No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lincoln Meadows Care Center

1550 Third Street, Lincoln, CA 95648 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 97 certified beds · (916) 645-7761 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (916) 645-7761 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Sep 2024
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1530 3rd St · (916) 645-3916 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
255 Lincoln Blvd · (916) 209-5176 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
410 Lincoln Blvd
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2010 1st St · (916) 409-2333

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.2%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.2%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.6%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.2%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.6%13.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.8%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.2%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.5%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.2%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.432.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.601.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 250 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
87.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.60U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.33hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 87.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 127 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.60 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.6%CMS range 53.4–66.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.8–12.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge87.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge86.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge80.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.0%CMS range 6.1–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.67
RN hours/ resident / day
1.10
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.32
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.10
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.51
RN hoursweekends
35.8%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 90.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-21)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with manufacturer guidelines and prescriber instructions for one (1) of ten (10) sampled residents (Resident 47), when the facility failed to identify and correct the inappropriate administration times for glipizide, a medication requiring administration approximately 30 minutes before meals for effective blood sugar control. Glipizide doses were instead scheduled at standardized times that did not align with mealtimes or manufacturer recommendations. This failure created the potential for uncontrolled blood sugar and disease related complications. Findings:A review of the clinical record showed Resident 47 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including primary hypertension (high blood pressure) and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat). In 2024, diagnoses were updated to include uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Physician orders for glipizide included:- Glipizide 5 mg (milligram, strength)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate remained below 5%. The facility's medication error rate was 6.67%, with two errors identified during 30 medication administration opportunities. Errors were observed for two of five sampled residents (Resident 47 and Resident 16) when Resident 47 received glipizide, a medication used to control blood sugar, at the wrong time, which was not in accordance with the physician's orders or the manufacturer's specifications and Resident 16 did not receive her as needed (PRN) dose of hydralazine, a medication prescribed for the treatment of high blood pressure, despite having an elevated blood pressure reading that met the parameters for administration per the physician's order. These failures resulted in residents being placed at risk for complications related to uncontrolled blood sugar and uncontrolled high blood pressure.Findings:1. During a medication observation on 5/18/2026 at 8:24 a.m. at the 1 B medication cart, Licensed Nurse (LN 1) prepared eight oral medications for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of ten sampled residents (Resident 16) was free from a significant medication error when staff did not administer a prescribed as needed (PRN) antihypertensive medication as ordered by the physician.This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for complications associated with uncontrolled high blood pressure, including stroke, heart attack, and kidney damage.Findings:A review of Resident 16's clinical record, indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with some of the following diagnoses: high blood pressure (hypertension), atrial fabulation (irregular heartbeat), diastolic heart failure (decreased blood flow to the body) and chronic kidney disease stage 3 (moderate kidney damage).A review of Resident 16's clinical record indicated a physician's order, dated 4/28/26, for hydralazine oral tablet 50 mg (milligram, strength), give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for hypertension, give if systolic blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two out of 19 sampled residents (Resident 7 and Resident 85) received an ongoing activity program that met their psychosocial needs (a combination of mental health, emotional, spiritual, or behavioral needs important to a person), as required by their comprehensive plans of care. The facility did not maintain documentation showing that either resident received ongoing activities.This failure placed both residents at risk for psychosocial, emotional, spiritual, and mental decline and prevented them from achieving their highest practicable well being.Findings:1a. A review of Resident 7's clinical record indicated Resident 7 was admitted March of 2026 and had diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where the brain does not receive enough nutrients or oxygen to function properly, leading to altered brain function), cerebral infarction (damage to a part in the brain due to a disrupted blood flow), dementia (impairment of the ability to remember, think, or make decisions that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services necessary to maintain or improve range of motion (ROM) and mobility for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 10) when the facility did not follow the physician ordered Restorative Nursing Program (RNA program-program- interventions that actively focuses on achieving and maintaining optimal physical, mental, and psychosocial functioning) frequency for active range of motion (AROM) and bed mobility exercises.This failure had the potential for Resident 10 to experience decline in ROM, decreased mobility, and failure to achieve her highest practicable well being.Findings:A review of Resident 10's clinical record indicated Resident 10 was admitted in December 2025 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where the brain does not receive enough nutrients or oxygen to function properly, leading to altered brain function), cerebral infarction (damage to a part in the brain due to a disrupted blood flow), absence of left leg below knee, and muscle weakness.A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure emergency kits (e kits) were replaced within the facility's required timeframe and failed to prevent staff from removing medications from previously opened e kits. This deficient practice had the potential to result in medications not being available when needed for residents.Findings:During an observation, inspection, and concurrent interview on 5/18/2026 at 9:34 a.m., I inspected the medication room with Supervisor Nurse (S LN). I observed three refrigerated e kits stored in the white medication refrigerator labeled Station 2. Two of the e kits had red plastic ties, indicating they had been opened, and one e kit remained sealed. I opened the two e kits with the red plastic ties for inspection. One e kit contained a log indicating it had been opened that morning. The second e kit contained two logs documenting medication removal on 5/6/26 at 2:00 p.m. and 5/17/26 at 4:16 p.m. S LN confirmed the observations and stated that e kits were required to be replaced and returned to the pharmacy within 72…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an opened foil medication pouch containing budesonide ampules (an inhaled medication used to reduce airway inflammation) for Resident 28 which was observed stored in 2B Medication Cart (one of two medication carts sampled) was labeled with the date it was opened, as required by manufacturer specifications and the facility's policies and procedures. This failure created the potential for administering expired or ineffective medication to Resident 28.Findings:During an inspection of the 2B Medication Cart on [DATE] at approximately 10:20 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN 3), an opened and undated foil pouch of budesonide prescribed for Resident 28 was observed stored in the cart. LN 3 reviewed the manufacturer's labeling on the pouch which indicated, once the foil envelope is opened, use the ampules within two weeks. Date Opened______ He stated he would discard the medication because he did not know when it expired. He acknowledged the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the prepared menu and did not meet the nutritional needs of two out of 19 sampled residents (Resident 21 and Resident 5) when staff did not serve Resident 21 and Resident 5 an 8 fl oz (fluid ounce- unit of volume used to measure liquids) of milk during 5/18/26 lunch meal. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 21 and Resident 5 not meeting and maintaining their nutritional needs and achieving their highest practicable wellbeing. Findings:1a. A review of Resident 21's clinical record indicated Resident 21 was admitted May of 2024 and had diagnoses that included diabetes (elevated sugar in the blood), severe protein-calorie malnutrition (PCM- a severe nutritional deficiency where inadequate intake of protein and calories leads to dangerous changes in body composition, function, and weight loss), and dementia (memory loss that interferes with daily functions).A review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) Cognitive Patterns, dated 2/24/26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate assistive eating utensil to one out of 19 sampled residents (Resident 85) when staff did not provide Resident 85 with a scoop plate (an adaptive, high-walled dish designed to help individuals with limited motor skills, tremors, or single-hand dexterity to eat independently) during the 5/18/26 lunch meal. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 85 being unable to independently eat properly which could have caused nutritional problems.Findings:A review of Resident 85's clinical record indicated Resident 85 was admitted December of 2022 and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions causing memory loss and confusion), dementia (memory loss that interferes with daily functions), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (PCM- a severe nutritional deficiency where inadequate intake of protein and calories leads to dangerous changes in body composition, function, and weight loss), and muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, staff failed to provide a clean environment for residents when one of three outside dumpsters did not keep waste properly contained with the lid closed.This failure created the potential for an unsafe environment due to garbage storage area not being maintained in a sanitary condition to prevent a fly, rodent, or pest infestation that could spread diseases in the facility.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 05/18/2026 at 8:35 a.m., the Food Services Director confirmed the top of one of three outside dumpsters was not closed. The Food Services Director verified that a piece of a bike from the rehab department was sticking up and out of the dumpster, preventing it from being properly closed.During an interview on 05/20/2026 at 10:25 a.m., the Food Services Director confirmed that garbage dumpsters not being closed attracted flies, bugs, and rodents. The Food Services Director confirmed the lid had not been closed.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled: Garbage and Refuse Disposal,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not follow and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for one out of 19 sampled residents (Resident 5) when a visiting hospice staff did not wear the required personal protective equipment (PPE) during high-contact care for Resident 5, who was on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP- also known as enhanced standard precaution/ESP; an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs- bacteria that resist treatment with more than one antibiotic] by targeted gown and glove use).This failure increased the risk of cross contamination and exposed Resident 5 to germs and infection.Findings:A review of Resident 5's clinical record indicated that Resident 5 was admitted in December 2025 and had diagnoses including hemiplegia (complete loss of the ability to move one side of the body) and hemiparesis (partial weakness of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (damage to a part in the brain due to disrupted blood flow) affecting the left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light system was functioning properly for 2 residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) residing in room [ROOM NUMBER]. This failure had the potential to result in residents' needs not being met and prevent residents' communication for assistance when needed. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included displaced comminuted fracture of left patella (kneecap was broken into multiple pieces and pieces were not properly aligned). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS – a federally mandated resident assessment tool), the MDS indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 2 ' s AR, the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system. During a review of Resident 2 ' s MDS, the MDS indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menu was followed for the therapeutic diets (modified diets from regular diet, tailored to fit the nutritional needs of a particular person - may be part of a treatment or medical condition and usually prescribed by a physician) during lunch on 3/12/25 when: 1. 19 Residents (Resident (3, 4, 5, 7, 22, 29, 33, 35, 47, 52, 56, 63, 66, 68, 75, 79, 82, 291, and 341) with regular portion with regular texture diets got 6 ounces (oz.) (3/4 cup) of pasta instead of 4 oz. (1/2 cup) 2. 11 residents (Resident 19, 23, 24, 30, 32, 36, 44, 57, 60, 72, and 85) with CCHO (Consistent Carbohydrate) diet (a therapeutic diet to manage diabetic disease and/or to stabilize blood sugar level) and CCHO Renal (kidney) diet (a diet to manage chronic kidney disease and diabetic disease) got one serving of dessert (lemon snow bar) and 6 oz. of pasta instead of half (1/2) serving of dessert and 4 oz. of pasta 3. Four residents (Resident 9, 34, 76, and 340) with small portion with diets received one serving of dessert,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, served, or distributed in accordance with professional standards of food serve in a safety manner when: 1. Various sizes of metal pans were found having issues stored in the clean and ready-to-use storage areas: - Stacked wet - Were not clean with food particles 2. The storage areas for storing the clean and ready-to-use metal pans were not clean 3. The blade of the can opener was not well maintained 4. Dietary Aide (DA) 1 was not able to verbalize the process of manual dishwashing by 2-compartment sink 5. DA 2 was not able to perform cleaning and sanitizing procedure correctly for the soiled food contact surface areas 6. DA 2 was not able to verbalize and demonstrate the correct procedure to prepare and test the sanitizer solution for the red bucket (red color-coded bucket is used as a standard of practice to contain sanitizer solution) 7. DA 3 did not have the hair restraint fully cover the hair 8. There were issues found for the resident's refrigerator: - Residents' food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely assistance with incontinence (a condition where a person experiences involuntary loss of urine or stool) care for four of 25 sampled residents (Resident 23, Resident 339, Resident 340, and Resident 60). This failure resulted in residents not attaining their highest practicable physical, psychosocial, and emotional well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 23's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 23 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture (a break or crack) of left femur (thigh bone). Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 2/20/25, indicated Resident 23 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident 23's self-care functional ability indicated, needed maximum assistance for toileting hygiene (helper does all the effort). The MDS indicated, he is always…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide (DA) 1 and DA 2 had the appropriate skill set to safely perform the daily operations of the food and nutrition services department when: 1. DA 1 was unable to verbalize the correct process of manual dishwashing with 2-compartment sink (cross refer to F812, #4); 2. DA 2 was unable to perform cleaning and sanitizing procedure correctly for the soiled food contact surface areas (cross refer to F812, #5), and 3. DA 2 was unable to verbalize and demonstrate the correct procedure for testing and proper temperature when preparing the sanitizer solution for the red bucket (red color-coded bucket is used as a standard of practice to contain sanitizer solution) (cross refer to F812, #6). These failures had the potential to place 88 out of 92 highly susceptible residents who consumed food from the facility at risk for food borne illness. Findings: 1. During an interview with DA 1 regarding the process of manual dishwashing by the 2-compartment sink on 3/11/25 at 8:57 a.m., DA 1 stated he would switch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were implemented when: 1. Oxygen tubing was on the floor for Resident 18, Resident 12 and Resident 36. 2. Resident 10's urinary catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) tubing was dragging on the floor while on the wheelchair. 3. Tube feeding formula was left uncapped and open to air while disconnected from Resident 45. These failures had the potential to compromise resident's health and safety, and potentially lead to the spread of communicable illnesses. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 18's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 18 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (when lungs suddenly can't get enough oxygen into the blood) and asthma (condition in which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident needs were accommodated for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 63), when the call light was not within reach. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 63 not attaining their highest practicable physical, psychosocial, and emotional well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 63's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated, Resident 63 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with multiple diagnosis of muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and history of falling. During a review of Resident 63's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 12/12/24, the MDS indicated Resident 25 required partial/moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort) with activities of daily living (ADLs- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves). During a concurrent observation and interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 25 sampled residents (Resident 58) received appropriate pain management services consistent with professional standards of practice and facility's policy and procedure (P&P) when Resident 58's pain was not managed during wound care treatment. This failure had the potential for Resident 58 not achieve relief from pain and not attain her highest practicable well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 58's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 58 was admitted to the facility March 2024 with multiple diagnoses which included sacral pressure ulcer stage 3 (full-thickness loss of skin, dead and black tissue may be visible) and chronic pain. During a review of Resident 58's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 3/5/25, the MDS indicated Resident 58's wound was documented as pressure ulcer Stage 4 (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practices for one resident (Resident 1) out of four sampled residents when staff did not use proper personal protective equipment (PPE, specialized clothing or equipment worn for protection against infectious material) when they performed wound care on Resident 1. This failure had the potential to increase the spread of infection. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in June of 2024 with diagnoses that included: chronic osteomyelitis (an infection of bone) to left radius and ulna (bones in the forearm) and bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the blood). During a review of Resident 1's Order Details (OD), dated 7/24, the OD indicated, Enhanced Barrier Precautions [EBP, extra precautions taken during high contact patient care] for: ADL's [activities of daily living], Hygiene, Toileting, Linen Change, Wound Care, Transferring/Repositioning. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/1/24 at 10 a.m., with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), LN 1 performed wound care for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse (the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish) to the State Survey Agency and local law enforcement, and the facility failed to report the results of all investigations to the State Survey Agency within five working days of the incident for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in a delayed investigation. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with medical diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (when blood flow to the brain is blocked or reduced) affecting left dominant side and exhibiting facial weakness.A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a cognitive screening tool used to assess a person's mental status) score showed 14 out of 15 (cognition intact). During a review of Resident 1's Grievance/Concern Form, dated 9/6/24, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1's) right was exercised timely when the resident's representative (RR) was not notified of Resident 1's change in condition and/or the resident's emergency transfer to a hospital. This failure resulted in RR feeling astounded and upset when the hospital contacted her regarding Resident 1's care. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record, admission Record, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included memory problem with agitation and aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech). In the resident's admission Record, Resident 1's spouse was listed as the Emergency Contact #1 and also as his Responsible Party. In a telephone interview on 7/1/24 at 3:50 p.m., the RR stated that the facility did not notify her of her husband (Resident 1's) change in condition nor his hospital transfer to the emergency department on 6/12/24. The RR stated the hospital called her the following day and only then she knew her husband was in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services according to professional standards of quality for three of 23 sampled residents (Resident 39, Resident 240 and Resident 5), when: 1. Resident 39's and Resident 240's administered oxygen was not consistent with physician's order and care plan; and 2. Resident 5 was not provided with an incentive spirometer (a medical device used to help improve lung function) as ordered by the physician. These failures decreased the facility's potential to safely follow the physician's orders when providing respiratory services and increased the residents' risk of developing lung problems. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 39's admission Record, indicated Resident 39 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary (lung) disease (COPD, lung disease that blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breathe) and acute respiratory failure (when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability and effective storage of controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse or addiction) when random controlled medication audits for three out of four residents (Residents 6, 189 and 190) did not reconcile. The medications were signed out of the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but were not documented accurately on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to indicate they were given to the residents. This failure resulted in the facility not having accurate accountability of controlled medications and potential for abuse or misuse of these medications. Findings: Resident 6 had a physician's order for tramadol (a medication to treat pain) 50 milligrams (mg, a unit of measurement), 1 tablet orally every 12 hours as needed for moderate to severe pain, dated 5/19/23. The CDR indicated 1 tablet was signed out on 2/9/24 and 2/28/24. The February 2024 MAR did not indicate their respective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 10.42% error rate when five medication errors out of 48 opportunities were observed during a medication pass for two out of five residents (Residents 5 and 189). This failure resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders, manufacturer specifications and potential to affect the residents' clinical conditions. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 3/25/24 at 8:04 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), LN 1 was observed administering medications to Resident 5, including a Trelegy Ellipta (a medication to treat asthma) 200/62.5/25 microgram (mcg, a unit of measurement) inhaler. Resident 5 inhaled 1 puff from the inhaler then sipped and swallowed his orange juice. A review of the manufacturer's specifications for the use of Trelegy Ellipta dated 12/2022 indicated, Rinse your mouth with water after you have used the inhaler and spit the water out. Do not swallow the water. During an interview on 3/25/24 at 11 a.m. with LN 1, LN 1 stated she normally instructed residents to rinse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0810 — pattern
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a special eating utensil for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 28), when Resident 28 was not provided with a rocker knife (a knife that can make it easier to cut food for one-handed individuals due to weakness or paralysis) during meals. This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide adaptive utensils designed to meet the clients' nutritional needs. Findings: A review of Resident 28's admission Record, indicated Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including left side hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of body), muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. A review of Resident 28's Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool), dated 12/30/23, indicated Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score was eight of 15 with some memory problems. MDS further indicated Resident 28 needed setup or clean-up assistance when eating. During an observation on 3/25/24 at 12:29 p.m. in the facility's dining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner for a census of 90 when: 1. Dietary staff did not use hair nets and/or beard guards while in the kitchen; 2. Several food items were opened and not dated with their open date and expired food items were in the reach-in refrigerator and dry storage; and, 3. Expired left-over roast beef with used by date 3/26/24 was available to use on 3/27/24. These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illness. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/25/24 at 7:45 a.m., the Dietary Aid (DA) was in the kitchen and was not wearing a hairnet. Later, the Kitchen Dietary Manager (KDM) entered the kitchen and was not wearing a hair net and beard guard. KDM confirmed hair net and beard guards are required while in the kitchen. Review of the facility's policy titled, Dress Code, dated 2023, indicated, Hair net for hair . beard and mustaches (any facial hair) must wear beard restraint. 2. During an observation in the reach-in refrigerator and dry storage on 3/25/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices when: 1. Dietary [NAME] 1 (DC1) did not perform proper hand hygiene practice while in the kitchen for a census of 90; and, 2. Licensed Nurse 5 (LN 5) did not change gloves and perform hand hygiene during wound care for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 140). These failures had the potential to spread infection in the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation in the kitchen and interview on 3/25/24 at 8 a.m., the DC1 entered the kitchen and performed hands washing and then pat drying using her clothes. Then DC1 washed her hands again without using hand soap, scrubbing hands less than 20 seconds. DC1 confirmed she should have washed hands with soap and water and dried with towels. During an interview on 3/27/24 at 3:14 p.m. with Food Service Efficiency Consultant (FSEC), FSEC confirmed staff must perform hand washing before providing food services. 2. According to the admission Record, Resident 140 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure self-administered medications kept at bedside for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 189) were reviewed and approved by the physician. This failure had the potential for unsafe medication use, exposure to unwanted side effects and duplication of therapy. Findings: During an observation on 3/25/24 at 9:07 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 4 (LN 4), LN 4 was observed administering medications to Resident 189. To the left of Resident 189's bed was an albuterol (a medication to treat asthma) inhaler, without a pharmacy label, on a bedside table. Resident 189 stated she had been using the inhaler to help her breathe, but it was not providing her relief. She stated she had brought the inhaler with her to the facility from the hospital. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/25/24 at 11:24 a.m. with LN 4, Resident 189's physician's orders were reviewed. LN 4 confirmed Resident 189 did not have an order for albuterol or an order that allowed the resident to self-administer medications. LN 4 stated a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's respect and quality of care were maintained for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 62) when Resident 62 was not able to reach for the call light. This failure had the potential to increase the residents' fear of not able to reach for the call light when needing assistance. Findings: According to the admission Record, Resident 62 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including asthma and left lower limb infection. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/25/24 at 9:30 a.m. in Resident 62's room, Resident 62 reported she was not able to reach for the call light while in her wheelchair. The call light was located on the other side of Resident 62's bed. During an interview on 3/28/24 at 9:11 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the call light should have been within reach of the resident. Review of the facility's policy titled, Answering the Call Light, dated 12/2022, indicated, When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 37), when Resident 37's room was disorderly and cluttered with personal bags and boxes. This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure residents' autonomy when using their personal belongings. Findings: A review of Resident 37's admission Record, indicated Resident 37 was readmitted from hospital to the facility on 2/13/24 with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, major depressive disorder, and paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body). A review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool), dated 1/6/24, indicated Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, a cognitive assessment tool) score was 15 of 15 with good memory. MDS further indicated Resident 37 had impairment on bilateral lower extremities, used a wheelchair, and was dependent in transfer to and from bed to a chair or wheelchair. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/25/24 at 9:59 a.m. with Resident 37 in her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care) was accurate for three of 23 sampled residents (Resident 70, Resident 64 and Resident 88) when: 1. Resident 70's impaired vision was not reflected in his most recent quarterly MDS assessment; 2. Resident 64's MDS indicated she had no feeding tube; and, 3. Resident 88 was discharged to home and MDS indicated hospitalization. These failures had the potential for residents to not receive appropriate care and interventions. Findings: 1. A review of an admission record indicated Resident 70 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. During an initial screening on 3/25/24 at 10:43 a.m. inside Resident 70's room, Resident 70 was observed lying in bed squinting while watching television and a pair of eyeglasses was on top of the table. Resident 70 stated the reading glasses were from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and provide the baseline care plan (BCP) and written summary for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 240) within 48 hours after admission. This failure decreased the facility's potential to address the residents' initial goals and current health needs. Findings: A review of Resident 240's admission Record, indicated Resident 240 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 240's Baseline Care Plan Person-Centered Care Planning, indicated BCP was completed on 3/19/24. BCP further indicated a printed summary was not provided to Resident 240 or her representative. During an interview on 3/26/24 at 2:14 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON confirmed Resident 240's BCP was not completed within 48 hours of admission and stated it should have been done within 48 hours because there was a potential that nurses will not have a quick tool to identify what the resident's specific focus areas are that guide their provision of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 5), when Resident 5's care plan did not address the use of an incentive spirometer (a hand held device that helps people take slow, deep breaths) and compression stockings as ordered. This failure had the potential for the order to be missed and not implemented. Findings: A review of Resident 5's medical records indicated he was admitted in May 2022 with diagnoses including pulmonary dysfunction due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems) exacerbation. A review of Resident 5's Order Summary Report, for March 2024, indicated a physician's order, dated 3/17/24, for the use of an incentive spirometer three times a day for 10 days which also placed him on a respiratory program to improve lung function. A review of Resident 5's Order Summary Report, dated 2/22/24, indicated an order for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with acceptable professional standards of quality for one of five sampled residents (Resident 189) when nursing staff failed to expel air from a syringe to ensure the full dose of heparin (a medication to treat and prevent blood clots) was administered. This failure resulted in Resident 189 receiving an incorrect dose of heparin and potential for developing blood clots leading to complications of their clinical condition. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 3/25/24 at 9:07 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 4 (LN 4), LN 4 was observed preparing ten medications for Resident 189, including heparin 5000 units/milliliter (u/ml, a unit of measurement). She withdrew medication and pulled the plunger back to the 1 milliliter (ml, a unit of measurement) measurement marker. She held the syringe up and a large bubble was observed in the syringe. The heparin in the syringe was at the 0.88 ml measurement marker with the bubble on top. LN 4 confirmed she had finished preparing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assist one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 70) with the arrangement of an eye doctor consultation. This failure had the potential for a delayed delivery of care to help improve Resident 70's vision. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 70 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood (having emotional or behavioral symptoms within 3 months of a stressful event, including nervousness, worry, feeling sad, tearful, and hopeless). During an initial screening on 3/25/24 at 10:43 a.m. inside Resident 70's room, Resident 70 was observed lying in bed squinting while watching television and a pair of eyeglasses was on top of the table. Resident 70 stated the reading glasses were from the Activities Director and they gave him headaches whenever he used them. Resident 70 added he already told the staff he needed to see an eye doctor but he had not seen one yet. A review of a social services note, dated 8/7/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician treatment order for a stage 4 pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue, exposing the tendon or bone) for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 140) when staff did not follow the treatment order for the left posterior leg as physician prescribed. This failure had the potential for the resident's current pressure ulcers to worsen. Findings: According to the admission Record, Resident 140 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including diabetes (issues regulating blood sugars; can delay wound healing) and stage 4 pressure ulcer. Review of the Order Summary Report, dated 3/28/24, indicated Resident 140 had a treatment order: stage 4 pressure injury (ulcer) to the left posterior leg, to cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, apply collagen, hydroferra blue (a powerful antibacterial wound dressing), triad (a cream to create a sterile coating for wound management) to the margin and silicone border foam dressing with skin prep (a wipe to protect the skin) to adhesive exposed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement the proper checking of a roam signal device (a device that allows sensors on doors to alarm to keep track of wandering residents) for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 56) when Licensed Nurses (LNs) took Resident 56 near a door to test its transmitter. This failure placed Resident 56 at an increased risk for elopement. Findings: A review of Resident 56's admission record indicated he was admitted in June 2022 with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia (mental illness with persistent false beliefs) and Alzheimer's disease (brain disorder that destroys memory, thinking skills, and the ability to carry out simplest task). During an initial screening on 3/25/24 at 11:28 a.m. inside Resident 56's room, observed Resident 56 wearing an alarm device to his left ankle while propelling himself out of the room towards the dining room to eat lunch. A review of an Order Summary Report, dated 12/15/23, indicated Resident 56 was ordered to use a roam signal device for exit seeking behavior. The order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fluid restriction orders for two of 23 sampled residents (Resident 139 and 77) when Resident 139's and Resident 77's water pitchers were at the bedside while on fluid restriction order. This failure had the potential for Resident 139 and Resident 77 not maintaining acceptable parameters of fluid intake. Findings: According to the admission Record, Resident 139 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including heart failure. Resident 139 was his own responsible party. Review of the Order Summary Report, dated 3/26/24, indicated Resident 139 had a fluid restriction 1500 milliliters (ml, a unit of measurement) daily. During an observation on 3/25/24 at 11:03 a.m. in Resident 139's room, Resident 139 confirmed the water pitcher was at the bedside. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/26/24 at 8:46 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) confirmed the water pitcher was on Resident 139's bedside table. According to the admission Record, Resident 77 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the routine care practice and dressing change of the midline catheter (midline-a soft, long, and sterile tube inserted into a large vein in upper arm and used for administering medications into the bloodstream) for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 76). This failure had the potential to result in serious blood stream infections causing hospitalization, organ failure, or death. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/25/24 at 8:50 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 4, Resident 76 had a midline catheter with dressing dated 3/4/24 at 5 p.m. LN 4 stated the dressing should have been changed. A review of Resident 76's Physician's Orders, dated 3/4/24, indicated to insert a midline catheter for intravenous antibiotics treatment. A review of nurse's notes dated 3/4/24, the nurse's notes indicated, .a midline insertion at left upper arm . Sterile dressing applied. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/28/2024 at 3:30 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), the Resident 76's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not stored on top of medication carts (med carts) when left unattended. The deficient practice had the potential for diversion or misuse of medications from not being stored securely. Findings: During an observation on 3/26/24 at 9:46 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 7 (LN 7), LN 7 was observed preparing medications at the med cart stationed in the hallway. LN 7 left the med cart in the hallway to attempt to locate a medication that was not inside the med cart. On top of the med cart was a bubble pack (a packaging system from the pharmacy for unit dosing medication) containing six hyoscyamine (a medication to treat excessive oral secretions) 0.125 milligram tablets. During an interview on 3/26/24 at 10:03 a.m. with LN 7, LN 7 confirmed the bubble pack that was left unattended on the med cart contained medication and was not securely stored when she had stepped away. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Administering Medication, dated April 2023, the P&P…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the competency of Food and Nutrition Services staff when: 1. Dietary [NAME] 1 (DC1) did not correctly know cooling down process; and, 2. DC1 did not know pureed consistency, did not use measurable tools/utensils, and did not use a recipe for pureed beef, vegetable, and starch. These failures to ensure staff competency for food related tasks had the potential to cause contamination of food and provide pureed food to residents with an inappropriate consistency for medical needs resulting in choking for 88 residents who received food from the kitchen out of a census of 90. Findings: 1. During an initial tour observation of the kitchen on 3/25/24 at 7:56 a.m. with Kitchen Dietary Manager (KDM), the KDM confirmed there were two pans of turkeys cooking in the oven for 3/26/24 lunch. Review the Cool Down Log, dated 3/25/24, indicated the turkey cooling down process was completed at 8 a.m. During a concurrent interview and record review of the cooling down log on 3/25/24 at 8 a.m. with DC1 and KDM, both staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in a manner to conserve nutritive value when recipes were not followed, and measurable tools/utensils were not used for pureed beef, pureed vegetable, and pureed starch. This failure had the potential to decrease the nutrients in food served and decrease food intake for five residents who received a pureed diet out of a facility census of 90. Findings: Review of the menu served for lunch on 3/27/24 and titled, Spring Cycle Menus indicated residents with a Regular texture diet received BBQ beef roast, sweet potatoes, fresh zucchini and carrots, and cheddar biscuit. Residents that were prescribed a pureed diet received pureed BBQ beef roast, sweet potatoes, fresh zucchini and carrots, and cheddar biscuit. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/27/24 at 9:18 a.m., Dietary [NAME] 1 (DC1) was pureeing beef, she used two hands to put 2 and a half hand-fulls of beef into the blender. Then she added one pitcher (about 24 oz) of beef broth into the blender to mix and blend. There was no recipe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident needs were accommodated for one of three sampled residents (Resident 17), when the call light was not answered. This failure had the potential to result in the resident not attaining his highest practicable physical, psychosocial and emotional well-being. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in early 2024 with diagnoses which included paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body), pressure sores of both heels, and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's Admission/readmission Evaluation/Assessment (A/RE/A), dated 1/3/24, the A/RE/A indicated Resident 1 had no memory impairment, had paralysis, and needed assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). During a review of Resident 1's Nursing Care Plan (NCP), dated 1/10/24, the NCP indicated, ADL/Mobility .Interdisciplinary team .has established a goal for Functional Abilities and Goals based on Prior Level of Functioning .chair/bed-to-chair transfer, eating, lower body dressing, lying to sitting on side of bed .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses demonstrated competency when one of four sampled resident's (Resident 1), urine sample was not able to be processed due to incomplete documentation of the sample collection. This failure resulted in delay in treatment of Resident 1's urinary tract infection. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in May 2023 with multiple diagnoses including fracture of right ulna (forearm bone) and right humerus, (upper arm bone), diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), and retention of urine (bladder does not empty all the way during urination). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 5/13/23, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess cognition) score of 15 out of 15 that indicated she was cognitively intact. A review of Resident 1's MDS, Bowel and Bladder, dated 5/13/23, indicated Resident 1 had an indwelling foley catheter (tube placed in the bladder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-03-28 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing information was complete and posted on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift for a census of 90, when the Staffing Coordinator (SC) posted staffing information in the afternoon without the total number and actual hours worked per shift for licensed and unlicensed staff responsible for resident care. This failure decreased the facility's potential to post complete staffing information on a daily basis for residents and visitors. Findings: During an observation on 3/25/24 at 8:10 a.m. a document titled, Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD), dated 3/23/24, was posted in the facility's main hallway beside the reception. During an observation on 3/25/24 at 11:39 a.m., the facility's staffing information for the current date was not posted. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/27/24 at 11:10 a.m. with the SC, the facility's DHPPD forms dated, 3/23/24, 3/24/24, 3/25/24, 3/26/24, and 3/27/24 were reviewed. SC confirmed all DHPPD forms did not include the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 52.9+2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HUDSON RIVER OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/05/2021
BAY BRIDGE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/05/2021
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
BLANKENFELD, KENNETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/11/2021
ZAIDI, FARAZIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/20/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$978K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 18%Medicare 20%Other / private 62%

This home reported $978K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$501per resident / day
operating cost
$15,227per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$558per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555333. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next