No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rock Creek Care Center

260 Racetrack Street, Auburn, CA 95603 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 84 certified beds · (530) 885-7051 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (530) 885-7051 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
275 Grass Valley Hwy · (530) 885-0344 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
815 Lincoln Way · (530) 885-6524 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
631 Auburn Folsom Rd · (530) 823-5550 · Call to confirm hours
Park
123 Recreation Dr · (530) 885-8461 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.6%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.6%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.5%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.5%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.9%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.0%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.9%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.3%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.6%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.5%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.2%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.982.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.591.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 157 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
98.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.45U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 98.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 106 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.2%CMS range 54.8–69.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.0%CMS range 6.6–12.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge98.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge99.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge90.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 4.2–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
1.15
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.39
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.08
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
46.7%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 79.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.547 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-23)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the transfer and discharge was appropriate for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when the resident was not provided with the required discharge notices when transferred to the hospital and was not permitted to return to the facility.This failure resulted in Resident 1's unnecessary admission in the hospital with no information on resident rights or how to file an appeal to remain in the skilled nursing facility (SNF), and had the potential risk of not attaining Resident 1's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in March 2026 with diagnoses which included unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction (long-term complications that persist after a stroke which include cognitive challenges and emotional changes) and anxiety disorder (persistent, excessive fear or worry that interferes with daily life, functioning, and relationships).A review of the facility's Bed Hold Policy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to store cookware pans and utensils in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when:2 steam table pans were found wet while stored away2 spatulas, 1 whisk were found wet while stored in the dry storage area1 steam table lid was found with dried food debris at the dry storage area1 gray scoop, and 1green serving spoon found with dry food debris in the dry storage area.These failures had potential to cause food-borne illnesses in a highly susceptible population of 80 residents who received food from the kitchen.Findings:During a concurrent initial tour observation and interview on 1/20/26 at 9 a.m. at the kitchen with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), two wet steam tables pans, and several cooking utensils were stacked wet. Additionally, there were cooking utensils found to have dried food debris stored at the clean and ready-to-use storage areas. The following were the findings during the initial visit:2 steam table pans wet at dry storage area2 spatulas, 1 whisk were found…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were provided to one of 19 sampled residents when Resident 82 was not provided with a shower for a week.This failure had the potential to further negatively impact Resident 82's psychosocial well-being and carried a risk for skin breakdown, leading to infection.A review of Resident 82's admission Record indicated Resident 82 is a [AGE] year old female who was admitted in January of 2026 with multiple diagnoses including radiculopathy (a pinch nerve in the spine causing symptoms like pain, numbness, tingling, or weakness that can radiate from the back into the arms or legs), difficulty walking and muscle weakness.A review of Resident 82's Minimum Data Set (MDS- federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 1/17/26, indicated Resident 82 had no cognitive impairment.A review of Resident 82's Care Plan dated 1/14/26 titled Skin, indicated, . [Resident 82] is at risk for skin breakdown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely store food for a census of 84 residents, when unlabeled and expired food items were stored in the facility ' s kitchen. This failure had the potential to lead to foodborne illness among residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/1/25 at 11:10 a.m. with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) in the kitchen walk-in refrigerator and freezer units, DSS confirmed the following unlabeled and expired food items were stored: In the walk-in refrigerator: 1. A storage container of cooked tomato sauce with expiration date 3/26/25; 2. A storage container of fresh parsley with expiration date 3/23/25; 3. Three five pounds bags of raw chicken pieces with