No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Crystal Ridge Care Center

396 Dorsey Dr, Grass Valley, CA 95945 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (530) 272-2273 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (530) 272-2273 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2025
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
565 Brunswick Rd · (530) 274-7174 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.6 mi
720 Sutton Way · (530) 273-7399 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
616 Sutton Way
Park
110 Spring Hill Dr · (530) 272-3735 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.4%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.2%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.9%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.3%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.7%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.7%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.5%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.8%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.7%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.3%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.4%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.1%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.8%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.862.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.071.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 211 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
75.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 75.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.5%CMS range 44.8–59.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 8.4–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge75.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge72.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge70.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge90.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.6–9.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.26
RN hours/ resident / day
1.14
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.30
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.70
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.14
RN hoursweekends
46.5%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 96.1 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-23)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2022-10-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately and consistently monitor fluid intake status for one of three sample residents (Resident 1).This failure had the potential to delay care and treatment and adversely affect Resident 1's hydration status.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur (fracture on upper part of thigh bone), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), the OSR indicated Resident 1 had an order of Hydration-Notify MD (doctor) if Weekly (7 days) fluid intake average is less than 1500 mL/day (milliliters/day)During a review of Resident 1's Nutritional Risk Assessment (NRA), dated 3/5/26, NRA indicated Resident 1 had a goal of .fluid at least 1500 mL/day to meet nutrition and hydration needs.During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident safety for one resident (Resident 1) when the facility did not provide adequate monitoring and supervision of Resident 1, for a census of 98.This failure resulted in Resident 1 eloping from the facility and reducing the facility's potential in keeping Resident 1 safe from harm.Resident 1's admission Record (AR), indicated that Resident 1 was admitted in September of 2024 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (memory loss), with anxiety (persistent, excessive fear and worry) and mood disturbance.Resident 1's Order Summary dated 1/10/26 indicated, Check placement of wander guard located on left ankle every shift, monitor skin and notify MD [physician] as needed.Resident 1's MDS (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool), the MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment.Resident 1's Care plan (CP) initiated 9/19/24, the CP indicated that Resident 1 had an elopement score of 14 (very…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from abuse when Resident 2 hit Resident 1 on the left side of the face.This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a discoloration on the left jaw and had the potential for Resident 1 to experience fear or distress.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission record, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses that included cerebral atherosclerosis (a condition where plaque builds up in the brain's arteries, narrowing and blocking them) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment and had behaviors of wandering that occurred daily.During a review of Resident 2's admission record, the record indicated Resident 2 was admitted in March 2024 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from elopement (to leave an area of safety unsupervised and undetected) outside the facility. This failure had the potential to result in serious injury or death for Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with a diagnoses that included Dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities). A review of Resident 1's, Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool used to guide care) Cognitive (having full understanding) Patterns, dated 6/23/25, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (a tool to assess a person's full understanding) score of 00 which indicated Resident 1 did not have full understanding and thus, not able to be interviewed. A review of Resident 1's, Wandering Risk Observation/Assessment dated 3/19/25, indicated Resident 1 had a score of 12 which indicated a high risk for elopement and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service when expired or undated food was observed in freezer and dry food cupboards. These failures placed 94 residents out of a census of 95 who received food served by the facility at risk for receiving expired foods. Findings: During an Initial Kitchen tour on 5/20/25 at 8:23 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the following was observed: -in the dessert freezer, a bag of cream puffs was found in a plastic bag that was undated, -in the cupboards dried parsley in a shaker container, a bag of brown gravy mix and bowl of cereal in a covered plastic container were undated and, - powdered cherry jello mix in a shaker container prepared 12/1/24 and be used by 5/1/25. During an observation and interview on 5/20/25 at 8:30 a.m. the DS confirmed the above observations and stated her expectation was that dietary staff should properly label and throw away expired foods. The DS stated that if these items were served to residents, they may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an irregularity was identified during the medication regimen review for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 82) when Resident 82 had an order for a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication (a drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) without a stop date. This failure had the potential for Resident 82 to receive unnecessary medication. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 82 was admitted in September 2024 with diagnoses including anxiety. A review of Resident 82's Order Summary Report dated 3/6/25 indicated, an order for lorazepam (an anti-anxiety medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg, a unit of measurement) every four hours PRN. A review of Resident 82's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed, Resident 82 received lorazepam 31 times in March 2025, 38 times in April 2025, and 27 times in May 2025. In an interview on 5/22/25 at 3:36 p.m. with the Pharmacy Consultant (PC), the PC after reviewing Resident 82's clinical record confirmed that the PRN order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a significant change in status assessment (SCSA, an assessment that indicates major decline or improvement in the resident's status) was initiated for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 294) when Resident 294 developed a stage four pressure ulcer (PU, deep wound reaching the muscles, ligaments, and bones) to the sacrococcyx (joint that connects the sacrum- triangular bone and the coccyx - tail bone). This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide appropriate care and services to Resident 294 based on his status. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 294 was admitted in February 2025 with diagnoses including Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS, a rare neurological disorder where the body's immune system attacks the peripheral nervous system resulting in muscle weakness or temporary paralysis) and adult failure to thrive (FTT, a decline in an older adult's overall health and function). A review of the Skilled Wound Care consult notes for Resident 294 on 4/3/25, 4/10/25, and 4/17/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan to monitor newly identified behaviors was followed for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 50). This failure increased the potential for Resident 50 to take medications without a physician's order and potentially cause side effects or adverse effects to resident. Findings: A review of the clinical records indicated Resident 50 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event), and mental disorder (a condition that affects thinking, feeling, mood, and behavior). A review of Resident 50's Minimum Data Set (MDS- federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 2/25/25 indicated Resident 50 had moderate cognitive impairment with a score of 11 out of 15 in the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided according to accepted standard of practice for three of 26 sampled residents (Resident 50, Resident 88, and Resident 74) when: 1. Resident 50's medications were left at bedside; 2. Resident 88 had no physician's order on the use of neck brace; and 3. Resident 74's order to check placement of resident's Gastrostomy Tube (GT, tube inserted into the stomach to deliver nutrition, and medications) was not followed. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of Resident 50, Resident 88, and Resident 74. Findings: 1. A review of the clinical records indicated Resident 50 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's needs were met for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 77) when the dining room table was too high for the resident during the lunch meal. This failure had the potential to diminish Resident 77's self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: A review of an admission Record indicated Resident 77 was admitted to the facility in May 2025 with multiple diagnoses including dementia (a progressive decline in mental abilities) and diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor would healing). Review of Resident 77's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 3/28/25 indicated Resident 77 had severely impaired cognition. Further review of MDS indicated that Resident 77 needed set up or clean-up assistance for eating. A review of Resident 77's Care Plan dated 5/12/25, indicated Resident 77 had Nutritional Risk: Moderate .interventions . assist resident to the dining room for all meals as tolerated for queuing and feeding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 86) was evaluated and treated by a podiatrist (foot doctor) when Resident 86's toenails were thick, discolored and long. This failure resulted in Resident 86 having pain when walking and had the risk potential to cut the skin. Findings: A review of the facility's document titled admission Record indicated Resident 86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities). During an interview on 5/21/25, at 11:25 a.m., Responsible Party 1 (RP 1) stated she was concerned about her father's long toenails. She stated she noted the toenails were long and had fungus in March. RP 1 further stated she was going to cut them myself but realized his toenails were too thick to do it safely. During an observation and concurrent interview in Resident 86's room with Resident 86 and Certified Nurse Assistant 2 (CNA 2)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician visits were provided timely for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 14) when Resident 14 was not seen by the attending physician every 30 days during the first 90 days of admission. This failure had the potential to delay detection of declining health and the provision of care. Findings: A review of the facility's document titled admission Record, indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the facility late 2024 with diagnoses of Diastolic Heart Failure (the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs causing multiple symptoms), Sleep Apnea (a disorder characterized by repeated pauses in breathing during sleep) and Peripheral Vascular Disease (a condition where circulating blood has difficulty in reaching the body's tissues due to narrowing of blood vessels). A review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool), dated 5/5/25 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was less than five percent (5%) for three of 26 sampled residents, Resident 32, Resident 74, and Resident 194, when: 1. Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3) did not follow the physician's order in administering Resident 32's prescribed medication; and 2. LN 1 did not perform a pre-flush (flushing the tube with water before administering medication, to ensure the tube remains clear and patent) to Resident 74's Gastrostomy Tube (GT, tube inserted into the stomach to deliver nutrition, and medications. GT has 2 ports called feeding port and balloon port which is not used for feeding or medications. These ports are covered with red caps); and 3. LN 5 did not follow the physician's order in administering Resident 194's prescribed medication. These failures resulted in the facility's medication error rate of 12%, and had the potential for harm, worsening of existing conditions or develop new illnesses for Resident 32,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 14) received timely dental treatment when prior dental visits indicated that follow up dental services was necessary. This failure had the potential to place Resident 14 at risk for further oral decline and overall health. Findings: A review of the facility's document titled admission Record, indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on 10/2024 with diagnoses of Diastolic Heart Failure (the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs causing multiple symptoms), Sleep Apnea (a disorder characterized by repeated pauses in breathing during sleep) and Peripheral Vascular Disease (a condition where circulating blood has difficulty in reaching the body's tissues due to narrowing of blood vessels). A review of the facility's document from a traveling hygienist, dated 12/3/24, indicated Resident 14 had, .heavy calculus and heavy inflammation. [Resident 14] will need additional cleaning visits to fully improve the health of his tissue. This document also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adaptive eating equipment (specialized tools and devices designed to assist individuals with disabilities or physical limitations in eating and drinking independently. These aids help make mealtimes easier, more enjoyable, and promote independence) to one out of 26 sampled residents, Resident 10, when Resident 10 did not have a plate guard (a device that clips onto a plate to prevent food from accidentally sliding off) and a two handled cup with a lid during his meals. This failure had the potential to cause dehydration, malnutrition and increased dependency on staff for feeding for Resident 10. Findings: A review of Resident 10's admission Record, indicated, Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on 2/2023 with diagnoses that included Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal Phase (swallowing disorder) and generalized muscle weakness. A review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care) Cognitive Patterns, dated 5/5/25, indicated Resident 10 had short-term and long-term memory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow guidelines for infection control practices and provide safe, and sanitary environment for two of 26 sampled residents, Resident 74 and Resident 40 when: 1. Resident 74's Gastrostomy Tube's (GT, tube inserted into the stomach to deliver nutrition, and medications. GT has 2 ports called feeding port and a balloon port which is not used for feeding or medications. These ports are covered with red caps) red cap fell on the floor, and Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) picked up the red cap and connected it back to one of the GT's ports; and 2. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 5) touched the inside of Resident 40's nosey cup (NC, designed with a nose cutout to encourage correct head position) with her bare hands. These failures had the potential to result in infections for vulnerable residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with LN 1 on 5/21/25 at 1:45 p.m., LN 1 took out medications for Resident 74 from her medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were placed within easy reach of residents for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 34). This failure had the risk potential for the residents to be unable to call for staff assistance with their daily care needs. Findings: Review of an admission Record indicated Resident 34 was admitted to the facility March 2025 with several diagnoses including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of one entire side of the body) following cerebral infarction (decreased blood flow and oxygen to the brain) affecting left side. Review of Resident 34's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 5/2/2025, indicated Resident 34 required substantial/maximal assistance (Helper does more than half the effort) with activities of daily living (ADLs-routine tasks/activities such as bathing, personal hygiene and dressing) and was dependent for toileting. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/20/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote safety measures for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 82) when Resident 82's order for the use of a wanderguard (a device that activates sensors on doors to alarm, alerting staff to intervene when wandering residents attempt to elope) was not followed. This failure increased Resident 82's risk for elopement. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 82 was admitted in September 2024 with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) with behavioral disturbance. During an observation on 5/20/25 at 8:40 a.m. Resident 82 was noted pacing up and down the hallway. Resident 82 was observed being redirected by staff to keep him from wandering to other resident's rooms. A review of Resident 82's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 4/15/25 and 5/16/25 indicated an order for Resident 82 to wear a wanderguard bracelet to the right ankle for safety related to wandering/exit seeking behavior. The order directed nursing staff to check placement of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to follow their medication administration policy and procedure (P&P) for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Licensed Nurse (LN) A documented that LN A had administered medication to Resident 1 when another nurse administered the medication on LN A ' s behalf. This failure resulted in inaccurate documentation and could cause confusion. Findings: A review of the facility ' s P&P titled, Administering Medication, revised 12/1/22, indicated, medication would be administered in a safe manner. The P&P indicated, The individual administering the medication must note the administration on the eMAR [electronic medical record] after giving medication. The P&P indicated, the eMAR would include The signature and title of the person administering the drug. A review of the undated admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of type 2 diabetes (body had hard time controlling blood sugar levels) with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was stored safely for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 stored medication in an unlocked drawer of the bedside table. This failure had the potential for unauthorized persons to have access to medication that was not prescribed to them. Findings: A review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Storage of Medications, revised 4/1/19, indicated, The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. The P&P indicated drugs would be stored in locked compartments. A review of the undated admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses diastolic congestive heart failure (the heart's main pumping chamber becomes stiff and unable to fill properly) personal history of other venous thrombosis (blood clot that usually occurred in the leg or arm) and embolism (blood clot in the lung). A review of the annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the floor was sticky through out the room. This had the potential to spread infection. Findings: A review of the facility ' s policy and procedure titled, Infection Prevention and Control, revised 11/1/23, indicated, the facility had established an infection prevention program that helped prevent the spread of infection and residents would be provided a safe and sanitary environment. A review of the undated admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of diastolic (congestive) heart failure (when the heart did not adequately pump blood) and had a history of falling. A review of the annual (yearly) Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 9/26/24, Section C, indicated, Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment that tested a resident ' s ability to recall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician ' s orders when three of four sampled residents (Resident 2, 3, and 4) did not receive their morning medications in a timely manner as per professional standards. These failures resulted in the delay of prescribed medications being administered and the potential for negative outcomes that could affect residents ' health and well-being. Findings: A review of the facility ' s policy titled Physician Orders dated 8/2024, indicated The staff shall carry out physician/nurse practitioner ' s orders as prescribed. A review of the facility ' s policy titled Administering Medications revised 3/22/18, indicated Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. A review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record (undated), indicated that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an incentive spirometer (IS, a handheld device that helps patients improve lung function by teaching them to breathe in slowly and deeply) to meet the needs for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2). This failure had the potential to adversely affect the health and well-being of Resident 2. Findings: A review of the facility ' s policy titled Respiratory Care-Clinical Protocol revised 11/22, indicated The staff and physician/nurse practitioner will monitor the progress of individuals with respiratory conditions, including ongoing evaluation of condition changes. The physician/nurse practitioner will monitor the individual for beneficial and adverse effects of medications used to treat respiratory conditions. A review of the facility ' s policy titled Physician Orders revised 8/2024, indicated Prescribed medication and treatment orders will be carried out in accordance with the physician/nurse practitioner order. A review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record (undated), indicated that Resident 2 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards when: 1. A discontinued medication was not removed and discarded from an active medication drawer in Medication Cart B2 (MC B2, a movable piece of equipment used to store, transport, and dispense medicines). 2. MC B2 was not locked and left unattended. 3. Physician ' s instructions on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Pradaxa (a medication used to prevent blood from clotting) and the pharmacy label instructions for Pradaxa did not match. These failures had the potential for medication errors and drug misuse. Findings: A review of the facility ' s policy titled Medication Labeling revised 2/2023, indicated Medications are labeled in accordance with applicable federal and state requirements and currently accepted Pharmacy practices. 8. If medication containers have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels, contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 1) was provided with a nourishing meal to meet his daily nutritional need when Resident 1 did not receive a meal for. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 being hungry throughout the night. Findings: A review of the policy titled Food and Nutrition Services revised October 2017, indicated Each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration and the preferences of each resident. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (undated), indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy (seizure disorder), heart failure, depression, and bipolar disorder (personality disorder). A review of Resident 1 ' s Annual Minimum Data Set (a complete clinical assessment) dated 9/12/24, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, evaluates a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1), received medication and blood sugar monitoring (checking the level of sugar in the blood for diabetics) at the correct time as ordered by the physician when: 1. Famotidine (medication to decrease stomach acid) was not administered to Resident 1 at 6:00 am for 6 out of 15 days in December 2023 (12/1, 12/7, 12/8, 12/9, 12/13, 12/14.) This failure caused Resident 1 to experience burning in his stomach and made it hard for Resident 1 to eat his meals. 2. Blood sugar monitoring was ordered by the physician 4 times a day for Resident 1 and the facility was monitoring Resident 1 ' s blood sugar 3 times a day. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have untreated high or low blood sugar levels. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1 ' s record titled, admission Record, dated 9/9/2022 indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of Crohn ' s…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. The preparation sink next to the stove (Cook prep sink) did not have an air gap (an air gap refers to a fixture that provides back-flow prevention. When installed and maintained properly, the air gap works to prevent drain water from backing up into the sink and possibly contaminating the area used for washing food. An air gap is a way to make certain wastewater and contaminants never re-enter the clean water supply), which had the potential for backflow from the drain to contaminate the sink. This had the potential to cause foodborne illness, (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food). 2. The ice machine was not kept in sanitary condition with brownish discoloration when checking with a white paper tower. This had the potential to cause foodborne illness. 3. The rusting silver shelves were not smooth and easily cleanable and had stored clean water pitchers and cleaned storage containers which had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to make it known to five out of six sampled residents how a grievance was formally filed. This had the potential to prevent residents making their grievances known, particularly those who wished to do so anonymously. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled Filing Grievances/Complaints, revised 1/2021, indicated, A copy of our grievance/complaint procedures is posted on the resident bulletin board. During a Resident Council interview, on 10/6/22, at 10:24 AM, to the question, Do you know how to file a grievance? five out of six Council attendees indicated they knew they could have lodged a complaint to staff verbally but were unaware they could have filed a written grievance. During an observation, on 10/6/22, at 11:56 AM, with the Administrator (ADMIN), there was no process on the main resident bulletin board about filing a written grievance. The Patients' Rights: Skilled Nursing Facilities posting, which contained a passage regarding the right to file grievances, was high on the top row, above standard height, in print…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision adequate to meet the increasing needs of one resident out of a sample of eight (Resident 42), when they failed to proactively intervene to prevent him from wandering into other residents' rooms and touching them/their belongings, and from witnessing his aggression toward staff. This failure resulted in residents feeling unsafe and had the potential to result in injuries and other negative outcomes for Resident 42 and other residents. Findings: A review of a facility policy, titled, Safety and Supervision of Residents, revised 7/2021, indicated, Resident supervision is a core component of the systems approach to safety. The type and frequency of resident supervision is determined by the individual resident's assessed needs and identified hazards in the environment. A review was made of an admission Record for Resident 42 who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 42's diagnoses included cerebral infarction (the brain's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure training to staff who provided residents with supervision during cigarette, smoking breaks when two out of three staff members were not able to state where to find fire safety equipment (fire extinguisher, fire blanket) at the designated resident smoking area. This failure had the potential to cause physical and psychosocial harm to residents in the event of a fire. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 10/6/22, at 7:03 PM, located at the resident smoking area, Certified Nurse Assistance (CNA) C had supervised two residents during a scheduled resident smoking break. CNA C was asked where the fire safety equipment was located and had been observed looking around the area. CNA C pointed to the corner of the building and stated there was the fire extinguisher. CNA C was not able to state where the fire blanket was located, what a fire blanket was, or what the fire blanket was used for. CNA C stated no training had been provided by the facility prior to supervising resident smoking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-07 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff had appropriate competencies to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services when two Dietary Aides (DA A and DA B) were unable to follow Quat container test strip paper's length of time instruction to check the concentration of the quaternary sanitizer (Quat, a solution used to sanitize kitchen work surfaces). This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illness (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food) to all residents, in a medically compromised population of 83 out of 85 residents who received foods from the kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/4/22 at 10:29 AM, with the Dietary Aide A (DA) checked the Quat sanitizer red bucket located in the diet aide prep sink area. DA A dipped Quat test strip into the Quat red bucket for five seconds, it showed as yellowish color. DA A compared Quat test strip with Quat test strip paper container and stated the Quat sanitizer was not in the correct concentration. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from loss of personal property when more than 30 pieces of unlabeled resident clothing items had been observed hanging in a covered clothing rack and staff were unaware of facility expectations with regards to who was responsible for the inventory and labeling of residents' personal clothing. This failure resulted in the loss of resident personal property. Findings: During an interview on 10/6/22, at 7:48 AM, Janitor (JAN) stated Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) should have inventoried resident personal clothing, placed the clothing in a bag, and labeled the bag with the resident's name and room number. JAN stated responsibility for labeling resident personal clothing fell upon JAN, and staff would often deliver resident personal clothing to the laundry area without any resident identifiers (name or room number). During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/6/22, at 8:04 AM, Housekeeping Manager (HM) stated the Social Services Department performed initial inventory of resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide effective pain management for one out of two residents (Resident 228) when staff failed to notify the facility's General Internal Medicine ([NAME]) of Resident 228's consistent use of as needed (PRN) pain medication. This failure caused a delay in effective pain management and psychosocial harm. Findings: A review of the facility's record indicated Resident 228 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of chronic pain due to trauma, cervicalgia (neck pain), low back pain, pressure ulcer of sacral region (lower back), stage two (open wound that can be tender or painful), pressure ulcer of left hip, stage three (wound extends past the top layer of skin), and pressure ulcer of left buttock, stage four (wound may extend to muscle, tendon or bone). Resident 228 was her own responsible party and could make her own medical decisions. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 10/5/22, at 10:55 AM, resident 228…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. This failure had the potential for RN assessment skills and supervision not to be provided daily to residents and staff. Findings: The facility policy, titled, Staffing, revised 10/1/17, was reviewed. The policy indicated that the facility provided sufficient numbers of staff with the skills and competency necessary to provide care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. The facility Job Description, titled, RN - SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) or Sub-acute, revised 3/1/14, was reviewed. It indicated that the primary function of the RN was to ensure that effective and efficient nursing care was provided as prescribed by the physician and as required by the facility's policies and procedures. Also listed among the job functions was the ability to demonstrate and supervise direct nursing care to improve standards of nursing. A United States Department of Health and Human Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure (1 of 3) of the garbage dumpster lids were closed properly. This failure to ensure the garbage was contained properly had the potential to attract pests and rodents. Findings: During an observation on 10/4/22 at 9:33 AM, located outside of the facility at the kitchen exit, the middle dumpster lid was not closed. During an observation on 10/4/22 at 5:05 PM, located outside of the facility at the kitchen exit, the middle dumpster lid was not closed. During an interview on 10/5/22 at 8:53 AM, with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) stated I always have to go outside to close the dumpster lids. CDM claimed the potential issue that dumpster lids were not closed was birds and animals could get into the dumpsters to get trash. CDM confirmed leaving the dumpster lids opened had the potential to create a high level of contamination issues. During an interview on 10/5/22 at 3:10 PM, with the CDM confirmed Yes, I know there is a problem with the dumpster lids and keeping them closed. During an observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-03-08 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool for a residents cognitive and physical abilities) Assessments for two of 12 sampled residents (Residents 12 and 41) when: 1. Resident 12's hearing function was not coded accurately on the MDS assessment. 2. Resident 41's use of the urinary catheter (a tube placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder) was not coded accurately on the MDS assessment. These failures placed Resident 12 and 41 at risk of not receiving an individualized plan of care based on the residents' specific needs. Findings: During an observation on 3/5/19, at 8:20 a.m., in Resident 12's room, she capped her hand on her right ear and stated, Can't hear. Resident 12 stated she was unable to hear from her right ear. During a concurrent interview and clinical record review for Resident 12, with the assistant director for social services (DSS), on 3/07/19, at 1:50 p.m., the DSS reviewed the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards for food service safety, sanitary conditions, and the prevention of foodborne illness when: 1. RN 1 handled and distributed resident meal trays prior to performing hand hygiene and after touching her hair. 2. [NAME] 1's apron strings touched the floor and were tied by [NAME] 1 after being donned and prior to plating food. 3. Wet brushes used to spread butter were placed in a drawer without being thoroughly dried. This failure had the potential for unsanitary conditions that could lead to contamination and foodborne illness. Findings: 1. During an observation of Registered Nurse (RN) 1 in the Main Dining Room on 3/5/19, at 12:45 p.m., RN 1 entered the dining room without washing her hands. RN 1 walked toward the food tray cart and opened the doors to check the meal trays. RN 1 picked up the plate lids and grabbed the plate with her unwashed hands. RN 1 verified the meals served on the trays, she picked up a served glass of beverage from the cart and began to run her left hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-03-08 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and administrative document review, the facility failed to have a policy and procedure regarding the handling and storage of foods brought to residents by family and visitors from outside the facility to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling and consumption. This failure has the potential to limit the resident rights to have food brought in by the family and visitors and stored by the facility for later consumption. Findings: During an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 9), on 3/7/19, at 2:46 p.m., she stated there was no way to heat up food for families who requested food brought in from outside the facility to be reheated. CNA 9 stated just last week someone asked her to reheat a food plate brought from outside for a resident of the facility. CNA 9 stated she was not able to reheat the food plate and fulfill the request because she was not allowed to enter the kitchen with food brought in from outside the facility.s During an interview with CNA 10, on 3/7/19, at 2:50 p.m., she stated items such as fruit or ice cream brought in for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-03-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a complete and accurate record when the POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form (describes patient wishes on end-of-life care), was unsigned by a physician for one of five residents (Resident 67). This failure had the potential for Resident 67's wishes not to be honored in the event of an emergency. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review with the Medical Records Director (MDR), on 3/6/19, at 9:18 a.m., she reviewed the clinical record and stated there was a POLST form without a physician's signature. The POLST was attached to the top of the chart with a rubber band and dated 2/1/19. The MDR stated she had no idea why the POLST wasn't signed by the physician. During an interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2), on 3/7/19, at 2:36 p.m., she reviewed Resident 67's POLST form and stated it required a physician signature in order for it to be valid. LVN 2 stated the POLST had not been signed by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention control program for 4 of 42 sampled residents (Resident 64, Resident 480, Resident 66 and Resident 41) when: 1. Resident 64, Resident 480 and Resident 66's oxygen cannula's (device with tubing to deliver oxygen) were left uncovered and exposed. 2. Certified nursing assistant (CNA 1) and the license vocational/treatment nurse (LVN/Tx Nurse) performed resident care on Resident 41 with soiled gloves and without performing hand hygiene. These failures placed the residents' health and safety at risk for cross contamination and spread of infection. Findings: 1. During an observation on 3/5/19 at 8:45 a.m., in Resided 64 's room, an oxygen cannula laid uncovered on the wheel chair seat. During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 480, on 3/5/19, at 9:15 a.m., in Resident 480's room, an uncovered oxygen cannula was coiled around the humidifier attached to the oxygen source and to Resident 480's wheelchair. Resident 480 stated, I use the oxygen when I need it, that's why…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote a dignified dining experience for one of five sampled residents (Resident 67) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 wore gloves while feeding Resident 67. This failure had the potential to diminish Resident 67's self-worth. Findings: During an observation in the main dining room, on 3/5/19, at 12:56 p.m., CNA 2 sat at the table next to Resident 67 feeding the resident while wearing gloves. During an interview with CNA 2 in the main dining room, on 3/5/19, at 1:10 p.m., CNA 2 stated she usually wore gloves to feed residents. CNA 2 stated she wore gloves while feeding residents in case she had to touch other residents' meal trays. CNA 2 stated her practice of wearing gloves while feeding residents and handling other resident meal trays with the same gloves was to make sure she did not violate infection control practices. CNA 2 stated she could have used hand sanitizer to disinfect her hands instead of wearing gloves while feeding Resident 67. CNA 2 stated wearing gloves while feeding Resident 67…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-08 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a Person-Centered baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission to meet the resident's immediate needs for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 41) when baseline care plans were not developed on the use of Indwelling Urinary Catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine), and Fall risk. These failures placed Resident 41's health at risk when resident's needs were not care planned to meet her immediate needs. Findings: 1. During an observation on 3/5/19 at 8:35 a.m. in Resident 41's room, the resident was on her bed in a semi-sitting position eating breakfast. Resident 41 had a urinary catheter connected to a urine bag covered with a cloth attached to the lower right side of the resident's bed. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 41, titled, Face Sheet (document with resident's demographic information and medical diagnosis) included, . Neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder [a problem in which a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an activity person-centered comprehensive care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 19) to meet Resident 19's activity preferences and goals identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. This failure had the potential to result in not meeting Resident 19's activity preferences. Findings: Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of resident's cogniitve and physical abilities) Comprehensive Assessment, dated 9/19/18, Section F400 Interview for Activity Preferences, indicated, While at the facility, it was very important to have books, newspapers, and magazines to read, . to listen to the music you like . to do favorite activities . During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 19's care plan on Activities on 3/6/19, at 4 p.m., with the activity director (AD), the AD reviewed the Activities care plan and stated the care plan did not include hobby interest and preferences that were identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment on activity. The AD stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan within seven days from the completion of the comprehensive assessment for one of two sampled residents (Resident 40) when the comprehensive care plan for Resident 40's indwelling urinary catheter (tubing inserted into the bladder) was not completed in a timely manner. This failure placed the resident's health and safety needs at risk of being unmet. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 41, on 3/5/19, at 8:35 a.m., in Resident 41's room, the resident was on her bed in a semi-sitting position eating breakfast. There was a urine drainage bag covered with a cloth attached to the lower right side of the resident's bed. Resident 41 stated she had an indwelling urinary catheter. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 41, titled, Face Sheet (document with resident's demographic information and medical diagnosis) included, . Neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder [a problem in which a person lacks bladder control.] During a review of Resident 41's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a resident centered activities program for one of two sampled residents (Resident 19) when she was not offered activities of choice and preference to promote pleasure, creativity and self fulfillment. This failure resulted in Resident 19's preferences in activities to go unmet. Findings: During a review of the computerized printed activity calendar on 3/5/19, at 9 a.m., activities for for 3/5/19 included the following: At 7:45 a.m. Music [in facility activity room [ROOM NUMBER]], at 9:15 a.m., Local News-The Union Newspaper, at 10:30 a.m. History of Mardi Gras [in activity room [ROOM NUMBER]], at 11:15 a.m., Sit and stretch with [activity staff], at 2 p.m., Crafts-Beading [in activity room [ROOM NUMBER]] at 3 p.m. Mardi Gras Social, at 6:45 p.m., Movie [in activity room [ROOM NUMBER]]. During an interview with Resident 19 on 3/5/19, at 2:36 p.m., she stated she had not attended activities at the facility because she was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
WOLF, SALINAIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2024
ANDRUS, ROMANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/21/2023
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 20%Medicare 14%Other / private 66%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$410per resident / day
operating cost
$12,458per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$418per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555283. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next