No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

River Valley Care Center

9000 Larkin Road, Live Oak, CA 95953 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (530) 695-8020 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (530) 695-8020 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Dec 2021Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
9970 Live Oak Blvd · (530) 695-5100 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
10153 Live Oak Blvd · (530) 617-5121 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2790 Date St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
9660 Broadway · (530) 846-2140

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.9%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.5%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.4%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%1.6%3.3%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.6%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.0%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.1%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.0%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.6%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.3%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.4%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.102.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.711.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 197 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
79.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 79.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 107 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.5%CMS range 45.7–58.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 7.5–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge79.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge79.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge70.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge80.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 5.1–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.79
RN hours/ resident / day
0.71
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.54
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.04
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.69
RN hoursweekends
32.3%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 95.7 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-20)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2021-12-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status when staff did not identify insidious weight loss (gradual, unintended, progressive weight loss over time), implement or modify a plan of care that was individualized and consistent with the resident's needs or preferences for one of four sampled residents. (Resident 19) These failures resulted in severe weight loss and put Resident 19 at risk for further health decline. Findings: Review of the policy and procedure titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, dated 2001 and revised April 2012, indicated the Dietician will review the resident's weights, following trends over time. Negative weight trends will be evaluated by the treatment team. Severe weight loss is defined as greater than 5% loss in one month, greater than 7.5% loss in three months and greater than 10% loss in six months. Information is to be analyzed by the multidisciplinary team, conclusions made, identify causes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use a resident-specific pain assessment for one resident (Resident 1) when it inaccurately assessed Resident 1's pain levels.This failure had the potential to cause Resident 1 increased pain due to improperly assessed pain levels and psychosocial harm.During a record review of facility policy titled Pain Assessment and Management dated October 2022, indicated staff were to monitor for the effectiveness of interventions. Policy also indicated cognitive, cultural, familial, or gender-specific influences on the resident's ability or willingness to verbalize pain are considered when assessing or treating pain. Policy further indicated staff were to assess pain using a consistent approach and a standardized pain assessment instrument appropriate to the resident's cognitive level.During a record review of Resident 1's admission record, she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (mental illness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was sanitary and food was stored, prepared, and distributed in accordance with food safety when: 1. The low temp dishwasher sanitizing solution did not meet manufacturer guidelines. 2. Primary handwashing skink for dietary staff was low flow and not warm. 3. Tortillas were not dated once received and were expired. 4. Dirty dishes were found placed under kitchen preparation area. 5. The lid for the dry powder thickener was kept open when not in use. 6. Thickened milk in the fridge was not dated when created. These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination and place residents at risk for developing a foodborne illness. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 6/17/25 at 9:11 am, Dietary Aide (DA) J was using the dishwasher to wash and sanitize the post breakfast dishes. DA J was asked to test the level of chemicals used for sanitization in the dishwasher with test strips. The test strip indicated that the sanitizing solution was at a level of 10 parts…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment when 10 out of 21 resident rooms in the locked unit, and one courtyard in the locked unit had the following: 1. Resident rooms 131, 133, 134, 137, 138, and 140 were observed as undecorated and not personalized to individuals. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER] was found on multiple dates as having a foul, unpleasant urine-like smell. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER] and 141 were observed to have mismatched toilet parts covered in tape, as well as other broken parts. 4. rooms [ROOM NUMBER] were observed to have patchy, or scratched off paint visible to, and near resident beds. 5. Uncovered outlets with patchy paint were found near room [ROOM NUMBER]. 6. The outdoor courtyard for locked unit had uneven pavement, dead plants, no shade, and an unpleasant appearance. 7. Several resident rooms were found to have unpleasant, sewage-like smells in bathrooms. This failure placed Residents at risk for psychosocial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, as 10 medication errors were observed out of 28 opportunities. The error rate was calculated by dividing 10 by 28 and multiplying by 100, resulting in an error rate of 35.7%. This failure led to inaccurate dosing and multiple medication errors. Findings: 1. During a record review of facility policy titled Administering Medications dated 2001, indicated medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders. Facility policy further indicated staff would check the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method of administration before giving the medication. Facility policy also indicated the expiration/beyond use date on the medication label is checked prior to administering. During a record review of Resident 46's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 6/4/25, indicated Resident 46 was prescribed Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Norco - a pain medication) 5-325 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store supplies in a medication room. This was evident in one out of two sampled medication storage rooms where unorganized products were found. Additionally, resident care supplies were found under the sink, which further indicated improper storage practices. The facility also failed to properly label resident medications in two out of four sampled medication carts. Disorganized storage of supplies and products in a nursing home can lead to medication errors, delays in treatment, and potential adverse health effects. Failing to properly label resident medications has the potential to put residents at risk for harm from receiving incorrect, expired, and potentially contaminated or ineffective medications. Findings: 1. During a record review of facility policy titled Medication Labeling dated [DATE], indicated the medication label included the expiration date as determined by the manufacturer, and resident's name. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was in the appropriate form for one of three residents (Resident 7) to meet her dietary needs. This failure had the potential for Resident 7 to aspirate (ingestion of food or fluid into the airway or lungs), choke, and have weight loss. Findings: During review of Resident 7's medical record revealed Resident 7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's, underweight, blindness, contracture (deformity and rigidity of joints) of the left hand, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Dietary Note dated 12/18/24, at 1:00 pm, indicated that Resident 7 had a food intake range of 51-75% with meals being mechanical soft (foods that are easy to chew and swallow), pureed (a creamy paste or thick liquid made from cooked food) meat, and fortified (extra calories). A review of a Dietary Note dated 4/2/25, at 10:33 am, indicated that Resident 7's food intake was 0-26% with meals being mechanical soft, pureed meat,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an infection control program was implemented by staff to reduce the spread of infection in the facility when: 1. A COVID outbreak was not reported timely to the Department of Public Health. 2. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) F did not perform hand hygiene when doing patient cares. These failures had the potential to result in the development and transmission of infectious diseases to residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: 1. A review of a facility policy titled, Unusual Occurrence Reporting, with a revised date of October 2024, indicated, Our facility will report the following events to appropriate agencies: An outbreak of any communicable disease . This policy further indicated, Unusual occurrences shall be reported . to appropriate agencies as required . Within twenty-four (24) hours of such incident . A review of a facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, with a revised date of October 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the communication call light system ( a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area) was working for five of seven residents (Residents 21, 55, 69, 81 and 440) sampled for working call lights, when these residents had been given hand bells when their call light cord broke and the Director of Maintenance (DOM) indicated she did not have time to fix their call light cords. This failure had the potential for Resident 21, 55, 69, 81, and 440, to be at risk for accidents and their care needs not being met. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Maintenance Service revised 12/2023, indicated The Maintenance Department is responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner in a practicable timeframe. A review of the DOM job description dated 2/2024, indicated Make periodic rounds to check equipment and to assure the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not accurately assess Resident 7 when the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized, comprehensive assessment to evaluate resident's health status, functional abilities, and care needs) indicated Resident 7 required partial to moderate assistance with eating; however, the care plan (a document that outlines a resident's specific goals and needs) indicated Resident 7 required extensive assistance with eating. This failure had the potential to not accurately reflect Resident 7's status, which could cause a decline in the resident's status and ability to receive proper nutrition. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled, Resident Assessments, with a revised date of October 2024, indicated, The results of the assessments are used to develop, review, and revise the resident's comprehensive care plan. A review of a facility document titled, Job Description: MDS Nurse . with a date of August 2019, indicated the essential duties of an MDS nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one resident out of three (Resident 238) within 48 hours after admission for respiratory care issues and oxygen needs. This failure had the potential for Resident 238 to not receive effective and person-centered care when no respiratory goals or interventions were included in the baseline care plan. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Care Plans - Baseline, revised October 2024, indicated, a baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forty-eight hours of admission. During an observation on 6/17/25 at 11:17 am, in Resident 238's room, there was an oxygen concentrator administering oxygen to Resident 238 via nasal cannula (a thin, flexible tube that wraps around your head, typically hooking around your ears. On one end, it has two prongs that sit in your nose and deliver oxygen. The other end of the tube connects to an oxygen supply). Resident 238 was observed to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-center care plan for one of four residents (Resident 26) sampled for care plans, to reflect Resident 26's required need of the assistance of two helpers with Activity of Daily Living (ADL's, which included turning resident in bed, bathing, and changing her brief [incontinent underwear that absorb urine and feces]). This failure had the potential to lead to inaccurate provision of care and adverse health outcomes for Resident 26. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive reviewed 9/2024, indicated A comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. 1. The care plan interventions are derived from analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive care plan will: .b. Describe the services that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide Resident 7 with extensive assistance while eating her lunch, as deemed necessary by her care plan (a document that outlines a resident's specific goals and needs). This failure had the potential to foster a decrease in the resident's participation in her activities of daily living (ADLs) to maintain good nutrition. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, with a revised date of August 2024, indicated, Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) as practicable as possible. Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition A review of a facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive, with a reviewed date of September 2024, indicated, A comprehensive care plan that includes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an evaluation and documentation, of a red area, was completed for one of two residents (Resident 26) sampled for skin conditions, when Resident 26 was identified to have a red area on her bottom on admission but there was no further documentation about the red area for the next three weeks. This failure had the potential for Resident 26's skin condition to become worse and cause significant pain and negative clinical outcomes. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Prevention of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries revised September 2024, indicated Monitoring 1. Evaluate, report and document potential changes in the skin. A review of Resident 26's admission record indicated, Resident 26 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after a hospital stay, with diagnoses that included respiratory failure with hypoxia (lack of oxygen to the brain), pneumonitis (lung infection) due to inhalation of food and vomit, Dysphagia (difficulty with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one of nine sampled residents (Resident 79) reviewed for accidents and hazards when Resident 79 was found to have nine razors and one pair of tweezers in her room. This failure had the potential for Resident 79 to cause physical and psychosocial harm to herself and to other residents in the secured unit. Findings: During a record review of facility policy titled Safety and Supervision of Residents dated October 2024, indicated employees shall be trained in potential accident hazards, how to identify and report accident hazards, and try to prevent avoidable accidents. Facility policy further indicated that resident supervision is a core component of the systems approach to safety. The type and frequency of resident supervision is determined by the individual resident's assessed needs and identified hazards in the environment. During a record review of Resident 79's admission record, Resident 79 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three dietary aides (responsible for dishwashing) was competent on the use of the three-compartment sink (used in food services to properly wash, rinse, and sanitize dishes and utensils) procedure for manual dish washing in the kitchen. This failure placed all residents at risk for cross contamination and acquiring food-borne illnesses. Findings: A review of the facility policy titled Manual Warewashing [dishes and utensils], revised 10/2022, indicated all cookware, dishware, and serviceware that is not processed through the dish machine will be manually washed and sanitized (using chemicals to kill bacteria). The dining service staff will be knowledgeable in proper technique including: - Soap dispensing. - Wash temperature at no less then 110 degrees Fahrenheit. - Chemical sanitizing dispensing. - Chemical sanitizer testing and concentration. Appropriate test strips will be utilized to measure the concentration of the sanitizer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-17 · tag F0841 — widespread
    Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Medical Director (MD) supervised the development and implementation of mitigating a scabies outbreak that effected 31 residents. This failure resulted in a six-month scabies outbreak in the facility. Findings: A review of Medical Directorship Agreement, dated 01/01/2019 indicates the MD is involved at all levels of individualized patient care and supervision, and for all persons served by the facility. The MD services as the clinician who oversees and guides the care that is provided'. The MD is responsible for coordinating of medical care in the facility to ensure that adequate and appropriate medical services are provided to the patients in the facility, reviewing incidents and accidents in the facility to identify hazards to human health and safety, serving as a member of the infection control committee at the facility. A review of alert charting, dated 04/05/2024 at 11:05 pm indicated a new order for permethrin 5% topical cream (a cream to treat scabies) for possible scabies treatment needs to be done…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-17 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI - a quality management program which takes a systematic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and data-driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality) when the committee did not develop, implement, and identify performance improvement activities related to a scabies outbreak. Refer to F 880 and F 658. This resulted in 31 residents and all staff, vendors, and visitors being at risk for exposure to scabies. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program revised February 2020, indicated this facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI Program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents. Policy Interpretation and Implementation The objectives of the QAPI Program are to provide a means to measure current and potential indicators for outcomes of care and quality of life. Provide a means to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the services provided for one of 31 residents (Resident 2) met professional standards of quality during an outbreak of scabies. This resulted in a widespread scabies outbreak over a six-month period and caused pain and suffering for all residents affected by the skin sores. Findings: A review of Resident 2's medical record indicated they was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia, adult failure to thrive, prediabetes, and major depressive disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment) dated 04/12/2024, indicated Resident 2 has severe cognitive impairment. Resident 2 has a responsible party (RP) who makes health care decision for them. A review of skin/wound charting, dated 04/01/2024 at 1:03 pm, indicated Wound Doctor (WD) was in the facility to assess skin excoriation (a wound or scratch caused by picking at the skin) to back, chest and legs for Resident 2. WD ordered clobetasol 0.05%…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify a scabies (a highly contagious skin infestation caused by human itch mites that causes intense itching of the skin) outbreak, implement appropriate precautions, monitor the effectiveness of the corrective actions and prevent further transmission when: 1. The facility's surveillance system (line listing that tracks infectious outbreaks) was incomplete. 2. Infection control committee did not monitor the scabies outbreak and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken. 3. The nursing and housekeeping department did not implement appropriate precautions to prevent spread of scabies outbreak. 4. The staff were not trained in infection prevention and control practices to prevent further spread of scabies outbreak. 5. The facility did not take appropriate steps to diagnose and manage the resident scabies cases for two of the 31 residents. This resulted in a scabies outbreak from April to August 2024 which affected 31 residents and one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety measures were provided to prevent accident hazards for three of five residents sampled for accidents (Resident 1, 4, 8) when the wheels attached to the headboard of the bed were not locked. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the residents' well-being and increased the risk of accidents or injuries to the residents. Findings: During a review of U.S. Food & Drug (FDA) document titled, A Guide to Bed Safety Bed Rails in Hospitals, Nursing Homes and Home Health Care: The Facts , revised 4/2010 , indicated that to meet the patients' needs for safety, keep the bed in the lowest positions with wheels locked was one of the recommended practices. During a review of the American Parkinson Disease Association (APDA) website document titled, Impaired Balance and Falls in people with Parkinson's Disease , dated 6/8/21, indicated, One of the most challenging symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) that fundamentally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-06 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) with dignity and respect when direct care staff made Resident 1 wear an incontinent brief and would not take Resident 1 to the bathroom for toileting. This failure had the potential to result in emotional stress, anger, embarrassment, feelings of neglect, and the potential for negative clinical outcomes. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy revised 2/2021, titled, Dignity, indicated each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and esteem. This policy also indicated residents are treated with respect and dignity at all times. The facility culture supports dignity and respect for residents by honoring resident goals, choices, preferences, values, and beliefs. This process starts with the initial admission and continues throughout the resident's facility stay. Individual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a complete comprehensive care plan was developed for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) to reflect current individual needs upon admission when: 1-Resident 1 did not have restrictions listed for staff to not use Right arm for blood pressures or any procedures for Resident 1's Right arm due to a previous mastectomy (a surgical operation to remove a breast). 2-Resident 1 did not have weight bearing restrictions listed on the care plan after a Right hip surgery. 3-Resident 1 had no interventions to monitor surgical incision site to right leg with 13 staples every shift for signs and symptoms of infection. This failure resulted in Resident 1's individual care needs to go unrecognized, and the potential for a further decline in Resident 1's physical, mental, and psychological status. Findings: 1. During a review of the facility's policy revised 3/2022, titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, indicated a comprehensive,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility nursing staff failed to get one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) out of bed (OOB) following a hip surgery and per Resident 1's right to get OOB per request for seven consecutive days. This failure had the potential to result in emotional stress, anger, embarrassment, feelings of neglect, and the potential for negative clinical outcomes related to surgical complications of immobility for seven days. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy revised 2/2021, titled, Dignity, indicated each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and esteem. This policy also indicated residents are treated with respect and dignity at all times. The facility culture supports dignity and respect for residents by honoring resident goals, choices, preferences, values, and beliefs. This process starts with the initial admission and continues throughout the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility nursing staff failed to complete and accurately document medical records for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) for activities of daily living (ADLs, basic tasks completed every day that include personal hygiene or grooming, bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring or ambulating, and eating). This failure of incomplete documentation had the potential for resident needs to not be identified or met which could have a negative clinical outcome. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy revised 7/2017, titled, Charting and Documentation, indicated all services provided to the resident, progress towards care plan goals, or changes in the residents' medical, physical, functional, or psychosocial condition shall be documented in the residents' medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. During a review of the facility's policy revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 had a change in condition in a timely manner. This resulted in Resident 1 not receiving timely evaluation and treatment . Findings: During a record review of document titled admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 1 had a history of congestive heart failure (the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body ' s needs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), type II diabetes (where the body cannot regulate blood sugar levels), and brain tumor. During a record review of document titled Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) status was Do-Not-Resuscitate. During a record review of facility policy titled Change in Resident ' s Condition or Status 2001 MED-PASS, a facility shall notify .attending physician on call .when there has been a significant change in the resident ' s…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide timely and accurate discharge planning for one of three residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was not given a 30-day notice of discharge and no physician order was received to initiate discharge planning. This failure resulted in the potential of an unsafe discharge for Resident 1 and caused him anxiety. Findings: During a record review of document titled admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 1 had a history of congestive heart failure (the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body ' s needs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), type II diabetes (where the body cannot regulate blood sugar levels), and brain tumor. Resident 1 ' s Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) status was Do-Not-Resuscitate. Resident 1 ' s Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, scores on a scale of 0-15 the mental ability of an individual with 15 being the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure they accurately coded the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 4 (Residents #49, #81, #59 and #58) of 6 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Assessments revised in October 2023, revealed A comprehensive assessment of each resident is completed at intervals designated by OBRA regulations and PPS requirements from the Minimum Data Set (MDS) is submitted to the Internet Quality Improvement Evaluation System (iQIES) as required. The policy revealed, 9. Members of the care team participate in the resident assessment process. 10. Assessments are completed by staff members who are knowledgeable about the resident's needs. 11. Persons who have competed any portion of the MDS resident assessment form must sign the document attesting to the accuracy of such information. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #49 on 02/18/2021. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure they implemented the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Residents #58) of 23 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. Specifically, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions to prevent Resident #58 from wandering into other resident's rooms. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive, last reviewed by the facility in October 2023, revealed, A comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #58 on 03/19/2021. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of moderate dementia with psychotic disturbance, recurrent major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, disorientation, and unspecified intellectual disabilities. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide medically-related social services by failing to identify the need for a guardian for 1 (Resident #47) of 23 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Social Services, revised 10/2010, indicated, Our facility provides medically-related social services to assure that each resident can attain or maintain his/her highest practicable physical, mental or psychosocial well-being. The policy revealed, 4. The social services department is responsible for: f. Making referrals to social service agencies as necessary or appropriate. and k. Working with individuals and groups in developing supportive services for residents according to their individual needs and interests. A facility document titled, Job Description Social Services Director, prepared 03/2017, indicated, Provide medically related social services so that the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident is attained or maintained. The job description revealed, Assist residents with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have behavior monitoring for the use of an antianxiety medication, document non-pharmacological interventions prior to the use of an antianxiety medication, and have a specific duration for the use of an as-needed (PRN; pro re nata) antianxiety medication for 1 (Resident #27) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, revised 10/2023, specified, Psychotropic medications will be prescribed by the physician/nurse practitioner as warranted with the goal of providing quality of life. The policy also indicated, 6. The need to continue PRN orders for psychotropic medications requires that the practitioner document the rationale for the extended order. 7. The staff will observe, document, and report to the Physician/Nurse Practitioner information regarding the effectiveness of any interventions, including psychotropic medications. The policy also indicated, 8. Nursing staff shall monitor for and report any side effects and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have a medication error rate less than 5 percent (%) with a medication error rate of 13.79%. The facility had four medication errors out of 29 opportunities affecting 2 (Resident #10 and Resident #33) of 4 residents reviewed during the medication administration task. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 10/2023, specified, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed The policy indicated, 2. Medications are administered in accordance with prescribed orders, including any required time frame. The policy revealed, 4. Medications are administered within one (1) hour before and (1) hour after the prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders). The policy indicated, 7. The individual administering the medication checks the label to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program to prevent the transmission/development of infection for 1 (Resident #8) of 7 residents reviewed for infection control. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that staff implemented enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for Resident #8. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Multidrug-Resistant Organisms [MDRO]; Infection Precaution & Enhanced Standard Precautions, revised 03/2024, revealed, a. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #8 on 03/27/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and diabetes. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/28/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to meet this requirement when a blood draw tourniquet (a device that is used to apply pressure to a limb or extremity in order to stop the flow of blood) remained on a resident (Resident 1 ' s) for an estimated six hours unnoticed and unattended to. This resulted in Resident 1 ' s hand being swollen and red, and had the potential for serious injury. Findings A review of Resident 1's clinical record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia (memory and mental function loss), diabetes, communication deficits (inability to speak), and muscle weakness. On 3/27/24 at 1:45 PM, Resident 1 was observed to have a phlebotomy (blood draw) tourniquet around his wrist, tied tightly in a slip knot. The tourniquet was observed to be pressing deeply into Resident 1 ' s skin; his fingers were red and swollen. There were no staff present in Resident 1 ' s room. No staff were observed to come into his room by 1:50 PM. In a concurrent interview and observation on 3/27/24 at 1:50 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician in a timely manner for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's urinalysis (UA, a urine specimen that determines if there is a bacterial infection in the urine) results were not obtained as ordered by the physician on 11/9/2023. The facility notified the physician that the above order was not completed on 11/17/23, seven days later. The facility failed to notify the physician in a timely manner when the second UA was sent on 11/17/2023 and the Urine Culture (a lab test to check for bacteria or other germs in a urine sample) was received on 11/19/2023. The physician was notified on 11/22/2023, three days later. These failures prevented Resident 1's attending physician from having the necessary information to determine the need to alter Resident 1's treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, indicated that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included end…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's plan of care for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 had a new physician's order for wound care treatment that was not entered to Resident 1's treatment administration record (TAR). This resulted in Resident 1 not receiving treatments as ordered by the physician and had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's physical wellbeing. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, indicated that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis), dependence on renal dialysis (the process of removing excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally), diabetes (high blood glucose), and muscle weakness. Resident 2 was her own health care decision maker. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and observation, this regulation was not met when two of seven sampled residents (Residents 2 and 3) received wilted, discolored salad. This resulted in the salad appearing unapalatable to both residents and did not meet the facility's policy for food storage. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Procedure for Refrigerated Storage indicated that Produce will be delivered frequently and rotated in the order it is delivered to assure that a fresh product is used, free of any wilting or spoilage. In an interview on 10/2/23 at 12:07 PM, Family Member 1 (FAM 1) stated that on 9/23/23 a wilted salad was served to Resident 2, her mother. FAM 1 stated that the lettuce appeared brown along its cut edges; the salad appears wilted. FAM 1 stated the salad was not fit to eat. In an interview/concurrent record review on 10/9/23 at 12:35 PM, Assistant Kitchen Supervisor A stated that a wilted/brown salad should never have gone out like that because it is unappealing. In an interview on 10/9/23 at 2:15, Resident 3 stated that there had been a brown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment in the kitchen when: 1. There were boxes of food in the walk-in refrigerator and freezer that were not stored off the floor. 2. There was an opened box of kernel corn in the freezer. 3. There was stored food items that were undated. This failure had the potential for cross-contamination of bacteria or other microorganisms (very small organisms undetected by the eyes) to be unintentionally transferred to other surfaces and the food with a harmful effect causing food-borne illnesses for 88 residents. Findings: A policy titled, Storage of Food and Supplies dated 2017 and 2018, indicated, all food and food containers are to be stored six inches off the floor and on clean surfaces in a manner that protects it from contamination. All food will be dated-month, day, year. A review of staff competencies titled, Dietary Services Competency Pre-Test, for Dietary Staff dated 2021, indicated, food products should be labeled with the date, month, and year. A review of staff competencies titled, Safe Food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient and competent nursing staff to implement the plan of care for three of 46 sampled residents (Residents 19, 78 and 86), and five out of six confidential resident interviews when: 1. Resident 78 rolled out of bed while not having enough assistance during bed mobility (repositioning). This failed practice resulted in hospitalization for treatment of a fractured right femur. 2. Resident 19 did not have enough mealtime assistance and meal intake documentation was not accurate. This resulted in severe unplanned weight loss. 3. Resident 86 waited an extended period of time for her call light to be answered, resulting in her sitting in wet briefs for three and a half hours and embarrassment. 4. Confidential interviews indicated slow call light response. This had the potential for all resident needs not be met. 5. Oxygen equipment was not replaced by multiple staff after it was found on the floor. This put her at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Findings: A review of facility policy titled, Antipsychotic Medication Use, revised April 2007, indicated diagnoses alone do not warrant the use of an antipsychotic unless the following criteria are met: the behavioral symptoms present a danger to the resident or others which may include inconsolable or persistent distress for example continuous screaming and one or both of the following, symptoms are identified as being to mania or psychosis or behavioral interventions have been attempted and included in the plan of care. Based on assessing the resident's symptoms and overall situation the physician will determine whether to continue, adjust or stop existing antipyschotic medication. A review of facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, revised March 2018, indicated residents will only receive psychotropic medications when necessary to treat a specific condition, diagnosed and documented in the medical record. The physician and other staff will gather and document information to clarify the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store wasted medications in a secure container when discarded medications in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] were not securely stored or destroyed. This failure resulted in unsecured medication waste being accessible to licensed nursing staff. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled, Medication Storage, revised 2019, indicated, Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are destroyed. During an interview with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) in Med room [ROOM NUMBER], on 12/01/2021 at 9:40 AM, DSD stated all wasted narcotics and controlled substances were stored by the Director of Nursing (DON), and all other medications that were wasted were stored in an incineration box in Med room [ROOM NUMBER]. In a concurrent observation, it was noted the incineration box was a tall blue sharps (needles and syringes) bin with a wide unsecured opening on the top of the bin. It was observed that some medications at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and review of facility documents, the facility failed to provide food and drinks at a palatable temperature for four residents in a confidential interview and four sampled residents (Resident 48, 76, 83 and 295). These failures have the potential to lead to residents experiencing decreased pleasure and lead to negative clinical outcomes and further compromising the nutritional and medical status of residents. Findings: 1. Resident 48's record was reviewed. Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, open wound of abdominal wall, and Obesity. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident assessment) dated 9/28/21 indicated, that Resident 48 was cognitively intact (able to think and reason). During an interview on 11/29/21 at 9:00 a.m., with Resident 48, Resident 48 stated the eggs are cold and the toast is chewy most mornings. 2. Resident 76's record was reviewed. Resident 76 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to identify and implement plans of action to correct deficiencies for: 1. Resident 19's severe unplanned weight loss. These failures resulted in severe weight loss for Resident 19 at put her at risk for further health decline. Refer to F692. 2. Dietary services did not meet the nutritional needs of the residents. These dietary service failures put all residents for nutritional deficits that could contribute to possible unplanned with loss and health decline. Refer to F803, F804, F806, and F908. Findings: Review of the facility's 2021 Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, not dated, indicated the facility would take a proactive approach to continually improve care for residents. The facility would provide nutritious meals under the supervision of a licensed dietician, and consider resident choices and preferences for meals. The facility would put systems in place to monitor care and services, drawing data from multiple sources. The QAPI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record reiew, the facility failed to provide toileting care and proper storage of soiled clothing for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 86) when Resident 86 was left to wait in her soiled briefs for four hours and her soiled pajama pants were found in the resident's closet on top of her clean clothes. This failure resulted in Resdient 86 experiencing avoidable incontinence (loss of bladder control), and feeling wet and embarassed. Findings: A review of Resident 86's record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses that included of diabetes mellitus (when the body does not produce enough insulin and blood sugar levels can be abnormally high) and depression. Resident 86 was her own decision maker and used a wheelchair for mobility. Resident 86 had intact cognition (able to think and reason) and required assistance with toileting, personal hygeine, mobility and dressing. A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment) dated 10/22/2021, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and clean environment when: 1. Damaged ceiling tiles were observed in the laundry area and facility hallway. 2. Accumulated dust and lint was observed on the flat surfaces of the washers in the laundry area. These failures had the potential to compromise fire safety, allowing flames to penetrate through holes in the ceiling tiles in the event of a fire, and microorganisms to grow in the accumulated dust and lint. Findings: 1. Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, dated 3/9/2021, indicated the facility maintenance staff would conduct daily, weekly and monthly rounds. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/01/2021 at 10:50 a.m. with Maintenance Director (MAINT), laundry and linen processing area was observed. A ceiling tile just inside the door was observed to be out of place with an approximate half inch crack. MAINT confirmed the out of place tile, and stated it was a fire safety issue. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/02/21 at 8:15 a.m. with MAINT, broken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for one of six residents (Resident 68) when she had a hematoma (clotted blood that forms from an injury) to her left temple and an abrasion (scrape) to her left middle finger that required evaluation at the hospital. This had the potential for delaying investigations into injuries of unknown origin by facility and required reporting agencies to be able to rule out abuse. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, revised December 2016, indicated the facility will develop and implement policies and procedures to aid our facility in preventing abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of their residents. Under reporting, all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown origin source will be reported to the administrator to the following person or agencies, the State licensing/certification agency responsible for licensing the facility. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 88 sampled residents (Resident 83) received treatment and care related to physical, occupational, and behavioral restorative therapies and not honor resident choices. This failures had the potential to result in Resident 83 not receiving individualized care needed to maintain his highest level of well-being. Findings; Resident 83's record was reviewed. Resident 83 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), neck fracture, and anxiety. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident assessment) dated 11/19/21, indicated that Resident 83 was cognitively (ability to think and reason). During a review of Resident 83's Physician Order dated May 2021, the physician order indicated, the Nursing Rehabilitation Nurse (RNA) would apply a brace to both hands and feet seven days a week and Passive Range of Motion (PROM, someone helps move the arms and legs)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance to prevent avoidable accidents for one of 46 sampled residents (Resident 78), when Resident 78 rolled off her bed while being assisted by staff with bed mobility (moving from a lying position, turning from side to side, or positioning the resident while in bed). This failure resulted in Resident 78 sustaining a right femur (upper bone of the leg) fracture, and placed Resident 78 and other residents in the facility at risk of harm from potential injury, when being assisted with bed mobility without sufficient staff. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, revised March 2018, indicated a resident's ability to perform ADL's would be measured using clinical tools, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool). Review of Resident 78's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-07 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered laboratory (lab) blood tests were implemented for one of five residents (Resident 18). This failure had the potential for Resident 18 to not receive timely treatment and/or adjustment to the medication which may cause an adverse side effect. Findings: A review of Resident 18's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's dementia and hypothyroidism (slow metabolism may require hormone replacement therapy). A review of the physician's orders for 11/2021, indicated Resident 18 was prescribed Synthroid (hormone replacement) 100 micrograms once daily for hypothyroidism, and Depakote (used for behaviors related to dementia) 125 milligrams once a day a bedtime. A review of the lab order dated 2/25/2021, indicated Resident 18 was to have a Complete Blood Count (CBC, blood test to check overall health) platelets (blood clotting cells) , and a comprehensive metabolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed on 12/1/21 when greater than 5 residents on puree and mechanical soft diets received incorrect portion sizes for the small, regular, and large portion diets. These failures have the potential for residents to receive the wrong caloric intake when not following the menu, which could result in over nutrition or undernutrition, can result in the substitutes not being equal of nutritive value which may result in a significant weight loss and further compromising the nutritional and medical status of residents. Findings: 1. The Pureed Diet is used for individuals who have difficulty chewing and/or swallowing. Any foods from the regular diet that can be appropriately pureed should be included in this diet. Procedures should be developed for pureeing food to provide correct and adequate portions equivalent in nutritional value to the portions used in a regular diet (Maryland Department of Health, 2014). 2. The Mechanical Soft (Dental) Diet modifies the consistency of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed on 12/1/21 when: 1) One sampled resident (Resident 1) was not offered a protein-based substitute of similar nutritive value for eggs. 2) One sampled resident (Resident 76) was not able to receive coffee with her morning meal when repeatedly requested. 3) One sampled resident (Resident 295) was not able to receive coffee with her noon meal when repeatable requested. Failure to provide food in accordance with resident preferences may result in decreased meal satisfaction, substitutes not being equal of nutritive value, over all caloric intake, and may result in a significant weight loss and further compromising the nutritional and medical status of residents. Findings: The Vegetarian Diet is a modification of the regular diet. The diet predominantly composed of plant foods and may or may not include eggs and dairy. The vegetarian Diet should provide a variety of foods that ensure adequate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to replace a contaminated oxygen mask (mask worn over the mouth and nose) for one two sampled residents when Resident 46's oxygen mask and tubing was found on the floor. This failure placed Resident 46 at risk for infection. Findings: Review of the admission record indicated Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a disease that affects the lungs, making it hard to breath over time). Review of the General Order dated 9/24/2021, indicated Resident 46 was to be placed on two liters of oxygen as needed. Review of the General Order dated 10/18/2021, indicated Resident 46 had an order for ipratropium-albuterol 0.5 milligram-3 milligram respiratory treatments (liquid medication that is breathed into the lungs with use of a machine and oxygen mask) every six hours for shortness of breath. During an observation on 11/30/2021 at 8:42 am, Resident 46 had a respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the plate warmer was in full operational capacity. This failure resulted in three sampled residents (Resident 48,76, and 83) and four residents in a confidential interview with the potential for all 84 of the facility's residents to get served cold food at a unpalatable temperature, leading to residents experiencing decreased pleasure and further compromising the nutritional and medical status of residents. Findings: Resident 48's record was reviewed. Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included difficulty walking, open wound of abdominal wall, and obesity. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident assessment) dated 9/28/21 indicated, that Resident, 48 was cognitively intact (able to think and reason). During an interview on 11/29/21 at 9:00 a.m., with Resident 48, Resident 48 stated the eggs are cold and the toast is chewy most mornings. Resident 76's record was reviewed. Resident 76 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
VEMULAPALLI, SHAILAJAIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/11/2022
ANDRUS, ROMANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/01/2022
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 25%Medicare 16%Other / private 59%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$420per resident / day
operating cost
$12,777per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$412per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555535. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next