expiration date 2/27/25; 4. Three unlabeled meat packages of five pounds chubs of raw hamburger; 5. An unlabeled package of shredded red cabbage; and 6. Two packages of fresh spinach with expiration dates of 3/29/25 and 3/31/25. In the freezer: - One opened, unsealed, unlabeled, and undated package of veggie burgers. DSS stated she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the menu was being following for the therapeutic diet for lunch on 10/9/24 when: 1.Three residents (Resident 30, 49, and 64) were on modified texture diets, Dysphagia Mechanical (diet is for people with mild to moderate chewing and/or swallowing difficulty) and Pureed (diet is for people with trouble chewing, swallowing, or fully breaking down food and usually ground, pressed, or strained to pudding like consistency) who received no wheat roll for bread instead of receiving pureed roll (for Pureed diet) or chopped and milk-soaked wheat roll (for Dysphagia Mechanical diet) as indicated on the menu; 2. Two residents (Resident 18 and 23) with NCS (No Concentrated Sweets)/CCHO (Consistent or Controlled Carbohydrate) diet (diet is for people that need to control their blood sugar or diabetes) received wheat roll for bread instead of no roll as indicated on the menu; 3. Two residents (Resident 15 and 39) with 60 grams (g) Protein Renal diet (diet is for people to manage chronic kidney disease) received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. Several various metal sheet pans in clean and ready-to-use storage areas: a. Were stacked wet while stored away b. Had food debris; 2. There were opened bags of food items in dry storage and freezer with issues: a. One opened bag of elbow noodles was not tightly closed b. One opened bag of croutons was not labeled with an open or use by date c. One opened package of hamburger meat patties was not labeled with an open or use by date; 3. The thawing process system did not effectively identify when food was pulled from the freezer and used by date; 4. The ice machine was not clean; 5. The hot food cool down was not practiced correctly; 6. Two dietary aides were not able to verbalize the process of manual dishwashing by using the 3-compartment sinks correctly; 7. One dietary aide was not able to verbalize the concentration of the sanitizer solution for the sanitation (red) bucket (a color…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two food service personnel were able to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services when: 1. Dietary Aides (DA) 1 and DA 2, were unable verbalized the process of manual dishwashing by using three-compartment sinks correctly (cross refer to F812, #6), and 2. DA 2 was unable to verbalize the concentration of sanitizer solution for the sanitation (red) bucket (a red color-coded bucket with sanitizer solution for food service staff to sanitize food contact surfaces) (cross refer to F812, #7). These failures had the potential to place 75 out of 75 highly susceptible residents who received food from the kitchen at risk for food-borne illness. Findings: 1. During an interview on 10/8/24, at 11 a.m. with DA 1, DA 1 verbalized the process of manual dishwashing by using the three-compartment sink. She was not able to verbalize the immersion time of the dishes for the sanitizing step with the sanitizer. DA 2 joined the interview and stated the immersion time should be 20 seconds. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident needs were accommodated for two of 25 sampled residents (Resident 17 and Resident 25), when the call light was not within reach. This failure had the potential to result in the residents not attaining their highest practicable physical, psychosocial, and emotional well-being. Findings: A review of an admission Record indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in late 2024 with multiple diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a brain disease marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements) and muscle weakness. A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 8/28/24, indicated Resident 17 had severely impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS indicated that Resident 17 required a helper to lift trunk or limbs during activities of daily living (ADLs- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate assessment was performed for one resident (Resident 22) of 25 sampled residents when Resident 22's dental/oral assessment was inaccurate. This failure resulted in Resident 22 not receiving care reflective of the residents' status and needs. Findings: A review of Resident 22's admission RECORD indicated an admission date to the facility of 4/4/24 with multiple diagnoses which included adult failure to thrive (significant weight loss, functional decline, and an inability to maintain adequte nutrition and physical health), and malnutrition. Resident 22's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment tool) dated 4/10/24, indicated no memory problem. During an observation on 10/9/24 at 10:25 a.m., in Resident 22's room, Resident 22 was observed with all teeth missing. During an interview on 10/10/24 at 3:31 p.m., Resident 22 stated she has no teeth at all, both top and bottom. During an interview on 10/10/24, at 3:45 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff had the necessary competencies and skill sets to meet the care and services for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 378) when one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) transferred Resident 378 by herself using a Hoyer lift (an electronically operated mechanical lift used to transfer a patient from place to place). This failure had the potential for Resident 378 to receive unsafe care. Findings: Review of Resident 378's admission Record, indicated, Resident 378 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included fracture of upper end of right leg, muscle weakness, abnormalities in gait and mobility, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (paralysis and weakness on one side of the body after stroke.) During a review of Resident 378's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 10/7/24, the MDS indicated, Resident 378 needed the assistance of two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 379) when the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 2) did not wear the proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE-gown, eye protection or face shield and gloves) upon entering Resident 379's room with an isolation precaution sign. This failure put the residents at increased risk for the spread of infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 379's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 379 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but is not limited to COVID-19 (a highly contagious respiratory disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 379's Result Details, dated 10/2/24, the Result Details indicated a positive result for COVID-19. During a review of Resident 379's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 10/10/24, the OSR indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food that was palatable when three of seven sampled residents (Resident 3, Resident 4, and Resident 7) had food that was served cold. This failure had the potential for Resident 3, Resident 4, and Resident 7 to experience dissatisfaction with meals leading to decreased intake with possible weight loss. Findings: A review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with multiple diagnoses including hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke- lack of blood flow to the brain) and moderate protein calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of protein, calories, and nutrients). A review of Resident 3's MDS (Minimum Data Set- a federally mandated assessement tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 9/18/24, indicated Resident 3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess cognition) score of 13 out of 15 that indicated Resident 3 was cognitively intact. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident needs were accommodated for one of six sampled residents (Resident 3), when Resident 3's call light was not within reach. The failure had the potential to result in the resident not attaining her highest practicable physical, psychosocial, and emotional well-being. Findings: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with multiple diagnoses that included osteoarthritis (deterioration of tissue that lines the joints) and muscle weakness. A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, and assessment tool), dated 6/11/23, indicated Resident 3 had moderately impaired cognition. During an interview on 7/3/24, at 11 a.m., with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated that her roommate, Resident 3 was unable to push the call light. Resident 2 further stated that she had to push the call light for Resident 3 on multiple occasions. Resident 2 further stated that Resident 3 also had to call out for help when she is unable to push the call light. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/3/24, at 11:15 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders to ensure professional standards of quality were maintained for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1's surgical staples were not removed on the date ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to cause an infection in Resident 1's wound. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with multiple diagnoses that included a fracture of the right lower leg and rhabdomyolysis (a breakdown of muscle tissue). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, and assessment tool), dated 4/24/24, indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. During a review of Resident 1's admission Summary Note dated 4/18/24, the admission Summary Note indicated, .Skin/Head to toe assessment .laceration to right side of forehead, 5 staples in place (Remove in 10-14 days, 4/24-4/28) . During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary dated 4/18/24, the Order Summary indicated, Laceration upper right forehead- 5 staples in place (Remove in 10-14 days, 4/24-4/28). During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were maintained for one of six sampled residents (Resident 2), when Resident 2 did not receive chlordiazepoxide (a medication used to treat alcohol withdrawal symptoms) according to physician orders. This failure resulted in Resident 2 to have experienced uncomfortable symptoms and had the potential to cause Resident 2 to relapse during alcohol detoxification. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility June 2024 with multiple diagnoses that included fibromyalgia (a chronic condition involving widespread body pain and tiredness) and alcohol abuse. A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 6/28/24, indicated Resident 2 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 7/3/24 at 11 a.m. with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated that chlordiazepoxide was ordered when she was admitted to the facility. Resident 2 further stated that she did not receive the medication until three days later. Resident 2 further stated, It was not cool; I had a concern there. I needed it (chlordiazepoxide)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards for food service safety when ready to use dishware was found dirty and in uncleanable condition. These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses (an illness caused by food or water contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites or toxins) to all residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/27/24 at 10:55 a.m. with the Activities Assistant (AA) in the main dining room, eight residents with beverage mugs were in the dining room playing a game and there was a cart with urns of coffee and mugs available for residents to use. The AA confirmed three of the mugs available for residents to use had brown and white residue stuck to the inside of the mugs. The AA stated the mugs were not clean, should not be used for residents, and she would take them back to the kitchen to be cleaned. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/27/24 at 10:59 a.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) in the kitchen, the CDM stated clean, ready to use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services were provided to two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when the Restorative Nursing Assistant program (RNA program: provides residents with exercises to improve or maintain mobility and strength) services were not implemented per the physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 1 and Resident 2 experiencing declines in range of motion and strength. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in September of 2023 with diagnoses which included muscular dystrophy (weakness and loss of muscle mass) and multiple sclerosis (causes muscle stiffness and weakness). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS: an assessment tool), dated 3/28/24, indicated Resident 1 had moderate memory impairment and had no rejection of care behaviors. An interview on 6/27/24 at 11:41 a.m., Resident 1 stated he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication storage policy and procedures were followed, in a census of 75, when medications requiring storage in the refrigerator were kept at temperatures lower than the recommended range. This failure had the potential risk to decrease the effectiveness of the medications stored in the refrigerator. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview of the medication room at maple station on 3/20/23, at 9:50 a.m., with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), LN 1 indicated the medication refrigerator, in which vaccines and antibiotics were stored, was observed to be at 32 degrees F (Fahrenheit, a unit of measuring temperature). During an observation and interview of the same medication room on 3/21/23, at 9:51 a.m., with LN 1, LN 1 indicated the medication refrigerator was observed to be at 34 degrees F (Fahrenheit, a unit of temperature). LN 1 acknowledged that the temperature in the refrigerator was out of the acceptable range (36-46 F). During an interview on 3/21/23, at 2 p.m., with Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the cooks utilized standardized recipes for food preparation to ensure the nutritive value and palatability of the meals served. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's nutritional status and not meet the residents' preferences. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/20/23, at 11 a.m., with [NAME] 1 (CK 1), CK 1 poured a cup of water into a container of mashed potato granules. CK 1 was observed adding mashed potato granules, black pepper, and dry basil and did not use measuring tools. CK 1 indicated she did not have a recipe for mashed potatoes. During an interview on 3/20/23, at 12:51 p.m., with CK 1, CK 1 was asked about the recipe for the turkey for resident's lunch that day and about the recipe for the pasta salad dated 3/18/23. CK 1 indicated she followed the instructions on the turkey's package and that the package had been thrown away .she did not remember the instructions for cooking the turkey and she did not follow any standardized recipe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and prevent hazards at specific points of food handling in a census of 75, when: 1. Kitchen staff did not wash their hands before handling food; and 2. Food trays were found wet and were used to serve food. These failures had the potential to put vulnerable residents receiving food from the kitchen, at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/20/23, beginning at 12:54 p.m., [NAME] 1 (CK 1) stood in the food line and scooped and used tongs to put food on plates for lunch. CK 1 then pulled up her pants with both hands, no gloves, and no hand washing after pulling up her pants. CK 1 returned to scooping foods with the ladle and using tongs to put food on the plates. CK 1 indicated that she should have washed her hands after touching her pants. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/21/23, at 8:00 a.m., while CK 1 was standing in the food line, CK 1 touched the top of her watch, then picked up a knife with the same hand and continued to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-23 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet of space per resident in rooms 1-8, 11, 12, 17-19, 21, and 23-36 for a census of 75. This failure increased the potential for inadequate personal space and the residents' ability to move freely in their rooms. Findings: During a review of the facility document addressed to the Department of Public Health dated 3/9/21, the facility document indicated the Administrator (ADM) requested a continuance of room size variance waiver to rooms 1-8, 11, 12, 17-19, 21, and 23-36. During observations and concurrent interviews on 3/20/23 which started at 8:10 a.m. through 10:30 a.m., the following rooms failed to meet the minimum space requirement for each resident: Room # Beds Actual Sq Ft 1 2 71.4 sq. ft./person 2 2 71.45 sq. ft./person 3 2 71.4 sq. ft./person 4 2 75.5 sq. ft./person 5 2 71.4 sq. ft./person 6 2 74.5 sq. ft./person 7 2 74.5 sq. ft./person 8 2 76.9 sq. ft./person 11 2 74.67 sq. ft./person 12 2 72.1 sq. ft./person…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free from pests for a census of 75, when rodent droppings were found, and scattered garbage and debris were found behind and between two garbage bins. This failure resulted in the presence of pests inside the facility and had the potential to result in the transmission of infection caused by rodents and pests. Findings: Resident 35 was admitted to the facility in the middle of 2019. During a review of Resident 35's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 1/12/23, the MDS indicated Resident 35 had no memory impairment. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in late 2021. During a review of Resident 9's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 9 had moderate memory impairment. During a review of the facility document titled, Service Request Log (SRL), the SRL indicated services for pest control were requested on 1/13/23, 2/8/23, and 3/8/23. During a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident needs and personal requests were accommodated for three of 24 sampled residents (Resident 27, Resident 14 and Resident 17), when: 1. An appropriate call light was not provided to Resident 27; 2. Wheelchair footrests were not provided to Resident 14; and 3. An appropriate adaptive equipment was not provided to Resident 17 according to physician's orders. These failures had the potential to result in the residents not attaining their highest practicable physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 27 was admitted to the facility in late 2020 with diagnoses which included quadriplegia (paralysis of bilateral upper and lower extremities). During a review of Resident 27's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 3/17/23, the MDS indicated Resident 27 had moderate memory impairment and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). During a review of Resident 27's assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure policy and procedures were followed in accordance with professional standards of practice when licensed nurses did not verify a pain medication's dosage strength on an order for Resident 9, in a census of 75. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 9's health, pain and comfort level. Findings: During a medication administration reconciliation of Resident 9's clinical record on 3/20/23, at 1:15 p.m., Order Summary Report (OSR) indicated an order dated 12/11/22 for Lidocaine Patch [a pain medication] Apply to affected site topically in the morning for x pain management . Apply 1 patch 12 hours on and 12 hours off. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/21/23, at 10:10 a.m., with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), LN 2 was not able to locate lidocaine patch's dosage strength .LN 2 stated the [lidocaine] patch dosage strength should be a percentage 4 or 5 .there is no dose on this order. During a record review of Resident 9's March 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) on 3/20/23, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement pharmaceutical services policies and processes related to reconciliation of narcotic medications (drugs that have potential for abuse or dependence) for Resident 20, in a census of 75. Findings: During a reconciliation audit of medication cart 2's narcotic drawer on 3/20/23, at 9:53 a.m., a random medication blister pack was selected for reconciliation accuracy. The random blister pack was for Resident 20's lacosamide (a medication given for seizures) 250 mg (milligram, a unit of measure), the number of pills in the blister packs did not match the count on the Controlled Drug Record (CDR). During a concurrent interview and record review with Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3), LN 3 confirmed Resident 20's medical record indicated a Physician Order, dated 1/9/23, for lacosamide 250 mg by mouth two times a day. A review of Resident 20's Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated a dose was last given on 3/20/23 at 8 a.m., however the CDR indicated last documented dose given was 3/19/23 at 8:19 p.m. LN 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 24) failed to receive the correct dose of a psychotropic medication (drug prescribed to affect the mind, emotions, or behavior), when Resident 24's new physician's order for aripiprazole (antipsychotic, a type of psychotropic medication to treat mental health conditions such as depression) Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) was not initiated as per physician's order. This failure had the potential for Resident 24 not attaining the desirable effect of the medication. Findings: Resident 24 was admitted to the facility in early of 2022 with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings) and major depressive disorder (the persistent feeling of sadness). During a review of Resident 24's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 3/18/23, the OSR indicated, Give aripiprazole 0.5 mg (milligram, a unit of measure) by mouth one time a day every other day for depression. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/22/23, at 9:45 a.m., with Licensed Nurse 4 (LN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 6.9 % error rate, when two medication errors out of 29 opportunities were observed during a medication pass for two residents (Residents 1 and Resident 9). This failure resulted in medications not being given in accordance with the prescriber's orders, which resulted in residents not receiving the intended therapeutic effect of the medications. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 3/20/22, at 8:24 a.m., with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), LN 1 prepared and administered seven medications for Resident 1, which included a folic acid tablet. During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 2/26/23, the OSR indicated, Folic acid Tablet 1 milligrams [mg, a unit of measurement], give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for supplement. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/23/23, at 9:38 a.m., with LN 1, LN 1 confirmed she gave Resident 1 folic acid 400 micrograms (mcg, a unit of measurement) with calcium (a supplement to prevent low blood calcium) 100 mg on 3/20/23. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 17) was provided with necessary adaptive equipment for meals, as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being and contribute to lower meal intake. Findings: Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in late 2021 with diagnoses which included heart failure, rheumatoid osteoarthritis (bone and joint pain), depression, and anxiety. During a review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 2/28/23, the MDS indicated Resident 17 had no memory impairment and required extensive assistance with bathing, toilet use, and other activities of daily living. During a review of Resident 17's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 10/11/22, the OSR indicated, Built-up utensils [adaptive utensils that have larger handles that help people with grasping difficulties eat meals more independently] with all meals. During a review of Resident 17's Nursing Care Plan (NCP), dated 3/15/23, the NCP indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the outside garbage dumpster area was clean and litter free for a census of 75. This failure had the potential to attract rodents that carry diseases and create an unsanitary environment for facility residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/20/23, at 9 a.m., with the Assistant Dietary Supervisor (ADS), two dumpsters in the back of the building for kitchen and facility use, revealed trash on the ground surrounding the dumpsters included plastic bottles, plastic cups, soda cans, disposable gloves, disposable utensils, food fragments, and a plastic bag containing incontinence briefs. The ADS indicated the garbage needed to be bagged better and scattered garbage could attract critters and pests .the expectation was for the dumpster area to be picked up, monitored, and made sure it's cleaned .the scattered trash was not acceptable. During an interview with Registered Dietitian (RD), on 3/21/23, at 8:55 a.m., the RD indicated pests could be attracted to garbage and garbage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the walk-in freezer in safe operating condition in a census of 75, when the walk-in freezer had ice buildup and a damaged gasket (a rubber seal that keeps the door tight to maintain the temperature). This failure had the potential to cause the freezer to not operate efficiently, which would result in thawing and possible contamination of food. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with [NAME] 1 (CK 1), on 3/20/23, at 8:15 a.m., the walk-in freezer revealed ice build-up on two separate shelves, on the floor, and around the door frame. The gasket on the door frame was damaged and missing in multiple areas. CK 1 indicated she did not know how long the gasket had been damaged, and stated, The [Certified Dietary Manager, CDM] usually does that .gasket was fairly new. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/20/23, at 9:05 a.m., with the Assistant Dietary Supervisor (ADS), the ADS confirmed the ice build-up, and stated, There is a seal problem, gasket needs to be replaced. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 9), when a mouse trap with mouse droppings were found in the resident's room. This failure resulted in Resident 9's decreased sense of emotional well-being and had the potential for the transmission of diseases. Findings: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in late 2021. During a review of Resident 9's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 3/17/23, the MDS indicated Resident 9 had moderate memory impairment. During a review of the facility document titled, [Pest Control Service Provider] (PCSD), dated 3/8/23, the PCSD indicated, Performed exterior rodent service. Checked accessible bait stations and replaced bait as needed .Performed interior rodent service, checked and reset all traps. Placed glueboards [traps for mice and rats] on each side of doors in six rooms closest to bathroom due to patient stating she saw a mouse. During a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet of space per resident in rooms 1-8, 11, 12, 17, 18, 19, 21, and 23-36. This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide adequate personal space for the residents in these rooms for a census of 77. Findings: During concurrent observations and interviews conducted on 1/20/26 beginning at 3:32 p.m., room numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12 and 24 were observed to be uncluttered with sufficient space for the personal effects of residents. There was enough room for entrance, egress (going out), and maneuvering of equipment in and out of the rooms and access to the bathrooms. There were no validated issues or safety concerns regarding lack of space for the delivery of care verbalized by any of the residents in these rooms.During an interview on 1/21/26 at 9:05 a.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1), CNA 1 indicated that she has enough space in the facility rooms to perform resident care, maneuver, and transfer residents. During an interview on 1/23/26 at 9:25 a.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 28 multiple-resident rooms (rooms 1-8, 11, 12, 17-19, 21, 23-36) met the required 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident when the following rooms were measured as: room [ROOM NUMBER] at 71.4 sq. ft. per person room [ROOM NUMBER] at 71.45 sq. ft. per person room [ROOM NUMBER] at 71.4 sq. ft. per person room [ROOM NUMBER] at 75.5 sq. ft. per person room [ROOM NUMBER] at 71.4 sq. ft. per person room [ROOM NUMBER] at 74.5 sq. ft. per person room [ROOM NUMBER] at 74.5 sq. ft. per person room [ROOM NUMBER] at 76.9 sq. ft. per person room [ROOM NUMBER] at 74.67 sq. ft. per person room [ROOM NUMBER] at 72.1 sq. ft. per person room [ROOM NUMBER] at 74.67 sq. ft. per person room [ROOM NUMBER] at 73.83 sq. ft. per person room [ROOM NUMBER] at 78.93 sq. ft. per person room [ROOM NUMBER] at 70.47 sq. ft. per person room [ROOM NUMBER] at 70.8 sq. ft. per person room [ROOM NUMBER] at 71.4 sq. ft. per person room [ROOM NUMBER] at 70.47 sq. ft. per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 52.9+2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HUDSON RIVER OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/05/2021
BAY BRIDGE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/05/2021
ZAIDI, FARAZIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/18/2023
DRAPER, BLAKEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2022
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$696K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 12%Medicare 15%Other / private 73%

This home reported $696K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$462per resident / day
operating cost
$14,058per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$482per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055446. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next