No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Crystal Cove Care Center

1445 Superior Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92663 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 96 certified beds · (949) 515-3930 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (949) 515-3930 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Jun 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (81) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
361 Hospital Rd · (949) 515-7861 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rx Experts<0.1 mi
351 Hospital Rd · (844) 799-7378 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Park
401 Old Newport Blvd · (949) 722-2300 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.5%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%4.0%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.4%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.5%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.6%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.4%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%4.3%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.6%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.4%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.9%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.1%11.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.462.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.791.571.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 400 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
54.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.98U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.53hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.40hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 54.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.98 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.3%CMS range 57.5–66.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 8.4–13.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge54.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge44.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.5%CMS range 7.4–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.471.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
1.15
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.16
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.89
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
50.4%
Total nursing turnover
41.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 89.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-24)
26
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

81 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 71 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an abuse allegation for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 105). * Resident 105 reported a night shift staff came to the resident and made the resident feel uncomfortable, to the Case Manager. Resident 105 further reported the night nurse was unpleasant and was rude, to the ADON. This failure placed the resident at risk for potential ongoing abuse, delayed thorough investigation and potential lack of protection of the resident and other residents from potential abuse.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated 2001 showed the residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 98) was followed and revised. * Resident 98's interventions for keeping the bed in a low position was not followed. * Resident 98's plan of care was not revised to show interventions for Resident 98 raising the bed on her own, per staff. These failures posed the risk of not providing appropriate care for Resident 98.Findings: On 6/17/26 at 0802 hours, Resident 98 was observed sitting up in her bed awake with her bed approximately one and one half feet above the floor. On 6/17/26 at 0835 hours, Resident 98 was observed in bed with her bed approximately one and one-half feet above the floor. On 6/17/26 at 0900 hours, Resident 98 was observed in bed, awake with her bed approximately one and one-half feet above the floor. On 6/17/26 at 1217 hours, an observation of Resident 98 and concurrent interview was conducted with CNA 3. Resident 98 was observed in bed awake…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three final sampled residents (Resident 98) reviewed for accident hazards remained free of accidents. * Resident 98's bed was not kept in a low position. This failure posed the risk of Resident 98 suffering serious injuries from any future falls.Findings: On 6/17/26 at 0802 hours, Resident 98 was observed sitting up in her bed awake with her bed approximately one and one half feet above the floor. On 6/17/26 at 0835 hours, Resident 98 was observed in bed with her bed approximately one and one-half feet above the floor. On 6/17/26 at 0900 hours, Resident 98 was observed in bed, awake with her bed approximately one and one-half feet above the floor. On 6/17/26 at 1217 hours, an observation of Resident 98 and concurrent interview was conducted with CNA 3. Resident 98 was observed in bed awake with her bed approximately one and three quarters feet above the floor. CNA 3 was summoned to Resident 98's room for an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the infection control practices designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections. * RN 1 and LVN 2 failed to wear a gown during the wound care treatment for Resident 3, who had a Stage 3 pressure injury (a full-thickness skin loss where fat tissue is visible, but the bone, tendon, or muscle are not exposed). In addition, there was no EBP signage near the resident's room doorway or bedside to alert the facility staff and/or visitors of the precautions. These failures posed the risk of potential for cross-contamination and spread of infectious organisms in the facility.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 2001 showed the Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) are utilized to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms to residents. The Policy Interpretation and Implementation showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate pain management for three of three sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3). * The facility failed to accurately document the monitoring of pain levels for Residents 1, 2, and 3 and administer the pain medications according to the physician's orders. This failure had the potential to put Residents 1, 2, and 3 at risk for ineffective pain management.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Pain Assessment and Management dated 2001 showed the purpose of this procedure are to help the staff identify pain in the resident, develop interventions consistent with the resident's goals and needs, and address the underlying causes of pain. The Assessing Pain section showed to assess pain using a consistent approach and a standardized pain instrument appropriate to the resident's cognition level. Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications dated 2001 showed the medications are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to ensure the proper interventions were implemented when Resident 1 did not have a BM for more than three days. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Bowel Regimen Management (undated) showed to ensure all the residents in the skilled nursing facility maintain the optimal bowel function through individualized, evidence-based bowel management programs that promote comfort, dignity, and prevent constipation, impaction, or incontinence. The facility shall assess, monitor, and manage each resident's bowel function. The nursing staff shall review the bowel records daily and monitor for no bowel movement for more than or 72 hours, for signs of discomfort, abdominal distention (visible enlargement of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the information regarding the rights to formulate the advance directives and/or failed to obtain and maintain the copies of advance directives for two of 22 final sampled residents (Residents 10 and 586). These failures had the potential for the residents' decisions regarding their healthcare and treatment options not being honored. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Advance Directives (undated) showed the following: - Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the SSD or designee inquire of the resident, his/ her family members and/ or his or her legal representative, about the existence of any written advance directives; - The resident or representative is provided with the written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so; - If the resident or representative indicates that he or she has not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure two of 22 final sampled residents (Residents 45 and 336) attained and maintained their highest practicable physical well-being. * The facility failed to monitor Resident 336's pacemaker. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident 336's skin assessments were accurate and complete. Furthermore, the facility failed to monitor Resident 336 after the removal of the staples on her back, obtain the physician's order before applying the Steri-Strips to Resident 336's surgical site, and develop a plan of care to monitor the surgical site and address the removal of the staples. * The facility failed to ensure the laboratory tests for CBC, Chem 7 blood panel and magnesium level ordered for Resident 45 were completed. In addition, the facility failed to monitor Resident 45's orthostatic blood pressure correctly. These failures had the potential to cause a delay in providing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to prevent the development of pressure injuries for one of two final sampled residents reviewed for high risk of developing pressure injuries (Resident 40). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 40's turning and repositioning interventions were implemented to prevent the development of the pressure injuries. This failure had the potential for the resident to develop pressure injuries or worsening of the existing pressure injuries. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Repositioning (undated) showed the repositioning is the common, effective intervention for preventing skin breakdown, promoting circulation, and providing pressure relief. Residents who are in the chair should be on an every one hour repositioning schedule. Review of the facility's P&P titled Prevention of Pressure Injuries (undated) showed the following: - The nursing staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to monitor the fluid intake for one of one final sampled resident (Resident 45) reviewed for hydration status. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 45's fluid intake from the dietary department and the total daily fluid intake were monitored. This failure had the potential for Resident 45 to have fluid overload, which had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Encouraging and Restricting Fluids dated 2001 showed the Restricting Fluids section includes the following: - Remove the resident's water pitcher and cup from the room; - Take the fluid container to the resident's room; - Encourage the resident to drink the fluid. Should the resident refuse, report such information to your supervisor; - Record the amount of fluid consumed on the intake side of the intake and output record. Record fluid intake in ml; and - Remove fluid container. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 71 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services for three of three final sampled residents (Residents 67, 336, and 686) reviewed for the respiratory care. * The facility failed to obtain a physician's order prior to the oxygen administration for Resident 686. * The facility failed to obtain a physician's order prior to the oxygen administration for Resident 336. The facility failed to place an Oxygen In Use sign outside the door of Resident 336's room as per the facility's P&P. In addition, the facility failed to develop a care plan problem to address Resident 336's oxygen use. Furthermore, the facility failed to administer oxygen as per the physician's order to Resident 336. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 67's nebulizer tubing was labeled with Resident 67's name and the date. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the dialysis care was provided for one of two final sampled residents (Resident 70) reviewed for dialysis as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure the dialysis emergency kit was maintained at the bedside for Resident 70. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident 70's dialysis access site was assessed and monitored appropriately and consistently. The licensed staff failed to consistently assess Resident 70's dialysis access site prior to the resident being transported to the dialysis treatment center and upon returning from the dialysis center. In addition, the licensed staff documented Resident 70's dialysis access type as either catheter or left blank, instead of permacath. These failures had the potential for Resident 70 not being provided with the appropriate care and treatment, which could lead to medical complications related to the resident's dialysis access site. Findings:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the competency of two of two licensed nurses (LVN 12 and the ADON) interviewed regarding bladder training and failed to ensure the annual performance evaluation was conducted for one of three licensed nurses (LVN 5) reviewed for the annual performance evaluation. * The facility failed to ensure LVN 12 and the ADON were able to demonstrate their competency on the bladder training for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. * The facility failed to provide the training materials used for the in-service trainings provided to the facility staff. * The facility failed to ensure the annual performance evaluation was completed for LVN 5. These failures had the potential to put the residents at risk for care not being provided in a safe and competent manner. 1. According to [NAME] and Wilkins' article titled Reducing CAUTIs with a Bladder Retraining Program dated 2013 showed the bladder retraining with a catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five final sampled residents (Resident 67) reviewed for unnecessary drugs were free from unnessary drugs. * Resident 67 had duplicate medication orders with different dosages. This failure posed the risk of medication errors. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 67 was conducted on 2/19/25. Resident 67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 67's H&P examination dated 3/28/24, showed Resident 67 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 67's Order Summary Report showed the following physician's orders: - dated 8/16/24, to administer guaifenesin oral tablet 400 mg PO every six hours as needed for cough and congestion. - dated 1/2/25, to administer geri-tussin (a brand of cough and cold medicine that contains guaifenesin, an expectorant and helps relieve cough, chest congestion, and stuffy nose) oral liquid 100 mg/5 ml 10 ml PO every six hours as needed for cough…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five final sampled residents (Residents 1 and 336) reviewed for unnecessary medications was free from the unnecessary psychotropic medication. * The facility failed to ensure the informed consent for zolpidem (hypnotic medication) was signed by the physician. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the monitoring for hours of sleep related to the use of zolpidem matched the documentation of the episode when Resident 336 was unable to sleep. * The facility failed to ensure the informed consent for Resident 1's clonazepam (antianxiety medication) medication was renewed and the consent was obtained from the responsible party and signed by the physician. These failures had to potential to result in unnecessary use and ineffective monitoring for the use of psychotropic medication that could negatively affect Resident 336's well-being. Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 336 was initiated on 2/18/25. Resident 336 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medications were stored safely, securely and properly labeled. * The facility failed to ensure the single use dressings and discontinued topical medication were removed and discarded from the treatment cart. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure the treatment cart was clean. * The facility failed to ensure the expired Covid testing kits were discarded. * The facility failed to ensure a medication with white pasty cream and a bottle of Adapt stoma powder (powder used to absorb moisture from broken skin around the stoma, which allows for better barrier adhesion to help protect the skin) were not kept at Resident 54's bedside. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' wellbeing. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication, Labeling and Storage (undated) showed the facility stores all the drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. 1. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils were clean and free of food particle or residue. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensil was in good condition. These failures had the potential for cross contamination and foodborne illnesses to the residents consuming the foods prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's Diet Type Report dated 2/18/25, showed 80 of 86 residents consumed the foods prepared in the kitchen. 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Dishwashing dated 2023 showed all the dishes will be properly sanitized through the dishwasher. The dishwasher will be kept clean and in good working order. Gross food particles shall be removed by careful scraping and pre-rinsing in running water. According to the USDA Food Code 2022, 4-601.11 Equipment, Food - Contact Surfaces, Nonfood Contact Surface, and Utensils, the equipment food-contact surfaces and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 7. Medical record review for Resident 336 was initiated on 2/18/25. Resident 336 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 336's POLST dated 2/14/25, showed a different resident name and the wrong birthdate. Review of Resident 336's Informed Consent - Immunization (Updated) - V2 dated 2/14/25, for influenza vaccine, showed a different resident name. Review of Resident 336's Informed Consent - Immunization (Updated) - V2 dated 2/14/25, for pneumonia vaccine, showed a different resident name. Review of Resident 336's Informed Consent - Immunization (Updated) - V2 dated 2/14/25, for Covid-19 vaccine, showed a different resident name. Review of Resident 336's Consent to Treat dated 2/14/25 showed a different resident name. On 2/21/25 at 1338 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review for Resident 336 was conducted with RN 4. RN 4 verified the above findings. 10. Medical record review for Resident 26 was initiated on 2/19/25. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the infection control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections. * The facility failed to implement their infection control surveillance program for November 2024, December 2024, and January 2025. The facility failed to correctly identify the HAIs and CAIs. The facility failed to conduct an accurate infection surveillance as per the McGeer criteria. The facility failed to ensure the residents infections were mapped and tracked. In addtion, the facility failed to ensure the infection control data presented to the infection control meeting was accurate and complete. * The facility failed to ensure the clean personal clothing and linen cart were covered during transportation. * The facility failed to ensure LVN 10 had performed hand hygiene while providing a wound care treatment to Resident 336. * The facility failed to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate care and services to prevent UTIs for one of three final sampled residents (Resident 336) reviewed for the use of indwelling urinary catheter. * The facility failed to ensure the indwelling urinary catheter care was provided to Resident 336. In addition, the facility failed to monitor Resident 336's urinary output as per the resident's plan of care and provide the bladder training for Resident 336. These failures posed the risk for Resident 336 to develop CAUTI and negatively impact Resident 336's well-being. Findings: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's article (undated) titled Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection showed a UTI is an infection in the urinary tract system (including the bladder and the kidneys). Germs can travel along the catheter, and if they enter the urinary tract, may cause an infection in the bladder or kidneys. Prevention of the CAUTIs include proper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to implement Resident 1's care plan for the use of dental appliances (dentures) during meals and for the coordination of a dental consult, to assist Resident 1 with obtaining lower dentures, after his readmission to the facility. * The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address Resident 1's hard of hearing status. These failures placed the resident at risk of not being provided appropriate, consistent, and individualized care. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans Comprehensive Person Center (undated) showed a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for the resident should be developed by the interdisciplinary team with the input from the resident and his family or legal representative. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide dental services to meet the needs of one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to assist Resident 1 with obtaining the lower dentures since his readmission to the facility. * The facility had failed to conduct a loss or theft investigation specific to Resident 1's lower dentures and failed to coordinate a dental consult for Resident 1. These failures had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Dental Services (undated) showed the routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the resident's oral health needs in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. The social services representatives will assist the residents with the appointments, transportation arrangements, and reimbursement of the dental services under the State plan if eligible. The dentures will be protected from loss or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and treatment related to oxygen administration for one of three final sampled residents (Resident 2). * The facility failed to administer the oxygen to Resident 2 as ordered by the physician. This failure posed the risk of the resident developing complications due to inadequate oxygen therapy. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 12/5/23. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's History and Physical examination dated 12/4/23, showed Resident 2 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. Resident 2 had the left and right upper lungs embolism (a condition in which one or more arteries in the lungs become blocked by a blood clot). Review of Resident 2's admission diagnosis list dated 12/1/23, showed COPD, obstructive sleep apnea (noncontinuous airflow blockage during sleep), and acute and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the Order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the home health services were in place before the resident was discharged home from the facility for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2). * Resident 2 was discharged home with an order for home health services, which included registered nursing and physical therapy. However, the facility failed to ensure home health services were in place, prior to Resident 2 being discharged home. This failure posed the risk for an unsafe transition from the facility to the home setting. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Discharge Summary and Plan revised 10/2022 showed when a resident's discharge is anticipated, a discharge summary and post-discharge plan is developed to assist the resident with discharge. The post-discharge plan is developed by the care planning/interdisciplinary team, with the assistance of the resident and his or her family and includes: where the individual plans to reside and arrangements…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2). * The facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the use of an intermittent urinary catheter (in an attempt to obtain a urine specimen) for Resident 2. This failure posed the risk for the unnecessary use of a urinary catheter which had the potential for negative health outcomes. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2's abductor pillow was utilized properly. Resident 2 recently had undergone hip surgery. Resident 2's plan of care included the use of an abductor pillow, status post-surgery, while in bed. Resident 2 was observed lying in bed without the abductor pillow straps attached to Resident 2's legs. This had the potential for Resident 2's surgically repaired hip to move out of position and posed the risk for injury. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Catheterization Intermittent Female Resident Revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the pain assessment was conducted in accordance with the facility's P&P, after a resident complained of pain for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). * Resident 1 refused to undergo dialysis and claimed he was in pain. The facility failed to conduct a pain assessment specific to Resident 1's complaint of pain. This failure posed the risk to not identify, address, and treat Resident 1's underlying cause of pain, which posed the risk for negative health outcomes. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Pain Assessment and Management revised 10/2022 showed identifying the causes of pain (included) review of the resident's clinical record to identify conditions or situations that may predispose the resident to pain. During the pain assessment gather the following information: location of pain, characteristics of pain, intensity of pain, pattern of pain, and frequency of pain. Upon completion of the pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from significant medication errors. * Resident 1's written order for clonidine was incorrectly entered into Resident 1's electronic medical record. As a result, Resident 1 did not receive 34 doses of clonidine as ordered. This failure posed the risk for negative health outcomes for Resident 1. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised 4/2019, showed medications are to be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Medications are administered in accordance with prescribed orders. Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 10/24/23. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's physician's orders, showed an order dated 7/26/22, for clonidine (antihypertensive medication) 0.3 mg 3 tablets orally twice a day (0900 & 1700 hours) routinely. Review of Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure a laboratory test was performed as ordered by the physician, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). * Resident 1's physician ordered a lipase (enzyme secreted by the pancreas) level; however, the facility failed to perform the laboratory test. This failure had the potential for a delay in necessary treatment and services for Resident 1. Findings: Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 10/24/23. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's SBAR Summary for Providers dated 10/9/22 0830 hours, showed Resident 1 had a change in condition. Resident 1 was noted with complaints of nausea and vomiting, with an episode of a small amount of emesis. Resident 1's physician was notified and ordered laboratory tests (which included a lipase level). Review of Resident 1's physician's order dated 10/9/22, showed an order to obtain a lipase level. Review of Resident 1's medical record failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was accurate for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). * Resident 1 had an abdominal ultrasound performed on 10/9/22;however, the licensed nurse documented Resident 1 had a KUB performed on 10/9/22. This failure had the potential for the resident's care needs not being met as the medical information was inaccurate. Findings: Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 10/24/23. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report showed an order dated 10/9/22, for an abdominal ultrasound to be performed. Review of Resident 1's Alert Charting dated 10/9/22 1432 hours, showed LVN 2 documented Resident 1 had a KUB done at this time with results pending. On 11/6/23 at 1125 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with the DON. The DON was asked if Resident 1 had an abdominal ultrasound or a KUB performed on 10/9/22. The DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure proper labeling and dating of opened food items in the refrigerator. * The facility failed to ensure the bin containing kitchen utensils was clean. * The facility failed to ensure the handles of the ladles were not melted. * The facility failed to ensure turkey baster was clean. * The facility failed to ensure plate warmer was clean. * The facility failed to ensure the glaze on the handles of the adaptive utensils (specialized forks, spoons with built-up handles to help people with disabilities to dine independently) was not worn off. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumes food prepared from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the CMS 672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents completed by the facility on 8/15/23, showed 76 of 87 residents in the facility received food prepared in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement their infection control surveillance program in accordance with the facility's P&P and failed to maintain the infection practices to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection. * The facility failed to maintain an accurate infection surveillance program for April, May, and July 2023 when: - the facility failed to ensure an Infection Prevention and Surveillance Log was completed for April 2023. - the facility failed to ensure a summarized Monthly Infection Control Surveillance was completed for May 2023. - the facility failed to ensure all McGeer's Criteria were completed for July 2023. - the facility failed to ensure McGeer's Criteria had accurate information regarding infection surveillance for two of 20 final sampled residents (Residents 14 and 488). * The facility failed to ensure the infection control practices were implemented in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, facility document, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the antibiotic stewardship program. The facility failed to ensure two of 20 final sampled residents (Residents 14 and 488) were accurately and timely reviewed for the appropriate use of antibiotics. This failure had the potential for inappropriate use and increased risk of drug resistant organisms. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Infection Prevention and Control Program revised 10/2018, under Section Antibiotic Stewardship Program, showed the following: a. Culture reports, sensitivity data, and antibiotic usage reviews are included in surveillance activity. b. Medical criteria and standardized definitions of infections are used to recognize and manage infections. c. Antibiotics usage is evaluated, and practitioners are provided feedback on reviews. 1. Review of the Infection Prevention and Control Surveillance Log for July 2023 showed Resident 14 was on an Bactrim 800 mg (an antibiotic medication) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the essential equipment used to prepare, serve, and store food in the facility. * The facility failed to ensure Freezer #1 was functioning properly to maintain the required temperature of 0 degrees F or lower. * The facility failed to ensure the ice machine was not leaking. * The facility failed to ensure the microwave used to warm the residents' foods was free from rust. These failures had the potential for equipment not functioning in the way they were intended and in turn cause contamination of food, leading to food-borne illnesses for the residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the CMS 672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents completed by the facility on 8/15/23, showed 76 of 87 residents in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. Review of the USDA Food Code 2022, Section 4-501.11, Good Repair and Proper Adjustment showed equipment shall be maintained in a state of repair and condition. 1. During the initial observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, medical record, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the staff provided care and promoted dignity and respect for one nonsampled resident (Resident 3). * CNA 1 was observed standing over Resident 3 while assisting the resident with meals. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Dignity revised 2/2021 showed when assisting with care, residents are supported in exercising their rights. For example, residents are provided with a dignified dining experience. On 8/15/23 at 1206 hours, during the initial dining observation in the dining room, CNA 1 was observed standing over Resident 3 while assisting the resident to eat. Several chairs were observed in the dining room. On 8/15/23 at 1300 hours, an interview was conducted with CNA 1. CNA 1 stated he was only cuing Resident 3 to eat, however, CNA 1 was informed he was observed standing over to feed Resident 3. CNA 1 acknowledged he was feeding Resident 3. CNA 1 stated he was supposed to get a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 20 final sampled residents (Resident 13) was given the opportunity to participate in the care plan conferences. This had the potential for Resident 13 to not be able to choose treatments options and make decisions in care planning. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised March 2022 showed each resident has the right, individually or through a responsible party, to participate in the development and implantation of his or her comprehensive person-centered care plan including the right to participate in the planning process, suggests some possible individual goals and approaches, request meetings, and participate in suggesting the type, amount, frequency, and duration of care. The resident should be informed of the date of his or her care planning conference(s) and given the opportunity to participate. During the interview on 8/15/23 at 0919 hours,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the personal belongings were returned timely during and after discharge for one of 20 final sampled residents (Resident 441). * Resident 441's personal medications (a bottle of multivitamins and a bottle of vitamin D) were not returned timely by the facility during discharge and after discharge. This had the potential for Resident 441's personal belongings being lost. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medications Brought to the Facility by the Resident/Family revised April 2017 showed the medications brought into the facility that are not approved for the resident's use shall be returned to the family. If the family does not pick up those medications within the 30 days, the facility may destroy them in accordance with established policies. On 8/10/23 at 0948 hours, a telephone interview was conducted with Resident 441. Resident 441 stated she was discharge from the facility on 7/27/23.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to obtain and maintain the copies of advance directives (legal document that states a person's wishes about receiving medical care if that person is no longer able to make medical decisions) and failed to provide the information regarding the rights to formulate the advance directives for three of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 48, 72, and 539). These failures had the potential for the residents' decisions regarding their healthcare and treatment options not being honored. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Advance Directives (undated) showed the following: - Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the SSD or designee inquire of the resident, his/ her family members and/ or his or her legal representative, about the existence of any written advance directives - If the resident or the resident's representative has executed one or more advance directive(s), or executes one upon admission, copies of these…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the information on how to file a grievance was provided to one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 72) and four nonsampled residents (Resident 7, 11, 41, and 60) participated in the Resident Council and failed to ensure the residents' grievances were resolved by the facility. These failures had the potential to cause the residents feeling hopeless and may negatively affect their emotional well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Grievances/Complaints, Filing (undated) showed the residents have the right to file a grievances either orally or in writing to the facility staff or the agency designated to hear the grievances. Upon admission, the residents are provided with written information on how to file a grievance or complaint. A copy of the grievance/complaint procedure will be posted on the residents bulletin board. Review of the facility's monthly Resident Council…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident-to-resident altercation between one of 20 final sampled residents (Resident 13) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 50) to the CDPH L&C and LTC Ombudsman Programs as per the facility's P&P. This failure had the potential for the residents to be vulnerable for further abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident-to-Resident Altercations revised September 2022 showed the facility staff will monitor residents for aggressive/inappropriate behavior towards other residents, family members, visitors, or to the staff. Occurrences of such incidents are promptly reported to the nurse supervisor, DON, and Administrator. The Administrator will report the incident in accordance with the criteria established under Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating. If two residents are involved in an altercation, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the physician and resident's representative were notified, changes in the care plan approaches were completed, and continued monitoring was performed for one of 20 final sampled residents (Resident 13) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 50) for an allegation of resident-to-resident altercation as per the facility's P&P. * Resident 13 claimed he was allegedly punched in the face seven times by Resident 50. This failure had the potential for further resident abuse to occur and put other residents at risk for abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident-to-Resident Altercations revised September 2022 showed the facility staff monitor the residents for aggressive/inappropriate behavior towards other residents, family members, visitors, or to the staff. Occurrences of such incidents are promptly reported to the nurse supervisor, director of nursing services, and to the administrator. The Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 20 final sampled residents (Residents 8 and 13) received the accurate MDS assessments. * Resident 13 stated he was legally blind, unable to read fine prints, and was not on a physician's prescribed weight gain regimen. However, the MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 13 had adequate vision and was on physician prescribed weight gain. * Resident 8's Annual MDS failed to accurately reflect the resident's fall with major injury. These failures had the potential of not meeting the residents' care needs. Findings: According to the Long-Term Care Facility Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1, October 2019, Chapter One, it is important to note here that information obtained should cover the same observation period as specified by the MDS items on the assessment and should be validated for accuracy (what the resident's actual status was during that observation period) by the IDT completing the assessment. As…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive plan of care for one of 20 final sampled residents (Resident 8) was revised to reflect the resident's current care needs and interventions. * Resident 8's plan of care showed a care plan problem dated 4/22/22, addressing Resident 8's at risk for falls and use of the bilateral floor mats as one of the interventions. The physician ordered to discontinue the bilateral floor mats on 7/15/22. Resident 8's care plan was not revised to reflect the physician's order dated 7/15/22, to discontinue the bilateral floor mats. This failure posed the risk of not providing Resident 8 with an individualized and person-centered care. Findings: On 8/15/23 at 0853 hours, 8/16/23 at 1446 hours, and 8/18/23 at 0809, 0836, and 1011 hours, Resident 8 was observed in bed, without the bilateral floor mats. Medical record review for Resident 8 was initiated on 8/15/23. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure two of 20 final sampled residents (Residents 34 and 48) attained and maintained their highest practicable well-being. * The facility failed to coordinate the care of Resident 48 with the contracted hospice. The hospice calendar and the sign-in/out forms did not show skilled nursing and CHHA visits provided as per the physician's orders. In addition, the medication profile list, nursing clinical notes, and hospice aide notes were not updated. Furthermore, a hospice packet containing the Continuous Care Note, Continuous Care Documentation, Continuous Care Initiation Sheet, Hospice Aide Care Plan/Note, Plan of Care, Pain Inventory Scale, and Medication List were blank. These failures had the potential for Resident 48 to not receive appropriate care and treatment for hospice services. * The facility failed to ensure the injection sites for insulin administration were rotated for Resident 34. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to prevent accidents for one of 20 final sampled residents (Resident 8). * The CNA improperly turned Resident 8 to her left side while in bed during incontinence care, and Resident 8 fell off the bed. As a result, Resident 8 sustained a fracture to the right humerus. * The facility failed to ensure the recommendation to apply the ice pack to the right shoulder area from Resident 8's orthopedic appointment was verified and followed. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 8 was initiated on 8/15/23. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (area of necrotic tissue in the brain) affecting left non-dominant side. a. Review of Resident 8's MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 8 had a moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assist from one person for bed mobility. Review of the eInteract Change of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the safe respiratory care for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 17). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 17's C-PAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine was cleaned as per the manufacturer's user cleaning guidelines. This failure had the potential to adversely affect the health and well-being Resident 17 and posed the risk for equipment contamination and respiratory complications. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled CPAP/BiPAP Support dated 3/2015 showed specific cleaning instruction guidelines are obtained from the manufacturer of the PAP device. The components of the machine such as the masks, nasal pillows, tubing and headgear should be cleaned with a mild detergent daily and allow to airdry. On 8/18/23 at 0843 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 17. Resident 17 was observed in bed, had an oxygen tubing via nasal cannula with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the dialysis care was provided for one of 20 final sampled residents (Resident 34) as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure Resident 34's dialysis access site was assessed and monitored appropriately and consistently. The licensed staff failed to consistently assess Resident 34's dialysis access site prior to the resident being transported to the dialysis and upon return from the dialysis clinic. In addition, the licensed staff documented Resident 34's dialysis access type as AV fistula (arteriovenous fistula, created by connecting an artery and a vein directly), instead of AV Graft (arteriovenous graft shunt, created by inserting a synthetic tube between an artery and a vein). Furthermore, the licensed staff documented the presence of warmth/ color and edema of Resident 34's left AV Graft but did not notify the physician. These failures had the potential for Resident 34 not being provided with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the pharmaceutical services to ensure accurate reconciliation, administration, and disposal of medications as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure non-controlled medications were discarded by two licensed nurses. * The facility failed to ensure administration of the controlled medications for one of nonsampled (Resident 539) was accurately documented to ensure accurate reconciliation and to prevent the medication administration errors. These failures had the potential for medication administration error, inaccurate reconciliation, and drug diversion (illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drugs or their use for unintended purposes) of controlled medications. Findings: Review of the facility's P &P titled Disposal of Medications, Syringes and Needles, Hygeia LTC Pharmacy Policy and Procedures dated 2020 showed controlled substances shall be disposed of by the care center in the presence of appropriately titled professionals,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of 20 final sampled residents (Residents 28 and 66) were free from the unnecessary medications. * The facility failed to accurately document the monitoring for signs and symptoms of bleeding related to Resident 28's use of apixaban (anticoagulant medication used to prevent blood clots). * The facility failed to monitor Resident 28's orthostatic blood pressure (a form of low blood pressure that happens when standing after sitting or lying down) * The facility failed to ensure accurately documenting the monitoring of the side effects related to Resident 66's use of apixaban (anticoagulant medication used to prevent blood clots). These failures had the potential for residents to receive unnecessary medications and develop significant adverse effects, and risk for adverse effects from prolonged used of medication. Findings: 1. According to Lexicomp, apixaban is an anticoagulant and may increase the risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure three of 20 final sampled residents (Residents 8 and 34) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (any drug which affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior). * The facility failed to ensure the number of behavioral episodes related to the use of alprazolam was monitored per shift as per the physician's order. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure the monthly behavior summary related to the use of zolpidem was completed for July 2023 for Resident 34. * The facility failed to consistently monitor the behavior manifestation, and accurately document the monthly behavioral episodes related to the use of Trazodone for Resident 8. These failures had the potential for the residents to develop significant adverse effects from the psychotropic medications and had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychotropic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. * The facility's medication error rate was 6.67%. Two of three licensed nurses observed (LVNs 3 and 4) were found to have made errors during the medication administration observation. * LVN 3 failed to administer the correct medication as ordered by the physician for Resident 17. * LVN 4 failed to administer one medication as ordered by the physician for Resident 640. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the residents' health. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised 4/19 showed the individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. On 8/17/23 at 0830 hours, a medication administration observation for Resident 17 was conducted with LVN 3. LVN 3 prepared and administered the following medications to Resident 17: -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, medical records, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services to ensure proper storage, labeling, and disposal medications. * The facility failed to ensure an opened Aplisol Injection tuberculin purified protein derivative (aids in the diagnosis of tuberculosis) vial was labeled with opened date. * The facility failed to ensure the opened insulin vials from the insulin emergency kit was labeled with opened date and the insulin emergency kit was replaced. * The facility failed to ensure proper disposal of the expired Covid swab test supplies. * The facility failed to ensure an unopened pen of Insulin Lispro (fast acting insulin) was refrigerated. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being and had the potential for the medications to loss the stability and effectiveness. Findings: Review of the facility's P & P titled Medication Labeling and Storage revised February 2023 showed the following: - Medication vials that have been opened or accessed (needle punctured) are dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, facility P&P review, and manufacturer's instruction manual review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff had the appropriate skill set to safely perform the daily operation of the Food and Nutrition Services Department as evidenced by: * The Dietary Director/RD was unable to demonstrate the correct procedure of the thermometer calibration. This had the potential to lead to foodborne illnesses in a highly susceptible population of residents who received food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Thermometer Use and Calibration dated 2018 showed food thermometers are to be used properly and calibrated to ensure accurate temperature reading. Review of the facility's document titled Inservice: Checking Accuracy and Calibrating a Thermometer (undated) showed the following: - Food thermometers are to be checked for accuracy and calibrated, if needed, on a regular basis (a) each week, (b) when one is dropped, or (c)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed. * A chicken broth was used instead of water during the pureed bread preparation. This failure placed the residents receiving pureed diet at risk for not receiving the menu as planned. Findings: Review of the facility's Menu Planning dated 2018 showed the seasonal menus are provided with corresponding recipes. Menus are planned to meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines, physician's orders and, to the extent medically possible, in accordance with the most recent recommended dietary allowances of the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council National Academy of Sciences. Review of the facility's diet spreadsheet for Wednesday Cycle 3 2023 for 8/16/23, for lunch showed to serve garlic bread for pureed diet. Review of the Diet Type Report showed there were seven residents on pureed diet, with no restrictions to bread. Review of the recipe for Pureed Bread/Margarine showed to use white…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the food served was palatable. * The pureed bread was sticky in texture. * The garlic bread was chewy in texture. These failures had the potential to impact the residents' nutritional status. Findings: Review of the CMS 672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents completed by the facility on 8/15/23, showed 76 of 87 residents in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. Review of the Diet Type Report showed there were 63 residents on regular diet, with no restrictions to bread. Review of the Diet Type Report showed there were seven residents on pureed diet, with no restrictions to bread. Review of the facility's diet spreadsheet for Wednesday Cycle 3 2023 for 8/16/23, for lunch showed to serve garlic bread for regular diet, and pureed garlic bread for puree-level 4 diet. According to the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) showed level 4 - pureed foods are not sticky. It is important that pureed foods are not too sticky because this can cause the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the food preference was honored for one nonsampled resident (Resident 12). * Resident 12 disliked wheat bread but was served a ham sandwich with wheat bread on his lunch tray. This had the potential to negatively affect the resident's food intake and nutritional status. Findings: On 8/15/2023 at 1226 hours, Resident 12 was observed on his bed with a lunch tray in front of him. The plate consisted of pork chop with gravy, herbed rice, green beans and a ham sandwich with wheat bread. Resident 12 was observed not eating his lunch. When asked about his lunch, Resident 12 stated it tasted like garbage and he did not like wheat bread. Review of Resident 12's meal ticket (used to identify the resident's diet, allergies, and food preferences) showed Resident 12 disliked wheat bread. On 8/15/2023 at 1250 hours, an interview and concurrent review of Resident 12's lunch tray and tray ticket was conducted with CNA 3. CNA 3 verified Resident 12 was served a sandwich with wheat bread even though the meal ticket showed Resident 12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-06-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation requirements were met in the kitchen as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure meat was properly thawed using the sink thawing method. * The facility failed to ensure a proper sanitary condition of the ice machine. * The facility failed to ensure food preparation equipment was clean. * The facility failed to ensure that a wooden table used in the kitchen for food preparation was cleanable. * The facility failed to ensure a food blender was allowed to air dry. * The facility failed to ensure that kitchen equipment was clean. * The facility failed to replace a worn can opener blade with exposed metal. * The facility failed to replace cutting boards that were marred and did not have cleanable surfaces. * The facility failed to ensure food contact surfaces were smooth and cleanable. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in the 68 medically vulnerable residents who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the CMS 672 Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide safe respiratory care for two of 18 final sampled residents (Residents 9 and 368). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 9's oxygen nasal cannula tubing was clean and the nasal cannula and oxygen humidifier bottle were both labeled with the date they were last changed as per the facility's P&P to ensure they were changed weekly. The facility also failed to ensure Resident 9 had a physician's order for supplemental oxygen therapy. * The facility failed to provide Resident 368 the incentive spirometry therapy as ordered. These failures had the potential to adversely affect the health and well-being of the residents and posed the risk for equipment contamination and respiratory complications. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Administration revised June 2018 showed the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Under the section for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest physical well-being for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 51) who required dialysis. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 51's Facility Dialysis Communication Records (a form used to communicate the resident's health information such as vital signs, status of dialysis access site, presence and/or absence of bleeding before and after dialysis treatment, new physician's orders, and special instructions from the dialysis center) were completed for eight out of 16 dialysis days. This failure had the potential for Resident 51 not being provided with the appropriate care and treatment and the possibility of medical complications. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Dialysis Services revised November 2017 showed the facility will provide ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement their policies to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of the residents. * The licensed nurses failed to document in the Medication Administration Record after administering the controlled medications for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 9) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 27). This posed the risk of Residents 9 and 27 receiving additional medications which could negatively impact their health. * The facility failed to ensure the Station 2 Unit 2 glucometer was labeled and calibrated correctly. This failure had the potential to cause inaccurate blood sugar level readings and lead to inappropriate administration of insulin. Findings: 1. According to the facility's P&P titled Administering Medication revised April 2019, the individual administering the medications should initial the resident's Medication Administration Record on the appropriate line after giving medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 42) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior). * Resident 42 was receiving sertraline (antidepressant medication) for depression manifested by tearfulness. The physician increased the dose of the sertraline to 75 mg. However, the facility failed to ensure the documented rationale from the physician for increasing the dose of sertraline was based on Resident 42's assessed condition. In addition, the facility failed to provide documentation showing nonpharmacological interventions were attempted prior to increasing the dose of the medication. In addtion, the physician failed to obtain an informed consent from the resident or resident representative for the increased dose of sertraline. These failures had the potential for Residents 42 to experience adverse effects or receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. The facility's medication error rate was 7.14%. Two of three licensed nurses (LVNs 1 and 2) observed administering the medications were found to have made errors while administering the medications to one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 368) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 59). * LVN 2 failed obtain Resident 368's heart rate and blood pressure level before administering metoprolol (medication used to lower the blood pressure) to Resident 368. * LVN 1 failed to administer the medications per the physician's orders for Resident 59. These created the risk of complications and ineffective therapeutic effects of the medications. Findings: 1. On 6/2/21 at 0944 hours, a medication administration observation for Resident 368 was conducted with LVN 2. LVN 2 was observed preparing and administering seventeen medications to Resident 368. The medications included metoprolol 25 mg,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medications were stored and labeled properly as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure opened vials of Tubersol (used to test for tuberculosis) were labeled with the opened date to ensure they were discarded after 30 days as per the manufacturer's instructions. This posed the risk of accurate test results for residents testing for tuberculosis. * The facility failed to ensure the medication bottle for Xalatan (medication used to reduce pressure in the eyes) was labeled with the opened date to ensure it was discarded after six weeks. This had the potential for the medication's effectiveness to be affected. * RN 2 failed to label the IV antibiotic when administered to Resident 218. * The facility failed to ensure an expired medication was removed from the Station 2 medication cart. These posed the risk of medication administration errors. Findings: 1. According to the facility's P&P titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-08 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility P&P, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff had the appropriate skill set to safely perform the daily operations of the Food and Nutrition Services Department when: * Dietary Aide 3 was unable to state the appropriate water temperature necessary for the manual dishwashing procedure, verbalize the correct cool down procedure used to safely cool down ambient foods, and state the correct water temperature required to safely thaw foods using the sink thawing method. * Dietary Aides 1 and 2 were unable to correctly test the dish machine sanitizer. These failures had the potential for unsafe food practices which may lead to food borne illness in a highly susceptible population of 68 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the CMS 672 completed by the facility dated 6/1/21, showed 68 of 76 residents residing in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. 1a. Review of the facility's P&P titled 3 Compartment Procedure for Manual Dish Washing dated 2018 showed the first…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the food preference was honored for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 38). Resident 38 disliked vegetables, but was served green beans for lunch. This had the potential to negatively impact the resident's food intake and well-being. Findings: On 6/3/21 at 1305 hours, a lunch observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 38 in his room. Resident 38 ate the pasta on his plate, but the green beans and the meat was not touched. Review of Resident 38's dietary tray card (a card that displays resident information, diet type, and food preferences and allergies) showed the resident disliked vegetables. Resident 38 stated he did not like the vegetables, but they kept on serving it to him and he felt terrible about it. On 6/3/21 at 1305 hours, an interview and concurrent review of Resident 38's lunch tray and dietary tray card was conducted with CNA 4. CNA 4 verified Resident 38 was served with green beans even though the dietary tray card showed Resident 38 disliked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the infection control practices were implemented to help prevent the development and transmission of infections. * The facility failed to ensure Phlebotomist 1 donned the proper PPE when performing a blood draw in the Yellow Zone (a designated area in the facility to cohort residents under investigation [PUI] or newly admitted residents for observation). * The facility failed to ensure Occupational Therapist 1 carried the resident's soiled clothing and isolation gown away from his body and without touching his uniform. * The facility failed to ensure CNA 8 was informed of her positive COVID-19 test result in a timely manner and failed to properly screen her for symptoms of COVID-19 when she reported to work. These failures posed the risk for transmission of disease-causing microorganisms and infections. Findings: According to the facility's P&P titled Isolation - Categories of Transmission-Based Precaution revised 1/2012, standard precaution shall be used when caring for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the confidential personal and health information of the residents in the facility were protected. * The facility failed to ensure a non-employee was not permitted inside the medical records office. This failure had the potential for the residents' personal and health information to be accessed by an unauthorized person.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Rights dated 2001 showed the unauthorized release, access, or disclosure of resident information is prohibited. All release, access, or disclosure of resident information must be in accordance with current laws governing privacy information issues. All inquiries concerning the release of resident information should be directed to the HIPPA compliance officer. Review of the facility's P&P titled Protected Health Information (PHI), Management and Protection of dated 2001, showed PHI shall not be used or disclosed except as permitted by current federal and state laws. On 3/3/26 at 1103 hours, an observation and interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-10-14 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the discharge medication list was appropriate for one of two sampled residents (Resident 3) reviewed for discharge. * Resident 3's discharge medication list did not include the Verapamil (blood pressure medication), Ambien (medication used to treat insomnia) and oxycodone-acetaminophen (pain reliever medication). This failure had the potential for the resident not receiving appropriate care and proper medication management after the discharge. Findings: On 9/18/25, the CDPH, L&C Department received a complaint alleging upon discharge, Resident 3 was not provided with the Verapamil or Ambien medications upon leaving the facility on 6/12/25. On 10/2/25 at 1256 hours, a telephone interview was conducted with Resident 3. Resident 3 stated she left the faciity on 6/12/25, because the facility did not administer her Verapamil or Ambien medications. Closed medical record review for Resident 3 was conducted on 10/2/25. Resident 3 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 3) attained and maintained the highest practicable physical well-being * The facility failed to provide documented evidence Resident 3's physician was notified of Resident 3's abnormal blood pressure. Additionally, Resident 3's blood pressure was not retaken when it was documented it was above normal. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the resident.Findings: Closed medical record review for Resident 3 was conducted on 10/2/25. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 6/12/25. Review of Resident 3's Current Weights and Vitals dated 6/11/25, showed Resident 3's blood pressure was 142/86 mmHg. Further review of Resident 3's medical record showed the blood pressure reading on 6/11/25, was the only reading obtained for Resident 3. According to the National Library of Medicine Website, a normal blood pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmaceutical services were provided for two of eight sampled residents (Residents 3 and 4) reviewed for medications. * Resident 3's Verapamil (blood pressure medication) and Ambien (medication used to treat insomnia) were not available for Resident 3 to take. * The controlled medication count sheets for Resident 4's oxycodone were not on file. These failures had the potential for the residents to not receive appropriate care and proper medication management. Findings: 1. On 9/18/25, the CDPH, L&C department received a complaint alleging upon discharge, Resident 3 was not provided with the Verapamil or Ambien medications upon leaving the facility on 6/12/25. On 10/2/25 at 1256 hours, a telephone interview was conducted with Resident 3. Resident 3 stated she left the faciity on 6/12/25, because the facility did not administer her the Verapamil or Ambien medications. Resident 3 further stated she was told by the facility she (Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for infection control. * LVN 1's shoe was touching Resident 2's suprapubic catheter urine drainage bag. * LVN 1 failed to perform hand hygiene after removing dirty gloves and before putting on clean gloves. * Resident 2's suprapubic catheter urine drainage bag was touching the floor. These failures had the potential for cross-contamination and spread of infectious organisms in the facility.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene dated 2021 showed hand hygiene was to be performed after touching a resident, after removing a used glove, and before applying a clean glove. Review of the facility's P&P titled Catheter Care, Urinary dated 2001 showed under infection control, catheter tubing must be kept off the floor. On 10/7/25, at 1400 hours, an observation of urinary catheter care and concurrent interview was conducted with LVN 1. During the catheter care observation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan reflected the individual care needs for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to develop additional or different interventions in the care plan to reduce the risk of falls for Resident 1. This failure posed the risk of not providing the appropriate, consistent, and resident-centered care to the resident. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing revised 3/2018 showed the staff, with the input of the attending physician, will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of fall for each resident at risk or with a history of falls. If falling recurs despite initial interventions, staff will implement additional or different interventions or indicate why the current approach remains relevant. Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 6/10/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services to ensure the proper safe storage of drugs for one of six sampled residents (Resident 6). * LVN 1 left three medications inside a clear cup unattended on Resident 6's bedside table. This failure posed the risk of other residents, visitors or unauthorized facility staff gaining access to the medication. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications (undated) showed the medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. For residents not in their rooms or otherwise unavailable to receive medication on the pass, the MAR may be flagged. After completing the medication pass, the nurse will return to the missed resident to administer the medications. On 6/11/25 at 1204 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with LVN 1 at Resident 6's bedside. There were yellow, white, and pink tablets observed inside an unlabeled clear cup on top of Resident 6's bedside table. LVN 1 verified the findings and stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided the non-pharmacological interventions for the use of psychotropic medication (medication that affects the mind, emotions, and behavior). This failure had the potential to result in the unnecessary use of psychotropic medications for Resident 1. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Antipsychotic Medication Use (undated) showed for enduring psychiatric conditions, antipsychotic medications will not be used unless behavioral symptoms are not sufficiently relieved by non-pharmacological interventions. The staff will observe, document, and report to the attending physician information regarding the effectiveness of any interventions, including antipsychotic medications. Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 3/11/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 2/18/25, to the acute care hospital. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the privacy was provided for one of five final sampled residents (Resident 40) observed for medication administration. * The privacy curtain was not pulled to provide privacy during the GT medication administration for Resident 40. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the dignity of the residents and violate the residents' right to privacy. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 40 was initiated on 2/20/25. Resident 40 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 40's MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 40 had short and long-term memory problems. On 2/20/25 at 0830 hours, a medication administration observation was conducted with LVN 5. LVN 5 left the privacy curtain open on the left side of the bed facing the sliding door. The curtain of the sliding door was also left open, exposing Resident 40 to the outside patio and rooms across the patio. LVN 5 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-02-24 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the resident or the residents' representative was provided with a written or verbal notice of the facility's bed hold (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident in the acute care hospital) policy upon transfer to the acute care hospital for one of three residents (Resident 85) reviewed for closed records. This failure had the potential for the resident and the residents' representative to be unaware of their rights to return to the facility following a hospitalization. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Bed-Holds and Returns dated 2001 showed the residents and/or representatives are informed (in writing) of the facility and state (if applicable) bed-hold policies. All the residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care for one of 22 final sampled residents (Resident 5) was revised to address the resident's specific care needs when the resident refused to wear the sling on RUE as ordered by the physician. This failure posed the risk of not providing the appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to the resident. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 2001 showed a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetable to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Further review of the facility's P&P showed assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' condition change. Medical record review for Resident 5 was initiated on 2/18/25. Resident 5 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-02-24 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the performance evaluations were completed every 12 months for one of two CNAs' (CNA 7) employee files reviewed. This failure had the potential for the staff to not maintain competencies to provide the residents with needed and appropriate care and services. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Performance Evaluations (undated) showed the performance evaluation would be completed on each of the employee at the conclusion of his/her 90-day probationary period, and at least annually thereafter. The performance evaluation meeting will occur at the same time as the employee's compensation review. On 2/24/25 at 0902 hours, an interview and concurrent facility personnel record review was conducted with the DSD. Review of CNA 7's personnel record showed CNA 7 was rehired on 10/18/22. Further review of CNA 7's personnel record failed to show the performance evaluations were completed every 12 months for the past two years. The DSD verified the findings. The DSD stated it was the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's specimen refrigerator was in safe operating condition. * The facility failed to ensure the specimen refrigerator was maintained at the temperature range of 36-46 degrees F and the freezer compartment of the specimen refrigerator was free of ice buildup. These failures had the potential to affect the resident's health due to the refrigerator not being maintaned. Findings: On 2/19/25 at 1115 hours, an inspection of the specimen refrigerator in the nurses' station and concurrent interview was conducted with RN 3. The specimen refrigerator's temperature was 28 degrees F. Additionally, there was ice build-up in the freezer compartment of the refrigerator. Review of the facility's document titled Specimen Refrigerator Temperature Log for February 2025 showed the temperature should be between 36F- 46F and the refrigerator's latest temperature on 2/19/25 was 36 degrees F. RN 3 acknowledged and confirmed the above findings. On 2/24/25 at 1630 hours, an interview was conducted with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-02-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the personal belonging inventory process were completed for one of 22 final sampled residents (Resident 336). * The facility failed to ensure a copy of Resident 10's personal inventory list was provided to the resident upon admission. This failure had the potential for the resident's personal belongings not being accounted for accurately. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Personal Property dated 2001 showed the resident's personal belongings and clothing are inventoried and documented upon admission and updated as necessary. Medical record review for Resident 10 was initiated on 2/18/25. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 10's Resident Inventory of Personal Effects form dated 1/8/25, signed by the resident and facility staff, showed the triplicate copies of the form were attached together with white, yellow, and pink colors. The bottom section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2021-06-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the staff provided care in a manner that promoted dignity and respect. The facility failed to ensure the staff were not standing over two nonsampled residents (Residents 55 and 888) when assisting them with their lunch meals. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being. Findings: 1. On 6/1/21 at 1300 hours, Resident 888 was observed in bed being assisted to eat lunch by CNA 5. CNA 5 was observed standing over Resident 888 while assisting the resident to eat. On 6/1/21 at 1310 hours, an interview was conducted with CNA 5. CNA 5 acknowledged she should have sat beside the resident when assisting the resident to eat. CNA stated she was trained to not stand over the resident but to sit and face the resident when providing meal assistance. CNA 5 stated she was to get a chair and sit besides the resident when assisting the resident during meals. CNA 5 stated she forgot to get a chair to be able to sit besides Resident 888. 2. On 6/3/21 at 1249 hours, Resident 55 was observed seated in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2021-06-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the garbage was stored in a sanitary manner. This posed a threat of pest contamination. Findings: According to the USDA Food Code 2017, 5-501.113, Covering Receptacles, receptacles and waste handling units for refuse .shall be kept covered (B) with tight-fitting lids or doors if kept outside the food establishment. Review of the facility P&P titled Removal of Refuse (Trash) from Kitchen (undated) showed to close the dumpster lid. On 6/1/21 at 0900 hours, an observation of the facility garbage was conducted with the Maintenance Director. Two dumpsters were observed overflowing with garbage restricting the lids from closing. The Maintenance Director confirmed the dumpster lids must be closed.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
WOLF, SALINAIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2024
SISCO, MATTHEWIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/23/2023
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/05/2021
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/05/2021
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/05/2021
MURRAY, JASONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/05/2021

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$20.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+21.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 3%Medicare 37%Other / private 61%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$511per resident / day
operating cost
$15,532per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$650per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055929. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next