Whitney Oaks Care Center
3529 Walnut Avenue, Carmichael, CA 95608 · For profit - Corporation · 126 certified beds · (916) 488-8601 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.9% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.9% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.7% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.2% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.1% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.33 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.00 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 132 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.2%CMS range 46.6–67.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 6.5–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 63.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 45.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 90.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 3.4–10.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 119.8 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.96 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
60 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect two of three sampled residents' (Resident 1 and Resident 2) right to be free from physical abuse when they were attacked by Resident 3. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to sustain a laceration (cut) to the left side of the head, a blunt head trauma injury, and chest wall contusion (bruising). Resident 2 sustained a laceration to the back of his head and multiple skin tears. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's face sheet, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cellulitis (skin infection) of left lower limb and congestive heart failure (CHF-heart can't pump enough blood). Resident 1 was his own responsible party. During a review of Resident 1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool), dated 6/24/24, the MDS described Resident 1 as able to make himself understood and able to understand others. Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a screening that aids in detecting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviews the facility failed to ensure a prompt resolution was provided for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1's Family Member (FM) filed a grievance for Resident 1's lost prescription glasses. This failure resulted in Resident 1's inability to see clearly.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses which included vascular dementia (a cognitive decline caused by restricted or blocked blood flow to the brain) and combined forms of age-related cataracts (multiple types of cataracts affecting both eyes due to the natural aging process).During a review of Resident 1's Inventory of Personal Effects, dated [DATE], the inventory indicated Resident 1 had a pair of glasses.'A review of the Theft and Loss Log Year 2025 indicated Resident 1's eyeglasses were reported as lost/missing on [DATE].A review of the Theft and Loss Record, dated [DATE] by Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, LN 1 reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that physician ordered wound care was provided as prescribed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 missed wound care for one day.Findings:Resident 1 was admitted in March 2025 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), bullous pemphigoid (autoimmune skin disease causing large blisters), diabetic ulcer (open sore in people with diabetes), bipolar disorder (extreme mood swings) and obsessive compulsive disorder (general pattern of concern with orderliness, perfectionism, and control). Resident 1 had a history to refused wound care from other nurses unless it was provided by Treatment Nurse (TN) 2. A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 3/7/25 indicated, Resident has capacity to make her decisionsA review of Resident 1's Discontinued Order Summary indicated, Order date: 12/3/25 Start date: 12/5/25 Discontinued date: 12/19/2025 for the following treatment order:1. Tx [Treatment]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse for one of three sample residents (Resident 1) when Resident 2 and Resident 1 had a physical altercation. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a fall with an abrasion to forehead and broken nails.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted in October 2025 with diagnosis including complete paraplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation, to some degree, of the legs).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 10/14/25, indicated Resident 1 had no memory impairment. During a review of Resident 1's Nurse's notes, dated 11/29/25, indicated Resident 1 .noted with altercation with a male resident (Resident 2), noted pt (patient) lying down on the floor and holding the left leg of the male resident, near the patio door on hallway 300. Noted with small abrasion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rights were respected and honored for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 did not initiate interventions to allow Resident 1 to go safely out on pass with a family member.This failure had resulted in Resident 1 not able to go out and have dinner on thanksgiving weekend with her family, and had the potential to negatively impact residents' psychosocial well-being.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in late 2024 with multiple diagnoses which included major depressive order and general anxiety. Resident 1's clinical record indicated Resident 1 had no memory impairment.Resident 1 submitted a complaint via email to California Department of Public Health on 11/30/25 at 4:29 a.m., which indicated Resident 1 had planned on going out with her son to celebrate thanksgiving dinner but was denied by the facility. During a review of Resident 1's Nurse's note dated 11/29/2025 at 1:59 p.m., indicated, Noted resident's son.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-23 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of five sampled residents (Resident 1's) right to send and receive mail was protected when it withheld Resident 1's mail for a period of seven months.This failure had the potential to cause emotional distress such as social isolation, missed important matters, and distrust in care for Resident 1.Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in March of 2025 with diagnoses that included depression.During an interview on 9/22/25 at 12:51 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 indicated that she had been waiting for important letters from her insurance and law enforcement that were of significance to her and caused her to worry. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/22/25 at 3:59 p.m., with the Activities Director (AD), Resident 1's Order Details, dated 3/7/25, was reviewed. The Order Details indicated, Resident has capacity to make her decisions. The AD indicated that Resident 1's mail was being withheld by activities staff since March of 2025, since they believed Resident 1 did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services according to professional standards of quality for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was not administered glipizide (a medication used to control high blood sugar levels in adults with type 2 diabetes) as prescribed by the physician.This failure had the potential to cause Resident 1 to experience uncontrolled blood sugar levels, which could result in complications such as vision impairment and/or nerve issues related to poor blood sugar control.Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in March of 2025 with diagnoses that included type two diabetes (a chronic condition that causes a person to have persistently high blood sugar levels).A review of Resident 1's Order Details, dated 3/7/25, indicated, glipiZIDE Oral Tablet 2.5 MG [milligrams, a unit of measurement] Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for DMII [type two diabetes] TAKE 30 MINUTES BEFORE MEALS AND HOLD IF BLOOD GLUCOSE IS LESS THAN 100During an observation on 9/23/25 at 8:21 a.m., during a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of care for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1's pain was not assessed and managed, and Resident 1's Responsibility Party (RP) did not receive communication regarding Resident 1's change in condition from the physician. These failures resulted in a delay in determining that Resident 1's cause of pain was due to a fracture of the right leg. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with multiple diagnoses including fracture of lower end of right femur (thighbone), nondisplaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur (hip fracture), diabetes (too much glucose in the blood), dementia (loss of memory and other thinking abilities), and failure to thrive (inability to sustain weight due to poor nutrition).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 5/14/25, indicated Resident had a Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident abuse prevention training was sufficient for one out of three sampled facility staff (Certified Nurse Assistant [CNA] 4).This failure had the potential for an ineffective resident abuse prevention program of the facility making facility residents at risk for abuse.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/15/25 at 1:30 p.m. with the Administrator (Adm), the facility's training in-services binder was reviewed. The Adm confirmed that the most recent abuse prevention related training of CNA 4 was on 3/12/24 which was more than a year ago.A review of CNA 4's PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN (PIP), dated 4/10/24, indicated, Management received a report that the employee [CNA 4] has made comments and actions towards [sic] other employees in an inappropriate and harmful sexual manner. - Reports claim that the employee made unwarranted and undesired comments towards another employees body. - Reports claim that the employee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation by Resident 1 of verbal abuse to The Department within the regulatory timeframe. This failure had the potential to put Resident 1 at risk of abuse if not investigated by The Department. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with multiple diagnoses including polyneuropathy (nervous system disorder that impacts nerve function in multiple areas of the body), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breathe), schizoaffective disorder (mental health condition that is a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorder), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (a deficiency of both calories and protein causing nutritional deficiencies), and cannabis use and stimulant abuse. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 2/11/25, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, served, or distributed in accordance with professional standards of food served safety when: 1. Several various sizes metal pans were stacked wet at the clean and ready-to-use areas; 2. Found meats were not thawed in a proper procedure in the walk-in refrigerator; 3. The blade of the can opener was not well maintained; 4. Dietary Aide (DA) 1 was not able to verbalize the proper process of manual dishwashing by the 3-comparment sink; and, 5. Resident's food was not stored at safe temperatures in the resident's food refrigerators and freezers at the nursing stations. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness in a highly susceptible population of 113 residents who consumed food from the facility kitchen and food from outside sources. Findings: 1. During an initial kitchen tour on 5/20/25 at 8:21 a.m., there were following food serving items found stacked wet and stored away at the clean and ready-to-use storage area: -four of half sheet metal pans -seven of 1/6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 49 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menu was followed for the therapeutic diets during lunch on 5/21/25 when: 1. Six residents (Resident 1, 11, 70, 85, 88, and 108) with small portion diets received three ounces (oz.) of meat instead of two oz.; 2. Six residents (Resident 16, 23, 49, 81, 82, and 112) with fortified diets did not receive planned fortified food; and, 3. 57 out of 113 residents who received lunch meals did not receive garnishes with their lunch meals. These failures had the potential to result in compromising the medical and nutrition status of residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. Findings: During the lunch meal distribution on 5/21/25 beginning at 11:49 a.m., it was noted as follows: 1. During both interviews with [NAME] (CK) 1 and CK 2 on 5/21/25 at 11:55 a.m. and 12:35 p.m., CK 1 and CK 2 confirmed and stated all the regular roast beef they prepared were three oz. per serving (slice). During the meal distribution, it was noted six residents (Resident 1, 11, 70, 85, 88, and 108) with small…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when: 1. The licensed nurse (LN) did not perform hand hygiene (HH, washing hands with soap and water or use of an alcohol-based sanitizer) in accordance with standards of practice during medication pass for Resident 6 and Resident 23; and, 2. Residents were not offered to clean their hands by staff prior to consuming their lunches in the dining room. These failures had the potential to result in transmission of infection to residents in the facility. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 5/20/25 at 8:40 a.m. with LN 2, LN 2 prepared medications for Resident 6 without wearing gloves or handwashing prior to preparation and administration. When asked if she wore gloves during the medication pass, LN 2 stated she could not remember. During a medication pass observation on 5/20/25 at 12:12 p.m., LN 1 picked up Resident 23's partially eaten meal tray from on top of a trash can without wearing gloves and left the room. LN 1 then returned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity and respect for Resident 61 when Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3) did not provide privacy to body after leaving Resident 61's room, and did not communicate with Resident 61 while providing care. These failures decreased the facility's ability to provide care in a dignified and respectful manner for Resident 61. Findings: A review of Resident 61's admission record indicated he was originally admitted in November 2020 with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and functional quadriplegia (inability to move legs and arms due to physical weakness). A review of Resident 61's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool), dated 3/3/25, indicated Resident 61's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score was 0 out of 15 with an inability to express ideas and make decisions. A review of Resident 61's Activity of Daily Living (ADL-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 64). Failure to accurately assess Resident 64's Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO, an organism