No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Orchard Post Acute

4840 E.tulare Avenue, Fresno, CA 93727 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (559) 251-7161 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (559) 251-7161 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited May 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
4917 E Kings Canyon Rd · (559) 255-8085 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4818 E Tulare St · (559) 252-3585 · Call to confirm hours
Park
190 N Willow Ave · (559) 621-2900 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4863 E Tulare St · (559) 255-4237

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.8%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.9%1.2%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.9%7.3%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.4%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.7%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.4%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.0%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.0%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.7%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.5%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.852.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.621.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 185 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
87.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.61U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 87.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.5%CMS range 37.9–53.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 8.0–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge87.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge79.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 5.3–10.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.281.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
1.18
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.50
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.98
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
48.8%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 91.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-20)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication administration services were provided in accordance with professional standards for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) when the Registered Nurse (RN 1) directed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) to administer medication to Resident 1. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 receiving medications from unlicensed personnel, increasing the risk for medication administration errors and compromising resident safety. Findings: During an interview on 6/9/26 at 11:30 a.m. with CNA 1, CNA 1 stated her current assignment was the low 100 hall. CNA 1 stated she had passed medication to Resident 1 after being asked by a nurse. CNA 1 stated the nurse remained present and observed the administration. CNA 1 stated, She just asked me to take the medication to the Resident 1, and I thought I had to do what my nurse asked of me. CNA 1 stated she did not know what medication was administered. CNA 1 stated she later learned she was not permitted to administer medications because it was outside her scope…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one of three sampled residents when certified nursing assistant (CNA) 1 was aware that Resident 1 required two person total dependent assistance with turning and repositioning while in bed and CNA 1 performed the task independently causing Resident 1 to roll off of the raised bed onto the floor. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining an injury to the right eyebrow and transferred to the acute care hospital for further evaluation.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis for Alzheimer's disease (disorder that primarily affects memory, thinking, and behavior),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food service safety and sanitary conditions, for one of one ice machine, when the facility did not implement Manufacturer's Limited 3 Year Parts And Labor Warranty (MW) and Air- and Water-Cooled User Manual Cleaning, Sanitation and Maintenance (AWM) and the exterior of the ice machine had white, black and green substance. This failure had the potential for the growth of microorganisms which could increase the risk of foodborne illness for all the residents at the facility.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 11/19/2025 at 11:20 a.m. in the kitchen, the ice machine was noted to have some white, black and green substance on the exterior side of the ice machine. The CDM confirmed the presence of the white and green substance on the ice machine. The CDM stated the white substance was calcium buildup. The CDM stated she was unable to confirm what the green substance was. The CDM stated the Maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food storage was stored under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. A large plastic container of rice was in the dry storage pantry without a label and did not have an opened date or an expiration date. 2. Freezer 1 of 2 was observed without an internal thermometer. Refrigerator 1 of 3 was observed without an internal thermometer (a tool used to measure how hot or cold something is). These failures had the potential to contribute to the growth of foodborne pathogens (a tiny organism, like a germ, that could cause disease. Pathogens included things like bacteria, viruses and fungi) and posed a risk of foodborne illness (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods) symptoms which could range from nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, fever, headache, and confusion to residents who received meals and nourishment from the facility's kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and observation on 5/13/25 at 8:22 a.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident-centered care plans for 11 of 24 sampled residents (Residents 7, 12, 18, 21, 32, 39, 45, 53, 76, 78, and 79) when the Activities Director (AD) did not develop resident-centered activity care plans for Residents 7, 12, 18, 21, 32, 39, 45, 53, 76, 78, and 79 since their admission to the facility. These failures resulted in Residents' 7, 12, 18, 21, 32, 39, 45, 53, 76, 78, and 79 not having activities they could engage in, which could lead to boredom, loss of interest, inactivity, depression, feelings of isolation and decreased socialization with others while residing in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (AR- a document containing resident profile information) dated 5/16/25, the AR indicated, Resident 7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), dysphagia (difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of quality of care for seven out of 12 sampled Residents (Residents 24, 27, 29, 48, 56, 58, and 143) when: 1. Resident 24 and Resident 29's oxygen (a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas essential to living organism) flow rate (the amount of oxygen being delivered to the body) were not administered according to their physician order. These failures resulted in Resident 24 and Resident 29 to not received the prescribed amount of oxygen via oxygen concentrator (a machine that pulls in oxygen from the surrounding air) and placed Resident 24 at risk for breathing problems which could include difficulty breathing, headache, and confusion. 2. No Oxygen in Use signage outside of Resident 143's room. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 143's accidental burn. 3. Resident 58 had a physician's order for oxygen at 3 liters per minute (LPM- unit of measurement) and she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a hazard free environment and adequate supervision to prevent accidents was provided for two of three sampled residents (Resident 23 and Resident 27) when: 1. Resident 23 was using two phone books covered with duct tape as a step-stool to assist in getting up into bed that were made by therapy staff. This failure put Resident 23's safety at risk by creating a hazardous environment that could have caused an accident or fall. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident 27 received adequate supervision to prevent accidents despite being identified as a high fall risk. This failure resulted in repeated falls and unsafe situations, with an increased risk of potential bodily harm. Findings: 1. During a current observation and interview on 5/14/25 at 10:08 a.m., with Resident 23, in Resident 23's room, Resident 23 stepped on two blocks made of duct tape (a very strong adhesive tape with a waterproof backing, used to seal home ducts, hoses)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Answering the Call Light, for six of 12 sampled residents (Residents 7, 14, 46, 59, 78, and 293) when the staff did not response to Residents 7, 14, 46, 59, 78, and 293's call lights within 5 minutes. These failures had the potential to result in Residents 7, 14, 46, 59, 78, and 293 not attaining their needs and not maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, emotional, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/16/25 at 2:58 p.m. with Resident 7 in her room, Resident 7 was lying in bed, and did not respond to any questions. During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (AR-a document containing resident profile information), dated 5/20/25, the AR indicated, Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease (progressive brain disorder that gradually damages memory, thinking, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) Medication Storage when two of four sampled medication carts ((Cart 1 and Cart 2) were left unlocked and unattended by Licensed Nurses (LNs). These failures had the potential for residents, staff, and visitors to have unauthorized access to resident medications resulting in theft, overdose, and/or residents not having access to their medications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 5/13/25 at 9:47 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 8, in the hall near the nurse station, medication Cart 1 was observed unlocked and unattended. LVN 8 stated the unlocked medication cart was her cart and she should not have left the cart unlocked when she walked away to get supplies. LVN 8 stated a resident, staff member or visitor could have gotten into the medication cart and harmed themselves by taking unprescribed medication. During an interview on 5/13/25 at 10:30 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated, the medication carts should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for four of 25 sampled residents ( Resident 27, 41, 76, and 193 ) when: 1. Resident 41's urinary catheter bag (a bag attached to a urinary catheter, which is a thin tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine when someone can't urinate normally) and urinary catheter tubing (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) was observed to be on the floor. This failure placed Resident 41 at risk for cross-contamination ( the unintentional transfer of harmful substances from one person, object, or place to another) which could result in infections and illness. 