly ordered respiratory treatment; 2. Resident 36's respiratory treatment and oxygen (O2) therapy care plan was not implemented; and 3. Resident 85's O2 therapy care plan was not implemented. These failures increased the potential risk to result in the residents not attaining their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 148 was admitted in late 2024 with diagnoses which included pulmonary edema (fluid in the lungs causing cough with extreme difficulty of breathing), muscle weakness and swallowing difficulty. During a review of Resident 148's Physician Orders (PO), dated [DATE], the PO indicated, Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution [combination medication used to treat obstructive lung disease] .3 ml [milliliter, volume…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 29 was admitted to the facility in early 2024 with diagnoses which included spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal in the lower part of the back), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids), and unspecified dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities). During a review of Resident 29's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 29's cognition as moderately impaired. The MDS reflected that Resident 29 required supervision, verbal cues, and touching/steadying assistance when eating. During a review of Resident 29's care plan (CP), dated 8/5/24, the CP indicated Resident 29 was on, 1:1 assist and needs encouragement and sometimes feeding assist .Eats in dining room for most meals. During a dinning observation on 9/30/24 at 12:50 p.m. Resident 29 did not receive 1:1 assistance after the staff placed her meal in front of her. During a review of Resident 29's meal ticket, dated 9/30/24, the meal ticket indicated Resident 29's assist instruction which included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed in accordance with professional standards for two of 25 sampled residents (Resident 85 and Resident 71), when: 1. Resident 85's oxygen (O2) was not administered as ordered and O2 saturation level was not monitored; and 2. Resident 71's insulin medication was administered outside of physician ordered parameters. These failures increased the potential risk for the decline in the residents' health status and well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 85 was admitted in the middle of 2024 with diagnoses which included lung cancer, pulmonary fibrosis (scarred lung tissue over time causing shortness of breath), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). During a review of Resident 85's Care Plan (CP), dated 8/21/24, the CP indicated, [Resident 85] has pulmonary fibrosis .oxygen therapy as ordered. During a review of Resident 85's Minimum Data Sets (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 8/27/24, the MDS indicated Resident 85 had no memory impairment and needed O2 therapy. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the residents with a safe and comfortable environment free of accident hazards when four out of ten residents' bathroom faucets had water temperatures above 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F, scale for measuring temperature). This failure could potentially place residents at risk of accidental scalds or burns from hot water. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/30/24 at 8:56 a.m. with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 6 in Resident 1's bathroom, CNA 6 confirmed the faucet water temperature to be 120.2 F. Resident 1 stated, The water is always very hot, and at times I am scared the water might burn or scald me . During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/30/24 at 11:02 a.m. with Housekeeper (HK) 1 in Resident 22 and 7's bathroom, HK 1 confirmed the faucet temperature to be 122.2 F. HK 1 stated that the water was very hot and could burn or scald the resident's skin since they were fragile. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/30/24 at 11:11 a.m. with CNA 7 in Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences were accommodated for four of 25 sampled residents (Resident 51, Resident 60, Resident 82, and Resident 20), when the residents' meal choices were not served. This failure increased the potential risk for the residents not attaining their highest practicable mental, physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 51 was admitted in late 2020 and readmitted in the middle of 2021 with diagnoses which included malnutrition, adult failure to thrive (condition where the individual's organs specifically the digestive tract are not absorbing required nutrients), and swallowing difficulty. During a review of Resident 51's care plan (CP), dated 9/2/24, the CP indicated, At risk for Altered Nutritional Status, Malnutrition - 9/2/22, revised 7/4/24 - Food preferences to be honored; Baseline food preferences - 10/26/22, revised 7/7/24 - Food preferences to be honored at time of service. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the antibiotic stewardship guidelines were followed for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 12), when Resident 12 received an antibiotic with no end date. This failure resulted in inappropriate or unnecessary use of antibiotic treatment for the resident. Findings: Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in the Spring of 2012 with a diagnosis that included diabetes (abnormal blood sugar levels), kidney disease, and urinary tract infection (UTI). During a review of Resident 12's Physician Orders (PO), dated 12/11/22, the PO indicated, [Brand Name] Capsule 250 MG (Cephalexin) Give 250 mg [milligram, unit of weight] by mouth one time a day for UTI .CEPHALEXIN 250 MG CAPSULE - TAKE 1 CAPSULE BY MOUTH ONCE DAILY (NO STOP DATE .INDEFINITE). There was no documented evidence an order of monitoring for signs and symptoms of UTI. During a review of Resident 12's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 8/14/24, the MDS indicated Resident 12 had no memory impairment. During an interview on 10/1/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) from verbal abuse when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) used profanity while Resident 1 asked for assistance. This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling intimidated and verbally abused at the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility in early 2023 with multiple diagnoses including depression, cerebral infarction (also known as a stroke - damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area), benign prostatic hyperplasia (also known as enlarged prostate) with lower urinary tract, complications of amputation of the left leg above the knee, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, contracture of left hand, and abnormal posture. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) Cognitive Patterns, dated 6/20/24, indicated he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS-a tool to assess cognition) of 15 out of 15, which indicated he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1's) rights were exercised safely when the resident self-administered medications without being evaluated or monitored by the health professionals. This failure resulted in Resident 1 taking multiple non-prescription supplements and vitamins, taking duplicate medications and increased the potential for adverse effects, medication errors, and ineffective medication therapy. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record, admission Record, indicated the resident was a long term resident in the facility with diagnoses that included chronic inflammation disorder affecting nerves (disorder that leads to loss of strength or sensation), diabetes (a serious condition where your blood sugar level is too high), pain and hallucinations. In a concurrent observation and interview on 6/20/24 starting at 11:19 a.m. in Resident 1's room, with Licensed Nurse (LN 1) present, multiple bottles of vitamins and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate monitoring and supervision for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3), when Resident 3 eloped (leaving unsupervised and undetected) from the facility. This failure had the potential to cause harm to Resident 3. Findings: Resident 3 was admitted in the Fall of 2023 with diagnoses which included Metabolic encephalopathy (a chemical imbalance caused by an illness that damages the brain), alcohol abuse with withdrawal delirium (a serious change in mental abilities), hypertension (high blood pressure), homelessness, and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 3's Face Sheet (identification sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 3's family member was the responsible party (RP, person responsible for the patient). During a review of Resident 3's Progress Notes Nurses Notes (PN), dated 10/28/23, at 11:02 a.m., the PN indicated, [Nurse] from [Name of Hospital] called stating pt [patient] was brought in by ER [Emergency room] staff stating pt fell off his bike. She is calling to clarify…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety measures were in place for one out of five sampled residents (Resident 4), who was at risk for falling. This failure had the potential to cause physical injury. Findings: A review of Resident 4's admission Record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in October 2018 with diagnoses including frequent falls and unspecified dementia (loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning) and difficultly walking. A review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and screening tool), dated 8/2/23, indicated Resident 4 required one-person physical assistance from staff for transfers between surfaces (e.g. moving from the bed to a wheelchair or from the bed to a chair). The MDS further indicated Resident 4 used a wheelchair in the facility. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/3/23 at 12:49 p.m. in Resident 4's room, Resident 4 was seen with Licensed Nurse (LN 1). Resident 4 was observed leaning on her right side facing her transfer pole…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to medicate Resident 5 with her scheduled fentanyl (opioid pain medication) patch. This failure had the potential to increase pain during end-of-life care. A review of a facility document titled, admission RECORD, indicated Resident 5 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's (problems with memory, thinking and behavior). Resident had a hospice (agency that assists with end-of-life care) provider. During a telephone interview on 10/3/23 at 9:38 a.m. with Resident 5's Responsible Party (RP), RP stated she went to visit Resident 5 around 9/22 and noticed the resident was grabbing her stomach and was moving around in bed. RP stated Resident 5 appeared in pain. A review of a facility document titled, Medication Administration Record, indicated on 9/19/23 and 9/22/23, the scheduled dose of fentanyl 72 hour, 25mcg (mcg= microgram, unit of measurement) patch was not given. A review of a facility document titled, Medication Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident call light system was accessible for two out of five residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3). This failure increased the risk of residents being unable to obtain assistance when needed. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted in December 2021 with diagnoses that included dementia (inability to think or do daily tasks) and muscle weakness. A review of Reident 3's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 3 was admitted in October 2022 with diagnoses that included dementia and muscle wasting. In a concurrent observation and interview, on 10/3/23 at 11:46 a.m., Resident 1 was sitting in a wheelchair on the left side of his bed with a beside table in front of him. Certified Nurse Assistant 1 (CNA 1) stated Resident 1's call device was not in reach of the Resident and was on the opposite of the bed where Resident 1 was sitting. In a concurrent observation and interview, on 10/3/2023 at 11:50 a.m., Resident 3 was observed laying in bed. CNA 1 confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 1) of a census of 97 was free from abuse, when Resident 2 intentionally grabbed Resident 1's shirt. This failure increased the potential to negatively impact Resident 1's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 2's progress note, dated 8/7/23, indicated around 10:30 in the morning, Resident 2 was observed by staff rolling down the hallway beside the nursing station in his wheelchair. Resident 1 was seated when Resident 2 made a stop and grabbed him by the front of his shirt. Resident 2 verbalized he was tired of Resident 1 and his behaviors. Resident 2 could not sleep because Resident 1 kept coughing all night and his television (TV) volume was up until midnight. Resident 2 felt his personal space wasn't being respected because Reisdent 1 would bring his stuff into his side of the room. A review of an admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure records of disposition and effective storage of destroyed controlled medications (regulated substances or drugs) were maintained when: 1. Random controlled medication audits did not reconcile for two out of five residents (Resident 3 and Resident 27); and 2. Multiple vials containing crushed and partially crushed medications, including narcotics, were found to be retrievable in four medications carts. These failures resulted in the facility not having accurate accountability of controlled substances and increased the potential for drug diversion and accidental exposure to destroyed medications. Findings: 1a. Resident 3 was admitted in early 2021 with diagnoses which included chronic pancreatitis (inflammation of pancreas) and chronic pain syndrome. During a review of Resident 3's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 8/23/22, the OSR indicated, [Brand name, (hydrocodone-acetaminophen, controlled pain medication)] 10-325 milligram [mg, a unit of measure] 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure the medication error rate of 5 percent or below was maintained for a census of 93, when two medication errors were observed during medication pass. This failure resulted in medication error rate of 5.41%. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 1/30/23, at 8:09 a.m., with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), LN 1 was observed preparing 8 medications for Resident 66. During a review of Resident 66's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 12/20/22, the OSR indicated, [Brand Name, diltiazem, blood pressure medication] Extended Release 24 Hour 180 milligram (mg, a unit of measurement) 1 tablet by mouth one time a day at 0800 [8 a.m.] .Hold if SBP (Systolic Blood Pressure, a measurement that indicates how much pressure blood is exerting against artery walls when the heart beats) is below 160. During a review of Resident 66's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for January 2023, the MAR indicated, LN 1 administered [diltiazem] to Resident 66 on 1/30/23, with a documented SBP of 130. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 66) was free of a significant medication error, when the resident received a blood pressure medication twenty-nine times, below the hold parameter as ordered. This failure had the potential risk for harm to Resident 66. Findings: Resident 66 was admitted in late 2022 with diagnoses which included high blood pressure. During a review of Resident 66's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 12/20/22, for [Brand Name, diltiazem (blood pressure medication)] 180 milligram (mg, a unit of measurement) 1 tablet by mouth one time a day at 0800 (8 a.m.) .Hold if SBP (Systolic Blood Pressure, a measurement that indicates how much pressure blood is exerting against artery walls when the heart beats) is below 160. During a review of Resident 66's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the months of December 2022 and January 2023, the MAR indicated nursing staff administered [diltiazem] with a SBPs below the hold parameter of 160, on the following dates: 12/21/22, 12/24/22, 12/25/22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with current guidelines and principles in a census of 93, when: 1. Two bottles of expired medications were available for resident use; and 2. Ten opened inhalers were not labeled with an open and discard date. These failures had a potential for residents to receive unsafe medications. Findings: 1. During an observation on 1/30/23, at 11:05 a.m., in the central supply medication room, with the Director of Central Supply (DSC), the DSC identified two bottles of simethicone (a medication to relieve gas), dated 12/2022. The DSC verified both bottles were expired and indicated the bottles should have been removed from the facility's drug supply. During an interview on 1/30/23, at 11:04 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON confirmed the expired simethicone should have been pulled out from the inventory. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Storage of Medication, revised 10/22, the P&P indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan (BCP), for two of 25 sampled residents (Resident 185 and Resident 187), was completed and provided to the resident or the resident's responsible party (RP). This failure had the potential to leave the residents and the responsible parties without information summarizing the goals, medications, treatments, diet, and discharge plans. Findings: 1. Resident 185 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a neck fracture. During a review of Resident 185's electronic medical record on 1/30/23, the medical record indicated the BCP was not completed and was in progress. During a review of Resident 185's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 1/30/23, the OSR indicated, [Neck] Collar on at all times every shift. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/30/23, at 9:12 a.m., Resident 185 was laying in bed, awake and alert and verbally responsive, with a neck collar in place. Resident 185 stated, I hurt my…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a plan of care for two of 25 sampled residents (Resident 56 and Resident 185), when: 1. Resident 56 had no care plan developed for respiratory failure and the use of oxygen (O2); and 2. Resident 185 had no care plan developed and implemented for the use of a neck collar. These failures had the potential to result in the residents not attaining their highest practicable well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 56 was admitted in late 2022 and re-admitted in early 2023 with diagnoses which included respiratory failure. During a review of Resident 56's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 1/17/23, the OSR indicated, Maintain O2 Sats [oxygen saturation, measure of blood oxygen content] above 90%; Oxygen - @ [at] 2 Liters/Min [minute] Via Nasal Cannula [NC] every shift. During a review of Resident 56's OSR, dated 1/26/23, the OSR indicated, Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution [medication for lung infection and asthma] .3 ml [milliliter, volume measurement] inhale orally every 6 hours as needed for SOB…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 28) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, when a fall mat was not in place as ordered by the physician. This failure increased the potential for injury. Findings: Resident 28 was admitted to the facility in the spring of 2017 with multiple diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss), muscle weakness and inability to communicate. During a review of Resident 28's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 11/29/22, the MDS indicated Resident 28 had severely impaired memory and required total assistance from two persons for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). During a review of Resident 28's Nursing Care Plan (NCP) titled, Fall .[Resident 28] is at risk for falls r/t [related to] weakness, Alzheimer's disease [progressive memory loss and thinking skills], HTN [hypertension, raised blood pressure] hx [history] of falls, major depressive disorder, dementia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate intervention was implemented for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 28), when Resident 28's plan of care, to turn and reposition every two hours and as needed to prevent wound progression, was not followed. This failure resulted in Resident 28's coccyx (tailbone) pressure wound progressing from Stage 2 (shallow open or break in the top two layers of the skin) to a Stage 4 (deep wound that may impact the muscle, tendons, ligaments and bone). Findings: Resident 28 was admitted in the middle of 2017 with diagnoses which included dementia (memory impairment), morbid obesity, and diabetes mellitus (abnormality of blood sugar levels). During a review of Resident 28's Nursing Care Plan, revised 5/31/17, the NCP indicated, [Resident 28] is at risk for altered skin integrity related to decreased/impaired mobility, incontinent of bowel and bladder, diabetes mellitus type 2, episodes of resistive to care, advanced age with thin and fragile skin, history of pressure injuries/skin impairment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 25 sampled residents (Residents 27) was free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications when Resident 27 received as-needed lorazepam (a psychotropic medication for anxiety) without prescriber-documented rationale and specified duration for extended use beyond 14 days. This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary use of medication. Findings: On 2/1/23, a review of Resident 27's medical record indicated she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder and anxiety. Resident 27 had a physician's order, dated 1/6/23, for lorazepam 0.5 milligram (mg, a measurement), 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for generalized anxiety disorder manifested by verbalization of anxiousness. This order exceeded 14 days. On 2/1/23, a review of Resident 27's medical record indicated there was no documented evidence to show the physician documented the rationale why the resident needed the lorazepam…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe food storage and preparation, as well as maintain kitchen equipment and utensils in accordance with professional standards for food safety for a census of 93, when: 1. Five bags of frozen chicken breasts covered with ice crystals were found in the freezer; 2. A cutting board and can opener were found with rough surfaces which interfere with sanitization; and 3. Clean forks were touched on the eating surface by ungloved hands after being cleaned, sanitized, and dried. These failures increased the potential for food-borne illnesses. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview within the initial kitchen tour on 1/30/23, at 8:09 a.m., with the Registered Dietitian (RD), five bags of frozen chicken breast were found in the freezer covered in ice crystals. The RD stated, These should be tossed out. I don't want to compromise the health of the residents. During a review of the facility's policy and procedures (P&P), titled, Procedure for refrigerated storage, dated 2018, the P&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 2.9 | +2.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUDSON RIVER OPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/05/2021 |
| BAY BRIDGE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 08/15/2014 |
| CHEEMA, CHANDANDEEP | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/25/2021 |
| LARSEN, JORIN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $959K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555219. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.