that is resistant to multiple antibiotics) status resulted in an inaccurate record. Findings: A review of Resident 64's admission Record, dated 5/23/25, indicated, Resident 64 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), peripheral vascular disease (PVD - a slow progressive narrowing of the blood flow to the arms and legs), and Resistance to Multiple Antimicrobial Drugs. During a review of Resident 64's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated the presence of MDRO as an active diagnosis. During a review of Resident 64's Health Care Facility Transfer Form, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer a medication according to professional standards of quality for one of 34 sampled residents (Resident 23) when his insulin lispro (a fast acting insulin, medication to treat diabetes (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing)) according to the physician's order. This failure had the potential to cause poor glycemic (blood sugar) control which could lead to heart disease, nerve damage, kidney disease, vision loss, and foot problems. Findings: A review of Resident 23's medical record indicated he was admitted to the facility Fall 2022 with diagnosis which included diabetes. A review of Resident 170's clinical record included a physician's order dated 5/20/25, for insulin lispro 100 unit/milliliter (a unit of measurment) inject 8 unit subcutaneously (under skin) before meals for DMII (typle 2 diabetes). During a medication pass observation on 5/20/25 at 7:55 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 1(LN1), LN 1 was observed preparing 10 medications for Resident 23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure communication needs were met for one of 34 sampled residents (Resident 51) when communication materials were not available for use by the resident. This failure had the potential to impede Resident 51 from maintaining or reaching the highest practicable well-being. Findings: Resident 51 was admitted to the facility in April 2025 with diagnoses which included right femur fracture, and muscle weakness. Resident 51's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 4/28/25 indicated memory was severely impaired. The MDS also indicated Resident 51's preferred language was other than English. During a review of activities care plan for Resident 51 initiated 4/28/25, indicated Provide activity calendar in room .Provide activity materials like books, magazines, TV, radio, arts and crafts .in accordance with interests. During a review of Resident 51's Comprehensive Skilled Review Note dated 5/15/25, indicated .Language barrier-Russian speaking only. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/20/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 34 sampled residents (Resident 27 and Resident 220) received services to maintain nail care, good grooming, and personal hygiene for the use of neck brace device. This failure decreased the facility's ability to promote healthy nail growth and enhanced residents' appearance, overall well-being and to prevent skin irritation and potential infections. Findings: A review of Resident 27's admission Record (AR) indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included depression (serious medical illness that can significantly impact how a person feels, thinks, and acts), left sided body weakness and cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 27's Physician's Order (PO) dated 2/19/25, the PO indicated, Resident's Consult - Podiatry As Needed For Mycotic/Hypertrophic Nails And/Or Keratotic Lesions. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/20/25 at 4:18 p.m., Resident 27's right fingernails were long, jagged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 31) out of 34 sampled residents was provided nail care. This failure resulted in Resident 31's overgrown toenails and the potential to develop an infection or injury. Findings: A review of Resident 31's admission record indicated Resident 31 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses which included respiratory failure (inadequate gas exchange by the respiratory system) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/20/25 at 8:33 a.m. in Resident 31's room, Resident 31 indicated she had stated her toenails needed to be trimmed. An observation of Resident 31's toenails showed her toenails were long, past the edge of her toes. Resident 31 stated her toenails kept getting caught on her bed linens and was worried about scratching herself. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/22/25 at 11:06 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 6, in Resident 31's room, LN 6 observed Resident 31's toenails and acknowledged they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 34 sampled residents (Resident 102) indwelling catheter (IC, a type of urinary catheter designed to remain in place for an extended period to drain urine from the bladder) tubing was free from accumulated urine sediments. This failure decreased the facility's ability to prevent obstruction of the catheter's lumen, leading to reduced urine flow or complete blockage. Findings: A review of Resident 102's admission Record (AR) indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included urine retention and enlarged prostate (gland that produces some of the fluid) with lower urinary tract symptoms. A review of Resident 102's Physician's Order (PO) dated 5/12/25, the PO indicated: Indwelling [Brand Name] Catheter . # 18F [FR: French; catheter size]/10 ml [milliliter, metric unit of measurement] for diagnoses of obstructive and reflux uropathy; monitor every shift; cleanse with warm soap and water, rinse and pat dry; irrigate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 34 sampled residents (Resident 220) incentive spirometer (IS, a handheld medical device used to help patients practice taking deep breath, encouraging lung expansion to prevent respiratory complications) was available and provided as ordered. This failure decreased the facility's ability to help Resident 220's exercise his lungs to expand, strengthen, inflate, and clear mucus and other secretions after surgery. Findings: A review of Resident 220's admission Record (AR) indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cervical spinal fusion (a surgery that joins two or more vertebrae in the neck to create a stable, solid piece of bone). A review of Resident 220's Physician's Order (PO) dated 5/13/25, the PO indicated, Incentive Spirometer: three times per day for 10 days due to pulmonary dysfunction related to: PNEUMONIA [PNA, a lung infection where the air sacs (alveoli) fill with fluid or pus, making it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Destruction prescription medications according to facility policy and procedure (P&P); and, 2. The narcotic emergency kit (e-kit; a kit/box containing medications and supplies for immediate use during a medical emergency) was replaced according to facility P&P after use. These failures had the potential for abuse or misuse of medications and for emergency medications to be unavailable when needed. Findings: During an observation and interview on 5/20/25 at 8:52 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), LN 2 stated there was not a drug buster (a container to safely hold disposed drugs) available on her cart. LN 2 placed amiodarone (medication primarily used to treat heart rhythm problems) and another unidentified loose pill she found in the medication drawer inside a used latex glove and stored it inside the med cart. LN 2 confirmed there was not a drug buster located in her medication cart. LN 2 stated proper disposal of medications should be immediately in a drug buster and not in glove. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility's consultant pharmacist (CP) failed to identify drug-related issues on one of 34 sampled residents (Resident 170). This failure had the potential for unsafe medication use for all residents in the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 170's admission record indicated she was admitted in Spring 2025 diagnoses including anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities) schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), depression, diabetes mellitus II (disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and hyperlipidemia (having too much fat, like cholesterol or triglycerides in the blood) A review of Resident 170's clinical record included a physician's order dated 5/20/25, for quetiapine (an antipsychotic) 25 milligram (mg, a unit of measure), 1 tablet by mouth 12 hours as needed for agitation. A review of Resident 170's medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure opened multi-dose medications and biologicals were dated with an open and discard date, expired medications were not available for resident use, and single resident over-the-counter (OTC) products were appropriately labeled . These failures had the potential for residents to receive medications with unsafe and reduced potency from being used past their discard date, incorrect medications from inadequate labeling, and unsafe or ineffective medications or biologicals from inadequate temperature monitoring and storage. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/20/25 at 12:29 p.m. alongside Licensed Nurse (LN) 3, an inspection of Medication Cart 100 (Med Cart 1) identified two bottles of nitroglycerine (a medication used to treat chest pain). LN 3 confirmed the two bottles of nitroglycerine were not labeled with a pharmacy label. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/20/25 at 12:40 p.m. with LN 4, an inspection of Medication Cart 300 (Med Cart 3) identified one medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure resident safety for three residents (Resident 56, 76, and 114) out of 34 sampled residents when the call lights were out of reach. This failure had the potential for the residents to be unable to notify staff if there was an emergency. Findings: A review of Resident 114's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (muscle weakness to one side of the body) and diabetes mellitus (high blood glucose). During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/20/25 at 7:48 a.m. in Resident 114's room, Resident 114 could not locate his call light. Resident 114's call light was observed hanging over the right-side bed rail and laying under the bed, out of reach. Resident 114 confirmed he would not be able to notify staff if there was an emergency. A review of Resident 56's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with diagnoses which included quadriplegia (partial or complete loss of function in all four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment for the residents who used the dining area and residents who ate facility prepared meals when a bird cage containing 4 birds was not kept clean and sanitary, and was placed next to the walkway of the two (2) kitchen doors where food carts carrying resident meals pass through for a census of 118 residents. This failure had the potential to result in cross-contamination of facility prepared resident meals and could spread infection and/or other bird-related diseases to residents, facility staff, and visitors. Findings: During a telephone interview on 8/7/24 at 12:35 p.m. with Responsible Party (RP) 1, RP 1 stated, .They [facility] have birds in the dining area, near the kitchen door, and it's [bird cage] dirty. It's [bird cage] not clean, those [dirt] might get into their [residents] food . During an observation on 8/8/24 at 12:12 p.m., at the dining area during lunch mealtime, a black metal birdcage containing 4 birds was observed on the north side wall of the dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when the dose of Resident 1's Seroquel (Quetiapine Fumarate, a medication used to treat mental/mood disorders) was not given per physician's order. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 not having the desired effects of the medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in July 2024 with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (a disorder that causes intense changes in mood, energy levels and behavior). Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 had intact cognition. During a review of Resident 1's physician order, dated 7/2/24, the order indicated, Quetiapine Fumarate Oral [by mouth] 400 MG (milligrams, a unit of measurement) .Give 2 tablets by mouth at bedtime for BIPOLAR DISORDER M/B [manifested by] rapid mood cycling from pleasant to extreme anger. During a review of Resident 1's care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food preferences were honored for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2), when Resident 2 disliked broccoli but he was served broccoli during the lunch meal. This failure resulted in Resident 2's food preferences not being honored, and Resident 2 not receiving options for food of similar nutritive value. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission record, the record indicated Resident 2 was admitted in June 2024 with diagnoses that included transient ischemic attack (a temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain) and cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area). Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated Resident 2 had intact cognition. During a review of Resident 2's document titled, DIETARY INTERVIEW/PRE-SCREEN -V3.0, dated 7/12/24, the document indicated, IV. FOOD LIKES/DISLIKES .CHECK DISLIKES. ITEMS LEFT UNCHECKED INDICATE FOOD LIKES. The document further indicated broccoli and cabbage were checked under F.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility garbage dumpsters were not accessible to insects and vermin when the dumpster lids were not kept closed. This failure had the potential to harbor pests and other types of vermin capable of spreading disease for a census of 123. Findings: On 6/21/24 at 7:45 a.m., an observation of the facility's two (2) outside blue colored garbage dumpsters and 1 green colored recycling bin dumpster were found to be over filled. The two (2) blue colored garbage dumpster lids were not closed and sealed because it was overfilled with garbage. The recycling dumpster lid was also observed not closed because it was overfilled with cardboard boxes. The surrounding ground area around the garbage dumpsters were observed to be littered. During an interview with the Housekeeping Manager (HM) on 6/24/24 at 8 a.m., the HM was shown the two (2) blue colored garbage dumpsters and one (1) green colored recycling dumpster. The HM confirmed the lids were not covering the tops of the dumpsters because the dumpster were over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient supply of linens were available for staff to use during residents daily care for a census of 123. This failure decreased the facility's ability to provide care and services to enhance the self-esteem and self-worth of the residents. Findings: During the initial tour observation and interview with residents, on 6/18/24 at 10:19 a.m., one Resident stated that during the provision of care, there was linen shortage pretty much everyday that staff talked about. The Resident stated, she was worried how the facility was being ran. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 6/18/24 at 12:17 p.m., with Certified Nurse Assistant 7 (CNA 7), CNA 7 opened the linen storage #1 and heaved a heavy sigh and shook her head and she said nothing. CNA 7 stated linens will be filled out once delivered, but right now, there were no linens to use for the residents. Linen storage room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to be empty. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop baseline care plans for three out of 29 sampled residents (Resident 364, 366, and resident 320) when: 1. Care plans were not developed for the use of indwelling urinary catheters (flexible tube used to empty the bladder and collect urine in a drainage bag) for Resident 364 and 366; and, 2. Care plan for the use of a Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure machine (BiPAP, a device assisting in breathing) was not initiated withing 48 hours of admission. These failures had the potential for residents to not receive appropriate and timely care and treatment. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 366's admission record, the record indicated Resident 366 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe chronic kidney disease (severe loss of kidney function) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (prostate gland enlargement that can cause urination difficulty). During an observation on 6/18/24 at 9:57 a.m. in Resident 366's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop comprehensive, person-centered care plans for eight out of 29 sampled residents (Resident 48, 62, 94, 102, 103, 361, 364 and 366) when care plans were not developed for the use of indwelling urinary catheters (flexible tube used to empty the bladder and collect urine in a drainage bag), psychotropic medications and EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions). These failures had the potential for residents to not receive appropriate, adequate timely care and treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 366's admission record, the record indicated Resident 366 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe chronic kidney disease (severe loss of kidney function) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (prostate gland enlargement that can cause urination difficulty). During an observation on 6/18/24 at 9:57 a.m. in Resident 366's room, Resident 366 was observed lying in bed with a urinary catheter bag hooked to the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the activities care plan for 5 of 29 sampled residents (Resident 11, Resident 42, Resident 52, Resident 67, and, Resident 76) to reflect current person-centered interventions/tasks for a census of 123. These failures decreased the facility's ability to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions to improve the residents' physical and social well-being. Findings: 1. During a record review of Resident 11's Face Sheet (FS), the FS indicated Resident 11 had diagnoses which included depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and chronic respiratory failure (CRF, a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body). During a record review of Resident 11's physician's order (PO), dated 2/14/24, the PO indicated Resident 11 was admitted to hospice (a program that gives special care to people who are near the end of life and have stopped treatment to cure or control their disease).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and records review, the facility failed to provide proper respiratory care services for three residents (Resident 320, Resident 81, and Resident 42) of 29 sampled residents consistent with the professional standards of quality, the person- centered care plan, and the residents' choices when: 1. Resident 320's Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure machine (BiPAP, a device assisting in breathing) order did not provide specific pressure parameters and staff providing care were not trained in handling BiPAP equipment; 2. A respiratory care order and care plan was not followed for Resident 81; and, 3. Resident 42's order to use an incentive spirometer (a handheld medical device used to help patients, to take slow and deep breaths, facilitates lung expansion and strengthening) every waking hour was not implemented. These failures reduced the facility's potential to provide proper respiratory care services to Resident 320, Resident 81, and Resident 42, and increased the residents' risk of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately document and replace emergency medications (E-kit; a kit/box containing medications and supplies for immediate use during a medical emergency) for a census of 123. These failures resulted in the facility not having accurate accountability of emergency medications, the potential for emergency medications to be unavailable when needed, and the potential for not meeting the residents' therapeutic needs or worsening of their medical conditions. Findings: During an inspection on 6/18/24 at 10:33 a.m. of Medication Storage room [ROOM NUMBER], alongside Infection Preventionist (IP), a First Dose Emergency Kit Oral Medications was observed sealed with a red plastic tie indicating it had been opened by nursing staff. Inside the kit were six E-kit logs (a document completed by nursing staff whenever a medication is removed from the emergency supply), with the earliest entry into the kit documented on 6/9/24. One of the six logs was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 24.14% error rate when seven medication errors out of 29 opportunities were observed during a medication pass for three of four Residents (Residents 39, 43, and 96). This failure resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders and potential to affect the residents' clinical conditions. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 6/18/24 at 8:03 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 6 (LN 6), LN 6 was observed entering Resident 43's room to measure her blood sugar level. Resident 43 stated she had already eaten breakfast as LVN 6 performed the blood sugar test. LVN 6 then went to prepare eight medications, including Novolog (a rapid-acting insulin to treat diabetes), amlodipine (a medication to treat high blood pressure), and potassium chloride (a potassium supplement) extended release (ER, a long-acting formulation) for Resident 43. LN 6 looked inside the medication cart and stated she could not locate the Novolog and would follow up with the pharmacy. She placed Resident 43's prepared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 29 sampled residents (Resident 57) was free of a significant medication error when he received Lantus (a long-acting insulin, medication to lower blood sugar level) two times (doses) past the expiration date. This deficient practice had the potential for ineffective use of insulin, resulting in uncontrolled high blood sugar for the resident. Findings: During an inspection of Medication Cart 1 on [DATE] at 1:24 p.m. alongside Licensed Nurse 5 (LN 5), one vial Lantus for Resident 57 labeled with an opened date of [DATE] was identified. LN 5 confirmed the finding and stated Lantus expired 28 days after opening and confirmed it had expired on [DATE]. A review of Resident 57's medical record indicated a physician's order, dated [DATE], for insulin glargine (brand name: Lantus) 100 units/milliliter (units/mL, a unit of measurement), inject 10 units SQ (subcutaneous, under the skin) at bedtime for DM II (Diabetes type II, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Prepared medications were properly stored and administered at the time of preparation; 2. Expired and discontinued medications were not available for resident use; and, 3. Refrigerated medications were stored in accordance with facility policy & procedure (P&P). The deficient practices had the potential for residents to receive medications with unsafe or reduced potency from being used past their expiration date or improper storage, and diversion or misuse of medications from not being securely stored. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 6/18/24 at 8:45 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 6 (LN 6), LN 6 was observed administering ClearLax (a medication to treat constipation) to Resident 39. Resident 39 drank approximately half the ClearLax solution when LN 6 left the resident unattended with the remainder of the medication on her bedside table and moved onto preparing medications for the next resident. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: a) Food packages in the freezer were not tightly closed after use, leaving food exposed to the air; b) A red sanitizer bucket was found with insufficient sanitizing concentration only 2 hours after setting up, and several hours before the second shift staff would conduct the next check; c) Dietary staff were unable to correctly describe the 3-compartment sink set-up for manual dishwashing; d) Kitchen walls and ceiling had missing and/or peeling paint; and, e) Resident refrigerator had expired yogurt available for resident 86, and grapes kept for an unnamed resident, and the resident in that room was on a pureed diet. These failures had the potential of leading to food borne illness for the 125 residents eating facility provided meals. Findings: a) During the initial kitchen observation and concurrent interview on 6/18/24 at 8:12 a.m. in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide staff with the needed equipment to assist residents in safely accessing and consuming outside food when staff were unable to heat foods to correct serving temperatures. This failure had the potential of limiting food intake leading to malnutrition and/or weight loss, and/or leading to food borne illness for the 125 residents eating facility prepared meals. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview with Licensed Nurse 8 (LN8) on 6/19/24 at 9:40 a.m. at the Nursing Unit 2 resident refrigerator, LN8 stated that the resident microwave had been removed a while ago. When asked how staff would heat resident food, LN8 stated she was unsure how staff would do this, though believed some staff had used the staff microwaves in the breakroom. During an observation and concurrent interview of Register Nurse Supervisor (RNS) at Nursing Station 1 on 6/19/24 at 11:01 a.m., RNS verified that there was no microwave at the nursing station to warm resident food. When asked about heating resident food, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure: 1. Nursing staff maintained nails and performed hand hygiene (cleaning hands to prevent the spread of infectious disease) in accordance with nationally accepted standards of practice and facility policy and procedure (P&P); 2. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) were utilized for seven residents (Residents 48, 62, 102, 103, 361, 364 and 366) out of 29 sampled residents when staff did not follow infection prevention and control interventions; 3. Staff performed handwashing after handling soiled lenin; 4. Infection Prevention trainings and/or inservices were provided to staff after repetitive cases of urinary tract and upper respiratory infections were identified during infections surveillance; and, 5. The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) was reviewed annually. These failures had the potential to increase residents' risk of infection and the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO's) for census of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments were performed for two residents (Resident 33 and Resident 23) of 29 sampled residents when: 1.Resident 33's vision assessment was inaccurate; and, 2. Resident 23 did not have a change of condition assessment completed. These failures resulted in Resident 33 and Resident 23 not receiving accurate assessments reflective of their medical status and reduced the facility's potential to identify strengths to maintain or improve functional abilities. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 33's admission RECORD indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included legal blindness, presence of artificial eye, hearing loss, dementia (memory problems), and osteoporosis (bone disease that can lead to decrease in bone strength and increase the risk of fractures). During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/18/24 at 9:52 a.m., in Resident 33's room, with Certified Nursing Assistant 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide resident centered care for one resident (Resident 368) of 29 sampled residents when the facility did not ensure Resident 368's pressure relief heel boots were put on per comprehensive assessment, plan of care, physician's order, and Resident 368's choices. This failure decreased the potential for Resident 368 to receive effective treatment and necessary care. Findings: A review of Resident 386's admission RECORD indicated he was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included cellulitis (a deep infection of the skin caused by bacteria) of left lower limb, type 2 diabetes (high blood sugar) with skin ulcer, chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins (blood clot in the vein) of unspecified lower extremity, Charcot's joint (bone and joint fragmentation of the foot and ankle) unspecified ankle and foot, and localized edema (swelling). A review of Resident 368's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate care to maintain good foot health for one resident (Resident 261) of 29 sampled residents when Resident 261's toenails were dirty, long, and untrimmed. This failure reduced to facility's potential to provide appropriate foot care for Resident 261. Findings: A review of Resident 261's admission RECORD indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included diabetes, Alzheimer's Disease (memory problems), altered mental status, malnutrition, abnormal gait and mobility, and peripheral vascular disease (narrowed blood vessels reducing blood flow to the limbs). During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/19/24 at 8:35 a.m., Resident 261 was in bed and bilateral (both; in this instance, feet) toenails were observed to be dirty, long, and were untrimmed. Resident 261's conversation was incomprehensible, laughing without reason, and not able to provide meaningful conversation. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's bed rails were properly installed for one resident (Resident 13) when there was no informed consent and no physician order for bedside rail use. This failure had the potential to result in negative outcomes including accident hazards, physical restraint, decline in Activities of Daily Living and function, and psychosocial outcome. Findings: A review of Resident 13's admission RECORD indicated she was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included pain in left and right shoulders, fracture of upper end of right and left arms, and hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect arms, legs or facial muscles). Resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment tool), dated 4/23/24 indicated Resident 13 had no memory problems. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/18/24 at 9:02 a.m., in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have the Medical Doctor's (MD) notes signed. This failure had the potential for Resident 99 to received confusing, inaccurate, and inadequate care for a census of 123. Findings: Resident 99 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of Unspecified Dementia (a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), Major Depressive disorder, Disorientation. Review of Client 99's clinical records indicated the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] at 5:45 p.m. from the Acute Hospital. The Primary Medical Doctor (PMD) notes History and Physical (H/P) by the MD, indicated Resident 99 was seen by the MD on 3/21/23. There were no other MD notes for the months of April or May for review. During an interview with the Medical Records Director (MRD) on 6/21/24 at 10:15 a.m. the MRD confirmed there were no other MD notes from the computerized records that indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a newly admitted resident (Resident 99) was seen by the Medical Doctor (MD) once every 30 days for the first 90 days upon admission. This failure had the potential for Resident 99 to received inadequate and inaccurate care and assessment for a facility census of 123. Findings: Resident 99 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of Unspecified Dementia (a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), Major Depressive disorder, Disorientation. Review of Resident 99's clinical records indicated the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] at 5:45 p.m. from the Acute Hospital. The clinical records indicated the Primary Medical Doctor (PMD) notes History and Physical (H/P) by the MD, indicated Resident 99 was seen by the MD on 3/21/24. There were no other MD notes for the months of April or May to indicate Resident 99 was seen by the MD. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 94) out of 29 sampled residents was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications when Resident 94 was prescribed an order for buspirone (a psychotropic medication that affects the brain associated with mental processes and behavior) as needed for 14 weeks. This failure had the potential to cause medication interactions, confusion, and falls. Findings: During a review of Resident 94's admission record, Resident 94 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses including right femur (thigh bone) fracture and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 94's order summary, indicated the following medication order buspirone with a start date of 3/18/24, to be given every eight hours as needed for anxiety for 14 weeks, manifested by restlessness. During a review of the Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review, dated March 2024, the consultant pharmacist indicated Resident 94's order for buspirone needed a 14 day stop date for the as needed order. During a concurrent interview and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to promote dignity when one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) stated she had been pinned down and hit during care by two Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA 3 and CNA 4). This failure caused Resident 1 to be fearful and to feel she was being bullied and had the potential to affect the resident's self-esteem, self-worth, and diminish her quality of life. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis on one side of the body), muscle weakness, and right and left shoulder pain. A review of Resident 1's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 scored a 15 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a screening tool that aids in identifying cognitive ability), indicating she was cognitively intact. During an interview on 11/7/23 at 12 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated, I needed to have my brief (underwear) changed . it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and procedure (P&P) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when staff did not timely report an allegation that a staff member hit a Resident. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving an immediate assessment and interventions to ensure safety. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis on one side of the body), muscle weakness, and right and left shoulder pain. A review of Resident 1's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 scored a 15 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a screening tool that aids in identifying cognitive ability), indicating she was cognitively intact. During an interview on 11/7/23 at 12 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated, I needed to have my brief (underwear) changed . it was last week . around 4 in the morning while being cared for by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, revised September 2022, when the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical and verbal abuse towards one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by a certified nursing assistant (CNA 3). Resident 1 alleged CNA 3 yelled at her, punched her, and hit her with a cane. This failure had the potential to expose Resident 1 and other residents to abuse. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis on one side of the body), muscle weakness, and right and left shoulder pain. A review of Resident 1's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 scored a 15 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a screening tool that aids in identifying cognitive ability), indicating she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazards, when one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) had an ordered fall mat that was not on the floor. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to sustain a fall with injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to vascular dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents), dated 10/9/23, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status - BIMS, score of 3 (The BIMS test is used to get a quick snapshot of how well a resident is functioning cognitively at the moment and ranges from 0 - 15. A score of 3 indicates severe cognitive impact). During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written bed-hold information to a resident and resident representative for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) in a census of 116 when Resident 1 was sent to a general acute care hospital (GACH) and did not have any documentation they were given bed-hold information. This failure had the potential to decrease Resident 1's right to return to the facility. Findings: A review of the Resident Face Sheet, on 10/4/23, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in May 2022 and indicated Resident 1 was discharged to the emergency department one week after admission to the facility. During the initial tour of the facility on 10/4/23 starting at 11 a.m., Resident 1 was not observed residing in the facility. Review of the facility's census, dated 10/4/23, indicated Resident 1 was not listed as present in the facility. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/4/23 at 2:05 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed she was not able to find documentation of the bed-hold information given to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the health, safety and security of one of three residents (Resident 1) when the facility failed to report an alleged harm. This failure had the potential to endanger the health and well-being of all 117 residents in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in the winter of 2023 with diagnoses which included strain of muscle, fascia and tendon of lower back, contusion of left shoulder(bruising) and bladder neck obstruction (blockage of the urinary tubes). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 2/6/23, the MDS indicated the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status, an assessment tool), was 7, which reflected a severe knowledge and memory impairment. During a review of Resident 1's Occupational Therapy Progress Note (OTPG) 2/14/23 at 11:59, the OTPG indicated Resident [Resident 1] reported that the blonde OT hurt her arm earlier. Resident described performing bed mobility and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, resident privacy was compromised when tray tickets were thrown into the kitchen garbage. This failure had the potential of compromising resident information for 107 residents receiving facility provided meals for a census of 111. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 7/19/22 at approximately 9:30 a.m., Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) was washing the breakfast dishes. She removed the trays from the transport carts and threw food and resident meal tickets into the garbage which would later be emptied into the outside dumpster. The DA 1 stated nursing will usually destroy the tickets, but if they did not, she was to put them into a box under her manager's desk for shredding. The DA 1 also stated this was done to maintain resident privacy. In a subsequent interview on 7/19/22 at 9:40 a.m., the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) concurred tray tickets were not to be thrown in the garbage and should be shredded for privacy. During an interview on 7/21/22 at 8:51 a.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated the Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food preferences were honored for five residents (Resident 10, Resident 20, Resident 45, Resident 52, and Resident 160) for a census of 111. These failures had the potential to lead to poor intake, inadequate nutrition, and/or weight loss. Findings: During an observation of the lunch preparation on 7/20/22 at 10 a.m., [NAME] 1 made a taco casserole by adding onion and white beans to cooked ground beef. This was followed by mixing in tomato sauce and seasonings (chili powder, cumin and garlic). Once finished, it was put into a large pan, covered with flour tortillas and cheese to be baked. The lunch menu for 7/20/22 consisted of Taco Casserole, Zucchini, Fiesta Salad (containing beans and corn), and Fresh Fruit (containing honeydew and cantaloupe). Plain ground meat as well as breaded chicken were prepared as alternatives for this meal. During the observation of meal plating on 7/20/22 at 11:55 a.m. the following occurred: 1. Resident 52, who had spicy food listed as a dislike, was given pureed taco…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility, for a census of 111, failed to ensure: 1. Opened, refrigerated foods were properly labeled with open date and used by date; and, 2. Food preparation equipment were properly cleaned and dried before storing for next use; and, 3. Foods brought in by resident's family were labeled properly inside the resident refrigerator. These failures had the potential of causing food borne illness for the 107 residents who ate at the facility. Findings: 1. During the Initial kitchen tour with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and Registered Dietitian (RD) on 7/19/2022 at 8:30 a.m., two large, opened bottles of salad dressings (1 Italian and 1 Caesar) and a large bottle of Teriyaki sauce were found unlabeled and undated in the walk-in refrigerator. Neither the CDM nor RD could state if they were still safe to use. During an interview with the CDM on 7/21/22 at 10:11 a.m., she stated it was important to monitor use by dates as, the age of the product will affect the safety of the food as well as the nutrient value. A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were performed for 11 residents (Resident 5, Resident 7, Resident 26, Resident 36, Resident 47, Resident 86, Resident 103, Resident 156, Resident 158, Resident 160, Resident 354) of 24 sampled residents, when: 1. The Director of Nursing (DON) and Certified Nurse Aide 3 (CNA 3) entered resident rooms without wearing proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) according to posted signs on the door; 2. Staff did not follow the manufacturer's instruction on disinfectant contact time; 3. Hand hygiene was not performed between glove change, and staff donned PPE improperly; and, 4. Hand hygiene was not initiated before meals for two residents. These failures reduced the facility's potential to prevent a spread of infection. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/19/22 at 10:10 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) entered Resident 7 and Resident 47's room without a gown and face shield. Outside the rooms a posted sign indicated the rooms were yellow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 91) received regular insulin (a medication used to treat high blood sugar levels in the body) as ordered by the physician. This failure increased Resident 91's risk of complications of diabetes (a chronic long-lasting health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy). The facility census was 111. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder that causes blood sugar levels to be abnormally high and requires insulin to lower the blood sugar level) with chronic kidney disease, diabetic neuropathy (a diabetes complication which could lead to weakness, numbness, and pain in the feet), and diabetic retinopathy (a diabetes complication which affects vision). A review of Resident 91's physician's order dated 4/12/22 indicated, .insulin regular human .per sliding scale .If blood sugar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 91) was free from significant medication errors when regular insulin (an injectable medication used to treat high blood sugar levels in the body) was administered late. This failure to administer the medication on time increased Resident 91's risk of complications from diabetes (a chronic long-lasting health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy). The facility census was 111. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder that causes blood sugar levels to be abnormally high and requires insulin to lower the blood sugar level) with chronic kidney disease, diabetic neuropathy (a diabetes complication which could lead to weakness, numbness, and pain in the feet), and diabetic retinopathy (a diabetes complication which affects vision). A review of Resident 91's physician's order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPITAL SNF HOLDING COMPANY, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/30/2023 |
| PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/30/2023 |
| BHUTANI, SHIVANI | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/01/2023 |
| OLSON, ABRAHAM | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 10/10/2023 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056410. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.