No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Stoney Point Healthcare Center

21820 Craggy View St., Chatsworth, CA 91311 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 132 certified beds · (818) 882-8233 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (818) 882-8233 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (21% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
10141 Variel St
Pharmacy
21413 Devonshire St · (747) 202-3222 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Ralphs0.2 mi
21431 Devonshire St · (818) 341-0950 · Call to confirm hours
Park
10005 Old Depot Plaza Rd · (213) 922-6235 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
10210 Canoga Ave · (818) 832-0943

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.7%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.8%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.7%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.5%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.4%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.0%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.4%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.4%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table44.9%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.0%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.6%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.732.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.371.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 214 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
79.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.69U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.34hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.32hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 79.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 134 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.69 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.4%CMS range 31.3–49.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.2%CMS range 9.5–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge79.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge67.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge87.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 5.0–11.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.681.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.43
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.78
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
21.2%
Total nursing turnover
55.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 123.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 21% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-03)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-25)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-07-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse (deliberately aggressive or violent behavior with the intention to cause harm) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2) when on 7/3/2024 Resident 1 hit Resident 2's face. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 being subjected to physical abuse by Resident 1 while under the care of the facility. Resident 2 sustained a cut (a break in skin due to injury) on the left eye area of Resident 2's face, redness (red discoloration [a change in natural skin tone] to the skin) on the left eye area of Resident 2's face and swelling (accumulation of fluid in the skin tissues due to injury) on the left eye area of Resident 2's face. Based on the reasonable person concept (hypothetical [suggested], average person's reaction to the actual circumstances of alleged illegal activities) due to Resident 2's severely impaired cognition (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical records of one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) were released in a timely manner to Resident 1's Responsible Party 1 (RP 1) after receiving a valid request for the medical records from RP 1 on 5/27/2026. This deficient practice resulted in a delay in RP 1's ability to review Resident 1's medical records. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility admitted Resident 1 on 5/27/2026 with diagnoses that include dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme, uncontrollable shifts in mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration) and schizophrenia (a mental illness that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P- a comprehensive assessment of a resident's medical condition) dated 5/30/2011, the H&P indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medical record for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) was complete and accurately documented after Resident 2 reported to Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 that Resident 2 had hit Resident 2's left eye on the bedside table (a table positioned at the bedside of resident to assist with meals). This deficient practice had the potential to result in delays in care and services, compromise the continuity of care, and negatively affect Resident 2's overall health status.During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility admitted Resident 2 on 5/2/2025 with diagnoses that include pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs), type 2 diabetes (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and history of falling. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper use of a low air loss mattress (LALM- a specialty bed that alternates pressure to help heal and prevent pressure ulcer/injuries [ PU/PI-injuries that breakdown the skin and underlying tissue when an area of skin is placed under pressure]) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when on 5/28/2026 a cloth pad and a sheet were placed over the mattress surface while Resident 1 was also wearing an incontinence (loss of bowel or bladder control) brief (diaper). This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the effectiveness of the LALM by reducing airflow and pressure redistribution, thereby increasing the risk of skin breakdown, development or worsening of PU/PI, excess moisture retention and delayed wound healing. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 1/30/2026 with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, peripheral autonomic neuropathy (a condition where the nerves that automatically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents' (Resident 1) rights were respected by not changing Resident 1's room assignment as requested by Resident 1's Responsible Party (RP) 1 in a timely manner. This deficient practice violated the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity, which had the potential to affect the resident's sense of self-worth and self-esteem.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 1/7/2026 with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (a syndrome of general brain dysfunction causing confusion and memory loss), depression, and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental status). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated 1/8/2026, the H&P indicated the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 1/9/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognition (ability to think and make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain privacy and confidentiality of personal and medical records for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2's personal and medical records were provided to Resident 1's responsible party (RP 1). This deficient practice violated Resident 2's right to personal privacy and confidentiality of the resident's personal and medical records.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/8/2026 with diagnoses that included a fracture ( a break in the bone) of the fifth lumbar vertebra (a bone in the low back), type 2 diabetes (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), and dementia (a progress state of decline in mental status).During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P) dated 1/9/2026, the H&P…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to ensure high concentration oxygen (a compressed gas cylinder containing oxygen at a high-pressure level, delivering pure oxygen with very high purity [up to 99.5 percent {%}] for medical use) was administered and correct oxygen delivery device (a piece of medical equipment that provides supplemental oxygen [a medical treatment that provides additional oxygen to the body when the air we normally breathe doesn't contain enough for organs to function correctly] to a resident who is unable to get enough oxygen on their own) was used when on 8/30/2025 at 9:20 a.m., Resident 1 had an oxygen saturation level (amount of oxygen that is circulating in the blood, normal range: 95% to 100%) of 80 % while receiving oxygen via nasal cannula (a medical device, typically a thin, flexible tube with two prongs, that delivers supplemental oxygen to a person's nostrils). This deficient practice had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three (Resident 12, Resident 65, Resident 121) of 6 sampled residents were free from unnecessary medication by failing to:1. Ensure the following conditions existed for Seroquel (brand name for an antipsychotic medication, a drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) to be prescribed: the symptoms are identified as being due to mania (mental state of an extreme highs or depressive lows) or psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality) or delusions, (having false or unrealistic beliefs such as paranoia [unjustified mistrust of others]/grandiosity [inflated sense of superiority]; the behavioral symptoms (sudden anger outburst) present a danger to the resident or others; and the symptoms are significant enough that the resident is experiencing inconsolable/persistent distress for Resident 12. There was no documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of seven sampled residents (Residents 7, 79, and 85) received appropriate services to prevent a decline in range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) by failing to:1a. For Resident 7, provide Restorative Nursing Aide program (RNA, nursing aide program that help residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) treatment for passive range of motion (PROM, movement at a given joint with full assistance from another person) to both lower extremities (BLE, hip, knee, ankle, foot) seven times a week in May 2025 and June 2025 as ordered by a physician and in accordance with Resident 7's care plan.1b. For Resident 7, complete a quarterly joint mobility screen timely.2. For Resident 79, complete a quarterly joint mobility screen timely.3. For Resident 85, complete a quarterly joint mobility screen timely.These deficient practices had the potential to cause stiffness and pain for Resident 7 and decline in ROM for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Medication Regimen Review (MRR- review of a resident's drug therapy to assure appropriateness of medication usage completed each month by the consultant pharmacist) was acted upon for three of six sampled residents (Resident 116, Resident 12, and Resident 121 by failing to: Complete an EKG (electrocardiogram - a simple, painless test that measures the heart's electrical activity) for the usage of Quetiapine (antipsychotic medication) for Resident 116. This deficient practice could have resulted in missed dangerous heart rhythms that Quetiapine can cause in high-risk populations such as the elderly. 2. Follow the pharmacist consultant's recommendation to have documentation to support the use of Seroquel (brand name for an antipsychotic medication, a drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) for by failing to:a. Ensure the following conditions existed for Seroquel to be prescribed: the symptoms are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure leftover food brought from outside by residents' family and visitors were labeled with a resident identifier and use-by-date in one of one resident refrigerator (Refrigerator 1).This deficient practice had the potential to result in foodborne illness (also called food poisoning, illness caused by eating contaminated food) for the residents.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/30/2025 at 8:44 a.m., with the Administrator in Training (AIT), observed the residents' refrigerator in the nurse's station. Observed in the refrigerator, two plastic bags of undetermined leftover food with no name, date or resident identifier. The AIT stated that this refrigerator is used to store resident's food and when placing resident's leftover food, the leftover food must be labeled with an identifier and date. During an interview on 7/3/2025 at 8:16 a.m., with the AIT, the AIT stated that residents are informed that leftover food will be refrigerated and will be discarded after 48 hours. The AIT…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 44 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain accurate clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for four (Resident 7, Resident 79, Resident 85, and Resident 12) of 32 sampled residents by failing to:1.a. Ensure therapy staff did not accurately document a late Rehab Joint Mobility Screen, for Resident 7, dated 4/3/2025 and completed on 7/1/2025.b. Ensure therapy staff did not accurately document a late Rehab Joint Mobility Screen, for Resident 79, dated 4/30/2025 and completed on 7/1/2025.c. Ensure therapy staff did not accurately document a late Rehab Joint Mobility Screen, for Resident 85, dated 4/9/2025 and completed on 7/1/2025.These deficient practices resulted in inaccurate medical documentation and had the potential for a decline in range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) in Residents 7, 79, and 85.2. Ensure Resident 7's diagnosis of anxiety was included in the diagnosis list in the resident's medical record.This deficient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a facility staff knocked and asked permission prior to entering a resident's room for two of two sampled residents (Resident 18 and 44). This deficient practice violated the residents' rights to be treated with respect and dignity, which had the potential to affect the residents' sense of self-worth and self-esteem.Findings:a. During a review of Resident 18's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/30/2025 with diagnoses including, Alzheimer`s Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and lack of coordination.During a review of Resident 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 6/6/2025, the MDS indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and senses. The MDS indicated that Resident 18 was totally dependent on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light (a device used by a resident to signal his/her need for assistance from staff) was within a resident's reach while in bed for one of one sampled resident (Resident 25). This deficient practice had the potential to delay the provision of services and the resident's needs not being met.Findings:During a review of Resident 25's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/23/2024 with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and schizophrenia (mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally). During a review of Resident 25's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 3/27/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 25's cognition (a mental process of acquitting knowledge and understanding) was impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 25 required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs - activities related to personal care). During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/30/2025 at 10:07 a.m., with Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the resident's Advance Directive (AD- a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) was kept in the resident's medical chart and easily retrievable for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 40 and 81).This deficient practice had the potential to create confusion which could lead to conflict with the resident`s wishes regarding their health care.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 40’s admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 7/5/2025, with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type 2 diabetes (DM- a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood glucose [sugar]), and anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells). During a review of Resident 40’s Minimum Data Set (MDS – a resident assessment tool) dated 5/1/2025, the MDS indicated that Resident 40 could understand others…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a complete baseline care plan (a document designed to facilitate communication among members of the care team that summarizes a resident's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments) within 48 hours of a resident`s admission to the facility by failing to address the resident`s indwelling catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 81). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 81 to not receive appropriate care and treatment in the facility. Findings:During a review of Resident 81's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility originally admitted the resident on 1/3/2025 and readmitted the resident on 6/17/2025, with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), obstructive uropathy (a blockage in the urinary tract that prevents urine from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan (a document designed to facilitate communication among members of the care team that summarizes a resident's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments) for two of four sampled residents (Resident 75 and 114) by failing to: 1. Develop a care plan addressing Resident 75's use of olanzapine (medication used to treat schizophrenia (mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally) and bipolar disorder (mental disorder that causes unusual shifts in mood, energy, activity levels, concentration, and the ability to carry out day-to-day tasks). 2. Develop a care plan addressing Resident 114's use of amphetamine-dextroamphetamine (medication used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD - a chronic condition including attention difficulty, hyperactivity, and impulsiveness]). These deficient practices had the potential to result in failure to deliver the necessary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update and revise a resident`s dental care plan (a document that summarizes a resident's needs, goals, and care/treatment) after the resident`s upper dentures went missing for one of three sampled residents (Resident 69). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 69 receiving inadequate care and services. Findings:During a review of Resident 69's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility originally admitted the resident on 5/12/2022 and readmitted the resident on 12/3/2024, with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), type two diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood glucose [sugar]), and schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought).During a review of Resident 69's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 4/30/2025, the MDS indicated that the resident`s cognitive skills (brain's ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to:1. Ensure fall risk assessments were completed accurately for one of ten sampled residents (Resident 7).This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 7 at an increased risk of falling.2. Ensure a fall risk assessment was completed for one of ten sampled residents (Resident 119) after the resident`s fall on 6/25/2025. This deficient practice placed Resident 119 at an increased risk for recurrent falls and injuries. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 7’s admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/20/2020 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy (the loss of brain function due to a chemical imbalance in the blood), lack of coordination, and mild cognitive impairment (a decline in mental abilities, including thinking, learning, remembering, and decision-making) of unknown etiology (the cause of a disease or abnormal condition). During a review of Resident 7’s…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the hemodialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) center completed a post-dialysis assessment (evaluation done after hemodialysis by the hemodialysis licensed nurses) by failing to ensure the dialysis center recorded a resident's post dialysis weight (the weight after fluid is removed during the dialysis treatment) on 6/25/2025.This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 46 to have unidentified complications after dialysis treatment such as abnormal vital signs (pulse rate, temperature, respiration rate, and blood pressure, that indicate the state of a patient's essential body functions). Findings:During a review of Resident 46's admission Record (or face sheet, the front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated the patient was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs by failing to adequately monitor potential adverse effects of amphetamine-dextroamphetamine (stimulant medication to treat ADHD [differences in how the brain develops and works causing problems with a person's attention, ability to sit still, and practice self-control]) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 114). This deficient practice had the potential for adverse effects including psychosis (hallucinations, delusions, paranoia, aggression, hostility) and heart issues such as fast heartbeat and hypertension.Findings:During a review of Resident 114's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 114 on 4/15/2025 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), and unspecified atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm in the upper part of the heart). During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate a resident's food allergies and preferences for one of six residents (Resident 7) investigated under nutrition by:1. Failing to document Resident 7's allergy to eggs on the tray ticket (a document that accompanies a meal tray with essential information about the meal and the resident receiving it).2. Failing to ensure Resident 7 received a substitution for breakfast when eggs were not served.These failures placed Resident 7 at risk of:1. Being served eggs and having a reaction such as a rash, hives, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration (occurs when your body loses too much water and other fluids), and/or anaphylactic shock (severe allergic reaction including closure of airways). 2. Not receiving the needed nutrition, they require. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 7’s admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/20/2020 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy (the loss of brain function due to a chemical imbalance in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of medically-related social services to meet one of five sampled residents (Resident 4) needs by failing to follow up the status of Resident 4's missing rollator walker (a mobility aid designed for residents who need support while walking) and ensure timely replacement of Resident 4's missing rollator walker. On 10/26/2024, Resident 4 was discharged from the facility without providing Resident 4's rollator walker. This deficient practice placed Resident 4 at risk for health and safety impacts such as impairing Resident 4's ability to walk safely leading to fall and injury, reduced mobility (movement), and loss of independence which can lead to decreased self-esteem (confidence in one's own abilities or worth) and a sense of helplessness. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/27/2024 with diagnoses that included systemic lupus erythematosus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) discharge planning process included, providing Resident 1 and Resident 1 ' s Responsible Party (RP) 1 with information including services and quality measures (quantify healthcare processes, outcomes, patient perceptions, and organizational structure and/or systems) of the accepting skilled nursing facility Resident 1 was transferred to. This deficient practice had potential for decreased quality of care, decreased quality of life and continuity of care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (facesheet) dated 2/16/2025, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a change in how your brain works due to an underlying condition), pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs), cerebral infarction (CVA-stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), dementia (a progressive state of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain an informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) verification from a resident responsible party (RP - a person who makes medical decision for a resident) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) regarding the administration of antipsychotic (a medication used to treat psychosis [a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality] related symptoms and conditions) medication known as Olanzapine (a medication used to treat and manage psychosis) from Resident 1's RP. This deficient practice resulted in the facility administering a psychotropic (a medication that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) medication to Resident 1 without informed consent and denied Resident 1's RP the right to make informed treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan (a document designed to facilitate communication among members of the care team that summarizes a resident's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments) for seven of 30 sampled residents (Resident 34, 117, 65, 7, 72, 59, and 27) by failing to: 1. Develop a care plan addressing Resident 34, 117, and 65's insulin (hormone that regulates the level of glucose [sugar] in the blood) use. 2. Develop a care plan addressing Resident 7's use of psychotropic medications (medications capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior). 3. Develop a care plan addressing Resident 72's diagnosis of viral hepatitis C (a viral infection that causes liver inflammation (swelling). 4. Develop a care plan addressing Resident 59 and Resident 27's diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary system) and antibiotic (medications that fight bacterial infections) use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure medication administration was supervised and medications were not left at bedside for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 7). This deficient practice had the potential to allow Resident 7 to miss a dose of medications and allow other residents to consume the medications. 2. Ensure a resident's bed was positioned in the lowest position while the resident was in bed, as ordered by the physician, for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 22). This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at increased risk of sustaining a fall with injuries. 3. Ensure one of one resident (Resident 118), who was at high risk for falls, had bilateral landing mats placed in her room next to her bed as ordered by physician. This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at increased risk of sustaining an injury. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 7's admission Record indicated the facility readmitted the resident on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses documented that they attempted non-pharmacological interventions (any type of healthcare intervention which is not primarily based on medication) prior to administering as needed (prn) opioid medications (medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) on multiple days for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 29). This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at increased risk of experiencing adverse side effects (undesired harmful effect resulting from a medication or other intervention) from opioid pain medication. Findings: A review of Resident 29's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/3/2024 with diagnoses including polyneuropathy (disease or dysfunction of one or more peripheral nerves [nerves located outside of the brain and spinal cord], typically causing numbness or weakness) and chronic pulmonary edema (a condition that occurs when fluid builds up in the lungs over time, making it difficult to breathe). A review of Resident 29's Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from significant medication error by failing to administer several medications as ordered by the physician for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 7). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 7 receiving her medications late and had the potential to result in Resident 7 missing a dose of her medications. Findings: A review of Resident 7's admission Record indicated the facility readmitted the resident on 4/30/2024 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (ESRD- a condition in which the kidneys [organs that remove waste products from the blood and produce urine] no longer function normally). A review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident assessment and care screening tool) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident 7 had severely impaired cognition (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses). A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. A review of Resident 7's admission Record indicated the facility readmitted the resident on 4/30/2024 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (ESRD- a condition in which the kidneys [organs that remove waste products from the blood and produce urine] no longer function normally). A review of Resident 7's MDS dated [DATE], indicated Resident 7 had severely impaired cognition. A review of Resident 7's Order Summary Report, dated 7/25/2024, indicated an order for oxygen inhalation at two (2) liters per min (LPM, unit of measurement) via nasal cannula as need for shortness of breath and comfort with a titration (adjusting the dose of a medication) of three (3) to five (5) liters as needed, ordered 5/8/2024. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/22/2024 at 10:25 a.m., with Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) in Resident 7's room, observed Resident 7's oxygen concentrator (medical device that gives oxygen) humidifier and nasal cannula were both unlabeled with the nasal cannula around the oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' call lights (a device used by patients to call for assistance from hospital staff) were within reach for two of 30 sampled residents (Resident 27 and 28) . This deficient practice had the potential to result in the residents not being able to call for facility staff assistance and delay in the provision of necessary care and services that can negatively affect the residents' comfort and well-being. Findings: a. A review of Resident 27's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/27/2022 with diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a common lung disease that damages the airways or other parts of the lungs, making it difficult to breathe), difficulty in walking, and lack of coordination. A review of Resident 27's History and Physical (H&P, a comprehensive assessment of a resident and their problem) dated 6/5/2023, indicated that does not have the capacity to understand and make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3) provided privacy to a resident before administering medications via gastrostomy tube (g-tube - a tube that's surgically inserted through the abdomen and into the stomach used for medication and nutrition) for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 62). This deficient practice violated the resident's right to privacy. Findings: A review of Resident 62's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/2/2019 with diagnoses including aphasia (a language disorder that makes it difficult to understand and express language, as well as read and write), hemiplegia (partial or complete paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (mild loss of strength or paralysis on one side of the body), and encounter for attention to gastrostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the skin and into the stomach to insert a feeding tube). A review of Resident 62's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow safe food handling practices by failing to discard two bags of hotdog buns 12 days past their best by date. This deficient practice had the potential to place 24 out of 121 residents living in the facility at risk for foodborne illnesses (refers to illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages). Findings: During a kitchen observation on 7/22/2024 at 8:11 a.m., with Kitchen Supervisor 1 (KS1), observed two bags of hotdog buns containing 12 buns in each bag with a Best By date of 7/10/2024. KS 1 stated he is going to discard the hotdog buns. KS 1 further stated that the hotdog buns are no longer safe for the residents to consume if past its Best By date. KS 1 stated that hotdog buns may already have mold and if eaten could result to foodborne illnesses. A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Food Receiving and Storage, last reviewed on 1/16/2024, indicated, Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices .

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to follow the facility ' s policy related to smoking for two of five sampled residents (Resident 3 and 4) when they allowed Resident 3 to share a cigarette with Resident 4. This deficient practice has the potential for Resident 4 to be place at risk for accidents such as burns. Findings: A review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted the Resident 3 on 1/15/2024 with diagnosis that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (A long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), and respiratory disorders (diseases related to the lungs). A review of Resident 3 ' s History and Physical dated 1/16/2024 indicated that Resident 3 has the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and screening tool) dated 1/22/2024, indicated that Resident 3 had moderately impaired cognition (the mental action or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of two sampled residents (Resident 6) was free from physical restraint (the use of a manual hold or device to restrict freedom of movement of all or part of a resident ' s body) when facility staff placed a lap buddy (cushioned device that fits in a wheelchair and assist with reminding a person not to get up by themselves) on the resident ' s wheelchair without a restraint assessment, consent ( when a resident gives permission before they receive any type of medical treatment), and physician ' s order. This deficient practice resulted in the absence of continued assessment and monitoring of a restraint, and had the potential to result in an increased risk for complications of restraint use such as decline in functioning, injury, entrapment (event in which a resident is caught, trapped or entangled in a space where they are being restrained), or death caused by physical restraints. Findings: A review of Resident 6 ' s…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan (a plan for an individual's specific health needs and desired health outcomes) for two of five sampled residents (Resident 1 and 6) by failing to: 1. Ensure a care plan was created for a positive Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19 - a highly contagious respiratory illness in humans capable of producing severe symptoms) test for Resident 1. 2. Ensure a care plan was created addressing Resident 6 being identified as a high fall risk . This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in or lack of delivery of care and services. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 12/13/2019 and readmitted the resident on 6/15/2023 with diagnoses including Cerebral infarction (CVA or stroke, when something blocks blood supply to part of the brain or when a blood vessel in the brain bursts)), COVID-19 and aphasia (language disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written information and assistance with formulating an advance directive (a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor), for four (Residents 6, 85, 19, and 114) out of 13 sampled residents investigated for advance directives. This deficient practice violated residents' and/or their representatives' right to be fully informed of the option to formulate an advance directive and to cause conflict due to lack of communication regarding residents' wishes about their medical treatment. Findings: a. A review of the admission record indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility, on 11/23/2021, with diagnoses including muscle weakness, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). A review of the Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT - a team of healthcare professionals from different professional disciplines who work together to manage the physical, psychological and spiritual needs of the patient) failed to ensure that care plans were reviewed for two out three residents (Resident 47 and 52) investigated under the care area of Care Plan Timing and Revision, by failing to: 1. Ensure care plans were revised timely when Resident 47 started receiving hospice (end of life care) services on 11/10/2021. 2. Ensure care plans were revised timely for the use of Zyprexa (an anti-psychotic - medication used to treat severe agitation associated with certain mental/mood conditions) and Remeron (an antidepressant - a medication used primarily to treat depression) for Resident 52. These deficient practices had the potential to affect the provision of necessary care and services for Residents 47 and 52. Findings: a. A review of the admission record indicated Resident 47 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses assessed a resident's arteriovenous shunt (AV shunt - abnormal connections between coronary arteries and a compartment of the venous side of the heart) before and after dialysis (process of removing excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally) treatments for one (Resident 81) out of one sampled resident investigated for dialysis. This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for a delay in detecting if the resident had a non-functioning AV shunt and a delay in detecting complications including infections and bleeding. Findings: A review of Resident 81's Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (when the kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood the way they should). A review of Resident 81's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food and supplies in a safe manner by failing to ensure a scoop was not left in the all- purpose flour container. This deficient practice had the potential to result in contamination after repeated use without washing and cleaning the scoop that could lead to harmful bacteria growth that can cause foodborne illnesses (illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) on 02/28/2022 at 07:57 a.m., observed a plastic container containing powdery substance. Upon closer inspection, observed a stainless scoop partly buried in the powdery substance. According to DA 1, the content of the container was an all-purpose flour, and the scoop should not be left inside the container since the handle always comes in contact with the hands of the staff when they use the scoop to obtain flour for cooking. According to DA 1, repeated use without cleaning or washing the scoop could result to contamination of the scoop…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program by: 1. Failing to ensure the gastrostomy (a surgically placed device used to give direct access to the stomach for feeding, hydration, or medication) irrigation syringe (syringe designed for delivering tube feeding, water, and medications) was changed every 24 as indicated in the facility policy and procedure for two (Resident 27 and Resident 111) of three sampled residents reviewed for tube feeding. 2. Failing to label the nebulizer (a machine that creates a mist out of liquid medication) tubing with the date it was last changed for one (Resident 27) of three sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. 3. Failing to ensure the resident's oxygen tubing was kept off the floor for two (Resident 82 and Resident 96) out of three sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. 4. Failing to ensure the resident's oxygen tubing was dated for one (Resident 96) of three sampled residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-04 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain an informed consent from the resident and/or resident representative for the use of lap cushion/buddy (an inflatable cushion that snugs into the wheelchair frame itself) which restricts the resident`s freedom of movement, for one (Resident 6) of one resident reviewed for use of restraints. This deficient practice violated the resident's right to be informed from any restrictions such as restraints. Findings: A review of admission record indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility, on 11/23/2021, with diagnoses including muscle weakness, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), and dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and screening tool), dated 11/30/2021, indicated Resident 6's cognition (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) was severely impaired. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were accessible by residents by: 1. Failure to ensure the toilet shared by Residents 16, 35, 62, and 66 had a cord attached to the call light (a device used by a patient to signal his or her need for assistance from professional staff). 2. Failure to ensure Resident 106's call light was within reach while in bed for one out of six sampled residents investigated for accommodation of needs. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for not receiving the necessary assistance to promote residents' safety. Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 02/28/2022 at 10:06 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1), the call light in the bathroom in between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were observed without a cord for residents to pull to receive assistance from staff. LVN 1 stated Residents 16, 35, 62, and 66 were using the toilet in the bathroom. LVN 1 stated it was important for the call light to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-04 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and the resident representative written bed hold notice at the time of transfer to the general acute care hospital (GACH) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 87) investigated under care area for hospitalization. This deficient practice could lead to a transfer of the resident to another skilled nursing facility without the responsible party's acknowledgement. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated Resident 87 was admitted to the facility, on 1/21/2022, with diagnoses that included acute respiratory distress (a condition that causes fluid to build up in your lungs and deprives your organs of oxygen), hyperlipidemia (a condition in which there are high levels of fat particles in the blood), dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), hypertension (high blood pressure), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-04 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive standardized assessment and screening tool) for significant change in status was completed within the required time frame for one of one sampled resident (Resident 47) when resident started receiving hospice services (end of life care). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the provision of necessary care and services. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated Resident 47 was admitted to the facility, on 3/27/2019, with diagnoses including vascular dementia (a condition caused by conditions such as stroke that disrupt blood flow to the brain and lead to problems with memory, thinking, and behavior), psychosis (a term used to describe when a person interprets or perceives reality in a different way to those around them), anxiety disorder (a disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-04 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's admission and discharge Minimum Data Sets (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool) were transmitted within 14 days after the assessment reference date (ARD - the specific end point of look-back periods in the MDS assessment process), for one (Resident 5) out of one sampled resident investigated for resident assessment. This deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed services for the resident. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility, on 09/04/2021, with diagnoses that included dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life). A review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS - a federal agency within the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that administers the Medicare program) Submission Report indicated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Develop and implement a CP (care plan - helps nurses and other care team members organize aspects of patient care according to a timeline) that would address the care needs of a resident on enteral feeding (a way of delivering nutrition directly to your stomach) via G-tube (gastrostomy tube - inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach), for one of two sampled resident (Resident 21) investigated under the care area comprehensive care plans. 2. Implement the care plan addressing the residents' need for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL- term used in healthcare to refer to people's daily self-care activities) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 83) investigated under the care area comprehensive care plans. These deficient practices have the potential for Residents 83 and 21 to lack the delivery of necessary care and services without an appropriate plan of care. Findings: a. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) did not leave medications unattended at the resident's bedside during the medication administration observation for one (Resident 114) out of four sampled residents observed for medication administration. This deficient practice had the potential to either cause a medication administration error. 2. Ensure LVN 2 administered potassium chloride (used to prevent or to treat low blood levels of potassium) with food and a full glass of water as prescribed by the physician for one (Resident 114) out of four sampled residents observed for medication administration. This deficient practice had the potential to cause stomach irritation to the resident. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated Resident 114 was admitted to the facility, on 05/01/2017 and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (the most common cause of dementia, a general term for memory loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 47) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to: 1. Ensure an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- a group of healthcare providers from different fields who work together or toward the same goal to provide the best care or best outcome for a patient or group of patients) meeting was held when Resident 47 started receiving hospice (care designed to give supportive care to people in the final phase of a terminal illness and focus on comfort and quality of life) services. 2. Ensure that facility care plan and hospice care plan were integrated and collaborated when Resident 47 started receiving hospice services. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect the resident's well-being and the provision of necessary care and services when the resident started receiving hospice services. Findings: A review of Resident 47's Face Sheet indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the as needed (PRN) order oxygen administration included the flow rate (amount of oxygen being delivered to the body) of oxygen in liters and failed to ensure nursing staff document the reason for PRN oxygen administration for one (Resident 27) of two sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice could lead to adverse effects (any unexpected or dangerous reaction to a drug) due to unnecessary oxygen administration or higher than necessary rate of oxygen administration leading to a negative impact on the resident's overall health. Findings: A review of Resident 27's Face Sheet indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was most recently readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses provided nonpharmacological (interventions that do not involve the use of medications) interventions prior to administering pain medication to two (Residents 19 and 181) out of two sampled residents investigated for pain management. This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of the residents experiencing adverse side effects (any unexpected or dangerous reaction to a drug) from pain medication. Findings: a. A review of Resident 19's Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a fractured (broken bone) rib. A review of Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 02/19/2022, indicated the resident had moderately impaired cognition (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses) and required extensive assistance from staff for bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-04 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing information was posted and updated in the lobby on a daily basis. This deficient practice resulted in the total number of staff and the actual hours worked by the staff not readily accessible to residents and visitors. Findings: During a concurrent observation and record review on 2/28/2022 at 7:35 a.m., observed a posting of the Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD - refers to the actual hours of work performed per patient day by a direct caregiver) at the lobby, indicated the date of 2/25/2022 and a resident census of 118. During an observation on 3/2/2022 at 7:26 a.m., the DHPPD posted in the facility lobby was not changed or updated and indicated a date of 2/28/2022. During an interview on 3/3/2022 at 1:58 p.m., the Director of Staff Development (DSD) stated the Staffer is responsible for posting the DHPPD in the lobby and at the Nurses' Station daily. The DSD validated that the staffing information was not updated upon showing photo of the posting in the lobby dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY b. A review of Resident 47's Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to vascular dementia (a condition caused by conditions such as stroke that disrupt blood flow to the brain and lead to problems with memory, thinking, and behavior), psychosis (a term used to describe when a person interprets or perceives reality in a different way to those around them), and anxiety disorder (a disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities). A review of Resident 47's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and screening tool) dated 12/31/2021, indicated the resident's cognitive skills (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) for daily decision making was severely impaired. The MDS indicated the resident did not receive an anti-anxiety medication during the 7-day look back period (time frame for observation). A review of Residents 47's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) of two of seven sampled residents (Resident 123 and 7) by failing to: 1. Accurately document Resident 123's discharge to reflect the correct disposition. 2. Accurately document Resident 7's current active diagnoses to reflect a diagnosis of anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations). These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect the residents' plan of care and the delivery of necessary care and services. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 123’s admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 2/25/2025 with diagnoses including type two (2) diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood glucose [sugar]), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool) section regarding falls was accurate for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 65). 2. Ensure a resident's MDS section regarding the presence of an advance directive (a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) was accurate for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 45). This deficient practice had the potential to delay care and services for the residents. Findings: a. A review of Resident 65's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 2/1/2023 with diagnoses including abnormalities of gait and mobility and lack of coordination. A review of Resident 65's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition (thought processes) and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-15 for 3 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
RUTHERFORD, KEINOIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/01/2023
HARTLEY, SAMUELIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2021
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$28.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+31.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.5M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 28%Medicare 29%Other / private 43%

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$428per resident / day
operating cost
$13,013per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$625per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555574. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next