Ojai Health & Rehabilitation
601 North Montgomery Street, Ojai, CA 93023 · For profit - Corporation · 74 certified beds · (805) 646-8124 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Nov 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.9% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.7% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.7% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.3% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.5% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.4% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 23.0% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.89 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.89 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 127 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 89.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.4%CMS range 51.3–68.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.3%CMS range 9.5–17.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 89.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 74.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 76.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 73.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.7–10.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.49 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 68.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure informed consent (a communication process where a healthcare provider educates a patient about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a proposed treatment or procedure and patient acknowledges to have treatment or procedure done) was obtained when the dose increased for administration of psychotropic medication use for one of two residents (Resident 34).This failure resulted with the responsible party (RP) not having autonomy in medical decision-making before the resident received the medication. Findings:During a review of the admission Record (AR), admission date 3/25/26, the AR indicated Resident 34 is a [AGE] year old female with diagnoses including hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side (paralysis or severe weakness affecting the entire left side of the body), malignant neoplasm of brain (abnormal growth of cells that forms a tumor), epilepsy (a brain disorder that causes repeated, unprovoked seizures) major depressive disorder (mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered plan of care for scabies rash like skin condition was formulated for one of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 17). This failure had the potential to hinder continuity of care and not to address all aspects of residents' condition and required responses without the comprehensive information of the care plan.Findings:During a review of the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered, dated 5/2026, the P&P indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident.8. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will.g. Incorporate identified problem areas.k. Reflect treatment goals, timetables and objectives in measurable outcomes.m. Aid in preventing or reducing decline in the resident's functional status and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure compliance with the required 3.5 direct care hours per patient day (DHPPD), resulting in insufficient staffing on 11 of 26 weekend days. This facility failure has the potential to result to unmet care and needs to residents. Findings:During a review of the facility's Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report fiscal year (FY), Quarter one 2025 (October 1 -December 31), the report indicated fiscal year quarter one .Excessively Low Weekend Staffing .A review of the facility's Internal Nursing Home Per Patient Day (NHPPD) Audit Report generated date 6/10/26, showed the following Direct Care Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD) for weekend days from 10/4/25 through 12/28/25: 10/5/25 - 3.44 hours 10/12/25 - 3.17 hours 10/18/25 - 3.19 hours 10/19/25 - 3.12 hours 10/26/25 - 3.15 hours 11/2/25 - 3.30 hours 11/16/25 - 3.38 hours 12/7/25 - 3.49 hours 12/13/25 - 3.48 hours 12/14/25 - 3.18 hours 12/28/25 - 3.26 hoursThe Internal NHPPD Audit Report confirmed that the facility failed to meet the 3.5 DHPPD minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow it's policy and procedures (P&P) for disposition (process for destroying unused medications) and reconciling (system of recordkeeping that ensures an accurate inventory of medications) of controlled medications (medications with a high potential for abuse and addiction) when:Two opened vials of Lorazepam (controlled medication used to treat anxiety) stored in medication cart 1 were not destroyed appropriately.One count sheet for Morphine (controlled medication used for pain) was incorrect for one out of 17 sampled residents (Resident 6). This failure had the potential to result in drug diversion (the illegal distribution or abuse of controlled prescription drugs) of controlled medications.1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/10/26 at 2:26 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), two opened, single use vials of Lorazepam were observed stored in medication cart 1 with liquid medication remaining in the vials. One vial was observed stored in the right far back section of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored appropriately when:Expired medications were stored in medication cart 1.Resident 34's prescription medication was stored in the medication supply room with unopened over the counter medications.Two vials of Furosemide (medication used for fluid retention) stored in medication cart 2 were unlabeled. These facility failures had the potential to result in administering expired and ineffective medications to residents and had potential for medication administration errors.1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/10/26 at 2:44 p.m., with Director of Staff Development (DSD), two opened foil packets of DuoNeb (medication used to treat breathing issues) were observed stored in medication cart 1. One foil packet was dated 5/19/26 and one foil packet was undated. DSD stated there is no way to know when the foil package was opened and is considered expired. DSD confirmed the two DuoNeb foil packets were expired. During a concurrent interview and record review on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a kitchen staff member was wearing a beard covering in the kitchen during meal preparation. This failure had the potential to result in Foodborne illness (commonly known as known as food poisoning, refers to any sickness caused by eating or drinking foods or beverages contaminated with harmful bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxic chemicals). During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/8/26 at 12:01 PM with the Registered Dietician (RD) and the Dietary Supervisor (DS), in the kitchen, a Dietary Aid (DA1) was observed placing items on a shelf near the area where hot foods were being prepared for lunch service with a full facial beard that was not covered by a beard restraint (a hair net that covers facial hair). RD and DS both agreed according to facility policy, DA1 should be wearing a net over his beard to prevent contamination of food for residents. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Dress Code dated 2023, indicated If applicable, beards and mustaches (any facial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record of one of 17 sampled residents (resident 11), contained documentation of oxygen given as needed (PRN). This failure had the potential to result in an incomplete medical record as well as the ability to evaluate Resident 11's respiratory (breathing) status and effectiveness of treatment.During a review of the admission Record (AR), admission date 12/11/17, the AR indicated Resident 11 was a [AGE] year-old female with diagnosis including atherosclerotic heart disease (hardening and narrowing of blood vessels), hypertension (high blood pressure), dementia (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere in daily life), and palliative care (medical care for anyone living with a serious illness focused on providing relief from symptoms). During an observation on 6/8/26 at 10:30 AM in the room of Resident 11, Resident 11 is observed with eyes closed, wearing a nasal cannula (tubing used to deliver oxygen directly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to adhere to its own policy and procedure (P&P) on handling soiled linen when two (2) out of 17 sampled residents (Resident 17 & 50) were placed on contact isolation precautions from 5/11/26 to 5/18/26 due to a skin rash resembling scabies observed in Resident 17. Despite this precaution, the facility failed to implement the proper protocol regarding the management and storage of contaminated linen as outlined in their infection control guidelines. This failure placed both the staff and residents' health and safety at risk by storing multiple plastic bags of contaminated linen inside the residents' room for seven (7) consecutive days thereby exposing both staff and residents to possible spread of infections in the facility.Findings:During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Infectious Disease Threat, Infection Control Measures, During, dated 5/2026, the P&P indicated, When an infectious disease threat in the geographic region of the facility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) of an unusual occurrence involving a resident who was found to have a fracture of the outer ankle bone of the left leg. Requiring transfer to the emergency room for further evaluation and treatment.The facility's failure to notify CDPH had the potential to delay regulatory oversight of a significant injury and to inhibit external evaluation of resident safety practices.Findings:During a review of the residents Nursing Progress Notes dated 3/25/26 - 4/6/26 indicated:On 04/04/26, resident had a behavioral outburst requiring de escalation interventions; during assessment afterward, staff identified left ankle pain and discoloration.X ray on 04/05/26 showed a fracture involving the lateral malleolus with displacement. (Broken piece of the bone shifted out of normal alignment.)emergency room evaluation on 04/05/2026 confirmed an acute, comminuted distal fibular diaphyseal fracture. (Fracture of the outer ankle bone of the left leg.)During an interview on 4/28/26 at 3:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff followed physician ordered parameters when administering as needed pain medication for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2). This facility failure had the potential to cause the resident ineffective pain relief and decreased quality of life.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AD), the AD indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral infarction (the death of brain tissue as a result of reduced or blocked blood flow), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (complete paralysis and weakness) affecting right dominant side, generalized muscle weakness, and depression (persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities, and low energy). During an observation and interview on 4/8/26 at 11:22 a.m., with Resident 1, Resident 1 was observed sitting in the hallway outside his room. Resident 1 stated he has experienced constant pain for the past year and feels miserable. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility failed to ensure Resident 1's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications when Resident 1's physician order for lidocaine patch (a topical medication that delivers local anesthetic directly to the skin to provide temporary relief for localized muscle, joint, or nerve pain) exceeded manufacturer's instructions. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to receive more than the recommended dose per manufacturer's recommendations. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AD), the AD indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral infarction (the death of brain tissue as a result of reduced or blocked blood flow), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (complete paralysis and weakness) affecting right dominant side, generalized muscle weakness, and depression (persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities, and low energy). During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, dated 4/8/26, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan (CP - written document that outlines the specific nursing interventions and goals for a patient's care, based on their assessed needs and diagnoses) for pain was updated to reflect the resident's current care needs and interventions for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in inadequate pain management and could negatively impact Resident 1's psychosocial wellbeing.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AD), the AD indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral infarction (the death of brain tissue as a result of reduced or blocked blood flow), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (complete paralysis and weakness) affecting right dominant side, generalized muscle weakness, and depression (persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities, and low energy).During an observation and interview on 4/8/26 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) to ensure the resident maintained the highest physical well-being; when there were no Physician's Orders that addressed hospice care (program that gives special care to people who are near the end of life), the use and care of a urinary catheter (a flexible tube that collects urine form the bladder and collected in a drainage bag), and use, care, discontinuation, and monitoring for a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC- a long, thin tube that's inserted through a vein in the arm). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 2 not receiving necessary care and services consistent with their health status.During a review of Resident 2's Clinical Record (CR) indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] under hospice with diagnoses that include cerebral infarction (the death of brain tissue as a result of reduced or blocked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure compliance with the required 3.5 direct care hours per patient day, resulting in insufficient staffing on 2 of 28 days reviewed.This failure had the potential to result in unmet care needs, inadequate supervision, delayed response to changes in condition, and avoidable adverse outcomes for residents. A review of the facility's Direct Care Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD) staffing logs for the month of 2/1/26 - 2/28/26 , showed the facility reported the following direct care hours: 2/2/26 - 3.40 hours 2/8/26 - 3.46 hoursThe records confirmed that 2 of 28 days reviewed, the facility failed to meet the staffing minimum of 3.5 DHPPD.During an interview on 4/2/26 at 11:40 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), stated to be aware of the 3.5 DHPPD staffing requirement, but were not aware that the facility did not the staffing minimum of 3.5 DHPPD requirement for the month of February 2026. A review of the facility's program waiver for staffing, dated June 2, 2025, (A program waiver for staffing is an authorized exception…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was identified as at risk for elopement, left facility without knowledge of staff, and was found a block from the facility.Findings:During an interview on 9/25/25 at 1 p.m. with the director of nursing (DON), the DON stated, We didn't realize Resident 1 was missing until the fire department brought him back. He wasn't gone from the facility that long, so we didn't think reporting to CDPH was necessary. During an interview on 9/25/25 at approx. 1:30 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2), CNA 2 verbalized, heard the wander guard alarm sound, checked the back door of the facility, did not see any residents, assumed it was a false alarm and did not realize a resident was missing until the fire department showed up.During an interview on 10/8/25 at 8 a.m. with [NAME] County Fire Captain (FC), the FC stated, When we arrived on scene there was a gentleman…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to comply with the state requirement of unusual occurrence by not reporting to the Department (State Agency) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). When a Resident with a history of dementia left the care facility without knowledge to staff, fell and was transported to emergency department.This deficient practice resulted in a delayed investigation by the Department.Findings:During an interview on 9/25/25 at 1 p.m. with the director of nursing (DON), the DON stated, We didn't realize Resident 1 was missing until the fire department brought him back. He wasn't gone from the facility that long, so we didn't think reporting to CDPH was necessary. During an interview on 9/25/25 at approx. 1:30 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2), CNA verbalized, they heard the wander guard alarm sound, checked the back door of the facility, did not see any residents, assumed it was a false alarm and did not realize a resident was missing until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-15 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure four employees working as Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs 1, 2, 3, and 4) had valid and up-to-date CNA certifications. 2. Ensure two employee personnel files (CNAs 1and 3) were complete and up to date.These failures resulted in unlicensed CNAs providing direct care to residents without proper certification and placed residents' safety at risk.1. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:05 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSD stated the CNA is responsible for maintaining up to date certification and I double check with the files. DSD further stated we had to check three or four months ago and knew the CNAs who were about to expire and reminded them to get it done and that they can't be on the schedule, it's paper tracking and we keep a schedule of who is due. We will let them know when it will expire and prompt them again and when they get the certification, they will bring it in. We only go online to verify if it's expiring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents while smoking for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2). This failure had the potential for residents to suffer significant injuries. During an observation on 5/30/25 at 8:35 a.m. while walking up to the front entrance of the facility, Resident 2 was observed lying in the street after sustaining a fall from his wheelchair after going off the curb of the sidewalk while alone in the front of the facility to smoke a cigarette. The surveyor walked into the facility to look for staff to get assistance but was unable to locate any staff members. The surveyor walked down the hall to the nurse's station and alerted Charge Nurse (CN) of Resident 2 lying in the street next to his wheelchair. Observed multiple staff running out of the facility to assist the resident back into his wheelchair and assess Resident 2 for injuries. Followed staff outside to the front of the facility to observe. Resident 2 was yelling at staff to leave him alone and not to call an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff observations of resident skin issues and/or conditions were consistently and accurately documented in the skin monitoring form for two of two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2). These failures had the potential to result in inaccuracies of information which could affect the delivery of care and services for these residents affecting health and safety. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/14/25 at 11:55 a.m., with the facility's (Interim) Director of Nursing (DON), the facility form titled, Skin Monitoring (SM): CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) Shower Review, was reviewed. DON verbalized that the SM form is used by CNAs to document skin observations of their assigned residents during bed baths/showers. The SM form included a list of skin issues/conditions and a body chart to graph the exact location of the skin issue/condition. DON further verbalized the CNA will report the observed skin issues/conditions to the charge nurse. During a review of Resident 1's Nursing - Comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) suspicion of abuse for one resident (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to delay investigation and affect physical and psychosocial well-being of Resident 1. Findings: During an interview on 3/25/25 at 11:35 a.m. with licensed nurse (LN) 3, LN 3 verbalized heard rumors of the abuse, reported it to the former Operations Manager (FOM). The FOM requested LN 3 write a statement regarding the alleged abuse. LN 3 provided a written statement and did not report the alleged abuse further. During an interview on 3/25/25 at 1:10 p.m. with Human Resources (HR), HR verbalized FOM knew about the allegations, an investigation was conducted. The employee was terminated. they used evidence of text messages and information gathered from a phone to terminate the employee. HR thought the FOM was to notify the CDPH. During an interview on 3/25/25 at 1:30 p.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSD verbalized the information was given to the FOM and believed the FOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policies and procedure when a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 1) reported an alleged incident of sexual abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to a nurse, who did not report the allegation to the administration. This failure resulted in a delay in the investigation of the alleged sexual abuse. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, dated 2001, the P&P indicated: If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. During an interview on 3/13/25 at 2:11 p.m. with CNA 1, CNA 1 stated that during rounds at 6:30 a.m., Resident 1 reported that her roommate was fondled by a male staff member during a brief change last night. CNA 1 stated that she immediately reported Resident 1's allegation to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was an informed consent for the use of bed rails for one of five sampled residents (Resident 4). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 4 or representative not to be given the information needed to make an informed decision. Findings: During an observation on 02/24/25 at 10:47 a.m. in Resident 4's room, Resident 4 was sleeping in bed with two full-length bed rails up. During a concurrent interview and record review on 02/26/25 at 10:48 a.m. with a Licensed Nurse (LN 1), Resident 4's electronic and paper records were reviewed. There was no evidence of an informed consent for the use of bed rails in Resident 4's electronic or paper record. LN 1 confirmed that no informed consent on the explanation of risks and benefits regarding the use of bed rails was in Resident 4's records. During a review of facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Bed Safety and Bed Rails, dated May 2024, the P&P indicated, Before using bed rails for any reason, the staff shall inform the resident or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide information about the right to formulate an advanced directive (a legal document that states a person's wishes for medical care if they are unable to communicate them) for four of four sampled residents (Residents 4, 18, 20, and 42). In addition, the facility failed to establish, maintain, and implement written policies and procedures regarding the residents right to formulate an advanced directive. These failures had the potential for the residents' decisions regarding their health care and treatment not being honored. Findings: During a review of Residents 4, 18, 20, and 42's admission Packet Forms, the Packets did not contain any written form indicating, a review of the process in the formulation of an advanced directive was discussed with and acknowledged by the resident or resident's representative. During an interview on 02/26/25 at 10:30 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN 1), LN 1 confirmed there was no written evidence regarding a discussion about advanced directives during or anytime after admission present in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. The toilet grab bar in room [ROOM NUMBER] was present. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s room temperature was within ideal temperature range, as per facility policy. These failures had the potential to compromise resident safety and comfort. Findings: 1. During an observation on 02/24/25 at 10:59 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s restroom, the restroom was observed without a grab bar next to the toilet seat and on the wall were holes where the grab bar should have been. During an interview on 02/24/25 at 11:05 a.m. with Resident 42 in room [ROOM NUMBER], the resident stated using the toilet in room [ROOM NUMBER] because the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] does not have a grab bar next to the toilet, making it hard to move from sitting to standing and stated mentioning the concern to the maintenance supervisor (MS) about three weeks ago. During an interview on 02/26/25 at 10:30 a.m. with the MS, MS stated not being aware of the missing grab bar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability) Level II Evaluation (a person-centered evaluation that is completed for anyone identified as positive for Level I screening or as having or suspected of having serious mental illness, intellectual disability, developmental disability or related condition) was completed for one of four sampled residents (Resident 51). This failure had the potential to result in the resident not receiving appropriate care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 51's admission Record (AR), dated 2/27/25, the AR indicated, Resident 51 is a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, disorganized schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by disorganized thinking, speech, and behavior), unspecified psychosis (a collection of symptoms that involves a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan of one of four sampled residents (Resident 46) was revised to address the significant decline of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - a 15-point cognitive screening measure that evaluates memory and orientation impairments in older adults; 0-7 points suggests severe cognitive impairment, 8-12 points suggests moderate cognitive impairment, 13-15 points suggests cognition is intact) scores of the resident. This failure had the potential to result in appropriate care and services not being provided to the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 46's, admission Record (AR), dated 2/27/25, the AR indicated in part, Resident 46 is a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, Wernicke's encephalopathy (a brain and memory disorder due to a lack of Vitamin B1 requiring immediate treatment) and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that affects how a person feels, thinks,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was protected from misappropriation of property when a package received was open with missing items. This failure resulted in violating Resident 1's rights to receive unopened, intact packages, and right to privacy. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 11/27/24, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including, below the knee amputation (missing their left leg from the knee downwards), acute respiratory failure (difficulty breathing), and depression (feeling of sadness and low energy that affects quality of life.) During a review of Resident 1's, MDS (Minimum Data Sheet - a federally mandated process of clinical assessment for nursing home patients) Assessment, dated 11/5/24, the MDS indicated, Section C - Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment indicated, Resident 1 had a BIMS Score of 15 (The BIMS assessment uses a points…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when a pain medication was not available within 24 hours from order date. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have untreated pain and hinder recovery. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (Orders), dated 10/14/24, the Orders indicated, Oxycodone HCl 20 mg tablet (controlled substance, pain medication). Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain management. During a review of Resident 1's Medication and Administration Record (MAR), dated October 2024, the MAR indicated, the order start date was 10/15/24, but first dose of Oxycodone HCl 20 mg tablet was not given until 10/19/24. During a review of Resident 1's Controlled Drug Record, with administration dates from 10/19/24-10/30/24, the Drug Record label indicated, the fill date for the Oxycodone was 10/18/24 with first dose given on 10/19/24 at 9:50 a.m. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/15/24 at 4:40 p.m. with Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a temperature range of 71-81 degrees Fahrenheit in the facility when temperatures throughout the facility measured between 64.9 and 65.2-degrees Fahrenheit, and one resident (Resident 1) was found with a plugged in space heater in their shared room. These facility failures violated all 72 resident's rights to have comfortable and safe temperatures within the facility and posed a risk for fire with a space heater in a resident ' s shared room. Findings: During a tour of the facility on 11/09/24 at 2:45 AM, the facility temperature felt cold throughout the facility even with a warm jacket on. Residents were observed with multiple blankets on sleeping. Staff were awake and were using blankets and all were wearing jackets. The resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] B had a space heater in their room. It was plugged in and the light was on, but the heater itself was off. Resident 1 was asleep in bed. During an interview on 11/09/24 at 2:55 AM with a certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-09 · tag F0839 — patternEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow state laws regarding name badges for employees working in the facility actively caring for residents when 6 of 7 employees working did not have name badges. This facility failure had the potential for unauthorized people to act like employees in the facility, and also prevents residents knowing who is caring for them. Findings: According to the California Business & Professional Code, under Section 680 a) except as otherwise provided in this section, a health care practitioner shall disclose, while working his or her name and practitioner ' s license status, as granted by this state, on a name tag in at least 18-point type. A health care practitioner in a practice or an office, whose license is prominently displayed, may opt to not wear a name tag. If a health care practitioner or a licensed clinical social worker is working in a psychiatric setting or in a setting that is not licensed by the state, the employing entity or agency shall have the discretion to make an exception from the name tag requirement for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0837 — isolatedEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow facility polices and procedures for unusual occurrence when Resident 1 was brought to the hospital for an alleged overdose of medication. This failure resulted in the facility failing to report the unusual occurrence to the California Department of Public Health. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resdient 1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including, DM II (high blood sugar levels), thrombocytopenia (a condition with low number of platelets or blood component that help form clots to stop bleeding), lymphedema (a condition that causes swelling due to accumulation of watery fluid that carries nutrients, white blood cells throughout the body), repeated falls, contusion (bruise) of the knee, acute respiratory (lung) infection, history of psychoactive (a drug that causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings or behavior)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident ' s room was free from a cracked window for one out of five sampled residents (Resident 5). This failure has the potential to be a safety risk to Resident 5. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/21/2024 at 3:31 p.m. with Resident 5 and the Director of Maintenance (DOM) in Resident 5 ' s room, a rectangular shaped window next to Resident 5 ' s bed was noted to have a crack in the glass. The crack had a starburst type pattern (small chip with several cracks radiating out of the center) and approximately 20 cracked lines which extended from the central point to three boarders of the window frame. Resident 5 verbalized they had been at the facility for about five weeks, and the window had been like that since they arrived. The DOM verbalized the window had the crack for a couple of months and it needed to be taken care of. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/21/2024 at 3:35 p.m., with the DOM, the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Maintenance Service,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), as evidenced by no documentation of the following physician orders: 1. COVID-19 testing on days 3 and 5 after admission. 2. Check Temperature every shift. This failure had the potential for facility missing changes in Resident 1's health condition and a delay in treatment. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (Orders), dated 3/15/24, the Orders indicated, Perform COVID-19 tests on days 1, 3, and 5 after admission. During a review of Resident 1's Medication and Administration Record (MAR), dated March 2024, the MAR indicated, only one COVID-19 test performed on 3/16/24 for day one. No licensed staff initials for days three and five. 2. During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (Orders), dated 3/15/24, the Orders indicated, Check Temperature every shift. During a review of Resident 1's Temperature Summary for the month of April 2024, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-29 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to accurately post contact information with the name, addresses, and phone number for the State agency (California Department of Public Health [CDPH]) in an accessible and understandable manner and failed to ensure the posting included a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency. These failures had the potential that residents rights to be informed of these agencies and services would not be supported. Findings: During an interview on 4/25/24 at 10:24 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated, I asked the administrator for the phone number to file a complaint and they wouldn't give it to me. Resident 1 further stated, I know it's supposed to be posted somewhere. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/25/24 at 1 p.m. with the director of nursing (DON), the Important Facility Information was observed posted in a glass display case on the wall beside the First Hall nurses station. The posted information in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public when the maintenance department was cluttered and trash bins were overflowing. This failure had the potential to create an unsafe environment for the residents and visitors due to possible pest infestation, spread of diseases in the facility, and exposure to hazardous materials. Findings: During an interview on 4/25/24 at 11:05 a.m. with the facility ' s maintenance staff (MS), MS indicated the maintenance department is responsible for providing services to all areas of the facility. During an observation on 4/25/24 at 11:08 a.m. MS opened a door to the maintenance department. Observations of the maintenance department and the facility ' s grounds revealed the following: 1. Multiple large cardboard boxes were piled up and overflowing with trash. 2. A broken closet door leaning against a wall, covering an open doorway. 3. Air conditioner vent covered with a black organic substance. 4. Trash bins overflowing with yard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment for 61 of 61 residents when: 1. The residents' drinking water dispenser contained several areas of a brown slimy substance in the drip tray. 2. The air gap vent on the ice machine had a brown grime substance and broken drain pipe. These failures had the potential to cause waterborne illness, from drinking contaminated water, in a vulnerable resident population. Findings: During an observation on 4/25/24 at 10:23 a.m. in First Hall, the residents' drinking water dispenser (a hospital-grade machine that provides safe drinking water) was observed to have a brown slimy substance in several areas of the drip tray. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/25/24 at 10:24 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), CNA stated, the water dispenser in First Hall was used by all residents was observed. CNA acknowledged the residents' drinking water dispenser was dirty and had a brown slimy substance in several areas of the drip tray. During an observation and interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision and assistance for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) during transportation to and from an appointment outside of the facility. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not waiting for transportation and leaving the appointment. Resident 1 subsequently fell out of their wheelchair near a road with heavy traffic and verbalized they did not know where they were or how to return to the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 2/28/24, the OSR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, major traumatic brain injury (TBI) with concussion (a brain injury caused by a blow to the head), subdural hematoma (a pool of blood between the brain and its outermost covering), fractures to the mandible (Jawbone) and zygomatic arch (a bone that runs alongside of the head). Resident 1 was left with reduced mental acuity (a person's ability to make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to meet the resident's needs for seven of eight sampled residents (Residents 4, 9, 10, 11, 6, 7, and 8), when: 1. The facility did not meet required direct care service hours 15 days from 11/1/23 through 12/13/23. 2. Residents 4, 9, 10, and 11 were not given their prescribed medications for one or more shifts/days. 3. Residents 6, 7, and 8 tested positive for COVID and nursing was not documenting their progress and/or response to treatment for a minimum of 72 hours. This failure had the potential of physical or psychosocial harm due to missed medications or no documentation of residents' response to treatment. Findings: 1. During a review of the facility's Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD-Document providing information on actual total direct care service hours provided to residents,) dated 11/1/2023 through 12/13/2023, the DHPPD indicated, the following dates the facility did not meet the required minimum Direct Care Service Hours of 3.5: 11/5/23, 11/11/23, 11/12/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly date and store food in refrigerators. This failure had the potential for food borne illnesses for the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/16/23 at 9:50 a.m. with the Dietary Staff (DS1), the following items in the facility refrigerator were observed not labeled and dated: Fish, bread buns and a box containing sandwiches, gelatin and fruit cups. DS1 confirmed the fish, bread buns and the box containing the sandwiches and gelatin were not labeled and dated. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/16/23 at 9:59 a.m. with DS1, the fruit juice cups in the kitchen refrigerator were observed with a use by date of July 19, 2023. DS1 confirmed the fruit caps had expired and should have been removed. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Leftover Foods, dated year 2023 (no month) the P&P indicated in part, 1. Storage of leftovers, a. label and date b. use refrigerated leftovers within 72 hours . During a review of the facility's P&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 2) was assessed and provided with the appropriate way to self-control the overbed light. This failure had the potential for Resident 2's needs not being met. Findings: During an observation and interview on 10/16/23 at 9:40 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER], with Resident 2, the switch of the overbed light was attached to the light panel away from resident's reach. Resident 2 verbalized she had to rely on the nurses to turn on and off the light as it can't be reached by self. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) Section C (assessment for mental status), dated 9/24/23, Resident 2's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status - 0 to 7 points: suggests severe mental impairment [memory problem], 8 to 12 points: suggests moderate mental impairment, 13 to 15 points: mental intactness) was 14. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 18 residents (Residents 3 and 67) Physician's order for do not resuscitate (DNR) were in the residents' medical records. This failure had the potential for residents to not receive their healthcare choices when they were no longer capable of making decisions for themselves. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 3's facesheet dated 10/17/23, the facesheet indicated, Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 3's Physician Order Summary Report, dated 8/30/23, the DNR order was not found in Resident 3's medical record. During a review of Resident 3's medical record, a Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST - medical order form that tells medical staff what to do if you have a medical emergency and are unable to speak for yourself) was observed. The POLST, dated 12/7/21, indicated, A. Do Not Attempt Resuscitation/DNR . B. Selective Treatment . C. No artificial means of Nutrition. The POLST…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Gastrostomy (GT- tube placed in the stomach for feeding, hydration or medicine) care was observed prior to medication administration and medications as prescribed by the attending physician were administered as ordered for 1 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 34) when: 1. GT placement was not checked prior to medication administration. This failure has the potential for the GT to be not be in the correct place which could result to medications and fluids administered going straight to the lungs causing pneumonia (lung infection). 2. Residual crushed medication was left in all 13 medication cups and not administered. This failure had the potential for the resident to not receive medications as ordered which could affect the resident's overall health. Findings: According to Nursing Made Incredibly Easy! 15(6):p 4, November/December 2017. | DOI: 10.1097/01.NME.0000525557.44656.04 ,in 2016, nursing was voted the most trusted profession…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the availability of the re-filled medication per physician's order for 1 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 34). This failure resulted in Resident 34 missing two doses of the prescribed medication and placed Resident 34's health and safety at risk. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's Order Summary Report, dated 10/17/23, the Order Summary Report indicated, a medication order for Resident 34, Carafate Oral Suspension (a liquid medication form used to treat or prevent ulcer or heart burn), give 10 ml (milliliter - unit of measurement) through a gastrostomy tube (GT - tube placed in the stomach for feeding, hydration or medicine) four times a day for Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD - stomach acid moves into the esophagus). During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/17/23 at 9 a.m. with the licensed nurse (LN 1), during morning med pass, LN 1 acknowledged, the unavailability of the Carafate medication. LN 1 further acknowledged, the medication was re-filled (request for additional) on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control practices (prevention of contamination with disease causing infection) when an open, unlabeled bottle of cleaning solution was found in the medication storage room. This failure had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms (germ) and increase the risk of infection for residents and staff. Findings: During an observation on 10/17/23 at 8:15 a.m. in the medication storage room, an open, unlabeled bottle of Hydrogen Peroxide 3% (three percent solution used for cleaning wounds) was found on a shelf next to clean, unused medications. During an interview on 10/18/23, at 8:10 a.m. with the treatment nurse (LN 5), LN 5 verbalized, all medications and supplies taken from the storage room are never returned to the shelf to maintain sanitary (clean) condition. During an interview on 10/17/23 at 8:20 a.m. with the Director of Nurses (DON), the DON acknowledged the open bottle of hydrogen peroxide solution, and verbalized, once the medication is opened, it must be removed from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician received notification of, or responded to, a resident's change of condition, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This facility failure had the potential for Resident 1 to receive inadequate care and treatment, post an unwitnessed fall with injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 8/23, the admission Record indicated in part, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was discharged from the facility on 8/15/23. During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated 8/15/23, the Notes indicated in part, Resident (Resident 1) was in the dining room . the tab alarm beeped a couple times . turned around quickly and found resident (Resident 1) lying on left side . Resident 1 had laceration on left eyebrow, that was bleeding . MD was notified. During an interview on 8/31/23 at 12:37 p.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN 2) and the Director of Nursing (DON 1), LN 2 verbalized sending Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete medical record for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 1) when monitoring of ordered Oxygen saturation (the amount of oxygen that's circulating in your blood) was not consistently documented in Resident 1 ' s Health Record. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive timely treatment if the oxygen saturation was low and for the resident to sustain complications. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Charting and Documentation, dated December 2022, the P&P indicated, The following information are examples of documentation that may be included in the resident medical record .C. Treatments or services performed . During a review of Resident 1 ' s Order Summary Report, dated 6/21/23, the order indicated, to monitor pulse oximetry q shift (check and record the oxygen level every shift) with order start date of 1/24/23. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Electronic Health Record (EHR), dated 2/23 through 7/23, the EHR indicated, the facility staff was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROVIDENCE GROUP NORTH LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/17/2016 |
| BUCKINGHAM, ROBERT | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 11/30/2023 |
| VANDERFORD, TEI | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 08/01/2022 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $670K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055861. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.