No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cottonwood Canyon Healthcare Center

1391 Madison Avenue, El Cajon, CA 92021 · For profit - Corporation · 96 certified beds · (619) 444-1107 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (619) 444-1107 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$9,110 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $9,110 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-12)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1319 E Main St · (619) 447-6001 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.4 mi
215 N 2nd St · (619) 401-0761 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1435 E Main St · (619) 440-1423 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1291 E Main St · (619) 905-0584 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.1%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.9%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms22.9%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.7%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.7%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.5%10.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.6%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.3%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.0%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.812.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.861.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
76.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.63U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.31hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 76.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.4%CMS range 38.9–60.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 7.5–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge76.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge72.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge57.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.6–12.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.531.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
1.08
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.47
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.02
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
40.4%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 90.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-12)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2021-07-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

58 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility left Resident 1 alone with a meal tray and did not provide feeding assistance or supervision to Resident 1 who had been assessed and identified as requiring feeding assistance and supervision (according to the facility's nutritional care plan). The facility also failed to provide adequate (one on one supervision) for Resident 1 who was assessed as a high risk for a fall and did not implement appropriate fall-prevention interventions (based on assessment of Resident 1's individual needs), for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).As a result, Resident 1 required emergency services, was hospitalized , sustained a head injury, sustained a spinal L4 compression fracture, (break in the fourth lumbar vertebra lower back, the part of your spine with five strong bones that support your upper body's weight) was intubated, (a plastic tube is inserted into a person's windpipe/trachea to open and to deliver oxygen, via a breathing machine called a ventilator)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-08-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 2 sampled resident's, reviewed for abuse, were free from physical abuse when (Resident 1) was physically assaulted by another resident (Resident 2). This failure resulted in the following: 1.Resident 1 had pain, bleeding, and a laceration on top of his right eyebrow, bruising of the face and a small cut on top of his nose. 2. Resident 1 was transferred to a general acute care hospital due to right eye pain and was diagnosed with a nasal fracture (break in bone) with overlying soft tissue swelling (bruising) and periorbital (tissues lining the eye socket) hematoma (area of blood that collects outside the vessels). 3. Resident 1 underwent suturing (to close the wound) of two-centimeter (cm) lacerations over the right eyebrow and a one cm laceration of the right lower lid. 4.Resident 1 received a tetanus vaccine (an injection to prevent infection caused by bacteria called Clostridium tetani. When these bacteria enter the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe use of mechanical lift equipment (Hoyer lift) for resident transfers for one resident (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents requiring mechanical lift transfers. Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated, he was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included Osteitis Deformans (a chronic disorder that disrupts the normal recycling process of bone tissue) and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis (hemiplegia indicated by partial or total paralysis and hemiparesis indicated by weakness on one side of the body). A review of Resident 1's care plan dated, 2/10/26 indicated, use Hoyer lift with appropriate sling for all transfers, lock brakes, position patient safely, and monitor during transfers. On 4/15/26 at 10:40 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 stated an incident occurred on 12/15/25 when he landed on the floor during a transfer from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) to reflect the resident's true injury status following a fall, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).As a result, this placed Resident 1 at risk for inaccurate care planning, inappropriate monitoring and follow up, and the transmission of incorrect health information to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).Cross-reference F689Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included history of Intellectual Developmental Disability (IDD-is a condition that limits intelligence and disrupts abilities necessary for living independently).A record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-nursing facility assessment tool) dated 12/25/25 indicated that Resident 1 was rarely or never understood with severe cognitive (the mental processes that take place in the brain, including thinking, attention, language,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop, revise and implement an individualized, person-centered care plan to address supervision, prevent falls and feeding assistance needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at risk for falls, choking, serious injury and delayed emergency response due to the lack of an individualized and implemented care plan that aligned with Resident 1's needs when:1. Resident 1, who was a high fall-risk resident, was left unsupervised, despite requiring close monitoring the comprehensive care plan lacked personalization specific to Resident 1's needs that are clear, specific, and measurable interventions to ensure continuous one on one (1:1) supervision.2. Staff failed to provide feeding assistance to Resident 1 according to the nutritional care plan, even though the resident was identified as requiring 1:1 feeding assistance that required assistance with meals.Cross-Reference F689 and F7261. Fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate emergency respiratory interventions, including providing rescue breaths or assisted ventilation (movement of air in and out of the lungs), for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at risk for hypoxia (low oxygen levels), and respiratory arrest.Cross-Reference F726 and F689Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included history of Intellectual Developmental Disability (IDD-is a condition that limits intelligence and disrupts abilities necessary for living independently).A record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-nursing facility assessment tool) dated [DATE] indicated that Resident 1 was rarely or never understood with severe cognitive (the mental processes that take place in the brain, including thinking, attention, language, learning, memory, and perception) deficits to understand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff assigned to high fall-risk residents were competent, informed, and trained to meet the residents' safety and care needs, for one of three residents sampled (Resident 1) when:1. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) rescue breaths was not provided and only oxygen via a non-rebreather mask was administered when Resident 1 was found unresponsive with irregular breathing, and oxygen saturation was not registering on pulse oximetry (device that measures blood oxygen saturation/levels) .2. Resident 1, who was a high fall-risk resident, was left unsupervised, despite requiring close monitoring.3. Staff failed to provide feeding assistance to Resident 1, even though the resident was identified as requiring feeding assistance on a feeding assist list and required assistance with meals.As a result, this placed Resident 1 at risk for harm, including inadequate emergency response, respiratory compromise, falls with injury, choking or aspiration, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain accurate, complete and reliable medical records that reflected the actual care provided during an emergency event, for one of three residents (Resident 1).This deficient practice placed (Resident 1) at risk for delayed or inappropriate medical treatment, misinformed clinical decision-making and compromised continuity of care.Cross reference F689Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included history of Intellectual Developmental Disability (IDD-is a condition that limits intelligence and disrupts abilities necessary for living independently).A record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-nursing facility assessment tool) dated [DATE] indicated that Resident 1 was rarely or never understood with severe cognitive (the mental processes that take place in the brain, including thinking, attention, language, learning, memory and perception) deficits to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 5), who had severe cognitive impairment due to dementia and no family or surrogate decision-maker, when the facility did not document evidence of interdisciplinary team (IDT) meetings or third-party involvement (like conservator or ombudsman) to advocate for Resident 5's needs before her discharge to an assisted living facility on 2/27/25. This failure had the potential to result in an inappropriate placement, compromising Resident 5's safety and well-being.Findings:Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (memory problem), per the admission Record. Per the same document, under Contacts, Resident 5 had a bioethics IDT (a group of people that discuss moral, social, and legal issues that may arise).A review of Resident 5's medical record was conducted.Per the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt to reschedule a resident's shower schedule or find a suitable time for a shower for one of three sampled residents (Resident 4).This failure resulted in Resident 4 not showering for 11 days, which could lead to discomfort and compromised hygiene.Findings:Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a fracture (broken) of the left ilium (pelvic bone), per the admission Record.On July 7, 2025, at 2:52 P.M., a complainant reported that Resident 4 had not received a shower at the facility for over ten days. Resident 4 preferred morning showersA review of the Activity of Daily Living (ADL- a set of self-care tasks) Report dated 6/23/25 through 7/7/25, under bathing, Resident 4 indicated that the staff had not assisted Resident 4 with showering from 6/23/25 until 7/4/25. Resident 4 did not receive a shower for 11 days.Per the Shower Schedule, Resident 4's scheduled shower was during the PM shift (a work period that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0660 — pattern
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process to identify and address goals for three of three sampled residents (Resident 4, Resident 5, and Resident 6). This failure resulted in rushed discharges without adequate coordination of post-discharge care, placing residents at risk for rehospitalization and inadequate support. (Cross-reference: F-656, Comprehensive Care Plans) Findings: 1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure (heart muscle cannot pump enough blood to the body), Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type (mental illness), per the admission Record. On 4/24/25, a review of Resident 4's medical record was conducted. Resident 4 was discharged from the facility on 4/4/25. There was no evidence that a Discharge Care Plan was developed. Per the Progress Notes, the following event happened: On 4/1/25 at 1:59 P.M., the Social Service Director (SSD) documented that Resident 4 would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan for discharge (leaving the facility) was developed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 4). This failure increased the risk for Resident 4 to have an unsafe discharge from the facility back to the community. Findings: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure (the heart muscle can not pump enough blood to the body), per the admission Record. On 4/24/25, a review of Resident 4's medical record was conducted. Resident 4 was discharged from the facility on 4/4/25. There was no evidence that a Discharge Care Plan was developed for Resident 4. On 4/24/25 at 2:35 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Social Service Director (SSD). The SSD stated she and her assistant were responsible for developing a discharge care plan for Resident 4 on admission, which was missed. The SSD further stated that the care plan should have been created to ensure the resident was discharged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 46 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive resident-centered care plans were implemented for one of two sampled residents (1) when Resident 1 had no bowel movements for three days, and the physician's order was not followed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect resident's health and safety. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm (abnormal tissue growth) of ill-defined sites within the digestive (a group of organs that work together to digest and absorb nutrients from the food that was eaten) system, per the admission Record. A review of Resident 1's medical record was conducted. Per the Plan of Care, dated 11/21/24, Resident 1 was At risk for complications with bowel regimen due to risk for constipation due to decreased physical mobility, weakness, used of medications, under Interventions/Tasks, the LN was to Administer medications per physician order. Per the Order Summary Report,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the discharge medication list order from the hospital matched the facility's admission medication list for one of two sampled residents (1) when one tablet of Sennoside (a medication used to treat constipation) was omitted from the order. As a result, Resident 1 did not receive the desired dose of medicine to be effective. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm (abnormal tissue growth) of ill-defined sites within the digestive (a group of organs that work together to digest and absorb nutrients from the food that was eaten) system, per the admission Record. A review of Resident 1's medical record was conducted. Per the Hospital Discharge Order List, dated 11/21/24, the physician ordered for Sennosides 17.2 milligrams. Per the facility's Order Summary, dated 11/21/24, Resident 1 was to receive Sennosides 8.6 milligrams, take one tablet orally at bedtime for constipation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record was complete for one of two sampled residents (1) when the licensed nurse (LN) had incomplete documentation after receiving an order, and the inventory sheet (record of resident's belongings) was not signed. As a result, the facility could not verify a physician's order and Resident 1's inventory sheet when discharged was not completed. Findings Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm (abnormal tissue growth) of ill-defined sites within the digestive (a group of organs that work together to digest and absorb nutrients from the food that was eaten) system, per the admission Record. A review of Resident 1's medical record was conducted. Per the Progress Notes, dated; 11/28/24, LN 1 documented that Resident 1 insisted on going home because the Butalbital/Acetaminophen/Caffeine (a combination of medications to treat tension headaches) was not routine. LN 1 further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to offer written and follow-up initiation of the advance directives for seven of 20 sampled residents (Residents 10, 29, 77, 36, 237, 61 and 62). This failure resulted in staff not knowing residents' directives regarding care and the residents' legal health care agent. Findings: 1. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia (a severe mental disorder that may interfere with a resident's ability to think, manage emotions, make decisions, and relate to others) per the admission Record. Per the same document, Resident 10 was responsible for herself and had five emergency contacts. A review of Resident 10's medical record was conducted. Per the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST), dated 7/29/24, under Section D, there was no information about the advance directive. Per the history and physical, dated 8/1/24, Resident 10 can make needs known but can not make medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure opened dressings were labeled with an open date, and expired food was removed from the walk-in refrigerator in the kitchen. These failures placed residents at risk of acquiring foodborne illness. Findings: On 12/9/24 at 7:54 A.M., a joint observation and interview were conducted with the Director of Dietary Services (DDS). Inside the walk-in refrigerator were opened, undated gallons of mayonnaise and Asian artisan dressings, and an opened tub of cottage cheese with a USED BY (the last date recommended for the use while at peak quality) date of 12/3/24. The DDS stated the kitchen staff should have written the date when the food was opened and should have used the food before the used-by date or should have discarded the food item. The DDS further stated it was important to have foods labeled, dated, and discarded to ensure that the food served in the kitchen was safe and palatable for the residents. Per the facility's undated policy and procedure titled Food Receiving and Store, .7. Refrigerated foods…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of 20 residents reviewed had accurate and complete medical records when: 1. Resident 66's treatment record was incomplete, 2. Resident 23's post dialysis note was incomplete and did not indicate reassessment after dialysis site bleeding, 3. Resident' 36 and Resident 63's Diabetic Administration Record was incomplete. This failure did not provide an accurate representation of the care provided to the residents and had the potential for residents to not receive the appropriate care. Findings: 1. Resident 66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD- kidney failure) per the admission Record. A review of Resident 66's medical record was conducted. Per the Order Summary Report, dated 12/1/24, the staff was to monitor Resident 10's dialysis site for bleeding and infection every shift. Per the December 2024 Treatment Administration Record (TAR), the monitoring for the dialysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed when an expired disinfectant (kills or inactivates germs) wipes were removed from the cart, and a resident with a wound infection was not placed on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP-infection control measure to prevent spread of infection) timely. These deficient practices could potentially spread infectious diseases in the facility. Findings: 1. On [DATE] at 9:46 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with the Treatment Nurse (TN). Before the wound care observation, the TN stated she sanitized all her equipment with the wipes and placed the wipes back in the cart. After the wound care treatment, the TN rolled the used table and scissors out of the resident's room to the treatment cart in the hallway. The TN then got the wipes inside the treatment cart and showed that the expiration date was [DATE]. The TN stated she should not use the wipes since they were expired. The TN walked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner for a confidential group. This failure resulted in resident's suffering a lack of dignity when the confidential group voiced anger and frustration over call light incidences with the facility staff. The facility census was 86. Cross reference F851 Findings: On 12/10/24 at 10 A.M., a confidential group meeting was conducted. Three out of seven in attendance indicated complaints regarding the facility call light response time. According to the confidential group, the facility call light response depended on the shift, when staff were busy and there were times, staff took break all at the same time. The confidential group stated there were times they waited an hour for staff to answer call lights any time of the day. According to the confidential group the facility was understaffed and there were times, residents waited for an hour to get medications including pain medications. On 12/10/24, a record review of Resident Council Minutes on call light from September to November…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had an authorized responsible party to sign the informed consent for the use of the psychotropic medication (medications that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) for one of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 10). This failure may result in a conflict that impacts the decision-making process for Resident 10. Findings: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia (a severe mental disorder that may interfere with a resident's ability to think, manage emotions, make decisions, and relate to others) per the admission Record. Per the same document, Resident 10 was responsible for herself and had five emergency contacts. A review of Resident 10's medical record was conducted. Per the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST), dated 7/29/24, under Section D, there was no information about the advance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an advanced beneficiary notice (ABN- waiver of liability) was offered in one of six residents (Resident 39) reviewed for discharge . This failure had the potential for Resident 39 to not have options with regards to Resident 39's discharge placement or location and care. Findings: A review of the facility's admission Record indicated Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included primary hypertension (high blood pressure) and osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage). A record review of the Physician's Order Summary dated 12/2/24 indicated Resident 39 had an order for discharge for 12/3/24 to home with home health and durable medical equipment (DME). An interview on 12/12/24 at 11:02 A.M., with the Business Office Manager (BOM) was conducted. The BOM stated Resident 39 exhausted her Medicare (government insurance) benefits, but we did not offer an ABN when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive resident-centered care plans were developed and implemented for two of 20 sampled residents (Resident 29 and 62) when: 1. Resident 29 was not assisted in repositioning while in bed, and nail care was not performed. 2. Resident 62's pressure ulcer was not care planned. These failures had the potential to affect resident's care needs. Findings: 1. Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (blood flow to the brain was blocked) per the admission Record. A review of Resident 29's medical record was conducted. Per the Care Plan, under Focus [problem], Resident 29 was at risk for skin breakdown related to activity intolerance, impaired mobility, incontinence, and bedbound. In addition, the care plan indicated under Interventions/Tasks, the staff should assist in turning and repositioning Resident 29 as indicated or tolerated. Per the Care Plan, the facility's focus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. A review of the facility's admission Record indicated Resident 286 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included morbid obesity and malignant neoplasm (cancer) of the body of the stomach. An interview on 12/9/24 at 9:35 A.M., with Resident 286 was conducted. Resident 286 stated she arrived Thursday night 12/2/24. Resident 286 stated no one has done the treatment to her jejunostomy tube site (JT- a tube inserted into the small intestine to help with nutrition and hydration) and other LNs administered her medications by mouth instead of through her JT. A review of Resident 286 Minimum data set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool) dated 12/12/24 indicated a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15 which meant Resident 286's cognition was intact. An interview on 12/10/24 2:45 P.M., with LN 31 was conducted. LN 31 stated she had admitted Resident 286 and did not accurately transcribe the physician's order for Resident 286's JT site. A record review of the physician's Order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to arrange an appointment for audiology (measure and evaluate hearing) for one of one residents reviewed for Vision and Hearing (Resident 59). This failure resulted in Resident 59 not having access to hearing aids to maintain his hearing. Findings: Resident 59 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] per the facility admission Record. A review of Resident 59's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool) dated 10/19/24 indicated 12 out of a possible 15 which meant moderately impaired mental cognition. A review of the physician's History and Physical Examination dated 8/12/24 indicated Resident 59 has the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of the physician's order dated 8/9/24 indicated audiology evaluation and treatment. A review of the social services progress notes there was no documentation to indicate Resident 59 was seen by an audiologist (ear specialist). A review of Resident 59's appointments indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice when: 1. Physician's order for oxygen was not followed (Resident 16), 2. There was no order for oxygen (Resident 237). As a result, Resident 16 was provided with more oxygen than what was ordered. In addition this failure had the potential to affect Resident 237's respiratory status. Findings: 1. Resident 16 was admitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) per the admission Record. On 12/9/24 at 3: 15 P.M., an observation was conducted with Resident 16's oxygen (air) level at five liters per minute. A review of Resident 16's physician orders dated 11/3/24 indicated oxygen at four liters per minute via nasal cannula (tube place in resident's nose which provides oxygen) continuous and monitor oxygen saturation, if oxygen saturation (oxygen level in blood) is 92%, start oxygen at four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents reviewed (Resident 9), received Trauma Informed Care (TIC- an intervention and organizational approach that focuses on how trauma may affect an individual's life and his or her response to behavioral health). This failure resulted in the facility's inability to identify possible triggers that could result in re-traumatization (the reactivation of trauma symptoms via thoughts, memories, or feelings related to the past torture experience). Findings: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a mental and behavioral disorder that can develop because of exposure to a traumatic event) and suicidal ideations [thoughts of ending one's own life] according to the facility's admission Record. During observation of Resident 9 on 12/9/24 at 11:53 A.M., Resident 9 was in bed in his room with eyes closed. During observation and interview of Resident 9 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Medication Regimen Review (MRR- a thorough evaluation of the resident's current medications) was completed monthly for one of five sampled residents selected for an unnecessary medication review (Resident 10). As a result, there was a potential for Resident 10 to receive unnecessary medications and medication irregularities to go unattended. Findings: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia (a severe mental disorder that may interfere with a resident's ability to think, manage emotions, make decisions, and relate to others) per the admission Record. Resident 10's medical record and the facility's MRR were reviewed. There was no evidence that the MRR was conducted monthly for Resident 10. On 12/12/24 at 9:49 A.M., a joint interview and record review was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). The ADON stated Resident 10 did not have an MRR in October and November…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five selected sampled residents (Resident 10) reviewed for psychotropic (a drug or substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) had specific behavior monitoring in place for the use of antipsychotic ( a class of drugs that treat symptoms of mental disorder by altering brain function). This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary use of psychotropic medication. Findings: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included paranoid (a pattern of behavior where someone feels distrustful, suspicious, and fearful of others), schizophrenia (a severe mental disorder that may interfere with a resident's ability to think, manage emotions, make decisions, and relate to others) per the admission Record. A review of Resident 10's medical record was conducted. Per the Order Summary Report, dated 10/17/24, Resident 10 was taking Olanzapine 10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0851 — isolated
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain staffing based on payroll data on quarterly schedule to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS-government agency overseeing nursing health facilities) for one of four fiscal quarters (4th quarter of 2024 [07/01/24 to 09/30/24]). This failure in excessively low weekend staffing resulted in not meeting staffing requirements by CMS. Cross Reference F550 Findings: A review of the facility [NAME] Report PBJ (Payroll-based journal) Staffing Data Report for Quarter 4 2024 July 1 to September 30, 2024 indicated the metric (method of measuring) for excessively low weekend staffing was triggered which meant the facility submitted PBJ reports with excessively low weekend staffing. On 12/12/24 at 5: 44 P.M., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the DON, Staffing Coordinator and Human Resource (HR)/Payroll Personnel was conducted. The HR/Payroll stated facility corporate submitted quarterly but it triggered because the facility had one day of low staffing in July 2024. The DON stated we had a lot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan related to refusal of care, for one of two residents (Resident 1) who repeatedly refused to ingest the prescribed medications, reviewed for Quality of Care. The failure had the potential for medical complications and a decline in health status. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain disorder), per the facility ' s admission Record. On 9/17/24, Resident 1 ' s clinical record was reviewed. According to the facility ' s census dated 9/17/24, , Resident 1 was no longer at the facility. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-a clinical assessment tool), dated 6/23/24, listed a cognitive score of 3, indicting cognition was severely impaired. According to the physician orders, dated 1/11/24, Sertraline (used for major depression) 25 milligrams (mg) Give one tablet by mouth one time a day for depression, Carvedilol (used to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective pain management services were provided to residents when two of four residents (1, 2) complained of inadequately controlled pain. This failure resulted in psychological harm when the residents experienced unrelieved pain. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: Type 2 diabetes (a chronic condition of the body's inability to regulate blood sugar levels) with diabetic polyneuropathy (a complication of diabetes affecting nerves in the body, causing sensations of numbness, stabbing pain, burning, tingling or pricking, and can cause insensitivity to temperature changes); other chronic pain. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: other acute (recent) osteomyelitis, (bone infection) right ankle and foot; acute embolism and thrombosis (blood clot blocking vein) of left axillary (upper arm) vein; chronic (over 6 weeks) embolism (a sudden…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:(1) document a change in the resident's condition's or status for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) before starting Lorazepam (a medication that affects mood, emotions, and behaviors), and (2) ensure the licensed nurse (LN) correctly transcribed the physician's order for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). As a result, Resident 1 had the potential to receive unnecessary medication without proper monitoring of the behavior. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements), per the admission Record. A review of Resident 1's medical record was conducted. Per the Order Summary Report, dated 4/16/24, Resident 1 was to receive Lorazepam 1 mg (milligram) two times a day [routinely]. There was no change of condition or documentation in the medical record regarding Resident 1's behavioral symptoms or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set- a comprehensive resident assessment) was accurate for 1 of 2 sampled residents (1) with an indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine out of the body). As a result, Resident 1 did not consistently receive appropriate treatment and service. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included neuromuscular dysfunction (a disease that affects the function of muscles due to problems with the nerves and muscles) of the bladder, per the admission Record. On 1/29/24 at 11:33 A.M., Resident 1 reported that he fell and caused pain to the indwelling catheter. A review of Resident 1's medical record was conducted. Per the Physician's order, dated 1/16/24, Resident 1 had an indwelling catheter change when pulled out. Resident 1's catheter bag was to be placed inside the privacy bag, and the catheter was to be secured with a leg strap at all times. Per the MDS dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not assess one resident, (Resident 1), for PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, a disorder that develops when a person has experienced or witnessed a terrifying or dangerous event. The disorder can cause intense distress at real or symbolic reminders of the trauma) when, Resident 1 was admitted with a known diagnosis of PTSD. This failure had the potential to expose Resident 1 to trauma triggers while in the care of the Facility. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included PTSD, MDD (Major Depressive Disorder, a mental health condition that causes a persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities that once brought joy), and anxiety (an emotion characterized by feelings of tension, worried thoughts, and physical changes like increased blood pressure). On 11/14/23 at 1:00 P.M., an observation and interview were conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation,interview and record review, the facility did not provide for the Resident's (2) Rights related to transportation services. This failure caused the Resident to miss a medical appointment. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] diagnoses that included myelodyspastic syndrome (MDS-pre-leukemia) according to the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 2's medical record was conducted on 10/23/23 at 9:50 A.M. A physician's order, dated, 8/1/23, indicated, .oncology f/u for MDS with . on Monday at GH Cancer Center . An interview was conducted on 10/23/23 at 9:55 with the director of nursing (DON). The DON stated, Appointments and transport are co-ordinated by our Scheduler. He is new to the role. There was some confusion about the appointment and transport; it was canceled and re-scheduled. The Resident was upset. An interview was conducted on 10/23/23 at 10 A.M. with the scheduler. The scheduler stated, There was a complication with Resident 2's transport to her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for two Residents (1) and (2). This failure had the potential for Residents 1 and 2 to not receive needed care. Findings: a. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes (inability to control blood sugar), anemia (low iron), and venous embolism (blood clot in an artery) according to the facility's admission Record. An interview was conducted on 10/23/23 at 9:18 A.M. with the director of nursing (DON). The DON stated, Resident 1 takes anti-coagulants (blood thinners) which can cause bruising. On 10/23/23 at 10 A.M. a concurrent observation and interview of Resident 1 was conducted. Resident 1 was sitting on the side of his bed. His right arm was observed to have a bruise near the elbow, blue-green in color. Resident 1 stated: I don't know how I got it. It is not painful. A review of Resident 1's medical record was conducted on 10/23/23 at 9:25 A.M. No nursing care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-01 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan (detailed plan with information about a patient's treatment, goal, and interventions) of a resident's aggressive behavior (Resident 2) for one of two sampled residents. As a result, the facility staff were not aware of what to expect during Resident 2's episodes of aggressive behavior. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Huntington's disease (genetic disease that attacks the brain, causing unsteady and uncontrollable movements, cognition [perception, awareness, thinking, judgement] and mental health), per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 2's H & P dated 6/6/23, indicated Resident 2 could make needs known but could not make medical decisions. A physician's progress notes dated 6/6/23 indicated Resident 2 had increased agitation, his behaviors were not controlled in the facility and was sent to general acute care hospital. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-07-15 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff competently carried out the functions of the food and nutrition services department when: 1. A [NAME] (CK 1) did not monitor the dry storage room by correctly checking the quality of the food supply and the temperature, and 2. CK 1 did not prepare the tuna salad correctly using the cool down process for ambient temperature foods. These failures had the potential for food contamination, resulting in food borne illnesses for all residents who consume food from the kitchen. The census was 66. Cross reference 812 and 925 Findings: 1. On 7/12/21, at 9:02 A.M., an observation of the kitchen's dry storage was conducted. A fly was observed flying in the dry storage room. There was an opened box of bananas, a small container of uncovered red onions, and two opened boxes of potatoes. Next to the box of potatoes was a large and shallow, clear plastic bin, measuring 17 inches by 25.5 inches and 6 inches in depth. The bin contained roughly 70 to 80 white onions, with the lid loosely sitting on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner, according to the facility policy and standards of practice within the Food and Nutrition Services department when: 1. The dry storage room was: a) not pest-free, b) contained a large bin of white onions some with black mold spots, c) at a temperature of 82 degrees Fahrenheit (F); 2. The tuna salad and egg salad was not prepared in a food safe manner when the kitchen staff did not use the cool down process for ambient temperature foods; 3. The dishes were stored wet. These failures had the potential to put the residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Cross reference, F802 and F925. Findings: 1a, b. On 7/12/21, at 9:02 A.M., during the initial kitchen tour, an observation of the kitchen's dry storage was conducted. A fly was observed flying in the dry storage room. There was an opened box of bananas, a small container of uncovered red onions and two boxes of potatoes. Next to the box of potatoes was a large and shallow, clear plastic bin, measuring 17…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-07-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of pests. This failure had the potential for the cross-contamination of foods stored in the kitchen, foods being prepared during tray line, and during meal times, resulting in food-borne illnesses. Findings: On 7/12/21, at 9:02 A.M., an observation of the kitchen's walk-in dry storage was conducted. A fly was observed flying in the midst of the walk-in dry storage. There was an opened box of bananas, a small container of uncovered red onions, and two opened boxes of potatoes. Next to the box of potatoes was a large and shallow, clear plastic bin, measuring 17 inches by 25.5 inches and 6 inches in depth. The bin contained roughly, 70 to 80 white onions, with its lid loosely sitting over the white onions. Many small black fruit flies flew out of the bin of white onions. On 7/12/21, at 9:18 A.M., an observation of the bin of white onions in the walk-in dry storage, and an interview with the RD was conducted. There were many fruit flies hovering among the white onions. The RD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of four residents reviewed for Activities of daily living (ADL, which includes good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene) had adequate personal hygiene care (Residents 11, 15, 48, 58). This failure had the potential to cause infection, and impact quality of life and self-esteem. Findings: 1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the brain, affecting movement), per the Resident Face Sheet. On 7/12/21 at 3:44 P.M., an observation of Resident 11 was conducted at her bedside. Resident 11 was in bed, lying on her back. Her hands were contracted (joints stiffen and become rigid), and soft rolls were inserted into the center of each hand to stretch out the contractures. The finger nails on both hands were long and touching the palms of her hands. On 7/15/21, a record review was conducted. Shower sheets from 6/23/21 to 7/14/21 were reviewed. Three of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform reference checks for one of one CNAs (CNA 11) reviewed for a complaint. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for abuse or neglect. Findings: On 7/14/21, a record review was conducted. CNA 11's employee file was reviewed for required documentation for new hires. CNA 11s reference checks were not documented. On 7/14/21 at 10:12 A.M., a concurrent interview and review of CNA 11's employee file was conducted with the DSD. The DSD stated she was the CNA supervisor, and responsible for completing the reference checks for all CNA applicants. The DSD acknowledged CNA 11's reference checks were not performed prior to employment. The DSD stated that it was important to complete the reference checks to ensure the facility responsibly hired qualified individuals of good character. The facility policy and procedure dated, 6/1/201, titled Background Screening, indicated, .3. Reference checks will be performed an all applicants, in accordance with state requirements .5. Background checks do not take the place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders when: 1. Restorative Nursing Assistant services (RNA, exercises and stretching to help maintain function of the muscles of the limbs) were not provided for four of four residents reviewed for limited range of motion (Residents 11, 15, 48, 58). 2. Medication administration was completed via a gastrointestinal tube (GT, a tube inserted into the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach, Resident 38), and 3. A controlled drug was administered to Resident 47. As a result, the residents were at risk for: 1. Muscle weakness and an inability to function independently. 2. Occlusion (blockage) of the GT which could lead to an unnecessary and invasive procedure of replacing GT. 3. Overmedication of controlled drugs, which could have resulted in respiratory failure (inability to breath). Findings: 1.a. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a deep tissue injury (DTI, damage of the underlying soft tissue from intense and/or prolonged pressure) from developing for two of three residents reviewed for wounds (Residents 66, 56). As a result, the residents had the potential for increased pain and prolonged wound healing. Findings: 1. Resident 66 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included thrombosis (increased risk of blood clots), and diabetes (elevated blood sugar) per the Resident Face Sheet. On 7/15/21 at 11:28 A.M., an observation and interview of Resident 66 was conducted prior to wound treatment with LN 14. Resident 66 was observed in bed, lying on his right side. His left heel was in a large soft boot heel protector, elevated on a pillow. Resident 66 stated he was having pain on a scale of 8/10 (severe pain) on his left foot and would like his pain medication. On 7/15/21 at 12:48 P.M., an interview was conducted with LN 17. LN 17 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an assessment after dialysis (a treatment to remove waste from the body) for one of one residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident 12). As a result, there was the potential for undetected, potentially life-threatening complications after dialysis. Findings: Resident 12 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dependence on renal dialysis, per the Resident Face Sheet. On 7/12/21 at 10:41 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 12. Resident 12 stated he goes to dialysis three times a week. Resident 12 stated when he returned each evening, he removed the dressing from his dialysis site himself. Resident 12 stated he had never seen staff assess his dialysis site upon his return. On 7/15/21, a record review was conducted. Per a physician's order report, dated 4/5/21, Resident 12s dialysis site was to be assessed upon return from dialysis. Per the Facility-Dialysis communication Report, dated 7/6/21 and 7/13/21,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy for two of three residents (Residents 41 & 47) reviewed for controlled drugs (drugs at high risk for abuse). As a result, the facility was at risk for controlled drug loss and theft. Findings: 1. On 7/14/21, a record review was conducted on Resident 41's medical record. The Controlled Drug Record (CDR) and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) were compared: 1a. The CDR indicated two tablets (10 mg per tablet) of as needed (PRN) Oxycodone (a strong pain medication) was removed for Resident 41 on 7/8/21 at 6:41 P.M. There is no documented evidence in Resident 41's MAR indicating the resident received two tablets (10 mg per tablet) of PRN Oxycodone on 7/8/21 at 6:41 P.M. b. The CDR indicated two tablets (10 mg per tablet) of as needed (PRN) Oxycodone was removed for Resident 41 on 7/9/21 at 7:30 P.M. There is no documented evidence in Resident 41's MAR indicating the resident received two tablets (10 mg per tablet) of PRN Oxycodone on 7/9/21 at 7:30 P.M. c. The CDR indicated two tablets (10 mg per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to monitor the temperatures of their medication refrigerator per the facility's policy. This failure had the potential to affect the integrity of the refrigerated medications administered to the facility's residents, putting their health at risk. On 7/14/21 at 12:02 P.M., an observation, interview, and concurrent document review were conducted with the facility's DSD. The facility's document titled Med Room Refrigerator Temp Log dated June 2021, indicated, no staff signatures or temperature readings were documented on 7/1/21 for A.M and P.M., 7/7/21 for A.M. and P.M., and 7/12/21 for P.M. The facility's DSD stated the medication refrigerator temperatures should be checked and documented per the facility's policy. The DSD acknowledged that there was no documented temperatures or staff signatures on the log, per the policy. DSD stated if the refrigerator temperatures are not kept in the proper temperature range it could cause the integrity of the refrigerated medications to be compromised. Per a facility policy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (32 and 36) received food that accommodated their food preferences. This failure had the potential to result in decreased food intake and weight loss. Findings: 1. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. Resident 32's MDS (Minimum Data Set; an assessment tool), dated 5/21/21, indicated the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status; an assessment tool) score of 14 (13 - 15 indicated a cognitively intact status). On 7/13/21, at 12:11 P.M., an observation and interview with Resident 32 was conducted. Resident 32 was eating his lunch in his room. Resident 32 stated his dislikes included gravy. On his meal tray was a serving of pork chops, and a bowl of gravy. A review of Resident 32's tray card for 7/13/21, indicated, Dislikes: .No Gravy . 2. Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. Resident 36's MDS, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safe and sanitary handling of residents' foods brought in from the outside, as per the facility's policy, and the standards of practice. This failure had the potential to expose the residents to food contamination. Findings: On 7/12/21 at 3:43 P.M., an interview with CNA 16 was conducted. CNA 16 stated, resident food brought from outside must have a label with the resident's name and the date. CNA 16 stated food could only be kept in the facility for one day, 24 hours, but was not sure how long the food could be stored in the Nourishment Room refrigerator. On 7/15/21, at 10:02 A.M., an interview with the RD was conducted. The RD stated foods brought from outside can be stored in the Nourishment Room refrigerator for three days, from the received date, and must be checked by the nurses to ensure the food is okay and consistent with the resident's diet. The RD further stated, perishable foods can be kept for 72 hours from the received date. On 7/15/21, at 11:25 A.M., an interview with CNA 17 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident medications were available for administration for two of 18 sampled residents (58, 238). As a result, there was the potential for ineffective pain management for the residents. 2. Resident medications were administered as ordered through a J-tube (jejunostomy tube is a soft, plastic tube placed through the skin of the abdomen into the midsection of the small intestine) for one resident sampled for J-tube medication administration (9). As a result, there was the potential to negatively impact the resident's ability to maintain the highest level of practicable well-being. 3. The pharmacy reviewed medications for irregularities for a new resident (78). As a result, there was potential for the resident to experience harmful, medication-related side effects. Findings: 1a. Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include polyarthritis (pain, swelling, and stiffness in multiple joints) and opioid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff followed infection control policy and accepted standards when staff members did not perform hand hygiene between seven unsampled residents (15, 35, 77, 109,188, 190, and 241) or sanitize resident equipment. As a result, there was the potential for the spread of infection. Findings: a. On 7/10/19 at 8:24 A.M., a medication administration observation for Residents 15, 35, 188 and 190 was conducted with LN 2. LN 2 placed the medication administration tray on resident bedside tables and on the seat of a walker as he administered medications to the residents. LN 2 did not perform hand hygiene between residents, or sanitize the medication tray used to deliver medication to the residents. On 7/10/19 at 9:50 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 2. LN 2 stated he had last been educated on infection control about a month ago. LN 2 stated he should have washed or sanitized his hands, and sanitized the medication administration tray before and after each resident medication administration to prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Room temperatures were comfortable and safe for four of 18 residents (35, 81, 238, 239) sampled for environment. This failure caused Residents 35, 81, 238 and 239 to feel cold and uncomfortable, and had the potential to cause hypothermia. 2. The wall and ceiling in the laundry room were in good repair. This failure had the potential to contaminate the clean laundry, and to affect all residents in the facility. Findings: 1. On 7/8/19, at 8:03 A.M., during a tour of Station 1, cool air was felt in the hallway blowing out from room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door. On 7/8/19 at 8:05 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted. Resident 35 was lying in bed with a blanket which covered her from her feet to her neck. Resident 35 stated the room had been uncomfortable and cold and really cold air had blown out of the vent all morning. On 7/8/19 at 8:07 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted. Resident 238 was lying in bed with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were resident-centered for 3 of 3 residents (3, 24, 74 ) sampled for care plans. 1. Resident 74's care plan did not include person-centered, non-pharmacological (non-medication) interventions when anxiety was displayed, which had the potential to result in the administration of unnecessary psychotropic medications and reduce the resident's quality of life. 2. Resident 3 and 24's care plans did not include their preferences for activities, which had the potential to affect their quality of life. Findings: 1. Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included unspecified anxiety disorder (a mental disorder that causes someone to worry and feel fearful), and bipolar schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder that causes feelings of overexcitement and irritability), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 7/8/19 at 10:19 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 74.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to evaluate resident's activity preferences and offer meaningful, person-centered activities that met the interest and needs for 2 of 3 residents (3, 24) sampled for activities. This failure had the potential to cause boredom, depression and decreased quality of life. Findings: a. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia and unspecified anxiety disorder, per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. Resident 3's MDS (an assessment tool), dated 6/16/19, indicated Resident 3 had a BIMS (a screening tool to assess mental cognition) score of 10 (a BIMS of 8-12 indicated a person was moderately mentally impaired). On 7/8/19 at 9:44 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted. Resident 3 was lying in bed. Family member 1 (FM) was at the bedside and stated Resident 3 was always in bed when they visited. On 7/8/19 at 11:15 A.M., an observation was conducted.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence of documentation of non-pharmacological behavior interventions, prior to the administration of a psychotropic medication (a medication that affects mental processes and behavior), for 1 unsampled resident (74). This failure had the potential to result in the administration of unnecessary psychotropic medications and reduce Resident 74's quality of life. Findings: Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included unspecified anxiety disorder (a mental disorder that causes someone to worry and feel fearful), and bipolar schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder that causes feelings of over excitement and irritability), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 7/8/19 at 10:19 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 74. Resident 74 was observed in bed. Resident 74 stated she had hollered out but did not know why. Resident 74 stated she was on hospice and she had become afraid, crying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the prescribing physician documented an evaluation and rationale for a psychotropic medication (a medication that affects mental processes and behavior) for 1 unsampled resident (74). This failure had the potential to result in the administration of unnecessary psychotropic medications and reduce Resident 74's quality of life. Findings: Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis which included unspecified anxiety disorder (a mental disorder that causes someone to worry and feel fearful), and bipolar schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder that causes feelings of over excitement and irritability), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 7/8/19 at 10:19 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 74. Resident 74 was in bed. Resident 74 stated she had hollered out but did not know why she had done it. Resident 74 stated she was on hospice and sometimes she had become afraid. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-11 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a hospice agency's documentation of services and prospective visit calendar was present in the clinical record for two of two hospice residents (46, 58). As a result, there was the potential to put the residents at risk for delayed or uncoordinated care between the facility healthcare team and the hospice agency. Findings: 1. Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart failure (severe failure of the heart to function properly and adult failure to thrive (weight loss of more than 5%, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and physical inactivity) per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. Resident 46 was placed on hospice (comfort) care on 4/29/19 per the Hospice Nurse Practitioner Or Non-Certifying Physician Face to Face form. A review of Resident 46's hospice medical record indicated the last documentation of services by hospice staff was dated 5/10/19 On 7/10/19 at 2:10 P.M., a telephone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$9,110 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $9,110 — penalty dated 2026-02-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MOFIDI, MANSOURIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/01/2022
MOORE, HUNTERIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2022
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 4%Medicare 19%Other / private 77%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$420per resident / day
operating cost
$12,774per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$457per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055064. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next