No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hanford Post Acute

1007 West Lacey Blvd, Hanford, CA 93230 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 124 certified beds · (559) 582-2871 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (559) 582-2871 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
869 W Lacey Blvd · (559) 582-9313 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
365 Campus Dr · (559) 583-1480 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
130 N 11th Ave · (559) 410-8006 · Call to confirm hours
Park
113 Court St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.5%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%4.0%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.9%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.8%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.5%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%4.3%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.8%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.6%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.8%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.7%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.0%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.522.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.911.571.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 115 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.1%CMS range 43.4–62.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.3%CMS range 6.6–12.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.6–11.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.451.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.15
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.76
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.93
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.14
RN hoursweekends
55.7%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 85.7 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.15 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.76 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.15 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-24)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-05)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent falls for two of six sampled residents (Residents 1 and 4) when: 1. Nursing staff were aware of Resident 1's cognitive impairment (difficulties with mental processes such as memory, attention, reasoning, and decision making), poor safety awareness, impulsive behaviors of getting up from bed without using the call light, history of falls, and did not implement effective interventions to prevent falls. These failures resulted in Resident 1 suffering avoidable falls on the following dates: 9/30/24, 11/5/24, 12/9/24, 12/16/24, 12/18/24, and 2/1/25. and placed the resident at risk for injury, pain. and suffering. These failures resulted in Resident 1's experiencing five unwitnessed falls prior to the avoidable fall on 2/1/25 with injury, sustaining a (laceration (cut in the skin caused by an injury) above the left eyebrow requiring transportation to the emergency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program for three of six sampled residents (Residents 3, 5 and 6) when: 1. Resident 5 ' s oxygen concentrator (a device that concentrates the oxygen from the ambient air) was being used without a filter. 2. Resident 3 and Resident 6 ' s oxygen concentrator filters were covered with dust and lint. These failures placed Residents 3, 5 and 6 at an increased risk to develop respiratory and healthcare-associated infections. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (AR, a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 5/12/25, the AR indicated, Resident 5 was admitted from an acute care hospital on 4/27/25 to the facility, with diagnoses that included Congestive Heart Failure (CHF- weakness in the heart where fluid accumulates in the lungs), Hypertension (high blood pressure), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- is a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for one of six sampled residents (Resident 4) when Resident 4 was administered 4.5 L/min (liters-unit of measurement)/min (minute) of oxygen via Nasal cannula (NC- plastic device used to deliver supplemental oxygen) instead of 2L/min of oxygen per physician's order. This failure had the potential to put Resident 4 at risk to oxygen toxicity (a lung damage that happens from breathing too much supplemental oxygen; it can cause coughing and trouble breathing; in severe cases it can even cause death). Findings: During a Review of Resident 4's admission Record, (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 5/12/25, the AR indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Congestive Heart Failure (CHF- weakness in the heart where fluid accumulates in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were hospitalized were permitted to return to the skilled nursing facility (SNF-a healthcare facility that provides a higher level of care that what is typically offered in assisted living or residential care) for one of seven residents (Resident 5) when the facility refused to take Resident 5 back after Resident 5 was medically cleared (when a patient no longer needs to receive inpatient care) to return to the facility from the acute care hospital (ACH-is a healthcare facility that provides short-term, intensive treatment for patients with serious medical conditions). This failure placed Resident 5 at risk for psychosocial harm by not allowing the resident to return to the SNF and caused her to be transferred to a different SNF. This caused her emotional stress and repeated request to come back to the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (AR- a document containing resident medical and personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed and implemented to meet the identified needs for one of six sampled residents (Resident 4) when Resident 4 was assessed as being a fall risk, had known behaviors of standing up without staff supervision and the facility did not put a fall risk care plan with effective interventions into place to prevent falls. This failure resulted in Resident 4 falling eight times, on 1/19/25, 1/23/25, 1/28/25 at 8:45 a.m., 1/28/25 at 3:17 p.m., 2/2/25, 2/4/25, 2/10/25 and 2/14/25 placing the resident at risk for significant injuries. (Cross reference F689) Findings: During a review of Resident 4 ' s admission Record, undated, the admission record indicated, Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture (break in bone) of the skull, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait (pattern of walking) and mobility (ability to move freely), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Administrator (ADM) failed to provide consistent administrative oversight and resources to ensure residents received adequate supervision and care planning when the administrator was aware of multiple falls for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) and did not ensure the Interdisciplinary Team implemented effective fall prevention interventions. These failures resulted in Resident 1 suffering avoidable falls on the following dates: 9/30/24, 11/5/24, 12/9/24, 12/16/24, 12/18/24, and 2/1/25. and placed the resident at risk for injury, pain. and suffering. These failures resulted in Resident 1 ' s experiencing five unwitnessed falls prior to the avoidable fall on 2/1/25 with injury, sustaining a (laceration (cut in the skin caused by an injury) above the left eyebrow requiring transportation to the emergency department (ED) for sutures (a row of stitches holding together edges of a wound) and avoidable pain and suffering. Resident 1 had two additional avoidable falls.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify and develop an effective QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement-a systematic, comprehensive, and data-driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes while involving all nursing home caregivers in practical and creative problem solving) program when the facility ' s QAPI failed to utilize resident fall data to establish an effective safety plan for fall prevention for one of six sampled residents (Residents 1). These failures resulted in Resident 1 suffering avoidable falls on the following dates: 9/30/24, 11/5/24, 12/9/24, 12/16/24, 12/18/24, and 2/1/25. and placed the resident at risk for injury, pain. and suffering. These failures resulted in Resident 1 ' s experiencing five unwitnessed falls prior to the avoidable fall on 2/1/25 with injury, sustaining a (laceration (cut in the skin caused by an injury) above the left eyebrow requiring transportation to the emergency department (ED) for sutures (a row of stitches holding together edges of a wound) and avoidable pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for five out of fourteen sampled residents (Resident 51, Resident 75, Resident 84, Resident 342, and Resident 343) when: 1. Resident 51's care plan was not developed and implemented to address the use of an assistive device transfer pole (an adjustable pole that is installed from ceiling to floor and used to assist in transfers). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 51 not receiving appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to ensure safe transfer needs are met to prevent injury. 2. Resident 75's care plan was not developed and implemented to address toenail assessment and condition. This failure resulted in Resident 75 not receiving appropriate, consistent, and individualized toenail treatment and monitoring which could lead to ingrown toenails, infection, or injury. 3. Resident 342's care plan was not developed and implemented to address oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to timely revise and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for two of ten sampled residents (Resident 31 and 67) when: 1. Resident 31's CP was not revise for his non-compliance with the use oxygen (O2). This failure put Resident 31 at risk of not receiving the appropriate oxygen administration and not having his oxygen needs met. 2. Resident 67's CP was not reviewed and revised to reflect the need to use prescription glasses. This failure resulted Resident 67's ability to maintain adequate vision and had the potential to increase risk for falls and limit functional independence. These failures resulted for Resident 31 not receiving oxygen as prescribed by the physician and Resident 67 decreased ability to maintain adequate vision which had the potential risk for falls and limit functional independence. Findings: 1. During an observation on 1/21/25 at 9:43 a.m. in Resident 31's room, Resident 31 was sleeping in bed. Resident 31…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled Residents (Resident 75) received toenail care consistent with professional standards of practice when Resident 75's toenails were long, yellow, hard thick, curled, and separated from the nail bed. This failure resulted in Resident 75's toenails to become long, curled, and painful which had the potential to lead to ingrown toenails, infection, or injury. Findings: During an interview on 1/21/25 at 9:41 a.m. with Resident 75, Resident 75 stated his toenails were long, falling off and painful. Resident 75 stated he told multiple Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) about the pain and discomfort his toenails caused him. Resident 75 stated no CNA, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN), or provider had assessed his toenails. During a review of Resident 75's admission Record (AR- document containing resident personal information), dated 9/26/24, the AR indicated, Resident 75 was admitted in the facility on 9/26/24, with diagnoses which included, Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that causes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record records, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services for all controlled medications (medications that have the potential for abuse or addiction) and non-control medications when periodic reconciliation (a process which validates that the controlled medication inventory amount on hand is what is expected) was not completed for all residents with standing and as needed orders for controlled medications. This failure resulted in inadequate record keeping ensuring accurate inventory of controlled medications, prompt identification or potential for diversion of controlled medications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/22/25 at 11:16 a.m., with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) in the Director of Nursing (DON) office, the controlled medication log sheets stored in a locked cabinet was reviewed. The controlled medication log sheets did not have periodic reconciliation. The ADON stated she was unsure if there was a process for doing periodic reconciliation for controlled medications. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the Pharmacy Consultant (PC) failed to identify and report to the facility irregularities related to: 1. Resident 16 's Hemoglobin (Hgb - protein found in red blood cells that is responsible for transporting oxygen throughout the body) levels was 8.1 to 8.3 gm/dL (grams per deciliter- unit of measure) for five months with no Hgb level goal. This failure had the potential risk for Resident 16 to experience tiredness and weakness with no intervention. 2. Resident 16, a kidney failure disease (-a long term disease that occurs when the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood properly) patient, was administered Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) 500 milligrams (mg- unit of measure) without Vitamin C blood monitoring. This failure had the potential risk for Resident 16 to result in toxicity from continued and unmonitored dose of Vitamin C administration. Findings: 1. During a record review of Resident 16's admission Record, dated 1/22/25, Resident 16' s' admission Record indicated, . Diagnosis information .Iron deficiency anemia (a condition where the body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform adequate lab monitoring, order medications without adequate indications for use for Resident 16 when: 1. Resident 16's Hemoglobin (Hgb - protein found in red blood cells that is responsible for transporting oxygen throughout the body) levels was 8.1 to 8.3 gm/dL (grams per deciliter- unit of measure) for five months with no Hgb level goal and Procrit [medication use to treat anemia- condition in which the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells or Hgb] medication was given to correct low Hgb levels without iron lab monitoring. This failure had the potential risk for Resident 16 to experience blood loss without adequate intervention. 2. Resident 16 received Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) without Vitamin C blood monitoring and dose. This failure had the potential risk for Resident 16 to result in toxicity from a continued and unmonitored dose of Vitamin C administration. Findings: 1. During a record review of the admission Record, dated 1/22/25, the admission Record indicated, . Diagnosis information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure two of two residents (Resident 43 and Resident 67) were free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affect brain activities with mental processes and behaviors) medications when: 1. Resident 43 was prescribed Aripiprazole (antipsychotic medication that helps treat mental health conditions) for behaviors of auditory hallucinations and delusions with no documentation of such behaviors; ineffective monitoring for behavior of sadness as evidence by no target goal for behavior care planned; ineffective monitoring for behaviors of distress; no non-pharmacological (behavioral) interventions were implemented for Bupropion (antidepressant medication). 2. Resident 67's Olanzapine (antipsychotic medication that alters brain chemistry to help reduce symptoms of the mind where there has been some loss of contact with reality) order was changed from as needed (prn) to routine on admission into the facility and no assessment was completed for a psychosis (a mental health condition characterized by a loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent when the facility's medication error rate was 11.11 percent. There were 27 opportunities for errors and three medication errors occurred for three of nine sampled residents (Resident 72, Resident 73, and Resident 70) when: 1. Resident 72's blood glucose (simple sugar - the body's primary source of energy from food) was assessed after Resident 72 began eating lunch. 2. Resident 73 was administered Olmesartan (medication used to lower blood pressure) and Resident 73's blood pressure was below ordered parameters. 3. Resident 70 was administered a medication not ordered by the physician. These failures in medication errors for Resident 72, Resident 73, and Resident 70, resulted in placing residents at risk for experiencing adverse side effects without adequate monitoring. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 1/21/25 at 12:06 p.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, LVN 3 was observed retrieving Resident 72 from the dining room and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with the facility policy and procedures when: 1. The room temperature for two of two medication storage rooms was not monitored. This failure had the potential risk for medications to be exposed in extreme temperatures which could alter the medication chemical composition and reduce shelf life. 2. Resident 40 and Resident 11 discontinued medications were stored in the west wing medication cart, and Resident 16's discontinued ointment medication was stored in the east wing treatment cart. This failure had the potential risk to result in a medication error. 3. Resident 27, Resident 36, Resident 343, Resident 9, Resident 59, Resident 62, Resident 42, Resident 20, Resident 5, Resident 54, and Resident 3's inhaler medications stored in the respiratory therapy (RT) cart did not have an open date label (the date when a medication was first open). This failure had the potential risk for license nurses to administer expired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 90 of 91 sampled residents when: 1. A towel and a pair of rubber gloves were found on the floor behind the 3-compartment wash station. 2. The stove top had caramel colored residue under the grill and pan supporter, dark shiny residue was on the grill, pan supporter and stove elements, and yellow particles sprinkled on the inner burners. 3. Four pieces of toasted bread were on the floor behind the toaster. 4. The resident refrigerator had food residue on the door shelving and ice buildup in the freezer. 5. The four tiles in front of the ice machine were cracked and broken with missing pieces which created an uneven surface and exposed a dark colored flooring. These failure had the potential to result in cross contamination (the unintentional transfer of bacteria from one substance or object with harmful effect) which could lead to food borne illness (a condition where a person becomes sick after consuming contaminated food) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete medical records in accordance with professional standards of practices for three of five sampled residents (Residents 31, 43, and 54) when the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a form that contains written medical orders for healthcare professionals regarding specific medical treatments that can or cannot be done at the end-of life) was not accurate and complete with section D - (physician/NP (Nurse Practitioner)/PA (Physician Assistant) License Number, NP Certificate Number, Physician/NP/PA Phone Number fields were not filled in, and the physician and the Resident or Resident Responsible Party (RP - legally recognized decision maker) signature and/or date fields were missing. These failure had the potential for Resident 31, 43, and 54's decisions regarding treatment options and end-of-life wishes to not be honored. Findings: During a review of Resident 31's admission Record (AR - a summary of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for four of 14 sampled residents (Residents 29, 31, 73 and 84) when: 1. Resident 29's urinary catheter (a flexible tube that drains urine from the bladder into a bag) bag was dragging on the ground while being pushed in his wheelchair. This failure placed Resident 29 at potential risk for cross contamination (the process by which bacteria or other microorganisms are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another, with harmful effect). 2. Resident 29's urinary catheter bag was laying on the floor. This failure placed Resident 29 at potential risk for cross contamination. 3. Resident 31's oxygen nasal cannula (O2 nasal cannula - a small plastic tube, which fits into the person's nostrils for providing supplemental oxygen) tubing was wrapped around the handle of his wheelchair, and his oxygen humidifier bottle (a sealed bottle of water that infuses moisture to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of the resident's transfer or discharge notification to the state long term care Ombudsman (resident advocacy agency) office for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 87) when Resident 87 was transferred to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH). This failure resulted for the long-term care Ombudsman not being aware of Resident 87's transfer and discharge circumstances should appeals be filed by the residents or their representative. Findings: During a review of Resident 87's Face Sheet (a summary of important information regarding a patient which include patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 1/24/25, the face sheet indicated, Resident 87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of muscle weakness (loss of muscle strength), end stage renal disease (the final stage of kidney disease where the kidneys can no longer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide written information to of the facility's bed hold policy for one of six sampled residents (Resident 16) when Resident 16 was not provided written information regarding the facility's bed hold policy upon his transfer to the hospital This failure violated the right of Resident 16 to be informed in writing of the facility's bed hold policy. Findings: During an interview on 1/24/25 at 9:21 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5, LVN 5 stated Resident 16 had not been notified in writing of the facility's bed hold policy. LVN 5 stated nurses only called him to notify him of the bed hold, no written policy was given to Resident 16. LVN 5 stated it was important to provide the bed hold policy so he could read it on his own time and ask questions. During an interview on 1/24/24 at 2:19 p.m. with the Business Office Manager, The BOM stated Resident 16 only received the bed hold policy in writing during his admission. The BOM stated since Resident 16 was a long-term resident business office staff did not feel the need to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for one of six sampled residents (Resident 342) when Resident 342's Oxygen (O2) therapy (a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas essential to living organisms) was not administered per the physician order and the O2 tubing (a thin, flexible tube with two prongs that fit into the nostrils and deliver oxygen) was not labeled when it was put into use allowing for tracking when it needs to be replaced to prevent bacterial contamination. This failure resulted in Resident 342 not receiving her oxygen therapy on 1/21/25 which could led to shortness of breath, fatigue, and the potential to developed respiratory infection from the use of contaminated O2 tubing. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/21/25 at 10:58 a.m. in Resident 342's room, Resident 342 was lying in bed, the O2 concentrator (medical device that helps residents/patients' breath) was turned off, and the nasal cannula O2 tubing was tucked underneath Resident 342's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for two of three sampled residents (Resident 20 and 65) when call lights were observed clipped to privacy curtains and out of reach. This failure had the potential for Resident 20 and 65 not to receive help when in need or in the event of an emergency. Findings: During a review of Resident 20's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes) dated 7/13/23, the AR indicated Resident 20 was readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis of: generalized muscle weakness, gait, and mobility abnormalities (abnormal pattern of foot movement and muscle coordination), and history of falling. During a review of Resident 20's Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment tool which indicated physical and cognitive abilities), dated 12/17/24, the MDS indicated a Brief Interview for Metal Status (BIMS- an assessment of cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services which met professional standards of practice for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 1) when license nurse did not administered Resident 1's physician's order for omeprazole (medication for gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD]-a condition which causes stomach acid to flow back into the esophagus [tube between the mouth and stomach]) 20 milligrams (mg- unit of measurement) for seven consecutive days and the physician was notified of the missed doses. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving the omeprazole on 5/1/24, 5/2/24, 5/4/24, 5/5/24, 5/6/24, 5/7/24, 5/8/24 and placed Resident 1 at potential risk to experience symptoms of GERD such as heartburn [burning sensation in the chest], sensation of a lump in the throat, chest pain, difficulty swallowing and nausea. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), undated, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure they periodically reassessed and documented a resident's mental capacity prior to allowing a resident to make life-sustaining treatment decisions for 1 (Resident #2) of 2 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility also failed to identify or arrange for an appropriate representative when Resident #2 was assessed as being unable to make health care decisions. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Advance Directives, revised in September 2022, revealed, The resident has the right to formulate an advance directive, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment. The policy revealed, If the resident is incapacitated and unable to receive information about his or her right to formulate an advance directive, the information may be provided to the residents [sic] legal representative. The policy revealed, The interdisciplinary team [IDT] assesses the residents [sic] decision-making capacity and identifies the primary decision-maker if the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to accurately assess and document a resident's status in the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, for 1 (Resident #66) of 3 residents reviewed who received dialysis. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment, revised in November 2019, revealed, Any person completing a portion of the Minimum Data Set/MDS (Resident Assessment Instrument) must sign and certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment. Further review of the section titled Policy Interpretation and Implementation revealed, 3. The information captured on the assessment reflects the status of the resident during the observation ('look-back') period for that assessment. A review of a facility policy titled Resident Assessments, revised in March 2022, revealed, All members who have completed any portion of the MDS resident assessment form must…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) worked at least eight consecutive hours a day on two (11/10/2023 and 11/11/2023) of the previous 30 days. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Departmental Supervision, Nursing, revised in August 2022, revealed, A registered nurse provides services at least eight (8) consecutive hours every 24 hours, seven (7) days a week. RNs may be scheduled more than eight (8) hours depending on the acuity needs of the resident. A review of a facility policy titled Staffing and Sufficient Nursing, revised in August 2022, revealed, A registered nurse provides services at least eight (8) consecutive hours every 24 hours, seven (7) days a week. RNs may be scheduled more than eight (8) hours depending on the acuity needs of the resident. A review of a document titled NHPPD [Nursing Hours Per Patient Day] Audit, for the timeframe from 11/05/2023 to 12/05/2023, revealed that RN Supervisor (RN-S) #2 clocked in at 6:52 AM on 11/10/2023 and clocked out at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F-689 S/S D Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who was a high risk for elopement (a patient who is incapable of adequately protecting himself, and who departs the healthcare facility unsupervised and undetected) when Resident 1 eloped from the facility on 9/6/23. This failure placed Resident 1's safety at risk for injuries when Resident 1 was found in a restaurant 8 miles away from the facility on 9/6/23. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (FS-a document which contains patient medical history and contact details), dated 9/2023, the FS indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia (progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning), Adult failure to thrive (a decline in older adults that manifest as a downward spiral of health and ability), muscle weakness, and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 1's Nursing-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-03-18 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to create a facility assessment specific to the need of facility population and location as part of the required facility assessment, when the facility assessment did not include the required water management program. This practice failed to establish an individualized facility assessment to meet the requirement for a water management program. Findings: During an interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), on 3/14/19, at 2 p.m., he stated the facility did not have a water management program in place. The MS stated he only checked the water temperature daily and emergency water supplies monthly for presence of minerals. MS stated he did not test for Legionella (disease is a severe, often lethal, form of pneumonia [lung inflammation caused by bacterial, in which the lung air sacs fill with pus], caused by the bacterium Legionella pneumophila found in both potable and non-potable water systems [showers, sinks and water fountains]). The MS stated, I do not have an emergency plan in placed if a water test comes out positive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Policy and Procedure on infectious diseases when they failed to have an infection control program that was effective in identification of infections and communicable diseases when: 1. Twenty of 51 sampled residents (Resident 6, 16, 18, 21, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 50, 64, 67, 74, 282, 283, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291) received Tamiflu (an antiviral medication) prophylactically (preventive use) following one resident exhibiting symptoms of influenza (a highly contagious viral infection of the respiratory passages causing fever, severe aching) (flu) without documented surveillance and tracking. This resulted in the inadequate surveillance of 20 residents for flu like symptoms. 2. Nine of 9 sampled residents (Resident 18, 26, 31, 50, 286, 287, 288, 289 and 290) required hospitalization in a ten-day period for metapneumovirus (hMPV) (a respiratory virus that caused an upper respiratory infection and affected the nose, throat, and airways);…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their Storage of Medication and Labeling of Medication Containers policy and procedure when three of three insulin solution pens (medication used to treat high blood sugar) were found expired and one vial of tuberculin solution (a protein derivative to test for tuberculosis, a bacterial infection affecting the lungs) was found with no expiration date in the medication storage room refrigerator. These failures had the potential to place Resident 55, 74 and 30 at risk of receiving expired insulin which could lead to ineffective control of blood sugar and place residents at risk of receiving expired tuberculin solution and have adverse reactions from the expired medication. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, on 3/13/19, at 2:45 p.m., the [NAME] Wing medication cart had insulin Basaglar injection flex pen (insulin with injection device) labeled with an open date of 2/9/19 and expiration date of 3/11/19. RN 1 stated the insulin had expired two days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. Dietary staff (DS) 1 failed to have a hair net covering which completely covered all hair while in the kitchen. 2. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 3 touched the inside rim of a resident's cup while distributing a food tray. These failures had the potential to contaminate residents food and spread infection. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with DS 1, on 3/13/19, at 8:55 a.m., in the kitchen, DS 1 had on a hair net which covered her hair bun and left approximately four inches of hair showing on all sides while working in the kitchen. DS 1 stated the facility did not have hair nets large enough to cover all her hair. DS 1 stated not having a hair net that covered all of her hair could lead to hair falling into residents' food and contaminating the food. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), on 3/13/19, at 8:55 a.m., in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-03-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to effectively implement an antibiotic stewardship program when the Infection Preventionist (IP) failed to monitor and address the use of antibiotics when the resident's condition did not meet the facility McGeer Criteria (a program used to identify signs and symptoms with an aim to reduce unnecessary prescribing for the three infections where antibiotics are most frequently prescribed in nursing homes: urinary tract infections (UTIs), lower respiratory tract infections, and skin and soft tissue infections) and when the physician was not notified after the infection did not meet criteria for infection and use of antibiotic continued. This failure had the potential for antibiotics to be used when it was not indicated and the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), on 3/14/19, at 10 a.m., she reviewed the document titled, Infection Prevention and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure eligible residents were provided with Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN) (a notice a provider gives after receiving services based on Medicare, Federal funded program that covers skilled nursing facility) in writing for one of three sampled residents (Resident 6). This deficient practice failed to provide Resident 6 with timely notice of non-coverage and an opportunity to appeal the denial of Medicare part A benefits. Findings: During a clinical record review for Resident 6, the Facesheet (a document which includes admission dates, contact details and a brief medical history) indicated Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE]. During a clinical record review for Resident 6, the start date for her Medicare part A stay was 8/22/18. The last covered day for Medicare benefits was on 10/2/19. The Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) letter was signed on 10/1/19 by Resident 6. During a concurrent interview and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person centered care plan for one of six sampled residents (Resident 67) when there was no care plan to address Resident 67's refusal to accept laboratory blood draws ordered by the physician. This failure placed Resident 67 at risk of not receiving appropriate, consistent, and individualized care interventions to ensure his well-being. Findings: During an observation on 3/12/19, at 8:30 a.m., in the resident's room, Resident 67 was lying in bed on his back asleep. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 67, the admission Record (document containing resident's personal information) dated 3/14/19, indicated Resident 67 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a concurrent interview and record review with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 8, on 3/13/19, at 2:32 p.m., LVN 8 reviewed Resident 67's Medication Review Report, dated 3/14/19, and stated Resident 67 physician gave orders on 11/27/18 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to provide services to attain or maintain the highest practical well-being for one of six sampled residents (Resident 67) when the facility failed to notify the physician of Resident 67's refusal of laboratory blood tests. This failure had the potential risk of Resident 67 not receiving the appropriate care and possible adverse side effects to medications requiring routine laboratory monitoring. Findings: During on observation on 3/12/19, at 8:30 a.m., in the resident's room, Resident 67 was lying in bed on his back asleep. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 67, the admission Record, (document containing resident's personal information) indicated Resident 67 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a concurrent interview and record review with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 8, on 3/13/19, at 2:32 p.m., she reviewed Resident 67's Medication Review Report, dated 3/14/19, and stated Resident 67 had a physician's order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate documentation for one of one sampled residents (Resident 74) when Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) continued to document hearing aids being used after the hearing aids were reported missing. This failure had the potential to delay the replacement of Resident 74's lost hearing aids and potential risk of Resident 74 to experience isolation and depression from not being able to adequately hear. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Family Member (FM) 1, on 3/12/19, at 9:06 a.m., in Resident 74's room, FM 1 stated the facility had lost Resident 74's hearing aids. Resident 74 was observed sitting in her wheel chair without her hearing aids. During a concurrent interview and record review with the Social Service Director (SSD), on 03/14/19, at 10:39 a.m., in the SSD office, she stated Resident 74's hearing aids went missing on 2/8/19. The SSD stated Resident 74 had an audiology appointment on 2/25/19 and a follow-up appointment was scheduled for 3/25/19 for new hearing aids.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview during the survey period from 1/21/25 through 1/24/25, the facility failed to ensure each bedroom had 80 square feet of usable living space for residents in four different rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]). Findings: Throughout the survey period from 1/21/25 through 1/24/25 four resident bedrooms had more than three residents in each bedroom. Rooms 106, room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] had four residents per room and had less than 80 square feet for each resident. Although the bedrooms accommodated less than 80 square feet for each resident, each room met the required needs of the residents. The residents had a reasonable amount of privacy, and closet and storage space was adequate. Bedside stands were available. There was sufficient room for nursing care and for the mobility of the residents. Wheelchairs, devices, and toilet facilities were accessible. The health and safety of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-12-05 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure daily staffing information postings contained all required information, including the total number and actual hours worked by registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs), or licensed vocational nurses (LVNs), and certified nursing assistants (CNAs), and the resident census for each shift. This was noted during the review of daily staff postings for the timeframe from 11/01/2023 through 12/04/2023 and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, revised in August 2022, revealed, Our facility will post on a daily basis for each shift nursing staffing data, including the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents. The section of the policy titled Policy Interpretation and Implementation specified, 1. Within (2) two hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of licensed nurses (RNs, LPNs, and LVNs) and the number of unlicensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet per resident in four of four multiple occupancy resident rooms (Rooms 106, 108, 110, and 119). This failure had the potential to decrease resident freedom of mobility and could compromise the provision of care. Findings included: Observations of resident rooms during the initial tour of the facility on 12/03/2023 and each day of the survey from 12/03/2023 to 12/05/2023 revealed there were four multiple occupancy resident rooms (Rooms 106, 108, 110, and 119) with four residents residing in each room. During an interview on 12/05/2023 at 10:00 AM, the Environmental Services Director (ESD) stated he measured the square footage in each room on 12/05/2023 at 9:45 AM. A review of a document provided by the ESD on 12/05/2023 revealed measurements of the square footage in each room were not at least 80 square feet per resident, as indicated below: - room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 318.3 square footage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2019-03-18 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide the minimum square footage in four resident rooms (rooms 106, 108, 110 and 119) of at least 80 square feet per resident. This failure had the potential to decrease resident freedom of mobility and could compromise provision of care. Findings: During an observation of the room and review with Maintenance Supervisor (MS), on 3/14/19, at 10:49 a.m., the MS measured Rooms 106, 108, 109 and 119. The residents had a reasonable amount of privacy. Closets and storage space were adequate. Bedside stands were available. There was sufficient room for nursing care and resident to ambulate. Wheelchairs and toilet facilities were accessible. The health and safety of the residents would not be adversely affected by this waiver. Room Square Footage No. of Beds 106 318.3 sq. ft. 4 108 295.1 sq. ft. 4 110 300.2 sq. ft. 4 119 317.0 sq. ft. 4 We recommend a room waiver. ______________________________________ Health Facilities Evaluator Supervisor II Date We request a room waiver. ______________________________________ Administrator Date

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PROVIDENCE GROUP NORTH LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2016
GROSSMAN, STEPHENIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/02/2015
BENNETT, PARKERIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2023
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$684K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 12%Medicare 29%Other / private 58%

This home reported $684K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$399per resident / day
operating cost
$12,125per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$429per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056288. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next