2. LVN 5 did not perform hand hygiene before she went into Resident 27 and 76's room and completed a fingerstick (a finger prick, a way to get a small blood sample from your fingertip) to check their glucose (sugar) levels. This failure placed Residents 27 and 76 at risk of cross-contamination, which could result in infections…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and recorded review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sample residents (Resident 56) received a written notice, including the reason for the room change, prior to being moved to a different room with the facility, when Resident 56 was moved without receiving written communication explaining the change. This failure resulted in Resident 56 being moved without appropriate written communication which had the potential to result in emotional distress and a violation of Resident 56's rights to make informed decision regarding her care and environment. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/15/25 at 11:14 a.m. with Resident 56, in Resident 56's room. Resident 56 stated she was moved to a new room on 5/14/25 but did not receive a written notice of change and was not asked to sign anything. Resident 56 stated it was the second time she had to changed rooms. Resident 56 stated she understood the reason given, and she expressed frustrations being relocated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF-ABN- a notice to provide information to residents/beneficiaries if they wish to continue receiving the skilled services that may be paid for Medicare and assume responsibility) for one three sampled residents (Resident 78) when the Medicare coverage was terminated for Resident 78. This deficient practice resulted in not protecting Resident 78's rights and Resident 78's Representative (RR) right to appeal the termination of Medicare Part A and possibly denying Resident 78's needed services. Findings: During observation on 5/13/25 at 10:13 a.m., in Resident 78's room during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 78 was lying in bed. Resident declined to answer questions. During a review of Resident 78's admission Record, (AR- a document containing resident profile information) dated 5/15/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report unusual occurrences for two of three sampled residents (Residents 28 and 244) when: 1. Resident 28 was attacked by Resident 29 (squeezed his toes and punched him 4 to 6 times in the lower left leg) and the facility did not contact local law enforcement or report the resident-to-resident abuse to the State Survey Agency. This failure put Resident 28's safety at risk, possibly other residents, as well as family and staff members in the facility. 2. Resident 244 was found on the floor by her bed, deceased and the facility did not report this unusual occurrence to the resident's responsible party (RP- a family member of designated person who is the point of contact for the nursing home staff. They can be kept informed about the resident's condition, receive updates, and ask questions) nor the State Survey Agency. This failure placed all residents' well-being and safety at risk residing in the facility due to lack of knowledge of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS-assessment of physical and psychological functions and needs) accurately reflected resident's health and functional status for one of five sampled residents (Resident 21) when Resident 21's deep tissue injury (DTI-localized area of discolored, intact skin, often purple or maroon, or a blood-filled blister due to damage to the underlying tissues) was inaccurately coded in the MDS assessment. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 21's care needs not met and the potential for DTI to worsen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/13/25 at 9:40 a.m. during initial tour in Resident 21's room, Resident 21 was lying in bed. Resident 21 observed not able to move left upper extremity and lower extremities, and limited movement of right upper extremity. During a review of Resident 21's admission Record (AR- a document with personal identifiable and medical information)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow-up with a positive Preadmission screening and Resident Review (PASARR-a federal requirement to ensure residents with mental disorder or intellectual disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in a nursing home) level I screening for one of three sampled residents (Resident 52) when Resident 52's PASARR level I screening required PASARR Level II mental health evaluation on 9/24/24 and was not completed. This failure had the potential for Resident 52 to not receive the appropriate services related to her mental disorder. Findings: During a review of Resident 52's admission Record (AR-a document containing resident profile information), dated 5/20/25, the AR indicated, Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: unspecified psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality), major depressive disorder (persistent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan (a plan that provides direction for individualized care of the resident) within 48 hours of resident's admission for one of two sampled residents (Resident 79) when Resident 79's care plans was not created for the oxygen (O2- a colorless, odorless and tasteless gas essential for life) therapy per physician's order. This failure had the potential for Resident 79 to not receive oxygen therapy as prescribed by the physician which had the potential to result in hypoxia (a condition where tissues and organs don't receive enough oxygen) and respiratory failure (a condition where the lungs are unable to adequately provide oxygen to the blood or remove carbon dioxide). Findings: During an observation on 5/13/25 at 1:23 p.m. with Resident 79 during the tour in Resident 79's room, Resident 79 was lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated wearing a nasal cannula (NC- thin plastic tube that delivers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure services were provided that met professional standards of quality for one of four sampled Residents (Resident 1), when Licensed Nurses did not document Resident 1 's change of condition for an episode of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) on 12/16/24 in accordance with facility's policy and procedure on nursing documentation and change of condition. This failure resulted in an incomplete documentation and assessment for Resident 1 and had the potential for delay in care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis for type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition when the body doesn ' t use insulin properly, resulting in high blood sugar). During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided meet professional standard of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 and LVN 2 did not administer insulin (a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication) per physician's order. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 1 to experience episodes of unstable blood sugar levels such as hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) or hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) that could have a serious outcome affecting resident ' s health and wellness. Finding: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (a document containing demographic information), dated, 11/20/2024 the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1 had the following diagnosis . Partial Traumatic Amputation (loss of a body part) of Left Shoulder and upper Arm .Absence of Right Upper Limb…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of quality for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] and 10/28/24 and no inventory of personal belongings was completed, and the facility did not follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled Personal Property. These failures resulted in Resident 1's personal belongings not being inventoried and the risk for Residents 1's wallet, checkbook and bankcard getting lost. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/5/24 at 12:47 p.m. in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was lying down in bed awake. Resident 1 stated, he was admitted to the facility about three months ago. Resident 1 stated, when he was admitted , he came to the facility with his checkbook, wallet and bank card. Resident 1 stated, he believed his checkbook, wallet and bankcard was in his bedside cabinet. During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — widespread
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for five of 15 sampled residents (Resident 19, Resident 24, Resident 38, Resident 40 and Resident 337) when: 1. Resident 40 was administered 2.5L/min (two point five liter- unit of measurement)/min (minute) oxygen via nasal cannula (NC- plastic device used to deliver supplemental oxygen) instead of 3L/min of oxygen per physician's order. This failure resulted in Resident 40's oxygen needs going unmet and caused Resident 40 received oxygen at different rate. 2. Resident 38 was started on antibiotic (medicines that fight bacterial infections in people) without obtaining a wound (an injury to the skin) culture (a test to find germs such as bacteria, a virus, or a fungus). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 38 receiving unnecessary antibiotic and had the potential for placing Resident 38 at risk for adverse effects (an undesired harmful effect resulting from a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely store, and label drugs and supplies in accordance with acceptable standards of practice when: 1. One medication cart (out of four) was left unlocked and unattended by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3. This failure resulted in a potential for residents and staff to have unauthorized access to medications. 2. One emergency kit (E-kit- emergency medication stored in container) was found without second zip tie in the medication storage room. This failure had the potential for unauthorized access to medication and missing medication. 3. A package containing hearing aid batteries were stored with medication in the medication cart number 4. This failure had the potential for medications and hearing aid batteries to be mixed together. 4. Medications were found in one unlabeled bag, one cup containing multivitamin pill in medication cart number 3. A cup containing medications with applesauce was found in the medication cart number 4. This failure had the potential for residents receiving wrong medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and/or prepared in accordance with professional standards for food services safety for 91 of 96 residents when: 1. A plastic container of dry bran cereal was uncovered in the dry food storage. 2. An uncovered Styrofoam cup with brown liquid was left on top of an ice chest in the dry food storage. 3. No air gap (an unobstructed vertical space between the water outlet and the flood level of a fixture), under the sink where food was being prepared. 4. The food thermometer (a tool to measure temperature), was not calibrated (verifying the capability and performance of an item of measuring and test equipment by comparison to traceable measurement standards), prior to use during lunch service. 5. The thermometer was not sanitized prior to being placed in a metal container of freshly cooked broccoli during lunch service. 6. The temperature of the soup was not measured prior to serving to residents. 7. The cook touched multiple surfaces with gloves on and then continued to serve food during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal for one of three outside trash bins, when one of the trash bins was uncovered, and a large amount of plastic and debris was noted on the ground behind the trash bin. This failure had the potential to attracts animals, insects and pests which could lead to infestations, unsanitary conditions, and the spread of disease. Findings: During an observation on 7/22/24 at 2:24 p.m. behind the facility in the trash bin storage area, a trash bin was observed with the lid open and large amounts of thin clear plastic and other debris was noted behind the trash bins along the fence. During an interview on 7/23/24 at 2:30 p.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the CDM stated, the trash bins should be closed at all times and there should not be trash on the ground or around the trash bins. The CDM stated, the open trash bin and trash on the ground around the trash bins could attract rats and bugs. During an interview on 7/23/24 at 2:45 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for two of three sampled residents (Resident 14 and Resident 67) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 did not address Resident 14 by her name. This failure had the potential for Resident 14 to feel disrespected. 2. Resident 67' foley catheter (an indwelling urinary catheter (a thin tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a bag) drainage bag was without a dignity cover (a cover used to cover and hold the catheter drainage bag so it is not visible). This failure violated Resident 67's right to dignity and privacy and had the potential to affect the self-esteem, self-worth, and quality of life of Resident 67. Findings: 1. During an observation on 7/24/24 at 8:57 a.m. in Resident 14's room, LVN 2 addressed Resident 14 by calling her mama and honey while obtaining Resident 14's blood pressure (the pressure of blood on the walls of your arteries as your heart pumps blood around…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-26 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-assessment of physical and psychological functions and needs) accurately reflected resident's health and functional status for one of three sampled residents (Resident 59) when Resident 59's functional limitation in range of motion was inaccurately coded on the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] and 5/23/24. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 59's care needs not met. Findings: During observation on 7/22/24 at 8:25 a.m. in Resident 59's room, Resident 59 was lying in bed and was assisted by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 8 with breakfast. CNA 8 was spoon-feeding Resident 59. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/24/24 at 12:35 p.m. in the dining room, Resident 59 was seated on her wheelchair, left hand holding a rolled towel and right hand was observed with weakness. CNA 8 was sitting next to Resident 59 and spoon-feeding her lunch. CNA 8 stated Resident 59 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-26 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan (CP -a detailed approach to care customized to an individual resident's needs) for five of six residents (Residents 25, 31, 58, 67, and 74) when Residents 25, 31, 58, 67 and 74 did not have a baseline care plan for the monitoring of anti-platelet medication (medication that prevents blood clots from forming). These failures placed Residents 25, 31, 58, 67, and 74 at risk for complications resulting from not having care needs planned by licensed nurses to determine if nursing interventions needed to be added, changed, or completed. These failures placed Residents 25, 31, 58, 67, and 74 at risk for bleeding and signs of bleeding to go unidentified. Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/22/24 at 11:14 a.m. with Resident 25 in Resident 25's room, Resident 25 was observed dressed sitting in a chair in her room. Resident 25 stated she had been in the facility for four months.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for three of 22 sampled residents (Resident 55, 47, and 387 ) when: 1. Resident 55 did not have a care plan for diagnosis of psychosis (mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality). This failure placed Resident 55 at a potential risk for not monitoring behavior which could lead to psychotic breakdown. 2. Resident 47's use of hearing aids was not care planned. This failure had the potential to cause staff to be unaware of Resident 47's need for the usage of hearing aids and resulted in Resident 47 not wearing her hearing aids. 3. Resident 387 did not have a care plan for communication for a foreign language. This failure had the potential for Resident 387's needs to go unmet. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 55's admission Record (AR- a document which provides resident contact details, a brief medical history level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when: 1. Licensed nurses did not maintain one of one medication rooms in a sanitary manner in accordance with the standards referenced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and facility policy. This failure resulted in the potential harm of cross contamination. 2. Powder was observed on the surface areas around four of four pill crushers and Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN's) did not use appropriate cleaning disinfectant as per manufacturer guidelines. This failure resulted in the potential harm of cross contamination. 3. A certified nursing assistant (CNA) did not perform hand hygiene after handling a bag with feces. This failure had the potential to cross contaminate (the process in which harmful germs transfer from one surface to another) other surfaces and get residents sick. 4. LVN 5 did not remove her gloves or perform hand hygiene (a general term referring to any action of hand cleansing) after obtaining a fingerstick (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician obtained informed consents (a process in which residents are given important information of the possible risk and benefits of the use of medications) for the use of psychotropic medication (medication capable of affecting mind, emotions, and behavior) and antipsychotic medication (a medication used to treat certain types of mental health problems) were completed for one of six sampled residents (Resident 31) when Resident 31 received Citalopram hydrobromide (an antidepressant medication used to treat a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities), and Resident 31 received Quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication that can treat several mental health conditions such as bipolar disorder [a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs]) without a signed informed consent. These failures resulted in Resident 31 to receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for one of five sampled residents (Resident 59) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 8 stood over Resident 59 while spoon feeding her breakfast while lying in bed. This failure resulted in Resident 59 not being provided a respectful and dignified dining experience which could further enhance resident's quality of life. Findings: During an observation on 7/22/24 at 8:25 a.m. in Resident 59's room, Resident 59 was lying in bed with head of the bed elevated and bed was in the highest position. Bedside table on the side of the bed and CNA 8 was standing on the side of Resident 59's bed while spoon feeding her breakfast. During a review of Resident 59's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information) dated 7/25/24, the AR indicated, Resident 59 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for three of eight sampled residents (Residents 19, 44 and 137) when meals were served on plastic trays. This failure did not enhance or promote the rights of the residents to live and experience dining in a manner or environment that was homelike. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/22/24 at 12:01 p.m. in the dining room, staff served Residents 19, 44 and 137 their meals on a plastic trays. Staff placed the entire tray in front of each resident, but did not remove the food plates, beverage glass, utensils, and napkins from the plastic tray. Residents 19, 44 and 137 did not answer any questions asked. During a review of Resident 19's admission Record dated 7/25/24, the AR indicated, Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of one side of the body). During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet the required timelines for encoding, completion and transmission of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (evaluation of cognition, care needs and functional abilities) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 55) when the Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDSN) did not complete or transmit discharge and readmit MDS tracking assessment for Resident 55. This deficient practice resulted in the potential harm of residents' needs upon discharge going unmet. Findings: During a concurrent observation and intervention on 7/22/24 at 8:45 a.m. in Resident 55's room, Resident 55 was sitting up in bed eating breakfast. Resident 55 refused to answer question stated, .Why are you picking on me . During a review of Resident 55's admission Record (AR), dated 7/25/24, the AR indicated, Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar) and psychosis (mental disorder characterized by a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise and implement a person centered comprehensive care plan for one of four sampled residents (Resident 34) when Resident 34 had a decrease in meal intake and care plan interventions were not revised. This failure had the potential for Resident 34's nutritional needs to go unmet. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's admission Record (AR-document containing resident demographic information and medical diagnosis) undated, the AR indicated Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 34's diagnosis included unspecified cerebrovascular disease (a condition that affects blood flow to the brain), type two diabetes mellitus (condition in the way body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel) hypertension (high blood pressure), heart failure (when the heart is failing and cannot supply enough blood to the body) gastroesophageal reflux disease (a condition in which stomach acid repeatedly flows back up into the tube connecting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate resident meal preferences and provide an appropriate alternative for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 35) when Resident 35 received a sandwich on white bread instead of wheat bread. This failure resulted in Resident 35 refusing to eat lunch and missing out on the nutritional value of the meal and had the potential to cause Resident 35 to experience weight loss as a result of not eating. Findings: During an observation on 7/22/2024 at 12:28 P.M. in Resident 35's room, Resident 35 received a sandwich on white bread instead of wheat bread. Resident 35's meal tray ticket indicated wheat bread under preferences. Resident 35's meal ticket indicated his sandwich should have been on wheat bread. During an interview on 7/22/2024 at 12:28 P.M. with Resident 35, Resident 35 stated he did not like white bread, and he would not eat his lunch. Resident 35 stated he had told staff about his preference, and wheat bread was listed on his meal ticket under preferences. During a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain complete and accurately documented records for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 47) when, Resident 47's hearing aids were not documented on her inventory sheet. This failure resulted in Resident 47 not wearing her hearing aids and staff being unaware of where they were located causing Resident 47 to think they went missing. Findings: During a review of Resident 47's admission Record (AR- a document which provides resident contact details, a brief medical history level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 12/20/23, the AR indicated, Resident 4's admitting diagnoses included: encephalopathy (term for any brain disease that alters brain function), muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), and epilepsy (condition which causes recurrent involuntary movements of the muscles). During a review of Resident 47's Minimum Data Set (MDS-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for one of ten sampled residents (Resident 1) when Registered Nurse (RN) 1 left Resident 1's three medications (2 tablets and 1 capsule) in a plastic cup on top of the medication cart unattended. This failure had the potential for other residents to take and administer Resident 1's medications which could result in undesired effects and harm. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/17/23, at 8:06 a.m. with RN 1 outside of Resident 1's room, RN 1 was preparing Resident 1's medications for administration. RN 1 placed Resident 1's buspirone (a medication that treat anxiety [a mental health condition characterized by feeling unease or fear]) 5 MG tab, Donepezil (a medication used to treat Dementia [progressive or persistent loss of brain functioning]) 5 MG and Ramipril (a medication use to treat high blood pressure [the force of blood pushing against the walls…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a complete and accurate discharge notice to ensure a safe discharge for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a written 30-day notice of proposed discharge did not indicate the location to which Resident 1 would be discharged to. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not knowing where she would be residing after the 30 days, causing Resident 1 distress and anxiety. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR) the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of . Parkinson ' s Disease . (a progressive disease of the nervous system) .Bipolar disorder .(characterized by both manic and depressive episodes) .Epilepsy .(A disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed) . During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set [MDS- a resident assessment tool used to identify cognitive (mental processes)] and physical functional level assessment dated [DATE], the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a home like environment for four of 43 sampled residents (Residents 49, 76, 77, and 93) when, the laundry department did not have towels and linens readily available for resident care, and personal clothes were misplaced in the laundry and delayed in getting back to residents. This failure resulted in not meeting residents' basic needs and prefrence by not providing clean linen, towel and personal clothes. Findings: During an interview, on 1/18/22, at 1:47 p.m., with Resident 76, Resident 76 stated the laundry department was a problem. Resident 76 stated there were occasions when she would request linen for her bed, and there would not be any upon request. Resident 76 stated she had clothes and quilts misplaced in the laundry room. Resident 76 stated items were found weeks later after finding them in the donation bin (items donated by either residents or family no longer in the facility) in the laundry storage room. Resident 76 stated the laundry department manager told her they would fix the laundry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During an observation on 1/18/21, at 10:57 a.m., in Resident 59's room, Resident 59 was lying in bed asleep with oxygen at 2 Liters Per Minute (LPM- unit of volume flow measurement) via nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen or increased airflow to a patient or person in need of respiratory help). During a review of Resident 59's Order Summary Report, dated 11/29/21, the Order Summary Report indicated, .Oxygen (O2) at 2 Liters Per Minute (LPM) via Nasal Cannula prn (as needed) per concentrator (a medical device that concentrates oxygen from ambient air) every shift . During a review of Resident 59's Minimum Data Set (MDS-assessment of healthcare and functional needs) assessment dated [DATE], indicated, .Section C . Cognitive Patterns. Section C0500 . Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-assessment of cognitive status) Summary Score 11 of 15 points which indicated Resident 59 had moderate cognitive impairment . During a concurrent interview and record review, on 1/19/22, at 8:55 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled Residents (Resident 11 and 79) received the necessary care and respiratory services, consistent with professional standards of practice when: 1. Resident 11's nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen or increased airflow to a patient or person in need of respiratory help) and humidifier (to humidify the air you breathe) did not have dates to indicate when it was changed. 2. Resident 79's suction catheter (oral suctioning tool made with firm plastic tip used to suction oral secretions to prevent aspiration) connected to the suction machine at bedside did not have date when it was changed and the suction catheter tip was unprotected. These failures had the potential to put Residents 11 and 79 at risk for developing respiratory infection. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 11's clinical record titled, admission Record (document containing resident personal information) dated 1/18/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served met the daily nutritional needs for seven of 77 residents (Residents 4, 14, 45, 65, 77, 78 and 83) when: 1. Residents on large portion diets (Residents 4, 14, 45, 65, 77 and 78) were served more than the required portion size of the mashed potatoes based on the facility's menu. This failure had the potential to result in Residents 4, 14, 45, 65, 77 and 78 to receive more than the recommended daily calorie intake based on the Medical Doctor's order and Registered Dietitian's (RD) assessment of residents' nutritional dietary needs and the potential for unintended weight gain. 2. Resident 83 did not receive a fortified (foods with nutrients added to help boost nutritional value and benefit health) diet as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 83 to not receive the additional calories recommended based on resident nutritional dietary needs. Findings: 1. During a review of facility document titled, Order Listing Report, dated 1/19/22, the order listing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 89) when Humalog Lispro Insulin (is a fast-acting insulin that controls blood sugar around mealtimes for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes) was given without food per professional standard of practice. This failure placed Resident 89 at risk for a low sugar event with the potential to develop symptoms of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) including dizziness, headache, feeling weak, shaking, fast heartbeat, confusion, hunger, sweating or change of consciousness. Findings: During a medication administration observation on 1/19/22, at 11:34 a.m. in resident hallway 1, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 checked Resident 89's blood sugar by fingerstick (a procedure to check blood sugar), and the result was 127. During a medication administration observation on 1/19/22, at 11:43 a.m. in Resident 89's room, RN 1 gave 18 units of Humalog Lispro Insulin subcutaneous injection (injection given in the fatty tissue) in Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of accidents for one of three sampled residents (Resident 83) when Resident 83, who was assessed to require two-person assist for transfers, was transferred by one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on 12/18/21 and did not follow the facility policy and procedure. This failure resulted in Resident 83's fall on 12/18/21 and the potential injury from the fall. Findings: Review of Resident 83's clinical record titled, admission record (document containing resident personal information) dated 12/28/21, indicated Resident 83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: .Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), other lack of coordination, Age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture (is a broken bone that's caused by a disease, rather than an injury), abnormal posture and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement non-pharmacological interventions (individualized approaches to care other than by administering medications, including supportive physical and psychosocial methods) for two of seven sampled residents (Resident 69 and 295) when Resident 69 and 295 had no documented evidence non-pharmacological interventions were tried or attempted first before starting antipsychotic medications (class of medications to treat severe mental disorder in which thought, and emotions are so weak that contact is lost with external reality). These failures put the residents 69 and 295 at risk for experiencing adverse medication side effects and receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications without the appropriate indication. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 69's admission Record (AR-a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 1/21/22, the AR indicated, .Original admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During an observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety when Dietary [NAME] (DC) did not wear a hairnet while inside the kitchen preparation area per facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This failure had the potential to cause cross contamination (physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object or place to another) and foodborne illness (caused by consuming contaminated foods or beverages) to 74 of 77 sampled residents who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings: During initial tour on 1/18/2022, at 9:20 a.m., in the kitchen with the Registered Dietitian (RD) and Dietary Manager (DM), the DC was observed standing in the food preparation area next to the stove and was not wearing a hairnet. During an interview on 1/18/2022, at 9:30 a.m., with the DM, the DM stated the DC should have been wearing a hairnet. The DM stated, Everyone entering the kitchen to the food preparation area were expected to wear a hairnet. During an interview on 1/19/2022, at 8:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GROSSMAN, STEPHENIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/15/2020
MATIACO, JOSHUAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/09/2021
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/06/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$779K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 14%Medicare 19%Other / private 67%

This home reported $779K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$388per resident / day
operating cost
$11,790per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$447per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056225. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next