No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lakeport Post Acute

1291 Craig Avenue, Lakeport, CA 95453 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 81 certified beds · (707) 263-6382 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (707) 263-6382 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
487 S Main St · (707) 263-4360 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
355 Lakeport Blvd · (707) 263-7337 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1408 Westside Park Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.6%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.0%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.5%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.5%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.8%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.1%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.0%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.6%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.3%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission11.3%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.9%11.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.522.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.371.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 221 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
88.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 88.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 93 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.5%CMS range 38.2–51.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 7.1–12.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge88.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge86.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge85.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting91.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge68.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.7–9.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.331.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.37
RN hours/ resident / day
0.91
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.23
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.51
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
29.8%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 77.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-19)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-05-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F760 (Rev. 173, Issued: 11-22-17, Effective: 11-28-17, Implementation: 11-28-17) The facility must ensure that its- S483.45(f)(2) Residents are free of any significant medication errors. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow facility policies & procedures that required triple-checking of medication before administration which resulted in failure to administer the correct medication prescribed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). As a direct result, Resident 1 experienced a life-threatening adverse reaction requiring emergency rescue medications, transfer to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH), and hospitalization in the intensive care unit for life threatening symptoms. This failure resulted in actual harm and exposed the resident to a substantial likelihood of death.A review of Resident 1's admission Record (facility demographic), indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary admitting diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease (a nervous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide nursing staff based on the 3.5 direct hours per patient day (DHPPD) for 27 out of 39 days reviewed. This failure resulted in two sampled residents, Resident 17 and Resident 37, ability to receive timely nursing care. This failure also had the potential to impact all residents in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's admission Record dated 6/18/25, the Admissions Record indicated that Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy (congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture), stroke (damage to brain from lack of blood supply), dementia (impairment of at least two brain function such as memory loss and judgement), and hemiplegia (muscle weakness of one side of the body). During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/17/25 at 9:30 AM with Resident 17 in his room, Resident 17 was observed laying on his right side, unable to reach his call light, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management services consistent with professional standards of practice for two of 18 sampled residents (Resident 15 and 222) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 administered pain medication one hour seven minutes after Resident 15 requested pain medication and did not conduct a pain reassessment within an hour after administration. 2. Licensed Nurses did not conduct pain reassessments within an hour after administering pain medication to Resident 222. This failure had the potential for Resident 15 and 222 to have unrelieved pain and diminished quality of life. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 15's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 15 on 5/22/2025, with multiple diagnoses including open wound to right foot, acute osteomyelitis (bone infection) right ankle and foot. During a review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set, dated 5/27/25, indicated Resident 15's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score was 14. The BIMS assessment indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/19/25 at 1:40 PM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 at the medication cart. One box containing hemorrhoid ointment was observed with an expiration date of 4/25. LVN 1 stated the ointment was expired and should have been removed from the medication cart. During an interview on 6/19/25 at 2:17 PM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated medications should not be available for use past their expiration date because the effectiveness of the medication could not be ensured. The DON stated, staff should inspect the medication carts weekly and remove any expired medication. During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Medication Labeling and Storage, reviewed February 2023, the P&P indicated, The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparations areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. If the facility has . outdated or deteriorated medications . pharmacy is contacted for instructions regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 12) for the ability to self-administer medications according to facility policy. This failure resulted in the potential for errors in Resident 12's medication administration. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 12's Care Plan Report, the Care Plan Report indicated Resident 12 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (disease that causes increased blood sugar) and left eye blindness. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/17/25 at 10:36 AM in Resident 12's room, 5 bottles of eye drops and 2 vials of insulin (medication to treat high blood sugar) was observed on the bedside table. Resident 12 explained that the nurse provided the medications at 6 AM for the resident to self-administer. Resident 12 stated she refilled her insulin pump (medical device that measures blood sugar and administers insulin) and self-administered her eye drops around…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person centered care plan for one of 18 sampled residents (Residents 222) when Resident 222's care plan intervention to store cigarettes and lighter in a lock box was not implemented. This failure had the potential for unauthorized access by residents which could result in harm. Findings: During an observation on 6/17/25 at 9:00 AM, in Resident 222's room, the room door was open and Resident 222 was not in the room. One cigarette lighter was on the bed and another lighter was on the nightstand. A box of cigarettes was also placed on the nightstand. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/19/25 at 8:47 AM, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, in Resident 222's room, the room door was open and Resident 222 was not in the room. Two packs of cigarettes were on the bed and box containing six cigarettes packs were on top of the nightstand. CNA 1 stated that the cigarettes should not have been left out unattended to prevent other residents from unauthorized access. CNA 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure quality of care when physician orders to monitor fasting blood sugar levels of Resident 35, who is on insulin medication, were not followed and recorded. This deficient practice had the potential to adversely affect the resident's medical condition. Findings: During a review of the resident's record, the physician order dated 5/20/25 indicated, Check FSBG [Fasting Blood Glucose] QA.M [Every morning]. During an interview on 6/18/25 at 2:20 PM with Infection Preventionist (IP), IP stated there was an order for fasting blood glucose every day, but no fasting blood sugar values were recorded in the chart since 5/20/25. IP stated they are supposed to be monitoring the values per the Physician order. During an interview on 6/18/25 at 2:29 PM with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated Resident 35's blood sugar should have been checked every morning. During an interview on 6/18/25 at 2:30 PM with Resident 35, Resident 35 stated that she was told by nurses she did not need her blood sugar monitored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 10 percent when three identified medication errors out of 30 opportunities were observed: 1. Aspirin 81 mg (miligram- unit of measurement) enteric coated (lower strength of aspirin that is often used to help prevent heart attacks and strokes) was administered without a physician's order for two residents (Resident 34 and Resident 54). 2. Lactulose (medication used to lower ammonia, a toxin in the body) was omitted without a physician's order for one resident (Resident 321). Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 34's Face Sheet (demographics), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 34 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure). During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/18/25 at 8:13 AM with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 in Resident 34's room, LVN 1 administered one enteric coated (coated to resist stomach acid to dissolve in the intestines) tablet of Aspirin 81 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen food preparation and storage areas were maintained in a safe and sanitary manner when two fans blowing air into the kitchen had fine white colored particles. This failure placed all residents who received food prepared in the kitchen, at risk for foodborne illness and food contamination. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/18/25 at 11:35 AM, with the Registered Dietitian (RD), in the kitchen, a stand-up fan had fine white colored particles and was blowing air directed into the food delivery cart. A floor fan had fine white colored particles and was blowing air directed to the tray-line and food preparation area. RD stated it was dust on both fans and stated that the fans should be dust free because the dust particles can land on the food. During a review of FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Food Code 2022, 4-602.13 Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, the FDA Food Code indicated, The presence of food debris or dirt on nonfood contact surfaces may provide a suitable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when powder like substance was observed on the surface areas around two of two pill crushers. This failure had the potential to result in harm from cross contamination. Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/19/25 at 1:28 PM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 in the facility hallway, the pill crusher on the medication cart for side two of the facility was coated in white and black colored powder-like substance. LVN 2 stated the pill crusher was dirty and that it should have been cleaned to prevent cross contamination. b. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/19/25 at 1:40 PM with LVN 1 in the facility hallway, the pill crusher on the medication cart for side one of the facility was coated in white, brown, and black colored powder-like substance. LVN 1 stated the pill crusher was dirty. During an interview on 6/19/25 at 1:47 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the pill crusher should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility nursing staff failed to give acetaminophen (generic for Tylenol, a medication for mild pain and fever reducer) as ordered to one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was given more than 3000 mg (milligrams) of acetaminophen on 29 days of 34 days at the facility. This failure to follow Resident 1 ' s physician ' s orders had the potential to cause liver damage in a vulnerable resident who had several serious medical problems. Finding: During a record review of Resident 1 ' s electronic medical record on 2/20/25 at 1:20 p.m., Resident 1 ' s face sheet (demographic information) revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple medical diagnoses including heart transplant, end-stage kidney disease, Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic disease characterized by high blood sugar), broken right hip with surgical repair, and Covid-19. Further review of Resident 1 ' s face sheet revealed he was discharged on 1/6/25. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-18 · tag F0574 — widespread
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the list of information such as the name and the correct Department of the State Survey Agency, & the State Licensure were accurate and written visibly available to all vulnerable residents, staff and visitors. This failure had the potential to result in unreported and uninvestigated complaint or any incident to the State Agency or State Licensing by a resident/s, staff and visitors who may have had concerns and requires advocacy. Findings: During an observation of the facility on 12/14/23 at 2 p.m., inside the glass of the bulletin board in Hall 500 was an approximately a 3x5 inches white paper with posting indicated The Licensing Agency having authority over this facility is: Department of Health Services, Licensing and Certification Division. During a Resident Meeting on 12/13/23 at 2:30 p.m., when residents were asked who attended the Resident Council Meetings, they stated they only knew that there was Ombudsman information posted but were not aware of the name of the State Agency or State…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the food was palatable, was served timely and was served at temperatures in accordance with resident preferences for seven out of seven sampled residents (Residents 376, 68, 65, 375, 226, 52 and 50). These failures had the potential to result in residents not eating the food served which could result in weight loss and further compromise their medical status. Findings: During an interview on 12/11/23 at 1:49 p.m., Resident 376 stated he dislike the food at the facility. Resident 376 stated food had no taste and vegetables were soggy. During an interview on 12/11/23 at 1:52 p.m., Resident 68 stated food comes in late, so it was usually cold by the time he gets it. Resident 68 stated food at the facility was not good, bland and had no taste. During an interview on 12/12/23 at 9:10 a.m., Resident 65 stated food at the facility was not great. Resident 65 stated food was very bland and had no taste. Resident 65 stated meal trays comes late so food was already cold when it gets to her. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-18 · tag F0813 — widespread
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1. residents' food items were labeled with name and dated and expired food items were discarded. These failures led to unsafe and unsanitary storage of food. These failures were also a safety risk that could lead to accidental ingestion of expired food items. Findings: During an observation on 12/13/23 at 1:40 p.m., resident's refrigerator was in the staff breakroom. The refrigerator side was broken. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/13/23 at 1:47 p.m., Unlicensed Staff AA verified she put the jar of minced garlic for the resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] in the refrigerator. Unlicensed Staff AA stated there was no name to identify who this jar of minced garlic belonged to. Unlicensed Staff AA verified the jar of minced garlic was opened but not dated. Unlicensed Staff AA stated she was unable to read the jar of minced garlic expiration date. Unlicensed Staff AA stated resident's food items should be labeled with their name, should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-18 · tag F0837 — widespread
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the Governing Body (a group of people that has the authority to exercise governance over an organization) failed to ensure to designate or appoint a California Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) (Administrator is responsible for establishing and implementing policies regarding the management of the facility) who would be legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies regarding the management and operation when: 1) The Administrator in training (AIT) claimed to be the Administrator of the facility, for over 6 weeks including during the recertification survey dated 12/11/23 - 12/14/23. 2) The AIT was licensed by the State of Montana and was currently scheduled to take the reciprocity administrator licensing exam on 12/14/23. 3) The current licensee Administrator for the facility was not present in the building to provide oversite since October 2023 and during the survey on 12/11/-12/14/23. The current administrator was supervising other two facilities which were more than two hours away from this facility, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-18 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance Committee (QAA) is composed of the required committee members, such as an active licensed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) of California during the QAPI meeting dated 10/23 & 11/23. This failure had the potential to result in mismanagement of the practices required by the Administrator to keep the vulnerable resident safe and healthy. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/14/23 at 2 p.m., inside the glass of the bulletin board in Hall 500 was an approximately a 3x5 inches white paper with posting indicated [the name of the licensee Administrator], which was not the AIT present. When asked the AIT, who was this licensee Administrator whose name was posted on the bulletin board, the AIT stated that he was the licensee Administrator but had not been there for over 6 weeks. When the AIT was asked where the licensee Administrator was, the AIT replied, he had not been there. The AIT was asked for a copy of his current Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) license and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to 1. ensure staff were offering and performing hand hygiene (HH, a way of cleaning one's hands that substantially reduces potential pathogens (harmful microorganisms) on the hands) to the residents before or after meals for 12 out of 12 sampled residents (Residents 47, 22, 40 11, 48, 50, 24, 63, 52, 72, 2 and 28), when [NAME] 1 did not perform HH and continue to cook eggs after he wiped his gloved hand in front of his shirt, and ensure staff were following the facility's guideline for donning Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illnesses) when staff did not wear gloves when she scooped ice in the ice machine located in the kitchen 2. ensure an oxygen tubing was dated when it was changed and ensure there was a humidifier (a medical device used to humidify supplemental oxygen that provides long-lasting moisture for utmost patient comfort during oxygen therapy) when a resident was using an oxygen concentrator (a medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 14, Resident 35, and Resident 38, Resident 51) and resident's representative(s) participated in the plan of care when Care Conferences were not held for the last two quarters according to facility Policy and Procedure. This failure had the potential to interfere with the five resident's ability to achieve and maintain their highest level of activity and independent. Findings: (Refer F 745) During an interview with Resident 14 on 12/12/23, at 9:45 a.m., he stated he was concerned about getting out of the facility and back to his apartment. He stated he wanted to be back in (name of town), a town located 43 miles away, where all his friends and family were located. He stated there were rehabilitation facilities in (name of town) he wanted to transfer to, and had told staff of his desire to transfer, but staff had told him that he could not. Resident 14 stated he did not remember being involved in a Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure 1. they were adequately staffed for 21 out of 31 days for CNAs and nine out of 31 days for licensed nurses in 10/2023, 19 out of 30 days for CNAS and 8 out of 30 days for licensed nurses for 11/2023 and 8 out of 12 days for CNAs and 4 out of 12 days for licensed nurses for 12/2023 which resulted in residents' complaints of assistance not being provided by staff in a timely manner and call light not being answered timely for five out of five sampled residents (Residents 380, 376, 68, 332 and 226 ) and residents feeling scared and anxious staff would not get to them on time in case of medical emergency 2. staff were provided in service on Trauma Informed Care (TIC, eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident) which could result in staff not knowing how to properly and competently care for residents with trauma and staff inability to identify possible triggers that could result in re-traumatization (the reactivation of trauma symptoms via thoughts, memories, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-18 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure training materials, resources, and policies and procedures explained all allegations of abuse must be reported in two hours. This failure resulted in staff not knowing the correct timeline to submit an SOC341 (State of California Report of Suspected Dependent Adult / Elder Abuse) (This form documents the information given by the reporting party on the suspected incident of abuse or neglect of an elder or dependent adult.), after they had become aware of an allegation of abuse. Finding: During an interview on 12/13/23, at 12:00 PM, CNA Q stated she would report allegations of abuse to charge nurse and the nurse would report and file an SOC 341. She stated the time to report is 24 hours. During an interview and record review with Director of Staff Development (DSD), on 12/14/23, at 11:15 a.m., she stated Abuse Prevention and Reporting was completed for every new hire and at annual in-services. She stated Abuse Reporting time frame was Two hours if harm and 24 hours if no harm. A review of the resources and documents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate the Medical Doctor's (MD) appointment for Level II Preadmission Screening (PASARR) for one (1) of eight (8) residents, Resident 52. This failure resulted in cancellation of MD's evaluation for mental illness and a delay of care and services needed for Resident 52. Findings: Level II PASARR is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in a nursing home for long term care. A record review of Resident 52 titled admission record indicated she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with mental conditions of agoraphobia (is afraid to leave environments they know or consider to be safe) with panic disorder, Bipolar II disorder and panic disorder (episodic anxiety). A record review of Resident 52's evaluation titled Level I PASARR dated 9/27/23 was positive indicated a Level II PASARR mental health evaluation from Department of Health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff were aware of the Basic Care Plan (BCP, a plan that promotes continuity of care and communication among nursing home staff to increase resident safety) completion time frame and BCP's were completed timely for two out of two sampled residents (Residents 40 and 49). These failures had the potential to put residents' safety at risk and for residents not receiving the care that they need. Findings: A review of Resident 40's face sheet (demographics) indicated she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Hyperlipidemia (HLP, high cholesterol is an excess of lipids or fats in your blood), Dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities) and Major Depressive Disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Her Minimum Data Sheet Assessment (MDS, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when 1. the facility failed to notify the physician of resident's blood sugar of 400 or more for one out of one sampled resident (Resident 49) 2. the facility failed to provide regular scheduled showers for three out of three sampled residents (Residents 65, 49 and 37). These failures could lead to 1. complications associated with Diabetes Mellitus such as hypoglycemia (a condition in which your blood sugar (glucose-body's main energy source) level is lower than the standard range, hyperglycemia (high blood glucose (blood sugar)and stroke (brain attack, occurs when something blocks blood supply to part of the brain or when a blood vessel in the brain bursts). 2. residents looking unkempt, undignified, feeling insecure and uncomfortable. Findings: A review of Resident 65's face sheet (demographics) indicated she was initially admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to help schedule an appointment for evaluation of a hearing aid device for one resident, Resident 37. This failure resulted in Resident 37 feeling frustrated and angry due to hearing loss and not being able to hear adequately without the use of hearing aid device. Findings: A record review titled admission Record for Resident 37 indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with a condition of Hearing loss. During an observation and interview on 12/12/23 at 11:10 a.m., in Resident 37's room, Resident 37 wore a large headphone while watching television (TV). Resident 37 removed his headphone and was not able to hear what was said to him. This surveyor had to get close to Resident 37's ear and speak loudly for Resident 37 to be able to hear. Resident 37 apologized for not being able to hear well. Resident 37 stated that he requested to get a hearing aid from the Social Worker since July 2023 with no results to this date. Resident 37 stated that he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient and appropriate social services were provided to meet the needs of Resident 1, Resident 14, Resident 51, Resident 38, Resident 35, Resident 52 & Resident 37, when: 1. The facility did not conduct and document an Interdisciplinary Team Meeting and Care Conference for the last two quarters for Resident 1, Resident 14, Resident 51, Resident 38, Resident 35. 2. The facility did not ensure that Resident 52 had the Level II PASARR evaluation by a Medical Doctor's scheduled in 9/23. Failure to attend the scheduled Medical Doctor's appointment for Level II PASARR evaluation resulted in cancellation, and therefore Resident 52 needed to begin with the entire process for PASARR evaluation. Level II PASARR evaluation will determine the proper care and home placement. 3.The facility failed to arrange the Medical Doctor's (MD) appointment for Resident 37's evaluation for Hearing Aide device that was very much needed due to his hard of hearing since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the development of a plant-based menu. This failure had the potential for vegetarian residents to not meet the recommended daily intake (RDI, the average daily dietary intake level that is sufficient to meet the nutrient requirements of nearly all (97-98 per cent) healthy individuals in a particular life stage and gender group) for certain nutrients like protein or vitamins which could further compromise their medical status . Findings: During an interview on 12/13/23 at 2:31 p.m., the RD stated the facility did not have a plant based menu. The RD stated if a resident was vegetarian, they would be served the same food as the resident with a regular diet, however, they would substitute it with vegan option. The RD stated the facility did not have a menu specific to cater to resident who was vegetarian. The RD stated she was not aware having a plant based menu was a standard. When asked if she thought having a plant based menu for the facility was important to meet vegetarian resident's needs, she did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen walls were in good repair when holes on the walls were noted. This failure could result in rodents and pest accessing the kitchen area through these holes which could put residents at risk for harmful diseases. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/14/23 at 6:44 a.m., when asked about the multiple holes on the kitchen wall by the dish sanitizing machine, the Registered Dietician (RD) stated she could not identify what those holes were, but it could possibly be screw holes. When asked if those kitchen holes should be covered, she stated she does not know how deep those were, but she would notify maintenance today. The RD stated she conducted environmental rounds in the kitchen monthly. The RD stated she did not recall if she had noted these kitchen holes on her kitchen environmental rounds. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/14/23 at 12:12 p.m., the Maintenance Director was shown the holes in kitchen wall by the dish sanitizing machine. The Maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's, Resident 230's, responsible party, act on behalf of Resident 230 in order to support her in decision-making regarding her care, when the facility did not explain the risks and benefits of bed rails to the responsible party, and did not ask for her consent, before installing the bed rails. This failure had the potential to result in injuries to Resident 230 related to entrapment due to her cognitive impairment. Findings: A review of Resident 230's admission Record, dated 7/8/23, indicated that her medical diagnoses included, Vascular Dementia (Vascular dementia is a general term describing problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, memory, and other thought processes caused by brain damage from impaired blood flow to your brain) Severe, With Other Behavioral Disturbances, Unsteadiness on Feet, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Unspecified Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, and Personal History of Healed Traumatic Fracture. The admission record indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident, Resident 71, was provided her medical records within the accepted timeframes after she made an oral request to the Administrator in Training (AIT). This failure had the potential to result in mismanaged care if Resident 71 was not provided her medical records that would help with decision-making with regards to her healthcare and could have a negative impact on her health and well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 71's record indicated that her BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was 13 (Score of 13-15 indicated no impairment in cognition). During an interview on 12/14/23, at 10:10 a.m., with Resident 71, she stated she spoke to the AIT and requested if she could have all her medical records which included her physical therapy records, written discharge plan, appointments with her doctor, etc. Resident stated that the Ombudsman advocated for her to get these medical records, but she still has not gotten any. During an interview on 12/15/23, ay 1:25 p.m., with the Ombudsman, she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat 4 of 6 residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 4, and Resident 5) with respect, dignity, and kindness when: 1. Resident 1 for waited in pain while seated in her wheelchair in soiled underwear for a half hour or more before she was assisted back to bed and cleaned. 2. Resident 2 sat on the commode or in her soiled underwear for long periods waiting for assistance and waited 2 hours for her pain medication. 3. Resident 4 waited in the toilet once or twice a day or waited 2-4 hours sitting on her soiled or wet adult diapers to get cleaned. 4. Resident 5 laid in her soiled underwear for 45 minutes or more waiting for assistance. This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling resigned to suffer through her hip pain, Resident 2 crying, feeling the nurse was rude and disrespectful and purposely making her wait, Resident 4 feeling upset, and Resident 5 feeling upset, inadequate, dirty, and disrespected. The failure also has the potential to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from accidents for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when there were no new interventions in place when Resident 1 fell on [DATE] and again on 11/10/22 and the nurses did not follow up with the physician regarding a request for X-ray on 1/11/22 to rule out fracture. This failure resulted in Resident 1 complaining of rib pain on 11/11/22 and subsequent hospitalization on 11/14/22 due to a fractured (broken) rib. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s face sheet (demographics), it indicated he was [AGE] years old with diagnoses including repeated Falls, Heart Failure, Muscle weakness and Anemia (a condition in which you lack enough healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to your body's tissues). His Minimum Data Sheet Assessment (MDS, a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) dated 11/4/22, Brief Interview for Mental Status Assessment (BIMS,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievance forms and complaints information were visually accessible and attainable by residents in the Facility without retaliation or fear of discrimination. This failure had the potential to result in violation of resident's rights, maltreatment, neglect, and loss of personal items. During an interview on 6/21/2022 at 2:30 p.m., at the Resident Council meeting in the Dining room, Resident 52 stated, he did not know where to get the grievance form. Resident 70 stated she did not know where the grievance forms was located. Resident 12 stated, he did not know where to get the grievance forms. Residents 52, 26, 70 ,12 & 34 stated they did not know where to find the phone number for the State Agency and how to file complaints. Resident 26 stated he did know where the forms were located. During an observation on 6/21/2022 at 3:30 p.m., Resident 26 wheeled himself to the end of the hallway where the grievance forms would be. Resident 26 did not find any grievance forms. The Ombudsman phone number was posted in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for four sampled residents (Resident 75, Resident 22, Resident 32, and Resident 48), that were individualized and updated to show residents specific care related to their medical needs. These failures could possibly result in residents decline in health, harm, and negatively impact the residents' quality of care and services. Findings: Resident 75 Record review indicated Resident 75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus (A chronic disease characterized by high levels of blood sugar) and Muscle Weakness, according to the facility Face Sheet. A nursing note dated 6/09/22 at 6:21 p.m., indicated, This nurse alerted by CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) staff that this resident [Resident 75] is not acting normal' .her R (Right) ankle is swollen, but not discolored and causing her 9/10 pain (Pain scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means there is no pain, and 10 is the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 24 During an interview on 6/21/22 at 11:15 p.m., Resident 24 was sitting up at the side of the bed. When asking questions about her care she stated, the care was ok and the food was not that good. Resident 24 stated that her upper dentures were not fitted correctly and she has no lower dentures making it hard for her to eat solid foods. Resident 24 stated she liked her breakfast which was eggs and toast. Resident 24 stated I mash up the egg on the toast and I can eat that. Resident 24 stated she had asked to see a social worker to help her schedule a dentist appointment for her dentures but no one has come. Resident 24stated I cannot eat the food because of my dentures. I cannot chew a lot of the foods and I do not like the pureed foods. Review of Resident 24's Interdisciplinary Team notes for a weight meeting dated 5/19/22 indicated, the resident had a significant weight loss of 7.4% over the last month. During an interview on 6/23/22 at 9:30 a.m., the Registered Dietician was asked about the care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1. Adequately supervise one of four sampled residents, Resident # 33, when he was observed smoking unsupervised in an area of the facility which was not the designated smoking area, and with an oxygen tank that was strapped at the back of his wheelchair. This failure had the potential to result in a burn injury to Resident # 33. 2. Implement interventions and actions to prevent one of six residents (Resident 75) from falling, after she fell and fractured her right ankle at the facility. This had the potential to result in another fall with injury to Resident 75. Findings: 1. During an observation on 6/20/22, at 2:18 p.m., outside the facility's main entrance, Resident # 33 was observed smoking while seated on his wheelchair and under a No Smoking sign. Resident # 33 was smoking without supervision and he was on oxygen via nasal cannula. During an interview with on 6/21/22, at 3:10 p.m., with Unlicensed Staff P, he stated Resident # 33…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were available to provide care and services to residents for each shift and ensure that resident needs were met when the facility did not have sufficient staff to assign to the Red Zone (Covid 19 positive residents who were potentially infectious), and resident reported long wait times for call light responses. This failure had the potential to affect infection control, and the quality of care provided and safety to the residents in the facility. Findings: During an interview on 6/20/22 at 1:30 p.m., the Administrator and DON were asked if there were dedicated staff in the Red Zone for the positive COVID19 resident. The response from both Administrator and DON was due to their staffing shortage, they did not have dedicated staff for the Red Zone. There was one staff that worked in the Red Zone Hallway that also provide care to other residents in adjacent rooms. During interviews on 6/20/22 at 11:00 a.m. and 6/21/22 and 9:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to offer a palatable meal to the residents of the facility on regular and pureed consistencies. This had the potential to cause a negative dining experience, loss of appetite and a decrease in caloric intake for the residents of the facility. Findings: During an interview on 6/22/22 at 2:32 p.m., Resident 229, she stated she did not like the food because it was served cold every day. Record Review of Resident 229's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status-A cognition assessment) score dated 6/16/22 was 15, which indicated her cognition was intact. During an interview on 6/21/22 at 11:30 a.m., Resident 178 stated the food did not taste good, and as a result, he had lost a lot of weight at the facility. Record Review of Resident 178's BIMS score dated 5/21/22 was 13, which indicated her cognition was intact During an interview on 6/22/22 at 1:41 p.m., Resident 9 stated she did not like the food because it tasted dry and no flavor. Resident 9 stated she forced herself to eat the food. During a taste tray observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare meals in a sanitary manner, when: 1. Expired dairy was found in one of the facility's refrigerators, 2. Flies were observed in the kitchen sitting in the beverage cart, during tray line observation, and; 3. A Dietary Aid (Dietary Aid L) was observed serving beverages, and pulling up his pants in the process without washing his hands before serving more beverages. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness and spread of infections to the resident population. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and observation on 6/20/22 at 12:45 p.m., one of the facility refrigerators was observed to store two open boxes of thickened dairy milk with expiration dates of 6/19/2022. This was observed by Dietary Aid K, who was present during the observation. Dietary Aid K took the boxes away to discard them. She stated everybody in the kitchen was responsible for checking food in the refrigerators to ensure no expired food products were stored. The facility policy titled, LABELING AND…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 22 and Resident 79) was complete and accurate, when: 1) Resident 22's documentation on urinary catheter (a tube placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder) care for the month of June, 2022, had several empty boxes, making it unable to determine if he received the care ordered by the physician. 2) Resident 79's closed record did not contain a discharge summary and comprehensive care plan These failures had the potential to result in inability for the interdisciplinary team to determine if required nursing care and services were provided to Resident 22 and Resident 79 as per physician orders, and for the physicians to be aware if their orders had been implemented. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Pressure Ulcer (Injury to the skin due to pressure over time) of Sacral (Lower back)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices when staff did not follow the facility's policy and procedures for infection control when entering Person Under Investigation (PUI) rooms without appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment), and when residents were not cohorted, and staff moved between Red, Yellow and [NAME] zones (Red zone: residents confirmed positive test for Covid-19; Yellow zone: residents suspected of developing Covid-19 and exposed to Covid-19; [NAME] zone: residents who were not exposed and had negative test for Covid-19) potentially increasing the spread of infections. These failures had the potential to spread COVID-19 infections to other residents and staff. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 6/20/22 at 13:00 p.m., CNA I entered resident room [ROOM NUMBER], a Yellow (residents on transmission based precautions due to exposure to Covid19) cohorted room not wearing Personal Protective Equipment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-28 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 179), the opportunity to participate in care planning when no care conference meetings (A meeting between healthcare professionals and the resident to decide the resident's needs, discuss the medical team's goals, and discuss the resident's ideas for meeting those needs) were held inviting her to develop her plan of care. This failure had the potential to result in inability for Resident 179 to advocate for her needs, receive information regarding her care, and begin to develop a discharge plan with the interdisciplinary team. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 179 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus (A chronic disease characterized by high levels of blood sugar) and Gangrene (Localized death and decomposition of body tissue), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). Record review of Resident 179's MDS (Minimum Data Set-An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-28 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman for one discharged resident to the Community, Resident 80. This failure had the potential to result in unsafe discharge, accidents and worsening mental and health care. Findings: A record titled discharge summary dated 4/20/22 revealed Resident 80 had medical diagnoses of Chronic Pulmonary obstructive Disease (COPD), Infection in the leg bone, major depressive and anxiety disorder. Resident 80 lived alone. A Recapitulation of Resident's Stay revealed, Resident admitted with failure to thrive (FTT), COPD, falls at home, early dementia, anxiety/panic attacks, depression, chronic pain, infected left hip. (Name) (Resident 80) was discharged home due to HMO (Health Maintenance Organization) discharge. Medicare Coverage ends on 4/16/2022 Review of a document titled Progress notes dated 4/20/22 at 11:47 a.m. for Resident 80, revealed Licensed Staff C wrote Resident was discharge to home at 11:47 a.m. This nurse went over medication and discharge instructions. Resident assisted by staff. Further review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-28 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the recommendations by the State of California when they did not perform a PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review-A federal program implemented to prevent individuals with mental illness (MI), intellectual disability (ID) or related conditions (RC) from being inappropriately placed in a Medicaid certified nursing facilities for long-term care, and ensure these individuals receive specialized services) II (Level 2) screening after 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 35) tested positive for a PASARR I (Level 1, initial screen)screening. This finding had the potential to result in Resident 35's inability to obtain specialized services to manage her mental illnesses, which could have resulted in incapacity to attain or maintain her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being Findings: Record review indicated Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnoses including Fracture of Left Femur…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice to one out of three sampled residents, Resident # 66, when Resident # 66's Controlled Drug Record for Oxycodone/APAP (A combination preparation of the analgesic and antipyretic acetaminophen and the semisynthetic opioid agonist oxycodone with analgesic and antitussive properties) 5/325 MG (milligram) tablet indicated that Licensed Staff A did not sign-out the Controlled Drug Record when she prepared, and after she administered the medication to Resident # 66, and the pharmacy instruction on the medication label indicated that the frequency of the administration of this as needed pain medication was not followed. These failures had the potential to result in physical harm to Resident # 66. Findings: During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review on 6/23/22, at 9:40 a.m., with Licensed Staff B during inspection of Medication Cart # 1, the Controlled Drug Record for Resident # 66's Oxycodone/APAP 5/325 MG tablet indicated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-28 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process plan for one sampled Resident (Resident 80) when Resident 80 was discharged home without proper discharge planning and without arrangements for potentially needed follow -up services. This failure had the potential to result in undetected worsening medical and mental health conditions, and potential preventable readmissions. Findings: A record titled discharge summary dated 4/20/22 revealed Resident 80 had medical diagnoses of Chronic Pulmonary obstructive Disease (COPD), Infection in the leg bone, major depressive and anxiety disorder. A Recapitulation of Resident's Stay revealed, Resident admitted with failure to thrive (FTT), COPD, falls at home, early dementia, anxiety/panic attacks, depression, chronic pain, infected left hip. (Name) (Resident 80) was discharged home due to HMO (Health Maintenance Organization) discharge. During a record review titled Progress notes dated 4/20/22 at 11:47 a.m. for Resident 80, revealed Licensed Staff C wrote Resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 178) received appropriate respiratory care when: 1. Physician orders were not followed for supplemental oxygen (The use of oxygen as a medical treatment) administration, and; 2. A Licensed Nurse (Licensed Staff M) left Resident 178 alone and unsupervised during the administration of a nebulizer (A device for producing a fine spray of liquid, used for example for inhaling a medicinal drug) treatment. These findings had the potential to result in respiratory failure, harm and death to Resident 178. Findings: 1. Record review indicated Resident 178 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (A condition that results in the inability to effectively exchange carbon dioxide and oxygen, and induces chronically low oxygen levels or chronically high carbon dioxide levels), Pneumonia (Lung inflammation caused by a bacterial or viral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-28 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 48 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's medical supervision such as weight loss was assessed and monitored by a Physician to one of four residents, Resident 48. This failure had the potential to results in malnourish, electrolyte imbalance and dehydration. A [AGE] year-old female with history of Parkinson's disease, Dementia without behavioral disturbance, cognitive communication deficit with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 4, (Not cognitively intact). During a record review titled Weekly Weights for Resident 48 revealed, on 5/8/2022 weighed 112 lbs., on 5/10 weighted 110.2 lbs., on 6/5 weighed 107 lbs., 6/19 weighed 104.8 lbs. Resident 48 loss 7.2 lbs. approximately within one month. A record review of Resident 48's food intakes revealed 51- 75% most of the time. A record review titled Progress Notes dated 6/22/2022 for Resident 48 written by Registered Dietician (RD) revealed that Resident continues with trending weight loss. In the past 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure in ordering and receiving non-controlled medications (Pharmaceutical preparations that can only be obtained through a practitioner's prescription dispensed by a pharmacist and are not considered controlled substances under the Controlled Substances Act) for one of nine sampled residents, Resident # 33, when four (4) prescription medications scheduled to be administered on 6/23/22, at 8 a.m., were not available for administration to Resident # 33. Due to this incident, Resident # 33 refused to take the rest of his medications scheduled for 8 a.m., until the facility could provide the missing prescription medications. This failure to administer Resident # 33's medications as scheduled, due to insufficient supply of his prescribed medications to meet his needs, had the potential to result in worsening of his medical conditions. Findings: During a review of Resident # 33's admission Record, dated 6/23/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 32) for episodes of anxiety and depression, for which she was given medications with significant adverse effects. This had the potential to result in administration of unnecessary medications, which could have caused Resident 32 serious harm. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (A lung disease characterized by chronic obstruction of lung airflow that interferes with normal breathing) and Major Depressive Disorder (A mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), according to the facility Face Sheet. Record review of Resident 32's MDS (Minimum Data Set-An assessment tool) dated 5/16/22 indicated her BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status-A cognition assessment) was 4, which indicated her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
FERAMISCO, JAMISONIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/01/2022
PLOEGER, CORBYNIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/26/2024
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$688K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 6%Medicare 26%Other / private 68%

This home reported $688K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$438per resident / day
operating cost
$13,301per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$468per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555222. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next