No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sunrise Post Acute

3476 W. Wilson St., Banning, CA 92220 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 64 certified beds · (951) 849-4723 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$76,434 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (21% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $76,434 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-14)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3055 W Ramsey St · (951) 849-6794 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
806 W Ramsey St · (951) 849-8614 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3403 W Ramsey St · (951) 849-0667 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Sylvan Ave · (951) 922-3242 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
523 Morongo Ave · (951) 922-9398

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%4.0%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.9%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.1%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.4%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.9%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.9%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.6%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.3%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.9%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.432.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.711.571.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
47.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.82U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.35hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.46hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 47.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.82 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.0%CMS range 38.4–67.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.0–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge47.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge28.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 3.9–12.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.591.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.31
RN hours/ resident / day
1.09
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.54
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.94
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.15
RN hoursweekends
21.3%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 61.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 21% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-11)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2), to protect the resident ' s rights to be free from physical abuse by a resident, when a resident (Resident 1), diagnosed with dementia, and anxiety with no identified behavioral triggers, was moved rooms multiple times due to intolerance to noise without assessing the resident ' s individual needs. The failure of the facility in assessing resident ' s need for appropriate room placement resulted in Resident 1 assaulting Resident 2 who exhibited frequent moaning, mumbling, and yelling. Resident 2 sustained lacerations (a cut in the skin) to the head, extensive facial fractures (a break in a bone), two right rib fractures and L1 vertebra fracture (a break on the first bone on the lower back) and later passed away in the hospital. On May 13, 2025, at 4:45 p.m., the Administrator (ADM) and Director of Nursing (DON) were verbally notified of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ- situation in which the provider's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable environment was provided, for eight of eight residents (Residents 40, 36, 28, 15, 17, 32, 48, and 53), when the temperature in the resident's rooms were above 81 degrees Fahrenheit. On August 5, 2024, at 7:51 p.m., the Administrator (ADM), the Director of Nursing (DON), and the Director of Staff Development (DSD), were verbally notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ-situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused or likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death, to a resident), due to the facility's failure to provide a comfortable environment for eight residents (Residents 40, 36, 28, 15, 17, 32, 48, and 53) when the resident's room temperature were above 81 degrees Fahrenheit. These failures resulted in the discomfort for Residents 40, 36, 28, 15, 17, 32, 48, and 53, particularly for Resident 17 who could not breathe properly and for Resident 53…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2021-11-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen, for 51 of 53 residents receiving an oral diet, when the ice machine's evaporator (where ice was formed) was noted to have brown residue build-up, and the ice chute had slimy yellowish-brown residue build-up. In addition, the facility was not monitoring the cleanliness of the ice machine. These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illness in a highly susceptible population of 51 out of 53 residents who were on an oral diet. On November 1, 2021, at 5:25 p.m., the Administrator (AD), the Director of Nursing (DON), and the Food and Nutrition Supervisor (FNS) were verbally notified that an immediate jeopardy situation (situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident) existed regarding unsanitary conditions of the ice machine in the kitchen. The failure to properly clean the ice machine had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan (a document that outlines a patient's current health status, diagnoses, treatment goals, and interventions) to address the potential risk for physical agression related to the resident's preference for a quiet environment for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 being placed in a room with a resident (Resident 2), who exhibits behaviors of moaning and yelling, which subsequently resulted in Resident 1 assaulting Resident 2, with Resident 2 sustaining lacerations, extensive facial fractures, rib fractures and vertebra fracture. Resident 2 was transferred to the general acute care hospital (GACH), where the resident expired. Findings: On [DATE], Resident 2 ' s admission record was reviewed. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss), impulse disorder (a mental health condition) and hospice care services (specialized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported to the State agency immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made, for one of two residents reviewed for abuse (Resident 1).This failure had the potential to delay investigation of the allegation and implementation of measures necessary to ensure resident safety and prevent further abuse. Findings:On May 21, 2026, at 1:05 p.m., the California Department of Public Health received an online complaint reporting an allegation of abuse involving residents at the facility.On June 1, 2026, at 11:57 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to investigate an allegation abuse. A review of Resident 1's record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder (having worried thoughts).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated August 14, 2025, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (a cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to address a resident's behavioral symptoms for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 1).This failure had the potential to result in staff lacking appropriate guidance and interventions to consistently address the resident's behavioral symptoms and monitor the effectiveness of interventions. Findings:A review of Resident 1's record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder (having worried thoughts).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated August 14, 2025, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (a cognitive assessment) score of 15 (cognitively intact).A review of Resident 1's Change of Condition dated November 18, 2025, indicated, .False accusations. Resident noted screaming in the hallways, accusing the chairbound residents that they kicked her, verbally aggressive towards the staffs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-11 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was reviewed and updated annually and as needed.This failure resulted in an inaccurate evaluation of the facility's population and resources needed to provide the necessary care and services for the residents.Findings:On September 11, 2025, at 4:03 p.m., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the Administrator (ADM). The ADM stated he was responsible for conducting the facility assessment. The ADM stated the last facility assessment was on July 24, 2024. The ADM stated the facility assessment should have been done annually. During a review of the facility assessment dated [DATE], the ADM stated the facility assessment should reflect the accurate census of the facility and the cultural needs and services being rendered to that served population. The ADM stated that the facility assessment dated [DATE], failed to accurately detail the cultural assessment, staff types, services rendered, and building…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) failed to identify and address their deficient practice involving physician visits (cross reference F0712).This failure has the potential to put residents at risk for unidentified medical conditions which could result in inadequate quality of care and services.Findings:On September 11, 2025, at 4:33 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Administrator (ADM) and Medical Records (MR). The MR stated the QAPI Committee meets on a quarterly basis and as needed. The MR stated the last QAPI meeting was held on July 23, 2025, where they discussed falls, weight variance, elopement, and theft and loss. The ADM stated the QAPI team was unaware of the deficient practice regarding the nurse practitioner (NP) completing the initial visits. The ADM stated the facility did not have a system in place to ensure initial resident visits were conducted by the primary physician. A review of the facility policy and procedure titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the fluid intake and output in 24 hours was accurately monitored, recorded, and evaluated as ordered by the physician for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 19). This failure had the potential for the resident to experience complications associated with fluid deficit and/or fluid overload.Findings:On September 9, 2025, Resident 19's record was reviewed. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD - severe and irreversible loss of kidney function that requires ongoing treatment to maintain life), congestive heart failure (CHF - chronic condition where the heart cannot pump blood effectively enough to meet the body's needs leading fluid buildup in the lungs, legs, and other parts of the body),dementia (progressive impairment of intellectual functioning, memory, and abstract thinking), and dependence on renal dialysis (medical procedure that removes waste products and excess fluid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-11 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician conducted the initial visit for five of ten sampled residents (Residents 28, 35, 26, 22, 47).These failures had the potential to result in unidentified medical conditions and/or insufficient provision of medical treatment.Findings:On September 10, 2025, Resident 28's record was reviewed. Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].The document titled, History and Physical, dated June 25, 2025, indicated Resident 28 had the capacity to make decisions. The document further indicated, .More than 30 minutes was spent in the evaluation and treatment of this patient during this encounter including: history and physical examination, review of nursing notes, medication reconciliation, review of pertinent diagnostic testing, documentation in the clinical record, patient counseling and communication with the nursing staff and responsible parties .I have discussed my evaluation and findings with my supervising physician, (Physician 1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' right to self-administer medications for one of two residents (Resident 26) reviewed, when one opened box of Systane (eyedrops to prevent dryness of the eyes), a box of Lmnoop eczema relief cream (eczema-skin condition causing itching and dryness), and a bottle of Migrastil pain roll-on (pain relief cream) were observed on top of the resident's bedside table.This failure had the potential for Resident 26 to self-administer medications without a physician's order.Findings:On September 8, 2025, at 9:34 a.m., Resident 26 was observed lying in bed, watching television. One box of Lmnoop eczema cream, one box of Systane eyedrops, and one bottle of migrastil pain block roll-on were observed inside of a small box on top of Resident 26's bedside table. The box of Systane eyedrops, the box of Lmnoop eczema cream, and the bottle of migrastil pain roll-on were not labeled with Resident 26 identifiers. In a concurrent interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident 6) was free from unnecessary medications when adequate indications (clinical rationale) for antipsychotic (drug to reduce disordered thinking) use were not documented. This failure had the potential for the resident to experience adverse outcomes from the unnecessary use of the antipsychotic medication such as Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome (life-threatening reaction), tardive dyskinesia (chronic, involuntary movements), and increased risk of falls that could impair their ability to function at their highest level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings:During a review of Resident 6's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 1 Screening (screening to identify residents if they have a suspected mental illness), dated June 12, 2025, completed by the general acute care hospital prior to the resident's nursing home admission, the PASRR indicated, No, for the Section III - Serious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, a left elbow skin discoloration, identified on September 9, 2025, was reported and referred to the physician in a timely manner for treatment orders, for one of eight resident's reviewed (Resident 8).This failure has the potential for the resident to experience complications due to the delay in monitoring and treatment.Findings:On September 9, 2025, at 9:43 a.m., an observation with a concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 8. Resident 8 was in bed, alert, and interviewable. Observed on Resident 8's left elbow was a purplish skin discoloration, with skin intact, and with no redness or swelling noted on the surrounding skin area. In a concurrent interview, Resident 8 stated she has had the purplish skin discoloration on her elbow for days and it did not hurt. Resident 8 stated she must have gotten it when the nurses pulled her up for repositioning or when her elbow probably hit the side table on her bed.On September 11,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and treatment for one resident reviewed for oxygen administration (Resident 4), when the physician's order for oxygen administration was not followed. This failure had the potential to result in ineffective oxygen therapy, respiratory distress, and decline in the resident's health condition.Findings:On September 8, 2025, at 11:23 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 4. Resident 4 was observed in bed with oxygen (O2) via nasal cannula (NC - a tube used to deliver oxygen through the nose). Resident 4's oxygen administration was observed at 6 liters per minute (LPM). Resident 4 stated she needed O2 because she was short of breath. Resident 4 stated she had to take off the NC because it was making her nose dry. Resident 4 stated she did not know what rate her O2 should be on.On September 8, 2025, at 11:29 a.m., a concurrent observation, interview and record review was conducted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, an assessment was conducted by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, prior to obtaining a pain medication order to treat migraine ( severe headache) for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 35). This failure has the potential to result to inadequate pain management for Resident 35. Findings:On September 9, 2025, at 11:41 a.m., an observation with a concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 35. Resident 35 was in bed, alert, and interviewable. Resident 35 stated she had been requesting to see her physician because she needed to talk to him about her pain medications.On September 9, 2025, Resident 35's record was reviewed. Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fibromyalgia (condition that causes pain in muscles and soft tissues all over the body).The Physician's Order' dated August 21, 2025, indicated to give Nurtec Oral Disintegrating (brand name medication used to treat migraine) Tablet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and effective pharmaceutical services when: 1. For two of two residents (Resident 34 and Resident 35), inhalers were not appropriately administered. This failure had the potential for the residents to experience preventable breathing problems and/or other adverse clinical outcomes. 2. One of one opened blood glucose (sugar) test strip vial stored in the medication cart was undated in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. This failure had the potential for unusable test strips to be used to measure residents' fingerstick blood glucose levels to determine the dose of insulin to be administered. Findings:1a. During a review of Resident 34's HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION [H&P - comprehensive patient assessment], dated March 19, 2025, the H&P indicated a past medical history of COPD [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - ongoing lung condition]. During a review of Resident 34's medical record, the medical record indicated a physician's orders dated August 27, 2025, for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and effective medication labeling and controlled (narcotics) drug storage when: 1. Three of three artificial tears (drug to lubricate dry eyes) medication bottles were not properly labeled with sufficient information to identify the specific resident. This failure had to potential to cause preventable infections from cross-contamination from eye drops were inadvertently mixed up with other residents. 2. The keys to the discontinued controlled substances were stored in an unlocked drawer in the half-opened Director of Nursing (DON) office. This failure had the potential for drug diversion (theft or preventable loss) and impaired (under the influence) staff providing care for a universe of 62 residents. Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on September 8, 2025, at 3:33 p.m., an inspection of a medication cart was conducted with Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1). When the medication cart was opened, three opened carton boxes of artificial tears eye drops (National Drug Code 57896-181-05)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nutrition services were provided for two of three residents (Resident 22 and Resident 26) reviewed, when:1.Resident 22, dietary preferences were not met; and2.Resident 26 annual (yearly) nutritional assessment had not been conducted.These failures had the potential for Resident 22 and Resident 26 to have inadequate dietary intake because reasonable efforts were not made to accommodate Resident 22's food preferences and Resident 26's annual nutritional assessment were not performed.Findings:1.On September 8, 2025, at 9:34 a.m., Resident 26 was observed sitting up in bed alert and oriented. During a concurrent interview with Resident 26, she stated the facility food is a mushy mess and did not receive what is on the menu. Resident 26 further stated if she did not like what is on the menu she ordered her own food. One box of Cheerios cereal and a case of cup of noodles soup was observed stored on Resident 26's closet.On September 8,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were not stored in the refrigerator, readily available for use. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illness to a vulnerable facility population.Findings:On September 8, 2025, at 8:50 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) and the Dietary Aide (DA). One prune juice carton labeled with a use-by- date of August 30, 2025, was observed in the refrigerator, readily available for use. The DA stated the August 30, 2025 date was the date when the juice carton was opened, and it should have been discarded five days after the open date. In a concurrent interview, the DS stated the date of August 30, 2025 was the date when the prune juice was opened and once opened, it was good for five days. The DS stated the prune juice should have been discarded and not stored in the refrigerator passed the use-by-date.The facility policy and procedure, titled, Dry Goods Storage Guidelines, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were followed and implemented when two employees from a consulting doctor's office did not follow an Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that required use of gown and glove during high contact resident care activities) for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 59).This failure had the potential to increase the spread of pathogens (germs) and infections by staff to the residents. Findings:On September 9, 2025, at 10:49 a.m. an observation was conducted on Resident 59's room. Observed outside Resident 59's room was a sign indicating Resident 59 and his room mate were both on EBP. PPE (Protective Personal Equipment - items of protective clothing or equipment designed to guard against health and safety hazards, e.g. mask, gown, gloves) supplies, including gown, mask, and gloves were observed stored by the door. The EBP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a report with sufficient information to describe the alleged physical abuse that occurred between two residents (Residents 1 and 2) was provided to the State Agency (SA) and Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (a resident advocate) on May 8, 2025. This failure had the potential for the SA and other officials to receive misleading informations which could negatively affect the investigation compromising the safety of the residents at the facility. Findings: On May 9, 2025, Resident 2 ' s admission record was reviewed. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss), impulse disorder (a mental health condition) and hospice care services (specialized end-of-life care). A review of Resident 2's History and Physical, dated April 9, 2023, indicated Resident 2 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 2's IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) Note, dated May 8, 2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed, for one of three residents (Resident 1), to ensure an Advance Directive Acknowledgement (AD- written instruction such as living will or durable power of attorney for health care about the provision of care and services the resident preferred when he is no longer able to decide for himself), Consent to Treat, POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment - a physician's order that outlines a plan for end of life care reflecting both a resident's preference and a physician's judgement based on medical evaluation), and Bed Hold Notification Policy were initiated and/or discussed with the resident, family member, and/or legal representative upon admission to the facility. This failure had the potential for the residents to receive unnecessary care/treatment and services. Findings: On January 2, 2025, at 10:55 a.m., an interview with a concurrent record review was conducted with the Social Service Director (SSD) regarding Resident 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, for two of three residents (Residents 1 and 2) a discharge plan was developed upon admission to meet the individual discharge planning needs. This failure had the potential for the residents to not receive necessary care and services to address resident's discharge needs and goals. Findings: On January 2, 2025, at 10:55 a.m., an interview with a concurrent record review was conducted Social Service Director (SSD). Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive disease that affects memory and other important mental functions). The document titled, Social History Assessment, printed on January 2, 2024, did not indicate a discharge plan was conducted for Resident 1. The discharge assessment section of the document was blank. Resident 1's Social History Assessment was 13 days past due. In a concurrent interview, the SSD stated a family member of Resident 1 called a few days after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate medical transfer to an acute hospital emergency department was provided to one of two residents reviewed (Resident 3). This failure had the potential to result in actual or potential harm to Resident 3's physical, mental, and/or psychosocial well-being. Findings: On [DATE], at 9:19 a.m., an interview with a concurrent record review was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- type of lung disease that block airflow making it difficult to breathe). The History and Physical dated [DATE], indicated Resident 3 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. The Physician's Orders for Life sustaining Treatment (POLST- a physician's order that outlines a plan for end of life care reflecting both a resident's preference and a physician's judgement based on medical evaluation), dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to hold a bed, during the 7-day bed hold period, for one out of four residents (Resident 1). The failure resulted in a prolonged stay at the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) when Resident 1 was ready for discharge back to the facility. Findings A review of Resident 1's medical records, titled, Resident information, dated, November 19, 2024, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on , June 27, 2024, with a diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage (brain bleed). Further review of Resident 1's record indicated, Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status ({BIMS}-memory assessment), score of 00 (severe memory impairment). Resident 1 had a legal Representative authorized to make medical decisions for resident. On December 4, 2024, at 9:58 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Medical Record (MR), who stated, when a resident is admitted to the facility, the admissions nurse reviews the 7-day Bed Hold Notification Policy, with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' mail was protected for privacy and confidentiality for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when the mailbox was not locked. This deficient practice had the potential for confidential information's, personnel letters, sensitive documents to be accessed by unauthorized individual. Findings: On October 7, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a complaint regarding resident rights. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included orthopedic (dealing with bones or muscles) aftercare and wasting and atrophy (decrease in size of an organ or tissue). On October 7, 2024, at 10:40 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview, the Director of Staff Development (DSD) stated that there were two mailboxes located outside the gate. The DSD stated both mailboxes were noted to be easily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed, for three of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication (Residents 5, 53, and 56), to ensure: a. An assessment was conducted for the continued use of antipsychotic medications (medication to treat mental disorders) for Residents 5, 53 and 56; and b. Monitoring for the use of hypnotic medication (medication use to help people fall asleep) for Resident 56. These failures had the potential for Residents 5, 53 and 56 to not be properly monitored and to receive unnecessary medications that could cause harm and or death. Findings: 1. On August 7, 2024, Resident 5's admission RECORD, was reviewed. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder (mental disorder that causes extreme mood swings). A review of Resident 5's History and Physical dated July 11, 2024, indicated Resident 5 can make decisions. A review of Resident 5's Order Summary Report, dated July 1- 31, 2024, indicated, .Aripiprazole (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were able to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services safely and effectively when [NAME] (CK) 1 and Dietary Aide (DA) 1 were unable to accurately verbalize the cool down process for hot food and ambient food temperatures. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for food borne diseases (illness resulting from ingestion of contaminated food) that can cause sickness and or death. Findings: On August 6, 2024, at 12:50 p.m., during an interview with DA 1 regarding the cool-down process for hot food and ambient food temperatures inside the kitchen, DA 1 stated she does not know the cool-down process for hot food. DA 1 further stated I will put ice on it. DA 1 stated for cooling down ambient food temperatures, such as tuna salad, she would place the tuna on ice after the food is made. DA 1 further stated she does not know the process for cooling down ambient food like tuna. On August 6, 2024, at 1 p.m., during an interview with CK 1 regarding the cool-down process for ambient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment, prepare, and served food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, when multiple sheet pans were found with brown-black discoloration. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for food borne diseases (illness that result from ingestion of contaminated food) that can cause sickness and or death. Findings: On August 5, 2024, at 8:15 a.m., during a concurrent walk-through observation and interview inside the kitchen with the Director of Food and Nutrition Services (DFS), one piece half-sheet pan and six full-sheet pans were found to have brown-black grime build up. The DFS stated the the pans are very old and needs to be replaced, and the brown- black discoloration was food residue. The DFS further stated the pans should not be in that condition, as the grime can cross-contaminate food and cause food borne illness to the residents. On August 8, 2024, at 8:16 a.m., during an interview with the RD, she stated that her expectation is the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee monitored and re-evaluated identified concern regarding hot temperature levels in resident rooms (rooms 22, 23, 24 and 25). This failure resulted in unsafe and uncomfortable temperature levels (above 81 degrees Fahrenheit) in resident rooms, affecting the quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety (cross-reference F584). Findings: On August 8, 2024, at 12:58 p.m., a concurrent interview and record review of the facility QAPI meeting was conducted with the Administrator (ADM). The ADM stated during the QAPI meeting on July 24, 2024, it was identified that resident rooms 22, 23, 24 and 25 had hot temperatures due to the facility central air conditioning (AC) units 4 and 5 breaking down on July 9, 2024. The ADM stated fans were placed inside the affected rooms and large coolers were placed in the hallway to help cool down the residents room temperatures. The ADM further stated the facility did not monitor or re-evaluate the effectiveness of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure education and resources regarding Advance Directive (AD - written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment) were provided to the residents and/or resident reresentatives, for three of eight residents reviewed for Advance Directives (Residents 40, 46, and 54). This failure had the potential for Residents 40, 46, and 54 and the resident representatives uninformed about AD which could result in the facility being unable to know and honor the residents' wishes regarding their medical treatment. Findings: On August 6, 2024, Residents 40, 46, and 54's medical records were reviewed and indicated the following: 1. A review of Resident 40's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included bipolar disease (a disorder associated with mood swings), anxiety (worry about future concerns) and schizoaffective (mental health condition). A review of Resident 40's Minimum Data Set (MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 32), the resident was able to voice a grievance without feeling uncomfortable. This failure had the potential for Resident 32's concerns to go unaddressed, leading to ongoing dissatisfaction and affecting the resident's quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 32's admission RECORD, indicated, Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included bilateral osteoarthritis of the knee (bone disease of both knees), fibromyalgia (chronic disorder that causes widespread pain in the body), dementia (disease characterized by loss of memory and language) and depression (feelings of hopelessness). A review of Resident 32's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated July 3, 2024, indicated Resident 32's Brief Interview for Mental Status (tool to assess cognitive function in residents) score was 15 (cognitively intact). On August 7, 2024, at 9:57 a.m., during the Resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication Carvedilol (medication used to treat high blood pressure) was administered as directed by the licensed nurse, for one of nine residents observed for medication administration (Resident 47). This failure has the potential for the resident to experience adverse effects of the medication if not taken as directed. Findings: On August 7, 2024, at 8:37 a.m., a medication administration observation was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3. LVN 3 prepared Resident 47's medication that included Carvedilol 3.125 milligrams (mg- unit of measurement). The instructions on the medication bubble pack indicated to give one tablet of Carvedilol 3.125 mg by mouth. The medication label included an instruction to give the medication with food. On August 7, 2024, at 8:50 a.m., LVN 3 administered Resident 47's medication including the one tablet of Carvedilol 3.125 mg. LVN 3 was observed to not have given food to Resident 47…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facilty failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was provided adequate training in the documentation of a narcotic pain medication administration for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 6 and 14). This failure has the potential to result in inaccurate assessment of the resident's pain and documentation of pain medication administration. Findings: On August 8, 2024, at 10:29 a.m., an observation, interview, with a concurrent record review was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. A narcotic medication reconciliation was conducted and the following were observed: a. Resident 14 had a medication bubble pack for the medication Oxycodone-Acetaminophen (narcotic pain medication that is controlled due to it's high potential for addiction) 10-325 milligrams (mg - unit of measurement) with a stock dose of 13 tablets. The medication count sheet for the Oxycodone-Acetaminophen 10-325 mg indicated one tablet was signed out on July 23, 2024 at 12:53 p.m., by LVN 1 and LVN 3. In a concurrent interview, RN 1 stated, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record, review, the facility failed to ensure the licensed nurse documented the medication Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (controlled drug pain medication) as administered for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 34). This failure resulted to the delay in the identification of drug discrepancies and possible medication diversion of controlled medications. Findings: On August 8, 2024, at 10:55 a.m., an observation, interview, and record review was conducted narcotic medication reconciliation was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis (type of degenerative joint disease that can affect joint tissues, usually manifested by pain). The Physician's Order dated March 12, 2024, indicated to give Norco Oral (brand name of narcotic pain medication) 5-325 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. The Medication Count Sheet indicated Licensed Vocational…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely dental services for one of nine residents, (Resident 21). This failure had the potential to lead to mouth pain, infection, and/or complications related to dental and nutritional needs for Resident 21 if left untreated. Findings: On August 5, 2024, Resident 21's admission RECORD, was reviewed. Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis (a central nervous system autoimmune disease, and anxiety disorder (a chronic condition characterized by an excessive and persistent sense of apprehension). A review of Resident 21's Care Plan, dated January 12, 2024, indicated, .Has oral/dental health problems r/t (related to) obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth . Coordinate arrangements for dental care, transportation as needed/as ordered, report to MD (physician) s/sx (signs and symptoms) of oral/dental problems needing attention . A review of Resident 21's Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure for one of one resident (Resident 54) a pest free environment when one fly was observed on resident 54's lunch meal. This failure had the potential to place Resident 54 at risk for food borne illness (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria) that can cause sickness and or death. Finding: On August 6, 2024, Resident 54's admission RECORD, was reviewed. Resident 54 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (partial or total paralysis on one side of the body), hemiparesis (partial paralysis or weakness), and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating due to disruption in cognition). A review of Resident 54's History and Physical indicated, Resident 54 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 54's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), dated May 23, 2024, indicated, Resident 54 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (a tool to assess cognitive function in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-13 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address a doctor's concern regarding ongoing weekly telephone appointment for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted for Resident 1 not receiving necessary care that he needed to achieve his highest level of physical well-being. Findings: During an interview on April 12, 2024, at 10:39 a.m., Resident 1 stated he had weekly phone appointments with a doctor, his therapist. Resident 1 stated it had been some time since his last session. Resident 1 stated the facility was aware of these appointments. During an interview on April 12, 2024, at 1:38 p.m., with the SS, the SS stated, she had spoken to Resident 1's doctor a few times. The SSD stated, she received an email from Resident 1's therapist on March 22, 2024, expressing concern about the lack of communication with the resident. During an interview on April 12, 2024, at 2:09 p.m., with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN), the LVN stated, the doctor was required to provide an order for appointments. The LVN stated, the SS was responsible for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's rights were respected, for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1), when the facility cordless phone was not accessible for private conversations. This failure increased the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's psychosocial well-being. Findings: On March 26, 2024, at 11:36 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for two complaint investigations. On March 26, 2024, at 12:04 p.m., Resident 1 was observed lying in bed on his cell phone. During a concurrent interview, Resident 1 stated his cell phone no longer worked to receive phone calls, but he continued to use it for internet access. Resident 1 stated he needed to use the facility phone to make and receive phone calls. Resident 1 stated the facility had a cordless phone, but it was not available for use. Resident 1 stated he had weekly phone calls with his doctor, and he was not able to receive the calls because staff stated the cordless…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interveiw and record review, the facility failed to: 1) Administer medications as prescribed to 3 out of 3 Residents (Resident 1,2 and 3). 2) Order controled drug Xanax (An anti-anxiety medication) and failed to assure the medication was made available to Resident 1 as per Physician orders. This failure had the potential to: 1) Subject Resident ' s 1, 2 & 3 to negative health effects, due to not receiving their medications, as prescribed by the physician. 2) Subject Resident 1 to untreated feelings of anxiety, and withdrawl side effects from anti-anxiety medication Xanax. Findings: On December 6th, 2023, an unannounced visit was made to the facility for the investigation of a quality-of-care issue. 1) A review of Resident 1 ' s facility admission records, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Generalized Anxiety Disorder (A mental health condition in which an individual experiences signs and symptoms of anxiety, such as fear, worry, sweating and pounding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse within 2 hours to California Department of Public Health (CDPH) after the allegation was made, for one of five residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in further abuse for Resident 1, affecting the resident's physical, emotional, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: On October 18, 2023, at 12:00 p.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a complaint allegation of abuse. A review of Resident 1's record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia, affecting left limb dominant side (inability to move one side of the body). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) dated October 26, 2023, the MDS indicated a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 5 (moderately impaired cognition). A review of Resident 1's Change of Condition, dated October 13, 2023, at 5:58 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, for one (Resident 1) of four residents, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1's care plans were reviewed and updated to meet the resident needs, and is made readily accessible for the staff to implement a consistent approach in keeping the resident free from fall and accident. The facility failure had resulted for Resident 1 to experience a fall when intervention in place was not meeting the resident's need to keep herself supervised, safe, and free from accident on July 27, 2023, at 2:22 a.m. Furthermore, the facility had failed to make Resident 1's care plan readily accessible to staff to provide a consistent approach in keeping Resident 1 safe and free from accident/injury. Findings: On October 18, 2023, at 1:15 p.m., an unannounced facility visit was conducted to investigated quality of care issue for allegation staff takes their break at the same time, causing the residents to be unattended and at risk for fall and accident. On October 18, 2023, a concurrent interview and care plan review were conducted with Director of Nursing (DON) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one (Resident 1) of four residents, the facility failed to ensure services that meet standards of care for resident supervision was met when Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA) went on a break and had not properly endorsed Resident 1 was confused and disoriented. The facility failure had resulted for Resident 1 to fall on July 27, 2023, at 2:22 a.m. while CNA 1 was on her break. Findings: On October 3, 2023, at 9:30 a.m., an unannounced facility visit was conducted to investigated quality of care issue for allegation staff takes their break at the same time, causing the residents to be unattended. On October 3, 2023, Resident 1's record was reviewed. Resident 1's record indicated an entry made by Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN), on July 27, 2023, at 2:22 a.m., Resident's roommate (Resident 4) made staff aware that she (Resident 1) was on the floor. This writer checked on resident and found her laying on her left side on the floor next to the bottom of her bed. Upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, for one (Resident 1) of four residents, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1's psycho-active medications were reviewed to be kept at a minimum to prevent excessive doses and to minimize adverse consequences. The facility failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience potential risks (i.e., sedation) associated with over medication and duplication. Findings: On October 18, 2023, at 1:15 p.m., an unannounced facility visit was conducted to investigated quality of care issue for allegation Resident 1 was overly tired and ' dopey and had experience a fall and injury on July 27, 2023, at 2:22 a.m. On October 18, 2023, Resident 1's record was reviewed. The record indicated medications that included: * Ativan Oral Tablet (Lorazepam-a controlled substance, a sedative that can be used to relieve anxiety) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for Anxiety, order dated June 27, 2023, to July 7, 2023; * Dilaudid Oral Tablet MG (Hydromorphone HCl-controlled substance, it can treat moderate to severe pain) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when the facility failed to obtain the signatures for disposition of resident's belongings at discharge. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to lose personal property. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included left femur (thigh bone) fracture, dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities, and Alzheimer's disease (a type of dementia that affects memory, thinking and behavior). The record further indicated the resident's daughter as Power of Attorney (PoA). A review of Resident 2's Resident Inventory of Personal Effects indicated the resident's personal effects were inventoried on admission. The form further indicated a signature of the resident at admission. The form indicated a signature of the resident or responsible party at discharge. The form did not indicate a signature of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility did not record input for Resident 1. This failure had the potential to cause fluid imbalance for Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and gastrostomy (opening into the stomach). The record indicated Resident 1's sister, as the responsible party. A review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated August 2, 2023, indicated a score of 5 (severe cognitive impairment). A review of Resident 1's Swallowing/Nutrition Status assessment dated [DATE], indicated the resident is receiving 51% or more of her nutrition via feeding tube. The assessment indicated the resident's average fluid intake was 501 cc/day or more. On September 11, 2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse within 2 hours to California Department of Public Health (CDPH) after the allegation was made, for one of four residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in further abuse for Resident 1, affecting the resident's physical, emotional, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: On September 26, 2023, at 8:50 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate an allegation of abuse. A review of Resident 1's record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Diabetes Mellitus (high blood sugar levels). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) dated September 26, 2023, the MDS indicated a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 9 (moderately impaired cognition). A review of Resident 1's Behavior Note, dated September 21, 2023, at 5:04 p.m., indicated, .RN notified that resident verbalized to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's room temperatures were maintained at a comfortable level (between 71-81 degrees) for 15 out of 32 rooms, when the rooms were found with temperatures above 81 degrees. This failure had the potential for the residents to feel uncomfortable and had the potential to increase the risk of dehydration and heat exhaustion in an already vulnerable population. Findings: On July 28, 2023, at 2:23 p.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for a complaint the facility temperature was 100 degrees inside. On July 28, 2023, Resident 2 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in her room, lights were observed off and a fan was on. During a concurrent interview, Resident 2 stated it was hot, too hot and had been for a couple of days. Resident 2 stated staff have been offering fluids and ice. On July 28, 2023, at 2:41 p.m., all 32 facility rooms were temped with the maintenance supervisor (MS). 15 out of the 32 rooms temperatures were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure on personal belongings when: 1. Personal inventory forms were not completed for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2 & Resident 3); and 2. Resident's personal clothing items were not labeled. These failures resulted in the sample residents losing personal items and had the potential for the facility residents receiving laundry service to lose personal clothing. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Covid-19, muscle weakness, and cerebral infarction. The record indicated the resident was discharged to an assisted living on July 7, 2023. A review of Resident 1 ' s Resident Inventory of Personal Effects form did not indicate the inventory was signed by the resident nor the resident representative on July 7, 2023. The form indicated, I received on discharge the appropriate personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-11-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed when: 1. Six of six residents on a puree (smooth consistency foods) diet, received 1/3 cup of the meat but should have received 1/2 cup. 2. 11 of 11 residents on mechanical soft (a texture-modified diet that restricts foods that are difficult to chew or swallow) diet, received three ounces of meat and 1/3 cup of vegetable but should have received four ounces of meat and a 1/2 cup of vegetables. 3. Ten of ten residents on regular (not include any dietary restrictions) diet, received 1/3 cup of the vegetables but should have received 1/2 cup. 4. 24 of 24 residents with diabetes (chronic health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy) on CCHO (consistent carbohydrates for residents with diabetes) diet, received a dessert with sherbet instead of vanilla ice cream as specified on the approved recipe. These failures led to residents not getting enough food per the planned and approved menu which had the potential to lead to weight loss and further compromise the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-11-04 · tag F0813 — widespread
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were able to receive and consume food brought by family and visitors. This failure limited residents from enjoying favorite foods and reduced resident food options and choices that could lead to weight loss for a medically compromised population of 53 residents. Findings: On November 1, 2021 at 10:03 a.m., during an interview, the RD stated the facility did not allow outside food to be brought into the facility due to COVID-19 ( illness caused by a virus). She stated she was not aware of the federal regulation regarding food brought from home, and that she would coordinate with the Food and Nutrition Supervisor (FNS) to see how they could best meet the needs of the residents according to the regulation. On November 1, 2021 at 4:16 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Food and Nutrition Supervisor (FNS). The FNS stated the facility had not allowed food to be brought by visitors since March of 2020, because of COVID-19. On November 2, 2021 at 3:33 p.m., a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control program to prevent transmission of communicable disease and infection, when: 1. One licensed nurse was observed entering the PUI (person under investigation due to unknown COVID-19 [Corona Virus Disease 2019- an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, that can be transmitted from person to person]) room without appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE-gown, mask, shield/goggles, gloves and N95 mask, used in combination or alone). ; 2. The Treatment Nurse (TN) was observed donning and doffing gloves multiple times without performing hand hygiene in-between, while performing wound care to Resident 32's wound on the right heel. ; 3. One Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not perform hand hygiene before touching the medical device (nasal cannula) attached to the resident. In addition, the staff resumed assisting resident (Resident 154) with his meal, after touching the nasal cannula without conducting hand hygiene. These failures had the potential to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$76,434 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $62,810 — penalty dated 2025-05-14
  • $13,624 — penalty dated 2024-08-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SITANGGANG, NOVIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/15/2023
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/15/2023
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/15/2023
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/15/2023
MURRAY, JASONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/15/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$249K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 9%Medicare 7%Other / private 84%

This home reported $249K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$388per resident / day
operating cost
$11,784per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$394per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555319. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next