Valley Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 274 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 41.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 97 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.69 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 47.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.17 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to two of 20 sampled residents (Residents 148 and 23) as follows. 1 a). Resident 148, identified as a high risk for falls, was not provided with a sitter after the resident was deemed needing one-one supervision to prevent further falls. This resulted in Resident 148 sustaining another serious fall injuries (a comminuted fracture that is broken in at least two pieces caused by trauma to the right clavicle (collarbone), and a subdural hematoma (condition when a pool of blood develops between the brain and its covering, usually from head trauma). b). Resident 148 eloped on 12/7/23 and was later found in a hospital emergency department (ED). This episode of elopement was not reported by the facility to the department. 2. The facility did not apply the ordered bed pad alarm (alerts staff of position movement out of bed) for Resident 23. For Resident 23, this had the potential for fall injuries.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure water temperatures were maintained within a safe range for five of eight sampled residents (Residents 1, 40, 45, 59, and 60) when two Jack-and-[NAME] bathrooms (shared bathrooms with two separate entrances from two different rooms) had faucet sink water temperatures exceeding 120 (degrees) Fahrenheit (a temperature scale used to measure how cold or hot something is).This failure placed Residents 1, 40, 45, 59, and 60 at risk for scald (type of burn caused by contact with hot liquids or steam) injuries.During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), printed on 4/28/26, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in March 2026 with diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive, irreversible brain disorder that destroys memory and cognitive functions)During a record review of Resident 40's AR, printed on 4/30/26, the AR indicated Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with diagnosis of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not demonstrate competency in dialysis care to provide services for four (Resident 22, Resident 32, Resident 66, and Resident 3) of four dialysis-dependent (dialysis, a type of treatment that helps the body remove extra fluid and waste products from the blood when the kidneys fail) residents in accordance with the facility assessment.This failure did not ensure the licensed nurses' competency and skills were met to provide safe care which could potentially result in dialysis-dependent residents receiving inappropriate care and services.A review of Resident 22's admission Record printed 5/1/26 indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (renal failure), diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), and dependence on renal dialysis, with a port catheter (Port-a-Cath, a dialysis access site surgically placed fully under the skin that cannot be assessed for bruit [swishing sound] and thrill [a buzzing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders for two of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 5) when licensed nursing staff administered medications, including anticoagulant (commonly known as blood thinners, are substances or medications that prevent or reduce the body's ability to form blood clots) and antiplatelet (medications that prevent blood cells called platelets from sticking together and clumping) medications, approximately 90 minutes earlier than physician-ordered administration times and subsequently documented inaccurate administration times that did not reflect the actual time of medication administration.This failure placed Resident 1 and Resident 5 at risk for clinically significant medication errors, reduced therapeutic effectiveness and adverse drug reactions including bleeding complications.During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), printed on 4/28/26, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in March 2026 with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage and labeling practices with census of 47 when:1. Multiple medications with different routes of administration (a way by which a drug is taken into the body) were stored together in medication refrigerator and Medication Cart #1.2. Four pre-refilled COVID-19 (contagious respiratory illness) vaccine (medication that helps body build immunity against a disease) syringes were stored in the medication refrigerator without the original container and without labeling.These failed practices had the potential for medication identification errors, contamination, improper medication use, and administration errors. During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) printed on 4/28/26, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in March 2026 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (acute brain dysfunction caused by chemical imbalances) and glaucoma (an eye condition that damages the optic nerve).During a record review of Resident 2's AR printed on 4/29/26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed when:The cool down process for time, temperature control for safety (TCS) food, food that needs to be kept at specific temperatures to prevent bacteria growth and foodborne illnesses, was not monitored. 2. Facial hair was not covered. 3. Meal preparation equipment was not air dried. 4. The food preparation sink did not have backflow prevention. 5. Opened food in resident refrigerator was not labeled and dated. 6. The kitchen environment was not clean or in good working order. 7. The test strips used to monitor cleaning solution levels were expired. These failures posed the risk for foodborne illnesses in a highly susceptible resident population of 45 facility residents who received food prepared in the kitchen. 1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 04/27/2026 at 9:42 AM with Registered Dietitian (RD) in the kitchen, tuna salad and egg salad labeled with a preparation date of 04/26/2026 was found in the reach in refrigerator. RD…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper disposal and containment of refuse. The outdoor dumpster located near the facility was observed with its lid propped open due to an overflow of trash inside the container. Additional refuse, including dirty gloves and food waste, were scattered on the ground beneath and around the bin. The recycling area also contained overflowed cardboard boxes and other recyclables placed on the ground next to the recycling container.These deficient practices had the potential to attract rodents and insects and cross-contamination of food.During a concurrent interview and observation on 4/27/26 at 2:33 p.m., of the outdoor dumpster area with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the dumpster lid was observed propped open due to an overflow of trash inside the container, and a strong foul odor was present. Additional refuse, including dirty gloves and food waste were scattered on the ground beneath and around the bin. The recycling dumpster was also observed with an overflow of cardboard boxes and other recyclables placed on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their infection prevention and control policies and procedures when:1. For one (Residents 45) of three sampled residents, resident's unbagged continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP, a machine that uses a mask to supply air pressure in keeping the airway open) mask and nebulizer (used to deliver medication in a fine mist over the nose and mouth) mask were left exposed to air.2. For one (Residents 59) of three sampled residents, Resident 59's unbagged nasal cannula was found on the floor.3. For one (Residents 3) of three sampled residents, Licensed Nurse performed direct patient care without wearing the proper personal protective equipment (PPEs, wearable gear to protect workers from illness or infection) upon entrance to a room on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP, an infection control strategy to reduce risk of multidrug-resistant organisms).For Residents 45, 59, and 3, these deficient practices had the potential to result in the spread of infection.4. Housekeeping (Hskg)/Laundry Staff belongings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards for one of five sampled residents (Resident 72) on oxygen (O2, a prescription drug used to treat low blood oxygen level) therapy when the facility did not follow physician orders for oxygen administration. This failure resulted in Resident 72 receiving more oxygen than ordered, which placed the resident at risk for serious harm.A review of Resident 72's admission Records, printed on 4/28/26, indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple rib fractures and history of fall.A review of Resident 72's Care Plan, indicated a focus titled, Oxygen: Resident requires the use of oxygen (continuous) related to shortness of breath due to (d/t) .rib fractures. Interventions included, Administer oxygen at two liters (2L) via nasal cannula.Monitor and report signs of hypoxia (when the body is not getting enough…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services and procedures to one sampled resident (Resident 49) to ensure the timely acquisition, dispensing, and administration of routine medications when Resident 49's inhalation medication was not available during medication administration.This failure had the potential to result in delayed or missed medication administration and had the risks for increased exacerbation of respiratory conditions.During a record review of Resident 49's admission Record (AR) printed on 4/30/26, the AR indicated Resident 49 was admitted to the facility in February 2026 with diagnoses including nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (bleeding into brain tissue) and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating because of thinking skills).During a record review of Resident 49's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 4/1/26 to 4/30/26, the MAR indicated Resident 49 had a physician order dated 2/14/26 for Breo Ellipta (reduces inflammation in the lungs and relaxes and opens the airways to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 49) received medications as ordered without an error. The facility's medication pass observation during the survey resulted in two errors out of 31 opportunities and indicated a medication error rate of 6.45 percent (%).This failure placed Resident 49 at risk for not getting the full therapeutic effect of their prescribed medications and had the potential to result in adverse health outcomes including, worsening of respiratory symptoms, increased risk for blood clot (thick, viscous, or semi-solid lump formed when blood thickens) formation and stroke (a medical emergency caused by a sudden interruption of blood flow to the brain or a ruptured blood vessel, leading to rapid brain cell death).During a record review of Resident 49's admission Record (AR) printed on 4/30/26, the AR indicated Resident 49 was admitted to the facility in February 2026 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) following nontraumatic intracerebral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,033 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-01-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $649K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA