Highland Palms Healthcare Center
7534 Palm Ave, Highland, CA 92346 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (909) 862-0611 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 28.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.4% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.5% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 18.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 1.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.4% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.93 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.95 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 121 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 114 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.1%CMS range 41.9–58.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.9%CMS range 8.4–15.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 69.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 49.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.0%CMS range 5.3–13.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.60 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 91.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen when the walk-in refrigerator had a wet box containing cold cut meat sitting on top of a thawing roast beef inside the container.This failure had the potential to cause food borne illness (illnesses contracted from eating contaminated food or beverages) to 91 of 91 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen.During a concurrent observation and interview on April 27, 2026, at 9:08 AM, with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), in the kitchen, the walk-in refrigerator was inspected. There was a wet box thawing inside a plastic container. When DS lifted the wet box, a thawed roast beef under was observed. DS opened the contents of the wet box and stated the box contained cold meat. and it was sitting on top of the thawing roast beef.During a follow up interview with DS on April 27, 2026, at 3:20 PM, DS stated, the box contains individually rapid cold cuts. DS stated, the cold cut should have been taken out of the box and placed on a pan.During a concurrent interview and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control and prevention practices for two of four sampled residents (Resident 36 and 122) when:1.Resident 122's foley catheter bag (a drainage unit attached to an indwelling catheter to collect urine) was on the floor, while Resident 122 was in the dining room. 2.One Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) carried pre-prepared Intravenous medication (IV- into the vein) in his scrub pocket before administering it through a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line - a very long thin flexible tube inserted into the large vein in the upper arm and threaded to a vessel just above the heart) to one vulnerable resident (Resident 36). These failures had the potential for compromising 91 vulnerable residents' health and safety, placing them at risk for infectious disease which may result in illness and adverse health outcomes. During a review of Resident 122's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical records (documentation used to show that ordered treatments and care were provided) for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 10) reviewed for treatment orders when monitoring and care for indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine that requires routine care and monitoring) and APP mattress (a special air mattress used to prevent skin breakdown that requires routine monitoring to ensure proper function) were not documented for multiple days from March 2026 through April, 2026.This failures had the potential to result in unverified treatment orders, lack of continuity for care, and increase for adverse outcomes, including infection, skin breakdown, and decline in residents conditions.During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated, Resident 10, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Electronic Health Records (EHR- medical records kept on a computer system) was kept secure for one of five sampled residents (Resident 132), when a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) left Resident 132's health information on the computer screen unattended and visible to the public in the hallway.This failure had the potential to place Resident 132's confidential information at risk of disclosure to unauthorized individuals.During a concurrent observation and interview on April 29, 2026, at 09:25 AM, with the LVN 2, the LVN 2 logged into the computer on top of the medication cart, checked Resident 132's EHR, and prepared the medication. LVN 2 then proceeded to go inside room [ROOM NUMBER] without logging off the computer, and administered the medications. Resident 132's information was left open and accessible on top of a medication cart. When asked, LVN 2 stated she was not supposed to keep the computer unattended. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure its policy and procedure (P&P) for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- a screening assessment to ensure individuals who are identified to have a significant mental illness [SMI] or intellectual/developmental [I/DD] disability are appropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) was followed for one out of six residents (Resident 51) when Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) assessed and documented the level 1 PASARR incorrectly.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 51's condition not being identified prior to admission and the needs for treatment and services not being accurately assessed, placing Resident 51 at risk for unmet mental health needs.During a record review on April 28, 2026, at 8 :44 AM, facility's electronic documents titled PASARR, dated December 20, 2025, was reviewed. The PASARR indicated, Resident 51 level 1 screening for serious mental illness (SMI- major mental disorder) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured to prevent unauthorized access when one of four medication carts (Medication cart 1), was unattended and unlocked in a common area accessible to residents, staff, and visitors.This failure had the potential to result in medications being accessible, diverted, or used inappropriately by unauthorized individuals.During an observation on April 29, 2026 at 5:59 AM, medication cart 1, was observed unattended and unlocked. The cart was parked directly in front of the Nurses' Station I near the main entrance of the building, an area accessible to residents, staff, and visitors. The medication cart contained eight drawers. On the top of the cart, there was a binder labeled Station I Narcotic & Antibiotic Record. The License Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) was observed down the hallway administering medications, leaving the cart unsecured, and unattended.During a concurrent observation and interview on April 29, 2026, at 6:02 AM, with the facility Consultant 1, (C1), C1 walked by Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse involving one of four sampled residents (Resident 1).This failure prevented the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) from ensuring the facility was taking appropriate actions to protect residents from abuse, which could jeopardize the safety and well-being of residents within the facility.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record (a document containing clinical and demographic data) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure (a sudden, life threatening condition where the lungs cannot provide oxygen to the blood or fail to remove carbon dioxide), diabetes mellitus (a disorder characterized by high blood sugar), and hypertension (high blood pressure).A review of Resident 1's AMA (against medical advice - document used by healthcare providers to document a resident's decision to leave a facility or discontinue treatment against…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of sexual abuse involving one of four sampled residents (Resident 1).This failure had the potential for the facility to not identify the concern or any potential harm, allowing ongoing or future abuse to continue which could jeopardize the health and safety of highly vulnerable residents living in the facility.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record (a document containing clinical and demographic data) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure (a sudden, life threatening condition where the lungs cannot provide oxygen to the blood or fail to remove carbon dioxide), diabetes mellitus (a disorder characterized by high blood sugar), and hypertension (high blood pressure).A review of Resident 1's AMA (against medical advice - document used by healthcare providers to document a resident's decision to leave a facility or discontinue treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document a change of condition for one of six sampled residents (Resident 42) when Resident 42 had new physician orders on October 30, 2024, for moisture associated skin damage (MASD-describes a range of skin conditions that occur when the skin is exposed to moisture for a prolonged period of time). This failure had the potential to result in delayed care and treatment for Resident 42 and cause harm. Findings: During an interview on October 28, 2024, at 10:04 AM, with Resident 42, Resident 42 stated he felt discomfort on his genital area due to skin redness. Resident 42 further stated he informed his nurse about redness. During a review of Resident 42's undated admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 42 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (stroke of the brain affecting weakness to the left side), type 2 diabetes mellitus (chronic condition where the body doesn't use insulin properly), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan (an individualized plan for the medical care of a resident) for smoking for one of one resident (Resident 70) investigated for smoking. This failure resulted in the facility to not have a plan of care regarding Resident 70's smoking privileges and facility interventions to ensure a safe smoking environment. This had the potential to increase the risk of accidents or injuries associated with fire hazards. Findings: During a review of Resident 70's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the admission record indicated Resident 70 was initially admitted [DATE], with diagnoses which included muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle mass), muscle weakness, schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), anxiety disorder (a condition that causes excessive feelings of fear, dread, and worry that persist over time and interfere with daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 19 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure for one of six sampled residents (Resident 44) when Resident 44's enteral feeding (nutrition feeding through a tube into the stomach) was found running at 65 mL/hr (ml-milliliters - a unit of measurement, hr-hour, amount given in an hour) instead of 60 mL/hr, on October 31, 2024 as specified by physician order. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 44 receiving extra calories than ordered by the physician and excessive weight gain. Findings: During an observation on October 28, 2024, at 10:16 AM, in Resident 44's room, Resident 44 was observed to be lying in bed, with the head of the bed elevated, facing the television. Resident 44 was unable to make needs known. During an observation on October 29, 2024, at 4:21 PM, in Resident 44's room, Resident 44's enteral feeding was running at 60ml/hr . During an interview on October 30, 2024, at 2:04 PM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), LVN 1 stated Resident 44's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident 73) investigated for respiratory care, received services as specified by the physician's orders when Resident 73's tracheostomy (a surgically created hole in the windpipe [trachea] that provides an alternative airway for breathing) was not monitored for redness, discharge, and discoloration every shift. This failure had the potential for Resident 73 to experience a delay in the staff identification and subsequent treatment of possible complications with his tracheostomy (such as infection) which would affect the resident's overall health and safety. Findings: During a review of Resident 73's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the admission record indicated Resident 73 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle mass), Asthma (a chronic lung disease that causes inflammation and tightening of the muscles around the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's policies and procedures for destruction, final disposition, and disposal for medications were followed when six medication tablets were found on top of the medication waste receptacle, available for use on [DATE]. This failure had the potential for the misuse of expired and discarded medications that could harm residents when administered. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], at 6:50 AM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) in the facility's medication supply room, six medication tablets were observed on top of the medication waste receptacle, readily available for use. LVN 2 stated the six medication tablets were not narcotics. The LVN 2 further stated the medication tablets were not properly disposed of inside the medication waste receptable and they (the tablets) were not supposed to be on top of the lid. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], at 6:52 AM, with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from one of the two facility's medication supply rooms when one expired intravenous (IV-a method of delivering fluids, nutrients, medications, or blood directly into a vein using a needle or tube) antibiotic (medicine that treats bacterial infections by killing bacteria or preventing them from growing and multiplying) was found in the medication fridge, readily available for use on October 30, 2024. This failure had the potential for the IV antibiotic to have decreased efficacy (ability to produce a desired result) and sub-therapeutic (less than optimal) effects when administered. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on October 30, 2024, at 6:57 AM, in the facility's medication supply room, with the Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1), one IV antibiotic medication of Daptomycin (antibiotic to treat a bone infection) was observed to be inside the medication refrigerator where IV medications are stored, readily available for use. The medication had an expiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices when Certified Nursing Assistant 1 did not don (put on) a gown upon entering the room of a resident (Resident 391) who was on contact precautions (a set of measures to prevent the spread of infectious agents through direct or indirect contact with a patient or their environment) on October 29, 2024. This failure had the potential to spread infectious disease (disease caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi, or parasite) to 91 medically compromised residents and staff in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 391's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the admission record indicated Resident 391 was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses which included sepsis (is an illness in which the body has a severe, inflammatory response to bacteria or other germs), local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue (the deepest layer of the skin), and methicillin resistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored in accordance with facility ' s policies and procedures and standards of practice when one of three residents, Resident 3 was observed to have these medications stored at his bedside unlocked: 1. One opened bottle of Genvoya (used to treat infections). 2. An injection pen of Ozempic (used to treat diabetes). This failure had the potential to place Resident 3 ' s health at risk for drug abuse and ingestion of unsanitary drugs. Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Records, the record (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 3 was admitted on [DATE]. With diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease of not able to control the blood sugar levels), cirrhosis of liver (a condition of damaged liver) and chronic kidney disease (a condition when the kidneys gradually stop working). During a review of Resident 3 ' s clinical record, History and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This failure had the potential to delay and promote wound healing for Resident 1 when one staff did not cover the surgical site (a cut in the skin made by a doctor) during surgery) with dry dressing per physician ' s order. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included orthopedic aftercare (the care and treatment one receives after an injury of the muscles, bones and joints), alcoholic cirrhosis of liver (a condition that causes the liver to become swollen and stiff), left artificial hip joint (left hip replacement surgery) and osteoarthritis (a condition in which the tissues in the joint break down over time). A review of Order Summary Report (physician ' s orders),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of four sample residents (Resident 1) who had used and tested positive for an illicit drug (a drug that is not allowed by the law). This failure had the potential to place Resident 1's overall health and safety at risk. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was last admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, shortness of breath, opioid use (a chronic condition that causes a person to have an uncontrollable urge to use unlawful drug), other acute and chronic respiratory failure (a condition that makes it difficult to breath on your own) and major depressive disorder a condition that affect how a person feels). A review of Resident 1's hospital records, titled, Discharge Summary page 4 of 36 indicated, Ms. [Name of Resident 1] is a 61 year with a history of stroke . and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for: a. Change of Condition for weight loss. b. To notify responsible party (RP) of left foot discoloration. This failure resulted in Resident 1 having unplanned weight loss and (RP) uniformed and unaware in foot discoloration changes. Findings: During review of Residents 1's admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on originally on October 30, 2021 and readmit August 20, 2023, with diagnoses to include: metabolic encephalopathy (chemical imbalance in the blood/brain), hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (muscle weakness or paralysis on one part of body due to stroke), pyelonephritis (kidney infection), vitamin B12 deficiency (can lead to reduction on red blood cells). During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 1's Medical Record with the Director of Nursing (DON), reviewed are as follows: 1. Cognitive patterns Section C, Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) per there policy and procedure to the state agency and the local ombudsman for an alleged physical abuse by staff member towards (Resident 1). This failure has the potential to put (Resident 1) health, safety, and well-being at risk. Findings: During review of Residents 1's admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include: kidney transplant, drug, or chemical induced diabetes mellitus (condition affecting how body processes sugar), hypertension (high blood pressure), osteoporosis (bones are brittle and fragile). During an interview with the License Vocational Nurse (LVN1) on November 30, 2023, at 12:06 PM, the (LVN1) stated, Around noon time on Sunday November 26, 2023, Resident 1, said I want to call 911, there was a woman who walked in, and she held me upside down. Which I thought that was odd, he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. Plastic food storage containers were stacked and stored wet, which prevented them from drying and had the potential to allow an environment where microorganisms can begin to grow. 2. The floor, under the stainless-steel counter, had food crumbs and loose trash, which had the potential for microorganism growth that could unintentionally be transferred to the food. 3. There were food crumbs found on the bottom shelf of reach-in freezer near the three-compartment sink, which had the potential for microorganism growth that could be transferred to the food. 4. There was food, black grime, and trash build-up found behind, and underneath the stove. This had the potential for microorganism growth that could inadvertently be transferred to food. 5. Ice machine had brown substance on the ice chute, which had the potential for microorganism growth that could contaminate the ice. These failures had the potential to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST- written medical orders that addresses a limited number of critical medical decisions) were filled out completely for six of nine residents (Residents 22, 34, 56, 58, 71, 77, and 85) reviewed for advance directives (legal document that states a person's wishes about receiving medical care if that person is no longer able to make medical decisions). This failure had the potential to result in a delay of treatment for Residents 22, 34, 56, 58, 71, 77, and 85 as related to advance directives, or for life sustaining measures to be rendered against what the resident wanted. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 22's admission Record (contains demographic information) indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), acute respiratory failure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's right to dignified existence, self-determination and communication was exercised for two of 34 sampled residents (Residents 75 and 42) when: 1. For Resident 75, the facility failed to provide the means for Resident 75 to be able to communicate her individualized care needs and preferences accurately and thoroughly with the facility. 2. For Resident 42, the facility failed to ensure Resident 42 was fed in a dignified manner when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 5) stood over while feeding her. These failures resulted in Residents 75, and 42's rights to be violated, which had the potential to cause psychosocial harm leading to low self-esteem, feeling irritated, sad, and anxious. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 75's clinical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle wasting and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-28 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a facility assessment tool) assessment was completed in accordance with the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) federal completion timeframes, for two residents reviewed for resident assessment (Residents 2 and 90). These failures had the potential to result in inadequate monitoring of Residents 2 and 90's progress and decline, and the lack of resident specific information to CMS for payment and quality measure monitoring. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 90's clinical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of larynx (cancer of the throat), adult failure to thrive (general state of decline that is characterized by profound weight loss, diminished appetite, poor nutrition, and lack of physical activity), and cerebral infarction (damage to the brain from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-28 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- a federal requirement to help ensure individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) was re-evaluated after a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA- a comprehensive Minimum Data Set [MDS] - a facility assessment tool) assessment done for a resident that must be completed when a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either improvement or decline), for three residents reviewed for PASRR (Residents 6, 32 and 90). These failures had the potential for Residents 6, 32, and 90 not to receive the care and services most appropriate for their needs. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 90's clinical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an individualized comprehensive care plan (specific interventions to provide effective and person-centered care to meet the resident's needs) was initiated for one of three residents (Resident 10) reviewed for pain management. This failure had the potential for Resident 10 to have unidentified care concerns related to pain management, placing his health and safety at risk. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on October 25, 2022, at 10:34 AM, with Resident 10, Resident 10 was lying in her bed watching television. Resident 10 was alert, oriented and able to make needs known. She also stated she has rheumatoid arthritis (disorder affecting many joints causing painful swelling) and was receiving pain medications to manage her pain level. During a review of Resident 10's clinical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for two of four residents reviewed for accidents (Residents 56 and 77) when Residents 56 and 77's smoking care plan were not implemented by the staff. These failures had the potential for Residents 56 and 77's safety needs to be unmet, which could place them at risk for accidents and life-threatening injuries. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 56's admission Record (demographic information), it indicated Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertensive heart disease (heart problems that occur because of high blood pressure that is present over a long time), atrophy of the kidney (condition in which one or both kidneys shrink to a smaller size, thus hindering normal function), and dementia (mental disorder in which a person loses the ability to think, remember, learn, make decisions, and solve problems). During review of Resident 56's Comprehensive Care Plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of pain management before, during, and after wound care treatment was implemented for one of four residents (Resident 63) reviewed for wound care. This failure had the potential for Resident 63 to experience excessive unrelieved and/or uncontrolled pain associated with the wound care treatment, due to absence of pain management intervention by facility staff providing the wound care treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 63's clinical record, the document titled admission Record, (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia/hemiparesis (caused by a brain injury resulting in varying degree of weakness on one side of the body), and pressure ulcer (a wound caused by unrelieved pressure and restricted blood flow) of sacral (a spine located at the back within the hip) region. During a review of Resident 63's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control and prevention measures to help prevent and manage transmission of diseases and infections when: 1. Resident 25's used nebulizer (a device producing a fine spray of liquid) masks and tubing were not properly stored per facility's policy. 2. Resident 10's used nebulizer masks and tubing were not properly stored per facility's policy. 3. A Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 6) failed to perform handwashing or hand hygiene during medication administration for Residents 42 and 85. These failures had the potential for cross contamination (physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object or place to another) and spread of infection which can adversely affect the health and wellbeing of 91 medically compromised residents. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 25's clinical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 25 was re-admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIVAPALAN, SIVAKAMI | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 01/06/2014 |
| DRIGGS, DANIEL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 11/06/2021 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $974K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056024. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.