Wolf Creek Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 186 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 54.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety for two out of six sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when:1. Resident 1 left the facility without staff knowledge and was found at a gas station without her Wander Guard (wearable monitoring device that alerts caregivers when a resident leaves a protected area); and2. Resident 2 had an avoidable fall (unintentional fall that happens because of identifiable and correctable factors) when she was not properly secured during transportation to an appointment.This failure resulted in Resident 1 leaving the facility unsupervised and increased her risk for harm and injury and in Resident 2 sustaining a left femur (lower end of thigh bone) fracture (crack, break, or chip in bone) that required surgery. Findings:1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, it indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility November 2025, with multiple diagnoses which included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent for the administration of a Covid Vaccine (vaccine designed to induce immunity against SARS-Co-V-2, virus responsible for coronavirus disease 2019) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was administered the vaccine after Resident 1's RP's (Responsible Party) declined the vaccine. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to receive a covid vaccine without consent and violated the resident's RP's right to make health care decisions.Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to facility 4/10/13 with diagnoses that included, TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury, a complex injury by sudden external trauma that damages brain tissue), and cognitive deficit (impairment in mental processes including memory, attention, and executive function-that affect ability to learn, reason and make decisions). During an interview on 1/27/26 at 5 p.m. with Resident 1's daughter (RP), the RP stated on 1/27/26 that Resident 1 was not supposed to receive a Covid Vaccination, the chart was marked in big red letters not to vaccinate.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Policy and Procedures (P&P) and ensure professional standards of practice were met for one of six sampled residents (Resident 3) when, Resident 3 was administered medications with possible drug interactions without clarification from the doctor.This failure had the potential to have caused adverse outcomes and worsen Resident 3's condition and decreased the potential to provide safe administration of medication.During a review of Resident 3's clinical record, Resident 3 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis that included Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH) (bleeding directly into the brain tissue from causes other than injury), Hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), Transient Ischemic Attack (temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain), Cerebral Infarction (blood clot blocks an artery supplying the brain, leading to a lack of oxygen and nutrients, causing brain tissue death).During a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-22 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for a census of 53 residents when the Registered Dietician (RD) and Dietetic Services Supervisor (DSS) were both hired as part time (an employee who is scheduled to work and who does work a schedule of anything under 32 hours per week) employees. This failure had the potential for unsafe food handling and spread of food borne illnesses in a highly susceptible population. Findings: During an interview on 5/19/25 at 9:40 a.m. with the DSS, the DSS stated she was working as a part time employee for the facility and was also working at another facility. The DSS further stated that their RD was also working as part time employee and the Dietetic Services Supervisor in Training (DSSIT) who was not yet licensed, was working as full-time employee. A review of the DSS's employment document titled, New Hire Input Form, dated 9/7/24, indicated the DSS was hired as a part time employee of the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food storage and preparation, and maintenance of food contact surfaces were in accordance with professional standards for food safety for the 53 residents who ate facility prepared meals when: 1. Three out of three small cutting boards had stains, and two out of six large cutting boards had deep scratches; and, 2. A box of garlic bread, a box of fried eggs, and a box of bacon were found with ice crystals built-up, opened and were exposed to air in the freezer. These failures had the potential to put residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/19/25, within the initial kitchen tour beginning at 8:23 a.m., with the Dietetic Services Supervisor in Training (DSSIT), three out of three small cutting boards were found stained with brownish substance, and two out of six large cutting boards were found with deep scratches. The DSSIT confirmed the observation and stated cutting boards with stains and deep scratches could potentially harbor bacteria.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for one out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 17) when: 1. Resident 17's nebulizer (machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) face mask was not changed every seven days and was left uncovered when not in use; and, 2. Resident 17's oxygen nasal cannula (a medical device with two prongs that is connected to an oxygen source used to deliver supplemental oxygen directly into the nostrils) was not changed every seven days. These failures resulted in an increased risk for cross-contamination (movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another), potential exposure to germs, and may cause infection to Resident 17. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 17's clinical record indicated Resident 17 was admitted April of 2025 and had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a group of diseases that causes airflow blockage and breathing-related problems),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures as well as professional standards of care for one out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 20), when Resident 20 did not receive insulin (hormone that controls the amount of sugar in the blood) medication within the parameters as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for Resident 20 to experience hypoglycemia (condition where the level of sugar in the blood drops below a healthy range) and for the resident to not achieve their highest practicable well-being. Findings: Resident 20 was originally admitted to the facility in September 2022 with multiple diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition where the body either doesn't produce enough insulin or doesn't respond properly to the insulin). A review of Resident 20's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 3/18/25, indicated, Resident 20 was cognitively intact. During a review of Resident 20's Order Summary Report, dated 5/21/25, Resident 20…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 2) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and facility's policy, procedure (P&P), and care plan when Resident 2's suprapubic catheter (a tube that drains urine from the bladder through a small incision in the lower abdomen) drainage bag was not positioned below Resident 2's bladder during a wound care treatment. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to develop infection and possible suprapubic catheter complications. Findings: A review of Resident 2's clinical record indicated Resident 2 was initially admitted September of 2024 and had diagnoses that included hemiplegia (complete loss of the ability to move one side of the body) and hemiparesis (partial weakness of one side of the body), urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract), and obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage in the urinary tract that prevents urine from flowing properly causing backflow of urine from the bladder into the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 43) received appropriate pain management services consistent with professional standards of practice, facility's policy and procedure (P&P), and physician's order when Resident 43's pain medication orders were not consistently followed. This failure had the potential for Resident 43 to experience over medication, not achieve pain relief, and not attain her highest practicable well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 43's clinical record indicated Resident 43 was admitted April of 2025 and had diagnoses that included infection following a surgical procedure, fracture (a break in the continuity of a bone) of left lower leg, osteomyelitis (a serious infection of the bone), neuropathy (a nerve condition that can cause pain, numbness, tingling, or weakness in the body), and opioid dependence (reliance on a substance found in certain prescription pain medications). A review of Resident 43's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) Cognitive Patterns,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment when one out of three sampled residents, (Resident 1), had oxygen tubing, suctioning tubing and yankhauer (hard tube-like plastic tool which is placed into a person ' s mouth to suction secretions) laying on Resident 1 ' s bedroom floor. This failure had the potential to transmit communicable diseases and infections to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s record titled, admission Record, dated 11/28/2023 indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 1 was admitted with cancer of the major salivary glands (glands located in and around the mouth area), trouble swallowing, muscle weakness and a gastrostomy tube, (tube inserted directly into the stomach used for nutrition when a person cannot eat using their mouth). During a review of Resident 1 ' s record titled, Order Summary Report, indicated Resident 1 had an order for: 1. Oxygen 2 liters via nasal cannula (tube that is connected to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect Resident 1 from abuse when Resident 1 was scratched on the face and her hair was pulled by Resident 2. This failure caused a scratch to the left cheek and mild scalp pain for Resident 1, potentially leading to adverse clinical outcomes. Findings: A review of Resident 1's (R1) admission Record, indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, difficulty speaking and lack of coordination. A test for mental function referred to as a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was scored as a12 on 8/03/23, indicating moderate cognitive (ability to think and reason) impairment. A review of Resident 2's (R2) admission Record, indicated R2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including psychosis (a collection of symptoms that affect the mind, where there has been some loss of contact with reality) and anxiety disorder. R2 had a BIMS score of 2 on 7/26/23, indicating severe cognitive impairment. A review of R1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $837K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA