Escondido Post Acute
421 E Mission Ave, Escondido, CA 92025 · For profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (760) 747-0430 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.7% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.4% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.3% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.6% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.6% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.3% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.11 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.07 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 159 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 80.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.5%CMS range 47.4–61.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 8.0–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 80.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 69.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 54.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 90.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.2%CMS range 6.0–15.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 173.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.447 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not develop patient centered care plans for two of four residents reviewed for care plans (Resident 1 and Resident 3) when: 1. A care plan was not developed to address Resident 1's behavior at the facility's garden area, 2. A care plan was not developed to address Resident 1's discharge plan and intent to leave the facility against medical advice (AMA), 3. A care plan was not developed for Resident 3's placement preference. This failure had the potential for residents not to receive care based on their needs.FINDINGS: On 4/1/26 at 1:16 P.M., an unannounced onsite visit at the facility was conducted related to a reported resident elopement. 1.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis (bone infection) of the left ankle and foot according to the facility's admission Record. During an interview on 4/1/26 at 1:18 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated on 3/27/26, she was notified that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to submit a five-day (5-day) summary of investigation to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH- state agency that protect the public's health and enforces state and federal laws) related to an abuse allegation for one of two residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident 6) This failure had the potential to result in a delay in determining the occurrence of abuse and had the potential to affect Resident 6's safety and well-being.Findings: On 12/30/24 at 8:53 A.M., an unannounced onsite visit at the facility was conducted related to a reported abuse allegation. Resident 6 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including other sequelae (consequence of a previous disease or injury) of other cerebrovascular disease (a condition affecting blood flow and blood vessels in the brain) according to the facility's admission Record. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 6 on 10/30/25 at 10:29 A.M. Resident 6 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy and dignity by covering a urinary catheter bag (a flexible tube that drains urine into a collection bag) for one of three resident's (Resident 1), when reviewed for Resident Rights. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to be embarrassed and exposed with a urinary catheter collection bag. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility 2/14/25, with diagnosis which included displaced fracture of left hip and diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar levels in the blood), per the facility's admission Record. The physician's order was reviewed on 6/11/25 at 11:13 A.M., dated 6/11/25, .External condom catheter (a device that collects urine from the bladder and directs it into a collection bag) due to a diagnosis urinary retention (the inability to completely empty the bladder of urine) . An observation and interview was conducted with certified nursing assistant 1 (CNA 1) of Resident 1 on 6/11/25 at 12:08 P.M., as he laid in bed. On the lower right side of the bed frame was a urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician when parameters for blood sugar levels were out of range, for one of three residents (Resident 1), when reviewed for Quality of Care. This failure resulted in the physician being uninformed when additional insulin (a hormone which regulates blood sugar levels in the blood) could have been ordered to reduce the risk of hyperglycemia (high blood sugar levels which can lead to health problems that affect the eyes, kidneys, nerves and heart). Findings: Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility 2/14/25, with diagnosis which included displaced fracture of left hip and diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar levels in the blood), per the facility's admission Record. Resident 1's record was reviewed on 6/11/25. Resident 1's nurses note, dated 6/6/25 at 8:48 P.M., Resident 1 was noted with confusion, doctor notified and new order to send to emergency room for evaluation. According to Resident 1's nurses note dated 6/9/25 at 11:15 P.M., resident returned from hospital with diagnoses of hyperglycemia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended for one resident (Res 1). This failure had the potential to affect Resident 1 ' s safety and staff drug diversion. Findings. A record review of the facility ' s undated admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Atrial Fibrillation (irregular rapid heart rate) and Urinary Tract Infection (bladder infection). An observation during a facility reported investigation on 5/12/24 at 10:00 A.M., in Resident 1 ' s room was conducted. Resident 1 had multiple number of medications, inside a small clear cup sitting on Resident 1's bedside table. Resident 1 stated, I think the nurse left the medications there for me to take, but I was still asleep. Resident 1 stated she did not know what the medications were and what they were for. A review of Resident 1 ' s minimum data set( MDS- federally mandated assessment tool) dated 2/3/25 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess a resident's ability to self-administer their medication for 1 (Resident #153) of 33 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, with a copyright date of 2001, indicated, Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #153 on 02/12/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis (a breakdown of muscle tissue). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/19/2025, revealed Resident #153 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #153's comprehensive Care Plan Report with an admission date of 02/12/2025, revealed no care plan to indicate the resident could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure beneficiary notifications were completed accurately for 2 (Resident #128 and Resident #143) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medicare Advance Beneficiary and Medicare Non-Coverage Notices, revised 09/2024, indicated, 4. Written notices are provided in person to the beneficiary when possible. A copy of the notice is provided to the beneficiary (or authorized representative) immediately after the notice is signed. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #128 on 12/03/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy. A skilled nursing facility (SNF) Part A Prospective Payment System (PPS) [NAME] Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/26/2025, revealed Resident #128 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report timely, an allegation of verbal abuse to the state survey agency for 1 (Resident #23) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for abuse. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program with a copyright date of 2001, indicated Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. The policy specified, 9. Investigate and report any allegations within timeframes required by federal requirements. An admission Record specified the facility admitted Resident #23 on 06/12/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and hypertension. A quarterly Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff submitted a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) to the state agency for review after a significant change in status occurred for 1 (Resident # 53) of 5 residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings included: A facility policy titled, PASRR (Pre-admission Screening & [and] Resident Review), dated 06/2018, indicated, 3. A negative Level I screen permits admission to proceed and ends the pre-screening process unless possible serious mental disorder or intellectual disability arises later. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #53 on 04/03/2016. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of unspecified cerebral infarction (stroke), unspecified schizophrenia (with an onset date of 05/08/2018), and other specified depressive episodes (with an onset date of 05/08/2018). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/02/2025, revealed Resident #53 had a Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide necessary treatments and services consistent with professional standards of practice during wound care for 1 (Resident #150) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Wound Care, revised 10/2010, revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. The policy revealed the section titled, Preparation, included, 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure and 3. Assemble the equipment and supplies as needed. A facility policy titled, Physician Orders, revised 06/2013, revealed, Physician orders must be given, managed and carried out in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Resident #150's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 01/17/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus, cellulitis of the right lower limb, fracture of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices during wound care for 1 (Resident #150) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, and failed to ensure proper storage of oxygen and nebulizer equipment, when not in use, to prevent the spread of infection for 1 (Resident #278) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, Wound Care, revised 10/2010, revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. The policy revealed the section titled, Steps in the Procedure, included, 1. Use disposable cloth (paper towel is adequate) to establish clean field on resident's overbed table. Place all items to be used during procedure on the clean field. Arrange the supplies so they can be easily reached. 2. Wash and dry your hands thoroughly. Further review revealed, 4. Put on exam glove. Loosen tape and remove dressing. 5. Pull glove…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1). Correctly re- position the resident with the correct orthopedic devices as ordered by the physician. 2). Provide continued care with Restorative Nursing services 3). Failed to notify the physician that physical therapy services and restorative services were not provided. 4). Failed to notify the physician the brace was not being used as ordered, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident 1) for mobility. As a result of these failures, Resident 1 was at risk for a decrease in range of motion, and experienced psychosocial distress and fear of not achieving independence with Activities of Daily Living (ADL ' s) such as dressing, grooming, and being up in her wheelchair for periods of time. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included multiple contractures (shortening of muscles, tendons, and skin that cause joint stiffness and limited movement. A BIMS (routine screening of memory and thinking) score of 14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify residents and their representatives of the facility bed hold policy for four of four residents reviewed for notifications regarding bed holds before or as soon as possible after transfer to hospital. This failure had the potential for psychological harm related to uncertainty if the resident could return when their condition improved. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with health conditions including osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) of right tibia and fibula (lower leg bones); diabetes type 2 (a chronic disease of the body not producing insulin, causing high blood sugars), according to her admission Record. Resident 2 was transferred from the facility to an Acute Care Hospital (ACH) due to a new cough with difficulty breathing and a new need for oxygen on 11/1/24 at 4:50 P.M., according to the SBAR communication form dated 11/1/24. On 11/13/24 at 2:26 P.M. family of Resident 2 stated Resident 2's room was not held…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to treat one of seven sampled residents with dignity and respect. This failure had the potential for Resident 6 to feel ashamed and embarassed. Findings: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 6's health conditions included: dementia; malignant neoplasm (spreading cancer) of the stomach according to her admission Record. On 11/22/24 at 10:56 A.M. an observation and interview were held with Resident 6 in her room. Resident 6, a small lady, was seen sitting up in bed, propped up with pillows, leaning to the left. Resident 6's breakfast tray was still in front of her. Oatmeal was seen on her lower face, and dripping from her chin onto her bedding. Resident 6 was wearing a hospital gown, unsnapped at the right collar. Her right collar bone, upper ribs and breastbone were visible. A bath blanket was sideways over her, exposing her lower legs and her right thigh. On 11/22/24 at 11:02 A.M. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LN) 1 responded to Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to exercise care in protecting 1 residents' (Resident 2) property from loss and physical damage out of 11 property loss reports reviewed. As a result, the resident's painting was reported lost. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with health conditions including osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) right tibia and fibula (lower leg bones); diabetes type 2 (a chronic disease of the body not producing insulin, causing high blood sugars). Resident 2 was transferred from the facility to an Acute Care Hospital (ACH) due to a new cough, with difficulty breathing and a need for oxygen on 11/1/24 at 4:50 P.M., according to the SBAR communication form dated 11/1/24. On 11/25/24 at 4:30 P.M. the Director of Social Services (DSS) was interviewed in her office, and Resident 2's chart was reviewed, along with the past seven months of missing property reports. The DSS stated there had been 11 missing property reports filed, with 1 report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not implement interventions to prevent a fall for one of three residents (Resident 1) reviewed for a fall. This failure increased the risk of injury related to falls for Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: epilepsy (a brain condition of abnormal electric impulses that cause seizures, which can be staring, jerky movements, body stiffness, loss of consciousness); unsteady on feet; A BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) test, completed on 7/22/24 noted Resident 1 with a score of 6, severely impaired. On 8/28/24 at 3:40 P.M. A family member was interviewed. The family member (FM) reports Resident 1 had a fall a few days ago, in addition to a fall outside the facility that happened mid-July, when Resident 1 was sent to the hospital. FM 1 stated Resident 1 hurt…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not implement interventions to prevent a fall for one of three residents (Resident 1) reviewed for a fall. This failure increased the risk of injury related to falls for Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: epilepsy (a brain condition of abnormal electric impulses that cause seizures, which can be staring, jerky movements, body stiffness, loss of consciousness); unsteady on feet; A BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) test, completed on [DATE] noted Resident 1 with a score of 6, severely impaired. On [DATE] at 3:40 P.M. A family member was interviewed. The family member (FM) reports Resident 1 had a fall a few days ago, in addition to a fall outside the facility that happened mid-July, when Resident 1 was sent to the hospital. FM 1 stated Resident 1 hurt…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop person-centered care plans for one of five residents (Resident 1), related to: a. The potential for falls; b. Pain; c. Urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in the urine); d. Anticoagulant (blood thinning medication) therapy; and e. The potential for skin injuries. As a result, there was the potential Resident 1's care was not being provided consistently and potential problem areas were not identified. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included fall, resulting in a fracture to the right hip and right wrist, requiring surgical aftercare, per the facility admission Record. On 7/18/24, Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed: a. (Falls) According to the facility's Fall Risk Assessment, dated 7/2/24, Resident 1 had a fall assessment score of 22, scores 16-42 indicate High Risk for falls. According to the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS-a clinical assessment tool), dated 7/8/24, Resident 1 had one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform and document skin assessments prior to a discharge for one of five residents (Resident 1), reviewed for services meeting professional standards of practice. As a result, Resident 1 was discharged , and family were unaware of the bruises and skin injuries caused while at the facility. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included fall, resulting in a fracture to the right hip and right wrist, requiring surgical aftercare, per the facility admission Record. On 7/18/24, an unannounced visit was made to the facility in response to a complaint. The complainant provided two photographs of Resident 1's lower abdomen (lower stomach) area, showing numerous areas of black/blue/green/yellow bruising. On 7/18/24, Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed: According to the physician's order, dated 7/2/24, .Braden scale (a standardized tool used by healthcare providers to determine a resident's risk for developing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to routinely check and record resident room temperatures, resident bathroom water temperatures, call lights, and resident equipment. This failure had the potential for residents to be uncomfortable or at risk for accidents related to unidentified hazards. Findings: On 8/4/23 an unannounced visit was made to the facility due to a complaint of hot, uncomfortable resident room temperatures within the facility. The hallway temperature thermometers read 72 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Standing electrical fans were in the hallway of Station 3 and a portable air conditioning unit was in the north hallway of Station 3. On 8/4/23 at 2:02 P.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 4 outside of her room. Resident 4 stated her room was too cold and she had to sleep with several blankets at night. Resident 2 asked if the temperature in her room could be adjusted. On 8/4/23 at 2:15 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Interim Maintenance Director (I-MD). The I-MD stated the previous MD left on 7/6/23, and he took over the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a person-centered comprehensive care plan was developed and or implemented in regard to four sampled residents (141, 59, 81,103). These failures had the potential for an increased risk of oral infection and to negatively impact the residents' (141, 59, 81, 103) quality of life, as well as the quality of care and services received. Findings: 1. Resident 141 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (problem in the brain caused by chemical imbalance in the blood), per the facility's Face Sheet. A review of Resident 141's MDS (minimum data set - an assessment tool), dated 12/16/21, was conducted. Resident 141's functional status indicated extensive assistance in all areas of his activities of daily living. On 1/31/22 at 11:14 A.M., an observation of Resident 141 was conducted in his room. Resident 141 lay on his bed with his eyes closed and mouth open. Resident 141's lips were noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for the provision of pharmaceutical services when: 1. Licensed staff failed to administer prescribed medications to Resident 39 and Resident 34. 2. Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) 5 mg (milligram - unit of measure) tablets dated as 7/26/21 were found in the disposition locker and licensed staff were unable to determine when the medication was stored for disposition leading to inaccurate reconciliation. 3. Oxycodone 100mg(milligram)/5ml (milliliter unit of liquid measure) for Resident 1 was not accurately reconciled on the controlled drug count sheet. These failures had a potential of not effectively treating residents due to delayed or missed medications and controlled substance discrepancies leading to diversion. Findings: 1. On 1/31/22 at 9:14 A.M., at Station 3, RN 1 was observed preparing medications for administration for Resident 39. It was observed that Nevibolol (a medication for blood pressure) 10 mg and ciprofloxacin (medication to treat bacterial infections)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their infection control program for COVID-19 Mitigation Plan/Policies and Procedures dated 9/9/21. In addition, the facility failed to implement general infection control practices, which included: 1. The staff and visitors who entered the facility did not wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) which included wearing, N95 masks, gowns, gloves, and eye protection. Transmission Based Precaution's (TBP) were not followed for the entire facility (which was declared a yellow isolation zone) 2. The visitors who entered the facility did not undergo the COVID-19 screening process. 3. The licensed staff did not sanitize (to clean and make free of disease-causing elements) equipment during medication administration according to manufacturer specification. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the spread of infection placing residents, staff, and visitors at risk for infections, including COVID-19 (a highly contagious…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect and treat the residents with respect and dignity for one sampled resident. (58). This failure had the potential to affect the resident's psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (part of the brain loses blood supply), per the facility's Face Sheet. A review of the MDS (minimum data set - an assessment tool) was conducted, dated 11/15/21, which indicated Resident 58 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 5, which indicated Resident 58 had severe impaired cognition. On 1/31/22 at 9:40 A.M., an observation with Resident 58 was conducted in his room. Resident 58 lay on his bed with no privacy curtains pulled and faced the window with his back side to the door. The door to Resident 58's room was fully opened to the hall where visitors, and staff walked by the room. Resident 58's back, legs and his brief (underwear for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-03 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman when one sampled resident (Resident 21) was transferred to the hospital. As a result, Resident 21 was not fully protected from an inappropriate discharge when the facility did not communicate Resident 21's transfer with an advocate from the Ombudsman office. Findings: Record review was conducted on 1/31/22 at 3:26 P.M. of Resident 21's current Facesheet. This document indicated Resident 21 was re-admitted to the skilled nursing facility on [DATE] with the added diagnosis of pneumonia. On 1/31/22 at 3:26 P.M., a review of Resident 21's Progress Notes was performed. The Progress Notes indicated Resident 21 was transferred to the hospital in October 2021. There was no documentation in the medical record of the notification to the Ombudsman's office regarding this transfer. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/2/22 at 3 P.M., the DON stated there was no fax or documentation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility consultant pharmacist (CP) failed to identify irregularities in psychotropic (a medication that affects a person's mental state) medication use for Resident 103 when: 1. Seroquel (antipsychotic medication to treat mental health issues) administered without adequate monitoring of A1c (lab value for average blood sugar in past 3 months), 2. Seroquel administered without adequate indication for use affective (mood) psychosis (a condition that affects the way your brain processes information), 3. Paxil administered without GDR (gradual dose reduction). These failures caused the resident to potentially not receive the necessary care for their needs and increased the potential for adverse reactions and death. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 103's clinical record indicated that she was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 103's clinical record indicated that she had been taking Seroquel (antipsychotic medication to treat mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 103 was free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications when: 1. Seroquel (antipsychotic medication to treat mental health issues) administered without adequate monitoring of A1c (lab value for average blood sugar in past 3 months), 2. Seroquel administered without adequate indication for use affective (mood) psychosis (a condition that affects the way your brain processes information), 3. Seroquel, trazodone (medication for mood), Paxil (a medication to treat depression) administered without behavioral interventions (non-pharmacological methods to manage behavior issues), 4. Paxil administered without GDR (gradual dose reduction) These failures caused the resident to potentially not receive the necessary care for their needs and increased the potential for adverse reactions and death. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 103's clinical record indicated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from a medication error rate of 5 percent or greater when Residents 39 and 34 were not administered three morning medications. A total of 3 medication errors were observed within a sample size of 26 opportunities for error. The facility's medication error rate was 11.54%. These failures had the potential of medications administered to residents as not treating residents effectively and exposing them to medication errors. Findings: On 1/31/2022 at 9:14 A.M., at Station 3, observed RN 1 preparing medications for administration to Resident 39. It was observed that Nevibolol (a medication for blood pressure) 10 mg (milligram - a unit of measure) and ciprofloxacin (medication to treat bacterial infections) 500mg was not available for the 9 AM administration to Resident 39. During medication administration, RN (registered nurse)1 did not inform the resident that the medication was not available. During concurrent interview and record review on 1/31/2022 at 3:20 P.M., RN 1 stated there had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure expired medications were not available for use. 2. Properly label resident medication with open dates, expiration dates and resident identification tags. These failures placed the residents at risk for receiving ineffective or expired medications and had the potential of exposing residents to infections due to cross contamination. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 01/31/2022 at 12:30 P.M. An observation of medication cart at Station 2 with LN 2, one opened package of Advair (medication for treating breathing issue of lungs) 100/50mcg (mcg is a unit of measure) was observed. The package had an open date of 12/18/2021 for Resident 74. LN 2 stated the medication was good for 30 days after opening and expired medications are not effective. LN 2 explained use of expired medications could cause the resident to have symptoms. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) for Resident 74 indicated resident had received the Advair 1 puff inhaled daily as ordered by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained during food storage when: 1. Expired sandwiches were found inside the refrigerator. 2. Two nursing unit refrigerators had expired drinks and the temperatures were out of normal range. These deficient practices had the potential to expose all residents who receive food from the kitchen to unsanitary practices and potentially unsafe foods that could lead to widespread foodborne illness. Findings: 1. On 2/1/22 at 3:20 P.M., an observation and interview with the Food & Nutrition Services Director (FNSD) was conducted. Inside the refrigerator, there were two tuna sandwiches labeled good for January 27, 2022-January 30,2022. The FNSD removed the sandwiches from the refrigerator and were thrown away. On 2/1/22 at 3:30 P.M., an interview with the FNSD was conducted. The FNSD stated, staff should have been checking the dates and removed expired items from the refrigerator to avoid foodborne illness. On 2/3/22 at 10:56 A.M., an interview with the Administrator and the FNSD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to accommodate the needs of three of nine residents (4, 76, and 399). These failure had the potential to affect the resident's dignity, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. The MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 76 had a BIMS score of 15 (a score of 12-15 indicated a resident was cognitively intact), and required the assistance of facility staff to shave. On 8/25/19 at 9 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 76. Resident 76's hair was long, past his shoulders, and he had long facial whiskers. Resident 76 stated he had asked for a haircut and beard trim and had offered to pay for it. Resident 76 stated the facility had not assisted him with having a haircut or his beard trimmed. Resident 76 further stated being unshaven and having unkempt hair made him feel sad and depressed On 8/26/19 at 9:17 A.M., an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to fully promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice for two of 34 sampled Resident's (54, 122). There was a lack of communication amongst staff when Resident 54 requested a room change and when Resident 122 requested possession of own wheelchair for use. The lack of communication did not afford both Residents the opportunity to have their choices honored and ensure continuity of care was maintained. As a result, Resident 54 did not have access to his electric wheelchair, and Resident 122 remained in a room with an incompatible roommate. Findings: 1. Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dialysis (a process to filter blood) and disorders of bone density and structure per the Facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 8/25/19 at 11:20 A.M., an interview with Resident 54 was conducted. Resident 54 stated the facility took his electric wheelchair away and it had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store resident's medical and financial records in a secured location. This failure had the potential for resident's confidential health information, and financial information to be viewed by unauthorized staff, residents and visitors. Findings: On [DATE] at 9:10 A.M., an observation and record review was conducted on Unit 4. Behind an unlocked door, labeled Storage Room, were approximately 40 boxes. Some boxes were labeled Expired, Accounts Payable, and Activities Records. On [DATE] at 8:29 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with the Unit Clerk (UC). The UC opened the unlocked door to the storage room, and stated it contained medical records and should have been locked. On [DATE] at 8:37 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with M1. The M1 stated the janitors were responsible for cleaning the storage room. The M1 opened the door to the storage room and stated it contained medical records. The M 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise care plan interventions for two of 32 sampled residents (67) (138). 1. This failure had the potential to contribute to Resident 67 repeatedly falling and sustaining injuries, affecting his quality of life. 2. This failure had the potential to cause miscommunication about Resident 138's mobility limitations. Findings: 1. Resident 67's record was reviewed: Resident 67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss), per the facility's face sheet. Per the MDS, dated [DATE], Resident 67 required the assistance of one caregiver to transfer (how a resident moves between the bed and wheelchair), and to walk. Per the MDS, Resident 67 had two or more falls without injury. On 8/25/19 at 8:15 A.M., an observation was conducted. Resident 67 was lying in bed and had a large discolored, raised area on the right side of his head, face and neck. There was a bed alarm (alarm that sounds when a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for three of nine residents (400, 46, 101) sampled for activities of daily living when: 1. Resident 400 was not provided assistance when eating. 2. Residents 46 and 101 did not receive assistance with shaving or trimming facial hair. Findings: 1. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 400's nutritional intake. On 8/16/19 Resident 400 was admitted to the facility with diagnosois which included general weakness, and reduced mobility, per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 8/25/19 at 8:50 A.M., an interview with Resident 400 was conducted. Resident 400 stated, my food is always cold because I can't use my hands, others need to feed me and I have to wait. On 8/25/19 at 12:35 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 400. Resident 400 was observed eating lunch in bed. Resident 400's right hand was shakey and most of the dark green vegetable that was in his spoon fell unto a towel that laid on his chest. Resident 400…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently document neurological examinations (an assessment for level of consciousness, pupil reaction, vital signs, sensory and motor responses related to a head injury) for one of three residents (5) reviewed for unwitnessed falls. This failure had the potential for Resident 5 to have an undetected closed head injury with a delay in treatment. Findings: Resident 5 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (stroke) and dementia (memory loss), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 8/25/19 at 10:19 A.M., an observation was made of Resident 5 in his room. Resident 5 was lying in bed with floor mats on both sides of the bed. On 8/26/19 at 3 P.M., a review of Resident 5's clinical record was conducted. Per the facility's Event Report, dated 5/12/19, Resident 5, .had an unwitnessed fall from bed, to landing mat . Resident 5's record was reviewed. Resident 5's neurological examinations after the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to provide proper shift assessments of the Arteriovenous Fistula (The AV Fistula is a blood vessel made wider and stronger by a surgeon to allow blood to flow out to and return from a dialysis machine) for two of nine (137,401) residents who received dialysis services. As a result, Resident 137 and Resident 401 did not receive proper assessment of their AV fistula's which could have hindered or caused complications with their dialysis care. Findings: 1. On 8/02/19 Resident 137 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of end stage renal disease per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. 2. On 8/20/19 Resident 401 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 8/25/19 a t 8:08 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 137. Resident 137 stated she was concerned about her AV Fistula because she could not recall when the nurses at the facility had checked it. On 8/25/19 at 8:20 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 24. LN 24 stated she had provided nursing care for Resident 137 for about three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove a discontinued narcotic (medication with a high potential for abuse) from one of six medication carts reviewed for medication storage. This deficient practice had the potential for diversion (theft) of controlled narcotic medications. Findings: On 8/28/19 at 8:28 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with LN 3 during an inspection of Station 4's medication cart. In the narcotic drawer, behind the discard divider was a bubble pack (package of sealed pill medications on a cardboard sheet). The bubble pack was labeled with Resident 76's name, listed the medication as Ambien (a sedative used for sleep) 5 mg, and was filled on 8/2/19. There were 11 pills remaining in the bubble pack. LN 3 stated Resident 76's Ambien was discontinued on 8/11/19, and the medication was never removed from the medication cart. LN 3 stated the medication should have been given to the DON within 24 hours of being discontinued. LN 3 stated the Ambien could have been diverted, and no one would have known. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to document daily refrigerator temperatures for one of two refrigerators used to store resident food. This deficient practice had the potential for residents food to acquire food borne illnesses when stored at improper temperatures. Findings: On 8/25/19 at 9:16 A.M., an observation was conducted of the resident refrigerator on Station 3. The temperature log taped to the outside of the refrigerator door contained no temperature entries after 8/19/19. Within the resident refrigerator was a clear plastic container of hot peppers, an unopened container of hummus, and a sealed package of orange cheese, all labeled with different resident's names. On 8/25/19 at 3:30 P.M., an interview was conducted with the RD. The RD stated food brought in from the outside for residents consumption, needed to be labeled with the resident's name, room number, and the date received. On 8/25/19 at 3:55 P.M., the RD was observed removing all food and kitchen supplied snacks from the resident refrigerator. On 8/26/19 at 8:12 A.M., a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care with hospice (end of life care) and ensure hospice services were provided for one unsampled resident (46). As a result, there was the potential for Resident 46 to have not received appropriate and timely hospice care services. Findings: Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included lung cancer, per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. Per the physician's order, dated 3/5/19, Resident 46 was admitted to hospice on 3/5/19. On 8/25/19, at 3:59 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 46. Resident 46 had long whiskers on his face. Resident 46 stated the person who was supposed to shave him had not come for three days. On 8/26/19 at 2:15 P.M., an interview with Resident 46 was conducted. Resident 46 stated he was due for a shower and shave and he hoped the person who was supposed to help him was going to come that day. On 8/27/19 at 8:51 A.M., an observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility staff failed to observe infection control precautions for one of 34 (38) sampled residents. This failure had the potential to transmit an infection to other residents, visitors, and staff members. Findings: On 6/19/19 Resident 38 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included Clostridium difficile (a serious bacteria infection) per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 8/25/19 at 9:05 A.M., an observation of Resident 38's room was conducted. There was a sign posted outside Resident 38's room door. Per the sign, Isolation, infection control precautions, please talk to the licensed nurse before entering room. On 8/25/19 at 4:03 P.M., an interview was conducted with HSK 21. HSK 21 stated she was not sure what type of isolation was in place for Resident 38. Hsk 1 stated she was uncertain what precautions needed to be observed before entering Resident 38's room. On 8/26/19 at 12:52 P.M., an interview and record review was conducted with MDS 1. MDS 1 stated Resident 38 was in isolation for Clostridium Difficile…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-05-08 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to post nurse staffing information at the beginning of each shift during three of four days of the survey. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who currently resided in the facility. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, with a copyright date of 2001, revealed, Our facility will post on a daily basis for each shift nurse staffing data, including the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents. The policy specified, 1. Within two (2) hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of licensed nurse (RNs [registered nurses], LPNs [licensed practical nurses], and LVNs [licensed vocational nurses]) and the number of unlicensed nursing personnel (CNAs and NAs) [certified nursing assistants and nurse aides] directly responsible for resident care is posted in a prominent location (accessible to residents and visitors) and in a clear and readable format. During an observation on 05/05/2025 at 9:41…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 2.9 | +2.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRUIST BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 12/07/2023 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| AUSSEF, KAVYON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| LEE, EMMET | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2025 |
| LORENZANA, ANGELICA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/01/2022 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
| FAROOQUI, MOHAMMED | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056040. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.