No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Peninsula Post-Acute

1609 Trousdale Drive, Burlingame, CA 94010 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 62 certified beds · (650) 652-3969 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (650) 652-3969 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 2022Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2022
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1720 El Camino Real · (650) 696-3680 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1750 El Camino Real · (650) 692-1686 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1825 El Camino Real · (650) 697-5306 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Ray Park0.3 mi
1525 Balboa Ave · (650) 558-7300 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.3%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.8%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.3%11.2%12.0%worse

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 587 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

68.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
92.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.45U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.74hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.60hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 92.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 177 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF68.1%CMS range 64.1–71.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 7.1–11.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge92.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge85.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge80.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge91.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.8%CMS range 5.9–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.241.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.68
RN hours/ resident / day
1.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.42
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.71
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.55
RN hoursweekends
36.9%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 58.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.95 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-27)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2022-02-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of 13 sampled residents (Residents 53 and 168) were free from neglect when: 1 . Resident 53 reported a staff was rude and failed to help him change out of his wet adult brief. As a result, Resident 53 still have ongoing unpleasant memory of this event and is fearful of working with this staff. 2. Resident 168's family requested pain medication from a nurse. This request was ignored for almost an hour while the Resident was in severe pain. As a result, Resident 168 continued to have severe pain for an hour. Findings: A thorough review of staff response to request for assistance was initiated during this survey due to two factors: i. There were three prior complaints alleging delay in staff response and/or substandard response to requests for assistance. ii. review of resident council meeting minutes for the last three months (November 2021 to January 2022) indicated slow response to requests for assistance may be a systemic issue. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff assessed and reported significant changes in condition for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) who experienced two documented episodes of tachycardia (fast heart rate). This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk for delayed recognition and treatment of an acute medical condition.Findings:Review of Resident 1's medical record titled admission Records, dated 11/21/25, indicated he had multiple active diagnoses including: metabolic encephalopathy (brain malfunction caused by imbalance in internal chemicals), pneumonia (lung infection), post kidney transplant (surgery to replace diseased kidney with donor kidney), end stage kidney disease (kidney failure and operating at around 15% capacity to filter body waste) and diabetes (body's inability to use and/or produce adequate insulin. Insulin= a hormone that regulates your blood sugar). During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/1/26 at 1:40 AM, the Social Service Director (SSD) was asked to search Resident 1's records for abnormal vital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were met for food storage in the kitchen when the kitchen did not document the initial temperatures for 3 food items on the cool down log. These failures were likely to result in putting residents at risk for foodborne illness (diseases caused by consuming contaminated food or drink).Cooling is the specific method and guideline used to rapidly lower the temperature of cooked food to a safe storage level, preventing bacterial growth. Improper cooling is a major factor in causing foodborne illness. Taking too long to chill potentially hazardous food, which means food that requires time/temperature control for safety to limit the growth of pathogens, has been consistently identified as one factor contributing to foodborne illness. Foods that have been cooked and held at improper temperatures promote the growth of disease-causing microorganisms that may have survived the cooking process (e.g., spore-formers). Cooked potentially hazardous foods that are subject to time and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a food storage area was pest free when rodent droppings were seen in a dry good storage area. This failure may expose residents to contaminated food items and/or expose residents to food borne illnesses.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview with the Director of Dietary (DOD) on 3/23/26 at 9:35 AM, four spring loaded snap type rodent traps were seen on the floor of the dry goods storage room. The DOD was asked if the facility had a rodent problem. The DOD stated she was unaware of any rodent problems in the kitchen and/or kitchen storage area. The DOD explained the rat traps may have been placed there by the pest management company as a preventative measure versus actual management of a rodent problem. Further inspection of a corner of the dry goods storage room revealed little round pellet like substances on the floor. There were approximately 12 of these black pellets. The DOD was interviewed about these pellets, and she agreed they looked like rodent droppings. Review of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an unusual occurrence for Resident 69, 1 out of 15 sample residents. Resident 69 had a fall and had neurosurgery (surgery to the brain) ten days later. Failure to investigate an unusual occurrence for Resident 69 did not ensure the facility had ruled out neglect and/or potential failures within their system for provision of nursing care. Findings:Review of Resident 69's medical records titled Progress Notes admission Summary, printed on 3/26/26, indicated upon admission on [DATE], she had multiple diagnoses including: dementia ( progressive loss of memory, language, reasoning, and other thinking skills), glaucoma (buildup of pressure within the eye, leading to vision loss), repeated falls, abnormal gait and mobility (walking and getting around) and subdural hematoma (blood collecting between the surface of the brain and its outer covering usually caused by torn veins from a head injury).Review of Resident 69's medical records titled Change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to update a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 18) when facility staff continued to maintain Resident 18's urinary catheter care plan after the urinary catheter had been discontinued. This failure had the potential to result in care that did not reflect Resident 18's current needs and failed to support his highest practicable well-being.Review of Resident 18's admission Record, indicated Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including obstructive and reflux uropathy (a condition when urine flows backward from the bladder up to the kidneys) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, a noncancerous enlargement of the prostate gland) with lower urinary tract symptoms.Review of Resident 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 3/6/26, indicated Resident 18 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, MDS tool that measures resident cognition)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality when one of two sampled resident (Resident 18) received oxygen therapy outside the prescriber's order. This failure could potentially result in unnecessary treatment, and care that was not clinically indicated for Resident 18.Review of Resident 18's admission Record, indicated Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease that makes breathing hard), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen in the body), and syncope (passing out) and collapse.Review of Resident 18's oxygen care plan, initiated on 3/4/26, indicated interventions to change humidification and oxygen tubing.During an observation on 3/23/26 at 10:22 AM, Resident 18 was receiving oxygen at 2 liters per minute (lpm, unit that express flow rate) via nasal cannula (a medical device that provides supplemental oxygen to a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate administration of medication when nursing staff did not follow the prescribed medication order for one of three sampled residents (Resident 52). This failure resulted in prescribed dose not being administered and may not manage Resident 52's pain.Review of Resident 52's Physician Order, dated 3/3/26, indicated lidocaine (used for pain relief) 4% patch was to be applied to the lower back for pain. The order specified applying two patches to clean, dry skin at 9:00 AM, to be worn for 12 hours and removed at 9:00 PM.During a concurrent medication pass observation and interview on 3/25/26 at 9:41 AM, an unlabeled patch was observed on Resident 52's back. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 was then observed removing the old patch and applying a new lidocaine 4% patch, labeled with date, to the same area on Resident 52's back. When asked how many patches were applied, LVN 2 stated, one. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/25/26 at 1:59 PM with LVN 2, Resident 52's electronic health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications (drug or medicine, used to diagnose, cure, treat, or prevent disease) and biologicals were properly stored when one of one sampled medication storage room refrigerators contained an opened and undated multi dose vial (a small bottle of medication that contains more than one dose) for Resident 41.This failure had the potential to result in the use of unsafe and expired medication for Resident 41. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 11:20 AM with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), an opened and undated multi dose vial for Novolin N (an intermediate-acting insulin [a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication] used to treat diabetes) for Resident 41 was found in the medication storage room [ROOM NUMBER]'s medication refrigerator. The ADON stated the multi dose vial should have been dated when the medication was opened to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a safe and sanitary environment when: 1. The fish served was not cooked to the appropriate temperature; 2. The fish was not thawed properly; 3. The resident's refrigerator contained unlabeled, undated and expired items; 4. Proper hand hygiene and glove use was not followed; 5. The microwave was not clean; 6. The plate warmer was not clean; and 7. The food carts were not cleaned appropriately; These failures had the potential to result in contamination of food, food preparation equipment, and utensils used for food, leading to food borne illness (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods) for 56 residents who received food from the kitchen. 1. During a kitchen observation on 10/14/24 at 12:02 PM, the Dietary Supervisor (DS) removed a pan of fish from the oven and placed a piece of fish on a plate for a resident's lunch. The tray holding the resident's plate was placed in the cart to serve to the resident. DS stated the fish…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent (5%) when 10 medication errors occurred out of 40 opportunities during the medication administration for four residents (Resident 53, Resident 43, Resident 219, and Resident 24, resulting in an error rate of 25%. 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 did not observe Resident 53 take her medications after leaving seven (7) of the prescribed medications on the bedside table. 2. Registered Nurse (RN) 1 administered Resident 43's Repaglinide (used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus [high blood sugar]) during meals. 3. Insulin was not administered according to professional standard of practice for Resident 219 and Resident 24. In addition, insulin was administered without a prescribed blood sugar check for Resident 24. These failures resulted in medications not given according to the prescriber's orders and/or manufacturer's specifications and had the potential for residents not receiving the full therapeutic effects of the medications. Findings: 1. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were labeled and stored according to manufacturer's instruction and facility policy and procedure; expired biologicals were removed from the active storage area; and medication cart was locked when left unattended. These deficient practices had the potential to compromise the integrity and effectiveness of the drugs and biologicals; and may jeopardize the health and safety of residents. Findings: 1A. During an observation on 10/14/24 at 10:25 AM, in resident's room, a medicine bottle was observed in plain sight in Resident 52's bedside drawer. The medication bottle indicated, FETILIDE 500 MCG (Generic for Dofetilide) ., a medication used to treat an irregular heartbeat (arrhythmia). During concurrent interview, Resident 52 stated she had asked the doctor to have her keep this medication at the bedside so she can take it on time to prevent her heart rate to increase. During concurrent interview and record review on 10/16/24 at 3:31 PM, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were plated in accordance with the approved menu when the incorrect scoop size was used for serving green beans to residents for a lunch meal. This failure to follow the planned menu had the potential to result in residents' diets not being given in accordance with the prescriber's order and diet specifications, resulting in residents not receiving the amount of nutrients to meet their nutritional needs to 49 residents who received regular textured green beans according to the menu and the lunch tray tickets. Findings: Review of the facility provided document titled Fall Menus spreadsheet dated 10/14/24, showed the serving size for regular textured Southern [NAME] beans was ½ cup. According to the facility's lunch tray tickets dated 10/14/24, showed 49 residents had a diet allowing regular textured green beans and did not have a dislike for beans/green beans. Review of the undated facility document titled Scoop Measurements, showed the gray color scoop (number 8) measures ½ cup, and the green…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide palatable food for a lunch meal including: 1. Meatballs; and 2. Pureed green beans. The failure to provide palatable food had the potential to reduce residents' food and nutrient intake leading to weight loss and/or nutritional medical complications for 34 residents who received meatballs or pureed green beans according to diet orders on the lunch meal tickets out of 56 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. Review of the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled Meal Service dated 2023, showed the Food and Nutrition Services staff member will take the food temperature prior to service of the meal with a thermometer. It may be necessary to take the temperature in more than one location on the food item to confirm the proper temperature has been reached. The food temperatures will be recorded. The minimum hot holding temperature on steam table is 140 degrees F. Temperatures of the food when the resident receives it is based on palatability. The goal is to serve hot food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0840 — pattern
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to furnish a completed written agreement for dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) services or transportation to dialysis that was being provided by an agency outside the facility. This failure has the potential for residents that require dialysis to not have services held to a standard agreed upon by the facility. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/15/24 at 9:50 AM with the Administrator, a document titled INTERNAL AGREEMENT REQUEST PREP FORM NURSING HOME DIALYSIS TRANSFER AGREEMENT, dated 05/18/21. The documented indicated that This Agreement type is for nursing home residents who are transferred from a nursing home to a chronic dialysis facility for treatment .Once approved, agreement sent for signatures; you will receive a copy once all parties sign. The Administrator stated this is a request for an agreement but not an actual contract. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/15/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a written medical order that specifies the types of medical treatment a patient wants to receive in the event of a serious illness) was obtained on admission for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 219). This failure had the potential to result in resident's wishes in an emergency situation and end-of-life choices not being honored. Findings: Review of Resident 219's admission record indicated, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of head and neck of left femur (a break in the bone that connects the femoral head to the femoral shaft in the hip), abnormalities of gait and mobility (changes to a person's normal walking pattern), type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), and hypertension (high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately encode one of 18 sampled residents' (Resident 20) Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) when Resident 20 was encoded has being diagnosed with Depression, but the Resident had no current or past medical history of that diagnosis. This failure has the potential to result in MDS assessments that inaccurately captures quality metrics and a resident's condition over time. Findings: A review of Resident 20's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), dated 10/18/24, indicated that Resident 20 was admitted 2024 with multiple diagnoses including SPINAL STENOSIS (when the space inside the backbone is too small causing pressure and pain) and LOW BACK PAIN. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/17/24 at 2:31 PM with the MDS Director (MDSD), Resident 20's list of active diagnoses, dated 10/17/24, was reviewed. The list of active diagnoses indicated all the conditions that Resident 20 was being treated or cared for.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an accurate comprehensive care for two of 18 sampled residents (Resident 20 and Resident 31) when: 1. Resident 20's care plan for Duloxetine (an anti-depressant medication that can also be used to treat nerve pain) had the incorrect indication (reason to give a medication) 2. Resident 31's care plan for indefinite use of Cephalexin (an antibiotic) was not developed. These failures have the potential for residents' care plans to not be person-centered and specific enough for residents to meet their medical and physical needs. Findings: 2. A review of Resident 20's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), dated 10/18/24, indicated that Resident 20 was admitted 2024 with multiple diagnoses including SPINAL STENOSIS (when the space inside the backbone is too small causing pressure and pain) and LOW BACK PAIN. A review of Resident 20's Order Summary Report (a list of a medical provider's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and treatment according to facility policies and procedures and professional standards of practice for two of 18 sampled residents (Resident 291 and Resident 24) when: 1. Insulin (a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication) injection was not prepared and administered according to current professional standard of practice and facility's insulin administration policy and procedure for Resident 219 and Resident 24. 2. Glucose (blood sugar) reading for Resident 24 was obtained during meals. Additionally, insulin was administered without a prescribed glucose check for Resident 24. These failures resulted in a medication error and had the potential to affect the absorption rate and efficacy of the insulin which could result in serious complications for Resident 219 and Resident 24. Findings: During medication pass observation on 10/15/24 at 12:13 PM, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 prepared to administer 4 units of Humulin R…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 26) had the necessary language systems for translation accessible when Resident 26 requested a translator but multiple staff were not aware of resources except for family or the use of a communication board (a tool that helps people with limited language skills express themselves by pointing to images or symbols). This failure has the potential for staff to not properly assess residents who speak a different language or make it difficult for a resident to make their unique needs known. Findings: A review of Resident 26's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), dated 10/18/24, indicated that Resident 26 was admitted in 2024 with a primary language of Japanese. During an interview on 10/15/24 at 12:10 PM with Resident 26, Resident 26 stated that their English was not good, and they requested an translator to continue the interview. A review of Resident 26's Medical Practitioner Narrative Note titled, PHYSICAL…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor for behavioral symptoms, side effects and/or adverse consequences for one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 220) on psychotropic (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications. Additionally, the informed consent for the use of psychotropic medication was signed seven days after Resident was admitted to the facility. This failure had the potential to place residents on psychotropic medications at risk for adverse health consequences which could negatively impact the resident's mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 220's admission record indicated, was admitted to facility on 10/10/24 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage) of right ankle and foot, schizophrenia, (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM - high blood sugar).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that one of 18 sampled Residents (Resident 269) was free of significant medication errors when Resident 269 was given Acetaminophen (a pain medication) beyond the parameters ordered by the medical provider. This failure has the potential to lead to Acetaminophen adverse effects (undesired effect of a drug) including abdominal pain, nausea/vomiting, or liver damage. Findings: A review of Resident 269's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), dated 10/18/24, indicated that Resident 269 was admitted in 2024 for multiple diagnosis including Fracture, Left femur (break in the upper leg bone) and Fracture .of left humerus (break in the left upper arm bone). A review of Resident 269's medication administration record (MAR, a daily documentation record used by a licensed nurse to document medications and treatments given to a resident), dated 10/17/24, indicated that Resident 269 had two orders for Acetaminophen. The first order indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure one kitchen staff competency for manual warewashing (warewashing: cleaning and sanitizing of utensils and food-contact surfaces of equipment) using the three-compartment sink. The failure to ensure staff competency for 1 of 8 kitchen staff regarding manual warewashing had the potential to result in contamination of food and/or utensils and equipment leading to illness caused by pathogens (harmful organisms). Findings: Review of the policy and procedure titled 3-Compartment Procedure for Manual Dishwashing, dated 2023, showed if the dish machine is not working properly manual dishwashing will be initiated. All items should be rinsed, scraped, or soaked before washing. The first compartment is used for washing. Fill the first compartment with detergent and hot water. The second compartment is used for rinsing. Fill the sink with clean, clear hot water, 110 -120 degrees Fahrenheit (F, temperature scale) and the temperature should be recorded. Items should be thoroughly rinsed to remove…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's electronic medical record was designed to provide physicians with diet order selections, for residents with renal (kidney) insufficiency/failure, that was consistent with current standards of practice and terminology used by the approved diet manual of the Food and Nutrition Services Department. This failure had the potential for 3 residents (Resident 34, 43, and 54), out of a facility census of 56, who were prescribed a Renal diet (a diet aimed at keeping levels of fluids, electrolytes, and mineral balanced in the body in individuals with chronic kidney disease or who are on dialysis) to receive inappropriate nutrient levels for their individual medical status. Findings: Review of the facility Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Therapeutic Diets revised 2017, showed the terminology of physician ordered diets should match the terminology used by the Food and Nutrition Services department. Review of the facility's 2023 Diet Manual for Long Term Care Facilities showed it was approved by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0836 — isolated
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operate and provide services to residents of 62 beds when the facility exceeded that capacity and reached 63-64 beds for 13 days in September, 2024. The facility failed to provide services to 62 residents when they admitted 63-64 residents. Findings: Review of a Detailed Census Report for September, 2024 showed 63 residents were admitted on Sept. 1, and 2nd. 64 residents were admitted on Sept. 4, and 9th. 63 residents were admitted on Sept. 15, and 16th. 64 residents were admitted on Sept. 19, and 23rd. 63 residents were admitted on Sept. 24, and 25th. 64 residents were admitted on Sept. 26th. 63 residents were admitted on Sept. 27, and 29th. The facility had admitted 63-64 residents for 13 days in a facility licensed for 62 beds. Review of facility license titled, State of California, Department of Public Health in accordance with applicable provisions of the Health and Safety Code of California and its rules and regulations, the Department of Public Health hereby issues this License to facility, to operate and maintain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow infection control standards for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 19) when Physical Therapist (PT) 1 and Occupational Therapist (OT) 1 were observed providing care without the necessary personal protective equipment (PPE, clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) used for a resident on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP, an approach where PPE is used during high contact resident care activities to reduce spread of drug-resistant organisms). This failure has the potential to spread infection in the facility or cause infection to a resident that is at higher risk for acquiring an infection. Findings: A review of Resident 19's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), dated 10/18/24, indicated that Resident 19 was admitted in 2024 with multiple diagnoses including QUADRIPLEGIA (paralysis from the neck down, including legs, and arms, usually due to a spinal cord injury) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-29 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respond in a timely manner to a request for medical records for Resident 1, 1 of 1 sample resident. Failure to provide requested medical records in a timely manner violated Resident 1's right to access her medical records. Additionally, the facility's policy of subjecting residents to a wait of 30-60 days before providing a copy of their medical records does not meet the regulatory definition of timely provision of medical records upon request. Findings: During an interview on 04/25/2024 at 12:16 PM, the Complainant stated she faxed a medical record request to the facility on [DATE] and followed up with two voicemails on 04/05/2024 and 04/08/2024 asking about the requested medical records. The Complainant stated as of today (36 days later), she still has not received the requested medical records for Resident 1. Nor has the facility contacted her regarding her request. The Complainant then provided this Department with a copy of a medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) completed an assessment to 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, and 4) when the residents had a change in condition. The deficient practice had the potential for harm on the resident's safety and well-being. Findings: A review of the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including left ankle wound, congestive heart failure (when the heart does not pump as strong as it should) and osteopenia (weakened bones). During an interview on 2/27/24, at 3:02 PM, Occupational Therapist (OT, help people recover from injuries to regain abilities to perform daily activities) she responded after hearing a scream and saw Resident 1 upside down, hanging from the hoyer lift. During an interview on 2/27/24, at 3:06 Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 stated, I was called to the resident's room. The OT was already there, and the resident was already lowered on the floor. LVN further stated that after completing assessment to Resident 1, he decided that Resident 1 can be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent an injury to one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) when Resident 1 hit her head during the transfer from the wheelchair to the bed. The facility failure resulted to resident to experience severe pain and sustain a bump on the back of her head. Findings: A review of the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including left ankle wound, congestive heart failure (when the heart does not pump as strong as it should) and osteopenia (weakened bones). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standard assessment tool) dated 3/30/23, Brief interview of mental status (BIMS, a brief memory test to help determine cognitive functioning [thinking, learning, and decision- making abilities]) score of 5 indicated severe cognitive impairment (rarely/never make decisions). Resident 1 required extensive assistance with one-person physical assist to perform activities of daily living including bed mobility, transfer, personal hygiene, and toilet use. Resident 1 was non ambulatory (unable to walk).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-02-18 · tag F0800 — widespread
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the hospital menu met the nutritional needs in accordance with the Medical Director (MD) approved diet manual, physician ordered diets and current standards of practice. This failure resulted in diets not given in accordance with the prescriber's order and diet specification which may result in resident's not receiving food to meet their nutritional needs and/or receiving food that may worsen their clinical conditions. The lack of comprehensive nutritional analysis, in general, affected 47 residents who were receiving meals from the kitchen. Additionally, of the 47 Residents receiving meals there were 19 Residents with physician ordered carbohydrate consistent diets and eight Residents with chopped diets who did not receive meals in accordance with standards of practice. There were also 14 Residents with physician ordered cardiac diets, however the cardiac diet was not part of the facility's Medical Director approved diet manual. Findings: Diet manuals establish a common language and practice for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on food production observations, dietary staff interview and dietary document review the facility failed to ensure food was stored and/or prepared in a sanitary manner when there were 1) lapses in infection control, 2) lack of comprehensive cooldown monitoring of potentially hazardous foods prepared from ingredients at room temperature; 3) improper washing/sanitation of food service equipment; 4) ineffective sanitizer strength; and 5) storage of unlabeled and/or undated items. This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for foodborne illnesses (any illness resulting from the consumption of foods contaminated by bacteria, viruses, or parasites). Findings: 1. During a tray line observation, on 2/14/22, at 12:15 PM, in the kitchen, [NAME] 1 (C1) was observed preparing meal trays. C1 was wearing a black smock (a loose garment worn over street clothing) unbuttoned in the front. Parts of C1's smock was observed touching the plated food when C1 was plating the food to the meal trays. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff upheld a resident's right to be treated with dignity for three of 13 sampled residents (Residents 53, 168, and 24) when: 1. Staff did not answer Resident 53's request for assistance in a timely manner and when staff did not assist Resident 53 with incontinence care. (Refer to F600) 2. Staff did not provide pain management intervention(s) to Resident 168 in a timely manner when requested by a family member and staff did not provide incontinence care in a timely manner. (refer to F600) 3. Staff did not to assist Resident 24 with incontinent care in a timely manner. Failing to treat each residents with dignity had the potential to make them feel unwanted, depressed, and not respected. Findings: A thorough review of staff response to request for assistance was initiated during this survey due to two factors: i. There were three prior complaints alleging delay in staff response and/or substandard response to requests for assistance. ii.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment when the Communal Shower Room (CSR) 2 had peeled and torn non-skid strips. This failure posed a safety risk that may result in injuries to the residents and staff. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, with the Environmental Services Director (ESD) on 2/16/22 at 11:46 AM, there were dark-colored strips installed at the entrance, in front of the toilet bowl, and beside the bathtub in the CSR 2. The strips had areas that were torn and peeled off. The ESD stated, I want that removed (damaged strips) because it's hard to clean across the lifted areas. I feel like patients could trip if they come in with walker. The ESD also stated that the CSR 2 is used by the residents. During an interview, on 2/17/22 at 12:23 PM, the Maintenance Director (MD) stated that the dark-colored strips on the CSR 2 floor were non-skid strips. The MD stated he was aware of the torn and peeled non-skid strips. The MD also stated that if the non-skid strips were not fixed, It may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-18 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure effective Registered Dietitian (RD) oversight of food services when there were lapses in safe food handling standards of practice, and independent evaluation of food service operations. Lack of a Registered Dietitian's oversight may result in 1. consumption of contaminated food, 2. provision of inadequate nutrition to residents, 3. Provision of incorrect food texture or 4. an increase in food related illnesses (Cross Reference F800, F812 and F880). Findings: 1. During observations, on 2/14/22, at 11:55 AM, C1 was seen using her right hand to open the door to the back of the kitchen. C1 then took off the glove on her right hand. C1 did not wash her hands and proceeded to put another glove on her right hand. During an observation, on 2/15/22, at 10:28 AM, in the kitchen, C1 was observed placing cucumber peels in the garbage can. After dumping the peels, C1 removed both her gloves. C1 did not wash her hands and proceeded to fold white towels. During an observation, on 2/15/22, at 10:40 AM, in the kitchen,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure meals were plated in accordance with the approved menu. This failure can result in diet not given in accordance with the prescriber's order and diet specification which may result in resident not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the resident nutritional need and/ or provision of inadequate nutrition to residents. Findings: During a tray line observation, on 2/14/22, at 12:15 PM, in the kitchen, Cook1 (C1) was observed plating resident lunch trays. The following was noted: a. Resident 61 with a physician ordered pureed liberal renal diet received mashed potatoes. Concurrent review of the therapeutic spreadsheet (a document used by kitchen staff to determine types and quantities of food to be plated for each diet) approved by the Registered Dietitian on 10/10/21 indicated renal diets should have received parslied noodles in place of potato. b. Resident 71 had a physician ordered carbohydrate consistent diet with twice the amount of protein at the noon meal. Resident 71's meal was plated as a diet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-18 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on meal plating observations, speech therapy interview and departmental document review the facility failed to ensure meal production was consistent with standards of practice when residents with orders for a chopped diet were served a regular hamburger that was cut in half. Additionally, the facility lacked specific diet manual guidance on what constitutes a chopped diet. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact nutritional intake for residents with limited range of motion of their hands/arms, and residents with chewing and swallowing deficits. Findings: During a tray line observation, on 2/14/22, at 12:15 PM, in the kitchen, [NAME] 1 (C1) was observed preparing a meal tray for Resident 38. The tray had a meal ticket for a regular chopped diet. C1 was observed cutting the hamburger patty in a bun in half. During an interview, with the Registered Dietician (RD) and the Dietary Manager (DM) on 2/15/22, at 1:37 PM, the RD stated, regular chopped diet is for residents who cannot cut regular meat on their own, with fracture or surgery on the arm. RD and DM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 did not perform hand hygiene before putting on and after removing gloves during resident care activities, and did not remove his gown before leaving Resident 28's room, who was under observation for COVID-19 infection; 2. CNA 3 did not perform hand hygiene before putting on and after removal of gloves; and 3. Two kitchen staff did not perform hand hygiene before putting on and after removing gloves. These deficient practices had the potential to spread infection to the residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: 1. During an observation on 2/14/22 at 12:44 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 was inside Resident 28's room, assisting the resident in using the commode (a portable toilet). CNA 2 was wearing protective personal equipment (PPE - equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illnesses) that include gloves and a gown. During further observation, CNA 2 picked up the basin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain patient care equipment in safe operating condition when: 1. Two drawers of infection control cabinet lack wheels and were resting on the floor, and one drawer had a cracked plastic top, which had the potential to contaminate the PPE (personal protective equipment) stored within the drawers and prevents staff from effectively sanitizing the outside of the drawers. 2. The water pressure gauge of the facility dishwashing machine did not exceed 12 PSI that was not within the manufacturer's recommended Pounds per Square Inch (PSI) of 15-25 PSI. This failure may decrease the dishwasher's effectiveness in cleaning dishes, utensils and other kitchen items. Findings: 1. During initial observation on 2/14/22 at 11:40 AM, an infection control plastic container/drawer was found without wheels on the floor outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. Another infection container was found without wheels on the floor outside room [ROOM NUMBER] on 2/14/22 at 2:52…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of neglect for three of 13 sampled residents (Residents 53, 168 , and 24) were reported within the prescribed timeframes, when the alleged incidents on 2/16/22 was reported on 2/18/22 to the required authorities. This failure had put residents at risk for safety. Findings: During an interview on 2/16/22 at 3:13 PM, the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were made aware of allegations of neglect regarding Residents 53, 168 and 24. The facility staff was made aware of the alleged residents' neglect on 2/16/22, and the facility reported the incident on 2/18/22 to the required authorities. Review of Resident 53's Progress Notes, dated 2/16/22 at 4:00 PM and 2/17/22 at 8:37 AM, indicated the facility was aware of allegations of neglect regarding call light response. During interview on 2/18/22 at 12:34 PM, the Administrator and Director of Nursing were asked to provide documented evidence these allegations of neglect were reported to the required authorities. The facility was unable to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for accurate provision of pharmaceutical services when: 1.Licensed staff failed to accurately reconcile metoprolol (a medication to treat blood pressure) for Resident 368, 2.Tramadol (a medication for pain that is regulated) 50mg (milligram) for Resident 60 was not accurately reconciled on control drug count sheet and medication administration record (MAR). These failures had a potential for Resident 368 to experience adverse effects, Resident 60 having unmedicated pain, and controlled substance discrepancy leading to diversion (stealing of medications). Findings: 1.During record review on 2/15/22, the MAR from Hospital 1 showed Resident 368 received metoprolol 25mg half a tablet by mouth two times a day or 12.5mg by mouth two times a day. A review of the Facility's MAR indicated Resident 368 had a physician order for metoprolol 25mg (milligram - a unit of measure) by mouth two times a day and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure one of 13 sample residents (Resident 74) was free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications when: 1. Abilify (antipsychotic medication to treat mental health issues) was administered without a specific condition that was diagnosed and documented in the clinical record and without documented behavioral interventions (individualized non - pharmacological approaches). 2. Celexa (a medication used to treat depression, a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and Abilify were administered as duplicate therapy (multiple medications for same diagnosis) for depression. These failures had the potential for the resident to receive unnecessary medication which increased the risk of preventable side effects and death. Findings: 1.Review of Resident 74's clinical record indicated that she was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label and store drugs in accordance with current professional standards for four of 13 sampled residents (70, 76, 81, and 82) when: 1.Ensure potentially expired medications were not available for use, 2.Properly label resident medications available for use with expiration date when applicable and in accordance with facility policy and procedures (P & P). These failures placed residents 70, 76, 81, and 82 at risk for receiving ineffective or expired medications and had the potential of exposing residents to infections due to cross contamination. Findings: 1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 2//14/22 at 12:11 PM of medication cart 3 at Station 3 with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, one opened vial of Lantus (medication for treating high blood sugar levels) 100 units/1ml (milliliter - a unit of measurement for liquid) 10 ml vial for Resident 76 was observed. The vial did not have a label attached that contained the date opened or an expiration date. RN 1 acknowledged the opened and undated vial and stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure meals were palatable (refers to the taste and/or flavor of the food, acceptable to the taste) when the pureed entrée for the noon meal lacked flavor and was not like the regular entrée. This deficient practice had the potential to affect resident's appetite which may result in poor dietary intake that could potentially compromise their health and nutritional status. Findings: During general dining observation, on 2/14/21 at 12:56 PM, It was noted Resident 4's tray consisted of a plain hamburger; stir fried vegetables consisting of grilled peppers and onions; watermelon and grape juice. Resident 4 refused the grilled vegetables stating they were Not tasty, cold, don't want to eat it. They were tasteless (referring to the vegetables). During a concurrent observation and interview, on 2/16/22, at 1:15 PM, with Registered Dietician (RD), a test tray was conducted in the hallway by the activity room area. The pureed beef stew did not taste like the regular beef stew. The RD tasted the pureed beef stew and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
PATEL, ADITIIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/01/2015
MITCHELL, HUNTERIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/01/2023
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$23.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+21.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 50%Other / private 50%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$817per resident / day
operating cost
$24,829per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$1,044per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the California Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555856. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next