No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Napa Valley Care Center

3275 Villa Lane, Napa, CA 94558 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (707) 257-0931 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (707) 257-0931 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)2 actual-harm citations$30,259 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (64) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $30,259 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-13)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1141 Pear Tree Ln · (707) 254-1770 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
675 Trancas St · (707) 252-2844 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
611 Trancas St · (707) 224-8583 · Call to confirm hours
Park
· (707) 257-9529 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
721 Trancas St · (707) 927-5869

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.6%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.7%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.1%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.2%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.9%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.8%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.4%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.7%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.4%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.0%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.8%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.642.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.261.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 301 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
71.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 71.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 99 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.5%CMS range 51.8–64.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 8.2–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge71.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge69.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting94.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 5.0–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
1.26
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.81
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
24.6%
Total nursing turnover
14.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 126.3 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-25)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2021-09-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

64 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2 & Resident 3) were provided with activities of daily living (ADLs-Activities related to personal care such as dressing, bathing and toileting) as required in their comprehensive care plans. The three residents were not provided with incontinence care (Cleaning the skin and changing the soiled undergarments and clothing of people with bowel or bladder incontinence [inability to control urination and defecation (The discharge of feces from the body)]), and two residents (Resident 1 & Resident 2) were not provided with bed repositioning as needed. Resident 1 indicated having suffered serious psychological and emotional harm as a result of this lack of care including depression, feelings of neglect and discrimination, and anxiety attacks. These findings also had the potential to result in skin issues, infections, feelings of loss of dignity and neglect to Resident 2 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2021-09-21 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to arrange a follow-up appointment for vision care for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 60) when Resident 60 verbalized she could not see well and needed new eyeglass. This failure resulted to Resident 60's inability to pursue her interest to read, stopped Resident 60 from watching T.V., feeling sad and uncomfortable because of headaches. Findings: During a clinical record review for Resident 60, the Progress Notes dated 11/17/20 indicated, the Director of Staff Development (DSD) spoke to the Nurse Practitioner (NP) about Resident 60's need for a new eyeglass. The NP stated to make an appointment for Resident 60. DSD called the Optical office but there was no available appointment. The optical office would call the facility when appointment was available. During a clinical record review for Resident 60, the Vision Care Plan dated 02/12/21 indicated Resident 60 had altered visual ability related to: Glaucoma (a condition of increased pressure within the eyeball, causing gradual loss of sight), Cataracts (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) were protected from abuse when Resident 1 and Resident 2 threw fluids at one another, exchanged verbal profanities, and Resident 2 hit Resident 1 on the shoulder. This failure resulted in an altercation between Resident 1 and Resident 2 and placed both residents at risk for physical and psychological harm. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility in April 2025 with medical diagnosis which included cirrhosis of the liver (permanent scarring of healthy liver [an organ that filters toxins, produces bile for digestion and regulates blood sugar] tissue) and cerebellar ataxia (damage to a part of the brain that regulates balance, posture and muscle coordination). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 6/25/26, indicated her Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS-a cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a staff member did not close the privacy curtain before providing incontinence care. This resulted in another resident observing Resident 1's exposed buttocks, after which the staff member laughed.This failure caused Resident 1 to experience embarrassment, humiliation, and diminished dignity, and created the potential for emotional distress, loss of trust in facility staff, and reluctance to request assistance with personal care. A review of Resident 1's admission Record (facility demographic), indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary admitting diagnosis of Hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (total or partial paralysis of one side of the body) following a Cerebral Infarction (brain stroke) affecting the dominant left side of his body.A record review of the report submitted by the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in safe and sanitary conditions in the food service department when:1. The walk-in fridge contained food items that were not labeled.2. The walk-in fridge and freezer number #3 contained food items that were expired.These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for developing food-borne illnesses (sickness by consuming contaminated food or drinks) by exposing residents to contaminated food and unsanitary practices.Findings:1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/21/2025 at 1:35 p.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM) in the kitchen's walk-in fridge, there was an opened bag of parsley with the date of 7/20/2025, a container with eight red onions with an expiration date of 7/12/2025, and two boxes of fully cooked bacon with no date. The DM stated that the parsley, red onions and fully cooked bacon were expired and should be discarded to prevent food-borne illnesses.During an interview on 7/24/2025 at 8:10 a.m. with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the RD stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and implement infection control practices and maintain a sanitary environment when:1. A contact precaution order was not in place when Resident 125 was identified to have a multidrug resistance organism (MDRO, a bacteria that have developed resistance to multiple antibiotics).2. Dirty items were found stored in the clean shower.3. An unlabeled urinal was found stored in a bathroom sink next to oral hygiene items in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Unlabeled oral hygiene items were found stored on top of a toilet lid in room [ROOM NUMBER].4. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- safety measures in place for residents with wounds or indwelling devices) was not implemented for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 7) with a wound vac (medical device that heals slow-healing wounds by using gentle suction).These failures had the potential to result in the spread of infectious diseases amongst residents, staff, and visitors.Findings: 1. During a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written transfer notification to one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 6) or to his representative upon Resident 6's transfer to an acute care hospital on 4/2/2025. This failure had the potential for Resident 6 and/or his representative not to be informed of his rights to return to the facility following a hospitalization. Findings:During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, dated 7/22/2025, the admission Record indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition where the lungs cannot adequately exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide). During a review or Resident 6's Progress Notes, dated 4/2/2025, the Progress Notes indicated at 10:28 p.m., Resident 6 appeared to be jaundice (a condition characterized by the yellowing of the skin, mucous membranes, and whites of the eyes) and confused. The physician was notified of the altered mental status (a change in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate and create a care plan (an individualized plan that provides direction on the type of care a patient needs) for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 125), when Resident 125 was placed on contact precautions (infection control measures used to prevent the spread of infectious agents that can be transmitted through direct or indirect contact with a resident or their environment) on 5/12/2025. This failure had the potential to not provide the necessary care and treatment for Resident 125.Findings:During a review of Resident 125's admission Record, dated 7/22/2025, the admission Record indicated Resident 125 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of facial weakness following a cerebral infarction (when blood supply to part of the brain is blocked or reduced).During an interview on 7/21/2025 at 5:14 p.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP), IP stated Resident 125 was on contact precautions because Resident 125 had a wound on his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable well-being for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 96) when there were no documented evidence Resident 96 was exhibiting wandering behavior prior to placing a wander guard bracelet (a wearable device designed to help prevent residents at risk of wandering from leaving a designated area in a care facility). This failure resulted in Resident 96's quality of life being negatively affected when Resident 96 stated he could not do the things he likes to do.Findings:During a review of Resident 96's admission Record, dated 7/22/2025, the admission Record indicated Resident 96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where the brain's function is impaired due to an underlying condition such as electrolyte imbalances and infections) and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 96's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 30 sampled Residents (Residents 36 and 53) that:1.Resident 36's oxygen therapy was reviewed and updated to reflect her current clinical status. This failure had the potential to compromise the care provided to Resident 36.2.Residents 53's nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen through the nose) was labeled and stored appropriately. This failure had the potential for residents to be exposed to infectious diseases. Findings:1. During a review of Resident 36's admission Record, dated 7/22/2025, the admission Record indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of heart failure. During a review of Resident 36's Physician's order, dated 1/8/2025 and 1/17/2025, the physician's order indicated Oxygen at 2 liters/minute (unit of measurement) by nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen through the nose), continuously for CHF (Congestive Heart Failure, a condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to respond to call lights in a timely manner for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 113). This failure resulted in Resident 113 experiencing long wait times and feelings of neglect.Findings:During a review of Resident 113's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a health status screening and assessment tool), dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 113 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis (disease that affects the nervous system and can lead to problems with movement and balance) and muscle weakness.During a review of Resident 113's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated [DATE], the quarterly MDS assessment indicated in Section GG: Functional Abilities and Goals: that Resident 113 ambulated by wheelchair and required moderate assistance with the following tasks: (1) the ability to bathe and dry self, (2) the ability to dress and undress above the waist, (3) the ability to dress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not greater than five percent when four identified medication errors out of 27 opportunities were observed:1. Vancomycin (antibiotic used to treat serious bacterial infections) solution was not administered per medication label instructions for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 50).2. Insulin Aspart (rapid acting medication used to decrease blood sugar) was administered at the wrong time for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 39).3. Albuterol (medication used to prevent and treat breathing difficulties) was not administered per physician instructions for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 16).4. Eliquis (medication to prevent and treat blood clots) was not administered per physician instructions for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 16).These failures resulted in an overall facility medication error rate of 14.81% and had the potential to result in negative health outcomes for Resident 16,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 52 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 39) remained free from significant medication error when rapid acting insulin (medication used to decrease blood sugar) was administered at the wrong time.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 39 experiencing adverse complications from hypoglycemia (condition in which blood sugar level drops below normal) including dizziness, sleepiness, passing out or death. Findings:During a review of Resident 39's Face Sheet (Resident Demographics), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (disease that causes blood sugar levels to be high).During an observation on 7/23/2025 at 3:35 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2), in Resident 39's room, LVN 2 administered Insulin Aspart (rapid acting medication used to decrease blood sugar) 2 units (unit of measurement) via flex pen (injection device).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart (a cart that contains medications for residents) was locked while not in use and unattended. This failure had the potential to allow residents, staff and visitors to gain access to the medication cart.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/21/2025 at 1:50 p.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP) on Unit 1A, the medication cart was observed unlocked and unattended. IP stated the medication cart should be locked when not in use.During an interview on 7/22/2025 at 8:47 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the medication carts should be locked at all times when not in use.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Storage of Medications, revised April 2007, the P&P indicated, Compartments .containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the garbage was disposed of properly, when a garbage can lid and a garbage compactor (a machine that reduces the volume of trash by compacting it), were not closed and the surrounding area had piles of trash bags on the ground.This failure resulted in pest attraction and odor in the garbage disposal area.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/23/2025 at 11:50 a.m., with the Housekeeping Supervisor (HS), in the garbage disposal area, the garbage compactor was not closed, the surrounding area had piles of trash bags on the ground with flies and a foul odor. The HS stated the compactor should be covered when not in use to prevent odor and to prevent attracting pests.During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/24/2025 at 7:50 a.m., with Housekeeping (HK), in the garbage disposal area, one of the garbage can lids was opened with birds flying in and out of the garbage can. Housekeeping (HK) stated the garbage can lid needed to be closed to prevent harborage of rodents or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a speech therapy evaluation for one of 30 sampled residents (Resident 60) was performed when ordered by the physician.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 60 receiving an inappropriate diet, choking or weight loss.Findings:During a review of Resident 60's Face Sheet (Resident Demographics), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Myasthenia Gravis (chronic autoimmune disease that causes muscle weakness) and Parkinson's Disease (brain disorder that causes uncontrollable body movements).During a review of Resident 60's Physician Orders, dated 6/11/2025, the physician orders indicated, a speech therapy evaluation was ordered for Resident 60 on 6/11/2025 at 11:13 a.m. There was no documentation in Resident 60's record which indicated the speech therapy consult had been performed (43 days later).During an interview on 7/24/2025 at 2:44 p.m. with the Speech Therapist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary and comfortable environment when the Stop sign banners in Hallway 3A had hair and lint on the velcro areas of the banners. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the residents' homelike environment. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/21/2025 at 2:45 p.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), three Stop sign banners were hanging on Hallway 3A rails next to rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. The Stop sign banners had hair and lint on the velcro areas. The DSD stated the Stop sign banners are put on the door to prevent wandering residents from going into residents room. The DSD confirmed the hair and lint on the velcro areas on the three Stop sign banners.During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/21/2025 at 3:25 p.m., with Housekeeping (HK), HK confirmed the hair and lint on the velcro areas on the three Stop sign banners hanging on Hallway 3A rails next to rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. HK…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin when one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was found to have extensive bruising and pain to his left leg, that ultimately was found to be a fractured femur (broken thighbone, the longest and strongest bone in the human body) in the emergency department (ED), and facility staff were unable to explain how Resident 1 got the bruise. This failure prevented outside agencies from investigating the injury of a vulnerable resident who was nonverbal and unable to advocate for himself or explain how he was injured. Findings: During a record review on 5/8/25 at 11:06 a.m., Resident 1's face sheet indicated an admission date of 11/10/21 and multiple medical diagnoses including Lewy Body dementia (a progressive brain disorder causing problems with thinking, movement, mood, and behavior). Review of Resident 1's nurse progress note dated 5/3/25 at 2:15 p.m. indicated, This nurse was called to room [approximately] 11am by CNA's [certified nursing assistants] to show me the residents [left] leg. Upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control policy when disposable razors were found either on top or partially inserted into sharps containers (containers specifically designed for items that are both contaminated and pose a puncture risk) in three communal (used or shared by multiple residents) shower/tub rooms. This failure had the potential risk of subjecting staff and residents to injury and blood-borne pathogen (infectious bacteria, virus, or fungus that can cause disease when transmitted through blood or other body fluids) transmission. Findings: During an observation on 4/8/25 at 11:00 a.m., the station three tub room was observed. There was a blue disposable razor partially inserted through the lid mechanism. There was no protective cover observed on the razor, leaving the sharp portion exposed. During an observation on 4/8/25 at 11:17 a.m. in the station three shower room, two blue disposable razors were found atop the sharps container lid. The sharps container was full of used disposable razors. During an observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the safety one of two sampled residents when a staff member solely operated a mechanical lift to transfer Resident 1 from the bed to a recliner. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to fall and sustain a hematoma (a closed wound where blood collects and fills a space) on her head. Findings: A review of Intake Information dated 2/10/25 indicated a complaint alleging Resident 1 sustaining a fall as she was transferred from bed to a chair on 2/9/25. A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet indicated she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (a disease resulting in the damage to the nerves in the brain, spinal cord, and nerves) and dementia (a general term for loss of memory and other mental abilities severe enough to interfere with daily life). Resident 1's Progress Notes , dated 2/9/25 , indicated, Resident had a witnessed fall while transferring to chair. Aide reported that while she was transferring via [product brand] lift to chair, the chair tipped over and resident fell backwards…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notification of the hospital transfer for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) to her Responsible Party (RP). Failure to notify the Responsible Party (RP) of Resident 1's whereabouts had the potential for an inability for her to advocate for Resident 1's needs and preferences during the transfer process, and coordinate care with the receiving hospital. Findings: A review of Intake Information dated 12/13/24 indicated RP was not notified of Resident 1's transfer to acute care, nor of any bed hold policy. A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet indicated she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including schizophrenia and left femur (thigh bone) fracture. Resident 1's Face Sheet indicated RP's name, call phone number and mailing address were listed under her Contacts . Further review of Resident 1's records indicated she was transferred to acute care for chest pain and fainting on 11/27/24. During an interview on 1/9/25 at 12:15 p.m., Licensed Staff B stated residents' families and responsible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy (A medical treatment that provides supplemental or extra oxygen for breathing) was provided as ordered by the physician for two of two sampled residents on continuous supplemental oxygen (Resident 5 & Resident 6) when the nasal cannulas (A device consisting of a lightweight tube used to deliver supplemental oxygen) were not observed to be in their noses in the early morning hours of 10/08/24, and the oxygen settings were incorrect. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the administration of oxygen therapy was documented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 4). These findings had the potential to result in harm, suffering and death to the residents on oxygen therapy. Findings: Record review of Resident 4's Face Sheet (Facility demographic) indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (A chronic, progressive brain disorder that causes movement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide enough nursing staff to deliver the nursing and related care and services required by the residents. Three of three unlicensed staff interviewed (Anonymous Staff D, Anonymous Staff E, and Anonymous Staff F) indicated the facility was extremely short-staffed for certified nursing assistants (CNAs), and this affected the quality of care the residents were receiving. This finding had the potential to result in inability for the residents to reach their full potential, neglect, and feelings of abandonment and frustration. Findings: Record review of Resident 4's Face Sheet (Facility demographic) indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (A chronic, progressive brain disorder that causes movement problems, stiffness, and other symptoms) and Acute Respiratory Failure (Acute respiratory failure is defined as the inability of the respiratory system to meet the oxygenation, ventilation, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was treated with dignity and respect when two certified nursing assistants (Unlicensed Staff A and Unlicensed Staff B) attempted to provide incontinence care (Cleaning the private areas and changing the undergarments of a patient with loss of bowel or bladder control) to Resident 1 against her wishes. This finding had the potential to result in injuries to Resident 1, frustration, sadness, and trauma. Findings: Record review of the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Hemiplegia (Severe or complete loss of strength on one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (Weakness or inability to move one side of the body). Record review of Resident 1's MDS (Minimum Data Sheet-An assessment tool) dated 8/28/24 indicated her BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status-A cognition [the mental action or process of acquiring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within two hours to the DEPARTMENT for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This finding had the potential to result in inability for the DEPARTMENT to investigate and advocate for Resident 1's rights, and possible continuous abuse to Resident 1 and other residents of the facility. Findings: Record review of the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Hemiplegia (Severe or complete loss of strength on one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (Weakness or inability to move one side of the body). Record review of a nursing note dated 8/08/24 at 10:53 a.m., indicated, Resident [Resident 1] was complaining NOC (night) shift CAN (Certified Nursing Assistant). this nurse and DSD (Director of Staff Development) went her (Sic) room asked her what happened last night. resident stated when CNA cleaned her they held her hand and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents at risk for elopement (Resident 3) eloped from the facility, when several steps to prevent it, such as completing the elopement risk assessment, creating a care plan to prevent elopement, and initiating interventions to keep her safe, were omitted. Resident 3 eloped form the facility on 8/20/24 while being COVID-19 positive and was found a block away from the facility on a high traffic street, by police. This failure had the potential to result in serious harm, including death, to Resident 3. This failure placed other residents of the facility and residents of the community at risk for becoming infected with COVID-19, a contagious and potentially deadly illness. Findings: Record review of Resident 3's Face Sheet (Resident demographics) indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (A chronic, progressive brain disorder that causes movement problems,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure there were adequate staff to care for three out of three sampled residents (Residents 2,3 and 4) needs when: 1. Residents 2, 3 and 4 complained of staffs late response to call lights and late provision of care due to short staffing. 2. Unlicensed staff statements the facility was short staffed, stating they have difficulty meeting their residents needs timely, or completing their task timely. These failures resulted in: 1a Resident 2 feeling frustrated, anxious, and afraid staff would not be available to assist her in case of a medical emergency. 1b Resident 3 feeling frustrated and upset waiting for a long time before staff responds to call light and 1c Resident 4 feeling unsafe and in fear something might happen to her and there would be no staff to assist her when she needed medical attention. These failures could also put the residents at risk for falls, injuries, accidents, late provision of care or care not being rendered at all.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-24 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1.ensure six out of nine licensed staff (Licensed Staff A,B, C, E, F and G) were aware of the facility ' s Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP, a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials, including antibiotics- a group of agents that share the common aim of reducing the possibility of infection and sepsis (body's extreme reaction to an infection). 2.promote the appropriate use of antibiotics when the antibiotic was prescribed without proper indication and no attempts were made by the facility to reassess the need for continued antibiotic use for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 received the antibiotic Augmentin ES-600 oral suspension 5 milliliters (ml, a unit of measurement) by mouth two times a day for Aspiration Pneumonia (infection of the lungs that occurs when food or liquid is breathed into the lungs instead of being swallowed) from 6/18/24 up to 6/25/24 for a total of 8 days and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when Licensed Staff C allowed family members to administer medication to one out of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure was a safety risk and could potentially lead to incorrect dose administration and lack of patient education. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s face sheet (demographics) indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included chronic kidney disease stage 3A (CKD, mild to moderate loss of kidney function), Cachexia (significant loss of muscle and adipose tissue- body fat) and Hyperlipidemia (HLP, high levels of fats (lipids) in your blood). A review of Resident 1 ' s Data Sheet Assessment (MDS, a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) dated 5/29/24, indicated Resident 1 needed maximal assistance up to dependent on staff for provision of personal care. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff wore face masks appropriately in patient care areas during a covid outbreak in the facility. This failure had the potential to spread infections among residents in the facility. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 2/2/24 at 11:45 a.m., a nurse was standing at a medication cart with her mask pulled down below her chin while talking on her cell phone in the hallway outside a resident room. Continuing the observation, a nurse at the Station 3 nurses ' station was sitting at a computer with her mask pulled down under her chin. When queried, Licensed Nurse A stated she needed a break from her mask. When asked the reason N95 masks were required in the facility, Licensed Nurse A stated it was because of the current COVID outbreak in the building. Licensed Nurse A stated she should go to the break room if she needed to take off her mask. During an interview on 2/2/24 at 2:20 p.m., Anonymous Resident stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food at a palatable temperature when a test tray of beef stroganoff with noodles was not at a palatable temperature. This failure resulted in two anonymous residents complaining that hot foods were served cold. Findings: On 1/17/24, the Department received an anonymous complaint that indicated, food is cold/inedible. During an interview on 2/2/24 at 11:10 a.m., an anonymous resident, who had been living at the facility for over a year, verified hot foods were served cold, especially hamburgers. During an observation on 2/16/24 at 12:38 p.m. with Registered Dietitian, a test tray of beef stroganoff with noodles, revealed the beef was warm, not hot, and the noodles were cold. The beef was 116 degrees Fahrenheit, and the noodles were 92 degrees Fahrenheit. Both surveyors testing the tray agreed the temperature of the food was not palatable and needed to be warmer. Review of facility policy Food and Nutrition Services, revised 10/2017, indicated, Each resident is provided a nourishing, palatable,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine in the kitchen was sanitized and maintained to prevent buildup of water deposits on outer surface. This had the potential for cross contamination and the spread of water borne pathogens to the residents that use ice in the facility. Findings: During an observation on 2/2/2024 at 10:07 a.m., The ice machine in the facility ' s kitchen had a visible white crust like substance, dust, and water stain marks on the exterior surface of the top front panel. Also, there was a panel on the left side of the ice maker that was not completely secured. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/2/2024 at 10:15 a.m., with the Registered Dietitian (RD), after showing her the surfaces on the ice machine, the RD acknowledged there was build-up on the front surface. The RD stated the maintenance director (MD) was responsible for cleaning and sanitizing the ice machine. Also, The RD confirmed ice machine was last cleaned on 1/30/2024 as indicated on the maintenance log posted on the front of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for the residents when the walls of the residents ' communal areas and showers had crumbling dry wall, a loose tile, and a brownish black substance on the grout. This had the potential to result in residents feeling that the facility is not being maintained. Findings: On 1/17/24, the Department received an anonymous complaint that indicated, Black mold in showers. During an observation on 2/2/24 at 9:54 a.m., the resident shower next to resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a brownish black substance on the grout between the tiles and the wall at the entrance to the shower had crumbling drywall that exposed the metal supports underneath it. During an observation on 2/2/24 at 10:29 a.m., the cabinet under the sink in the activity room/dining room had a brownish black substance in the corner on the caulking between the wall and the cabinet. The corner of the wall adjacent to the sink was cracked and crumbling where…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries (bedsores) to one of two residents (Resident 1), when the facility did not frequently and regularly turn and reposition Resident 1, who could not turn and reposition herself independently, and was at risk for developing pressure injuries. This failure resulted in Resident 1 developing two unstageable (unable to determine the exact extent of the wounds) pressure injuries, one on her sacrum (the tailbone area) and one on her buttocks area. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s Facesheet indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of hip fracture. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Assessment, which included a Skin Assessment, dated 6/7/22, indicated Resident 1 ' s skin was intact and had no pressure injuries. A review of Resident 1 ' s Braden Scale assessment (a standardized assessment that indicates the resident ' s risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment to one of three residents (Resident 1) when the reading light above Resident 1's bed and the outlet in Resident 1's bathroom did not work. This failure resulted in Resident 1's not being able to read while in bed and not being able to charge her cell phone in the bathroom. Findings: During an interview on 11/8/23, at 10:20 a.m., Resident 1 stated her bed light and the outlet in the bathroom did not work. Resident 1 stated she used the bed light to read while in bed and the outlet in the bathroom to charge her cell phone. During a concurrent observation, the Maintenance Director tested the operation of the bed light and the bathroom outlet and confirmed both were non-operational. A review of facility policy and procedure titled Maintenance Service , revised December 2009, indicated: The Maintenance Department is responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner at all times.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue the notice of discharge as soon as practicable to two of three residents (Residents 2 and 3); failed to timely provide a copy of the notice of discharge to the Ombudsman for three of three residents (Residents 1, 2 and 3); and failed to indicate a valid reason for discharge and to list the name of address of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman and location to which the resident would be discharged on the notice of discharge to one of three residents (Resident 1). These failures could have resulted in Residents 2 and 3 not having enough time to prepare for discharge from the facility; the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman not assisting Residents 1, 2 and 3 during the discharge process; and Resident 3 not knowing where she would be discharge to. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an interview and record review on 10/17/23, at 1 p.m., Resident 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident discharges in accordance with federal regulations for one of three residents (Resident 1) when the facility initiated the discharge of Resident 1 for the reasons of lack of insurance coverage and non-payment before Resident 1's insurance coverage lapsed and before non-payment by Resident 1's for charges related to her stay at the facility. This failure resulted in Resident 1 being subject to an invalid discharge process. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an interview and record review on 10/17/23, at 1 p.m., Resident 1 stated on 10/11/23 the facility provided her a letter indicating she had to leave the facility within 30 days. A review of the letter indicate it was dated 10/11/23, addressed to Resident 1, signed by the Administrator, titled 30 Day Notice to Vacate [Facility] , and indicated that Resident 1 will be discharged from the facility on 11/10/23 due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and records review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from significant medication errors, when Resident 1 had a physician ' s order for 1) Dilaudid (an opioid [class of drugs that derive from, or mimic, natural substances found in the opium poppy plant] - used to relieve moderate to severe pain) 4 mg (milligram-a unit of mass) to give one tablet three times a day for pain management; and 2) Roxycodone (also an opioid) 5 mg to give 2 tablets every 4 hours as needed for pain management; however, the facility did not administer the medication according to the physician ' s order. This failure had the potential to result in ineffective pain management, over sedation, or possible dependence or addiction to the medication. Findings: Review of the Face sheet (A one-page summary of important information about a resident) indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Fracture (break in a bone) of the Sacrum (the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to implement a physician ' s order for pain management for two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when: 1. Resident 1 had a physician ' s order for Dilaudid (an opioid [class of drugs that derive from, or mimic, natural substances found in the opium poppy plant] used to relieve moderate to severe pain) 4 mg (milligram-a unit of mass) to be given three times a day for pain management; however, the facility did not administer the medication according to the physician ' s order. This failure had caused Resident 1 to experience moderate to severe pain which prevented him to sleep during the night and prevented him to participate with occupational therapy (a form of therapy for those recuperating from physical or mental illness that encourages rehabilitation through the performance of activities required in daily life). 2. Resident 2 had a physician ' s order for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (a combination of opioid pain medication -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not have sufficient staff to meet the care needs of three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2 & Resident 3) when they were not provided with activities of daily living (ADLs-Activities related to personal care such as bathing and toileting) as required, and call lights were not answered promptly. The night of 8/11/23 one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was assigned to provide services to 43 residents. In addition, staffing shortages occurred in all shifts. These findings had the potential to result in harm to the residents involved, inability for staff to respond to medical emergencies, and lack of health services provided to the residents of the facility. Findings: Record review of a report sent to the DEPARTMENT on 8/14/23 indicated the facility was, tremendously, understaffed, and on the night of 8/11/23 one CNA has been ensigned the entire section 3 of the facility (Which based on the facility census on 8/11/23, housed 43 residents).