No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

San Jacinto Valley Post Acute

275 North San Jacinto Street, Hemet, CA 92543 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (951) 658-9441 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (951) 658-9441 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Jan 2026
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (27% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
301 N San Jacinto St · (951) 765-1712 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1003 E Devonshire Ave · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1470 E Florida Ave · (951) 766-8819 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Acacia Park Hemet California · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.7%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.8%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.3%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.4%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.4%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.7%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.0%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.2%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.6%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.5%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.0%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.282.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.131.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 97 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.59U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.28hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.4%CMS range 51.8–65.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 5.8–12.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge77.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge81.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 3.6–9.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.211.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
0.85
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.56
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.94
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
26.6%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 93.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-30)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an exit door (EXD 1), located along (name of street), was readily accessible and unobstructed for 24 of 24 residents when the door handles were secured with a zip tie.This failure resulted in an obstructed exit door and had the potential to result in a delay or prevent the residents from exiting the facility during an emergency, such as a fire.Findings:On April 14, 2026, at 10:07 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview, Resident 1 was awake and alert, sitting in his wheelchair near EXD 1. Resident 1 stated EXD 1 used to be the main entrance. Resident 1 stated he observed EXD 1 door handles were zip tied on two separate occasions. Resident 1 stated on the first occurrence, the door handles were secured with three zip ties; he could not remember when. The second occurrence was two days ago, when a black zip tie was on the door handles, which was later removed by a maintenance staff. Resident 1 stated they are not supposed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement, review, and re-evaluate care plan interventions to prevent falls two of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 20 and Resident 86).This failure resulted in Resident 20 and Resident 86 experiencing multiple falls and had the potential for Resident 20 and Resident 86 to sustain avoidable injuries. Findings:On January 26, 2026, at 3:59 p.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 20. Resident 20 was observed alert and oriented, in a low bed with floor mat, receiving gastrostomy (medical device inserted into the stomach for administering formula, fluids, and medication) feeding. Resident 20 stated he fell out of bed attempting to go to the restroom.Resident 20's medical record was reviewed.Resident 20 was admitted into the facility on July 21, 2025, with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, gastrotomy, and encephalopathy (brain dysfunction).The history and physical dated July 22, 2025, indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure provision of safe and effective pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of the residents when: Medications with holding parameters were not administered according to the physician's orders for three of four reviewed residents (Resident 2, 3, and 109) on blood pressure (BP) medications. This failure had the potential to significantly lower blood pressure to cause dizziness, confusion, fainting and a fall.Findings: 1. On January 28, 2026, a review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 2's Care Plan Report, dated October 24, 2025, indicated, Resident has a diagnosis of hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure) and is at risk for chest pain, decreased blood pressure, dizziness, edema (swelling in parts of body).Administer medication as ordered.Monitor blood pressure as ordered and PRN (as needed).Observe for signs and symptoms of abnormal blood pressure.and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications in accordance with the facility policy and procedures (P&P) and manufacturer's specifications when: 1. One expired house supply medication (medications kept for general use for residents, rather than dispensed or labeled for a specific resident) was stored in one of two reviewed medication rooms (North Medication Room); and2. An expired medication was kept in stock in one of five reviewed medication carts (Middle Medication Cart) along with other active medications. These failures had the potential for the residents to receive expired or ineffective medications, which could lead to medication errors and compromised treatment outcomes.Findings: 1. On January 26, 2026, at 2:43 p.m., during an inspection of North Medication Room with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, an expired unopened bottle of glucosamine sulfate (dietary supplement) 750 mg (milligram - unit of measurement) was observed stored in the medication cabinet with other house supply medications. The bottle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items readily available for use were stored in the freezer with a label of open date or expiration date. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illness to a vulnerable facility population.Findings:On January 26, 2026, at 1:46 p.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with the Dietary Supervisor (DS). One whole piece of roast beef (approx. 7 lbs.) was observed in the freezer, readily available for use. The roast beef was observed with no open date, no use-by date, and no expiration date. The DS stated all items stored in the refrigerator or the freezer should have a label of open date, a use-by date, or an expiration date. The DS stated the roast beef should not have been stored in the freezer without a label and it should have been discarded. The facility policy and procedure titled, Labeling and Dating of Foods, dated 2023, was reviewed. The policy and procedure indicated, .All food items in the storeroom, refrigerator, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five sampled residents (Residents 3 and 105) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic (drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications when: 1. For Resident 3, Mirtazapine (Antidepressant medication used to treat depression) was prescribed with an indication of Depression without physician-documented clinical evidence supporting a diagnosis of depression; and 2. For Resident 105, the physician did not document the clinical rationale for continued use of the as-needed temazepam (a psychotropic medication used for inability to fall asleep) beyond 14 days. This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary use of psychotropic medications, and increased risk for adverse effects, including falls or sedation.Findings: 1. On January 29, 2026, a review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess one of 19 residents (Resident 14) reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) to reflect the resident's status when Resident 14's MDS assessment had a diagnosis of schizophrenia (a mental illness characterized by disturbances in thought process) without a psychiatric evaluation.This failure had the potential for Resident 14 to receive inappropriate care and services.Findings:On January 26, 2026, at 2:52 p.m., Resident 14 was observed lying in bed, awake and alert. Resident 14 stated she was ok and did not want to be bothered.A review of Resident 14's PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federal assessment requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide the appropriate care), conducted at the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on November 3, 2025, prior to facility admission was reviewed. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents reviewed (Resident 2) was free of unnecessary medications, when pain assessments were not consistently implemented and documented in conjunction with the administration of scheduled narcotic pain medication. This failure resulted in unmonitored medical condition and had the potential for ineffective pain management, unnecessary excessive dosing, and adverse effects for Resident 2. Findings: On January 28, 2026, a review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic pain syndrome, polyneuropathy (nerve damage causing pain or numbness), multiple sclerosis (a disease affecting the brain and spinal cord), paraplegia (paralysis of the lower body), Parkinson's disease (a neurological disorder affecting movement), spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spaces in spine causing pain), stage 4 pressure ulcer (deep open wound), muscle wasting and atrophy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a safe discharge for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who uses a wheelchair and required partial to moderate assistance with mobility and ADLs (Activities of Daily Living-basic self-care task such as bathing, dressing, toileting, getting in and out of bed), when the facility failed to assess the resident for appropriate discharge placement. The resident was discharged to a two-story room and board without personal care assistance and was given a bedroom on the second floor. The facility also failed to verify and ensure the receiving facility could meet the resident's care needs. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sleeping in the dining room without privacy, experiencing multiple falls and had caused psychological distress (state of mental and emotional discomfort characterized by negative feelings). The resident was eventually transferred to the general acute care hospital (GACH) due to inability of the room and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system of safeguarding personal belongings, such as bank card and Identification (ID) card, were in place, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure resulted to unauthorized bank transactions on Resident 1's bank cards while at the facility without her knowledge. Findings: On April 14, 2025, at 9:20 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to investigate a facility reported incident regarding Resident 1 ' s missing ID Card and bank card with unauthorized transactions. On April 14, 2025, at 10:37 a.m., an interview was conducted with Social Worker 1 (SW 1). SW 1 stated during a resident's admission, an inventory list of personal belongings were conducted by the facility staff. SW 1 stated she was then notified by the staff if the resident had a cash money or bank and/or debit cards in their possession. SW 1 stated she would then let the resident know that the facility ' s safe can be used to store their valuables or personal belongings of value. SW 1 stated was aware Resident 1 had bank cards…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of two residents, Resident 1, a medication ordered by the doctor was given as prescribed. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have hypokalemia (low potassium level in the blood) which could cause Resident 1 to experience muscle cramps and abnormal heart rhythms. Findings: On January 22, 2024, at 9:28 a.m., at the north unit of the facility, a med pass (administration of medications) observation was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1. LVN 1 prepared Resident 1 ' s medications which included potassium chloride. LVN 1 placed the box of potassium chloride oral packets, which were labeled for Resident 1 and dated October 24, 2024, on top of the medication cart. LVN 1 removed one oral potassium chloride packet from the box, prepared it, and administered it to Resident 1. A review of Resident 1 ' s medical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included stroke…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention protocols were implemented, for two of two residents, Residents 1 and 2, when a facility staff member did not perform hand hygiene in between residents ' care, and did not disinfect the automatic blood pressure cuff (BP cuff) before and after residents ' use. These failures had the potential for the vulnerable residents to be exposed to cross-contamination and the development of infections. Findings: On January 22, 2024, at 9:24 a.m., a medication pass was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1. LVN 1 carried an automatic BP cuff machine from the top of the medication cart and went to Resident 1 ' s room. LVN 1 applied the BP cuff to Resident 1 ' s left wrist. After obtaining Resident 1 ' s BP reading, LVN 1 removed the automatic BP cuff from Resident 1 ' s wrist and place it on top of the medication cart. LVN 1 did not perform hand hygiene and did not disinfect the automatic BP cuff machine after use on Resident 1. LVN 1 prepared Resident 1 ' s medications, went back to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of four residents reviewed for urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine), the urinary catheter drainage bag was covered with a dignity bag (a bag that covers and holds a catheter drainage to keep it out of sight). This failure resulted in violation of Resident 37's rights to be treated with dignity and respect. Findings: On November 4, 2024, at 10:17 a.m., Resident 37 was observed with the urinary catheter drainage bag not covered with a dignity bag. On November 4, 2024, at 10:20 a.m., during an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, she stated there should be a dignity bag over the urinary catheter drainage bag. CNA 1 stated not covering the drainage bag could cause embarrassment to the resident. On November 4, 2024, at 10:25 a.m., during an interview with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, she stated the dignity bag should be placed over the urinary catheter drainage bag. LVN 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan for the care of resident's surgical site and left hip dressing was initiated and developed for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 141). This failure had the potential for Resident 141 not to receive the necessary care and services if the surgical site developed infection and/or the resident experienced other complications. Findings: On November 4, 2024, at 12:15 p.m., Resident 141 was observed awake, alert, lying in bed. Resident 141 stated she fell at home and broke her left hip. She stated she had left hip surgery. Resident 141 stated the surgeon applied a special type of dressing and it should not be removed for seven days. On November 5, 2024, a record review was conducted for Resident 141. Resident 141 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included fracture of the left hip. The history and physical (H&P) indicated Resident 141 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for two (Residents 45 and 12) of 19 residents reviewed, when: 1. For Resident 45, one opened tube of Voltaren cream (medication used to treat arthritis pain) and one opened bottle of Magnesium Ashwagandha tablets (a medication that supports mental health and sleep) were observed on top of the resident's bedside table; and 2. For Resident 12, one opened bottle of Calcium Carbonate (medication used to relieve heartburn, acid indigestion, and stomach upset) was observed on top of the resident's bedside table. These failures had the potential for Residents 45 and 12 to receive medications without a physician's order. Findings: 1. On November 4, 2024, at 11:46 a.m., Resident 45 was observed lying in bed. One opened tube of Voltaren cream and one opened bottle of Magnesium Ashwagandha tablets were observed on top of Resident 45's bedside table. During a concurrent interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of 19 residents (Resident 66) reviewed who smoked in the facility did not have a lighter in her possession. This failure had the potential to result in injury or accident related to unsupervised smoking. Findings: On November 14, 2024, at 10:54 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 66, Resident 66 was brought back to her room in a wheelchair by a facility staff. Resident 66 stated she smokes four times a day and just came back from the smoking patio. Resident 66 stated she was allowed to keep her smoking materials with her and pulled out a pack of cigarettes and a lighter from her pocket. An oxygen concentrator (a machine that supplies oxygen) was observed at Resident 66's bedside. Resident 66 stated she used oxygen during the night. Resident 66 stated she was aware not to smoke in her room. On November 6, 2024, at 12:15 p.m., during an interview with the Activities Director (AD), the AD stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were not stored in the refrigerator, readily available for use. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illness to an already vulnerable facility population. Findings: On November 4, 2024, at 9:55 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Dietary Supervisor (DS). A one gallon size pitcher of water, that was almost full, dated 11/3/24, was observed in the refrigerator, readily available for use. In a concurrent interview, the DS stated the water was used for residents who preferred cold water and 11/3/24 was the use-by-date. The DS stated the water should have been discarded on or before the use-by-date. Additionally, a one-gallon pitcher with a thickened liquid, approximately a quarter-full, dated 10/30/24, was observed in the refrigerator, readily available for use. In a concurrent interview, the DS stated the liquid in the pitcher was used for residents who are on a diet with thick liquids and 10/30/24 was the use-by-date. The DS stated the thickener…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were implemented for three of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 69, 86, and 140) when: 1. For Resident 69, the hand held nebulizer mouthpiece (a device that contains medication that turns into a mist) was left exposed on top of the bedside table near the resident's urinal; 2. For Resident 86, the Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP - infection control practices that use gowns and gloves to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms) was not followed when the resident was admitted with the colostomy (an operation in which a piece of the colon is diverted to an artificial opening in the abdomen that allows stool to pass through); and 3. For Resident 140, the Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) was not wearing a gown when performing physical therapy exercises at the resident's bedside. Resident 140 was identified for EBP. These failures had the potential to increase the risk for cross…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure the resident's representative was informed of an incident of fall for one of six resident reviewed (Resident C). This failure has the potential to result in the resident's representative to be unaware of the resident's condition which could delay the involvement of the representative in planning the care for their family member (Resident C). Findings: On May 24, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a complaint of quality of care. On May 28, 2024, Resident C ' s medical record was reviewed. Resident C was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Myocardial Infarction (heart attack) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood). A review of Resident C ' s SBAR (stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation- a form used to communicate)/Summary for Providers, dated for May 15/2024, at 7:15 a.m., indicated .falls .CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident D) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers/injuries (PU/PI-localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence resulting from intense or prolonged pressure), received care and services consistent with professional standards of practice, when the status of the pressure injuries, which included measurements, were not consistently documented. In addition, the facility failed to ensure provision of wound treatment was coordinated with the wound care team. These failures have the potential to result in inconsistent provision of wound treatment which could contribute to the delayed healing of the resident's pressure injuries. Findings: On May 24, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a complaint related to quality of care. On May 24, 2024, Resident D's medical record was reviewed. Resident D was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was transferred with two person assist using the Hoyer lift (a portable total patient lifting tool to assist in transferring patients in and out of bed), from his Geri-chair (a large padded chair that can recline and is used for people with limited mobility), to bed. This failure had the potential to result in an injury to Resident 1. Findings: On March 19, 2024, at 10:59 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was condcuted to investigate quality care issues. A review of Resident 1's medical records indicated he was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included CVA (cerebral vascular accident – stroke), affecting left side non-dominate, depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), diabetes mellitus type 2 (a chronic condition that affects the way the body uses sugar. The body either resists the effects of insulin — a hormone that regulates the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety requirements for food storage and preparation were followed when: - Multiple food items stored in the dry storage area and refrigerator were not labeled with the opened date, or use-by date, and expired food was available for resident use; - Thawing meat in the refrigerator was not labeled with the start and end date of thawing; - The facility log for the dish machine (dish washer) temperatures were not documented for 14 out of 79 entries; and - Two of the five kitchen food carts (large carts used to transport resident food to the floor for meal service) were observed with peeling duct tape. These failures had the potential to place the residents of the facility at risk for food-borne illness in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food in the facility. Facility census was 95. Findings: On February 27, 2024, at 11:25 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for a complaint allegation. On February 27, 2024, at 11:33 a.m., a kitchen tour was conducted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 3), professional standards of practice were followed when the facility practice for hospice services (focused care for end-of-life) evaluation was not conducted prior to the resident ' s discharge with hospice services. This failure had the potential for Resident 3 ' s family to not fully understand hospices services, and to potentially experience emotional distress. Findings: On January 30, 2024, at 10:35 a.m., an announced visit was conducted at the facility for a complaint investigation. On January 30, 2024, Resident 3 ' s medical record was reviewed. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure (sudden and chronic lung condition that makes it hard to breath), sepsis (severe blood infection), vascular dementia (brain damage caused by multiple strokes), cardiac arrhythmia (irregular heartbeat) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure discharge planning activities were conducted and documented for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 4). This failure had the potential to result for a delay in achieving Resident 4 ' s discharge goal. Findings: On January 19, 2024, at 1:04 p.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted for an investigation of a complaint. On January 19, 2024, at 1:44 p.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 4. Resident 4 was in his room, sitting on his bed, alert and oriented. Resident 4 stated he did not receive assistance from the facility to find housing. On January 19, 2024, Resident 4 ' s record was reviewed. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Diabetes Mellitus (high blood sugar levels), Hypertension (high blood pressure) and Anemia (low blood oxygen levels). The Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool) dated November 1, 2023, indicated Resident 4 ' s cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the faciity failed to provide quality of care when: 1. The facility failed to ensure a change of condition (COC) was completed, monitoring done, and the care plan updated and/or revised for two of eight residents reviewed (Resident 1 and 2), when Resident 1 and 2 appeared to be intoxicated on December 14, 2023. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 and 2 to not be adequately monitored for safety risks, and possible medication(s) interactions. 2. The facility failed to accommodate the need for one of one resident, Resident 5, when a bariatric chair (specialized seating) was not available for his use. This failure had the potential for Resident 5 to be at risk for further decline in mobility. Findings: On January 30, 2024, at 10:35 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility. On January 30, 2024, at 12:23 p.m., Resident 1 was observed sitting on his bed. During a concurrent interview, Resident 1 stated he had a history of alcohol use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the restorative nurse assistant (RNA) exercises were provided for two of three sampled residents, Resident 4 and 5 when: 1. Rehabilitation therapists ' recommendations for Resident 4 were not communicated to the nursing department and the RNA. 2. Resident 5 did not receive RNA exercises on January 15 and 31, 2024 and February 1, 2, 5 and 7, 2024. These failures had the potential for Resident 4 and 5 to have a decline of range of motion. On February 8, 2024, at 10:26 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to the facility for an investigation of three complaints. Findings: 1. On February 8, 2024, at 10:26 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 4 in her room. Resident 4 was lying in bed, alert. Resident 4 stated she did not receive any exercises after her skilled therapy ended. A review of Resident 4's record was conducted and indicated that Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 ' s foley catheter care was not provided every shift. This failure has the potential for an increased risk of recurrence of infection for Resident 1. Findings: On December 6, 2023, at 11:00 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a complaint allegation. On December 6, 2023, Resident 1 ' s record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include Urinary Tract Infection, Anemia (the body does not have enough red blood cells), Atrial Fibrillation (irregular and rapid heart rhythm), Heart Failure (the heart doesn ' t pump enough blood), Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3 (kidneys are damaged), Anxiety (mental illness), Depression (mental illness), and Unstageable Pressure Injury of Sacral Region (breakdown of skin due to pressure at the bottom of the spine). The Minimum Data Assessment (MDS –…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based interview and record review the facility failed to administer three routine medications (Quetiapine Fumarate, Mirtazapine, and Lactulose) on August 9, 2023, in accordance with the policy and procedure for one of four sampled residents. This failure had the potential to result in harm to Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included respiratory failure, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease- chronic respiratory distress- a condition that makes it difficult to oxygenate), diabetes mellitus (inability to regulate blood sugar) and dementia (loss of cognitive functioning- thinking, remembering, and reasoning). A review of Resident 1's physician orders for August 2023, indicated the resident had orders for the following: a. Quetiapine Fumarate (antipsychotic medication) 300 mg (milligram- a unit of measure), 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for bipolar disorder (mental illness that causes unusual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure undated/unlabeled and expired food items were not stored in the refrigerator, readily available for use. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illness to an already vulnerable facility population. Findings: On June 6, 2022, at 9:47 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Food Service Supervisor (FSS). One open bag of tofu (one piece of approximately half a pound of tofu) was observed in the refrigerator, readily available for use. The tofu bag had a date of May 31, 2022. In a concurrent interview, the FSS stated the May 31, 2022 label represented the date the tofu bag was opened. The FSS stated the facility did not have storage guidelines specific for tofu. He stated the tofu should not have been stored in the refrigerator past five days from the opening date and should have been discarded. Additionally, a container of dough was observed in the freezer, readily available for use. The dough did not have a label indicating an open date or a use by date (expiration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory services according to professional standards of practice when: 1. The licensed nurses administered oxygen without the oxygen flow rate specified in the physician's orders for 14 shifts, from June 3, 2022, to June 8, 2022, for one of four residents reviewed for oxygen use (Resident 212). This failure had the potential for Resident 212 to receive ineffective or unnecessary oxygen therapy. 2. The facility did not change the oxygen nasal cannula (NC - a tube used to deliver oxygen through the nose) and oxygen set-up bag, for two of four residents reviewed for oxygen use (Residents 1 and 50). This failure had the potential for bacterial growth in the NC, which could cause respiratory infections in Residents 1 and 50. Findings: 1. On June 6, 2022, at 12 p.m., Resident 212 was observed awake, sitting up in bed, and conversant. Resident 212 was observed wearing a NC connected to a concentrator (a machine converting room air to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the professional principles on storing medications when: 1. One bottle of antifungal powder, dated May 11, 2022, was found on Resident 49's nightstand and there was no physician's order for use. This failure had the potential for Resident 49 to receive antifungal powder unnecessarily. 2a. One tube of Santyl ointment (medication that removes dead tissue from wounds so they can start to heal) labeled for a discharged resident was found stored in the treatment cart readily available for use; and 2b. One bottle of Narcan (medication used for the treatment of a known or suspected use of opioid [medication used mostly to relieve pain] overdose) nasal spray labeled for a discharged resident was found stored in the medication cart readily available for use. These failures had the potential for the discontinued medications for discharged residents to be available for use by other residents. Findings: 1. On June 6, 2022, at 11:40 a.m., a bottle of antifungal powder, dated May 11, 2022, was found on Resident 49's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection prevention and control was practiced when: 1. One dirty bedpan was found on the floor in Resident 49's room; and 2. Resident 49's CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure - a common treatment for obstructive sleep apnea [breathing stops temporarily]) machine was not cleaned since his admission on [DATE]. These failures had the potential to increase the risk of bacterial growth, cross-contamination, and infections. Findings: 1. On June 6, 2022, at 11:40 a.m., a dirty bed pan was observed on the floor in the corner of Resident 49's room. On June 7, 2022, at 9:27 a.m., a dirty bed pan was observed on the floor in the corner of Resident 49's room. On June 8, 2022, at 10 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA). The CNA stated the bed pan should not be left on the floor. The CNA stated the bed pan should be kept clean and stored in the resident's drawer or closet. On June 8, 2022, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 52.9+2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
TRUIST BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 12/07/2023
AGUDA, CHERRYLYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/19/2024
APT, FREDERICKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024
BOYACK, BRENNANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/23/2026
GANTA, SANYASIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/23/2026
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024
PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/15/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$388K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 4%Medicare 16%Other / private 81%

This home reported $388K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$388per resident / day
operating cost
$11,803per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$434per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055223. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next