No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rancho Bellagio Post Acute

26940 E Hospital Road, Moreno Valley, CA 92555 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (951) 363-5434 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (951) 363-5434 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 20221 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$8,827 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2022
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,827 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-12)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
14425 Moreno Beach Dr · (951) 242-7471 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
29010 Alessandro Blvd · (951) 924-0840 · Call to confirm hours
Park
28506 John F Kennedy Dr · (951) 413-3000 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
28354 Alessandro Blvd

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.9%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.5%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.5%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%9.8%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.4%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.1%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.1%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.1%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.3%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.5%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.012.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.871.571.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 372 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
75.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.84U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.38hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.40hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 75.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 118 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.84 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.6%CMS range 43.6–57.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 8.6–13.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge75.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge76.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge68.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge87.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 3.7–8.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.691.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
1.55
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.34
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.32
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
33.3%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 91.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.48 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-29)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to one of six sampled residents (Resident 1), who was diagnosed with dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning) and had history of elopement (incident when a resident leaves the facility without authorization). In addition, the facility failed to frequently monitor the whereabouts of Resident 1 in accordance with the care plan. Resident 1 exited the facility on December 20, 2024, via the BC wing (name of a facility wing) automatic sliding door. It was observed that the sliding door led directly to the facility's parking lot, which led to a two-way street. This failure exposed the resident to immediate danger, accidents, serious harm, or death. Resident 1 returned to the facility on January 7, 2025 (18 days after the resident eloped). On January 24, 2025, at 12:23 p.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-22 · tag F0555 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was informed and allowed to exercise the right to choose and attending physician for four of four residents reviewed for physician choice (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4). This failure resulted in Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4 not being afforded the opportunity to retain a personal physician or select an attending physician of their choice upon admission. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis which included chronic osteomyelitis, left thigh (long term bone infection in the left upper leg) and osteonecrosis, left femur (part of the large bone in the left upper leg had died because it does not get enough blood). Resident 1's History and Physical, dated [DATE], indicated, .Alert, oriented, x3. On [DATE], at 10:20 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 1 inside her room. Resident 1 stated that upon admission she was assigned to a facility physician and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were provided to meet the needs of the residents when the facility did not meet the required minimum of actual total Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) Direct Care Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD - measure the numbers of hours of direct care given to residents in skilled nursing facility) of 2.4 hours for the months of October 2025, November 2025, December 2025, and January 2026.The failure to maintain the required minimum CNA DHPPD hours had the potential to place residents at risk for unmet needs, compromised safety, and decreased quality of care. Findings:On January 28, 2026, at 1:40 p.m., the facility staffing records were reviewed. The review indicated the facility's CNA staffing levels were below the minimum required DHPPD of 2.4 hours on the following dates:-October 1, 2025, through October 31, 2025-November 1, 2025, through November 30, 2025-December 1, 2025, through December 20, 2025-December 22, 2025, through December 30, 2025-January 1, 2026, through January 19, 2026-January 21, 2026-January…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the physician for a change in condition, for two of eight residents reviewed for changes in condition (Resident 8 and 110) when: 1. For Resident 8, licensed nurses did not notify the physician of multiple refusals of prescribed insulin [chemical in the body that helps move sugar from the blood into the body's cells]. 2. For Resident 110, licensed nurses did not notify the physician of the repeated episodes of blood pressure readings less than 100/60 mm Hg (millimeters per mercury - unit of measurement). These failures placed the residents at increased risk to their health and well-being due to the lack of physician oversight necessary to evaluate and address changes in their medical conditions. Findings: 1.On January 25, 2026, at 12:06 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 8 in his room. Resident 8 stated he had insulin ordered but had been refusing it because he believed he did not need it. On January 26, 2026, Resident 8's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address a resident's repeated refusal of prescribed insulin (a chemical in the body which helps more sugar from the blood into the body's cells) for one of ten residents for care planning (Resident 8). This failure placed Resident 8 at risk for uncontrolled blood glucose levels and potential diabetic complications.Findings:On January 25, 2026, at 12:06 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 8 in his room. Resident 8 stated that he had insulin ordered but refuses to take it because he believed he did not need it. On January 26, 2026, Resident 8's admission record was reviewed. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar) with diabetic Neuropathy (nerve damage caused by high blood sugar). A review of Resident 8's record, titled, Order Summary Report, dated January 28, 2026, indicated, .Humalog Solution 100 unit/ml (unit of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident 22) reviewed received the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. For Resident 22, nursing staff did not follow the physician's insulin (medication to treat diabetes) sliding scale order (a chart with insulin doses to maintain blood sugar levels) to notify the physician when the blood sugar (BS) result was above 350. This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 22's health and well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 22's admission Record, dated January 28, 2026, indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes. A review of Resident 22's Care Plan Report, dated May 8, 2025, indicated, Focus.Diabetes.Interventions.Administer medication as ordered.Blood glucose (sugar) checks as ordered. Report to physician if blood glucose is outside of set parameters. A review of Resident 22's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that upon written request, medical records were released within two working days, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 5). This failure had the potential to impact continuity of care, appeals, or legal matters. Findings: On November 20, 2025, at 11:30 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for the investigation of a complaint. On November 20, 2025, Resident 5's record was reviewed. Resident 5 was admitted on [DATE], and discharged [DATE], with diagnoses that included aftercare following surgical amputation (a medically approved removal of a part of the body). A review of the facility document titled, Released Records Log indicated that on May 14, 2025, the following records were to be released for Resident 5, .5/14 nursing notes.not picked up. There were no additional notations made on this log related to the records request for Resident 5's medical records being provided to or picked up by a representative party of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0555 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident right to choose attending physician for two of eight sampled residents (Residents 1 and 6) in a universe of 91 residents.This failure had the potential to harm the resident's autonomy, continuity of care, which could potentially lead to unmet needs for residents in the facility. Findings:On December 3, 2025, at 1:07 p.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was initiated to investigate a resident's right issue. 1) A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report indicated resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of immunodeficiency (failure of the immune system to protect the body from infection), anemia (blood has a lower-than-normal amount of red blood cells), type 2 diabetes (a chronic condition that affects the way the body uses sugar. The body either resists the effects of insulin - a hormone that regulates the movement of sugar into the cells - or doesn't produce enough insulin to maintain normal sugar levels), primary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0777 — isolated
    Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure STAT, (done without delay) chest radiology and laboratory orders were done as ordered by the physician for one of eight residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident 1), in a universe of 91 residents. This failure had the potential to result in delayed diagnosis and treatment. Findings:On December 3, 2025, at 1:07 p.m., an unannounced visit to the facility on two complaints and a Facility Reported Incident were initiated.A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report indicated resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of immunodeficiency, (failure of the immune system to protect the body from infection), anemia, (blood has a lower-than-normal amount of red blood cells), type 2 diabetes, (a chronic condition that affects the way the body uses sugar. The body either resists the effects of insulin - a hormone that regulates the movement of sugar into the cells - or doesn't produce enough insulin to maintain normal sugar levels), primary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident 's call light was within reach, for one of three sampled residents out (Resident 1). This failure could have resulted in Resident 1 not receiving nursing assistance when needed. Findings: On April 14, 2025, at 750 a.m., an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, who stated, the residents use their call lights to request help from nursing staff. CNA 1 stated, the call light should always be within reach of the resident. On April 16, at 1105 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview of Resident 1 were conducted. Resident 1 was heard calling out from the room for staff assistance. Resident 1 was then observed in his room sitting in a reclining chair, with his legs and feet up, the chair was horizontal to the foot of his bed. Resident 1 ' s call light was at the head of the bed, out of reach from resident. Resident 1 stated, I ' ve been here too long, I want to go to bed. On April 16, 2025, at 11:18 a.m., a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation for one of six residents reviewed, (Resident 1), as the resident's record indicated Resident 1 was last seen at 3:45 p.m. on December 20, 2024, while the video surveillance showed Resident 1 left the facility at 3:08 p.m. on December 20, 2024. This failure resulted in an inaccurate account of Resident 1's whereabouts and potentially impacting the accuracy of their care documentation. Findings: On January 23, 2025, at 10:45 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility on a facility reported incident was initiated. A review of Resident 1's medical records indicated she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia, (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), paranoid schizophrenia, (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), psychoactive substance abuse. (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper disposal of garbage when three dumpsters were overflowing, the lids could not be closed, and the surrounding area was littered with debris. This failure had the potential to attract pests and cause infection control issues. Findings: On December 8, 2024, at 8:15 a.m., during an observation of the dumpster storage area outside of the facility near the corner entrance, three out of three dumpsters were overflowing with garbage and cardboard boxes. The dumpster lids were not closed, and debris was scattered around the dumpsters. On December 8, 2024, at 10:17 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Supervisor (DSS), in front of the dumpsters, the DSS stated the dumpsters should be closed and not overflowing with garbage or boxes. The DSS further stated there should not be any debris surroundnig the dumpster area to prevent pest infestations, which could lead to infection control issues. On December 8, 2024, at 10:22 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Advance Directive (AD-a written instruction related to the provision of health care when the resident is no longer able to make decisions) education, materials, and follow-up for three of five residents reviewed for AD (Residents 19, 35, and 69) and/or their resident representatives (RP). This failure had the potential for Residents 19, 35, and 69's medical preferences not being honored during critical healthcare decisions. Findings: 1. Resident 35's record was reviewed. Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (lack of oxygen to the brain). A review of Resident 35's history and physical dated November 4, 2024, indicated Resident 35 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. Resident 35 is self-responsible. A review of Resident 35's, Advance Directive Acknowledgement, dated November 3, 2024, indicated, Resident 35 was not screened or provided AD education. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the lunch menu on December 9, 2024, met residents' needs when: 1. Dietary Aide (DA 1) served pudding instead of mandarin oranges for five of five residents (Residents 19, 41, 134, 190 and 332) on a renal diet (a restricted diet that can help slow kidney damage). 2. [NAME] (CK 1) served pureed spinach instead of green beans for one of one resident (Resident 332) on a renal pureed diet (smooth, lump-free foods that require no chewing). 3. DA 1 used a #8 scoop size to serve dessert for regular diets. 4. CK 1 did not follow the recipe when preparing garlic parmesan spinach. These failures had the potential for residents to miss out on therapeutic and nutritional benefits, correct serving portion, and/or palatability (acceptable taste). Findings: 1. A review of the facility's Winter menu for Week 2, dated December 9, 2024, indicated: -Southern beef patties with cream gravy, Mashed Potatoes (renal diet: wheat pasta) Garlic Parmesan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy on Meal Service to provide appetizing food at appropriate temperatures and appetizing taste according to residents' preferences for 14 of 96 sampled residents (Residents 14, 15, 19, 29, 36, 41, 43, 51, 65, 69, 73, 77, 182, and 282). This failure placed residents at potential risk to decrease nutritional intake and affect the resident's nutrition status. Findings: On December 8, 2024, at 8:47 a.m., during an interview with Resident 73, she stated, the served food does not taste very good, not good quality. On December 8, 2024, at 9:30 a.m., during an interview with Resident 282, he stated, food tasted bad and is cold for breakfast, lunch and dinner every day. On December 8, 2024, at 9:55 a.m., during an interview with Resident 182, he stated, food tasted bland. On December 8, 2024, at 9:55 a.m., during an interview with Resident 14, she stated, the served food taste bad. On December 8, 2024, at 10:12 a.m., during an interview with Resident 41, she stated, the served food not appetizing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. Food and Nutrition Service employees did not follow the facility cleaning procedure to clean food preparation surfaces and stationary equipment. 2. Four out of four green storage shelves in the walk-in refrigerator had buildup; 3. Dust was hanging on walk-in refrigerator's fan covers; and 4. One wet plastic container was stacked with other dried plastic containers. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food) in a medically vulnerable population of 95 out of 95 residents who received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. During a review of the facility provided procedure title, SHELVES, COUNTERS, AND OTHER SURFACES INCLUDING SINKS (HANDWASHING, FOOD PREPARATION, ETC.), the procedure indicated, CLEANING PROCEDURE: 1. Remove any large debris and wash surface with a warm detergent solution . 2. Rinse with clear water using a clean sponge or cloth. Wipe dry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication Nexium (esomeprazole-is used to treat conditions where there is too much acid in the stomach) was administered according to the physician's order for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 56). This failure had the potential to result in the worsening of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD-overaccumulation of stomach acid) for Resident 56. Findings: On December 11, 2024, at 2:48 p.m., during an interview with Resident 56, she stated she had been experiencing a little bit of nausea. Resident 56 stated she takes Nexium before breakfast for GERD but further stated she had not taken her Nexium medication for two days. A review of Resident 56's admission Record, indicated Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included gastroparesis (a condition in which the muscles in the stomach does not move food for digestion) and GERD. A review of Resident 56's Physician's Order, dated October 10, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to replace the oxygen humidifier bottle in accordance with the facility policy and procedure for one of one resident reviewed for respiratory (Resident 66). This failure had the potential to result in ineffective oxygen therapy, respiratory distress, cross-contamination, and infection, which would lead to a decline in Resident 66's health condition. Findings: On December 9, 2024, at 10:27 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview were conducted in Resident 66's room with LVN 3. Resident 66 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannuala (NC-plastic tube that allows oxygen to be delivered to the nose from a machine). The nasal cannula was observed to be labeled with a date of 12/7. A humidifier bottle (plastic cannister filled with water to humidify air flow) was less than half filled and labeled with the date 11/24. LVN 3 stated, the nasal cannula and humidifier bottle should be changed every seven days. LVN 3 stated the cannula and humidifier…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rates were not five percent or greater when: 1. Resident 21's lidocaine (local anesthetic to relieve pain) patch was applied to the wrong body location; and 2. Resident 137's Metformin (medication to treat high blood sugar) and Carvedilol (heart medicine) were administered without food. These failures had the potential for Residents 21 and 137 to not adequately received the therapeutic effect of the medications. Findings: 1. On December 10, 2024, at 8:39 a.m., during medication administration observation inside Resident 21's room with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, LVN 3 applied Lidocaine Patch 5% (percent - unit of measurement) on Resident 21's back near the right shoulder blade. A review of Resident 21's Physician's Orders, dated August 18, 2024. indicated, .Lidocaine Patch 5% apply to each knee topically one time a day for pain management . On December 10, 2024, at 12:27 p.m., during a concurrent interview and review of Resident 21's Physician's Orders, with LVN 3, he stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement proper infection control measures when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 did not perform hand hygiene and wear personal protective equipment (PPE - equipment use to protect against infection or illness) upon entering the room and while providing care to Resident 283, who was positive for Clostridium Difficile infection (C. diff - a bacteria that cause diarrhea and is spread through contact with contaminated surfaces or people). This failures had the potential to increase the spread of pathogens (germs) and infections from staff to residents, potentially leading to illness. Findings: On December 10, 2024, at 8:25 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview in the hallway outside Resident 283's room, a contact precaution (a set of precautions to prevent the spread of germs that are transmitted through direct or indirect contact) sign was observed on the wall. CNA 1 entered and exited the room, provided care to Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the dish machine's temperature within the manurfacturer's guidelines. Failure to ensure adequate water temperature in the dish machine may result in ineffective cleaning of dishes, putting 95 residents at risk for food-borne illness (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food). Findings: According to the United States FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Food Code 2022, Section 4-204.115 Warewashing Machines, Temperature Measuring Devices, the Food Code indicated, The requirement for the presence of a temperature measuring device in each tank of the warewashing machine is based on the importance of temperature in the sanitization step. In hot water machines, it is critical that minimum temperatures be met at the various cycles so that the cumulative effect of successively rising temperatures causes the surface of the item being washed to reach the required temperature for sanitization. When chemical sanitizers are used, specific minimum temperatures must be met because the effectiveness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven residents' (Resident 7) call light was answered timely. This failure had the potential to not meet the resident's needs. Findings: On October 31, 2024, at 8:44 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to the facility for a quality of care issue. On October 31, 2024, at 12:02 p.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2, CNA 2 was observed to not answer Resident 7's call light after walking past the resident's room twice. CNA 2 stated he had just finished taking his morning break and did not have any residents to assist at the time. CNA 2 stated he saw the call light on and thought the nurse assigned to that room would answer it. CNA 2 stated he should have answered the call right away, even if the room was not on his assignment list. CNA 2 further stated he should have checked on the resident and communicated the resident's needs to the other CNA or licensed nurse. CNA 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the correct size bed rails were installed on one resident's bed as indicated on the resident's bed rails admission assessment, for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 2). This failure had the potential to result in negative outcomes including accident, physical restraint, decline in mobility and function, and psychosocial outcome. Findings: On October 31, 2024, at 12:02 p.m., a concurrent observation and interview were conducted with Resident 2. Resident 2 stated her bed was comfortable, but she did not like her side rails. Resident 2 stated she initially had short side rails but after she returned from the hospital, they changed her bed to one with longer side rails. She further stated that she felt closed in and she could not transfer easily to her wheelchair. A review of Resident 2's medical records indicated she was originally admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of left knee and hip effusion (when fluids collect around a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) did not perform handwashing after leaving the room of a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection prevention and control practices that can help reduce the spread of infection). This failure had the potential to increase the spread of pathogens (germs) from staff to residents which could lead to infections and illness. Findings: On October 31, 2024, at 9:29 a.m., a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was observed providing care to a resident on EBP. CNA 1 removed her gown and gloves and did not perform hand hygiene after exiting the resident's room. CNA 1 was observed grabbing a meal tray cart from outside and pushing the cart down the hallway. On October 31, 2024, at 9:31 a.m., CNA 1 was interviewed. CNA 1 stated she had forgotten to wash her hands and that she should have used the gel sanitizer outside in the hallway after leaving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) ' s family was notified of a change in condition within 24 hours, on August 9, 2024. This failure had the potential for Resident 1's family to not know the medical condition of Resident 1, and not be able to advocate and assist with making medical decisions based on the change of condition. Findings: On September 16, 2024, at 2:30 p.m., an unannounced visit to the facility on two complaints investigation was initiated. A review of Resident 1's medical records indicated she was originally admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of aphasia, (affects the ability to express and understand written and spoken language), after a stroke, urinary tract infection, (infection in the bladder), hydronephrosis, (caused by a blockage in the tube that connects the kidney to the bladder), with renal and ureteral calculi, (hard deposits made of minerals and salts that form inside the kidneys), Pressure ulcer injury,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse within two hours to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) after the allegation was made for two of three sampled residents (Residents A and C). This failure had the potential to result in further abuse. Findings: On May 29, 2024, at 9:40 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate an allegation of abuse. a. During an interview on May 29, 2024, at 1:17 p.m., with Resident A, she stated she was touched inappropriately three weeks ago by Resident B. Resident A further stated she felt dirty. During a review of Resident A's admission RECORD, indicated Resident A was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included depression (feelings of sadness) and schizoaffective disorder (a mental health disorder). During a review of Resident A's MDS (minimum data set- an assessment tool) dated April 30, 2024, indicated Brief Interview of Mental Status (a tool used to screen and identify the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of three residents reviewed, (Resident 1), a follow up call and/or assessment was done to verify durable medical equipment (DME) was provided to Resident 1 upon discharge as ordered. This failure had the potential to complicate Resident 1's recovery and had the potential for Resident 1 to suffer undue financial expenses for needed medical equipment. Findings: On November 20, 2023, at 8 a.m., a telephone interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 stated when he was discharged from the facility, the facility did not provide him with the ordered DME, and he had to purchase the equipment himself. On November 21, 2023, at 10:40 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility. On November 21, 2023, Resident 1's medical record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included rhabdomyolysis (a breakdown of muscle tissue that releases a damaging protein into the blood), acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the representative for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility applied a knee immobilizer to Resident 1. This failure had the potential to violate the rights Resident 1's representatives. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (impaired oxygen delivery to the brain), diabetes mellitus (inability to regulate blood sugar), and dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). The record further indicated the resident, and her daughter-in-law were the resident's responsible parties. A review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated June 9, 2023, indicated a score of 3 (severe cognitive impairment). A review of Resident 1's History and Physical dated June 9, 2023, indicated the resident was alert and oriented times one.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was offered or provided for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have increased pain which could impair mobility and function. Findings: On September 9, 2023, at 11:28 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for a complaint investigation. On September 9, 2023, at 12:10 p.m., Resident 1 was observed sitting on the edge of her bed. During a concurrent interview, Resident 1 stated she had been at the facility for about two months. Resident 1 stated she took routine pain medication for chronic pain. Resident 1 stated sometimes the medication was not available at the facility. Resident 1 stated her only concern was that the pain medication was not available consistently for her use and there was a delay in her receiving it. On September 9, 2023, Resident 1's record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services were provided to meet the needs of a resident when the physician ordered medications were not acquired by the facility timely and available for use, for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in the delay of treatment and care for Resident 1. Findings: On September 9, 2023, at 11:28 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for a complaint investigation. On September 9, 2023, at 12:10 p.m., Resident 1 was observed sitting on the edge of her bed. During a concurrent interview, Resident 1 stated she had been at the facility for about two months. Resident 1 stated she took routine pain medication for chronic pain. Resident 1 stated sometimes the medication was not available at the facility. Resident 1 stated she was told the medication could not be given because the facility needed authorization, and they were not able to contact the physician.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed, for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1), to maintain accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practice when the staff failed to accurately document medication given to Resident 1 on the medication administration record (eMAR). This failure could increase the potential for confusion to occur in the provision of care for Resident 1 and for Resident 1 to receive unnecessary duplicated medication. Findings: On September 9, 2023, at 11:28 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for a complaint investigation. On September 9, 2023, at 12:10 p.m., Resident 1 was observed sitting on the edge of her bed. During a concurrent interview, Resident 1 stated she had been at the facility for about two months. Resident 1 stated she took routine pain medication for chronic pain. Resident 1 stated sometimes the medication was not available at the facility. Resident 1 stated her only concern was that the pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) received colostomy care as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to suffer from infection, skin breakdown, and pain. Findings: On October 11, 2023, at 9:00 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility. A review of Resident 1's admission record dated October 11, 2023, indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included colostomy (an opening in the belly that's made during surgery with the end of the colon brought through this opening to form a stoma), abdominal abscess (pocket of infected fluid and pus located inside the belly), encephalopathy (disease, damage, or malfunction of the brain) and type 2 diabetes (a disease in which your blood sugar levels are too high). During an observation on October 11, 2023, at 9:15 a.m., of Resident 1's colostomy, the colostomy bag was full of fecal matter, bloated and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of three sampled residents, Resident 1, bedframe was properly maintained in safe operating condition. The brake on Resident 1's bed was malfunctioning, causing the bed to move from left to right while in the locked position. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk for entrapment, accident, and injury. Findings: On October 11, 2023, at 9:00 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility. A review of Resident 1's admission record dated October 11, 2023, indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included colostomy (an opening in the belly that's made during surgery with the end of the colon brought through this opening to form a stoma), abdominal abscess (pocket of infected fluid and pus located inside the belly), encephalopathy (disease, damage, or malfunction of the brain) and type 2 diabetes (a disease in which your blood sugar levels are too high). During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light (a device to alert nursing staff when a resident is in need) was within reach of one resident (Resident 1) out of a sample of three residents. This failure prevented Resident 1 from communicating his care needs and had the potential to increase his anxiety (a feeling of fear, and uneasiness). Findings: On October 11, 2023, at 9:00 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility. A review of Resident 1's admission record dated October 11, 2023, indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included colostomy (an opening in the belly that's made during surgery with the end of the colon brought through this opening to form a stoma), abdominal abscess (pocket of infected fluid and pus located inside the belly), encephalopathy (disease, damage, or malfunction of the brain) and type 2 diabetes (a disease in which your blood sugar levels are too high). During a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer pain medication in accordance with the facility policy and procedure for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to jeopardize the health and safety of Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm of unspecified site (cancer) and pressure ulcer of sacral region (tail bone). A review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated June 19, 2023, indicated the resident had a score of 10 (moderate cognitive impairment). A review of Resident 1's physician orders indicated the following: a. Morphine sulfate solution 20 mg/ml, give 0.25 ml by mouth every 2 hours as needed for mild breakthrough pain and give 0.5 ml by mouth every 2 hours as needed for moderate breakthrough pain AND give 1 ml by mouth every 2 hours as needed for severe breakthrough pain dated June 30,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control measures were implemented when: 1. One facility staff did not perform hand hygiene during, donning (putting on gloves and gown) and doffing (removing gloves and gown) of PPE (Personal Protective Equipment - mask, gown, gloves, face shield or goggles) inside the PUI Unit (Person Under Investigation - a resident suspected of having or exposed to COVID-19 [coronavirus-an illness caused by a virus that can spread from person to person]) upon meal pass; 2. A resident's urinal was placed on a bedside table beside a lunch tray; 3. A licensed nurse did not disinfect a medication tray during med pass; 4. One facility staff touched resident's meal with dirty gloves; 5. During multiple observations one facility staff was observed not wearing a face shield according to facility policy in a PUI room; 6. One facility staff during med pass did not perform hand hygiene between glove use; 7. Multiple staff were observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one of four residents (Resident 15) dignity when the resident was observed with long, dirty fingernails and with an unshaven face. This failure had the potential to affect resident's self-esteem and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During an observation on March 4, 2022, at 10:23 a.m., Resident 15 was observed with an unshaven beard. Resident 15 was observed with long and dirty fingernails. In a concurrent interview, Resident 15 stated he wanted to be shaved. He stated he has not been shaved in over a week. Resident 15 stated, he made a request for his nails to be trimmed. During an observation and interview on March 4, 2022, at 10:46 a.m., with the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1), she stated nails and beards should be assessed when giving a bath. CNA 1 stated, Resident 15's beard and fingernails were long and should have been taken care of during a shower. Resident 15's record was reviewed. Resident 15 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep Resident 11 free from verbal abuse when the staff, while exiting the room used foul language which was perceived by Resident 11 as being directed to her. This failure had the potential for Resident 11 to experience psychological harm. Findings: During an interview conducted on March 1, 2022, at 9:05 a.m., Resident 11 stated she had a verbal altercation with CNA 2 on February 20, 2022, and she and her roommate overheard Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 2) say an expletive phrase, (curse words in spanish) as he walked out of the resident's room. She stated that she cried and felt horrible. Resident 11 stated CNA 2 came into her room and stated, I will lose my license and have to go back to flipping burgers.She stated that she felt bad and did not want to, ruin this kids' life, but he shouldn't have said that to her. She reported that she cried and felt horrible. Resident 11 stated that she notified the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) the day of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse involving a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) and a resident, no later than 2 hours to the State Survey Agency, after the allegation was made. This failure had the potential to result in a delay of investigation which placed resident at risk for further abuse. Findings: During an interview conducted on March 1, 2022, at 9:05 a.m., Resident 11 stated she had a verbal altercation with CNA2 on February 20, 2022 and she and her roommate overheard Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 2) say an expletive phrase, (curse words in spanish) as he walked out of the resident's room. She stated that she cried and felt horrible. Resident 11 stated CNA 2 came into her room and stated, I will lose my license and have to go back to flipping burgers.She stated that she felt bad and did not want to, ruin this kids' life, but he shouldn't have said that to her. She reported that she cried and felt horrible. Resident 11 stated that she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address resident's dental problem, for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 37). This failure had the potential for staff not to be aware of the resident's dental needs and provide the necessary care. Findings: On March 1, 2022, at 8:39 a.m., Resident 37 was observed with a full upper denture and missing teeth on the lower portion of mouth. In a concurrent interview with Resident 37, he stated difficulty chewing food and required lower dentures. He stated a dental consultation was completed and no follow-up from staff. Resident 37's record was reviewed. Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebrovascular accident (interruption in the blood to cells in the brain) and mild protein calorie malnutrition (a medical condition when not consuming enough protein and calories-leads to muscle loss). A document titled, Nursing Admission/readmission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards during medication administration for one of three residents (Resident 54), when the Diclofenac Gel (medication used to treat pain) was not administered in accordance with the physician's order. This failure had the potential to result in not having the effective amount of medication at all times and prolonging the amount of time for the resident to feel relief. Findings: On March 1, 2022, at 4:29 p.m., during the medication administration observation, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) did not administer Diclofenac gel to Resident 54. Resident 54's record was reviewed. Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included asthma (a respiratory condition causing difficulty in breathing) and necrotizing fasciitis (infection that destroys tissue under skin). The Order Summary Report, for the month of March, 2022, indicated, .Diclofenac Sodium Gel 1% Apply topically four times a day for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide activities that met the interest for one of one residents reviewed (Resident 44). This failure had the potential to result in a decline in the physical, and emotional well-being of Resident 44. Findings: Resident 44 was observed on his iPad on multiple occasions: a. On February 28, 2022, at 4:27 p.m., playing game; b. On March 1, 2022, at 12:50 p.m., watching movie; c. On March 2, 2022, at 3:50 p.m., watching movie; and d. On March 3, 2022, at 9:50 a.m., playing game. A review of Resident 44's record indicated, he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included rheumatoid arthritis (inflammatory disorder affecting many joints, including those in the hands and feet.), scoliosis (abnormal shape of the spine), muscle wasting atrophy (weak muscles), and dysphagia (difficulty speaking). Resident 44's history and physical examination, dated December 23, 2021, indicated resident has the capacity to understand and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 25), when he was not re-evaluated for persistent swelling (edema) of bilateral lower extremities. This failure had the potential to result in the delay in treatment and further decline in resident's medical condition, affecting, psychosocial, mental, and physical well-being of Resident 25 Findings: On February 28, 2022, at 3:45 p.m., Resident 25 was observed with swelling to both lower extremities. In a concurrent interview with Resident 25, he stated he had swelling for a while. Resident 25's record was reviewed. Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included coronary artery disease (narrowing or blockage of coronary arteries). The document titled, Interact Change in Condition Evaluation, dated January 31, 2022, indicated, .resident bilateral legs and feet swollen and redness .bilateral leg edema +3 (pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% when: 1. For Resident 54, the medications Q-var inhaler (used to treat lung problem) and Diclofenac Sodium topical Gel 1% (used to treat pain) were not administered in accordance with the physician order. 2. For Resident 52, the medication [NAME] C tablet (B complex) was not available for administration. This failure resulted in a medication error rate of 6.12% which had the potential to which cause complications to an already compromised residents. Findings: 1. On March 1, 2022, at 4:29 p.m., during the medication administration observation, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) administered the following medications to Resident 54: - Sulfamethoxazole- Trimethoprim 800-160 mg (milligrams-unit of measurement) 1 tablet (used to treat infection); - Famotidine 20 mg 1 tablet (used to treat indigestion); - Metoprolol 50 mg 1 tablet (used to treat high blood pressure); - Methocarbamol 500 mg 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-04 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate diet texture was provided for one of one resident (Resident 37), when Resident 37 was having difficulty chewing food due to dental problem. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the resident's food intake which could cause a decline in nutritional health status of Resident 37. Findings: On March 1, 2022, at 8:39 a.m., Resident 37 was interviewed. Resident 37 stated he had difficulty chewing food especially if the meat served was tough. Resident 37 stated he was using his old full upper dentures and had only four teeth on the bottom. Resident 37 stated he did not have partial lower dentures. He stated he followed-up with the staff but he did not get any response. Resident 37's record was reviewed. Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular disease (interruption in the blood to cells in the brain) and mild protein calorie malnutrition (a medical condition when not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,827 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,827 — penalty dated 2024-12-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ARAMBULA, ALEJANDRAIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/27/2023
MCCUSKER, CARSONIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2023
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$21.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.5M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 3%Medicare 43%Other / private 54%

This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$555per resident / day
operating cost
$16,874per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$640per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555921. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next