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' meals were palatable, appetizing and safe for ingestion. Three of four sampled residents (Resident 3, Resident 4 and Resident 5) complained about the food quality and taste. These findings could have resulted in decreased caloric intake, malnutrition, frustration, and decreased quality of life for the residents of the facility. Findings: Record review of a report sent to the DEPARTMENT on 8/14/23 indicated the food was not edible, and the facility was out of several essential food items such as milk and butter. During an interview on 8/23/23 at 10:20 a.m., with Resident 3, she stated the food needed to be improved as it was often not appetizing. Resident 3 stated the meat was hard and difficult to cut, and the flavor was fair. Resident 3 stated she lost a lot of weight when she was first admitted to the facility as a result of the food not being appetizing, but she had since adjusted. During an interview with Dietary Staff F on 9/13/23 at 6:53 a.m., she confirmed the facility did run out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) was treated with dignity and respect when he was noted to be resting in bed in the early morning hours, with no blanket, no bed linens, and no clothing except for his disposable attends (A form of undergarment designed to be used / worn once and then thrown away), and a thin top sheet. Resident 2 voiced being terribly cold on multiple occasions, and when the call light was pressed to alert staff he needed a blanket, it took 10 minutes for a staff member to respond to it. These findings had the potential to result in suffering, frustration and feelings of distress for Resident 2. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus (A chronic disease characterized by high levels of blood sugar) and Cognitive Disorder with Lewy bodies (A condition that affects brain regions involved in thinking, memory and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document in the facility assessment, the resources necessary to care for its residents competently during day-to-day operations. The staffing section on the facility assessment made it impossible to determine how many Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were needed based on the census, condition of residents, or any other category that would provide specific information on the number of required CNAs per shift to meet the residents' needs. As a result, there were days and nights when the facility was extremely short staffed, including the night shift of 8/11/23, when one CNA (Unlicensed Staff E) was assigned 43 residents requiring assistance with ADLs (Activities related to personal care such as dressing, bathing and toileting). These findings had the potential to result in lack of nursing services, decreased quality of life and neglect to the residents of the facility. Findings: Record review of the staffing timesheets for August, 2023, indicated Unlicensed Staff E was assigned to care for 43 residents the night shift of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-09-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare foods in a safe and sanitary environment when: 1. Cool down process for prepared food was not monitored 2. No air gap in the food production sink 3. Food storage were dirty 4. Food items were not labeled and dated 5. Dented cans of tomato sauce were in the dry storage area These failures could have resulted in foodborne illness and allergies to all residents in the facility. Findings: 1. During an interview on 9/14/21, at 9:45 a.m., Dietary Staff U was asked about tuna salad preparation. Dietary Staff U stated, she got the tuna from the dry storage and mixed all the ingredients together. Dietary Staff U was asked if she ever took the temperature of the tuna salad and she stated, she took temperature of the tuna salad after making it but there was no log to show that temperature was taken and monitored. During an interview on 9/14/21, at 9:55 a.m., Dietary Staff V was asked about Turkey salad preparation. Dietary Staff V stated, Turkey was pre-cooked and was in the fridge and they just mixed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-09-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor residents for potential COVID-19 infection when six of seven residents sampled for COVID-19 screening review (Residents 6, 46, 54, 60, 66, 91) were not monitored for symptoms of COVID-19, even after identifying a resident positive for COVID-19 in the facility. This failure could potentially lead to undetected COVID-19 infections in residents, spread of COVID-19 amongst staff and residents, hospitalizations, or death. Findings: During an interview on 9/13/21, at 9:57 a.m., Administrator stated there were no Covid Positive residents in the facility. During an observation and interview on 9/13/21, at 10:55 a.m., a staff wearing a face mask and a face shield was observed entering Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], after using alcohol hand sanitizer and donning gown, gloves. During an observation on 9/13/21, in the main corridor that led into hallway one, a sign indicated YELLOW ZONE. During an interview, on Nursing Station #1, on 9/13/21, at 12:25 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement person-centered care plans for 2 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 60 & Resident 53) when: 1 a. Resident 60 was found to have three broken/ decayed teeth after a dental exam and the facility did not develop a dental care plan to address prevention of potential complications from broken/ decayed teeth. This failure resulted in staff not assessing Resident 60 for dental problem. b. Resident 60 had verbalized she needed new eyeglass because could not see well and the facility did not implement their interventions as listed in Resident 60's vision care plan. This failure resulted in Resident 60 refusing to participate with activities of interest, feeling uncomfortable and sad.(Reference F 685). 2) Resident 53 was receiving food through a gastric tube (a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach) to meet his nutritional needs and the facility did not develop an individualized care plan. This failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement timely revision of comprehensive care plan for 2 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 60 and Resident 7) when: 1) Resident 60 had two incidents of accidental fall in a 43-day period which caused Resident 60 to experience physical discomfort; 2) Resident 7 had a care plan for assessment of medication side affects, for medications she was not prescribed for six years. This caused a pattern of yelling, screaming and anxiety for Resident 7 and other residents. This failure puts Resident 60 at risk for more incidents of falling that could potentially result to serious injuries or death, and Resident 7 at risk for not receiving medications that would reduce her non compliance and disruptive behavior. Findings: During a clinical record review for Resident 60, the Progress Notes dated 05/18/2021 at 11:39 p.m., indicated Resident 60 had a fall at 07:30 p.m. that day. During a clinical record review for Resident 60, the Progress Notes dated 05/19/21 at 02:00 p.m., indicated Resident 60 was noted with redness at the corner of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-21 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure person centered care when pharmacological interventions for behaviors were not considered after non-pharmacological interventions were ineffective, for one sampled resident (Resident #7). This failure to review and consider medication therapy for behaviors related to a primary diagnosis of Schizoaffective disorder (Schizoaffective disorder is a chronic mental health condition characterized primarily by symptoms of schizophrenia, such as hallucinations or delusions, and symptoms of a mood disorder, such as mania and depression.), and depression had the potential to result in increased anxiety, non-compliant behavior and contribute to increased agitation and behaviors. Findings: During an observation on 9/13/21, at 10:30 a.m., Resident #7's door was open, and she was yelling at anyone passing her room to remove a trash can located at the foot of her bed. Multiple staff were observed explaining to her the trash can was necessary for disposal of gowns and gloves. Resident #7's agitation increased as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-21 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient number of dietary staff to provide food and nutrition services needed by the residents and to maintain cleanliness of the food storage units. This failure resulted in: 1. Freezers and refrigerators were not cleaned 2. Residents' food preferences were not updated 3. Not enough time to train dietary staff Findings: 1. During an observation in the initial tour of the kitchen on 9/13/21, at 9:56 a.m., freezer one was observed with dried brownish dirt on the freezer floor and freezer three had corn bits and dried yellowish-brownish dirt on the freezer floor. During an interview on 9/16/21, at 9:59 a.m., Registered Dietician (RD) was asked about kitchen and food storage cleaning. RD stated, they usually do it as a team but, with staffing issue she did not have enough staff, they cannot do it. RD stated, there was a professional cleaning company for food services that deep clean the entire kitchen on 9/3/21. RD was asked if the refrigerator and freezers were included in the deep clean and RD stated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow menus for: 1. five residents on renal diet and 17 residents on heart healthy diet 2. seven residents on pureed diet 3. 12 residents on fortified diet 4. 28 residents on mechanical soft/ground diet These failure resulted in residents not receiving their physician ordered diets and could result in residents not getting their nutritional needs to maintain normal body weight. Findings: 1. A review of facility's menu spreadsheet for 9/13/21 indicated, residents on renal and heart healthy diet, should receive diet salad dressing for the green salad. During an observation on 9/13/21, at 11:36 a.m., lunch tray line was observed. All residents that were served green salad had either regular Italian or regular Balsamic Vinegar dressing. During an interview on 9/16/21, at 9:59 a.m., Registered Dietician (RD) was asked about the salad dressing served on 9/13/21 for renal and heart healthy diet residents. RD stated they served standard dressing to renal and heart healthy diet residents because they did not have the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Provide food preferences to three sampled residents (Resident 36, 86 and 72). 2. Offer food substitute to five sampled residents (Resident 36, 86, 113, 157 and 158). These failures could result to residents losing appetite and potential weight loss. Findings: During an interview on 9/13/21 at 12:05 p.m., Resident 72 stated she was always given eggs, but she did not eat eggs. Resident 72 stated she had told the staff she did not like eggs, but they brought it to her anyway. During an interview on 9/13/21, at 11:10 a.m., Resident #157 stated the food was industrial, and not good. He stated he had asked for substitutions, but not received them. Resident #157 stated he asked for a meal substitution because he was hungry. He stated they always brought a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, and that gets old. During an observation on 9/13/21, at 1:35 p.m., Resident #113, was observed to refuse his lunch tray. Staff did not offer something else…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-21 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide therapeutic diets to two residents on Renal diet (Resident 23 and 36). This failure could result to residents not receiving proper nutrition needed. Findings: During a concurrent observation and record review on 9/13/21, at 11:36 a.m., Resident 23's lunch tray was observed with one whole banana. Tray ticket was reviewed and indicated, 80 GM Renal BANANA 1-each. During an interview on 9/15/21, at 4:51 p.m., RD was asked about the banana served for the renal diet resident. RD stated, it was a lapse in judgement. RD stated staff knew not to serve banana to renal diet residents. RD further stated, she did not have enough time to train Dietary Staff Y who prepared the trays for lunch. During an observation and interview on 9/14/21, at 12:48 p.m., Resident #36's lunch observation indicated One roll, mashed potatoes covered in gravy, meat covered in gravy, mixed vegetables, and peaches with what appeared to be grease spots hardened around…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-21 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow Policy and Procedure (P&P) for the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, when they did not communicate QAPI initiatives, or seek input from staff, residents, and family members. This failure had the potential for the QAPI Committee to miss valuable feedback from the residents, family members and staff who provide direct resident care. Findings: During an observation on 9/13/21, at 11 a.m., a communication board behind glass indicated Quality Advancement and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee Components. No current projects were listed. A copy of the QAPI plan dated 2019 was observed. During an interview on 9/14/21, at 11:45 a.m., Licensed Staff E and Unlicensed Staff X stated they had not been asked for feedback or input about resident care issues and did not know what QAPI was. During an interview on 9/16/21, at 3:44 p.m., the Medical Director stated he attended the monthly QAPI. He indicated the committee reviewed Policy and Procedures (P&P), Infection Prevention and COVID data every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify responsible party and the physician for one resident (Resident 53) of a significant weight loss. This failure resulted in significant weight loss not monitored and addressed. Findings: A review of Resident 53's weights record dated 7/8/21 to 9/13/21 indicated, recorded weight of 175 lbs (pounds) on 7/11/21 and weight of 165 lbs on 8/22/21. Resident 53 had a significant weight loss of 5.71% in 30 days. A review of Resident 53's progress notes dated 8/22/21 to 9/14/21, did not indicate notification of significant weight loss to responsible party and the physician. Progress notes did not indicate Registered Dietician's (RD) documentation about the significant weight loss. Progress notes indicated Resident 53 had four IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) meetings from 8/23/21 to 8/30/21. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/15/21, at 1:18 p.m., Resident 53's progress notes from 8/22/21 to 9/14/21 were reviewed with Licensed Staff E. Licensed Staff E was asked about the process if resident had weight loss.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-21 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 60) when a Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool completed by clinical staff to assess a resident's cognitive, psychological, physical, and functional capabilities) was not completed within 14 days of Resident 60's admission to hospice care. This failure resulted in an inaccurate representation of Resident 60's current clinical status and had the potential to cause inadequate care based on a delinquent comprehensive assessment and care planning. Findings: During a clinical record review for Resident 60, the Physician's Order dated 03/09/21 indicated an order for hospice referral due to Cerebral Infarction (stroke). During a clinical record review for Resident 60, the Progress Note dated 03/12/21 indicated, Resident 60 was admitted to Hospice Services. During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 60's MDS with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 09/17/21 at 11:25 a.m., the MDS indicated a Significant Change in Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document an MDS assessments for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 60). This failure resulted to inaccurate reflection of resident status and incomplete comprehensive care plans to meet Resident 60's needs. Findings: 1. Significant Change in Status Assessment (2/11/21) During a clinical record review for Resident 60, the Dental Progress Note dated 1/21/2021, indicated Resident 60 had three broken/ decayed teeth and had Periodontal Disease (a gum infection that is ongoing). During a clinical record review for Resident 60's MDS Significant Change in Status assessment dated [DATE], Section L0200 (Dental and Oral Status) indicated Resident 60 had no obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. 2. Quarterly Assessment (5/5/21) a. During a clinical record review for Resident 60, the Progress Note dated 3/12/21 indicated Resident 60 was admitted to Hospice Services. During a clinical record review for Resident 60's MDS Quarterly assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's policy and procedure to ensure a PASARR (Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) was completed for one of 10 sampled residents (Resident 66). This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for not receiving the appropriate mental health care to meet their needs. Findings: During a record review of Resident 66's chart on 9/13/21 at 2:00 p.m., no PASARR form was found in the medical record. During an interview with Medical Records Manager on 9/14/21 at 10:30 a.m., when asked where PASARR forms were kept, he stated they were kept in the Matrix (Electronic Medical Record). During a record review on 9/14/21 at 11:00 a.m., there was no PASARR form found for Resident 66 in the Matrix. During an interview with Licensed Staff A on 9/15/21 at 2:21 p.m., when asked for Resident 66's PASARR, Licensed Staff A looked into the medical record and stated there was no PASARR found for Resident 66. Licensed Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to communicate the recommendations of the restorative nursing assistants (RNA, provide rehabilitation care to help people regain or improve their physical, mental and emotional health) to the rehabilitation (rehab) department for one of six residents (Resident 91) sampled for ADL (activities of daily living) decline. This failure could potentially result in a decline in mobility, loss of independence, depression, and could cause Resident 91 to give up. Findings: During an observation and interview on 9/13/21 at 4:21 p.m., Resident 91 stated the staff were not trained in rehabilitation. Resident 91 stated staff did not seem to understand that she was numb on her left side, which was paralyzed. Resident 91 stated that during transfers (such as from bed to chair) she did most of the work herself. She stated that a few weeks ago, she pulled a muscle in her shoulder when a staff member helped her during a transfer. Resident 91 stated that she lost her balance due to a miscommunication with the staff member, and when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to meet the nutritional needs of one resident (Resident 53) with feeding tube (medical device used to provide liquid nourishment, fluids and medications by bypassing oral intake). This failure resulted in Resident 53 having significant weight loss in 30 days. Findings: A review of Resident 53's weights record dated 7/8/21 to 9/13/21 indicated, recorded weight of 175 lbs (pounds) on 7/11/21 and weight of 165 lbs on 8/22/21. Resident 53 had a significant weight loss of 5.71% in 30 days. A review of Resident 53's Physician Order Report dated 7/19/21, it indicated, Monitor Intake and Output (I & O) every shift; NOC (night), AM, PM. During an interview on 9/16/21, at 2:06 p.m., Licensed Staff L was asked if they were monitoring and documenting Resident 53's tube feeding. Licensed Staff L stated she got the total amount of feeding formula consumed during her shift and the total of fluids provided and documented it at the end of her shift. During an interview on 9/16/21, at 3:17 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services according to resident needs and professional standard of practice to one resident (Resident 53) with a feeding tube (medical device used to provide liquid nourishment, fluids and medications by bypassing oral intake). This failure resulted in: 1. Water flushing order not followed 2. Possible aspiration pneumonia Findings: 1. During an observation on 9/15/21, at 2:46 p.m., Resident 53 was observed with feeding tube Diabetisource (formula) running at a rate of 85 ml (milliliters) per hour with 100 ml flushing every eight hours. Review of Resident 53's Physician Order Report dated 9/1/21 to 9/16/21, it indicated, Diabetisource @ 85 ml/hr x 20 hours via PEG-Tube (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy-tube placed directly into the stomach for administration of food, fluids and medications) Special Instruction: ON at 2:00 PM; OFF at 10:00 AM. Physician order report with start date 9/14/21 indicated, Enteral-Free Water Flush 150 ml TID Three Times a Day. During an observation on 9/16/21, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and Administrator interview the facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan. Failure to assess areas of patient care priorities resulted in the facility's inability to self-identify areas for improvement. Findings: The concept of developing QAPI plans is for facility self-identification and correction of quality deficiencies. In addition to identification and correcting quality deficiencies it provides opportunities for improvement, which will lead to improvement in the lives of nursing home residents, through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety (Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services, State Operations Manual Transmittal 169). The annual recertification survey from 9/20/21 - 9/21/21 revealed deficient practices related to the safe and effective implementation of food services (Cross Reference F801, F802, F803, F 806, F 808, F812, F692), Covid Monitoring (Cross Reference F880), PASARR Screening (Cross Reference F645), Activities of Daily Living Decline (Cross…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based interview and record review, the facility failed to re-check blood sugars and notify the physician/nurse practitioner, as ordered, of blood sugar levels greater than 450 for one of two sampled residents (Resident (R) 58), who were reviewed for insulin concerns. The facility identified 24 residents with physician orders for finger stick blood sugar level checks and 12 residents with physician orders for sliding scale insulin. Findings Include: The facility's policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated 05/2017, indicated, . Our facility shall notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status . The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has been a(an) . specific instruction to notify the Physician of changes in the resident's condition . The nurse will record in the resident's medical record information relative to changes in the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist identified, and acted upon, irregularities for the use of an antipsychotic medication (Haldol decanoate) for one resident (Resident (R) 51), out of a survey sample of five residents and one expanded resident sample reviewed. Findings Include: Review of R51's, Resident Face Sheet, indicated the facility admitted Resident 51 on 03/19/13. Review of, Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber, dated 12/06/18, with a hand-written noted that a telephone order was obtained to have R51 seen by psych services to address her current use of Haldol. This note came from the Consultant Pharmacist. Review of a nursing, Resident Progress Note, dated 12/06/18, indicated a referral was obtained to have R51 evaluated by behavioral health services for medication management and treatment of early onset Alzheimer's disease. Review of a document titled, .Behavioral. dated 12/10/18, indicated R51 was seen by an Advance Practice Registered Nurse (APRN), and the APRN recommended Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents, (Resident (R) 51), had appropriate clinical indications for the continued use of an antipsychotic medication (Haldol decanoate), out of a survey sample of five and one expanded resident sample for unnecessary medications. (Cross Reference F756) Findings include: Review of R51's, Resident Face Sheet, indicated the facility admitted Resident 51 on 03/19/13, with a diagnosis of early onset Alzheimer's disease. Review of, Consents-Facility Verification of Informed Consent-Psychotropic Drug, dated 03/09/16, indicated Resident 51's representative was informed R51 was administered Haldol decanoate 25 milligrams (mg) intramuscular (IM), scheduled one time a month for behavioral or psychological symptoms of dementia. Review of, Consents-Facility Verification of Informed Consent-Psychotropic Drug, dated 08/29/18, indicated R51's resident representative was informed the use of Haldol decanoate 12.5 mg IM was for the treatment of random outbursts and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$30,259 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $30,259 — penalty dated 2023-09-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HUDSON RIVER OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/05/2021
BAY BRIDGE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/05/2021
SERRANO, NOELIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/11/2023
HADLEY, SPENCERIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/05/2021
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$23.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+12.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 3%Medicare 18%Other / private 79%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$456per resident / day
operating cost
$13,859per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$523per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555161. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next