Moraga Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 237 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 79.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 97 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.68 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 46.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to prevent falls and sustained injuries when Resident 1, with history of unwitnessed falls, lost her balance while walking from her bed to room's doorway and fell forward to the ground. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a laceration to the left frontal part of the head with uncontrolled bleeding, transferred to Acute Care Hospital for follow up care and diagnosed with subarachnoid hemorrhage (a life-threatening condition caused by bleeding into the space surrounding the brain).During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), printed on 2/23/26, AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included abnormalities of gait (a person's manner of walking) and mobility, age related physical debility, osteoarthritis, wedge compression fracture of first lumber vertebra (fractured back) and vascular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it kept accurate records of controlled medications (medication with a potential for abuse) as evidenced by: 1. The facility failed to ensure, for residents (1-9), the scheduled (controlled medication, narcotic) medication system was complete (all documents available) and accurate (information matched). The record system included Shipping Manifests (pharmacy delivery receipt), Controlled Substance Accountability Sheets (CDR, Controlled Drug Record), Medication Administration Records (MAR, record of medication administration), and destruction logs. The facility records were incomplete. The facility records were inaccurate. These failures had the potential to result in undetected loss and diversion of scheduled medications. In addition, these failures had the potential to result in preventable medication errors (medication not given as ordered). 2. The facility failed to ensure, between 4/1/22-7/31/22, the Consultant Pharmacist identified the scheduled (controlled medication, narcotic) medication system…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0836 — isolated
  Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the social services department was directed and supervised by a qualified social worker according to State regulation for more than 9 years.This failure resulted in all residents receiving social services care from unqualified staff.During an interview on 3/24/26 at 9:45 a.m. with the Social Services Director (SSD), the SSD stated they were the only staff member in the facility's social services department and had worked there for more than 9 years as the social services director. The SSD stated they did not have a bachelor's degree in any field and that their training for the position consisted of a certificate course they completed in 1997. The SSD further stated they had not received any continuing education or additional training since obtaining the certificate in 1997.During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/24/26 at 10:00 a.m. with the Operations Manager (OM), two job descriptions for the SSD, dated 7/2022 and 12/2025, were reviewed. Both job descriptions were signed by the SSD. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from unnecessary drugs when:1. Interdisciplinary team (IDT-a group of professionals from different disciplines working together to provide the greatest benefit to the resident, which included the resident, the resident's family and/or representative, whenever possible, develops and implements approaches to care that are both clinically appropriate and person - centered.) did not address Resident 1's angry outbursts and hallucinations (perceptual experiences in the absence of real external sensory stimuli) and identify person-centered non-pharmacological/behavior approaches prior to administering Resident 1 Quetiapine Fumarate (Seroquel), an antipsychotic medication for vascular dementia (a general term to describe a group of symptoms related to loss of memory, judgment, language, complex motor skills, and other intellectual function, caused by the permanent damage or death of the brain's nerve cells, or neurons. There are many types and causes of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and comprehensive assessment, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), with occasional incontinence of bladder and bowel, received appropriate care services and assistance to maintain and restore continence to the extent possible. This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for infections, falls and injuries. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), printed on 5/6/26, AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included history of falling, muscle wasting and atrophy, age related osteoporosis, and dementia with mood disturbances (memory loss). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan), dated 3/3/26, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had occasional incontinence of bladder and bowel. MDS indicated trial toileting program (e.g., scheduled toileting,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0836 — isolated
  Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow state regulation in ensuring residents were housed in approved areas when the facility allowed one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) to be housed in a conference room without a sink from admission to discharge totaling six weeks.This failure placed Resident 2 at risk for infection when the facility was unable to provide a sink for handwashing and could only provide a commode for toileting.A review of Resident 2's admission record indicated Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of neutropenia (blood disorder which white blood cells count is reduced), hemiplegia (the loss of muscle function on one side of the body), hemiparesis (a relatively mild loss of strength in the arm, leg, and sometimes face on one side of the body), functional diarrhea and heart failure. The record further indicated Resident 2 discharged on 2/11/26.During a record review of Resident 1's minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool to guide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safe labeling, open date, and expiration date of eye drop medication for 2 (Resident 98 and Resident 100) out of 2 residents. These failures had the potential to result in residents being given medication with decreased potency and efficacy. Findings: During an observation of Medication Cart A on 11/4/24, at 11:45 a.m., with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Resident 98's Latanoprost (medication to treat high pressure in the eye caused by glaucoma) Ophthalmic solution label indicated an expiration date of June 2026, to refrigerate until opening and to discard 42 days after opening. No open date was indicated on the label. During an observation of Medication Cart B on 11/4/24, at 12:00 p.m., with ADON, Resident 100's Latanoprost Ophthalmic solution label indicated an expiration date of June 2026, to refrigerate until opening and to discard 42 days after opening. No open date was indicated on the label. During interview on 11/4/24, at 12:05 p.m., with ADON, ADON stated the eye drops should have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medication when the following was noted: 1. Two bottles of expired 20 milliliters (ml) of lorazepam (a medication used to treat anxiety) for Resident 10 were stored in a dedicated refrigerator for ready to use medications. 2. The lid of black colored Medication Disposal Bin was kept very loosely open in medication storage room. The failure to dispose of expired lorazepam medication, posed a potential risk of utilizing the medication with decreased effectiveness for anxiety to Resident 10. The failure to ensure proper security of the Medication Disposal bin posed a potential authorized/unauthorized access to medications in the bin. Findings: 1. During an observation on [DATE] at 09:57 a.m. in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER], with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, two bottles of 20 ml of lorazepam with expiration date of [DATE] for Resident 10 were kept in a dedicated refrigerator for ready to use medications. LVN 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure when it did not hire a full-time registered dietitian, the person designated to serve as the director of food and nutrition services met the federal and state educational qualifications for a dietary manager position. The lack of full-time, qualified oversight of food and nutrition staff placed residents who received food from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins) and/or decreased nutrient intake which had the potential to result in malnutrition and/or death. Findings: During an interview on 10/30/23 9:35 a.m., with Dietary Supervisor (DS), DS stated he worked fulltime as the Dietary Supervisor. DS stated he had worked at the facility for one year. During an interview on 10/31/23 at 12:23 p.m., with Registered Dietitian (RD), RD stated he worked at the facility part time. RD stated he was usually at the facility two days a week. During an interview on 11/01/23 at 9:18 a.m., with DS, DS stated he had completed an online training…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure storage and preparation of food under sanitary conditions when: 1. The facility failed to ensure two of two facility ovens were maintained in safe operating condition to provide cooked meals according to mealtime schedules: oven 1 was unable to cook chicken to the required food safety temperature; oven 2 was inoperable. 2. The facility failed to maintain the physical environment: the countertop toaster oven had brownish black debris both on the oven knobs and inside the oven; the kitchen floors had cracked tiles with blackish discoloration; a ceiling vent was covered with blackish, dusty material; the grease trap area was malodorous and not securely covered; a storage cabinet drawer did not fully close. These failures had the potential to result in food borne illnesses for residents who received food from the facility's kitchen. Findings: 1. During an observation on 10/30/23 at 1:15 p.m., with Dietary Supervisor (DS), in the kitchen, oven 2 had plates stored inside the oven. During a concurrent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist provided consultation services to ensure there was a record system for receipt and disposition and reconciliation of all controlled drugs maintained for three years. The failure to maintain records had the potential to result in drug diversion. Findings: During and concurrent interview and record review on 11/1/2,3 at 11:06 a.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), the controlled medication disposition binder was reviewed. The DON stated she had a huge stack of unorganized logs and medications packages for controlled medications which had been sent for disposal on 10/5/23. DON stated she had organized the logs and placed them in the disposition binder; the binder showed the last previous transfer for destruction date was 10/5/22, with no transfer for final disposal of controlled medication between 10/5/2022 to 10/5/2023. The DON stated she and the facility's Pharmacist (Pharm) were responsible to dispose of the controlled medications into the final incinerator container together. The DON stated Pharm had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-10 for 41 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $585K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA