Sierra Valley Rehab Center
301 West Putnam, Porterville, CA 93257 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 139 certified beds · (559) 784-7375 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,190 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-25)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.4% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.6% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.2% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.3% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.4% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.83 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.42 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 130 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 59.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.9%CMS range 39.0–55.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 7.6–13.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 59.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 53.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 4.5–10.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.33 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 139 beds and averages 126.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
62 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement comprehensive person-centered care plan for activities of a daily living (ADL) when Hoyer (mechanical, device used to safely lift and transfer patients who have limited mobility) lift was not used to transfer one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from wheelchair to bed. This failure resulted in Resident 1 falling multiple times and sustaining two broken bones in each lower leg, requiring an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF, surgical procedure to repair broken bones that may include use of screws, rods, or plates) of the left upper tibia and lateral tibial plateau plate (shin bone). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 10/08/22, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was a readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses of difficulty in walking, and muscle wasting in right and left lower legs, difficulty in walking, generalized muscle weakness, other- lack of coordination, abnormality of gait…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in a delay of care.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Physician Progress Note (PN)'s dated 7/17/25 at 5 p.m., the PN indicated, Assessment/Plan.Recommend checking UA (urinalysis-analyzes a sample of urine to detect and measure various substances and conditions) given chronic indwelling catheter and history of UTIs (urinary tract infections) with presence of spasms - discussed with nursing on date of service.During a review of the Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 7/23/25, the OSR indicated there was no order for a UA on 7/17/25.During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/4/25 at 1:01 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 1's Progress Notes were reviewed. LVN 1 stated she was assigned to Resident 1 on 7/17/25 when the physician ordered the UA and she did not enter the physician order.During an interview on 8/4/25 at 2:10 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated when the physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the binding Arbitration Agreement (a contract that requires parties to resolve disputes outside of court) was written in a form and manner resident could understand for three of three sampled residents (Resident 44, Resident 70, and Resident 329). This failure had the potential for Resident 44, Resident 70, and Resident 329 to sign the Arbitration Agreement without understanding the implications. Findings: During a review of the facility's ARBITRATION AGREEMENT (AA), 1/20/22, the AA indicated, The Resident and/or Resident's agent certifies that he/she has read this Agreement and has been given a copy of this Agreement, and affirmatively represents that he/she is duly authorized by virtue of the Resident's consent, instruction, and/or durable power of attorney, to execute this Agreement and accept its terms. During a review of Resident 44's admission RECORD (AR), dated 2/26/25, the AR indicated, Primary [NAME]. [language] Spanish. During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of practice for infection control when: 1. One of one sampled resident (Resident 42) presented with signs and symptoms of a cough and treated with Influenza (flu-a contagious respiratory virus) medication was not put in Droplet Isolation Precautions (Isolation for residents with contagious respiratory symptoms requiring resident to be isolated and staff/visitors to wear a gown, gloves, and a mask. 2. Two of two sample residents (Resident 4 and Resident 42) requiring oxygen, did not have the tubing on their oxygen and nebulizer machine dated and timed and oxygen tubing found on the floor uncovered. 3. One of one resident (Resident 229) requiring portable suction machine [used to clear secretions from resident mouth and throat], did not having the tubing and canister dated or timed and the suction tip of the machine was left at bedside uncovered. 4. One of one sampled resident (Resident 86) was provided hand hygiene before being served lunch. These failures had the potential to result in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0920 — patternProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the dining room was accessible and had space to accommodate the 132 Residents who reside at the facility. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the resident's social interaction, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/24/25 at 12:13 p.m. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) in the dining room, the dining room door was closed and had a coded lock. There were seven round tables. There was a seating chart on the wall that listed where 15 residents would sit. Eight residents were waiting for lunch to be served. ADON stated they usually have around eight residents in the dining room at one time. ADON stated the facility does not have the space for more than eight reisents at one time in the dining room. ADON stated the residents wait in the hallway until the other residents finish their meal and leave the dining room before they enter the dining room for their meal. ADON stated the coded lock on the door is to ensure only staff can open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete MDS (Minimum Data Set- A tool used to collect data to establish person-centered care needs) for one of 55 sampled residents (Resident 47). This failure had the potential for Resident 47 to not receive care based on his specific needs. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/25/25 at 2:50 p.m. with MDS consultant (MDSC) and MDS nurse (MDSN), Resident 47's, MDS-Section N-Medications (MDS-N), dated 1/6/25, and Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 2/2025 were reviewed. MDSN was unable to provide documentation Resident 47 was on anticoagulant medications (delay blood clot formation). MDSC stated Resident 47 was prescribed Aspirin (helps prevent blood clots) which should not have been coded as an anticoagulant on the MDS. MDSN stated, It [coding Aspirin as an anticoagulant medication] was a mistake on my part. During a review of Center for Medicare and Medi-Cal (CMS) Resident Assessment Instructions (RAI) Manual Version 3.0 for MDS (CMS RAI), [undated], the CMS RAI indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, for one of 55 sampled residents (Resident 329) when communication interventions were not developed and implemented. This failure had the potential for Resident 329's communication and care needs to not be met. Findings: During a review of Resident 329's Care Plan Report (CPR), dated [DATE], the CPR indicated, Communication: [Resident 329] is at risk for impaired communication related to primary language is Spanish. Goal.Will be able to make needs known. Will have needs met. Will have no declines in communication.Interventions [none]. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:30 p.m. with Resident 329, Resident 329 stated she was Spanish speaking only. Resident 329 stated at times English speaking staff did not understand her and she does not understand English. Resident 329 stated staff use an interpreter when they communicated with her. Resident 329 stated the staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow medication orders for one of 13 residents (Resident 76). These failures had the potential for Resident 76 to not receive the full effect of the medication. Findings: During an observation on 2/26/25 at 2:20 p.m. in the doorway of Resident 76's room, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 9 was preparing to administer medication to Resident 76. LVN 9 removed a package of Potassium Chloride tablets (medicine to treat or prevent low blood levels of potassium) ER (extended release) 20 MEQ [milliequivalent- unit of measure] from her medication cart and compared the medication package with Resident 76's Medication Administration Record (MAR). LVN 9 removed two Potassium Chloride ER 20 MEQ tablets from the medication package. LVN 9 crushed the two tablets of Potassium Chloride ER 20 MEQ. LVN 9 placed the crushed Potassium Chloride tablets in a small cup of apple sauce. LVN 9 fed Resident 76 the apple sauce with the crushed Potassium Chloride ER 20 MEQ tablets. During a concurrent interview and record review on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Physician Orders, Accepting, Transcribing, Carrying Out and Implementing (Noting), for one of two sampled residents (Resident 126) when Resident 126's wound treatment orders were not implemented. This failure resulted wound care not being provided for Resident 126's right heel blister which had the potential for development of infection and delayed wound healing. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/27/25 at 11:26 a.m. with Registered Nurse Consultant (RNC) 1, Resident 126's SBAR [Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation] Communication Form and Progress Note for RNs [Registered Nurse]/LPN [Licensed Practice Nurse]/LVNs [Licensed Vocational Nurse] (SBAR), dated 2/19/25 was reviewed. The SBAR indicated, Resident 126 developed a right heel blister, the primary care clinician was notified and a wound treatment was ordered on 2/19/25. The SBAR indicated, Cleanse [right heel blister] with NS [Normal Saline - irrigating fluid], pat dry, paint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide hearing aids for one of one sampled resident (Resident 22). This failure had the potential to affect Resident 22's quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's Initial ENT (Ears, Nose, Throat) Consultant (IENTC), dated 6/11/24, the IENTC indicated, REASON FOR VISIT.#2 Difficulty Hearing. #6 Stuffy Ears. REFERRALS. Audiogram [test for hearing loss] Recommended: Yes - Hearing abnormal by observation and patient also c/o [complain of] hearing problems. During a review of Resident 22's Audiogram, dated 7/10/24, the Audiogram indicated, Qualified Hearing Loss for Hearing Aids: Y [yes]. Eligibility: Y. Recommendation: Hearing Aids. Notes: The patient [Resident 22] has hearing loss significant enough to qualify for hearing aids. The patient has a greater hearing loss at higher frequencies in the right ear, meaning the patient has greater difficulty discriminating between different sounds during conversation and hearing higher-pitched voices and sounds. During an interview on 2/24/25 at 12 p.m. with Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Administration Set/Tubing Changes for one of one sampled resident (Resident 329). This failure had the potential to place Resident 329 at risk for infection. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 in Resident 329's room, Resident 329's Intravenous (IV-flexible tube is inserted into a vein to administer fluids, medications, or blood products directly into the bloodstream) tubing was not labeled. LVN 1 stated the IV tubing should have been labeled with date and time of when the IV tubing was hung and the initials of who hung the IV tubing. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Administration Set/Tubing Changes, dated February 2023, the P&P indicated, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for aseptic administration set changes in order to prevent infections associated with contaminated IV therapy equipment. General Guidelines. 4. Label tubing with date, time and initials. If facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 51 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure annual competencies were completed for one of five sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) 1. This failure had the potential for CNA 1 to not be competent when providing care to residents. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/26/25 at 3:47 p.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), CNA 1's Employee Orientation Checklist (EOC), undated was reviewed. The EOC indicated, CNA 1 date of hire was 12/26/23. CNA 1's new employee orientation began on 12/26/23 and was completed on 12/27/23. CNA 1's Nurse Assistant Competency Checklist (NACC), [undated] was reviewed. The NACC indicated, CNA 1 had completed the competency checklist on 12/27/23. DSD was unable to provide a 2024 annual competency for CNA 1. DSD stated CNA 1 did not have a current annual competency completed as required. Policy requested from facility and was not provided.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Food Preparation, for one of one cooks (Cook 1) when [NAME] 1 did not measure recipe ingredients. This failure had the potential for residents' nutritional needs to not be met. Findings: During a review of the facility's RECIPE: ZESTY SPINACH, (RZS) dated 2/24/25, the RZS indicated, add 1 tsp to 1 1/2 tsp of garlic powder, add 1/4 tsp to 3/4 tsp of salt, and add 1/2 tsp to 1 tsp of red pepper flakes. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/25/25 at 9:14 a.m. with [NAME] 1, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), and Registered Dietician (RD), in the kitchen, [NAME] 1 was preparing spinach to be pureed. [NAME] 1 poured all the pureed spinach into a larger dish then added unmeasured amounts of garlic powder, iodized salt, chili powder, and melted butter into the spinach. [NAME] 1 stated she does not use the recipe, she went by taste. [NAME] 1 stated she should have measured the seasoning as listed in the RZS. During an interview on 2/25/25 at 3:17 p.m. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistive feeding devices were available for one of one sampled resident (Resident 72). This failure had the potential to prevent Resident 72 from maintaining or improving his independence in self-feeding skills when consuming meals and snacks. Findings: During a review of Resident 72's admission Record (AR), dated 2/27/25, the AR indicated, Resident 72 was readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis hemiplegia (inability to move one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke resulting in blockage in the blood vessels supplying blood to the brain) affecting right dominate side. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/24/25 at 1:34 p.m. with Resident 72 in Resident 72's room, Resident 72's lunch tray had a cup of tea with one handle, four small bowls containing pureed food, and two regular eating spoons. Resident 72's meal ticket was reviewed. The meal ticket indicated ADAP [adaptive] Equip [equipment] 2 Handle sip…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed implement its Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Smoking, for one of 21 Residents (Resident 4) when tobacco was at the bedside, a smoking care plan and smoking assessment were not completed. These failures had the potential to place residents, visitors, and staff at risk for injury/harm due to potential unsafe smoking practices and access to tobacco. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/25/25 at 11:31 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 in Resident 4's room, Resident 4 had a can of tobacco at the bedside. LVN 4 stated the tobacco should be locked up and not left at the bedside. During an interview on 2/26/25 at 11:18 a.m. with Activities Assistant (AA), AA stated, If [Resident 4] had full access to his chewing tobacco he will use too much .It is supposed to be locked up. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/27/25 at 11:52 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 4's, clinical record was reviewed. DON was stated there was no tobacco use care plan or safe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from verbal abuse inflicted by his roommate (Resident 2). This failure resulted in Resident 1 being agitated, noisy, restless and the inability to sleep with the potential for psychosocial harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], the MDS indicated, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS).05 (severe cognitive impairment). During a review of Resident 2's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated, BIMS.13 (cognition is intact). During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 3/3/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] and had the following diagnoses.quadriplegia c-1-c-4 complete (spinal cord injury resulting in total paralysis of both arms and legs), dysphasia (condition that affects the ability to understand, use, or produce language) following cerebral infarction (lack of oxygen causing an area of dead tissue in the brain). During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when verbal abuse was not reported to the Administrator. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing persistent verbal abuse from his roommate (Resident 2). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], the MDS indicated, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS).05 (severe cognitive impairment). During a review of Resident 2's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated, BIMS.13 (cognition is intact). During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 3/3/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] and had the following diagnoses.quadriplegia c-1-c-4 complete (spinal cord injury resulting in total paralysis of both arms and legs), dysphasia (condition that affects the ability to understand, use, or produce language) following cerebral infarction (lack of oxygen causing an area of necrotic tissue in the brain). During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure when a resident-to-resident allegation of abuse was not reported to California Department of Public Health (CDPH-state agency) per facility policy and procedure for two of two sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 5). This failure resulted in the allegation of abuse not being reported to CDPH timely. Findings: During a review of the Initial Facility Reported Event (IFRE), (undated), the IFRE indicated, Date/Time Reported: 12/16/24 approx. (approximately) 5 p.m. CDPH.Obtained knowledge 12/16/24 of incident on 12/14/24 at approx. 