Trellis Chino

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 578 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 224 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 57.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.67 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0839 — isolated
  Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of the three licensed vocational nurses (LVN 1) held a valid and current license to practice when LVN 1 worked with an expired license from [DATE], through [DATE].This failure had the potential to place 59 highly vulnerable residents at risk due to LVN 1's non-compliance with the legal requirement to practice nursing.Findings: During a telephone interview with LVN 1, on February 12, 2026, at 12:08 PM, LVN 1 stated I had been under the impression that I was working with an active license but was unaware that it had expired. LVN 1 stated her license expired on [DATE], and was only renewed on [DATE]. (22 days have passed since its expiration.)During a review of a letter from the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians regarding LVN 1, dated [DATE], it indicated LVN 1 was issued her license as a vocational nurse on [DATE]. Further review indicated .On [DATE], the license went delinquent (inactive) due to failure to renew. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the proper and safe infection control practices were followed when:1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not perform hand hygiene in between Residents 33 and 80's rooms. CNA 1 did not disinfect vital signs machine in between Resident 33 and 80. 2. CNA 2 did not perform hand hygiene before and after perineal care (cleaning the genital and anal areas) and did not utilize personal protective equipment (PPE - clothing and gear designed to protect you from hazards at work or during certain activities) in isolation room (room used to keep germs from spreading) for Resident 11. 3. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not perform hand hygiene nor don gloves after medication preparation and before medication administration in an isolation room for Resident 7. These failures had the potential to result in cross-contamination (the transfer of harmful bacteria) causing a preventable infection to 54 vulnerable residents whose health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS- a computerized assessment instrument) Assessments were completed accurately for one of two residents reviewed for resident assessment (Resident 43). This failure resulted in an inaccurate assessment, potentially leading to a misidentification of Resident 43's care and support needs.Findings:During a review of Resident 43's admission Record (a document that contains demographic and clinical data), it indicated Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included fibromyalgia (a long-term condition that involves widespread body pain) and rhabdomyolysis (condition in which damaged skeletal muscle [the main tissue responsible for body posture and movement] breaks down rapidly).A review of Resident 43's physician order, dated July 30, 2025, indicated Percocet [an opioid that binds to specific receptor in the body to give pain relief] . give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for severe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences were provided for one of seven residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 37) when Resident 37 did not receive a fresh fruit cup for breakfast as indicated on meal ticket on August 11, 2025.This failure had the potential to cause nutritional decline and unmet care needs for Resident 37.Findings:During a review of Resident 37's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of osteoarthritis (degeneration of the cartilage in single joint, leading to pain, stiffness and reduced range of motion), metabolic encephalopathy (condition where brain dysfunctions from metabolic imbalances such as nutrient intake or toxin buildup) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).During a review of Resident 37's Diet Order dated July 9, 2025, it indicated regular diet (healthy meal plan for individuals without specific medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an appropriate environment for storing all drugs and biologicals in accordance with accepted professional principles and the facility's policies and procedures for one of two medication rooms (South Station medication room) and one of two treatment cart (Treatment Cart 2) reviewed for medication storage, when: 1. The medication refrigerator inside the South Station medication room was found to be unsanitary on August 12, 2025. 2. Three opened and used ointments tubes were found without documented opened dates inside Treatment Cart 2 on August 13, 2025. These failures had the potential to cause contamination (when something harmful, like dirt, germs, or chemicals, mixes with something clean or safe, making it unsafe to use) and reduce confidence in medication efficacy and safety for 59 highly vulnerable residents. Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview, on August 12, 2025, at 3:16 PM, in the South Station medication room, with the Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN), the medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for three residents reviewed for puree diets (Resident 4, 46, and 79) when the incorrect portion size of pureed meatball was served for lunch on August 11, 2025. This failure has the potential to cause unintended weight loss (a noticeable decrease in body weight that occurs without conscious effort, such as dieting or exercising more), and inadequate nutritional needs (a state where the body doesn't receive enough of the essential nutrients it needs to function properly) for medically compromised Residents 4, 46 and 79 on puree diet (a modified diet where regular foods are transformed into a smooth, lump-free consistency, resembling pudding). Findings: During a review of the facility's Meal Distribution Report, it indicated Residents 4, 46, and 79 were on puree diet.During a review of the facility recipe for Meatballs / Marinara menu, it indicated Serve meat with a #8 scoop, topped with 4 oz (1/2 cup) of tomato sauce (1 cup total). An observation of the lunch tray line's puree…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the recipes were followed for puree (a modified diet where regular foods are transformed into a smooth, lump-free consistency, resembling pudding) diets for three residents reviewed for puree diet (Residents 4, 46, and 79) when the pureed lemon herb chicken, served for lunch on August 12, 2025, was crumbly and not smooth.This failure had the potential to cause choking and dissatisfaction for Residents 4, 46, and 79 who are medically compromised. Findings: During a review of the facility's Meal Distribution Report, it indicated Residents 4, 46, and 79 were on puree diet. During a review of the facility recipe for Lemon Herb Chicken, it indicated, Puree Diets: Place portions of meat needed into a food processor. Process to a fine texture. For every 5 portions. Prepare a slurry with 4 tbsp thickener and 1 cup hot liquid. Mix well with a wire whip. Add 1/2 of the slurry to the chicken. Process for 1 minute; if too dry, and more slurry until meat is pudding consistency.During a concurrent observation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to transmit discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 2 (Resident #16 and Resident #40) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for resident assessment. Findings included: A facility policy titled MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes, dated July 2017, indicated, Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. The policy indicated, 2. Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published in the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/2023, indicated, Discharge assessment refers to an assessment required on resident discharge from the facility. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #16 on 12/12/2023. According to the admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide conduct an assessment and monitor the provision of a nebulizer treatment for 1 (Resident #165) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Administering Medications through a Small Volume (Handheld) Nebulizer, revised in 10/2010, indicated, The purpose of this procedure is to safely and aseptically administer aerosolized particles of medication into the resident's airway. The policy specified, Documentation The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record. 1. The name, title and initials of the person administering the treatment. 2. The date, time and length of treatment (treatment administration record). 3. The type and amount of medication administered (medication administration record). 4. The type and source of gas. 5. Pulse, respiratory rate and lung sounds before and after treatment. 6. Pulse during treatment. 7. Amount and characteristics of sputum production. 8. The resident's tolerance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to monitor the dialysis fistula for 1 (Resident #165) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Hemodialysis Catheters - Access and Care of, revised in 02/2023, specified under the section titled, Care of AVFs [arteriovenous fistula] and AVGs [arteriovenous graft], 3. Care involves the primary goals of preventing infection and maintaining patency of the catheter (preventing clots). 4. To prevent infection and/or clotting: a. Keep access site clean at all times. b. Do not use the access site arm to take blood samples, administer IV [intravenous] fluids or give injections. c. Needle access for hemodialysis should be rotated. d. Check for signs of infection (warmth, redness, tenderness, or edema) at the access site when performing routine care and at regular intervals. e. Do not use the access arm to take blood pressure. f. Advise the resident not to sleep on, wear tight jewelry or lift heavy objects with the access arm. g. Check the color and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $868K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA