Marysville Post-Acute
1617 Ramirez Street, Marysville, CA 95901 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 86 certified beds · (530) 742-7311 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.2% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.9% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.4% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.8% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.4% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.2% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.29 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.29 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 155 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 82.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.5%CMS range 33.3–53.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 8.1–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 82.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 80.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 67.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 89.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.7%CMS range 5.6–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.29 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 83.3 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received supervision to prevent falls for one of four residents sampled for falls (Resident 1). Resident 1 was assessed as high risk for falls and the Interdisciplinary team (IDT) (a facility group composed of a physician, a registered nurse, a social worker and additional appointed facility staff) did not revise Resident 1's fall care plan interventions based on Resident 1's fall risk factors and resident-centered needs to include increased supervision following 14 falls between 8/7/24 and 9/13/24. These failures resulted in Resident 1 having avoidable falls which resulted in hospitalization on 8/19/24 for bleeding in her brain, and caused bruising to the bridge of her nose, left eye, a laceration (a cut or tear in the skin and underlying tissues that can be caused by blunt force trauma), a raised lump to the left temporal region (behind the ear), and a chipped front tooth on 9/13/24. Findings: A review of the facility policy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their wound prevention, maintenance, and wound care policies and procedures (P&P) for three out of three sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) when: 1A. Resident 1 was provided wound care without a physician's order; and 1B. Skin assessments did not consistently reflect the condition of the skin or wound, and the discharge skin assessment was not completed; and 1C. A change of condition was not documented; and 2. Residents 1, 2, and 3 were not provided with repositioning every two hours. These failures contributed to Resident 1's wound development and placed residents at an increased risk for a delay in wound healing, decline in health status, and could negatively impact their psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1A. A review of the facility's P&P titled, Wound Care, indicated, a physician's order was required prior to wound care being provided. A review of the admission Record, dated 6/1/25, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure discharge planning needs were met for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Resident 1 and his wife (CG, caregiver) were not provided required instructions or education on how to properly care for a wound; and 2. Resident 1 was not discharged from the facility with home health services (care provided in the home to include a nurse who would perform wound care, assessments, and education on wound care and dressing changes). This failure had the potential for the wound to worsen and become infected. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) titled, Discharging the Resident, dated 9/1/24, indicated, the resident and/or responsible party would receive discharge instructions. A review of the undated document titled, Resident-Based Competencies (demonstrated skills that ensured an individual had the ability to provide adequate care), indicated, when a resident was discharged from the facility, the discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) was accurate for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when the discharge MDS did not reflect Resident 1's stage 4 (a deep wound that could expose muscle, tendon, or bone) coccyx (also known as the tailbone, located between the buttocks) wound at discharge. This caused an inaccurate reflection of Resident 1's health status and skin condition at discharge and had the potential to impact the discharge planning process. Findings: A review of the Long-Term Care facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual (RAI, a manual that provided clear guidance about how to complete the MDS), dated [DATE], indicated, when a resident was discharged from the facility, an assessment was required. The RAI indicated the intent of Section M: Skin Conditions, was to document the presence of wounds. A review of the admission Record, dated 6/1/25, indicated resident 1 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a bed-hold notice upon transfer to the hospital or within 24 hours following an emergency transfer, which affected 2 (Resident #7 and Resident #47) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Findings included: An undated facility document titled, Bed Hold Policy and Notification revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide any resident that is transferred to a general acute care hospital the right to exercise the bed hold provision. 1. Resident #7's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 05/20/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, and type two diabetes mellitus. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/11/2025, revealed Resident #7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #7's Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (Resident #38) of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration was assessed for their ability to self-administer medications. Specifically, Resident #38 expressed a desire to self-administer their medications, and without first assessing the resident to determine if they were clinically appropriate and safe to do so, the facility allowed the resident to self-administer a nebulizer treatment while unsupervised by staff and denied the resident the right to self-administer their inhaler. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, reviewed 10/2024, indicated, Residents have the right to self-administer medications when it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. The policy specified, 1. As part of their overall evaluation, resident's mental and physical abilities will be considered to determine whether self-administering medications is clinically appropriate for the resident. Resident #38's admission Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded for pressure ulcers and restraints for 1 (Resident #62) of 21 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Assessments, revised 10/2024, revealed, A comprehensive assessment of each resident is completed at intervals designated by OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] regulations and PPS [Perspective Payment Plan] requirements. The section of the policy titled, Policy Interpretation and Implementation included 6. The resident assessment coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the interdisciplinary team conducts timely and appropriate resident assessments. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, version 1.19.1, dated 10/2024, revealed, M0210: Unhealed Pressure Ulcers/Injuries, specified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three residents sampled for patient rights (Resident 1) was treated with dignity and respect when the Marketing Director (MD) had spoken with Resident 1 on the phone with the hospice nurse (HN) available and stated, What the hell are you doing. We would've never brought you back if we knew you weren't going on hospice. Nobody wants you here, This resulted in Resident 1 becoming tearful and had the potential to result in psychosocial harm. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled, Resident Rights, with a revised date of [DATE], indicated, Our facility will make every effort to assist each resident in exercising his/her rights to assure that the resident is always treated with respect, kindness, and dignity. A review of the facility's records indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included morbid obesity (a disorder that involves having too much body fat, which increases the risk of health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement resident-directed care consistent preferences and rights for one of three residents sampled for patient rights (Resident 1) when the facility did not maintain a valid copy of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a voluntary option for people to use to communicate their end-of-life decisions) in Resident 1's medical record when transfer from the facility via ambulance was made. This failure resulted in Resident 1's right to decline specific treatment in the event of a medical emergency to not be followed. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled Advance Directives, with a revised date of [DATE], indicated, The director of nursing services or designee notifies the attending physician of advance directives (or changes in advance directives) so that appropriate orders can be documented in the residents medical record and plan of care . The plan of care for each resident is consistent with his or her documented treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility did not meet this requirement when it failed to provide evidence of incontinent (no ability to control one's bowels or bladder and requires staff to clean), care for two of 17 sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2). This resulted in the potential for skin breakdown and a loss of dignity for both residents, who were dependent on staff for care. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for conditions that included rhabdomyolysis (a breakdown of muscle), spondylosis (abnormal wear of the spinal cartilage), history of stroke and difficulty walking. A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool that measures health and mental status in nursing home patients), dated 6/4/24 indicated that her ability to use the restroom, Toilet Hygiene, was rated at 2 or Substantial/Maximal Assist. During an interview and observation on 7/24/24 at 11:20 AM, Resident 1 ' s room smelled strongly of stale urine. Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 2) was treated with dignity and respect during direct patient care. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 2's psychosocial well-being and did cause Resident 2 to become angry. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy revised 2/2021, titled, Dignity, indicated each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of wellbeing, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. This policy also indicated residents are treated with respect and dignity at all times. During a review of the facility's policy revised 2/2021, titled, Resident Rights, indicated each resident is to be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity; and to be supported by the facility in exercising his or her rights. A review of Resident 2's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have or follow policies and procedures for Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QA/PI) nor any formalized QAPI projects as required. This failure demonstrated a lack of quality and performance improvement that could lead to a decrease in Resident quality of life, enjoyment and happiness, causing adverse clinical outcomes. Findings: On 11/16/23 at 10:30 AM during a concurrent interview and record review the Facility Administrator (Admin) was interviewed regarding facility administration functions. The Admin was not able to provide regulation required policies and procedures on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QA/PI). The QA/PI processes assist a facility in recognizing issues potentially affecting residents adversely, guiding the facility in monitoring and improving issues to reduce or prevent adverse outcomes. The Admin stated he did not have a policy for QA/PI processes available. The Admin did not have any documented formalized regulatory required QA/PI projects with planning, review,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have records of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QA/PI) meetings to obtain feedback, use data, and take action in conducting structured, systematic investigations and analysis of problems affecting facility-wide processes that impact quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety. The facility failing to have a structured, functional QA/PI process addressing potentially harmful and preventable issues creates the potential for resident harm and adverse clinical outcomes. Findings: During a concurrent record review and interview on 11/16/23 at 9:56 AM, with the Facility Administrator (Admin) when questioned about monthly and quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QA/PI) meetings the Admin stated the facility has, Daily quality meetings with department by department issues the managers select. The Admin was not able to print a report. Observed the form and it appears to be a day by day (not a formal monthly or quarterly) account of departmental quality assessments and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control program was properly maintained or implemented to reduce the spread of infection when: 1. Personal protective equipment (PPE, gloves, gowns, eye protection, and masks) was not consistently and correctly used by staff when providing care for Coronavirus disease (COVID-19: an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) positive residents; and 2. Tuberculosis (TB-a bacterial infection that mainly attacks the lung. A tuberculosis screening test checks to see if a person has the bacteria (germs) that cause TB in the body) screen was not done per the facility's policy for one out of six sampled employees. 3. Hospitality Aide (HA) did not perform hand hygiene (wash hands or use hand sanitizer) before or after direct resident contact with five out of five residents (Resident 41, 66, 52, 62, and 15) including contact with self. These failures had the potential to result in the development and transmission of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow its Administrating Medications policy and procedure (P&P) for one out of one resident (Resident 53) when Resident 53 was provided a suppository (a meltable medication placed into the rectum) for self-administration. This failure had the potential for incorrect medication administration and could cause Resident 53 negative clinical outcomes. Findings: During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Administrating Medications, revised 12/1/22, indicated, Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the Attending Physician, in conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. A review of the undated record titled admission Record indicated Resident 53 was admitted to the facility with the diagnosis of morbid (severe) obesity (more than 80 to 100 pounds over the ideal body weight) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that made it difficult to breath). The admission Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the facility in a safe and operable manner and provide a homelike environment when: 1. A handrail at the end of Hall 3 was not attached securely to the wall, sections of the ceiling had missing and peeling popcorn texture (a sprayed on bumpy texture that was applied to the ceiling) on Hall 3 and near the nurse station. 2. Five of 13 sampled residents (Residents 18, 75, 46, 55, and 27) expressed that their belongings were missing. This failure had the potential to cause resident harm and resulted in residents' inability to access their own belongings and had the potential to foster an environment that was not home-like. Findings: 1. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Maintenance Service, revised 10/1/09, indicated Maintenance service shall be provided to all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment. The P&P indicated maintenance personnel were responsible for Maintaining the building in good repair. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Homelike…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing that met the needs of the residents when: 1. Two out of 11 residents (Resident 45 and 50) stated they did not receive a shower due to the facility not having enough staff. 2. Eight out of 11 residents stated they experienced long call light wait time due to the facility not having enough staff. This failure had the potential to result in resident inability to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psycho-social well-being. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Staffing, revised 4/1/21, indicated, Our facility provides adequate staffing to meet needed care and services for our resident population. The P&P indicated, Our facility maintains adequate staffing on each shift to ensure that our resident's needs and services are met. 1. During a review if the facility's P&P titled Shower, revised 5/1/18, indicated, The purposes of this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not post daily staffing for public viewing as required by regulation. This failure created the potential for staffing issues including, short staffing, staffing and workload misinformation leading to decreased quality of care and adverse clinical outcomes. Findings: During a concurrent Interview and record review on 11/14/23 at 3:42 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) attempted to locate the daily staffing posting. When the document for 11/14/23 was not available and determined not to exist the DON stated, It is not here. I will check and see if I can find it and left the DON's office. The DON approached the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), asked if the ADON was familiar with the form and had a current copy. The ADON did not have knowledge of the form and did not have a copy. Neither the ADON nor DON had the regulation required documents for the last 18 months. At 3:50 PM on 11/14/23 during a concurrent interview and document review the Facility Administrator (Admin) was not familiar with the requirement for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the five rights of medication administration had been followed for one resident (Resident 53) when Licensed Nurse (LN) F did not know the name or dosage of a medication that LN F provided to Resident 53 and LN F did not document the medication had been given. This failure had the potential for incorrect medication administration, duplication for medication administration, and could cause Resident 53 negative clinical outcomes. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Administrating Medications, revised 12/1/22, indicated, The individual administering the medication must check the label to verify the right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. The P&P indicated the Individual administering the medication will record in the resident's medical record: the date, time, dose, and sign record. A review of the undated record titled admission Record indicated Resident 53 was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide routine showers and/or baths consistent with the residents' needs and choices for 11of 23 (Resident 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 16, 17, 20, 25, and 26) sampled residents. This failure had the potential to result in depression, poor self-esteem, skin breakdown, infection, and denial of resident rights, all of which could lead to negative clinical outcomes for all residents. Findings: Review of a facility policy titled Bath; Bed Bath, No-Rinse Sponge Bath (undated) indicated baths were to be given to residents to provide cleanliness, comfort, and to prevent body odors. The policy indicated, All residents are given baths unless contraindicated (not advised). The policy indicated bath water should be comfortably warm (between 95- and 110-degrees Fahrenheit) and should be changed intermittently throughout the process when the water becomes too cool or dirty. During review of record titled Resident Council Minutes, dated 7/20/2023 at 1:45 pm, shower was indicated as a concern regarding nursing care. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the supervision required to keep all residents free from potential accidents and hazards when: 1. One of seven residents (Resident 1) eloped unsupervised (left without notice) from the facility without staff being aware he was gone. 2. Wanderguard alarms (prevent wander-prone residents from leaving unattended) were not working at two of four facility exit doors. These failures had the potential to compromise the safety and well-being of all residents from unsupervised wandering/elopement with the potential for accident or harm. Findings: Review of facility policy titled, Safety and Supervision of Residents, revised 10/2022, indicated the facility would strive to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible based on individual resident need. The policy indicated the facility would monitor the effectiveness of interventions by (a) ensuring that interventions are implemented correctly and consistently, (b) evaluate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' linens were being clean and sanitized using infection control standards. This failure resulted in residents' linens not being cleaned and sanitized properly and had the potential to spread disease and infection throughout the facility. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control, revised 10/2021, indicated, An infection prevention and control program (ICPC) is established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. During observation on 10/13/2023 at 8:50 am, overheard Director of Nursing (DON) inform Resident 8 an issue with no hot water in the facility was fixed Wednesday (10/11/2023). Resident 8 stated the hot water had been out for like a week. DON again replied that maintenance staff had resolved the issue two days prior. During a review of Plumbing Doctor Invoice #24467745, dated 10/17/2023, the invoice indicated it was an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain essential equipment necessary to ensure resident safety and activities of daily living needs were met when: 1 The Wanderguard Alarm System (prevents wander-prone residents from leaving the facility unattended) did not work for three weeks or more. This failure led to the potential for unsupervised resident elopement (leaving without notice), leading to the potential for harm and preventable accidents/hazards for all residents. 2. One of two facility water heaters did not work for two weeks or more. This failure led to residents not getting baths or showers due to no hot water in the facility with the potential to result in poor self-esteem, depression, denial of resident rights, contribution to skin breakdown, infection, and negative clinical outcomes for all residents. Findings: 1. Review of a facility policy titled, Wandering and Elopements, revised 3/2019, indicated that the facility will identify residents who are at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent administrative oversight to ensure the residents received the care and services to meet their needs when: 1. Pain management and Hospice services were not coordinated and monitored to meet the needs of residents. Refer to F 697, F 726 and F 849. 2. Pharmacy services related to administration, labeling, and storage did not meet standards. Refer to F 755, F 759, F 880 3. Resident council complaints were unresolved. Refer to F 565 4. Ensure safe smoking practices in the facility. Refer to F 689 Findings: A review of the facility's job description, titled Administrator, revised on 3/1/2014, indicated: a. The Administrator (ADMIN) assumes full-time administrative authority, responsibility and accountability for the operations and for the financial viability of the nursing facility. Manages facility employees in the provision of care and services rendered in accordance with professional standards, and in compliance with county, state and federal laws and regulations, as applicable. Collaborates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide full visual privacy to one out of two sampled residents (Resident 67) when a privacy curtain had been missing for one month. This failure had the potential to cause a decline in Resident 67's mental health and cause psychosocial harm. Findings: A review of the records indicated Resident 67 was admitted to the facility 1/29/21 with the diagnoses of generalized anxiety disorder (extreme worrying that interferes with daily activities), cognitive communication impairment (inability to interact meaningfully with others), and bipolar disorder, current episode mixed, moderate (mood disorder that can cause rapid speech, racing thoughts, and agitation). Resident 67 was her own responsible party and could make her own medical decisions. During a concurrent interview and observation on 8/9/22, at 9:24 am, Resident 67 was sitting in a wheelchair in the hallway, had rapid speech, an elevated tone (variations in speech), and was waving arms in the air. Resident 67 stated being upset because the privacy curtain in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-18 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address and resolve Resident Council identified issues and concerns for the past four months This failure resulted in pain management needs not to be met, call lights remained being unanswered for an extended amount of time, nutritional needs not to be met and residents felt their grievances were not listened to. Findings: The facility used a form titled Resident Council Minutes that kept attendance of the participants in resident council and tracked their grievances. This form also discussed old business, and new business, including resolutions the facility department related to any issues were responsible for addressing the concerns. Review of Resident Council Minutes, dated 06/23/2022, had a section titled Old Business - Any new business identified at the last council meeting must be addressed here - either as resolved or unresolved. Five out of six items in this list are marked as resolved, with one unresolved. The unresolved items are as follows - Food comes out cold sometimes. However, PM janitor could use more…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two of eighteen smoking residents (Resident 74 and 49) smoked safely in the designated supervised area, securing smoking supplies, and use of safety equipment. This resulted in unsupervised smoking, hazards including cigarettes not properly being disposed of, lack of safety equipment, and had a potential to put all residents at risk for fire hazard and injuries. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policy titled, Smoking Policy - Residents, revised in April 2012, it is listed under Policy Interpretation and Implementation, that smoking is only permitted in designated resident smoking areas, which are located outside of the building. It also states that all residents will have a smoking agreement signed upon admission and quarterly - which includes a statement saying that residents who had smoking privileges may not have or keep any smoking articles, including cigarettes, tobacco, etc., except when they are under direct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders when the pain management needs for one of four sampled Hospice (supportive care to terminally ill residents that focuses on their comfort, quality of life, and being pain free) residents when; Resident 281 received a lower than the ordered dose of morphine (a strong pain medication) on 12 of 20 occasions. This failure had the potential for Resident 281 to have uncontrolled moderate or severe pain. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 281's admission record, indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included prostate (a small gland in men) cancer, brain cancer, spine cancer and palliative care (specialized medical care for people living with a serious illness, such as cancer or heart failure). Resident 281 expired on [DATE]. A review of Resident 281's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident assessment), dated [DATE], indicated Resident 281's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 9. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/8/22 at 11:30 am, Resident 74 stated pain medications are late and looked in his journal and gave examples. On 8/1/22 at 9:30 am, CNA showed up at 10 am, then another correct CNA comes at 10:19 am, then he called another CNA at 10:40 am then by 11:50 am, he received his pain medication. On 8/5/22, Resident 74 called CNA at 10:40 am due to reporting pain level was a 7/10 (severe) and by 11:50 am he received his pain medication. Resident 74 stated his pain level right now was a 7/10. Resident 74 stated it makes him feel not happy, frustrated and causes anxiety. Resident 74 stated his pain level after receiving medication is usually a level of 4-5 and was tolerable at that level. Resident 74 stated I'm not the waiting type and stand in the hallway. Resident 74 stated The Hospice nurse was aware. Resident 74 stated Timeliness could be improved; they should hire more people. 10. During an interview on 8/9/22 2:53 pm, CNA Y stated she works with Resident 57 often…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. A review of Resident 74's record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included heart failure, lung disease, and palliative hospice (end of life) care. Resident 74 was able to make his own health care decisions. A review of physician order dated 4/13/22, Morphine Sulfate Continuous release (MS Contin- a strong, long-acting narcotic pain medication) 15 milligrams (mg) every 12 hours for chronic pain. Morphine concentrate (liquid) 100 mg/5 milliliter (ml), administer 0.25 ml every 2 hours for mild pain (1-3 on pain scale), 0.5 ml orally every 2 hours for moderate pain (pain scale 4-6) and 1 ml every 2 hours for severe pain (pain scale number 7-10). A review of the MAR History dated 4/1-4/30/22, indicated Morphine Concentrate 0.5 ml for moderate pain levels 4-6 was administered 16 opportunities when Resident 74 reported severe pain levels at 7-8 out of ten. On 4/19/22 late administration was documented for the as needed dose. On 4/28/22 at 1:06 am, the post pain assessment for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure: 1. Accurate accountability and disposition of the medications awaiting final disposition (means destroying the unused medications to render it ineffective and prevent abuse or diversion) in the facility with a census of 76, 2. The facility's Consultant Pharmacist (CP) documented medication refrigerator temperatures were checked and logged for three out of three months (April, May, and June) when the facility temperature logs had missing data. 3. Routine medications (medications given daily) were not available for use for three out of four residents. These failed practices could contribute to unsafe medication use and prevention of drug diversion in the facility which could lead to negative outcomes. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview, observation and review on 8/9/22, 2:30 pm, of the facility's medication destruction binder, accompanied by the Director of Nurses (DON), narcotic sheets (documentation with name of narcotic, resident name, instructions for use, and the total number of individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility had a 17.24 % (percent) medication error rate, when five medication errors out of 29 opportunities were observed during medication pass for two out of three residents (Resident 16 and Resident 19). These failures resulted in four medications not given and one medication administered at an incorrect dose, which did not follow physician orders. This had the potential for residents to have a decrease of therapeutic medication effects (symptoms the medication is treating), a decline in health status, and negative psychosocial outcomes. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/10/22, at 8:14 am, Licensed Nurse (LN) F was orientating LN H on medication cart #3 (a locked cart on wheels, resident medications were stored in). LN H was not able to locate the blister pack (medication storage device) for Keppra (seizure medication). LN H stated, this is not the first time we were out of Keppra. LN H stated, if a surveyor was not watching the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide safe storage and labeling of medications and medical supplies when: 1a. the refrigerator and room temperatures were not consistently monitored in one out of one medication storage rooms. 1b. an unlabeled medication with wet, deteriorated packaging located in medication refrigerator was available for use. 2a. expired medication stored in one out of four medication carts (a locked cabinet on wheels where resident medication is stored). 2b. one out of four medication carts where medication was stored contained loose debris and was dirty. 2c. Expired and unlabeled medication were stored in one out of one treatment cart. These failures had the potential for unsafe medication use, and the use of medical supplies which would no longer be effective, which could lead to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: 1a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/9/22, at 10:29 am, Director of Nurses (DON) and Licensed Nurse H (LN) confirmed medication refrigerator temperature logs were missing temperature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure the food service met resident needs as evidenced by unresolved food complaints surrounding the form, taste and temperature of the food that was served. These failures had the potential to result in decreased resident meal intakes, negatively impact their nutritional health status and quality of life. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 44's record indicated diagnoses that include transient cerebral ischemic attack (a stroke - damage to the brain from interruption in its blood supply), difficulty walking, respiratory failure with hypoxia. Resident 44 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score (a number value between 00-15 with 13-15 cognitively intact, 08-12 moderately impaired, and 00-07 severe impairment) score of 15 on 6/9/22 and Part G of the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (provides a comprehensive assessment of the resident's functional capabilities. Section G is specific to Functional Status) on 6/20/22 indicated Resident 44 needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident preferences were honored and offered substitutes of similar nutritive value for 10 of 10 sampled residents (Residents 21, 33, 39, 44, 49, 50, 56, 66, 67, and 76) and four out of eight confidential resident interviews. This failure not to provide food in accordance with resident preferences may result in decreased meal satisfaction and overall caloric intake. Findings: 1. Resident 39's record was reviewed. Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included, Parkinson's disease (uncontrollable tremors, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), and history of falling. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident assessment) dated 6/9/22, indicated that Resident 39 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 8/8/22, at 11:10 a.m., with Resident 39, Resident 39 stated, The food here is terrible and cold most of the time. They serve the same bland stuff every day, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-18 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement Hospice agreements and Hospice program ((a program designed to provide a caring environment for meeting the physical and emotional needs of the terminally ill) policy and procedures, and collaborate in the development of a coordinated plan of care, to ensure the physical, psychosocial, spiritual, and emotional needs were meet for four of four sample residents (Resident 57, 58, 74 and 281) when: 1.a. Resident 281 was given wrong dosage, wrong pain medication for the wrong pain level. This resulted in agitation and four falls. 1.b. Resident 281 wasn't provided with Oxygen concentrator on 4/15/22, 4/22/22 and 4/23/22 per physician ordered and hospice plan of care. This could potentially cause respiratory distress for Resident 281. 2. Resident 58 wasn't given his pain medication per physician order when he asked for it. Resident 58 was upset and had to suffer a longer pain. 3. Resident 74 was given incorrect dose of medication for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-18 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services met accepted standards of quality when the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) did not identify and correct quality deficiencies when: 1. Pain management and Hospice services were not coordinated and monitored to meet the needs of residents. Refer to F 697, F 726 and F 849. 2. Pharmacy services related to administration, labeling, and storage did not meet standards. Refer to F 755, F 759, F 880 3. Resident council complaints were unresolved. Refer to F 565 4. Ensure safe smoking practices in the facility. Refer to F 689 This failure resulted in substandard quality of care and had the potential to put all residents at risk for safety and decreased quality of care and life. Findings: A Review of the facility's policy, titled 2022 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, updated on 7/28/2022, showed: - Guiding: a. The organization uses quality assurance and performance improvement to make decisions and guide their day-to-day operations. b. The outcome of QAPI in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee failed to develop and implement plans of action to correct identified facility issues related to: 1. Pain management and Hospice services were not coordinated and monitored to meet the needs of residents. Refer to F 697, F 726 and F 849. 2. Pharmacy services related to administration, labeling, and storage did not meet standards. Refer to F 755, F 759, F 880 3. Resident council complaints were unresolved. Refer to F 565 4. Ensure safe smoking practices in the facility. Refer to F 689 Findings: A Review of the facility's policy, titled 2022 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, updated on 7/28/2022, showed: a. QAPI Plan: The QAPI plan guides the facility's performance improvement efforts. b. The QAPI team will review the sources of information to determine if gaps or patterns exist in the systems of care that could result in quality problems; or if there are opportunities to make improvements. The facility's governing body is ultimately responsible for overseeing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe infection control practices to prevent spread of infection when: 1. The blood pressure (BP) cuff was not effectively sanitized in-between resident care use on two out of two sampled residents (Resident 16 and Resident 19). 2. Licensed Nurse H (LN) touched medications with bare hands on two out of two sampled residents (Resident 16 and Resident 19). 3. a. Oxygen tubing was found on floor, outdated, and or undated for one out of two residents (Resident 43). b. Oxygen tubing was undated for one out two residents (Resident 38). c. Oxygen tubing was unlabeled for one out of one resident (Resident 77) while using a portable oxygen tank. 4. Staff failed to wear the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, face shield or goggles, gloves, gown) in the facility's yellow zone (area used to quarantine new admissions who require isolation) These failed practices may pose health and infection risk to facility's residents potentially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 2.9 | +2.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| VEMULAPALLI, SHAILAJA | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 08/09/2022 |
| COMER, CAMERON | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 04/23/2023 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555682. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.