Loma Linda Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 118 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 101 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 78.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.41 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was protected from financial exploitation (the illegal or improper use of a person's money, property, or assets) for one of three residents (Resident 1) reviewed for allegations of financial abuse when Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) attempted to add Resident 1's debit card to the CNA's Apple Pay account. This failure had the potential to placed Resident 1 at risk for financial loss and misappropriation of personal property.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (clinical record containing demographic and admission information), the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dislocation of the left knee (a knee joint that was forced out of its normal position), fractures of the upper and lower right fibula (breaks in the smaller bone of the lower leg), anxiety (a condition causing excessive worry or fear), and depression (a mood disorder causing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dishwashing equipment and food serving utensils were kept in a sanitary condition when:1. The dish drying racks were found to be unsanitary.2. Three scoops stored in a clean storage drawer were found to have dry food particles sticking on the inside part of the scoops.3. Four (4) bags of wheat tortilla were found in the refrigerator past expiration date of June 25, 2025.These failures had the potential to cause cross-contamination of food prepared in the kitchen which can cause severe illness and even be fatal for the 77 vulnerable residents who resided at the facility.Findings:1. During the dishwasher area inspection on July 1, 2025, at 9:42 AM, the dish drying racks (sanitized dishes are placed on these dish racks to air dry) were observed to have significant amount of black-colored substance build-up, scratches, cracks and corrosions in the interior and exterior walls and on the supporting pillars of the drying racks.During an interview with the Director of Kitchen 1 (DOK 1) on July 1, 2025, at 9:50…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to update Resident 30's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - a federally mandated program that requires all individuals seeking admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility to be screened to ensure individuals who are identified to have a significant mental illness [SMI], intellectual or developmental disability [I/DD] are not inappropriately placed in skilled nursing facilities for long term care) when Resident 30 did not have his diagnoses of major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder included in the PASARR assessment used to admit Resident 30 into the skilled nursing facility.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 30 being not accurately assessed regarding the need for supplemental treatment and services to better suite the needs of Resident 30.Findings:During a review of Resident 30's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the admission Record, indicated Resident 30 was admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0646 — isolated
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Mental Health authority or the State Intellectual Disability authority of a resident's new mental illness diagnosis, when on December 3, 2024, Resident 31 was newly diagnosed with Paranoid Schizophrenia ( a mental disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly).This failure had the potential to prevent Resident 31 to receive specialized care and services.Findings:A review of the face sheet (contains demographic information) reveals that Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include bipolar disorder (a mental health condition characterized by significant and persistent shifts in mood, energy, and activity levels), unspecified dementia (a group of conditions that cause a progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment ) with other behavioral disturbance, and post-traumatic stress disorder (a mental health condition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physical therapy services were provided to one of two residents (Resident 35) sampled for rehabilitative and restorative services when Resident 35 did not receive physical therapy four times a week as ordered by the physician.This failure had the potential to contribute to a delay in Resident 35's ability to reach his highest level of physical functioning.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on June 30, 2025, at 1:08 PM, Resident 35 was lying in bed. When asked how his physical therapy was going, Resident 35 stated he did not think he was receiving physical therapy as often as he was supposed to.During a review of Resident 35's Physical Therapy Medicare PT [physical therapy] Evaluation & Plan of Treatment (outlines resident current level of functioning, diagnoses, goals and physical therapy treatment plan), dated May 19, 2025, the plan indicated Resident 35's start of care date was May 19, 2025, and Resident 35 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (the final,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided nutritional services to one of one sampled residents (Resident 49) reviewed for dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys no longer function) when Resident 49 was not provided a sack lunch on multiple days in May 2025, and June 2025.This failure had the potential for Resident 49 to experience undesirable weight loss.Findings:During a review of Resident 49's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the admission Record, indicated Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood as well as they should), dependence on renal dialysis (the state where an individual's kidneys have permanently failed and they require regular dialysis treatments to sustain life), anemia in chronic kidney disease (condition in which the body does…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff provide a complete pain assessment when a Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3) and a Registered Nurse Supervisor 1 (RNS 1) were observed not performing a complete pain assessment during an emergency for Resident 278 who was experiencing chest pain.This failure had the potential to cause Resident 278 to experience a decline in health status and function.Findings:A record review of Resident 278's Face Sheet (a document which contains basic information about the resident) indicated Resident 278 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included presence of prosthetic heart valve (an artificial valve implanted to replace a damaged or diseased heart valve), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (a condition where the upper chambers of the heart beat irregularly and rapidly), and hypertension (high blood pressure).During an observation On July 2, 2025, at 5:28 AM, A certified nursing assistant informed licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided assessment and monitoring for one of one sampled residents (Resident 49) reviewed for dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys no longer function) when there was no documented evidence staff assessed Resident 49's dialysis access site (the location where a dialysis machine is connected to a patient) after Resident 49 dialysis procedure on June 14, 2025, and June 17, 2025. This failure had the potential for a delay in the staff identification and subsequent treatment of possible dialysis associated complications such as symptoms of infection, bleeding or dislodgement of the dialysis access site for Resident 49. Findings:During a review of Resident 49's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the admission Record, indicated Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease (a condition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals stored in the facility were not expired when on July 2, 2025, three over-the-counter bottles of medications were found to be stored in the medication storage room past their expiration date. This failure had the potential for the expired medications to be accessed and administered to a vulnerable population of 77 residents, potentially resulting in altered effectiveness of the medication and worsening of the residents' symptoms, requiring medical intervention.Findings:On July 2, 2025, at 7:21 AM during the inspection of the medication storage room, three over the counter bottles of expired medications were found stored in a medication cabinet: Simethicone ( a medication used for gas) expired January 2025, Vitamin A - expired June 2024, and Vitamin B complex - expired September 2024.During an interview with the Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) on July 2, 2025, at 7:25 AM, the RNS acknowledged that the Simethicone, Vitamin A, and Vitamin B complex medications were expired and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent avoidable accidents for one of three sampled residents (Resident1). When Resident 1 fell out of bed. This failure contributed to Resident 1 being sent out to acute hospital for evaluation. Findings: During review of Residents 1's admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include: pulmonary edema (excess fluid in lungs), abnormalities of gait and mobility, hypertension (high blood pressure), acute and chronic respiratory failure (lungs cannot exchange oxygen properly), colon cancer (cancer in rectum). During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 1's Medical Record with the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed and verified the following: 1. Fall risk assessment on admission March 28, 3025, High Risk=18. 2. Careplan: Falls: Resident is at risk for falls with or without injury related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $355K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA