Western Slope Health Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 206 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 80.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 92.8 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.11 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free of accident hazards when Resident 1, who had an order to not be fed any food or water by mouth (NPO), was given a meal tray. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to choke evidenced by coughing, labored breathing, and low oxygen levels. He was subsequently transferred to the hospital and passed away. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and had a Gastrotomy Tube (G-Tube, a tube inserted through the stomach that brings nutrition, hydration, and medications). Review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, revealed an order dated 8/18/23 for NPO diet. Review of Resident 1's Nutritional Risk Assessment (Admission/Annual)-V 3.0, dated 8/18/23, the assessment indicated, Resident is strict NPO-nutrition through G-tube related to dysphagia from throat cancer. During a review of Resident 1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately assess, identify, monitor, and provide appropriate skin care and treatment for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when staff failed to recognize and address an ulcerated skin lesion on Resident 1's left wrist in a timely manner. This failure resulted that the wound became infested with multiple maggots and placed Resident 1 at risk for infection and worsening skin integrity. Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted on 3/24 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that causes memory loss and confusion) and a personal history of malignant skin cancer.A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool), dated 3/20/26, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4/15, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment.A review of the Nurse's Note, dated 5/24/26 at 11:29 p.m. signed by Licensed Nurse (LN) 4, indicated that the nurse observed a soiled bandage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when:1. There were food debris on shelves with clean and ready-to-use sheet pans,2. A container in the clean and ready-to-use storage area was stacked wet,3. Two small cups of yogurt were stored in the refrigerator uncovered and,4. The microwave for residents' food was not clean.These failures had potential to cause food-borne illnesses in a highly susceptible population of 91 out of 91 residents who received food from the kitchen.Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/3/26 at 8:11 a.m. with Dietary Supervisor (DS) at the kitchen's initial tour, food debris were observed on the shelves that stored clean and ready-to-use sheet pans. DS confirmed there were food debris on the shelves and acknowledged the area should have been kept clean and free from food debris. During an interview on 3/5/26 at 11:05 a.m. with Registered Dietician (RD), RD acknowledged the risk for foodborne illness…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nonpharmacological interventions were implemented for two residents (Resident 3 and Resident 4) of 24 sampled residents, when target behavior and side effect monitoring were not performed for Resident 3's and Resident 4's psychotropic medications. These failures had the potential to result in unnecessary medication for Residents 3 and 4 and an increased risk and exposure to side effects associated with psychotropic medications such as sedation, memory loss, falls, abnormal involuntary movements, and death.Findings: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in January 2026 with diagnoses with included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD, symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares, severe anxiety and uncontrollable thoughts about the event). A review of Resident 3's medical record (MR) indicated a physician's order for the following: - Quetiapine (a psychotropic medication, drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) 100 milligrams (mg, a unit of measurement), give 1 tablet at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability and effective documentation of controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse or addiction), when:Random controlled medication audits for two out of four residents (Resident 5, and Resident 19) were not reconciled. The medications were documented in the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but were not documented accurately on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to indicate they were given to the residents; and,Resident 12's controlled medication was observed as given but was not reconciled in CDR at the time of medication administration.These failures resulted in the facility not having accurate accountability of controlled medications and potential for abuse or misuse of these medications, and the potential for not meeting the residents' therapeutic needs or worsening of their medical conditions.Findings: 1. Resident 5 had a physician's order dated 2/28/26 for Oxycodone HCL (hydrochloride)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were implemented when:Resident 58's nebulizer mask (neb mask-a face mask that fits over the nose and mouth to deliver medication into the lungs) and CPAP mask (continuous positive airway pressure-a breathing machine designed to increase air pressure, keeping the airway open when the person breathes in) and Resident 64's nebulizer mask were not stored in antimicrobial bag and Resident 64's oxygen tubing was on the floor.Meal trays, with uncovered salad, were transported to residents' rooms. Resident 12's foley catheter (a device that drains urine from the bladder) drainage bag was touching the floor. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - healthcare workers wear gloves and a gown during certain care activities to stop germs from spreading between residents) not followed during wound care for Resident 1. These failures had the potential to compromise resident's health and safety, and potentially lead…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary assistance with nail care and hand hygiene for one out of 24 sampled residents (Resident 11).This failure to maintain clean and trimmed fingernails may increase the risk of infection.Findings:During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure (the lungs cannot do their job well enough to keep the body alive and functioning properly) with hypoxia (body or brain is not getting enough oxygen); Morbid Obesity (a person has so much extra body weight that it seriously affects their health and increases the risk of life-threatening medical problems).A review of Resident 11's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 1/22/26, indicated, Resident 11 needs maximal assistance (Helper does more than half the effort) for personal hygiene.During an observation on 3/3/26 at 9 a.m. in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1 was free from significant medication error when Resident 1 did not receive prescribed antiarrhythmic medication (treat and prevent irregular heartbeats) in accordance with the physician's order.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 to have experienced irregular heartbeats and other unnecessary side effects which could have negatively affected Resident 1's health.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with multiple diagnoses which included paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (fast, irregular heartbeat that comes and goes) and unspecified atrial flutter (abnormal heart rhythm that's too fast). A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 1/29/25, indicated Resident 1 had intact cognition.A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, with start date 1/25/25, indicated, Amiodarone HCl [medication to treat and prevent irregular heartbeats] Oral Tablet 200 MG [milligrams-unit of measurement] Give 200 mg by mouth one time a day for AFIB [atrial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely store foods according to professional practice standards for a census of 90 residents when: 1. Potentially Hazardous Food (PHF) such as unpasteurized eggs, cheese, half and half, turkey, and ham was left unattended on the floor and shelving outside of the kitchen refrigerator for longer than two hours; 2. Expired banana pudding was found in the kitchen refrigerator available for use; and, 3. Twelve individual containers of salad dressing were stored unlabeled and undated in the kitchen refrigerator available for use. These failures had the potential to cause a widespread foodborne illness among residents from consumption of contaminated, spoiled or unlabeled foods. Findings: 1. During a concurrent initial kitchen observation and interview on 12/2/24 at 8:46 a.m. with [NAME] (CK) in front of the walk-in refrigerator in the kitchen, there were boxes of unpasteurized eggs, cheese, half and half, turkey, and ham observed left unattended on the floor and shelving. CK verified the words Keep Refrigerated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for two of 23 sampled residents (Resident 94 and Resident 6) when: 1. Anti-anxiety medication was given without first offering nonpharmacological interventions for Resident 94, and 2. Bladder scan was not completed for Resident 6. These failures placed Resident 94 at risk for unnecessary medication and increased the risk for Resident 6 for unmet care needs. Findings: 1. Resident 94 was admitted to the facility in late 2024 with diagnoses which included nerve pain, generalized anxiety and difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event. During a review of Resident 94's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 11/26/24, the MDS indicated Resident 94 was able to independently make decisions regarding tasks of daily life without memory impairment. During a review of Resident 94's Clinical Physician Orders, the physician order indicated, Lorazepam [an anti-anxiety medication] Oral Tablet 0.5MG…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure opened medications were dated and properly stored for two residents (Resident 31 and Resident 16) for a census of 90. This failure had the potential for residents to receive medications with unsafe or reduced potency from improper storage for Resident 16 or being used past their expiration date for Resident 31. Findings: During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 9:32 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON) in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER], an opened Ozempic (a medication used to treat Type 2 Diabetes) injection pen for Resident 31 was observed to be stored inside a resealable bag without a written opened date on the label. There was another open Ozempic injection pen for Resident 16 in the resealable bag without a pen cap to cover the pen window where the needle was attached. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:30 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 5 (LN 5), LN 5 stated the importance of dating and labeling Ozempic when opened to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,412 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,412 — penalty dated 2023-09-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $829K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA