La Paloma Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 194 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 84.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2021-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall safety interventions for two of six residents (Resident 35 and Resident 23) reviewed for accidents were provided when: Resident 35's chair/bed silent alarm (an alarm used to help warn staff when a resident is changing position or getting up) was not implemented consistently; In addition, Resident 35's falls were not thoroughly investigated to ensure that all fall preventative measures were implemented. Resident 23's wheechair was placed in an area that was not within the resident's reach. In addition, the facility was not secured during the night when a visitor's entrance was left open and unlocked. As a result, Resident 35 fell eight times while at the facility. One of Resident 35's fall resulted in a laceration on the forehead which required suturing. Resident 23 had the potential to fall and become injured. Furthermore, not securing the facility from potential intruders put the safety of all residents's at risk. Findings:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded for a resident who discharged to the hospital for 1 (Resident #84) of 3 residents reviewed for closed records. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment, revised 11/2019, indicated, Any person completing a portion of the Minimum Data Set/MDS (Resident Assessment Instrument) must sign and certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment. An admission Record indicated, the facility admitted Resident #84 on [DATE]. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (an autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system [brain and spinal cord]), urinary tract infection, and sepsis (a life-threatening medical emergency caused by the body's extreme response to an infection, often leading to organ dysfunction and potentially death). Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 (Resident #6) of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions. Specifically, Resident #6 had an order, dated 03/26/2025, to schedule a dermatology appointment. However, no attempts were made to schedule a dermatology appointment until 04/15/2025. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Physician Orders, revised 06/2013, indicated, Physician orders must be given, managed and carried out in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. A facility policy titled, Resident Appointments, revised 03/2025, indicated, 1. [NAME] Clerk shall coordinate/schedule resident appointments. The policy also stated, 4. [NAME] Clerk will document the appointment in the resident's medical record. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #6 on 06/11/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia (involuntary muscle movements), hypertensive heart disease without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow the pharmacist's recommendations for 1 (Resident #6) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medication Regimen Reviews, revised 05/2019, indicated, The Consultant Pharmacist reviews the medication regimen or each resident at least monthly. The policy revealed the section titled, Policy Interpretation and Implementation included 1. The Consultant Pharmacist performs a medication regimen review (MRR) for every resident in the facility receiving medication. Further review revealed, 8. Within 24 hours of the MRR, the Consultant Pharmacist provides a written report to the attending physician for each resident identified as having a non-life threatening medication irregularity. The section further revealed, 12. The attending physician documents in the medical record that the irregularity has been reviewed and what (if any) action was taken to address it. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #6 on 06/11/2022.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to offer the influenza vaccine and provide education regarding influenza immunizations for 1 (Resident #32) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Influenza Vaccine, revised 08/2016, indicated, All residents and employees who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against influenza. The facility shall provide pertinent information about the significant risks and benefits of vaccines to staff and residents (or residents' legal representatives). The facility policy indicated, 1. Between October 1st and March 31st each year, the influenza vaccine shall be offered to residents and employees, unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated or the resident or employee has already been immunized. The policy indicated, 6. A resident's refusal of the vaccine shall be documented on the Informed Consent for Influenza Vaccine and placed in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor resident ' s preference for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was showered despite his refusal. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 1 ' s emotional well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated he had diagnoses of hemiplegia (weakness to one side of the body), hypertension (elevated blood pressure). A review of Resident 1 ' s minimum data assessment (MDS, an assessment tool) Section C Cognitive Patterns dated 7/19/23 indicated Resident 1 ' s cognition was intact. An interview was conducted on 8/9/23 at 12:31 P.M with Resident 1. Resident 1 stated on 7/31/23 at approximately 7:00 A.M. – 8:00 A.M., certified nursing assistant (CNA) 1 offered him a shower. He (Resident 1) told CNA 1 he did not want to have a shower. Resident 1 instead agreed to a bed bath. Resident 1 was surprised when CNA 1 and a rehabilitation personnel (RP) assisted him up to a shower chair from his bed and was brought to the shower room. A phone interview was conducted with CNA 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the needed care for one of three residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was not monitored for signs of abnormal blood pressure (BP, pressure of the blood). This failure had the potential to affect the resident ' s well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated, he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses of congestive heart failure (heart does not pump blood), hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of the prescriber ' s order, dated 6/20/23 indicated, Observe signs and symptoms of bleeding secondary to anticoagulant (medication to prevent blood clots) use. An interview was conducted on 7/6/23 at 12:42 P.M. with licensed nurse (LN 1). LN 1 stated a low BP reading can be a sign of bleeding. LN 1 further stated residents with low BP should be assessed further. A concurrent interview and record review was conducted on 7/6/23 at 1:15 P.M. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). The ADON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to use pressure relieving mattresses as ordered for 4 of 9 residents sampled for pressure related injuries (24, 53, 66, 16). In addition, 1 resident (16) was not repositioned as ordered. As a result, there was the risk of skin breakdown. Findings: 1. Per the facility's Resident Face Sheet, Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include pressure ulcer (pressure related skin breakdown) of the sacral region (area above the tailbone). Per Resident 24's physician order dated 2/15/21, Treatment: LAL mattress (Low Air Loss mattress, used to relieve pressure). Set mode at alternating, per weight or residents comfort . On 7/7/21 at 8:41 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 24. Resident 24 was lying on an LAL mattress, which was set to 140. Resident 24 stated, she had not asked the facility to adjust the pressure on her mattress. Per Resident 24's clinical record, on 7/5/21 Resident 24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-07-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to answer call lights in a timely manner to meet the needs of the residents for 6 out of 10 confidential residents (A, B, C, D, E, and F) and 6 of 22 sampled residents (13, 53, 23, 41, and 71) and 1 unsampled resident (222). This failure had the potential to result in residents not receiving needed services timely and efficiently. Findings: 1. A review of Resident Council Meeting minutes on 5/20/21 and 6/30/21, indicated call lights were not being answered in a timely matter. On 7/7/21 at 10:02 A.M., a group interview with confidential residents was conducted. During the confidential group interview, five out of nine residents raised concerns regarding delay in answering call lights and having insufficient staff to provide care for all the residents. a) Resident A stated call light issues were always ongoing, especially at nighttime. Resident A further stated sometimes when the call light was on, the staff walked by their room without answering the light.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-07-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a policy to prevent abuse for one resident (Resident 2), when the facility did not follow abuse reporting requirements after the resident reported the incident to the staff. This failure had the potential to compromise resident safety. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis of right lower limb (skin infection of the right leg), and speech and language development delay (slower to develop) due to hearing loss on per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 7/6/21 at 9:55 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 2. Resident 2 stated a nurse threw a creamer packet at him about a month ago around 4:30 A.M. Resident 2 stated he did not know the nurse's name, but the alleged nurse was still working to this date. Resident 2 stated he reported the incident to licensed nurse (LN) 31 and was told she would talk to the alleged staff. Resident 2 stated he had not heard any updates from LN 31.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-07-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported in a timely manner for one resident (Resident 2). This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 2 and other residents' safety. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis of right lower limb (skin infection of the right leg) and speech and language development delay (slower to develop) due to hearing loss per facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 7/6/21 at 9:55 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 2. Resident 2 stated a nurse threw a creamer packet at him about a month ago around 4:30 A.M. Resident 2 stated he did not know the nurse's name, but the alleged nurse was still working to this date. Resident 2 stated he reported the incident to licensed nurse (LN) 31 and was told she would talk to the alleged staff. Resident 2 stated he had not heard any updates from LN 31. On 7/7/21 at 3:13 P.M., an interview was conducted with LN 31. LN 31 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $883K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA