Willow Creek Healthcare Center
650 W. Alluvial, Clovis, CA 93611 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 159 certified beds · (559) 323-6200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 7 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $25,045 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-05)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.1% | 7.3% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.7% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.3% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.5% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.45 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.98 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 504 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 63.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 130 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.0%CMS range 52.4–62.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 8.1–11.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 59.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 58.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 5.5–10.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 159 beds and averages 152.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.70 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.31 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
62 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff immediately notified the physician for physical and mental health change of condition for one of three residents, Resident 1, when on 4/8/25 Registered Nurse (RN) 1 did not recognize the physical and mental health decline of Resident 1 brought to her attention by Resident 1's daughter who was at the bedside. RN 1 did not provide the necessary medical notification for the altered mental status of Resident 1, symptoms included inability to swallow medications which prompted RN 1 to perform an oral sweep with her fingers, Resident 1's inability to verbally respond, refused breakfast, lunch and dinner which were all changes to Resident 1's baseline condition. RN 1 did not provide a full accurate description and assessment to the physician when the physician was notified of Resident 1's change of condition.These failures resulted in further decline of Resident 1's clinical status until the evening of 4/8/25 when RN 2 notified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers (PU- a localized injury to the skin and underlying tissues) for one of four residents (Resident 1) when licensed nurses assessed Resident 1 upon admission on [DATE] and were aware of the Resident 1's high risk for pressure ulcers and did not implement effective interventions to prevent pressure ulcers such as changes for size, dimension, weekly description. Resident 1 was assessed to have a stage 2 (a partial-thickness skin injury that involves damage to the epidermis (outer layer of skin) and extends into the dermis (middle layer of skin) pressure ulcer on 5/5/25 and nurses did not implement interventions to prevent wound progression.Resident 1 was diagnosed by a wound specialist physician with an unstageable (a type of pressure injury where the depth of the wound cannot be determined because it is covered by slough or eschar. Slough is yellow,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , interview and record review, the facility failed to recognize and appropriately act on a change in condition for one of three sampled residents, Resident 1, when staff were provided a list of medications on Resident 1's admission on [DATE] that included insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose (a type of sugar) in the blood) and did not inform the physician. Nursing staff were aware of the diagnosis of diabetes (a disease that occurs when sugar in the blood is too high) and did not closely monitor symptoms of hyperglycemia (high blood sugar), nausea and malaise (general feeling of discomfort) and did not inform the physician of high blood glucose (sugar) measurements. These failures resulted in Resident 1 not being managed appropriately for diabetes, to not receive needed insulin medication to control high blood glucose, experienced several days of feeling unwell, nauseous and malaise and required emergently being transferred to an acute care hospital on 2/10/25. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified for a change in condition for one of three residents (Resident 1) when on 5/14/24 Resident 1 was observed to have an acute change in mental status, an abrupt loss of in appetite, weakness, fatigue, and was difficult to arouse. CNA 4 communicated the changes of Resident 1 to the licensed nurse and the license nurse did not assess the resident, did not notify the physician and the Responsible Party (RP-a decisionmaker for the resident) regarding the change in condition. This failure resulted in a delay in physician notification of a change in condition that occurred on 5/14/24 and did not provide the physician the resident assessment to diagnose promptly to treat or transfer Resident 1 to a higher level of care. The delay in physician notification lead to a delay in transferring to a general acute care hospital where Resident 1 ' s CT (computerized tomography x-ray image) scan results were consistent with an acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2019-05-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care to attain and maintain their highest practical wellbeing for two of four sampled residents (Resident 83, Resident 95) when: 1. Resident 83's nutritional needs were not accurately and consistently assessed on admission and as needed and effective interventions were not identified and implemented for weight loss. 2. Resident 83's assessment and nursing interventions to address pressure ulcer were not monitored and evaluated for effectiveness. 3.Resident 95's nutritional needs were not accurately and consistently assessed on admission and as needed and effective interventions were not identified and implemented for weight loss. These failures resulted in actual decline in physical wellbeing for Resident 83 and Resident 95. Findings: 1. During an observation in Resident 83's room, on 5/6/19, at 8:15 a.m., Resident 83 was in her room, in bed and sitting upright with her eyes closed. Resident 83's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2019-05-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents maintained their usual body weight for two of four sampled residents (Residents 83 and 95) when Registered Dietician (RD) did not conduct accurate nutritional assessments, communicate weight loss to interdisciplinary (IDT) team (members of the care team that include nurses, social workers, doctors, therapists and others) and implement effective actions and services to prevent significant weight loss. The RD and nursing staff failed to accurately document and monitor the daily meal consumption for Resident 83 and Resident 95. These failures resulted in Resident 83 experiencing a 47.9 pound (lbs.) weight loss or 36.7 percent weight loss over a period of 9 months. Resident 83 weighed 130 lbs. on admission on [DATE] and on 4/19/19 weighed 82 1b. For Resident 95 the failure resulted in a 25.3 lb. weight loss or 21.4 percent weight loss over a period of ten months. Resident 95 weighed 118 lbs. on admission on [DATE] and on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2019-05-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 83) remained free from developing pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and or underlying flesh usually over a bony area as a result of pressure/friction/shear) when Resident 83 had a known history of recurrent skin breakdown and was not repositioned every two hours and kept clean and dry as per the plan of care to prevent pressure ulcers. Resident 83 was bedridden following a fall that resulted in a hip fracture, after admission to the facility experienced a significant weight loss and nursing failed to conduct accurate skin risk assessments. This failure resulted in Resident 83 developing a preventable Stage 3 (Full thickness skin loss involving damage or necrosis of subcutaneous tissue that may extend down to, but not through, underlying fascia) pressure ulcer to the coccyx area (tailbone). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 83, on 5/6/19, at 8:15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to provide a safe and sanitary environment for seven of 16 sampled residents (Residents 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8) when:1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not discard soiled linens from Resident 2 who was on contact isolation (the practice of separating infected patients from others to prevent the spread of infections transmitted through direct or indirect contact) due to shingles (a painful rash illness caused by the varicella-zoster virus) to a designated isolation barrel (storage unit designed to contain infectious materials and waste) in the soiled utility room on 5/13/26 instead CNA 1 tossed Resident 2's soiled linens into a non-isolation red bin in the soiled utility room on 5/13/26. 2. Laundry Staff (LS) 1 left the blue barrel containing overflowing clean linens inside the dirty area of the laundry room on 5/13/26. These failures had the potential to cause cross…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to safeguard and protect residents' personal belongings from admission to discharge at the facility for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's personal belongings were not returned on 4/23/26 at discharge. This failure resulted in Resident 1's personal items missing at the time of discharge and for Resident 1's go without her personal belongings necessary to perform her activities of daily living (ADLs- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, mobility, and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves).Findings:During an interview on 5/13/26 at 2:23 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated social services were responsible for grievances (a complaint, either oral or written, expressing dissatisfaction with service delivery or the quality of care furnished) related to residents' missing personal belongings when searching the facility was not successful.During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when on 4/23/25 to 5/12/25 ertapenem sodium (antibiotic medication used to treat bacterial infections) medication was not administered via intravenous (IV- Into or within a vein) as prescribed for one of six residents (Resident 1) and no side effects were monitored during the administration of the IV antibiotic medication while in the facility. These failures resulted in Resident 1 not receiving antibiotics as prescribed by the provider and had the potential to contribute to his transfer to a general acute care hospital (GACH) on 5/11/25 and 5/13/25. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (a summary of important information regarding a patient which include patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 5/28/25, the admission record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for eight of 16 sampled residents (Residents 8,43, 62, 72, 95, 104, 108, and 110), when resident rooms had missing thresh holds (a strip of wood, metal, or stone forming the bottom of a doorway and crossed in entering a house or room), holes in the walls were not repaired, wall paper was torn and missing, blood stains and scuff marks were on the walls, strong urine odor, and curtains with blood stains were left hanging. Thes failures had the potential to cause emotional harm and frustration to the residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (AR), dated 4/14/25, the AR indicated Resident 8 was admitted from an acute care hospital on 7/17/24 with the following diagnosis, . history of falling, abnormality of gate, macular degeneration (age related disease that affects the center of the eye that can cause blurry, distorted or darkened center of vision), fracture of right humerus (long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for four of 24 sampled residents (Resident 17, 110, 203, 404) when: 1.Resident 110's care plan was not updated after droplet isolation (precaution taken for patients with known or suspected to be infected with pathogens transmitted by respiratory droplets that are generate by a patient who is coughing, sneezing or talking) was discontinued. This failure had the potential for Resident 110 to not receive person-centered care to meet his medical and nursing care needs. 2. Resident 17 was ordered and administered divalproex (medication used to treat seizure and prevent migraine headache) medication since 10/19/24 and did not have a care plan for the use of medication and diagnosis. This failure placed Resident 17 at risk of not meeting his care needs. 3. Resident 203 did not have specific care plan interventions developed for his use of the pain reliving medication oxycodone (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards of quality for seven of 32 sampled residents (36, 90, 97, 110, 138, 253 and 405) when: 1. Resident 405 had medication in a medicine cup on her bedside table (serves as a surface for food trays and can hold personal items such as phones, laptops, or books) without a self-administration of medications assessment completed, nor nursing staff present. This failure had the potential to put Resident 405 ' s and other facility residents, safety at risk and her specific needs not being met. 2. Resident 90 ' s Oxygen (O2) order was incomplete and did not specify how many liters (L- a unit of measurement) of O2 she was to receive per minute. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 90 to not receive the required amount of oxygen for her needs. 3. The facility failed to follow their Oxygen Administration Policy for one of five sampled residents (Resident 110) when the Oxygen in Use sign was not posted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with current accepted professional principles for three of 20 sampled residents (Resident 29, Resident 33 and Resident 79) when: 1. Resident 79 ' s brand name eye medication used to relieve dryness or pain in the mouth or throat solution was without an open date (date it was opened and first used) and Resident 29 ' s brand name insulin (medication used to control high blood sugar) was without an open date. This failure had the potential for Resident 79 and Resident 29 to receive expired medication and could have resulted in uncontrolled blood sugar, and eye irritation. 2. Resident 33 ' s lorazepam (medication used to control anxiety [a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness]) did not have a complete legible medication label. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 33 to be administered an incorrect dose of medication. 3. An unattended medication cart was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. The facility had a large clear plastic container with red gelatinous (jelly like substance) without any labels to identify product in container, open date or expiration date was in the kitchen refrigerator. 2. The facility had a large, opened container of mayonnaise without open date or expiration date was in the kitchen refrigerator. 3. The cook did not take the temperature of the tray of cauliflower taken out of the oven during the lunch tray line service. 4. The facility failed to store food in Resident 146's room in a safe manner. These failures had the potential for exposure of microorganisms (a microscopic organism, especially a bacterium, virus, or fungus) that harbor foodborne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease) of residents' food, staff lunch bags and cups resulting in food-borne illness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal for one of three outside trash bins, when one of the trash bins was uncovered, and a large amount of plastic and debris was noted on the ground behind the trash bin. This failure had the potential to attracts animals, insects and pests which could lead to infestations, unsanitary conditions, and the spread of disease. Findings: During an observation on 4/4/25 at 2:59 p.m., three of three trash bins were uncovered with paper and plastic bags littering the ground surrounding the bins. During an interview on 4/1/25 at 2:30 p.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the CDM stated, the trash bins should be closed at all times and there should not be trash on the ground or around the trash bins. The CDM stated, the open trash bin and trash on the ground around the trash bins could attract rats and bugs. During an interview on 4/2/25 at 2:45 p.m. with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the RD stated, the trash bins should always be closed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for six of 19 sampled residents (Residents' 36, 74, 115, 138, 361 and 554) when: 1.Resident 74 urinary catheter (flexible tube inserted into bladder to drain urine) bag was not covered and was visible to residents and visitors to see. 2. Registered Nurse (RN)1 and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 9 checked Resident 115 and Resident 361's blood pressure (B/P- measures the pressure of circulating blood against the walls of blood vessels [channels that carry blood throughout the body]) and did not provide privacy. 3. Licensed Vocation Nurse (LVN) 7 checked Resident 554's blood sugar (amount of sugar in the blood) and did not provide privacy. 4. Licensed Vocation Nurse (LVN) 7 administered insulin to Resident 36 and Resident 138 and did not provide privacy. These failures had the potential to violate Residents' 36, 74, 115, 138, 361 and 554 respect and dignity during direct resident care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report a alleged abuse incident to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) when two of six sampled residents (Resident 30 and Resident110) were involved in a resident-to-resident altercation without serious injury. This failure resulted in the facility not reporting the alleged violation involving resident to resident abuse within the required timeframe and had the potential for additional allegations of abuse to go unreported. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/1/25 at 3:02 p.m. with Resident 110 in the resident ' s room, Resident 110 was sitting on the edge of her bed facing the window. Resident 110 had six 1.5-inch adhesive strips (small bandages made of breathable material used as an alternative to stitches to help close small cuts and wounds) applied to her left hand. Resident 110 was alert, oriented to person, place, date and time, understood and answered questions appropriately. Resident 110…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS-assessment of physical and psychological functions and needs of residents) accurately reflected resident's health and functional status of one of four sampled residents (Resident 17) when Resident 17's use of anxiety medication and diagnoses of migraine was not accurately coded on the MDS assessment. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 17's care needs not met. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's admission Record (document with resident demographic and medical diagnosis information), dated 4/3/25, the AR indicated Resident 17 was admitted in the facility on 7/11/25 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's Disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), respiratory disorder and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- The State is required to ensure that every person entering a Medicaid certified Nursing Facility [NF] receives a admission level screening and if necessary a level ll evaluation to ensure that their NF residence is appropriate and to identify what specialized services they may need) was completed accurately for one of four sampled residents (Resident 17) when Resident 17 was admitted for hospice care on 11/14/24 and an updated PASRR was not completed. This failure had the potential for Resident 17 not to receive the necessary and appropriate psychiatric treatment and evaluation in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's admission Record [AR], dated 4/3/25, the AR indicated, Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's Disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 253) when Resident 253 did not have a care plan for oxygen (O2) andmedication ciprofloxacin (antibiotic medication used to treat bacterial infections in different parts of the body). This failure resulted in no baseline care plan to address the use of ciprofloxcin and had the potential for Resident 253 to not have her oxygen needs met. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/1/25 at 9:26 a.m. with Resident 253 in her room, Resident 253 was observed to be on oxygen (O2) at 3 liters(measurement) per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula (NC-tube used to administer via the nose). Resident 253 stated, I haven ' t always had oxygen; just since my hospitalization. During a review of Resident 253 ' s admission Record (AR) dated 4/3/25, the AR indicated, Resident 253 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 128) was free from accidents, when Resident 128 was smoking and had ashes fall on her shirt and into her wheelchair. This failure put Resident 128 ' s safety at risk and the ashes had the potential to burn the resident. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/2/25 at 11:40 a.m., with Resident 128, Resident 404, Activities Assistant (AA) 2 and AA 1, outside in the atrium designated smoking area of the facility, Resident 128 smoked two cigarettes and dropped ashes on her shirt and between her legs on her wheelchair. AA 2 was sitting on a bench to the right of the resident conversating with both residents and another Activities Assistant (AA 1). Resident 128 brushed the ashes off her body with her hand that had a cigarette in it. Resident 128 was not wearing a smoking apron and stated she was not offered one prior to smoking. During a review of Resident 128's admission Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for two of nine sampled residents (Resident 20 and Resident 8) when: 1. Resident 20 was not served pureed (food that are pudding-like texture that is smooth, blended) banana and had a physician order for a pureed diet. This failure placed residents with difficulty chewing and swallowing and, on a physician, prescribed pureed diet at risk of choking. 2. Resident 8 served minced meat for lunch on 4/1/25 instead of regular textured diet as ordered by medical doctor (MD). This failure had the potential for Resident 8 to not eat her food which could result to weight loss. Findings: 1.During a concurrent observation and record review on 4/1/25 at 12:15 p.m. with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 4 and Resident 20 in the assisted dining room, Resident 20 ' s lunch meal ticket was reviewed. The meal ticket indicated Resident 20 ' s diet order: pureed, fortified, thin liquids, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 102) had access to a call light when the tap button (a large square button that can be easily triggered by pressure from a hand, elbow used when residents have limited finger strength) call light was found hanging off the left handrail three inches above the floor. This failure resulted in Resident 102 not being able to directly call for help. Findings: During an observation on 4/1/25 at 8:08 a.m. with Resident 102 in the resident's room, Resident 102 laid asleep in bed. Resident 102's bed had an air mattress, and the head of the bed was elevated while enteral feeding (nutrition delivered using the gut) infused as it hung from the intravenous (IV-within the vein) pole at the right side of the bed. Resident 102 tap button call light hung from the left handrail inches above the floor. During a review of Resident 102's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was accessible for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) when Resident 1 and Resident 3's call light was not within reach on 12/26/2024. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 1 and Resident 3 not being able to access their call light when they needed help and assistance with their activities of the daily living. Findings: During concurrent observation and interview on 12/26/2024 at 2:23 p.m. with Resident 1, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1's call light was wrapped around to the assist bar on the left side of the bed. Resident 1 was looking for his call light and was unable to find his call light. Resident 1 stated he needed his call light, and he used his call light when he needed help but was unable to reach it to call for help. During concurrent observation and interview on 12/27/2024 at 2:32 p.m. in Resident 1's room, with the Director of Staff and Development (DSD), the DSD validated that Resident 1's call light was wrapped around the assist bar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain infection prevention and control procedures for four of four sampled shower areas when: 1.Station 1-The women ' s shower had a pair of used gloves and washcloth in the soap bar holder, brown colored substance on the washcloth. The drains had loose hair buildup with paper debris. The men ' s shower had a brown colored substance on the grab bar near toilet seat, a uncovered toilet plunger located beside toilet had a white dried substance on it. A package of wipes used to clean a resident was open and on the floor. 2.Station 2 – The men and women ' s shower drains had dark and grey colored hair and debris in them. The tile floor in women ' s shower had dark brown colored tracks along floor. 3.Station 3- The men and women ' s shower drains had dark and grey colored hair and plastic and paper debris in them. 4. room [ROOM NUMBER] shower drain had hair and debris in the shower and the bedside commode had chipped paint with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents, Resident 1, was free from abuse when Resident 1 expressly stated to Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 not to check his brief (product used to absorb urine) on 6/7/24. CNA 1 checked Resident 1's brief twice without his permission and in the process physically touched Resident 1's genitals (sexual organs located outside the body). These failures resulted in not honoring Resident 1's expressed refusal of care and could be considered physical and sexual abuse. Resident 1 felt violated, angry, humiliated, and disrespected. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (document containing resident demographic information and medical diagnosis) undated, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnosis included Acquired Absence of Right Leg Below Knee (cutting off leg below the knee), End Stage Renal Disease (a medical condition in which a person's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of alleged abuse to the state agency, ombudsman and local law enforcement within the required 24-hour time frame for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when on 6/7/24, Resident 1 reported to Licensed Vocation Nurse (LVN) 1 that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 violated him. This failure led to the allegation of abuse on 6/7/24 to go unnoticed and unreported by the facility until 6/17/24. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive and physical function) Assessment dated 6/15/24, it indicated Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS -assessment of memory and judgment) assessment score was 15 (a score of 13-15 indicates cognitively intact, 08-12 indicates moderately impaired, 00-07 indicates severe impairment, 99 severely impaired). The BIMS assessment indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 6/21/24 at 11:24 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective infection control and prevention program for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2), when Certified Nursing Assistance (CNA) was observed without proper personal protective equipment (PPE-equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illnesses) and not performing hand hygiene (washing hand or using alcohol base hand rub) while providing care on 6/4/24. This failure had the potential to place Resident 2 at increased risk for an infection with multidrug resistant organisms (MRDO- bacteria (germs) that have developed resistance to multiple types of antibiotics) and had the potential transit infection throughout the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record (AR), dated 5/4/24, the AR indicated, Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Covid -19 (a highly infection respiratory disease) immunodeficiency (the decreased ability of the body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1 ) was assessed for the risk of entrapment (resident caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed and side rail) from bed (side) rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars in various sizes that attach to the bed, and can be placed in a guard (raised) or lowered position) prior to installation when Resident 1 had no entrapment risk assessment, physician order, and care plans prior to the use of side rails. These failures had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for decreased freedom of movement, entrapment and/or injury. Findings: 1. During an observation on 5/14/24 at 9:28 a.m., with Resident 1, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was lying in bed with two bed rails up. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/14/24 at 10:05 a.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was lying in bed with two bed rails up. CNA 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services which met professional standards for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2's oxygen (a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas essential to living) flow rate (the amount of oxygen being delivered to the body) was not administered according to the physician order (an order given for specific patient/resident by a health care provider). This failure resulted in Resident 2 oxygen to not be administer according to the physician order. Findings: During a review of Resident 2s admission Record (document containing resident demographic information and medical diagnosis), dated 4/29/24, the admission Record indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 2 ' s diagnosis included .ESSENTIAL (PRIMARY) HYPERTENSION (occurs when you have abnormally high blood pressure that's not the result of a medical condition) .CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (a group of diseases that cause airflow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff washed or sanitized their hands before they put on gloves during meal preparation. This had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled, Food Preparation and Service, revised November 2022, revealed 2. Cross-contamination can occur when harmful substances, i.e. [id est, a Latin term that meant, that is] chemical or disease-causing microorganisms are transferred to food by hands (including gloved hands), food contact surfaces, sponges, cloth towels, or utensils that are not adequately cleaned. During an observation on 03/05/2024 beginning at 10:35 AM, [NAME] #2 was noted to not wash or sanitize her hands before she put on gloves to prepare a pan of lasagna. During an observation on 03/05/2024 beginning at 11:09 AM, [NAME] #3 removed her gloves, and did not wash or sanitize her hands before she put a pair of clean gloves on to finish preparation of a batch of cookies. In an interview on 03/07/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 dumpsters were closed and the area around them was free of trash and debris to prevent the potential for vermin and pest attraction. This had the potential to affect all 155 residents who currently resided in the facility. Findings included: A review of facility policy titled, Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal, revised in October 2017, revealed, 7. Outside dumpsters provided by garbage pickup services will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter. During a tour of the facility dumpsters on 03/05/2024 at 3:57 PM, the surveyor noted there were five dumpsters, all with opened lids. There was scattered trash and debris on the ground that surrounded the dumpsters to include, plastic bags, gloves, a cup, a sandwich bag labeled peanut butter and jelly and dated 03/04/2024, a pastry wrapper, a large empty tin of Mandarin oranges, and a pint size empty carton of milk. During an interview on 03/07/2024 at 11:13 AM, the Housekeeping Director stated he and the staff of the dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) level I screening for 1 (Resident #108) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for PASARR. Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled, admission Criteria - PASRR [preadmission screening and resident review], revised in March 2019, revealed, 9. All new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID), or related disorders per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review process. a. The facility conducts a Level I PASARR screen for all potential admissions, regardless of payor source, to determine if the individual meets the criteria for a MD, ID or RD. A review of Resident #108's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 02/01/2023, with diagnoses that included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A review of Resident #108's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Level I Screening, dated 02/02/2023, revealed the resident did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and document reviews, the facility failed to provide an activity program that met the needs of 1 (Resident #304) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for activities. Findings included: A review of Resident #304's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 09/25/2023. Per the admission Record, on 02/19/2024, the resident received a diagnosis of Escherichia (E) coli. A review of Resident #304's Activity Assessment, dated 09/28/2023, revealed the resident enjoyed arts and crafts, swimming, and spending time with their best friend. Per the Activity Assessment, the resident's preferred activities in the activity room and in their room. A review of Resident #304's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/042024, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #304's Order Summary Report, for active orders as of 03/07/2024, revealed an order dated 02/20/2024 that indicated the resident was on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prepare enough food to ensure the planned menu was served for 1 (Resident #8) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for food. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Resident Food Preferences, revised in July 2017, revealed, 10. The Food Services Department will offer a variety of foods at each scheduled meal, as well as access to nourishing snacks throughout the day and night. A review of Resident #8's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 08/19/2011, with diagnoses that included nutritional anemia, disease of the stomach and duodenum, and history of peptic ulcer disease. A review of Resident #8's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/18/2023, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. In an interview on 03/04/2024 at 10:59 AM, Resident #8 stated they did not always receive what was on the planned menu. According to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standard of practice for two of six sampled residents (Resident 5 and 6) when facility staff did not follow the physician's order to administer nystatin powder (a medication to treat skin infections). This failure had the potential to cause Resident 5 and 6 to experience moisture associated skin damage to the abdominal folds, armpit, breast, and groin area. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/3/22, at 10: 35 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, a document titled, Medication Administration Record, dated 11/3/23 was reviewed. The document indicated, Nystatin Powder 100,000 UNIT/GM [unit per gram - unit of measurement] Apply to groin, abdominal folds, armpits topically every shift for [Incontinence Associated Skin Damage/Moisture Associated Skin Disorder] . Start Date – 5/12/22 11/29/22 . Night . [blank, missing licensed nurse ' s initial] . LVN 2 stated, Resident 5 ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the residents representative (RP) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when licensed staff did not notify the resident representative (RP) of Resident 1 ' s altered mental status (a disruption of a person ' s normal mental function) and his transfer to an acute care hospital (a facility that provides treatment for a severe injury or illness) on 7/7/23. This failure resulted in Resident 1 ' s RP not being aware on 7/7/23 of Resident 1 ' s transfer and change in his medical condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (document containing resident demographic information and medical diagnosis), dated 7/24/23, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1 ' s diagnosis included but not limited to . SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER (a disorder that includes symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations, depressed episodes, and manic periods of high energy) . CHRONIC PAIN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six residents (Resident 2) was treated respect and dignity, when Resident 2 ' s fingernails were long with black and brown matter under the fingernails. This failure resulted in the facility not promoting the rights of Resident 2 to a dignified and respectful existence and had the potential to compromise her health and well-being. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/2/22, at 11:50 a.m., with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1, in Resident 2 ' s room, Resident 2 was lying in bed with both hands on top of the bedsheet cover. CNA 1 stated, Resident 2 ' s fingernails on both hands were long with black and brown matter under the fingernails. CNA 1 stated, CNAs were responsible in keeping resident ' s fingernails clean at all times. CNA 1 stated, the facility failed to keep Resident 2 ' s fingernails clean. CNA 1 stated, Resident 2 uses her hands to eat her meals, and the dirty fingernails could cause skin infection and stomach problems such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a system to oversee grievances in accordance with their policy and procedure (P&P) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility ' s Social Services Designee (SSD, designated Grievance Official) did not oversee, document, track, and investigate grievances filed by Resident 1. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 not being able to exercise his rights and lack of proper action to resolve his grievances. Findings: During a phone interview on 10/31/22, at 9:00 a.m., with Family Member (FM) 1, FM 1 stated, she filed a written grievance on 10/6/22 with the Social Service Designee (DSD) and was informed that her complaints would be investigated and she would be notified on the outcome of the investigation. FM 1 stated, her husband [Resident 1] received poor care from the staff that resulted in his hospitalization and eventually receiving three units of blood (a procedure in which donated blood are given through an intravenous line). FM 1 stated, she left multiple messages for the SSD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when two of six sampled residents ' (Residents 3 and 4) oxygen concentrator (a device that concentrates the oxygen from the ambient air) filters were found covered with lint and dust. This failure placed Resident 3 and 4 at an increased risk to develop respiratory and healthcare-associated infections. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/2/22, at 12:08 p.m., in Resident 3 ' s room, Resident 3 had an oxygen cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen) connected to an oxygen concentrator. The oxygen was operating at 3L/min (LPM-Liters Per Minute, unit of measurement). The oxygen concentrator dust filter was covered with white and gray material. Resident 3 stated, the dirty oxygen concentrator was not acceptable and he wanted the oxygen concentrator dust filter to be clean as soon as possible. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/2/22, at 12:23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-05-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food safely when: 1. The kitchen bread rack in dry storage area stored a loaf of garlic bread wrapped in foil, with a date which indicated best [used] by 4/30/19; a loaf of rye bread opened in a plastic bag with no written open date; four bags of hot dog buns taken out of the original packaging with no open date written. 2. A bag of chicken meat was not labeled and dated in the walk-in freezer. These failures placed residents at risk for food borne illness and growth of microorganisms (bacteria). Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Account Dietary Manager (DM), on 5/6/19, at 8:10 a.m., in the dry storage room, the following items were observed without an open date label or used by date: rye bread in a plastic bag, 4 packages of hot dog buns in a plastic bag. The Registered Dietician (RD) stated any open bag/packages needed to be dated. On the bread rack was a package of garlic bread which indicated best by 4/30/19. The date was verified by the DM and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-05-17 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a facility-wide assessment specific to the facility needs when facility assessment did not include a water management plan. This practice failed to establish an individualized facility assessment to meet the requirement for a water management plan which had the potential for water borne bacteria exposure to the residents including Legionella (disease is a severe form of pneumonia - lung inflammation usually caused by infection, caused by a bacterium known as legionella. most people get legionnaires' disease from inhaling the bacteria in showers, water facets, water fountain) in an event of an outbreak. Findings: During a concurrent facility document review and interview with the Maintenance Director (MD), on 5/7/19, at 12:27 p.m., he stated the facility had a water management plan that he developed. The water management plan undated indicated, . Water Management Plan Committee . 1. [MD] . Maintenance . 2. [blank] .3. [blank] . 7. [blank] . Building Water System . 1. Building connects to . Vendor . Utility vendor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-05-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI -is the specification of standards for quality of service and outcomes, a process throughout the organization for assuring that care is maintained at acceptable levels in relation to those standards, aims to improve processes involved in health care delivery and resident quality of life) program when: 1. The QAPI program did not develop and implement a water management program as part of the Infection Control Program (cross reference F 838 and F 880). This failure resulted in the facility not having a program in place to reduce the risk of water borne illnesses including Legionella (disease is a severe form of pneumonia - lung inflammation usually caused by infection, caused by a bacterium known as legionella. most people get legionnaires' disease from inhaling the bacteria in showers, water facets, water fountain). 2. The QAPI program did not develop a system of identifying and monitoring residents with weight loss and implement effective interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-05-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when: 1. Wet kitchen towels/rags were hung on a rack on top of one another to air dry and wet towels were touching the kitchen floor. 2. The kitchen did not have a system to monitor the sanitation solution of the red sanitation water buckets used to sanitize the work surface areas used to prepare food. 3. The facility failed to have a facility-wide assessment that addressed the federal expectation to develop a water management program for the risk reduction of Legionella (a water borne bacteria which can cause life threatening pneumonia) and other water-borne pathogens (germs that cause disease) in accordance with CMS letter revision date 7/6/18. These failures placed the residents at risk for cross contamination, infection and potential for not identifying risk to water borne illnesses such as Legionella (Disease is a severe form of pneumonia - lung inflammation usually caused by infection, caused by a bacterium known as legionella. most people…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-05-17 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of the resident transfer and discharge notification to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (an official appointed to represent the elderly and frail's rights under public authorities) for two of five sampled residents (Resident 104 and Resident 338) when: 1. Resident 104 was transferred for hospitalization. 2. Resident 338 was transferred for hospitalization. These failures had the potential to result in inappropriate resident transfer and discharge practices for Resident 104 and Resident 338. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 104's Electronic Medical Record with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, on 5/7/19, at 3:47 p.m., she stated Resident 104 had been hospitalized three times this year (2019). LVN 1 stated, The hospitalization dates are 1/8/19, 1/25/19 and 2/8/19. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 104, the admission Record dated 5/8/19, indicated he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement the plan of care to reflect the care needs for three of 30 sampled residents (Residents 2, 33, and 74): 1. For Resident 33, the facility failed to develop a side rail care plan (a plan that provides direction for individualized care of the resident). 2. For Residents 2 and 74, the facility failed to implement the activities care plan when one-to-one in room visits were not followed. These failures placed the residents at risk of not receiving appropriate, consistent, and individualized care interventions to ensure their well-being. Findings: 1. During an observation on 5/6/19, at 8:21 a.m., in the resident's room, Resident 33 was lying in bed asleep. Resident 33 was observed to have three one-half side rails elevated on the bed. Resident 33's left side of the bed was observed with upper and lower side rails elevated, and the right side of the bed was observed with an upper one-half side rail elevated. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-05-17 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the food services staff had appropriate competencies or safely and effectively carry out the functions of food services when [NAME] 1 and [NAME] 3 were unable to verbalize the thermometer calibration process. This failure had the potential for untrained staff to place residents at risk of exposure to foodborne illnesses. Findings: During an interview with [NAME] 1, on 5/7/19, at 10:25 a.m., [NAME] was preparing to check food temperatures. [NAME] 1 did not calibrate the food thermometer prior to placing the thermometer in the hot meat dish. [NAME] 1 was unable to verbalize the calibration of the kitchen thermometer used to check the temperature of food. [NAME] 1 did not know the required low temperature of the thermometer in order to accurately perform the calibration. During an interview with [NAME] 3, on 5/7/19, at 10:28 a.m., she was unable to verbalize the calibration of the kitchen thermometer used to check the temperature of the food. During interview with the Account Dietary Manager (DM), on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-05-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of medical records for five of 30 sampled residents (Residents 2, 74, 64, 84, and 109) when: 1. Resident 2's independent activities were documented as watching television in her room, when there was no television available for the resident. 2. Resident 74's physician orders indicated resident was receiving hospice (end of life treatment and care) services and the hospice services were discontinued but not reflected on the physician's order report summary. 3. Resident 84's physicians' orders dated 5/1/19 inaccurately indicated appointment scheduled with orthopedic (bone specialist) physician for splint (broken bone stabilizer) treatment and rehabilitation services when those services had been discontinued. 4. Resident 109's physicians' orders dated 5/1/19 inaccurately indicated laboratory order for TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone - help the thyroid produce hormones) and orders for Fingerstick (checking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-05-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating condition when: 1. Five of 24 resident beds had controls that did not work and made squeaking noises. This failure resulted in resident beds that were not safe and fully operational for Residents 14, 75, 27, 87 and 104. 2. There was ice buildup inside the walk in freezer on the plastic freezer door curtains and inside part of the door. This failure had the potential to impact the ability of dietary staff to prepare, store, and serve food in a safe and sanitary manner. Findings: During an interview with the Maintenance Director (MD), on 5/7/19, at 11:35 a.m., MD stated he was not aware of any beds that made an abnormal noise (squeak). The MD stated, I don't do regular maintenance . I just wait until somebody tells me that there is something wrong with the bed. During a concurrent observation and interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2, on 5/9/19, at 9:38 a.m., in Resident 14's room, CNA 2 tested Resident 14's bed. Resident 14 was in bed and gave CNA 2 permission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents right to privacy of medical records for one of 28 residents (Resident 93) when Resident 93's personal and medical information was exposed for anyone to see. This failure resulted in the violation of Resident 93's right to privacy and confidentiality of his medical information. Findings: During an observation on 5/7/19, at 8:26 a.m., in Station 3 Nurses' Station, there was a medication cart by the hallway with the computer open. Resident 93's picture and name was on the screen with his list of medications in view. There was no licensed nurse near the medication cart. During an interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, on 5/7/19, at 8:28 a.m., she stated, I am so sorry. I knew better than that to leave it [computer] open. LVN 3 stated the computer was not to be left open exposing resident personal information. LVN 3 stated, It is a confidentiality issue . You can't expose the resident's information . I took out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable and homelike environment for two of 20 sampled residents (Resident 123 and Resident 14) when: 1. Resident 123's bed made loud noises whenever bed repositioning was done and the mattress had lumps which were uncomfortable for Resident 123. 2. Resident 14's bed made a loud noise whenever the bed was lowered. This failure resulted in an uncomfortable and un-homelike environment for Resident 123 and Resident 14. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/7/19, at 11:03 a.m., there was a loud creaking noise heard in the hallway in Station 3. The noise came from Resident 123's room. Resident 123 stated, It's my bed, it is the bottom [half] part of the bed. It squeaks all the time . I hate it. I have to adjust it [bed] to make me feel better. I have to keep adjusting it . Resident 123 stated she told the Maintenance Director (MD) about the squeaky noise. Resident 123 stated, The bed has lumps on it. They told me they were going to give me a new mattress. Resident 123…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of cognitive and functional needs) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one of five sampled residents (Resident 104) when Resident 104's thickened liquid diet and oxygen therapy was not coded in Sections K and O. These failures resulted in an inaccurate assessment of Resident 104's MDS assessment and had the potential to result in Resident 104's care needs not being met. Findings: During an observation on 5/6/19, at 9:08 a.m., in Resident 104's room, Resident 104 was sitting in bed eating breakfast with his oxygen cannula (a plastic tubing used for the delivery of oxygen through the nose) on his lap. The oxygen was running at 1L/min (liters per minute - flow rate of oxygen). During a review of the clinical record for Resident 104, the admission Record dated 5/8/19, indicated he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with current diagnoses that included pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services which met professional standards of quality when physician's diet orders were not followed for three of five sampled residents (Resident 57, Resident 91, and Resident 104). 1. For Resident 57, the facility failed to follow physician's diet order for a regular textured diet during lunch meal service on 5/6/19 which result in Resident 57 receiving a mechanical diet instead of a regular diet. 2. For Resident 91, the facility failed to follow physician's diet order for thick liquids (thickened to nectar-thick consistency liquids) when the resident received tea without thickening. For Resident 91 this failure had the potential to result in choking and potential risk for lung infection from aspiration (food or liquid going into the windpipe). 3. For Resident 104, the facility failed to follow physician's diet order for thick liquids (thickened to nectar-thick consistency liquids) when Resident 104 received coffee without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide individualized and ongoing activity programs to meet the needs and interests of two of six residents (Residents 2 and 74). For Residents 2 and 74 the facility failed to provide in room one-to-one visits which had the potential for the residents to experience social isolation. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 2, on 9/6/19, at 9:24 a.m. in the resident's room, Resident 2 was lying in bed. Resident stated she did not like group activities and preferred to do independent activities in her room. Resident 2 stated she liked to watch television, but did not have a television in the room. Resident 2's room was observed with no visible television on bed stand or bedside table. During an observation on 5/6/19, at 10:40 a.m., in the resident's room, Resident 2 was sitting up in bed asleep. No visible television was present for the resident. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/6/19, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the policy and procedure for dialysis (procedure to remove wastes and excess fluids from the body) was followed and professional standards of quality were met when one of two sampled residents (Residents 128) did not have documentation of completed post-dialysis assessments on multiple dates. For Resident 128, this failure increased the potential for the delayed detection, reporting, and/or management of complications from the hemodialysis (dialysis done through the blood vessel) access sites. Findings: During an observation on 5/6/19, at 8:05 a.m., in resident's room, Resident 128 was seated at the edge of bed eating breakfast and declined to talk. Resident had a dressing on the left upper arm. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 128, the admission Record dated 5/8/19, indicated Resident 128 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included End Stage Renal Disease (kidneys no longer function, needing dialysis).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-17 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 33) remained free from accident hazards when Resident 33's bed had three elevated side rails instead of one elevated side rail as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to place Resident 33 at risk for entrapment and serious injury. Findings: During an observation on 5/6/19 at 8:21 a.m. in the resident's room, Resident 33 was lying in bed asleep. Resident 33 was observed to have three one half side rails elevated on the bed. Resident 33's left side of the bed was observed with upper and lower side rails elevated, and the right side of the bed was observed with an upper one half side rail elevated. During an observation on 5/6/19, at 10:23 a.m., in the resident's room, Resident 33 had three one half side rails elevated. Resident 33's left side of the bed had one half upper and lower side rails elevated, and the right side of the bed had the upper one half side rail…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-17 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were signed and dated by the attending physician in a timely manner for one of three sampled residents (Resident 45). This failure had the potential for inconsistent care coordination due to inaccurate and incomplete records. Findings: During a review of the clinical record for Resident 45, the physician's orders (PO) for the month of February, March & April, 2019 were missing the signature of the attending physician and were labeled with at least one sign here red tag in each of the month on the last page of the PO. During concurrent interview and record review with the Health Information Manager (HIM), on 5/17/19, at 6:00 p.m., she reviewed the PO for Resident 45 for the month of February, March and April, 2019, and stated the PO were not signed by the attending physician. The HIM stated she does audit and verbally reported to the Director of Nursing (DON) of the missing physician signatures for Resident 45's medication and treatment orders. During an interview with the DON, on 5/17/19, at 6:25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs stored were labeled in accordance with the facility Accessing a Multiple-Dose Vial policy and procedure for one of three sampled residents (Resident 47) when Resident 47's open insulin glargine (medication used to treat high blood sugar) pen (a device used to inject insulin) was stored in the medication cart without an open date. This failure had the potential to place Resident 47 at risk of receiving expired insulin which could lead to ineffective control of blood sugar and adverse reactions from expired medication. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4, on [DATE], at 3:35 p.m., she obtained an insulin pen from the medication cart on Station 2. LVN 4 stated the insulin glargine pen was not labeled with an open date and it should be labeled. LVN 4 compared the undated insulin glargine pen from the unused insulin glargine pen from the medication room refrigerator and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-17 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure routine dental services were provided for one of four sampled residents (Resident 45). This failure had the potential to result in dental problem that could result in unintended weight loss and oral infection. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 45 and her daughter in station 1 dining room on 5/15/19, at 6:13 p.m., Resident 45 was sitting in Geri chair, holding a cup with coffee and her meal tray in front of her. The daughter was feeding her. Resident 45 meal tray consist of two cups of broth soup, plate with pureed meatloaf, pureed bread, milk shake and a small bowl of apple sauce. Resident had no teeth. Resident 45's daughter stated the Registered Nurse (RN) and Registered Dietician (RD) from the facility called and notified her about the weight loss and giving her the option of placing gastric tube (feeding thru the stomach) and she declined and told them she wants her mother to have dentures and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve thicken liquids in a form designed to meet individual resident needs and as ordered by the physician for two or four residents (Residents 104 and 91) when their drink (coffee and tea) were not thickened. These failures placed Residents 104 and Resident 91 at risk of choking on liquid and potential risk for lung infections from aspiration (food or liquid going into the windpipe). Findings: 1.During an observation on 5/6/19, at 9:08 a.m., Resident 104 was I his room eating his breakfast. Resident 104's breakfast consisted of partially eaten scrambled eggs, thickened milk, oatmeal and regular consistency coffee on the side table. Resident 104 stated, I can't drink it (coffee) like this. During a review of Resident 104's meal slip dated 5/6/19, indicated . Regular/Liberalized [includes individual's food preferences] - Dys Adv [Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) Advance], Chop Mt [Meat] . Nectar [consistency] Like Liquids . During a review of the clinical record for Resident 104, the Order Summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-17 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician prescribed diets for three of five sampled residents (Resident 57, Resident 91, and Resident 104). 1. For Resident 57, the facility failed to follow physician's diet order for regular textured diet during lunch meal service on 5/6/19 which result in Resident 57 receiving the wrong prescribed lunch meal. 2. For Resident 91, the facility failed to follow physician's diet order for thick liquids (thickened to nectar-thick consistency liquids) which had the potential to result in choking and potential risk for lung infection from aspiration (food or liquid going into the windpipe). 3. For Resident 104, the facility failed to follow physician's diet order for thick liquids (thickened to nectar-thick consistency liquids) which had the potential to result in choking and potential risk for lung infection from aspiration. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 57, on 5/6/19, at 12:40 p.m., Resident 57 was served her lunch tray by Minimum Data Set Coordinator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$25,045 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $15,935 — penalty dated 2026-01-05
- $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-09-24
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-12 for 6 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROVIDENCE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/11/2019 |
| SOOD, PAWAN | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/01/2020 |
| CANTWELL, KALAN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555652. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.