No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Fountain Valley Post Acute

11680 Warner Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 · For profit - Corporation · 151 certified beds · (714) 241-9800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (714) 241-9800 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — most recent Jan 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (77) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
11420 Warner Ave · (714) 665-1661 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
17150 Newhope St Ste 511 · (714) 842-0101 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
17235 Newhope St · (714) 434-6500 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Helm Park0.2 mi
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.4%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.9%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.0%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.1%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.5%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.9%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.4%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.8%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.2%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.042.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.911.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 226 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.94U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.40hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.48hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 145 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.94 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.1%CMS range 47.0–61.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 7.6–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.9%CMS range 6.1–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.181.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
1.21
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.50
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.14
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
37.7%
Total nursing turnover
21.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 151 beds and averages 138.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.27 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

25
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-13)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

77 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 67 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided with the appropriate respiratory care. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1's oxygen tubing was changed accordingly. This failure had the potential to lead to respiratory infection and affect the overall health status of Resident 1.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Administration (undated) showed the oxygen is administered under orders of the physician. The oxygen therapy is administered by way of an oxygen mask, nasal cannula, and/or nasal catheter. On 5/14/26 at 1152 hours, Resident 1 was observed wearing a nasal cannula attached to a portable oxygen tank with a setting of three liter per minute. The oxygen tubing was observed with a label dated 4/23/26. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 5/14/26. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's Order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from significant medication errors. * Resident 1 received more than the recommended dose of insulin (medication to lower blood sugar levels) as order by the physician. This failure posed the risk for hypoglycemia (a condition characterized by abnormally low blood sugar) and other health complications for Resident 1.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Insulin Administration revised 3/2025 showed the type of insulin, dosage requirements, strength, and method of administration are verified with the order on the medication sheet and the physician's order before administration. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 5/14/26. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 4/14/26, for HumaLog injection solution 100 unit/ml (Insulin Lispro-a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours of admission for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1's baseline care plan showed treatment and interventions related to mycotic nails. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 not to receive the necessary treatment and services to meet the individualized care needs. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered (undated) showed a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan:a. includes measurable objectives and timeframes;b. describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicablephysical, mental, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety guidelines were followed for the protection of 130 residents who received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. Cleaning cloths were not stored properly in the sanitizing solution. 2. The thawing process for meat was not followed. 3. Hair restraints were not worn properly. 4. The manual dishwashing procedure was not followed. 5. Frozen food was not stored properly. 6. Dry food was stored properly. 7. Two of two ice/water dispensers did not have an air gap. These failures posed the risk for food borne illnesses in 130 residents who received food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Diet Order Tally Report dated 1/6/26, showed 130 residents received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. According to the USDA Food Code 2022 Section 3-304.14 Wiping Cloths, Use Limitation (B) (1) showed, Cloths in-use for wiping counter and other equipment surfaces shall be:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of one final sampled resident (Resident 17) reviewed for physical restraint was informed of the use of the restraint. * The facility failed to ensure the informed consent was obtained prior to the use of the bed and chair alarms for Resident 17. This failure had the potential for Resident 17 not to be informed of the potential risks and benefits of the restraints.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Use of Restraints revised 1/2025 showed under the Policy Interpretation and Implementation section, restraints shall only be used upon the written order of a physician and after obtaining consent from the resident and/or representative. The order shall include the following: the specific reason for the restraint (as it relates to the resident's medical symptom), how the restraint will be used to benefit the resident's medical symptom, and the type of restraint, and period of time for the use of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 28 final sampled residents (Resident 130) was assessed to self-administer medications. * Resident 130 had medications on the resident's bedside table. Resident 130 was not assessed to self-administer the medications. This failure had the potential to negatively impact on the resident physiological well-being and could administer the medication inaccurately.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Self-Administration of Medications revised February 2021 showed the residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. The IDT assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is safe and clinically appropriate for the resident. The policy also showed that any medications found at the bedside that are not authorized for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide information regarding the rights to formulate the advance directives to three of five final sampled residents (Residents 13, 83, and 130) reviewed for the advance directives. * The facility failed to ensure the advanced directive copy of Resident 13 was available in the resident's medical records. * The facility failed to ensure the formulation of the advance directive for Resident 83 was followed up. * The facility failed to ensure the advance directive copy for Resident 130 was available in the medical records. These failures had the potential for the residents' wishes related to the provision of medical treatment and services to not be followed if the residents were unable to make medical decisions for themselves.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Advance Directives revised September 2022 showed prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director or designee inquires of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of one final sampled resident (Resident 17) reviewed for physical restraint was free from unnecessary restraints. * The facility failed to assess the need for the use of the wheelchair alarm, determine least restrictive interventions before physical restraints were utilized, and develop and implement interventions to prevent and address any risks related to the use of the restraints for Resident 17. These failures had the potential for increased risk of physical harm and negative potential outcome to the resident. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Use of Restraints revised and reviewed 1/2025 showed:- Restraints shall only be used for the safety and well-being of the resident(s) and only after other alternatives have been tried unsuccessfully;- Restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptom(s) and never for discipline or staff convenience, or for the prevention of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one final sampled resident (Resident 83) reviewed for psychotropic medication use was free from the unnecessary psychotropic drugs. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 83's monthly behavior summary was accurately monitored and recorded for the use of mirtazapine (antidepressant) medication. This failure had the potential to place the residents at risk of receiving unnecessary medications and increased risk of serious medication adverse reactions.Findings: Medical record review for Resident 83 was initiated on 1/6/26. Resident 83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 83's Order Summary Report dated 1/7/26, showed the following physician's order:- dated 5/30/25, to administer mirtazapine tablet 7.5 mg, one tablet by mouth at bedtime for depression manifested by poor oral intake less than 50%.- dated 9/26/25, to monitor behavior episodes of depression (for the use of mirtazapine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review the facility failed to timely notify and accurately sent the Notification of Proposed Transfer/Discharge to the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes) when two of three sampled residents (Residents 156 and 158) reviewed for closed records. * The facility failed to ensure notification of proposed transfer was sent to the Ombudsman timely for Resident 156. * The facility failed to ensure the Notice of Proposed Transfer was accurately sent to the Ombudsman for Resident 158. These failures had the potential for the Ombudsman not to be able to advocate for the residents in protecting their rights from inappropriate transfer and discharge.Findings: Review of facility's P&P titled Transfer or Discharge Notices revised 3/2025 showed the residents (or resident representatives) are notified of an impending transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 67 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care to reflect the individual care needs for one of 28 final sampled residents (Resident 20). * The facility failed to develop a care plan problem to address Resident 20's nephrostomy tubes (a thin catheter inserted through the back into the kidney to drain urine directly into a bag, bypassing a blockage or leak in the urinary tract). This failure posed the risk of not providing appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to this resident. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, Development, Implementation & Revision revised January 2025 showed the comprehensive, person-centered care plan:a. includes measurable objectives and timeframes.b. describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.c. includes the resident's stated goals upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain the highest physical well-being for two of 28 final sampled residents (Residents 9 and 31). * The facility failed to initiate a change of condition, notify the physician and resident representative when Resident 9 was involved in an allegation of abuse. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 31 was continuously monitored when the resident had dysuria (painful or difficult urination) and antibiotic use. These failures had the potential for the residents not to receive the appropriate care and monitoring to prevent the development of complications and/or delayed medical treatments.Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation – Reporting and Investigating revised 1/2025 showed all reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of three final sampled residents (Resident 20) nephrostomy tube (a small tube inserted through the back into the kidney to drain urine when the normal urinary pathway is blocked). * The facility failed to ensure a physician's order was obtained for the care and monitoring of nephrostomy tube for Resident 20. This failure had the potential for the risk of infection and affected the well-being of the residents. Findings: On 1/5/26 at 1025 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, an observation and concurrent interview for Resident 20 was conducted. Resident 20 was sitting in bed and observed with a leg drainage bag attached to both thighs. Resident 20 stated the drainage was from his kidneys. Resident 20 further stated his drainage bag sometimes had blood. Medical record review for Resident 20 was initiated on 1/8/26. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate GT care and services were provided for one of two final sampled residents (Resident 101) reviewed for GT. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 101's enteral formula bottle was labeled with the correct name of the resident. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Enteral Nutrition dated January 2025 showed adequate nutritional support through enteral nutrition is provided to residents as ordered. The nurses confirm the physician's order for enteral nutrition is complete before administration. During the initial tour on 1/5/26 at 1027 hours, Resident 101 was observed in bed with the GT feeding. The feeding was Glucerna 1.5 cal (enteral feeding formula) and it was infusing via GT feeding machine at 45 ml per hour. The enteral formula bottle was labeled with different name of a resident. LVN 6 was summoned to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the recommendation from Dialysis Center and fluid restriction were followed for two of three final sampled residents (Residents 10 and 113) reviewed for dialysis. * The facility failed to ensure the physician's order for 1500 ml of fluid restriction was followed and carried out accordingly for Resident 10. * The facility failed to follow up on a dialysis recommendation to check Resident 113 for C-diff (a harmful bacterium causing diarrhea and colitis often triggered by antibiotic use that disrupts gut bacteria). These failures had the potential of not identifying potential negative outcomes for the residents on dialysis.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care of Residents on Hemodialysis, Coordination of Care, Evaluation and Communication, revised 1/2025 showed the Dialysis Center, by telephone or in writing, will notify the facility of the following: - any medication given…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 20 kitchen staff (Dietary Aide 3) was competent in preforming the task in the food and nutrition department. * The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide 3 was competent in the manual dishwashing procedure. This failure posed the risk for the dishes, pots, and pans used to cook the residents' food to not be cleaned and sanitized properly. Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Dietary Aide Competency Checklist signed by Dietary Aide 3 and the DSS on 10/9/25, showed Dietary Aide 3 was competent in washing and cleaning the utensils as directed and performed dishwashing/cleaning procedures. Review of the facility's document titled Dietary In-Service, Topic: Cleaning and Sanitizing Dishes, Utensils, Pots and Pans dated 11/10/25, showed Dietary Aide 3 was in attendance. Review of the facility's P&P titled 3-Compartment Procedure for Manual Dishwashing dated 2023 showed the following:Step 2: Rinse, scrape, or soak all items before washing. Use a brush,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the menu and recipes were followed. * The facility failed to ensure 75 of 75 residents on regular diets were served the correct portion size for the entree of the lunch meal. * The facility failed to ensure the puree broccoli recipe was followed for 19 of 19 residents on the puree diet. These failures posed the risk for 75 residents on regular diets and 19 residents on puree diets to not meet their nutritional needs.Findings: 1. Review of facility's document titled Cooks Spreadsheet dated 1/5/26, showed the regular diet would serve four ounces of the Southern style patty for the regular sized portions and three ounces for small sized portions. On 1/5/26 at 0930 hours, during the initial tour of the kitchen with the DSS, a lunch preparation observation and concurrent interview was conducted with [NAME] 1. [NAME] 1 was observed portioning the ground beef for the Southern style patty. [NAME] 1 stated he was using a two-ounce scoop to form the patties. [NAME] 1 stated the portion sizes for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure a vegetarian meal substitute was served for two nonsampled residents (Residents 94 and 163) who were on vegetarian preference diet. * The facility failed to ensure Residents 94 and 163 received a vegetarian meal substitute equivalent in nutritive value to the main entree served. This failure posed the risk for the residents' nutritional needs, specifically protein needs to not be met.Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Cooks Spreadsheet dated 1/6/26, showed Regular diets were to receive three ounces of pork with pear sauce. Review of the nutritional information provided by the facility for the pork during lunch on 1/6/26, showed the three ounces would provide 15.75 grams of protein. Review of the nutritional information provided by the facility for the tofu during lunch on 1/6/26, for the vegetarian lunch meal alternate, showed the three ounces would provide nine grams of protein. On 1/6/26 at 1000 hours, an interview was conducted with the DSS. The DSS stated the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Base on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the proper food texture was followed for 12 of 12 residents on an IDDSI Level 6 diet (Soft and Bite-Sized diet, for people who can chew but need food that's soft, tender, moist, and cut into small pieces (about 1.5cm x 1.5cm for adults) that mash easily with a fork, requiring chewing before swallowing). * The facility failed to ensure the meat, vegetables, and bread were properly prepared for the 12 residents on IDDSI Level 6 diet. This failure posed the risk for the 12 residents with swallowing and/or chewing difficulties on mechanically altered diets to not receive the diet texture as ordered by the physician.Findings: Review of the professional reference International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) a level 6 diet, Soft and Bite-Sized diet should have 'bite-sized' pieces no larger than 1.5 cm equivalent to half an inch. The food must be soft, tender and moist throughout but with no separate thin liquid. According to the IDDSI Audit Tool for the Soft and Bite-Sized diet,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary adaptive equipment was provided for one of 28 final sampled resident (Resident 11). * The facility failed to provide Resident 11 with a plate guard as per the physician's order. This failure had the potential for Resident 11 not being able to consume his food and drinks without the necessary assistive device.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Adaptive Equipment Policy dated January 2025 showed the provision of the supplies and equipment to support self-care of the residents. Restorative and supportive care includes the assessment of self-feeding skills, providing adaptive devices, and retraining program based on resident needs and capabilities. On 1/5/26 at 1238 hours, an observation of Resident 11 and concurrent interview was conducted with LVN 5 at the bedside. Resident 11 was observed in bed eating his food from the food tray using his right hand. Resident 11's right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment was complete. * The facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment included the active involvement of the required individuals in developing the Facility Assessment, plan to maximize recruitment and retention of direct care staff, and a contingency plan for staffing needs. This failures had the potential to not meet the residents' care needs if the assessed population's needs and resources were not comprehensively identified and addressed.Findings: According to the CMS QSO-24-13-NH dated 6/18/24, with an implementation date of 8/8/24, CMS had issued a revised guidance for long-term care facility assessment requirement. The Facility Assessment should address and included the active involvement of the direct care staff in developing the Facility Assessment. Also included the staffing resources necessary to care for the residents, including the weekends; a plan to maximize recruitment and retention of direct…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility documents review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for five of 28 final sampled residents (Residents 13, 15, 87, 99, and 113). * The facility failed to ensure the section D of the POLST was completed for Resident 15, 87, and 99. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 113's blood pressure access site was accurately documented in the resident's medical record. * The facility failed to document the correct site of the blood pressure reading for Resident 13 who had an AVF in the right upper arm. These failures had the potential for the residents' care needs not being met as their medical information was inaccurateFindings: Review of facility's P&P titled Charting and Documentation review dated 1/2025 showed the documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opiniated or speculative), complete and accurate. 1. Medical record review for Resident 15 was initiated on 1/6/26. Resident 15 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the facility had the contract to provide the necessary care for one of two final sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for hospice services. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2 had an election of hospice benefit contract between the facility and hospice provider. This failure posed a risk of delayed communication and the provision of hospice care between the hospice provider and the facility.Findings: Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 1/5/26. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 12/24/25, to admit Resident 2 to the facility under Hospice Provider A, under routine level of care. Review of the Resident 2's Election of Hospice Benefit Contract dated 12/24/25, showed the signed contract for hospice services was between Facility A and Hospice Provider A. On 1/8/26 at 1018 hours, an interview and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the infection control program and practices to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections. * The two washing machines used for residents were not maintained to ensure cleanliness and free from potential contamination. * The facility failed to ensure CNA 3 donned the appropriate PPE when providing care to Resident 40 on EBP. These failures had the potential for the spread of infection in the facility.Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Laundry Washing Machine Policy dated 1/2025, under the Policy Interpretation and Implementation sections showed for routine cleaning, washing machines shall be cleaned daily at minimum and as needed, and staff will clean and disinfect door seals, gaskets, detergent dispensers, control panels and handles. On 1/6/26 at 1528 hours, a laundry room inspection was conducted with the Maintenance Director, Maintenance Assistant, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents' (Resident 3) medical record was accurate and complete. * The facility failed to ensure the documentation for monitoring Resident 3's condition for 72 hours each shift was completed after the resident's fall incident. This failure posed the risk for changes in Resident 3's health condition to go undetected and possibly delay necessary care and treatment. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Change of Condition Notification dated 2001 showed the nurse will record in the resident's medical record information relative to changes in the resident's medical/mental condition or status. Medical record review for Resident 3 was initiated on 4/10/25. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 3's H&P examination dated 8/24/24, showed Resident 3 had no capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 3's eINTERACT Change in Condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement their abuse P&P for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act when the facility failed to report in a timely manner an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse to the local State and Federal agencies for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for the abuse allegation going unreported and uninvestigated. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation – Reporting and Investigating dated 2001 showed all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to the local State, and Federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by the facility management. The suspicion of abuse must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. The abuse must…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement their abuse P&P related to investigation of the physical abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure posed the risk for the potential abuse to remain unidentified and for the residents to go unprotected. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation – Reporting and Investigation dated 2001 showed any incident or allegation of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are initiated and thoroughly investigated by the administrator. The staff member assigned to gather the facts will at a minimum reviews the documentation and evidence, reviews the resident's medical record to determine the resident's physical and cognitive status at the time of the incident and since the incident, interview the person(s) reporting the incident, interview any witnesses to the incident, interview staff members (on all shifts) who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the safe respiratory care to meet the needs for eight of eight final sampled residents (Residents 5, 43, 57, 63, 68, 110, 595, and 793) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 72) reviewed for respiratory care * The facility failed to ensure Resident 793's physician's order for the use of CPAP machine was followed up with and failed to ensure Resident 793 was utilizing the CPAP machine as ordered by the physician. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident 793's nasal cannula was stored in a sanitary manner. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 5's nasal cannula was changed as per the facility procedures and Resident 5's nebulizer mask storage bag was labeled per the facility policy. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 57's CPAP and nebulizer mask were stored in a sanitary manner when not in use. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 72's nebulizer mask was stored in a sanitary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed when: * The pureed fresh green salad with dressing was not served to 20 residents who were on pureed diets. * Resident 46's lunch tray was observed with pureed food in accordance with the menu, except the fresh green salad with dressing was missing from the lunch tray. Additionally, Resident 46's lunch tray did not contain V8 juice puree. * Resident 444's lunch tray was observed with pureed food in accordance with the menu, except the fresh green salad with dressing was missing from the lunch tray. These failures had the potential to place 20 residents on pureed diets at risk of not receiving the menu as planned. Findings: Review of the facility's documented showed 20 residents received pureed diets prepared in the facility's kitchen. 1. Review of the facility's document titled Fall Menus, Week 2, Tuesday showed a pureed diet included: pureed lemon chicken piccata, pureed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed when: * The facility failed to ensure the expired food items in the kitchen were discarded. A bin containing thawed packages of mechanically separated turkey had a use-by date of 11/3/24, and a bin containing thawed chicken had a use-by date of 11/3/24, were seen in the kitchen refrigerator. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils were clean, free of food particles, and not worn out. These failures posed the risk for food borne illnesses in highly susceptible resident population of 132 facility residents who received food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's document showed 132 of 141 residents received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. On 11/4/24 at 0757 hours, two bins containing thawed poultry were observed on the bottom shelf of the walk-in refrigerator. One bin contained packages of mechanically separated turkey was labeled with a thaw date of 11/2/24, and a use-by date of 11/3/24. The other bin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for one of 30 final sampled resident (Resident 394) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 132). This failure had the potential for Residents 132 and 394 not receiving care timely. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Answering the Call light dated 10/2010 showed when the resident is in bed or confine to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. 1. Medical record review for Resident 394 was initiated on 11/4/24. Resident 394 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. On 11/4/24 at 0815 hours, Resident 394 was awake with his call light on the floor. Resident 394 stated he could not locate his call light to call for the nurse. Resident 394 stated he needed help to change his diaper because his diaper was wet. On 11/4/24 at 0825 hour, CNA 7 was summoned to the room. CNA 7 acknowledged the call light was on the floor and stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of two final sampled residents (Resident 76) who was readmitted to the facility had a Level 1 PASARR screening. This failure had the potential of not providing the residents screened for mental illness or intellectual disabilities with additional resources if needed. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled PASARR revised 3/2019 showed all individuals are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process. a. The facility verifies with the acute care hospital if a Level I PASARR screen for potential admissions and readmissions, regardless soft payer source, to determine if the individual meets the criteria for a MD, ID or RD. b. Before a resident can be transferred from an acute care hospital, they must undergo a PASARR Level I screening. This initial screening is designated to identify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive person-centered care plans were developed and implemented for five of 30 final sampled residents (Residents 34, 43, 63, 76, and 743) as evidence by the following: * The facility failed to develop and implement an EBP care plan for Resident 34. * The facility failed to develop and implement an oxygen care plan for Resident 63. * The facility failed to develop and implement a LAL mattress for Resident 76. * The facility failed to develop and implement an EBP care plan for Resident 743. * Resident 43's care plan for the use of oxygen showed to administer continuous oxygen at a rate of 2 liters per minute, however, the nursing staff failed to implement the care plan, as evidenced by having administered continuous oxygen therapy to Resident 43 at a rate of 1.5 liters per minute. These failures had the potential of not providing residents with person-centered plan of care. Findings: Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of one final sampled resident (Resident 60) who needed a communication board (pre-printed board that has pictures, numbers, and user defined images that allows a resident to point or indicate on the board what he/she wants communicated) to communicate the needs was provided with the communication board in the resident's language to communicate care needs to the facility staff. This failure had the potential to result in a delay of care services and needs for Resident 60. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Communication Barriers and Communication Boards undated showed the facility will make arrangement for interpreters and/or alternate means of communication such as communication boards with pictures, common basic words, sign language, Braille, etc., to enhance communication between the resident and staff. Medical record review for Resident 60 was initiated on 11/5/24. Resident 60 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure three of three final sampled residents (Residents 43, 62, and 76) with high risk for skin breakdown were provided the necessary care and services as evidence by the following: * The facility failed to ensure Resident 76's LAL mattress setting was not appropriate to the resident's weight. * The facility failed to ensure the use of LAL mattress with specific direction for settings for Residents 43 and 62. These failures had the potential for the residents not to receive the appropriate care and services to promote skin healing. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Beds, Special - Low Air Loss Therapy, undated, showed it is the policy of this facility to utilize low air loss therapy under the direction of a physician's order. Facility staff working directly with the low air loss therapy unit will have training in its use by a company representative or a trained facility staff member. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the disposed narcotic count sheets were signed by two licensed nurses. This failure had the potential for medication diversion (the illegal use or distribution of a prescription medication that was not originally intended by the prescriber). Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Discarding and Destroying Controlled/ Non-Controlled Medications revised 5/2024 showed the following: -Medications that cannot be returned to the dispensing pharmacy (such as non-unit dose medications, medications refused by the resident, and/or medications left by residents upon discharge) are disposed of in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations governing management of non-hazardous pharmaceuticals, hazardous waste and controlled substances; and -Unless otherwise prohibited under applicable federal or state laws, individual resident medications supposed in sealed unopened containers may be returned to the issuing pharmacy for disposition provided that all such…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of 30 final sampled residents (Residents 29 and 38) were free from the unnecessary drugs. * Resident 29 received amitriptyline (antidepressant medication) and bupropion hydrochloride (antidepressant and smoking cessation); however, the facility failed to identify what target behaviors to monitor and did not monitor the episodes of behaviors for two antidepressant medications. * The facility failed to document specific behaviors prior to prescribing Zoloft (antidepressant) and implement non-pharmacological interventions for Resident 38. These failures had the potential for Residents 29 and 38 to have adverse complications from the medication. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychotropic/Antidepressant Medication Use dated 2021 showed under the section Psychotropic Medication Management, Psychotropic medication management for the resident will involve the facility interdisciplinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medication rate was less than 5%. The facility's medication error rate was 12%. * LVN 2 failed to administer Systane (eye drops, use for dry eyes) for Resident 22 as per the facility's P&P. * LVN 4 failed to check Resident 12's bowel pattern for loose stool prior to administering docusate sodium (stool softener). * LVN 1 failed to check Resident 97's bowel pattern for loose stool prior to administering docusate sodium. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised May 2024 showed the medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Eye Drops Administration Procedure undated showed ophthalmic solutions are administered into and around the eye in a safe and accurate manner. Release the eyelid and instruct the resident to close the eye for one or two minutes. On 11/6/24 at 0930 hours, a medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure for the safe storage of the medications and supplies. * The Central Supply Room was observed to contain expired supplies and medications along with other supplies without a manufacturing or expiration date. * Medication Cart D was observed to contain multiple expired antifungal cream tubes. * Medication Cart C was observed to contain a bottle of aspirin 81 mg without an expiration date and medication for a discharged resident. * An antifungal cream was kept at the bedside for one final sampled resident (Resident 12). *The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart E was not left unlocked and unattended. * For Resident 82, facility failed to ensure A&D ointments (barrier cream/ointment) were not kept at Resident 82's bedside. * The facility failed to dispose the discontinue medication for Residents who had been discharged for three nonsampled resident (Residents 54, 395, and 396). * The facility failed to stored medication in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two nonsampled residents (Residents 14 and 132) observed during the dining observation received the appropriate mechanically altered diets (the texture of the diet is altered) as ordered by the physician. * Resident 132 was not served the milk and coffee as ordered. * Resident 14 was not served the correct diet as ordered. This failure posed the risk of aspiration (inhalation of a foreign object into the airway and/or lungs) and resident's nutritional needs not being met. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Food and Nutrition Services revised 10/2017 showed the food and nutrition services staff will inspect food trays to ensure that the correct meal is provided to each resident, the food appears palatable and attractive, and it is served at a safe and appetizing temperature. 1. On 11/4/24 at 1157 hours, a meal cart was observed to be dropped off by the kitchen staff. LVN 7 was observed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one nonsampled residents (Resident 53) was provided with an assistive eating device during mealtimes. This failure had the potential to impact Resident 53's nutritional status. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Self-Feeding Devices dated 2023 showed it is the policy of the facility that residents will receive self-feeding devices to maintain or improve their ability to eat or drink independently. Residents needing devices will receive them with each meal or snack, on their meal trays. Tray cards and diet profile will record which device is needed. On 11/4/24 at 1225 hours, a lunch observation was conducted in Resident 53's room. Resident 53 was observed feeding himself only using his right hand. Resident 53 was observed carefully scooping the food using regular utensils. There were no adaptive devices observed. Review of Resident 53's meal ticket failed to show the use of built-up utensils.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the P&P regarding outside food for residents was followed. * The facility failed to ensure the facility staff responsible for handling food brought for the residents from the outside and family/visitors who brought food for residents from the outside were educated on safe food handling procedures. This failure posed the risk for food borne illness in residents who consume food from outside sources. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Foods Brought by Family/Visitors revised 3/2022 showed the following: - Family/visitors are asked to prepare and transport food using safe food handling practices, including safe cooling and reheating processes, holding temperatures, preventing cross-contamination with raw and undercooked foods, and hand hygiene. - Safe food handling practices are explained to family/visitors in a language and format they understand. On 11/6/24 at 1411 hours, an interview was conducted with CNA 2. CNA 2 was asked what her role was when the residents had food brought in from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the infection control was maintained as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure Residents 34 and 743 with indwelling urinary catheters and midline IV (intravenous) catheter were placed on EBP as per the facility's P&P. * The facility failed to conduct surveillance of infections for the residents who showed signs and symptoms of infection but were not on antimicrobials. * The facility failed to identity organisms on the surveillance line listing. * Resident 38's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was on the floor and a urinal with scant amount of yellow urine was observed hanging from the trash can adjacent to Resident 38's bed. These failures put the residents a risk for increased risk of infection and transmissions of diseases. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions revised 3/2024, showed the purpose of this policy is to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure six of six final sampled residents (Residents 38, 60, 76, 443, 596, and 743) reviewed for pneumococcal vaccinations were educated and offered the pneumococcal vaccination as evidenced by: * The facility failed to offer the educational materials of the risks and benefits for the pneumococcal vaccines to Residents 60, 76, 443, 596, and 743 as per the facility's P&P. * The facility failed to offer Resident 38's responsible party the PPSV 23 (pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine) vaccine. These failures put the residents at risk for infection and transmission of pneumococcal infections. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Pneumococcal Vaccine revised on 3/2024 showed all residents are offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. Prior to or upon admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, are offered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure six of six final sampled residents (Residents 38, 60, 76, 443, 596, and 743) reviewed for COVID-19 vaccinations were educated and offered the COVID-19 vaccination as evidenced by: * The facility failed to offer the educational materials of the risks and benefits for the COVID-19 vaccines to Residents 60, 76, 443, 596, and 743 as per the facility's P&P. * The facility failed to offer Resident 38's responsible party the seasonal COVID-19 vaccine. These failures put the residents at risk for increased risk of infection and transmission of COVID-19. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Vaccination of Residents revised on 11/2024 showed each resident is offered the COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident is fully vaccinated. Residents who are eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine are strongly encouraged to do so. COVID-19 vaccine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to prevent the development or worsening of pressure injuries for two of two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2). * The facility failed to assess Resident 1's skin when readmitted to the facility and failed to develop a care plan to address Resident 1's coccyx wound. * The facility failed to revise Resident 2's care plan to address Resident 2's Stage 3 pressure injury and failed to ensure Resident 2 received his wound treatment with his own wound medication supply. These failures had the potential for Residents 1 and 2 not to receive the appropriate care and services to promote healing of the pressure injury. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled admission Notes (undated) showed should a resident be discharged from and readmitted to the facility, the new admission data must be recorded. Review of the facility's P&P titled Guidelines for Charting and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement their P&P to ensure the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act when the facility staff failed to immediately report an abuse allegation involving a CNA to the facility's Administrator or DON for one of two residents reviewed for abuse (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for not protecting the resident from abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Patient Protection Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation Prevention dated October 2021 showed the following: - Employees are educated upon hired and annually on the abuse prevention program, including the immediate reporting of any suspicious of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, misappropriation or crime involving a resident. - Resident protection actions include immediately remove the resident from contact with the alleged abuser during the investigation. If the incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was administered the parenteral fluids in accordance with the physician's order. * Resident 1's IV antibiotics was held without a physician's order. This posed the risk of Resident 1 receiving ineffective treatment. Findings: According to the National Institute of Health's study titled Antibiotics Non-adherence and its Associated Factors .dated 4/19/22, non-adherence to antibiotics has a considerable impact on treatment outcome. Adherent patients got three times the good treatment outcome as non-adherent patients and may result in microbial resistance, which reduces the efficacy of antimicrobials in the prevention and treatment of microbial infections . Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated 12/6/23. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's Radiology Results Report dated 10/31/23, showed there was a concern for pneumonia in the clinical setting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility was made aware Resident 1 allegedsomeone hit him; however, they failed to conduct an investigation. This failure put Resident 1 at risk of abuse. Findings: Review of the facility ' s P&P titled Patient Protection: Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation Prevention dated 10/2021 showed any allegation of abuse requires an investigation. The facility must have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated and must prevent further potential abuse while the investigation is in progress. On 9/13/23 at 0736 hours, CDPH, L&C Program received a complaint alleging Resident 1 was hit in the facility. Review of Resident 1 ' s medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the physician ' s note dated 7/24/23, showed the resident was admitted to the facility due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care with Hospice A for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 1). * Resident 1 experienced a fall in the facility, and neither Family Member 1 nor Resident 1 ' s physician was notified in a timely manner. This failure had the risk of a delay in necessary care and services for Resident 1. Findings: Review of the facility ' s P&P titled Falls Practice Guide dated 12/2011 showed: - After a fall, upon the completion of the evaluation, the physician is notified and orders are documented, noted and implemented, as indicated. The family and responsible party is notified of the fall event or change in fall risk factors and the patient ' s current condition. The patient ' s condition, response to interventions and subsequent care provided is documented in the patient ' s clinical record. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 9/15/23. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen as evidenced by the following: * The facility failed to ensure three of three ice machines were maintained in a sanitary condition. * The facility failed to ensure thawed meat was dated when the thawing process was started. * The facility failed to ensure safe storage of food items. * The facility failed to ensure food was covered during delivery to the residents. * The facility failed to ensure proper washing of produce. * The facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in a sanitary condition. * The facility failed to ensure food preparation equipment was air dried. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness for residents who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the CMS 672 titled Resident Census and Conditions of Residents dated 6/8/22 and signed by the DON, showed 127 of the 131 residents received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. According to the USDA Food Code 2017, Section 4-601.11…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-13 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the dish machine was repaired in a timely manner to ensure the dish machine water temperature reached a minimum of 160 degrees Fahrenheit (F). This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illness for residents using dishes that were not properly sanitized. Findings: According to the USFDA Food Code 2017 Annex 3, Equipment 4-501.11 Good Repair and Proper Adjustment, proper maintenance of equipment to manufacturer specifications helps ensure that it will continue to operate as designed. Failure to properly maintain equipment could lead to violations of the associated requirements of the Code that place the health of the consumer at risk. 4-302.13 Temperature Measuring Devices, Manual Ware washing. Water temperature is critical to sanitization in ware washing operations. This is particularly true if the sanitizer being used is hot water.A temperature measuring device is essential to monitor manual ware washing and ensure sanitization. Effective mechanical hot water sanitization occurs when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, facility P&P review, and prescribing highlights review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' drugs and biologicals were stored in a safe manner and labeled properly. * Eye drops, inhalers, nebulizer inhalation, and nasal spray were opened and not labeled. This failure posed to potentially expose the residents to the expired medications with questionable potency and efficacy. * The facility failed to ensure the medication storage rooms were accessible only to the licensed nursing personnel. The Maintenance Director was able to access Medication room [ROOM NUMBER]. This had the potential for unauthorized persons to access the medications. * Resident 31 had the Wixela inhaler (a bronchodilator medication, used to relax the muscles in the airways and increases air flow to the lungs) at the bedside. Resident 31 did not have a physician's order to keep medications at her bedside. This had the potential for unauthorized persons to access the medication.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-13 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure two of two RDs (RDs 1 and 2) were competent in their job duties when: * RD 1 failed to address a dish machine failure as per the facility P&P and federal food code standards. This failure caused an equipment failure to not be addressed in a timely manner which could lead to residents' dishware to not be sanitized. *RD 2 failed to address an unplanned severe weight loss of 25 pounds (lbs.), 12 % in a 28-day time frame for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 16) with the IDT members and implement interventions. In addition, RD 2 failed to update the care plan for Resident 16 to reflect the unplanned severe weight loss. These failures posed the risk for the unplanned severe weight loss to go unaddressed which could lead to further medical complications. Findings: 1. According to the USFDA Food Code 2017 Annex 3, Equipment 4-501.11 Good Repair and Proper Adjustment, proper maintenance of equipment to manufacturer specifications helps ensure that it will continue to operate as designed. Failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 26 final sampled residents (Resident 16) whose unplanned severe weight loss of 25 pounds was not care planned. This failure had the potential for Resident 16 to have compromised nutritional status and to not receive necessary care and services. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 16 was initiated on 6/9/22. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 16's history and physical examination dated 2/14/22, showed Resident 16 had diagnoses which included diabetes (a chronic, metabolic disease characterized by elevated levels of blood sugar), chronic kidney disease stage III (decreased kidney function), and peripheral vascular disease (blood circulation disorder that causes the blood vessels outside of your heart and brain to narrow, block, or spasm). Review of Resident 16's Weights and Vitals Summary dated 6/9/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to revise or update the plans of care for two of 26 final sampled residents (Residents 50 and 51). This failure had the potential for the residents to not receive appropriate care and interventions. * Resident 51's plan of care was not updated to reflect the current hospice provider and discontinuation of peripheral IV. * Resident 50's plan of care was not revised when the lorazepam (a medication used to treat anxiety) was discontinued. Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 51 was initiated on 6/7/22. Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. a. Review of Resident 51's Medication Review Report showed an order dated 5/20/22, to admit to the facility for hospices services provided by Hospice A. However, review of Resident 51's plan of care showed the following care plan problems for care provided by Hospice B dated 5/23/22: - ADL (activities of daily living) self care deficit related to physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one nonsampled resident (Resident 68). * LVN 6 failed to administer the correct dose of Refresh (an eye drop lubricant and moisturizes the eyes) to Resident 68 as ordered by the physician. This failure posed the risk for the resident to not receive the therapeutic benefits. Findings: The facility's P&P titled Medication and Treatment Administration Guidelines updated 03/2018 showed medications are administered in accordance with standards of practice and state specific and federal guidelines. On 6/8/22 at 0801 hours, a medication administration observation was conducted with LVN 6. LVN 6 prepared and administered Refresh lubricant eye drops one drop to both eyes for Resident 68. Review of Resident 68's medical record was initiated on 6/8/22. Resident 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 68's Order Summary Report showed an order dated 12/13/21, for Refresh…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to effectively assess and identify the potential source of one of 26 final sampled residents (Resident 16)'unplanned severe weight loss and implement the necessary interventions as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure the IDT (a group of professionals who work together to provide the greatest benefit for the resident) analyzed and implemented the necessary interventions to address Resident 16's unplanned severe weight loss of 25 lbs which was equivalent to 12% in 28 days; * The facility did not notify the physician of Resident 16's unplanned severe weight loss of 25 lbs, 12% between 10/7/21 and 11/4/21. These failures had the potential to result in the lack of implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of the effectiveness of nutritional interventions and related outcomes, and increase the potential for further weight loss and/or nutritional decline. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Weight Measurement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the respiratory care in accordance with the physician's order for two of 26 final sampled residents (Residents 447 and 597). The oxygen was not administered as ordered for Residents 447 and 597. This posed the risk for complications related to respiratory treatment. Findings: On 6/8/22 at 0913 hours, Resident 447 was observed receiving oxygen at 4 LPM via nasal cannula. Review of Resident 447's medical record was initiated on 6/7/22. Resident 447 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 447's H&P examination dated 6/6/22, showed Resident 447 had a diagnosis of COPD. Review of Resident 447's Medication Review Report showed an order dated 6/8/22, to administer oxygen at 2 LPM via nasal cannula every shift for COPD. Review of Resident 447's plan of care showed a care plan problem dated 6/8/22, addressing the risk for respiratory impairment related to shortness of breath. Care plan interventions included to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the pharmaceutical services to one nonsampled resident (Resident 699) to assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of the resident. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 699's oxycodone tablets were administered as ordered by the physician. Resident 699 was given oxycodone 15 mg (short acting narcotic pain reliever, ordered for moderate to severe pain) instead of the routine oxycodone 15 mg ER (extended release-long-acting narcotic pain reliever) tablet. This failure had the potential of negatively impacting Resident 699's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication and Treatment Administration Guidelines updated 3/2018 showed in part, medications are administered in accordance with the standards of practice. Medication are administered in accordance with following rights of medication administration: right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 25 final sampled residents (Resident 31) was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs (any drug that affects brain activity). * The facility failed to ensure an informed consent was obtained when sertraline (antidepressant) medication for Resident 31. In addition, the facility failed to monitor the behavior related to the use of sertraline. These failures posed the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Behavior Management Guidelines dated 3/2022 showed the use of psychoactive medications should be utilized only as is necessary as demonstrated by the patient's behavior. As behaviors decrease, re-evaluation of the use of the medications should occur. Patients, families/ responsible parties are educated regarding risks/ benefits of psychoactive medications prior to the first dose being administered. If required by the specific state, signed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-13 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff had the appropriate skill set to safely perform the daily operations of the Food and Nutrition Services Department when: * FSW 1 was unable to provide the correct dish machine water temperatures. In addition, FSW 1 was not able to demonstrate how to test the sanitizing solution used for the dish machine. This failure had the potential for unsafe food practices which may lead to food borne illness in a highly susceptible population of 124 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the CMS 672 titled Resident Census and Conditions of Residents dated 6/8/22 and signed by the DON, showed 127 of the 131 residents received food prepared in the kitchen. Review of the facility's P&P titled Dishwasher Operation - Failure dated 11/2020 showed in part, whenever dishwasher temperatures .are not at the dishwasher manufacturer's recommended levels, the dishwashing process is stopped immediately and not restarted until the problem is corrected.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review and facility's P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed and the residents' nutritional needs were met when: * The puree recipe for glazed ham was not followed for 11 residents who received a puree diet. * The facility failed to follow the menu for the renal CCHO diet (a diet for residents with diabetes and end stage kidney disease). * The facility failed to provide a vegetarian menu for Resident 20. These failures had the potential for residents receiving puree, renal or vegetarian diets to not have their nutritional needs met which may lead to nutritional related health complications. Findings: 1. According to the facility's P&P titled Consistency Modified Foods- level 14 pureed dated 1/2020 showed shaped pureed meats/entrees are used when available. The cook is directed to follow instruction on the product package. If not available, the regular item is pureed following the recipe. Review of the facility's document titled Maple Glazed Ham dated 10/28/20, showed to blend maple syrup, brown sugar,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's food preferences were followed for one of 26 final sampled residents (Resident 20). This failure caused the resident to receive foods she did not prefer. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Food Preferences dated 11/2020 showed the residents may be visited by the food services, director, dietetics professional, registered dietitian or designee on admission, during regular meal rounds or as needed to determine food preferences. This information is entered into dietary eKardex. Dislikes and allergies/ sensitivities print on the tray card for reference during meal service. It is recommended that meal preferences be checked on a routine basis and updated. Likes and dislikes may change throughout the patient's stay. On 6/7/22 at 1222 hours, during the initial tour, an interview was conducted with Resident 20. Resident 20 stated she was a vegan (a strict vegetarian who consumes no food (such as meat, eggs, or dairy products) that comes from animals),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-13 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement their P&P to ensure proper storage of food in the residents' room as evidenced by: * Resident 347 had the unlabled container filled with muffins at bedside. This had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses in a highly susceptible resident population. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Food from Outside Sources and In room Refrigerators revised 11/2020 showed foods requiring refrigeration and non-perishable items are stored in labeled (with patient name and date of visit), closed containers supplied by the family or guest. On 6/7/22 at 1130 hours, during an inspection of Resident 347's bedside and concurrent interview with LVN 3, a clear plastic container contained seven pieces of muffins. Resident 347's plastic container was not unlabeled with the resident's name, items, and use by dates. LVN 3 verified the findings and stated the food container should have been labeled. When asked about the food, Resident 347 stated the food was brought by a familly member. When asked how…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' identifiable information and medical record were maintained to ensure confidentiality and accessibility. * The facility failed to ensure the resident identifiable information was kept private when the confidential resident rosters were found in the survey binder. This failure put the residents at risk for retaliation. * The facility failed to ensure the Neurological Evaluation Flow sheets for Resident 16 for three of six falls were accessible and available. This had the potential for the residents' care needs not being met as the clinical information was not available. Findings: On 6/9/22 at 0848 hours, a concurrent observation, interview, and facility document review was conducted with the Administrator. A blue binder titled Survey Binder was observed on the wall near the bulletin board. The binder contained the most recent recertification and abbreviated survey results for the facility. Confidential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-13 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of 26 final sampled residents (Resident 51). * Resident 51's calendar of prospective hospice provider's visit was not included in the medical record. In addition, the hospice provider failed to ensure Resident 51's hospice certification from the physician was included in the medical record. These failures had the potential for delayed or uncoordinated care between the facility healthcare team and hospice agency Findings: Review of Resident 51's medical record was initiated on 6/7/22. Resident 51 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Medication Review Report showed an order dated 5/20/22, to admit Resident 51 under Hospice A. On 6/9/22 at 0954 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with LVN 1. LVN 1 stated Resident 51 was currently received hospice care from Hospice A. When asked how she would know when the hospice care providers would visit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations to meet the needs for two of 28 final sampled residents (Residents 87 and 99). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 87 and 99's call light were within the residents' reach. This failure posed a risk in a delay in providing care to the residents and the potential to negatively impact on the residents' well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P &P titled Answering the Call Light reviewed on 1/2025 showed under the general guidelines section, when the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. 1. On 1/5/26 at 0834 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 87. Resident 87 was observed lying in bed. Resident 87's call light was hanging on the left side of the bed far from the resident. Resident 87 attempted to reach for the call light. Resident 87 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-01-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided for one of 28 final sampled residents (Resident 2). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2 was provided with privacy when the resident received wound treatment in front of two other residents in the activity room. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the dignity of the resident and violate the resident's rights to privacy.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Rights revised 1/2025 showed the employees shall treat all the residents with kindness, respect and dignity. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to:- be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity; and- privacy and confidentiality. 1. Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 1/5/26. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Residents 2's MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed cognitive skills…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care for one of one final sampled resident reviewed for respiratory care (Residents 150). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 150's nasal cannula was stored in a sanitary condition. This failure posed the risk for the resident's oxygen equipment to become contaminated with pathogens and had the potential to negatively impact the resident's medical condition.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Departmental Respiratory Therapy Prevention of Infection reviewed dated 1/2025 showed keep the oxygen cannula and tubing used as needed in a plastic bag when not in use. Medical record review for Resident 150 was initiated on 1/6/26. Resident 150 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 150's H&P examination dated 7/24/25, showed the resident had capacity to understand and make medical decisions. Review of Resident 150's Order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medications in the medication room was stored properly. * The facility failed to ensure the bisacodyl (use for constipation) suppository medications were stored separately from eye drop medications. This failure had the potential for the medication degradation and contamination.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Labelling and Storage (undated) showed the medications for external use, as well as hazardous drugs and biologicals, are clearly marked as such, and are stored separately from other medications. On 1/6/26 at 1153 hours, an inspection of Medication Room A and concurrent interview was conducted with RN 1. During the inspection, 10 boxes of bisacodyl suppository, 10 boxes of earwax removal drop and three boxes of eye drops were all stored together. RN 1 verified the findings and stated external and internal medications needed to be separated and not stored together to prevent accidental mix up of the medications. On 1/13/26 at 1415 hours, an interview was conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided appropriate respiratory care. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1's oxygen orders were administered by a license nurse and carried out as ordered by the physician. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1's MDS was accurately coded when the resident was on oxygen. These failures had the potential to affect the respiratory health and well-being of the resident in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Administration (undated) showed the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. The P&P further showed to verify there was a physician's order for this procedure and review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. 1. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 11/25/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-11-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to promote the dignity and respect for one of 30 final sampled resident (Resident 103) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 116). * The facility failed to ensure the CNA was seated at eye-level while assisting Resident 103 with his meal. * The facility failed to ensure the LVN was seated at eye-level while assisting Resident 116 with his meal. These failures posed the risk of not treating the residents with dignity and respect. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Assistance with Meals revised 3/2022 showed the residents who cannot feed themselves will be fed with attention to safety, comfort, and dignity, for example, not standing over residents while assisting them with meals. 1. Medical record review for Resident 103 was initiated on 11/4/24. Resident 103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted back to the facility on 7/11/24. Review of the H&P examination dated 12/22/23, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0554 — pattern
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one nonsampled resident (Resident 137) was assessed for self-administer medications and had an order and established care plan prior to self-administered the medication. This failure had the potential for unsafe medication administration. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Self-Administration of Medications dated 2/2021 showed as part of the evaluation comprehensive assessment, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medication is safe and clinically appropriate for the resident. Medical record review for Resident 137 was initiated on 11/4/24. Resident 137 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 11/4/24 at 0825 hours, a blue jar of Vicks vapor rub was observed on Resident 137's overbed table. Resident 137 applied the vapor rub to the temporal area of her head, both left and right. Resident 137 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-11-07 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the mail package was delivered unopened as per the facility's policy for one of four residents (final sampled resident, Resident 57) interviewed during the resident council meeting. This failure had the potential for the resident's mental anguish. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Mail Delivery dated May 2024 showed the purpose of this policy is to ensure that all patients in skilled nursing facilities receive their mail promptly and securely, while maintaining their privacy and dignity. Medical record review for Resident 57 was initiated on 11/5/24. Resident 57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 57's H&P examination dated 5/29/24, showed Resident 57 had the capacity to understand and make medical decisions. On 11/5/24 at 1124 hours, during the resident council meeting, Resident 57 stated recently, the Central Supply Clerk had delivered an open mail…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-06-13 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to complete the admission MDS assessments timely for two of 26 final sampled residents (Residents 51 and 446). These failures put the residents at risk for not having their care needs met. Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 51 was initited on 6/13/22. Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 51's medical record showed no documented evidence an admission MDS assessment was completed. 2. Medical record review for Resident 446 was initiated on 6/13/22. Resident 446 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 446's medical record showed no documented evidence an admission MD'S assessment was completed. On 6/13/22 at 1401 hours, a telephone interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with the MDS Consultant. The MDS Consultant was asked to review the MDS assessments for Residents 51 and 446. The MDS Consultant stated Resident 51 was admitted on [DATE], and his admission MDS was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-06-13 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to complete the quarterly MDS assessments timely for one nonsampled resident (Resident 12). This failure put the resident at risk of not having their care needs met. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 12 was initiated on 6/13/22. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident 12's medical record showed no documented evidence a quarterly MDS assessment was done. On 6/13/22 at 1401 hours, a telephone interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with the MDS Consultant. The MDS Consultant was asked to review the MDS assessments for Resident 12. The MDS Consultant stated for Resident 12, her last quarterly MDS was dated 2/24/22, and she had her next quarterly MDS due 6/10/22, however it was not done. The MDS Consultant verified both of these assessments were late.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
NIELSEN, CHADIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2024
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$463K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 9%Other / private 24%

This home reported $463K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$473per resident / day
operating cost
$14,377per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$418per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555328. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next