Pleasant Hill Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 396 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 114 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.88 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 51 beds and averages 48.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-08-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for six of 47 sampled residents (Resident 2, 4, 9, 16, 64, and 68), the facility failed to inform and provide information to the resident and/or resident representatives, the option to formulate an Advance Directive (AD, a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity). This deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed treatment directions to healthcare providers regarding residents' medical care. 1. A review of Resident 2's admission Record, printed on 8/14/25, indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (muscle weakness on one side of the body, complete paralysis) and hemiparesis (partial weakness), atrial fibrillation, (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that causes poor blood flow), and diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar). 2. A review of Resident 4's admission Record,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to meet professional standards of quality for three of three sampled residents (Residents 64, 34, and 67) when the following were observed:1. Resident 64's Fiber source enteral feeding bag (food given through a feeding tube) and tubing were not labeled.2. Resident 34's Intravenous (IV - small flexible tube used to deliver medicine/fluids into a person's vein) secured by tegaderm (clear, waterproof medical device to secure IV line to a person's skin) was not labeled.3. Resident 67's IV line and tubing was not labeled.This failure had the potential to negatively impact the delivery of care services provided to Residents 64, 34 and 67.1. During a review of Resident 64's admission Record, printed on 8/15/25, indicated Resident 64 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included malnutrition and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).During a review of Resident 64's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was below five percent (%) when:1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 administered three antihypertensive (medication to treat high blood pressure) medications to Resident 72 without checking vital signs prior to administering the medications.2. LVN 1 administered topical medication to Resident 45 without doctor's order.These deficient practices placed Residents 72 and 45 at risk of developing complications and adverse reaction related to error in medication administration. 1. During concurrent medication administration observation and interview on 8/14/25, at 9:18 a.m. with LVN 2, LVN 2 was doing morning medication pass. LVN 2 administered Bumetanide 2mg 1 tablet, Carvedilol 6.25mg 1 tablet, and Losartan 100mg 1 tablet by mouth to Resident 72 without checking vital signs.LVN 2 stated she did not check Resident 72's vital signs because she relied on Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA - unlicensed direct care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident of 27 (Resident 72) sampled residents observed during medication administration pass was free from significant medication error when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 administered the following medications without checking Resident 72's vital signs (clinical measurements that tells the state of essential body functions).1. Bumetanide (a powerful water-pill that can lower blood pressure) 2 milligrams (mg - unit of measurement)2. Carvedilol (antihypertensive - medication to treat high blood pressure)3. Losartan (antihypertensive- to treat high blood pressure)This deficient practice had the potential for dangerous drop in blood pressure, possible for stroke and increased risk of death.During a review of Resident 72's admission record printed on 8/14/25, indicated Resident 72 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included essential primary hypertension…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a safe and sanitary manner when:1. Two dietary staff members did not have their hair fully covered with a hairnet. 2. Plate covers and plate bases used were worn out and damaged. 3. A ladle spoon was found stored dirty and in poor condition. 4. Kitchen storage cabinet doors for storing food and cooking equipment were either missing or in poor condition. These failures had the potential to result in contamination of food and foodborne illness for 46 residents who received food from the kitchen out of a facility census of 47. 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/13/25, at 12:40 p.m., with [NAME] 1 and Dietary Aide 1, both dietary staff members did not have their hair fully secured with a hairnet. [NAME] 1's hair to the back of her neck was not fully covered with the hairnet. Dietary Aide 1 was also noted with some hair to both sides of her neck that were not fully secured to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-15 · tag F0813 — pattern
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's food items brought from outside and stored in the residents' refrigerator located in the Conference Room, were labeled and stored appropriately for one of 47 sampled residents (Resident 19).These failures had the potential to cause food contamination and foodborne illnesses.A review of Resident 19's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to provide care), dated 6/13/25, indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a therapeutic diet (a meal plan) order.During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review, on 8/13/25, at 3:15 p.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP) and Dietary manager (DM), in the conference room, contents of the facility's refrigerator and freezer designated for residents' food brought from outside were checked. Items found were Resident 19's liquid food Items that were stored in the refrigerator, with no received date, open date, use-by date, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices when following were noted:1. Doors of four out of five sampled rooms designated for COVID-19 (a disease caused by coronavirus that spreads through the air when an infected person coughs, sneezes, or talks. It can cause fever, cough, tiredness, and trouble breathing, and can be more serious in older adults or people with health problems) residents were left open.2. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not perform hand hygiene after touching resident care areas and prior to serving food to Resident 51.3. Resident 57 did not have hand hygiene supplies readily available and within easy reach, to clean his hands after coughing up phlegm (yellow thick mucus).4. Oxygen tubing (a clear flexible hose that delivers oxygen from tank) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 16) was not labeled and was kept off the floor. 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/12/25, at 11:50 a.m., with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0573 — isolated
  Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of one sampled resident (Resident 63), the facility failed to ensure Resident 63 was allowed to obtain a copy of his requested medical records within the required time frame.This failure resulted in Resident 63's undue concern and anxiety pertaining to obtaining the requested medical records and contact number of his former physician.A review of Resident 63's admission Record, printed on 8/14/24, indicated that resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to home upon completion of care on 4/16/23. A review of Resident 63's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to provide care) dated 3/15/23, indicated resident was understood, able to understand others, and had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool for a resident's orientation to time, and capacity to remember. The BIMS score ranges from 0-15, with 15 as an indication of intact skills) score of 15. A review of Resident 63's letter of request for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the tracking entry Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool) within seven calendar days after re-entry for one of 47 sampled residents (Resident 64). This failure had the potential to delay care planning and delivery for Resident 64's care areas that would have been identified in the re-entry MDS.During a review of Resident 64's admission Record, printed on 8/15/25, indicated Resident 64 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage (caused by complete lack of oxygen to the brain), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (lung condition where lungs cannot provide enough oxygen to the body), malnutrition, contracture (stiff joint/body part and unable to move normally) of left and right knee, and personal history of malignant neoplasm of breast (breast cancer).During a review of Resident 64's Nursing Home and Swing Bed Tracking (NT/ST) MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of 47 sampled residents (Resident 64), the facility failed to complete the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool) assessments. This failure had the potential to result in the delayed assessment of resident needs, goals of care and inability to monitor each resident's progress over time.During a review of Resident 64's admission Record, printed on 8/15/25, indicated Resident 64 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage (caused by complete lack of oxygen to the brain), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (lung condition where lungs cannot provide enough oxygen to the body), malnutrition, contracture (stiff joint/body part and unable to move normally) of left and right knee, and personal history of malignant neoplasm of breast (breast cancer).During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/15/25 at 12:11 p.m. with Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $843K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA