Palomar Heights Post Acute
1260 E Ohio Avenue, Escondido, CA 92027 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 98 certified beds · (760) 746-1100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent Sep 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,176 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-21)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.9% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.3% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.6% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.6% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.7% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.21 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.26 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 94 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 84.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.72 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.2%CMS range 43.3–63.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.8–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 84.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 73.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 71.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 3.1–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.14 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 82.6 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services according to professional standards of practice to one (Resident 6) of four residents reviewed for quality of care when: 1. The facility did not assess Resident 6's change in condition and, 2. The facility did not notify the physician of Resident 6's change in condition. As a result, the physician was not aware of Resident 6's change of condition and Resident 6 expired. Findings: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (a condition in which the heart does not pump or fill blood as well as it should) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (damaged heart muscle from lack of blood flow) according to the facility's admission Record. During a review of progress notes (PN) written by the assigned night shift nurse for Resident 6 dated [DATE] at 5:20 A.M., the PN indicated the certified nurse assistant (CNA) reported to the charge nurse that resident was not responding.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a 30-minute visual monitoring intervention for one sampled resident (1) reviewed for elopement and wandering after the resident previously eloped from the facility. As a result, Resident 1 was placed at increased risk of another potential elopement.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental health condition with symptoms of hallucinations, delusions and mood alterations) per the facility admission record. A review of the facility's elopement and wandering risk assessment, dated 4/10/26, indicated Resident 1 was assessed as at risk for wandering or elopement. A review of the facility's progress notes for Resident 1 indicated Resident 1 eloped from the facility on 4/16/26 sometime around 8:00 P.M. and returned to the facility the next morning on 4/17/26 at 8:45 A.M. During an observation on 4/21/26 at 2:20 P.M., Resident 1 was sitting in his wheelchair in his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to explain the discharge plan to one of two sampled residents (1). As a result, Resident 1 may not have been aware of the scheduled post-discharge appointment with his physician.Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart failure, and discharged from the facility on 4/3/26. Per the facility's Discharge Summary and Post-Care Instructions V2.0 dated 4/2/26, Resident 1 was to be discharged to home on 4/3/26 with a scheduled appointment with his primary care physician (PCP) on 4/7/26. On 4/16/26 at 10:05 A.M., an interview was conducted with the Case Manager (CM). The CM stated that she scheduled the appointment with Resident 1's PCP, but did not discuss the PCP appointment with Resident 1 or his family because that was the responsibility of the Licensed Nurse (LN) at the time of discharge. On 4/16/26 at 10:14 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 3. LN 3 stated, she conducted the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for one of four sampled residents (1). As a result, Resident 1 was placed at an increased risk of medication side effects.Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart failure, and discharged from the facility on 4/3/26. Per the facility's Medication administration Record for March 2026, Resident 1 had orders for Amlodipine (a medication to lower blood pressure) 5 milligrams (MG), isosorbide mononitrate (a medication to lower blood pressure) extended release 30 MG, and lisinopril (a medication to lower blood pressure) 5 MG. All three medications were ordered to be given every day, but not to administer if Resident 1's systolic blood pressure was less than 110. On 3/1/26 Licensed Nurse (LN) 2 documented that they administered all three medications and that his systolic blood pressure was 106 at the time of administration. On 4/28/26 at 9:04 A.M., a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at Resident 1's bedside table for 1 out of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for ingestion of the medications. Findings.An unannounced visit to the facility was conducted on 2/17/26 relative to an anonymous complaint regarding the quality of care the facility provides. A review of the facility's undated admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encounter attention to gastrostomy (a medical device inserted through the abdomen directly into the stomach to deliver nutrition, fluids and medication) and seizures (a sudden uncontrolled surge of electrical activity in the brain). During a tour of the facility on 2/17/26 at 10:15 A.M., Resident 1 was observed lying in bed with his eyes closed. A clear plastic cup was observed with medications crushed mixed in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). when Resident 1's medication left unattended at Resident 1's bedside was documented as being given. This failure created inaccurate information which could affect Resident 1's plan of care. Findings. An unannounced visit to the facility was conducted on 2/17/26 relative to an anonymous complaint regarding the quality of care the facility provides. A review of the facility's undated admission record indicated resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encounter attention to gastrostomy (GT- a medical device inserted through the abdomen directly into the stomach to deliver nutrition, fluids and medication) and seizures (a sudden uncontrolled surge of electrical activity in the brain). During a tour of the facility on 2/17/26 at 10:15 A.M., Resident 1 was observed lying in bed with his eyes closed. A clear plastic cup was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to professional standards of practice for one of 24 sampled residents (41) and four unsampled residents (63,80, 191, 36) reviewed for pharmacy services when: 1. Resident 63's Aspirin 81 mg chewable (a prescribed medication as a stroke prophylaxis) was administered over the one hour allotted time frame. 2. The manufacturer's instructions for Fluticasone nasal spray (a nasal spray for allergies) was not followed when the medication was administered to Resident 191. 3. Resident 41's G-tube (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings or medications to be administered directly to the stomach) was not properly auscultated for placement before medication administration. In addition, the Licensed Nurse (LN 35) did not administer the resident's medication by gravity. 4. Controlled medications (drugs with high abuse potential) prescribed to Resident 80 and Resident 36 could not be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled according to acceptable standard of practice during an inspection of two of three medication carts, and one of two medication rooms when: 1. Expired insulin (medication to lower blood sugar levels) was stored in a medication cart. 2. Ipratropium/albuterol inhalation (breathing medication) was stored unprotected from light in the medication cart. 3. A box of Ampicillin 3 grams vials was stored inside a drawer in the medication room without the medication label. These failures had the potential for medications to have reduced effectiveness and/or medication misuse. Findings: On [DATE] at 2:34 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 35. LN 35's assigned medication cart was inspected. Ipratropium/albuterol inhalation vials were kept in a foil packing in a box that had the lid open. The medication was exposed to light when the medication cart was opened. LN 35 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to cook food in a way to preserve the palatability of the food. As a result, residents may not want to eat the food served to them and have the potential for weight loss. Findings: 1. After the initial resident screening and confidential group interview it was determined there were resident complaints about the food served at the facility. The resident complaints included the food was served cold and did not taste good. During initial tour from 5/27/25 to 5/28/25 the following resident comments regarding food complaints were: On 5/27/25 at 08:28 A.M., during the initial screening Resident 36 stated the food does not taste good and looks cheap. Resident 56 stated food needs more variety food looks thrown together and worse on weekends the food issue has been brought up in resident council, but still feels food has not changed. On 5/27/25 at 8:47 A.M., Resident 6 stated the food was served cold at times. On 5/27/25 at 9:12 A.M., Resident 291 stated she did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAA-facility group that monitors concerning trends in a facility) failed to identify and include in the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI-plan developed by QAA to help improve conditions in the facility) Plan, trends found by surveyors during the recertification and relicensing survey concerning resident's nailcare and grooming, and the annual staff performance evaluations. This failure had the potential for the facility to overlook trends in resident care that might have affected residents' dignity and/or health and staff performance. Cross Reference: F677, F730 Findings: On 5/30/25 at 2 P.M., a concurrent interview with the Administrator (ADM) and the Director of Nursing (DON) and a review of QAPI program was conducted. The DON stated that the main areas that the QAPI team monitored were:1. Call lights, 2. Falls, and 3.Urinary Tract Infections (UTI). During the recertification and relicensing survey, deficient trends in the following areas were identified by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 6 sampled residents reviewed for resident dignity was provided care in a manner that promoted dignity and respect. (Resident 57) This deficient practice had the potential to intimidate and be disrespectful towards the resident. Findings: Resident 57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia, orophangeal phase (mouth and/or throat swallowing problem) according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation on 5/27/25 at 8:25 A.M., Resident 57 was in bed with a breakfast tray on the overbed table. Two Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) arrived and repositioned Resident 57 in a sitting position in bed. CNA 2 then fed Resident 57 while standing up next to Resident 57's bed. During a joint observation and interview on 5/27/25 at 8:33 A.M. with CNA 1, CNA 1 looked at CNA 2 feeding Resident 57 from Resident 57's doorway. CNA 1 stated while feeding a resident who was in bed, staff should sit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 43 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist with or obtain an Advanced Directive (AD-a legal document that allows a person to specify their healthcare preferences in the event that residents become unable to make medical decisions for themselves due to illness, injury, or other circumstances) for two of 24 sampled residents (Residents 22 & 56). This deficient practice placed Residents 22 & 56 at risk for not having their medical treatment wishes known or followed during a health emergency. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 22's admission Record indicated Resident 22 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). On 5/29/25 at 3:12 P.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the Social Service Director (SSD). The SSD stated an AD was obtained upon admission and discussed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of 24 residents (33, 56, 76, 27) had a safe and homelike environment when the facility did not: 1. Replace or reimburse lost belongings for Resident 33. 2. Provide a living environment that was clean and well maintained for Residents 56, 76 and 27. As a result, Resident 33 did not have the ability to have a different shirt for each day of the week. In addition, there was the potential for Residents 56, 76 and 27 to feel uncomfortable in their environment. Findings: 1. On 5/27/25 at 3:07 P.M., during initial screening, Resident 33 was interviewed. Resident 33 stated he was missing cloths, specifically the facility could not find 3 of his shirts. Resident 33 stated he notified the facility, but they had not replaced or reimbursed, the lost shirts. Resident 33 stated he was told they were waiting for corporate's decision on replacing or reimbursing the shirts. On 5/28/25 at 9:30 A.M., the Social Services Director (SSD) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review, a Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) to determine the Significant Change of Status Assessment (SCSA-an improvement or decline), and/or update a care plan for one of five residents sampled (Resident 9) according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI-MDS manual). This deficient practice placed Resident 9 for delayed care planning and unmet care needs. Cross-Reference F640 and F657 Findings: A review of Resident 9's admission Record indicated Resident 9 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of pulmonary fibrosis (a lung disease that occurs when lung tissue becomes damaged and scarred making it hard to breath). A review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS, a federal agency) RAI Manual 3.0 October 2024, (Page 2-25) .After the IDT (Interdisclipnary Team) has determined that a resident meets the significant change in the resident's status in the clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) and Care Area Assessment (CAA) on time, as required by the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI-MDS manual), for one of five sampled residents (Resident 9). This deficient practice placed Resident 9 at risk for delays in care planning and unmet care needs. Cross-Reference F637 and F657 Findings: A review of Resident 9's admission Record indicated Resident 9 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of pulmonary fibrosis (is a lung disease that occurs when lung tissue becomes damaged and scarred making it hard to breath). A record review of Resident 9's MDS dated [DATE] Section Z indicated, a signature completion dated 5/15/25. The transmission report indicated: .Assessment Completion Late: Z0500B (assessment completion date) is more than 14 days after A2300 (assessment reference date [ARD]) . .Care Plan Completed Late: V0200B2 (CAA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan that included activities based on resident's preferences for one of five sampled residents (Resident 9). This deficient practice placed Resident 9 at risk for not having their individual needs and interests supported, which could negatively affect their emotional well-being and quality of life. Cross-Reference F679 Findings: A review of Resident 9's admission Record indicated Resident 9 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A record review of Resident 9's minimum data set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 4/30/25 indicated, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- developed by reviewing the resident's status during the prior seven-day period) score of 12 points out of 15 possible points which indicated Resident 9 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update the care plan after a Significant Change of Status Assessment (SCSA), as required by the federal guidelines, for one of five sampled residents (Resident 9). This deficient practice placed Resident 9 at risk for receiving care that did not reflect their current condition, which could delay needed support, and negatively affecting their health and well-being. Cross-Reference F637 and F640 Findings: A review of Resident 9's admission Record indicated Resident 9 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of pulmonary fibrosis (is a lung disease that occurs when lung tissue becomes damaged and scarred making it hard to breath). A clinical chart review of Resident 9's activities of daily living (ADL- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves) care plan revised date 1/25/25 did not include SCSA updated information of Resident 9's improvement. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of six residents, who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL-self- care activities such as grooming, bathing, and toileting), received assistance with nail care (cleaning, trimming and/or filing of nails) and shaving (Resident 5, 26 and 39). This failure resulted in residents having long and dirty fingernails which had the potential to negatively impact the residents' self-esteem and comfort. Findings: Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain) according to the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 5's care plan initiated on 2/2/23 indicated, Resident .requires assistance related to impaired mobility .Will provide assistance with ADLs as indicated. During an observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meaningful activities that matched the preferences and needs of one of five sampled residents (Resident 9) based on their comprehensive, resident-centered care plan and assessment. This deficient practice placed Resident 9 at risk for decreased mental and emotional well-being, social isolation, and reduced quality of life. Cross-References F656 Findings: A review of Resident 9's admission Record indicated Resident 9 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A record review of Resident 9's minimum data set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 4/30/25 indicated, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- developed by reviewing the resident's status during the prior seven-day period) score of 12 points out of 15 possible points which indicated Resident 9 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents reviewed for accidents was free of accidents during the use of a Hoyer lift (mechanical lift device used to move immobile residents). (Resident 26) This failure resulted in the Hoyer lift hitting Resident 26's left knee which caused Resident 26 pain. Findings: Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness and chronic venous hypertension (persistent high blood pressure in the veins, typically in the legs) with inflammation (redness and swelling) of left lower extremity according to the facility's admission Record. During an interview on 5/27/25 at 9:20 A.M. with Resident 26, Resident 26 stated a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) weighed him on 5/26/25. Resident 26 stated the CNA caused him pain because the sling (supports the body which connects to the lift) was not applied correctly and the metal part of the lift hit his left knee. Resident 26 stated he had arthritis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 40) with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) out of 24 sampled residents received trauma-informed care. This failure had the potential to re-trigger trauma for Resident 40. Findings: Review of admission Record for Resident 40 indicated she was admitted on [DATE] for diagnoses which included fractured left Radial Styloid Process (a bony projection located on the lower end of the forearm) , Seizures (a sudden, temporary disturbance in brain activity that causes changes in behavior, movement, sensation, or consciousness), Repeated Falls, Traumatic Brain Injury (a disruption of the normal function or structure of the brain caused by an external force), and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (a mental health condition that's caused by an extremely stressful or terrifying event). Review of MDS Section C-Cognitive (thinking processes) Patterns indicated a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure employee performance evaluations were completed annually for two of five Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) reviewed for performance reviews. This deficient practice had the potential for CNAs to provide inadequate care to the residents. Findings: A concurrent record review and interview was conducted with the Director of Staff Development on 5/30/25 at 8:02 A.M. The DSD checked five CNA files for performance evaluations which indicated the following: CNA 8 was hired by the facility on 4/27/23 and there were no performance evaluations completed for 2024 and 2025. CNA 9 was hired by the facility on 1/25/22 and there were no performance evaluations completed for 2023 and 2025. The DSD stated it was important for employees to have evaluations to know the needs of the employees to better care for the residents. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/30/25 at 10:39 A.M., the DON stated employee evaluations should be completed annually to evaluate the employee's attendance, skills, goals and the need for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the meal tray diets were verified by a licensed nurse prior to distributing to residents. As a result, the residents may have been given a diet that was incorrect. Findings: On 5/28/25 the lunch trays were brought to the floor at 12:51 P.M. Licensed Nurse 21 was observed verifying the tray cards and the food on the plate were correct. LN 21 was observed to only open the lid of a few trays, LN 21 did not open the lid on every tray to observe what was actually on the plate against the tray card. On 5/28/25 an interview was conducted with LN 21. LN 21 stated that she only lifted the lids on therapeutic diets that would prevent choking. LN 21 did not see what was on a regular tray. LN 21 did not verify for allergies or specific resident requests.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse (LN 37) documented a resident incident in the resident's clinical record for one of 24 sampled residents (48). As a result of this failure, it could not be determined if Resident 48 had fallen on 5/15/25. Findings: A review of Resident 48's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included S/P (status post) stroke, vascular dementia, (having to do with the blood vessels and circulation), and mild cognitive impairment. On 5/27/25 at 11:15 A.M., a telephone interview was conducted with Resident 48's Responsible Party (RP). The RP stated that she received a call from Resident 48 on 5/16/25 at 9:22 A.M. The RP stated that Resident 48 told her she had fallen and hit her head the night before. The RP stated two staff members helped get Resident 48 up. The RP stated she then spoke to the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) to report what Resident 48 had told her and the ADON stated there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a process for communicating hospice services for one of two residents reviewed for hospice services (Resident 5). This failure had the potential to put Resident 5 at risk for uncoordinated medical care and treatment between the facility and the hospice agency. Findings: Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain) according to the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 5's physician's orders (PO) in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was conducted on [DATE] at 10:27 A.M. The PO indicated, ADMIT TO ALL THINGS HOSPICE ON ROUTINE LEVEL OF CARE DIAGNOSIS: END STAGE STROKE . dated [DATE]. During a concurrent record review and interview on [DATE] at 9:15 A.M. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, LN 1 stated residents who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practices by not discarding an unlabeled intravenous (IV) hydration bag and uncapped IV tubing that was left hanging in a residents room, for one of 5 sampled residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice placed facility residents at risk for exposure to infection and the spread of harmful bacteria. Findings: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2024, INJECTION SAFETY GUIDELINES, indicated, .IV bags, tubing and connectors are intended for single-patient use only and should be discarded immediately after use . A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated Resident 2 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV- a virus [tiny germ] that attacks the body's immune system). A record review of Resident 2's minimum data set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 4/3/25 indicated, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
F883 Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations §483.80(d) Influenza and pneumococcal immunizations §483.80(d)(1) Influenza. The facility must develop policies and procedures to ensure that- (i) Before offering the influenza immunization, each resident or the resident ' s representative receives education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunization; (ii) Each resident is offered an influenza immunization October 1 through March 31 annually, unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized during this time period; (iii) The resident or the resident ' s representative has the opportunity to refuse immunization; and (iv)The resident ' s medical record includes documentation that indicates, at a minimum, the following: (A) That the resident or resident ' s representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of influenza immunization; and (B) That the resident either received the influenza immunization or did not receive the influenza immunization due to medical contraindications or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent Resident 1 from falling while transferring from bed to a wheelchair with nonfunctioning brakes. This failure had the potential to cause injury due to unnecessary falls caused by nonfunctioning brakes on Resident 1 ' s wheelchair. Cross Reference F908 Findings: Review of admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acquired absence of left leg below the knee, difficulty in walking, and unspecified glaucoma (chronic eye disease that occurs when fluid builds up in the eye, damaging the optic nerve and causing vision loss or blindness). Review of History and Physical dated 12/11/23 indicated, .She is limited by a left BKA (Below the knee amputation-surgical removal of leg below the knee .Bed mobility: Independent, Transfer: Independent, Dressing: Independent .Orientation to time, place, and person: Patient appears moderately disoriented . Review of MDS section C-Cognitive Patterns dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medical equipment (wheelchair) was maintained in good, proper condition on one of one resident (Resident 1) reviewed for medical equipment. As a result, Resident 1 fell due to the wheelchair's brakes not functioning. Cross Reference F689 Findings: Review of admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Acquired absence of left leg below the knee, difficulty in walking, and unspecified glaucoma (chronic eye disease that occurs when fluid builds up in the eye, damaging the optic nerve and causing vision loss or blindness). Review of History and Physical dated 12/11/23 indicated, .She is limited by a left BKA (Below the knee amputation-surgical removal of leg below the knee .Bed mobility: Independent, Transfer: Independent, Dressing: Independent .Orientation to time, place, and person: Patient appears moderately disoriented . Review of MDS section C-Cognitive Patterns dated 8/2/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency for one of two sampled residents (1). As a result, the State Survey Agency ' s abuse investigation was delayed. Findings: Per the facility ' s admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include functional quadriplegia (inability to move most of the body including the arms and legs). Per the facility ' s admission Record, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (a physical and mental decline). On 2/26/24 at 11:38 A.M., an interview and review of the Abuse Log was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated, Resident 1 made an allegation on 1/18/24 that Resident 2 hit her. The DON further stated, they documented the allegation in their Abuse Log, but did not notify the State Survey Agency of the allegation of abuse. On 2/26/24 at 11:43 A.M., an interview was conducted with the DON and the Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision for one of three residents with a fall history (Resident 2). As a result, Resident 2 had a repeat fall and sustained injuries. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a condition characterized by loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities) and repeated falls according to the facility ' s admission Record. A review of the facility ' s document titled, Fall Risk Observation/Assessment, dated 9/29/23 indicated a score of 20. The document indicated, .A. Low risk 0-8 B. Moderate risk 9-15 C. High risk 16-42 . During a review of Resident 2 ' s progress notes (PN) dated 10/11/23, the PN indicated Resident 2 was found on the floor face down with swelling on the right eye, nosebleed, and erythema (redness) on both upper arms. During a review of the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- team members with various areas of expertise who work together toward the goals…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to check the blood sugar as ordered for one of two sampled residents (1). As a result, Resident 1 had an episode of low blood sugar which was not immediately identified. Findings: Per the facility ' s admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes (abnormal blood sugar levels). Per the facility ' s Progress Note, dated 1/26/23 at 2:52 P.M., .The change in condition/s .were .altered level of consciousness .labored or rapid breathing .chest pain/tightness .Resident presented signs of slurred speech . Per the facility ' s Progress Note, dated 1/26/23 at 9:07 P.M., .paramedics were called to have resident taken to ER (hospital emergency room). Once paramedics arrived, resident was found with a critically low blood glucose (sugar) level . Per the facility ' s Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 11/21/23, there was an order on 11/19/22 to check Resident 1 ' s blood sugar levels before meals and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow and implement policies and procedures for an allegation of abuse when, 1. The facility did not provide results of an abuse investigation within five days of the incident for Resident 4 and, 2. The alleged perpetrator was not placed on administrative leave until completion of the abuse investigation. This failure had the potential for Resident 4 and other residents to be vulnerable and exposed to the alleged perpetrator. In addition, this failure resulted in the delay of the facility's investigation of abuse allegation, and a delay in determining the occurrence of abuse. Findings: Resident 4 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included traumatic brain injury (a sudden and violent blow to the head causing damage to the brain) and bipolar disorder (a mental illness causing intense mood swings from one extreme to another) according to the facility's admission Record. An observation and interview were conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1 was free from involuntary seclusion (confined to room against her will) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, tied a plastic bag from Resident 1's door to the hallway handrail to prevent Resident 1 from wandering outside the room while undressed. This failure had the potential to result in psychosocial trauma or unwitnessed fall for Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and repeated falls. Resident 1's brief interview for mental status (BIMS - used regularly to measure and track a resident's cognitive decline) was a 3, which meant, severe cognitive impairment. During an interview on 2/4/22 at 11:15 A.M., with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), she stated at approximately 5:15 P.M. on 1/27/22, .the maintenance manager (MM) came to my office stating there was a plastic bag…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-17 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a quarterly (every 92 days) MDS assessment for 11 of 18 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 15, 17, 22, and 32). This failure had the potential for any changes to the resident's clinical status to go unrecognized and unmonitored. Findings: On 3/17/22 at 4 P.M. a record review was conducted. Per the MDS 3.0 Resident Assessments list: Resident 3 was due for a Quarterly MDS assessment on 12/22/21. Resident 3's MDS status was indicated as, Finalized. Resident 4 was due for a Quarterly MDS assessment on 1/4/22. Resident 4's MDS status was indicated as, In process. Resident 5 was due for a Quarterly MDS assessment on 12/18/21. Resident 5's MDS status was indicated as, In process. Resident 6 was due for a Quarterly MDS assessment on 12/19/21. Resident 6's MDS status was indicated as, In process. Resident 7 was due for a Quarterly MDS assessment on 12/28/21. Resident 7's MDS status was indicated as, In process. Resident 8 was due for a Quarterly MDS assessment on 1/10/22. Resident 8's MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-17 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit and transmit MDS assessments for 18 of 18 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 22, and 32). This failure had the potential to result in delayed quality measurements from the data. Findings: On 3/17/22 at 4 P.M. a record review was conducted. Per the MDS 3.0 Resident Assessments list: Resident 1 was due for a Discharge MDS assessment on 10/22/21. Resident 1's MDS status was indicated as, In process. Resident 2 was due for a Discharge MDS assessment on 10/22/21. Resident 2's MDS status was indicated as, In process. Resident 3 was due for a Quarterly MDS assessment on 12/22/21. Resident 3's MDS status was indicated as, Finalized. Resident 4 was due for a Quarterly MDS assessment on 1/4/22. Resident 4's MDS status was indicated as, In process. Resident 5 was due for a Quarterly MDS assessment on 12/18/21. Resident 5's MDS status was indicated as, In process. Resident 6 was due for a Quarterly MDS assessment on 12/19/21. Resident 6's MDS status was indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-17 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility did not ensure the Dietary Supervisor (DS) was competent to oversee the food and nutrition services at the facility when: 1. The DS did not follow the manufacturers guidelines when cleaning the kitchen's ice machine. 2. The DS did not have a kitchen cleaning schedule per the facility's policy. 3. The DS did not conduct proper oversite of the food and nutrition service staff to competently perform their job duties when: a. A Dietary employee did not wear a mask while preparing food. b. Dietary employees did not do hand hygiene after loading the dishwasher with dirty dishes. c. Dietary employees did not correctly label and date foods in the kitchen per the facility's policy. d. A cook did not prepare food in a form designed to meet the individual needs for residents on a mechanical soft and a chopped solid diet. e. A cook did not follow the approved menu and recipe. 4. The DS did not follow the facility's policy when requesting kitchen equipment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-17 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review the facility did not ensure food and nutrition service staff were able to competently carry out their job duties when: 1. A Dietary employee did not wear a mask while preparing food. 2. Dietary employees did not do hand hygiene after loading the dishwasher with dirty dishes. 3. Dietary employees did not correctly label and date foods in the kitchen per the facility's policy. As a result, residents were at risk for foodborne illnesses. 1. On 3/14/22 at 8:40 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with [NAME] 1. [NAME] 1 was observed preparing potatoes without wearing a mask over his mouth or nose. [NAME] 1 stated it was the facility's policy he must wear a mask when in the kitchen. On 3/15/22 at 3:08 P.M. an interview was conducted with the DS. The DS stated the cook should be wearing a mask at all times while in the kitchen to prevent the spread of infection. On 3/15/22 a facility document titled Universal Source Control was reviewed. The document indicated, .All staff, regardless of vaccination status, shall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review the facility's food and nutrition services did not follow the approved menu or recipe when: 1. A cook did not follow the recipe when he prepared pureed food for lunch. 2. A cook prepared food for lunch that was not listed on the facility's approved lunch menu. 3. A cook did not use correct measuring scoops per the menu when preparing lunch trays. As a result, residents at the facility were at risk for nutritional deficits and weight loss. 1. On 3/16/22 at 10:43 A.M., a concurrent observation, document review and interview was conducted with [NAME] 1. [NAME] 1 was observed placing nine servings of cooked broccoli into the blender to prepare the lunch puree. Cook 1 was observed adding three heaping spoonfuls of chicken broth base, using a disposable plastic spoon, directly into the blender. [NAME] 1 was observed pouring water from a clear unmarked cylinder type container into the blender. [NAME] 1 stated he was not sure how much water he was using but stated it was about a half cup. [NAME] 1 was observed adding two heaping spoonfuls…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, document review and interview, the facility's food and nutrition services did not prepare food in a form that met the individuals needs. As a result, residents on a mechanical soft and a chopped solid diet were at risk for choking. On 3/14/22 at 12:41 P.M., an observation was conducted in the facility's dining room. Resident 21 and Resident 254 were observed eating lunch. Both Resident 21 and Resident 254 had mechanical soft trays per the meal tickets located on the trays. Resident 21 and 254 were observed with a broccoli salad with large 1-1.5 inch in diameter of partially cooked whole broccoli florets with stems. Resident 51 was observed trying to eat a large raw broccoli floret which was approximately 2-2.5 inches in diameter. Resident 51's tray ticket indicated he was prescribed a chopped solid diet. When notified, the facility staff immediately removed the broccoli salads from the residents' meal trays. On 3/14/22 at 12:45 P.M., a concurrent observation and interview were conducted with the DS. The DS stated the whole pieces of broccoli in the mechanical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for one of two sampled resident (154). As a result, Resident 154 was at risk for injury, pain or mental anguish. Findings: Resident 154 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia (an impairment of brain function, such as memory loss and judgment) and cerebral infarction (stroke), per the Resident Face Sheet. On 3/14/22 at 1:10 P.M., Resident 154 was observed in his bed, awake and alert. Resident 154 did not respond verbally to questions, and waved both hands in the air, pointing to a feeding pump (a device used to provide liquid nutrition through a feeding tube) at the side of the bed. Resident 154 appeared unable to speak. On 3/14/22 at 3 P.M., the Admin reported an incident which occurred between Resident 154 and CNA 21. Per the Admin, CNA 21 had been suspended pending an investigation. On 3/16/22 at 2:31 P.M., an interview was conducted with the DON. Per the DON, CNA 21 had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive MDS (a standardized assessment and care planning tool) was completed within the required timeframe for three of 18 residents reviewed for MDS completion (13, 14, 16). This failure had the potential for Residents 13, 14 and 16 to not receive the appropriate care. On 3/17/22 at 4 P.M., a record review was conducted. Resident 13 was due for an annual MDS assessment on 1/8/22. Per the MDS 3.0 Resident Assessments list, the annual review was, In process. Resident 14 was due for an annual MDS assessment on 1/8/22. Per the MDS 3.0 Resident Assessments list, the annual review was, In process. Resident 16 was due for an annual MDS assessment on 1/15/22. Per the MDS 3.0 Resident Assessments list, the annual review status was, In process. On 3/17/22 at 4:12 P.M., a telephone interview was conducted with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC). The MDSC stated he was aware the MDS assessments were late, and he was doing his best to catch up while the facility attempted to hire a full-time MDSC. The MDSC stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for two of 14 sampled residents when: 1. Resident 11 was not provided continuity of care when a dentist appointment was not scheduled, and 2. Residents 11 and 25 were not provided wound care per physician orders. These failures resulted in delays in treatments for the residents. Findings: 1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the Resident Face Sheet. On 3/15/22 at 10:20 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 11. Resident 11 stated he was seen by the dentist in the facility one week ago and was told he needed to go to the dental office for treatment. He stated that he had not heard any follow up from the staff since then. On 3/16/22 at 8 A.M., a record review was conducted. A physician's Progress Note, dated 3/2/22, indicated a dental office appointment was to be scheduled for Resident 11. On 3/16/22 at 8:33 A.M., an interview with the SSD was conducted. The SSD stated that she had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in a safe operating condition. As a result, the steam table had the potential for causing foodborne illnesses by not holding foods at appropriate temperatures. On 3/14/22 at 8:40 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the DS. Standing water and tan/white marks were observed on a shelf under the steam table. The DS stated the steam table had been leaking. On 3/16/22 at 10:29 A.M., an interview was conducted with the DS. The DS stated he was aware the steam table in the kitchen was leaking and was notified by the kitchen on Saturday 3/12/22 verbally from the DS. On 3/16/22 a facility document titled Food & Nutrition-Administrator's Monthly Inspection Checklist dated 1/29/22 was reviewed. The document indicated there was no repair done for an unidentified kitchen equipment repair. On 3/16/22 at 4:14 P.M., a concurrent interview and document review was conducted with the RD. The RD stated she conducted the monthly kitchen evaluation rounds and completes the Food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary practices were met in the facility's kitchen. 1. There was no label on the bulk cereal bin. 2. The bulk flour and thickener bins had no lids. 3. Nestle Café coffee drink dispenser was not clean with old dark black grime on it. 4. The industrial can opener was not clean as it was covered with dark black grime and dark black remnants. 5. A dented can was stored in the the ready for use storage area. 6. Containers of resident ice cream were kept in a small stand-alone refrigerator that were found below the required temperature. 7. Spoiled onions were in an open bin underneath the kitchen steamer and small nats/fruit flies were flying around the bin. 8. The food trays were being used wet and not allowed to air dry. 9. Three cutting boards were noted to be dirty with black smear stains and chips on them. 10. Dust and old food particles landed on clean dishes kept in an open bin. 11. The clean dishes used for resident food had small black spots on them. 12. The stove had dirt, old grease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident requested modifications made to the Physician's Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST-instructions for care provided in a medical emergency) were signed by the physician for two of three residents (9, 54) sampled for advance directives (person's wishes regarding medical treatment). This failure had the potential to affect the treatment and provided to the residents in the event of a medical emergency. Findings: 1a. Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 11/7/19 at 8:23 A.M., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the SSD. The SSD stated the POLST was a physician's order, which required a signature by a physician to be valid. The SSD stated if a resident requested a change to the POLST, a new POLST form would need to be completed, and signed by the physician. The SSD reviewed Resident 54's POLST and stated it was originally dated and signed by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan for one of 18 sampled residents (8) was revised to reflect a change in condition related to contractures (shortening and hardening of muscles). The failure had the potential for miscommunication amongst care givers and decreased well-being of the resident. Findings: Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of non-traumatic (spontaneous and acute) subdural hemorrhage (clot of blood that develops between the surface of the brain that ruptures), functional quadriplegia (the complete inability to move due to severe disability), encounter for palliative care (hospice Care, end of life care) per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 11/04/19 at 10:13 A.M., an observation of Resident 8 was conducted. Resident 8 was lying in bed on his back, with lower extremities pulled upward under the blankets, mouth open. Resident 8 had a left arm contracture with a brace applied, and a left hand contracture with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care that met professional standards of practice when: 1. Treatment and assessment were not done for Resident 31's left great toe wound. 2. Resident 45's emotional well being was not assessed. 3. Physician's orders were not followed for Resident 18. 4. A change of condition was not reported to the physician for Resident 18. This failure had the potential to affect the residents' physical health, and psychological well-being. Findings: 1. Per the facility's Resident Face Sheet, Resident 31 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included peripheral neuropathy (nerve damage in the legs that decreases the ability to feel pain or discomfort) and peripheral edema (swelling of the lower extremities that can inhibit blood flow to a wound). On 11/4/19, Resident 31's record was reviewed: According to a comprehensive assessment of Resident 31's functioning (MDS), dated [DATE], Resident 31 had trouble making decisions about his every day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure staff acted within their scope of practice when oxygen therapy was provided to one of three residents (18) sampled for oxygen use. This failure affected Resident 18's ability to breathe, which could have affected his physical health and psychological well-being. Findings: Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-difficulty breathing), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 11/4/19 at 3:33 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 18. Resident 18 was wearing a nasal cannula (tubing that delivers oxygen to the nose) and an oxygen concentrator (machine that produces oxygen) was on. The dial on the oxygen concentrator indicated Resident 18 was receiving an oxygen flow of 3 liters per minute (LPM). Resident 18 stated he required oxygen to help him breathe. On 11/5/19 at 8:18 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted. Resident 18 sat in a wheelchair in his room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an expired hydrogen peroxide solution and a bottle of lotion with an unreadable label, had been removed. As a result, there was potential for a resident to receive care with an expired hydrogen peroxide solution and/or receive the incorrect lotion treatment. Findings: On [DATE] at 8:32 A.M., an observation of the treatment cart and an interview with the WCMN was conducted. A hydrogen peroxide bottle had expired in [DATE] and was available for use on the treatment cart. In addition, a bottle of lotion with an altered and unreadable pharmacy label was kept in the treatment cart. The WCMN stated both the hydrogen peroxide and the lotion with an unreadable pharmacy label should have been removed from the treatment cart in order to prevent use of both treatments. On [DATE] at 8:53 A.M., an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated the facility should have removed the hydrogen peroxide from the cart and removed the lotion with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-07 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a food service observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure dietary staff competency when: 1. One kitchen staff member was unable to articulate or demonstrate how to correctly calibrate a thermometer used to assure proper temperature of resident food. 2. One kitchen staff member used the incorrect scoop size when preparing food trays. This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for widespread foodborne illness and receive an incorrect portion of food. Findings: 1. On 11/6/19 at 6:50 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with the DDS/RD and [NAME] 1. [NAME] 1 stated, I never calibrate this particular thermometer, because it is provided by the supervisors, so it doesn't need to be calibrated. [NAME] 1 was unable to explain or demonstrate how to calibrate any of the thermometers available in the kitchen. On 11/6/19 at 8:15 A.M., an interview and observation was conducted with the DDS/RD and [NAME] 1. The DDS/RD asked [NAME] 1 if the thermometers had been calibrated this morning, [NAME] 1 stated, no, not this morning. The DDS/RD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-07 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 11/4/19 at 1:12 P.M., an observation was conducted. CNA 1 retrieved a meal cart from the kitchen and pushed it down the hallway. CNA 1 removed a meal tray from the cart and delivered it to Resident 45, then exited the room. On 11/4/19 at 1:20 P.M., an interview with CNA 1 was conducted. CNA 1 stated he brought the meal cart down the hall and had delivered the trays to resident's in their rooms. CNA 1 stated dietary staff had been responsible for ensuring the correct diet was placed on a resident's meal tray. CNA 1 stated it was important resident's received the correct diet, because if they had been given the wrong consistency of foods, the resident could choke. On 11/4/19 at 1:30 P.M., an observation and interview is conducted with Resident 45. Resident 45's tray ticket (a paper which indicated likes, dislikes, allergies, special requests and diet) indicated he was to have received peaches or pears at lunch, and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation in the Medication Administration Record (MAR), for one of 18 residents (21) sampled for nutrition. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 21's nutritional status, and cause weight loss. Findings: Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included protein-calorie malnutrition (nutrient deficiency causing muscle wasting and weight loss), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 11/5/19 at 8:05 A.M., an observation was conducted. Resident 21 was calling out Hello, come take this and pointed to her breakfast tray. On the breakfast tray was an unopened carton of health shake (nutritional supplement). CNA 5 removed the breakfast tray with the unopened carton of health shake from Resident 21's room. On 11/5/19 at 8:09 A.M., an interview was conducted with CNA 5. CNA 5 stated Resident 21 was unable to open the health shake carton without assistance. CNA 5 stated if a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: 1. Proper handwashing was not implemented by an LN when caring for one of two residents (173) sampled for infections and 2. Oxygen concentrators (machines that create oxygen) had not been serviced for one of three residents (44) sampled for oxygen. These failures had the potential to spread infection to the residents, visitors and facility staff. Findings: 1. Resident 173 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Enterocolitis (inflammation of both the small intestine and the colon). due to clostridium difficile (c -difficile, a bacterium that can cause symptoms ranging from diarrhea to life-threatening inflammation of the colon), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 11/06/19 at 8:07 A.M., a joint observation and interview was conducted with LN 4. LN 4 applied gown and gloves prior to entering resident room then provided resident care. After…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,176 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $8,176 — penalty dated 2024-06-21
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-10 for 9 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROVIDENCE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/15/2022 |
| WARR, BRANDON | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/01/2022 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/15/2022 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/15/2022 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/15/2022 |
| MURRAY, JASON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/15/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $688K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555764. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.