San Joaquin Nursing Center And Rehabilitation Cent
3601 San Dimas, Bakersfield, CA 93301 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (661) 323-2894 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Apr 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $47,242 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-23)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.3% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.9% | 7.3% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 0.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.8% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 0.7% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 10.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.78 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.55 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 200 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 52% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.0%CMS range 44.2–58.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 7.3–12.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 44.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 5.7–11.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.54 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 92.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.28 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.39 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
62 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Prevention of Pressure Injuries (PI -localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction), Wound Care, and admission Assessment and Follow Up: Role of the Nurse, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the physician was not notified and treatment orders obtained, a care plan was not developed and implemented, wound measurements were not completed, and an individualized turning/repositioning schedule was not determined, when the resident was admitted with a coccyx (tailbone) PI. These failures resulted in Resident 1 not being provided wound care for nine days and the worsening of Resident 1's pressure injury.Finding:During a review of Resident 1's Admission/readmission Evaluation/Assessment (AREA), (AREA - document used by the facility when a resident is admitted /readmitted to document the assessment including skin assessment) dated 5/7/25 (admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-24 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was discharged home safely when Resident 1 needed assistance with personal care but was sent home alone without a caregiver or family member in an unsafe living condition and without discharge instructions. This failure resulted in Resident 1 being admitted to the hospital for 12 days with diagnoses of failure to thrive (a state of decline that is multifactorial and may be caused by chronic concurrent diseases and functional impairments), pulmonary edema (too much fluid in the lungs), elevated troponin (type of protein found in the muscles of the heart - indicator for impending heart attack) after only six hours from being discharged from the skilled nursing facility (SNF) and 12 days later, was referred to hospice care (end of life care). Findings: During an interview on 7/25/23 at 10:10 a.m. with Case Manager (CM), CM stated Resident 1 was brought to the emergency room because he passed out on his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in a sanitary manner when: 1. Sheet pans and dry storage bins were stored upside down while wet, with food debris and sticky residue adhered to their surfaces. 2. A dirty dining cart was stored in the walk-in refrigerator, not cleaned and disinfected. 3. Label on a container used to store garlic bread in the walk-in refrigerator had the wrong use-by date. 4. A (Brand) floor mixer had black residue buildup underneath the splash guard and splashes of light brown residue in mixing bowl. 5. A commercial can opener had black residue buildup on the cutting blade. 6. A meal slip (paper ticket that goes onto residents' food tray to ensure the correct food is served based on their needs and preferences) fell and the corner of the slip touched the edge of the gravy pan. 7. Fruit salad was left at room temperature for 37 minutes, then returned to its original container and refrigerated. The temperature of the fruit salad was 43 degrees Fahrenheit (43 F). These failures posed the risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards for three of 18 sampled residents (Resident 1, 106 and 121) and two unsampled residents (Resident 70 and 118) when: 1.Registered Nurse (RN) 1 did not verify identity before giving intravenous medication (IV, medication administered directly into the vein), did not label IV medication and tubing to Resident 121. This failure had the potential to cause harm to the resident.2.Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line, a long, thin flexible tube inserted into upper arm's vein and guided into a large vein above the heart, to administer medication) dressing was not changed for Resident 121. This failure had the potential to cause harm to the residents. 3.Resident 70's Medication Administration Record (MAR) was signed by LVN 5 without the medication being given. This failure placed Resident 70 at risk for seizures. 4. Resident 106 received the necessary respiratory (the process of breathing) care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices for two unsampled residents (Residents 22 and 128) when: 1.CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) 1 did not perform hand hygiene and wore a gown while providing care to Resident 22 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, infection control intervention designed to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organism, MDROs - a germ that is resistant to many antibiotics). 2.CNA 1 did not perform hand hygiene before and after repositioning Resident 128. 3. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not perform hand hygiene in accordance with facility policy and procedure and infection prevention and control guidelines for Clostridioides Difficile (C. difficile- contagious bacteria that causes diarrhea and inflammation of the colon). 4. LVN 1 used a medication tray in Resident 66's room who was on transmission-based precautions (a measure used to prevent the spread of a suspected or known infection) for C.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman (person who represents or protects the interest of another) was notified of resident transfer to the hospital for one of 18 residents (Resident 1) per Federal notification requirements. This failure had the potential to limit advocacy oversight and protection of Resident 1's rights during the transfer process. Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/12/26 at 9:08 a.m., with the MDS Coordinator (MDSC- a licensed nurse who manages the minimum data set [MDS]- a clinical assessment tool used to evaluate the health, functional status, and care needs of residents), the MDSC reviewed Resident 1's medical record. The MDSC stated Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] due to respiratory complications. The MDSC stated the record did not indicate the Ombudsman was notified of Resident 1's transfer to the hospital. During an interview on 3/12/26 at 9:26 a.m., with Social Services (SS), SS stated she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included anticoagulation therapy (use of blood thinning medications) for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 123). This failure had the potential to result in the lack of appropriate monitoring and increased the risk for bleeding complications for Resident 123. Findings:During review of Resident 123's admission Record (AR- a document that contains essential information about a resident), undated, the AR indicated Resident 123 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain due to blockage). During a review of Resident 123's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 3/6/26, the OSR indicated, .Rivaroxaban [blood thinner] 20 mg [milligrams- unit of measure] Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Atrial Fibrillation [irregular heartbeat]. The order included a black box warning (a serious safety warning given for drugs or drug…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan for Anticoagulant (medication that prevent or reduce the formation of blood clot) was reviewed and updated for one of five sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 3 not receiving care that is aligned with his current needs. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/12/2026 at 9:57 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), Resident 3's physician's orders and care plan was reviewed. Resident 3's care plan indicated, . [Resident 3] is on Anticoagulant therapy (apixaban) . DSD stated, I am not seeing an order [Apixaban brand - a blood thinner used to reduce the risk of stroke] . Resident does not take [Apixaban brand] . He [Resident 3] has a care plan for [Apixaban brand] . He should not have that care plan anymore. DSD stated a medication use care plan should have been resolved once the resident was not on the medication anymore. DSD stated an updated care plan allowed for the residents' care to be current and appropriate. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 106), received the necessary respiratory (the process of breathing) care (respiratory treatment/ therapy, oxygen therapy) and services with a current physician's order. This failure had a potential to result in respiratory complications for Resident 106.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/9/2026 at 2:10 pm. with Resident 106 in her room, Resident 106 was lying in bed with head elevated. Resident 106 had a nasal cannula (NC) connected to an oxygen concentrator (a medical device that pulls ambient air and delivers pure oxygen) @ 4L/min (Liters per minute - unit of measure). Resident 106 stated she had been on oxygen therapy due to shortness of breath. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/9/2026 at 3:45 pm. with Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) in Resident 106's room, RNA checked Resident 106's oxygen concentrator. RNA stated, It's [oxygen flow rate] at 4L/min. RNA stated Resident 106 had been on oxygen for some time. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document on the daily Census and Nursing Hour Posting the facility name, the total number and actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: registered nurses, licensed practical nurses or licensed vocational nurses, and certified nurse aides. This failure resulted in the public not knowing the correct number of staff working per shift.During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/11/2026 at 2:20 p.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), the Census and Nursing Hour Posting, dated Wednesday, March 11, 2026 was reviewed. The census did not have the name of the facility or the correct number of staff or staffing hours for AM (morning shift), PM (afternoon shift), and NOC (night shift) shifts posted. DSD stated, the facility name is not on the posting, also the correct number of staff and hours for each shift (AM, PM & NOC) is not correct.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 12 ointment medications in the treatment cart had pharmacy labels. This failure had the potential to result in the wrong medication ointment to be given to another resident.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/11/2026 at 3:11 p.m. with Treatment Licensed Nurse (TLN) by the nurses' station hallway was a treatment cart. The second drawer contained ointment medications in clear bags with resident labels (pharmacy label). There were two tubes without labels. One medication was collagenase (brand) ointment (medication that helps remove dead tissue from a wound) 250 u/gm (units per gram - unit of measure) and the other one silver sulfadiazine (medication used to prevent and treat infections) Cream USP 1% 50 gm (grams - unit of measure). TLN stated, It [medications] is for residents. I don't see a resident label. I don't know whose it is. TLN stated the residents' ointments should have been labeled with a resident label. TLN stated medications without resident label could be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one unsampled resident's (Resident 70), Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Lacosamide (medication used to treat seizures) on 3/8/2026 was accurate. This failure resulted to an inaccurate clinical record and placed Resident 70 at risk for seizures. Findings: During a concurrent observation, interview and record review on 3/11/2026 at 2:42 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 in the B-Wing Hallway, there was a medication cart with a locked drawer and on top of it was a Controlled Drug Record binder. Scheduled medications (medications with high potential for abuse and/or addiction) and antibiotics bubble packs (a form of tamper -evident packaging where an individual pushes individual sealed tablets though the foil to take the medication) were inside. There was a bubble pack of Lacosamide with nine tablets taken. The pharmacy label indicated one tablet to be taken twice a day (9am and 9pm). The record for Lacosamide was reviewed. The record indicated nine signatures for March 6th at 2100…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 50 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure environment was free of accident hazards when the pavement in the facility's designated smoking area had a gap that three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2 and Resident 3) reported causing their wheelchairs to get stuck. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for falls and accidents. Findings:During a concurrent observation of the facility's designated smoking area and interview on 1/15/26 at 9:15 a.m. with Resident 1 and Resident 2, there was a gap in the pavement in the smoking area. Resident 1, who was alert and oriented and was on a wheelchair, stated the gap catches your wheelchair potentially causing residents to fall from their wheelchairs. Resident 1 called the gap a speed bump. Resident 2, also alert and oriented and on a wheelchair, corroborated the statements of Resident 1.During a concurrent observation and interview with the Director of Maintenance (DM) at the smoking area on 1/15/26 at 9:45 a.m., DM measured the gap in the pavement and stated it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Referrals, Social Services, when the facility failed to schedule a follow-up surgeon's (a doctor who removes or repairs a part of the body by operating on the patient) appointment for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for a delay in follow-up care for Resident 1 after surgery (the branch of medical practice that treats injuries, diseases, and deformities by the physical removal, repair, or readjustment of organs and tissues, often involving cutting into the body). Findings:During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical Reports (HPR), dated 7/5/25, the HPR indicated, [Resident 1] who is direct transfer back after suffering a fall resulting in C5-6 fracture [broken neck bone] requiring discectomy [removal] and fusion [joining] as well as R V2 vertebral artery stenosis [artery blockage] at injury site.f/u [follow up] w/ [with] their surgeon in 2 weeks. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/27/25 at 9:41 a.m. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were kept clean and trimmed for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 developing infection and skin injury.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 8/18/25, the AR indicated, DIAGNOSIS. NEED FOR ASSISTANCE WITH PERSONAL CARE.During a review of Resident 1's SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations), dated 7/31/25, the SBAR indicated, Change in skin color or condition. Other relevant information: Resident (1) has history of picking at himself and scratching. Nurses noted old scratches over body. Bleeding noted. Resident (1) states he is itching.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated 5/15/25, the MDS indicated on section C (Cognitive Patterns), Resident 1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 10 (score of 8 - 12 indicates moderately impaired cognition). The MDS indicated on section GG (Functional Abilities), Resident 1 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) on Urinary Catheter (a tube placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder) Care for two of five sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when:1. The facility did not monitor placement of urinary catheter for Resident 1.2. The facility did not document urine output according to the plan of care for Resident 2.These failures had the potential for Resident 1 and Resident 2 developing UTI (Urinary Tract Infection - bladder infection).Findings:1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 7/10/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 is a [AGE] year-old male with a diagnosis of OBSTRUCTIVE AND REFLUX UROPATHY (blockage of flow of urine from the kidneys to the bladder and backward flow of urine from the bladder into the ureters and potentially back to the kidneys).During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 7/10/25, the OSR indicated, Suprapubic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure:A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 was wearing proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering one of nine sampled residents' (Resident 6) room on contact precautions (to use PPE before entering residents' room with residents known or suspected to be infected with germs that can be spread by direct contact). This failure had the potential to result in spread of infection to other residents, staff, and visitors.2. A Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) performed hand hygiene after removing used gloves during a suprapubic catheter (a tube that drains urine from the bladder through a small opening in the lower abdomen) care for one of five sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 3 developing urinary tract infection (bladder infection). Findings:1. During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (AR), dated 7/10/25, the AR indicated, Diagnosis. EXTENDED SPECTRUM BETA LACTAMASE (ESBL) RESISTANCE [bacteria that is resistant to common antibiotics…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Wound Care, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when wound care orders were not obtained and care plan interventions were not developed and implemented for Resident 1's right and left heel wounds. These failures resulted in Resident 1 not being provided wound care for nine days and had the potential for worsening of Resident 1's right and left heel wounds.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Admission/readmission Evaluation/Assessment, (AREA) dated 5/7/25, the AREA indicated, Reason for admission: Skilled needs, wound care, the AREA indicated Resident 1 required assistance with activities of daily living: bathing, dressing, toileting, and bed mobility. The AREA indicated, Resident 1 had a wound to the right heel and a closed blister to the left heel (no measurement or description documented of the wound to the right heel or the blister to the left heel).During a review of Resident 1's Baseline Care Plan (BCP - a foundational document in skilled nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2 ) when:1. A low air loss mattress (a specialized medical mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure injuries [PI - localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction] by providing a combination of air circulation and pressure redistribution) was improperly installed. This failure resulted in Resident 2 hitting his head.2. The wheelchair was not maintained and could not be properly cleaned and sanitized. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to be exposed the infection and bacteria.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set, (MDS - a comprehensive assessment tool to evaluate the functional capabilities and health needs of residents) dated 5/18/25, the MDS indicated, Resident 2's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status - standardized assessment tool used to evaluate the mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Wound treatments were completed as ordered by the physician for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3). 2. Weekly wound assessments were completed for two of three sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3). These failures had the potential for delayed wound healing, worsening of wounds, and infection for Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3. Findings: 1. a) During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 3/17/25, the OSR indicated, Cleanse Wounds to R [right] upper arm, R Forearm [the part of the arm between the elbow and the wrist] and R hand with Dakins [a diluted solution, often used for wound care]. then cut holes for suction and turn wound vac [vacuum] on Q [every] Mon [Monday], Wed [Wednesday], Fri [Friday] & [and] PRN [as needed]. start date 3/17/25. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/1/25 at 2:39 p.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), Resident 1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR), dated 3/2025 was reviewed. The TAR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolatedNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the hospital failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Background Screening Investigations when one of three sampled Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1's background check was not completed within two days prior to employment. This failure had the potential to expose residents to staff with criminal background. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/1/25 at 3:18 p.m. with Director Staff Development (DSD), LVN 1's Employee File (EF) was reviewed. The EF indicated LVN 1's hire date was 2/6/23 and LVN 1's background check was completed on 3/18/23 (one month and six days later). DSD stated the background check was completed after the hire date and background checks should be completed before hire date. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Background Screening Investigations, dated 3/2019, the P&P indicated, The director of personnel, or designee, conducts background checks, reference checks and criminal conviction checks (including fingerprinting as may be required by state law) on all potential direct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nationally recognized infection prevention and control practices provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC-agency responsible for preventing infectious diseases) were followed and implemented when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 entered Resident 96's room with Enhanced Barrier Precaution (reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO]- bacteria that resist treatment with more than one antibiotic) posted outside the door, without proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE-refers to gowns, gloves, masks, face shield, or goggles to protect the individual from injury or infection). 2. Hand hygiene was not provided for two of five sampled residents (Resident 38 and Resident 15) before their food trays were delivered. These failures had the potential for infectious diseases to be transmitted to residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/10/25 at 10 a.m. in Resident 96's room, it was noted Resident 96 was on EBP for a wound on the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders (PO) for six of twelve sampled residents (Resident 10, Resident 26, Resident 352, Resident 351, Resident 96, and Resident 2) when: 1. Resident 10's blood work (labs) were not drawn monthly as ordered. This failure resulted in the physician to be unaware of the medication levels and the potential for Resident to have seizures. 2. Nursing staff did not put compression stockings on Resident 26. This failure had the potential for Resident 26 to develop a Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT- blood clot). 3. Nursing staff did not administer intravenous (IV- in the vein) medications at the ordered rate for four out of six residents (Resident 352, Resident 351, Resident 96, and Resident 2) on IV medication Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 10's, admission Record (AR), dated 6/3/19, the AR indicated, Resident 10 has a medical diagnosis of Epilepsy (Seizure Disorder). During a review of Resident 10's, Order Summary Report (OSR), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain competency (skills and knowledge to perform a job) for one of one Registered Nurse (RN 1) when RN 1 did not have documented competencies to calculate intravenous (IV-within the vein) medication flow rates. This failure had the potential for the residents to receive incorrect doses of medications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/12/25 at 2:30 p.m. with RN 1 in Resident 352's room, Resident 352 had IV Antibiotic Piperacillin-Tazobactam (medication to treat infection) actively infusing through an IV dial-a flow administration set (tubing connection the IV medication to the resident's IV access site) which included a flow rate controller set to open (unmetered flow). Resident 352's IV antibiotic medication label indicated, Piper/Tazo to NACL[sodium chloride] as directed and immediately infuse 100 ML (3.375G) over 1 hour IV via Gravity Flow Every 8 Hours. Flow rate controller was set at 300 ml per hour. RN 1 stated IV medication was flowing at 40 drops per minute. RN 1 stated she checked on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled,Discarding and Destroying Medications when: 1. Two of two sampled Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN 5 and LVN 1) did not discard medication in the pharmacy discard bin. 2. One of two sampled medication carts was left unlocked and unattended. 3. Controlled Drug Records (CDR) were not signed by two nurses. These failures had the potential for medications to go unaccounted for and potentially result in drug diversion. Findings: 1a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/10/25 at 9:12 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5 in Resident 74's room, a white round pill was seen on the floor next to Resident 74's bed. LVN 5 stated it's a pill and she (LVN 5) did not know where the medication came from. LVN 5 stated, It's [unsecure medication] high risk and a resident can pick up the medication and put it in their mouth. LVN 5 put the white pill in the trash can that was in Resident 74's room. LVN 5 stated medication should be destroyed in the blue bin in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 96) was determined capable of self-medication administration (the ability of a person to take medication independently) when Resident 96 had eye drops at the bedside to self-administer. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 96 administering medication without the appropriate guidance on how to instill the eye drops in his eyes, possible side-effects, and drug reaction. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/10/25 at 10 a.m. with Resident 96 in Resident 96's room, a covered container was on the overbed table and had an ophthalmic solution (artificial tears and lubricant) eye drops at the bedside. Resident 96 stated he had been using and putting eye drops in his eyes, especially after eye surgery. Resident 96 stated the nurses knew I had this eye drops for a long time. Resident 96 stated some nurses had seen him put eye drops in his eyes. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/11/25 at 8:54 a.m. with Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive (legal document indicating person's preference for end-of-life treatment decisions) was offered and completed for one of five sampled residents (Resident 16). This failure had the potential for Resident 16's healthcare wishes to not be honored. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/11/25 at 2:21 p.m. with Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool) Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 16's Medical Record (MR), [undated] was reviewed. MDSC stated she could not find Resident 16's completed AD in the MR. MDSC stated stated Resident 16's AD should be in the MR. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Advance Directives, dated 2013, the P&P indicated, 1. Prior to or upon admission of a resident to our facility, the Social Service Director or designee will provide written information to the resident concerning his/her right to make decisions concerning medical care, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment, and the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Transfer or Discharge, Facility-Initiated, when the facility did not send a notice of transfer to the ombudsman (an advocate for residents of long-term care facilities) for two of two sampled residents (Resident 16 and Resident 38). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 16 and Resident 38 not having an advocate who could inform them of their admission, transfer, and discharge rights and options. Findings: During an interview on 2/11/25 at 9:28 a.m. with Resident 16, Resident 16 stated the facility sent her to the hospital on 1/26/25 and again on 2/9/25. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/13/25 at 10:49 a.m. with Social Services Director (SSD), Resident 38's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 11/9/24 was reviewed. SSD stated the OSR indicated Resident 38 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. SSD stated she could not find documentation of the Ombudsman notification of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and document urine output for one of one sampled resident (Resident 3) with a urostomy ( opening in the stomach wall to allow urine to pass). This failure resulted in the physician being unaware of accurate measurements of urine output to meet the individualized needs of Resident 3. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 3:21 p.m. with Resident 3 in Resident 3's room, Resident 3 had a urostomy on the left lower section of his abdomen without a bag attached. Resident 3 stated he self catheterizes (inserts a tube into the urostomy to collect urine) himself when needed. During a review of Resident 3's Care Plan Report (CPR), dated [DATE], the CPR indicated, Focus-Bladder: At risk for complications with urinary system . Resident may straight cath [catheter, flexible tube] via Urostomy PRN [as needed]; LN [licensed nurse] to monitor output Q [every] shift. During a review of Resident 3's Order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the discharge summary for two of two sampled residents (Resident 60 and Resident 84) were completed accurately. This failure had the potential for Resident 60 and Resident 84 to miss their follow-up care, not have details of their ongoing care, and could negatively impact Resident 60 and Resident 84's safety. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 60's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 60 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including Parkinsonism (group of symptoms characterized by tremor, slowed movements, rigidity, and postural instability), Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (shrinking and weakening of the muscles), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), Hepatic Encephalopathy (deterioration of brain function that occurs in people with severe liver disease), and Liver Cirrhosis (severe scarring of the liver). During a concurrent interview and record review on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foot care was provided for one of one sampled resident (Resident 84). This failure resulted in Resident 84 to not being referred to podiatry (the medical care and treatment for disorders of the feet and toenails). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/10/25 at 11:04 a.m. with Resident 84 in Resident 84's room, Resident 84's lower extremities were uncovered. The right great toenail was thick and yellowish in color, and the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and fifth toenails were also yellowish in color. On the right 2nd, 3rd and 4th toes were small scabs. The 2nd right toe was red. The skin behind the right great toe was thick and dry. The left great toenail was thick, long, and yellowish in color. The left 2nd, 3rd, 4th 5th toenails were also long, and yellowish in color. The skin behind the left great toe was thick and dry. On the left 2nd toe was a scab. Resident 84 stated he had not seen a podiatrist. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/10/25 at 11:27 a.m. with Registered Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Performance Evaluations (PE-employee feedback on job performance) for two of eight sampled employees (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] 1 and CNA 5) were completed. This failure had the potential for the staff to not be aware of their need for improvement in areas of patient care. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/12/25 at 10:10 a.m. with Human Resources Payroll (HR), CNA 1's PE was reviewed. The PE indicated, CNA 1 was hired on 2/6/23. HR stated there was no PE found in CNA 1's employee file. HR stated CNA 1's annual PE had not been completed for the last two years. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/12/25 at 10:30 a.m. with HR, CNA 5's PE was reviewed. The PE indicated, CNA 5 was hired on 3/15/23. HR stated there was no PE found in CNA 5's employee file. HR stated CNA 5's annual PE had not been completed. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Performance Evaluations, dated February 2023, the P&P indicated, The job performance of each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent (5%) during the medication pass observation. The facility has a medication error rate of 9.26 % consisting of five medication errors in a sample size of 54 opportunities for error. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/12/25 at 2:30 p.m. with RN 1 in Resident 352's room, Resident 352 had intravenous (IV, in the vein) Antibiotic Piperacillin-Tazobactam (medication to treat infection) actively infusing through an IV dial-a flow administration set (tubing connection the IV medication to the resident's IV access site) which included a flow rate controller set to open (unmetered flow). Resident 352's IV antibiotic medication label indicated, Piper/Tazo to NACL[sodium chloride] as directed and immediately infuse 100 ML (3.375G) over 1 hour IV via Gravity Flow Every 8 Hours. Flow rate controller was set at 300 ml per hour. RN 1 stated the current IV antibiotic flow rate should be at 24 drops per minute. During a concurrent observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to evaluate food preferences for one of one resident (Resident 90). This failure resulted in Resident 90 eating peanut butter and jelly sandwiches every meal, seven days a week, which triggered Resident 90's discontent and anger. Findings: During an interview on 2/10/25 at 10:56 a.m. with Resident 90, Resident 90 stated, Food here is terrible, it is bland. There is no seasoning, and the food is cold (temperature) when I get it. I have always asked for an alternative, but I get peanut butter and jelly sandwich every meal, seven days a week. Resident 90 stated he did not recall speaking to someone from the kitchen. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/10/25 at 12:16 p.m. with Resident 90, in Resident 90's room, Resident 90 was served his lunch tray with peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Resident 90 refused to eat lunch. Resident 90 stated, Just leave the sandwich, I will eat it later. During a review of Resident 90's Meal Ticket for lunch was reviewed. The meal ticket indicated, Regular, NAS (No added salt), 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical records for one of two sampled residents (Resident 40). This failure had the potential for Resident 40's physician to be unaware of Resident 40's edema and therefore not ordering appropriate tests or order medication. Findings: During an observation on 2/10/25 at 2:50 p.m. with Resident 40 in Resident 40's room, Resident 40's lower extremities (legs) and both feet were edematous (swollen). During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/12/25 at 2:18 p.m. with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 40's Weekly Nursing Summary (WNS-accurate reflection of the resident's status the previous week), dated 1/18/25, 1/24/25, 1/31/25, and 2/7/25, were reviewed. MDSC was unable to find nursing documentation in the WNS regarding Resident 40's lower extremities edema. MDSC stated there was no mention in the weekly nursing summary of Resident 40's edema. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/12/25 at 2:32 p.m. with MDSC, MDSC was unable to find an IDT Note addressing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy & procedure (P&P) on Binding Arbitration Agreement (BAA - a way to resolve disputes between healthcare providers and residents) for two of two sampled residents (Resident 15 and Resident 33) when admission staff did not document a verbal acknowledgement of the BAA from Resident 15's Family Representative (RP 15) and Resident 33's Family Representative (RP 33). This failure had the potential for facility staff to be unaware if family representatives fully understood the legal document they were signing. Findings: During an interview on 2/12/25 at 10:08 a.m. with RP 15, RP 15 stated she had signed the BAA for Resident 15. RP 15 stated she acknowledged the understanding of the BAA and stated she did not have any questions or concerns. During an interview on 2/12/25 at 10:22 a.m. with RP 33, RP 33 stated she had signed the BAA for Resident 33. RP 33 stated she acknowledged the understanding of the BAA and stated she did not have any issues or concerns. During a concurrent interview and record review on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI-takes a systematic, comprehensive, and data-driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes) Program for all 96 residents residing in the facility. This failure had the potential for residents to not receive an acceptable standards of care, and the facility to not be able to identify areas of improvement. Findings: During an interview on 2/13/25 at 9:03 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, LVN 3 did not know the QAPI plan. LVN 3 had no knowledge of the facility's process improvement projects. During an interview on 2/13/25 at 9:05 a.m. with LVN 4, LVN 4 did not know what QAPI meant. LVN 4 was not able to articulate the current process improvement projects being worked on in the facility. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/13/25 at 2:21 p.m. with the Administrator, Administrator stated the facility has a QAPI Committee that meets monthly and/or quarterly and attended by the Medical Director, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) pressure injury (PI-pressure injury is localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence). This failure had the potential for unmet care needs and Resident 1 ' s wound to worsen. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Progress Note (PN), dated 7/20/24, the PN indicated Resident was transferred to the acute hospital and was re-admitted back to the facility on 8/2/24. Resident 1 ' s readmission Skin Assessment (RSA), dated 8/2/24, indicated Resident 1 was re-admitted with a PI to right buttock. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 8/2/24, the OSR indicated and order for Medihoney (wound gel) to be applied to Resident 1 ' s PI to right buttock every day for 21 days. A review of Resident 1 ' s care plan indicated no documented evidence a care plan was developed for Resident 1 ' s PI to right buttock. During concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided with appropriate pain management. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 ' s pain to not effectively managed. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, (AR) the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including pain due to internal orthopedic prosthetic device (a medical implant that replaces or supports a damaged bone or joint) and unilateral osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint condition that primarily affects one side of the body, typically in the knees, hips, or hands). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Admission/readmission Evaluation/Assessment, (AREA) dated 8/23/24, the AREA indicated, Resident 1 Arrived to facility at 2210 (10:10 p.m.) . (Resident 1) has C/O (complaints of) Pain 5/10 on pain scale (numeric pain scale - allow patients to rate their pain. Zero (0) is considered no pain; 1 to 3 is mild pain; 4 to 6 is moderate pain and 7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of admission for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3). This failure had the potential for the residents and/or responsible party (RP) to be unaware of the plan of care. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Baseline Care Plan Person-Centered Care Planning (BCPPCCP), dated 8/6/24, the BCPPCCP indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE]. Social Services and Rehabilitative Services sections were completed on 8/12/24 (6 days after admission) and Activities section was completed on 8/27/24 (21 days after admission). b. During a review of Resident 2 ' s BCPPCCP dated 8/19/24, the BCPPCCP indicated, Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE]. Social Services section was completed on 8/22/24 (3 days after admission), Rehabilitative Services section was completed on 8/23/24 (4 days after admission). c. During a review of Resident 3 ' s BCPPCP dated 8/15/24, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavioral health services were provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 ' s psychosocial needs not being met. Findings: During an interview on 8/27/24 at 1:50 p.m. with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated, (Resident 1) refuses (care) every day, she ' s hardheaded. During an interview on 8/27/24 at 2:30 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated, There are instances when she (Resident 1) refuses (care) and she would put her weight and try to get on the floor. When she starts refusing that ' s when I know she does not want to be touched. She is one that needs to be watched a lot. She does a lot of grabbing of clothing. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/27/24 at 3:18 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1 ' s Behavior Symptoms (BS), dated 8/27/24 was reviewed. The BS indicated Resident 1 had episodes of behaviors documented on 8/14/24, 8/15/24, 8/20/24, and 8/21/24. DON stated, There is yelling, pushing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to ensure one of the four sampled residents ' (Resident 1) rights to receive a telephone call was honored when the facility did not allow Resident 1 to receive a telephone call. This failure resulted in violating Resident 1 rights to communication. Findings: During an interview on 8/13/24 at 3:45 p.m. with Complainant 1, Complainant 1 stated, Staff did not want to give me her [staff] information because I did not give her my information. I was contacting the resident because I had a confidential call. But the receptionist did not want to hand over the phone to the resident. The receptionist makes it clear that it is impossible to transfer the phones. During an interview on 8/14/24 at 10:55 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, RN 1 stated, I tried to ask the lady [Complainant 1], she [Complainant 1] didn ' t want to give us her name and due to HIPPA [Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-Federal law to protect sensitive patient health information from being disclosed without consent] I could not give her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) received the necessary services for pressure injuries (PI- pressure injury is localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence) to promote healing. This failure had the potential for unmet care needs for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s IDT (interdisciplinary team) - Skin Management Note, (IDTSMN) dated 7/5/24, the IDTSMN indicated, (Resident 1) is non compliant [sic] to turn every 2 hours to offload pressure from Coccyx (tail bone) area and to elevating legs to promote circulation. Risks and benefits explained by the nurse, The (Resident 1) verbalized understanding. During a review of Resident 1 ' s IDTSMN, dated 7/12/24, the IDTSMN indicated, (Resident 1) is non compliant [sic] to turn every 2 hours to offload pressure from Coccyx area and to elevating legs to promote circulation. Risks and benefits explained by the nurse, The (Resident 1) verbalized understanding. During an interview on 8/1/24 at 1:56 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was frequently pulling out his Gastrostomy Tube (G-Tube-tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach for nutrition, hydration, and medication). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 frequently going to the general acute care hospital for re-insertion of the frequently pulled G-Tube. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 4/26/2024, the AR indicated, Resident 1 had a diagnosis Gastrostomy Status. During a review of Resident 1's SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation) Communication and Progress Note (SBAR), dated: a) 4/30/2024, the SBAR indicated, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) reported to this nurse as she was doing patient care, resident [1] pulled out G-Tube. Resident was sent to emergency room (ER). b) 5/3/2024, the SBAR indicated, Resident [1] pulled G-Tube out. MD [Medical Doctor] notified and ordered this nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, or Misappropriation-Reporting Investigating for one of the three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 made an allegation of neglect and facility did not investigate and report to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 experiencing continued neglect. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/11/24 at 1:35 p.m. with Resident 1, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was lying in bed. Resident 1 stated the facility was taking a long time to attend to her needs. Resident 1 stated, I was concerned for my life. I wasn't getting my medication, just let's say this, I asked for help so many times and no one knew where anyone was. I waited for 30 minutes for someone to come and then everyone was mad at me for calling the police. During a review of Residents 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-Assessment Tool), dated May 9, 2024. The MDS indicated Resident 1 had a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when the Social Services Designee (SSD) did not follow up and provide psychosocial monitoring for Resident 1 after an allegation of neglect. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 experiencing psychosocial distress. Findings: During a review of Residents 1's Progress Notes (PN), dated 5/20/24, the PN indicated, Resident [1] called the police accusing the facility of not taking care of her, when nurse talked to resident [1], she stated nobody has taken care of her or given her medicine since 9 a.m. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/11/24 at 2:10 p.m. with SSD, SSD stated, I was not aware [of allegation of neglect], I leave at 4:30 p.m. and I wasn't aware she called the cops [police]. SSD stated she did not follow up with Resident 1 after the neglect allegation. SSD was unable to provide documentation of psychosocial assessment. During a review of the facility, Job Description: Social Services Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided advance notice of a room change during a three-day hospital transfer. This failure resulted in Resident 1 being unaware he was returning to a different room. Findings: During a review of Resident1's Bed-Hold and Return Agreement (BHRA) dated 3/24/24, the BHRA indicated, I, [Resident 1], a resident of this facility, hereby request that the facility hold my bed space during my absence during my absence from the facility.[Resident 1's signature]. During a review of Resident 1's Census List (CL) dated 6/27/24, the CL indicated, 4/25/2020.Actual Admission.3/24/2024.Transfer Out to Hospital.3/26/2024 (2 days later) .Room Change.3/27/24.Transfer in from Hospital. During an interview on 5/31/24 at 11:56 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated, Resident 1 went to the hospital on 3/24/24. DON stated, during Resident 1's hospital stay, Resident 1's room was made into a female room for the good of the facility community and Resident 1's belongings were moved to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat one of four sampled resident (Resident 1) with dignity and respect when the facility failed to permit Resident 1 to return to his previous room after three days of being in the hospital. This resulted in Resident 1 moving to a different room without his consent and violation of Resident 1's rights. Findings: During an interview on 4/11/24 at 10:15 a.m. with Director of Nurses (DON), DON stated Resident 1 was transferred to the acute hospital on 3/24/24 and returned to the facility after four days of hospitalization. DON stated Resident 1's previous bed in room [ROOM NUMBER] was no longer available and was moved to room [ROOM NUMBER]. DON stated the facility admitted two female residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] while Resident 1 was out to the acute hospital. During a review of Resident 1's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized, comprehensive assessment tool) dated 3/28/24 indicated, Resident 1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered medications were administered for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have adverse outcomes. Findings: During a concurrent interviews and record review on 2/14/24, at 11:24 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON reviewed Resident 1 ' s Medication Administration Record, dated January 2024. DON confirmed the following: Budesonide [medication used to prevent difficulty breathing, chest tightness, wheezing, and coughing caused by asthma]Inhalation[ breathing in] . 0.5mg [milligrams-unit of measure] inhale orally two times a day for asthma [a chronic lung disease] -Start Date- 01/08/2024 0900 [9 a.m.] -D/C [discontinued] Date- 01/21/2024 2140 [9:40 p.m.] 1/9/24 at 9 a.m. 9 [9=Other/see Nurses Notes] was documented, no documentation Resident 1 was administered Budesonide. 1/12/24 at 9 9.m. 9 [9=Other/see Nurses Notes] was documented, [nurses note indicated Budesonide was not available] no documentation Resident 1 was administered Budesonide.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility to: 1. Provide oxygen as ordered by Medical Doctor (MD) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). 2. Provide humidified (increase the moisture) oxygen for two of three sampled residents on continuous oxygen (Resident 1, Resident 2). These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents medical condition. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1 admission RECORD (AR), dated 1/9/24, the AR indicated, Resident 1 diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure (inability of the respiratory system to meet the oxygen demands of the body) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/9/24 at 1:12 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, in Resident 1 ' s room, LVN 1 noted the setting for Resident 1 ' s oxygen and stated it was set at 2.5 liters (liter - a unit of measurement). LVN 1 stated Resident 1 ' s oxygen should be set at 3 liters. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards for food service safety and sanitary kitchen conditions. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illness (illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) for at-risk vulnerable residents when: 1. Cold storage food items were not labeled per facility food service safe storage and guidelines. 2. Dry storage canned products were retained when dented. 3. Persons entering the kitchen and food service area did not adhere to food service safety and sanitary kitchen professional standards. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/22/24 at 8:37 a.m. with Dietary Director (DD) in the cold storage room the following was found: A one-gallon (measurement of volume) container of DILL PICKLES SLICES indicated a use by date of 1/15/23. DD stated the item should have been discarded or used by 1/15/23 for the purpose of ensuring the best quality. DD stated the facility process for safe food handling and storage was to label the perishable food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for one of 42 sampled residents (Resident 345) when Resident 345's call light was on the floor. This failure had the potential for Resident 345's needs not being met. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/22/24 at 8:38 a.m. with Business Office Manager (BOM) in Resident 345's room, Resident 345 was sitting in a wheelchair, eating her breakfast with her call light on the floor, and not within resident's reach. BOM stated the call light was on the floor and it's not within her (Resident 345) reach. During a review of Resident 345's Nursing Functional Abilities (NFA), dated January 2024, the NFA indicated, Toileting Hygiene is Dependent. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Answering the Call Light dated 2010, the P&P indicated, The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs. 5. When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an Advance Directive (AD Legal documentation consistent with the known requests or desires of the patient's medical preference) was not in the chart for one of 42 sampled residents (Resident 50). This failure had the potential for Resident 50 to not receive the necessary treatment when needed. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/25/24 at 2:31 p.m. with Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) 1, Resident 50's admission Record (AR), undated was reviewed. The AR indicated, Resident 50 had executed an AD before 1/03/20. Upon reviewing record no AD was found in Resident 50's chart. RNC 1 stated, We don't have a copy on file of advance directive. During a review of facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Advance Directives, dated 2022, the P&P indicated, The resident has the right to formulate an advance directive, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment. Advance directives are honored in accordance with state law and facility policy. 1. If the resident or the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 42 sampled residents (Resident 24), had a notification sent to the long-term care ombudsman (Ombudsman are representatives that assist residents in long-term care facilities with issues related to day-to-day care, health, safety, and personal preferences) when Resident 24 was transferred to the hospital. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 24 not being protected from an inappropriate discharge and not having access to an advocate who can inform them of their options and rights. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/25/24 at 2:31 p.m. with Social Services Director (SSD), the facility's Admission/Discharge To/From Report (AD), dated 11/1/23-11/30/23 and 12/1/23-12/31/23 was reviewed. The AD indicated Resident 24 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and 12/12/23, and the ombudsman office was sent the AD on 1/3/24. SSD stated the November and December AD was sent in January. SSD confirmed the AD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) when: 1. Resident 5 did not have a smoking assessment completed. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 5 not being assessed and jeopardize his safety. 2. Resident 7 did not have a weekly skin assessment of a pressure ulcer (Injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin). This failure had the potential for Resident 7 to not receive needed care and treatments. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/23/24 at 10:56 a.m. with Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) 1, Resident 5's NURSING-RNA WEEKLY (LICENSED STAFF ATTESTATION OF SIGNATURE) Type: Nursing -Smoking Obs, undated was reviewed. RNC 1 stated the assessment for 4/20/23 was not completed and it should have been done quarterly. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Smoking Policy-Residents, dated 2022, the P&P indicated, This facility has established and maintains safe resident smoking practices.8. A resident's ability to smoke safely is re-evaluated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 42 sampled residents (Resident 3) had a comprehensive care plan (includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs) developed and implemented for his dental concerns. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Patient 3's safety, psychosocial, and care needs. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/22/24 at 9:38 a.m. with Resident 3 in the resident's room, Resident 3 was seen lying on his bed watching TV. Resident 3 stated he had a loose tooth and stated he had seen the Dentist but did not know when the Dentist was going to come back to the facility to remove the loose tooth. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/14/24 at 12:10 p.m. with Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) 1, Resident 3's Electronic Health Record (EHR) was reviewed. The EHR indicated, no care plan was developed for Resident 3's dental concerns. RNC 1 stated there was no dental care plan for Resident 3 and it should have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered anticoagulant (blood thinner medication) was available for administration for one of 42 sampled residents (Resident 65). This failure had the potential for adverse health outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 65's Order Entry (OE), dated 8/16/23, the OE indicated, Clopidogrel Bisulfate [generic name for Plavix - blood thinner medication to prevent blood clots] Tablet 75 MG [milligram unit of measure] Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for HX [history] of PVD [peripheral vascular disease - narrowing of blood vessels in arms and legs]. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/24/24 at 8:51 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 outside of Resident 65's room, LVN 1 was preparing medications to be administered. LVN 1 stated the cart did not have Resident 65's dose of Plavix, and she would need to check the automated drug dispenser (ADD machine that automatically dispenses drugs/medications) in the medication room. LVN 1 stated she checked the ADD and there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was less than 5% for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 65 and Resident 39). This failure had the potential for adverse health outcomes related to incorrect medication administration. Findings: 1. During an observation on 1/24/24 at 8:51 a.m. outside of Resident 65's room, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 prepared Resident 65's medications for administration. LVN 1 administered Losartan (medication to lower blood pressure) and Sucralfate (antacid to treat or prevent stomach ulcers) to Resident 65. During a review of Resident 65's Medication Admin Audit Report (MAAR), dated 1/24/24, the MAAR indicated Resident 65 was scheduled to receive Losartan 25 mg (milligram - unit of measure) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension at 1:00 p.m. [Losartan was given during observation at 8:51 a.m.]. The MAAR indicated Resident 65 was to receive Sucralfate 1 gm (gram - unit of measure) Give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day for a history of GI Bleed scheduled at 7:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 42 sampled residents (Resident 2) had a TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone; primary stimulus for thyroid hormone production by the thyroid gland) level ordered. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 2 having a continued, unplanned weight gain. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/25/24 at 9:37 a.m. with the Minimum Data Set nurse (MDSN), Resident 2's SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) Communication Form and Progress Note (PN) for RNs [Registered Nurses]/LPN [Licensed Practical Nurse]/LVNs [Licensed Vocational Nurses], dated January 2024, was reviewed. The PN indicated, Weight gain of 18 lbs [pounds] (8.4%) in 90 days . Recommendations from IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] meeting, Check TSH levels . Recommendations of Primary Clinicians (if any): MD [medical doctor] notified and in agreement with IDT recommendations. MDSN stated there is no MD order for a TSH level, and there are no TSH level results in Resident 2's medical record (MR). During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for two of 42 sampled residents (Resident 39 and Resident 2) when hand hygiene was not provided before the food tray was delivered. This failure had the potential to adversely affect Resident 39 and Resident 2's health. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/22/24 at 1:42 p.m. with Resident 39 in resident's room, Resident 39 was given his food tray by admission Coordinator (AC). Resident 39 was asked if he had been offered or provided with hand sanitizing prior to him receiving his food tray. Resident 39 stated he had not sanitized his hands before his tray was delivered. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/22/24 at 1:44 p.m. with AC in Resident 39's room. AC delivered Resident 39's food tray without providing Resident 39 with hand hygiene. AC stated the residents usually get their hands sanitized before meals, but Resident 39 did not receive hand hygiene and he should have. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/22/24 at 1:49 p.m. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was assessed (evaluated) after an unwitnessed fall. This failure had the potential for injuries due to unsafe movement of Resident 1 by the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) from the floor to the wheelchair. Findings: During a review of the Facility's Reported Incident (FRI), dated 8/14/23, the FRI indicated, Resident 1 was found on the floor and her hip did not look right, Resident 1 was sent to emergency room (ER) and had a dislocated right hip (an injury in which the hipbone is displaced from its normal position). During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 8/22/23, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] for difficulty in walking and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] for fracture (broken bone) of the right hip. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS – standardized resident screening tool), dated 7/15/23, the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman (provides resolutions to issues, complaints, and concerns made by residents in licensed facilities. Also protects the rights of residents and responds to allegations, abuse, and neglect. Provides consumer information on literature and prevents inappropriate transfers and evictions) of discharge for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was inappropriately discharged home. This failure resulted in Resident 1 being discharged inappropriately and was sent to the hospital after only six hours of discharge. Findings: During an interview on 8/4/23 at 12:09 p.m. with Ombudsman, Ombudsman stated, After reviewing all the notices from [facility] for the month of July, including the date you provided, it [discharge notice] appears that we have not received a discharge notice for resident [1]. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/9/23 at 3:43 p.m. with Director of Social Services (DSS), Resident 1's Medical Records was reviewed, DSS stated, she did not send a discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$47,242 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $47,242 — penalty dated 2025-06-23
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROVIDENCE GROUP WINE COUNTRY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/16/2016 |
| PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/30/2023 |
| MEMON, PARVEZ | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/01/2018 |
| BLOOD, BRYCE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/15/2023 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $899K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056294. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.