5:44 p.m. (approximately 48 hours prior to the abuse being reported) .Type of Incident. resident-to-resident physical contact.An incident of resident-to-resident mistreatment occurred between (Resident 5) and (Resident 4). Per staff witness, both residents were initially arguing when (Resident 4) kicked (Resident 5). During a review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS-resident assessment tool) dated 12/8/24, the MDS indicated, Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was followed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) when the mesh stop sign on Resident 3's door was not in use. This failure had the potential for residents to wander into Resident 3's room. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's Care Plan (CP), (undated), the CP indicated, 12/3/24 Alleged receiver of inappropriate touching from another resident.Interventions/Tasks.Place a bright colored stop sign at the entrance to deter wandering residents. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/30/24 at 3:29 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 in the hallway, the mesh stop sign on Resident 3's door was not in use. CNA 1 confirmed the findings and stated the mesh stop sign was used to keep wandering resident's out of Resident 3's room and it should have been in use. During an interview on 12/30/24 at 3:45 p.m. with Social Service Director (SSD), SSD stated Resident 3's stop sign should always be used to deter the wandering residents from entering the room. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician orders were implemented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure resulted in Resident 3 not receiving the medication as ordered by the physician and had the potential for adverse health outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's Physician's Orders (PO), dated 12/11/24, the PO indicated, 12/11/24 Increase Xanax (medication used to treat anxiety) 1mg (milligram-a unit of measurement) TID (three times a day). During a review of Resident 3's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 12/30/24, the OSR indicated, Resident 3 had a physician order for Alprazolam (also known as Xanax) oral tablet 1 mg give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day.start date 10/24/24. During a review of Resident 3's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 12/24, the MAR indicated, Alprazolam.1 mg. two times a day was being administered daily. During an interview on 12/30/24 at 2:34 p.m. with Social Service Director (SSD), SSD stated she was the one who received Resident 3's PO from the psychologist. SSD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled staff Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN 1) competencies were completed. This failure had the potential for LVN 1 to be incompetent when providing care for the residents'. Findings: During a review of LVN 1's L.V.N. Competency Skills Checklist (LVNCSC) (undated), the LVNCSC indicated, Competency 2.Communicates effectively in professional relationships.Competency 3.Utilizes the nursing process in providing nursing care to residents.Competency 5.Provides nursing care based on scientific principles and sound theoretical knowledge.Competency 6.Demonstrates knowledge of emergency procedures.Competency 7.Demonstrates knowledge of unit rounds and nursing documentation.Competency 8.Transcribes and administers medications according to policy and procedures.Competency 9.Demonstrates knowledge of principles of Pain Management Program.Competency 10.Demonstrates knowledge of discharge process.Competency 11.Verbalizes the importance of acting as a resident advocate.Competency 12.Verbalizes accountability for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was documented when administered for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1's medical record to be inaccurate. Findings: During an interview on 12/16/24 at 1:05 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated she does not receive her medications that are scheduled at 6 a.m. on time. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/30/24 at 2:30 p.m. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) 2, Resident 2's Administration History (AH), dated 12/30/24 was reviewed. The AH indicated, Levothyroxine Sodium (thyroid medication) oral tablet 150 mcg (micrograms-a unit of measurement) .scheduled for 6 am on 12/9/24. The AH indicated, Administration by (ADON 2) .Documented 12/19/24 (10 days after administration) 1:19 p.m. ADON 2 stated she administered Resident 2's Levothyroxine Sodium on 12/9 (no time given) but did not document it until 12/19. ADON 2 stated when the medication was administered it should have been documented as soon as it was given. During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional interventions were implemented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have unmet nutritional needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Nutritional Risk Assessment (NRA), dated 9/6/24, the NRA indicated, Recommendations.recommend to add boost (nutritional supplement) 4oz (ounce-unit of measurement) QD (every day) prostat (protein supplement) 30ml (milliliters-unit of measurement), zinc (mineral supplement), and vitamin C (supplement). During a concurrent interview and record review, on 10/1/24 at 11:44 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1 ' s clinical record was reviewed. DON was unable to provide evidence of the nutritional recommendations being implemented. DON stated the nutritional recommendations were not carried out and they should have been addressed within 72 hours. During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Nutritional Screening/Assessments/Resident Care Plan dated 2023, the P&P indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was implemented for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was not provided a bed alarm (device that alerts staff when a resident gets out of bed). This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for falls resulting in injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP) , dated 5/16/17, the CP indicated, [Resident 1] is at risk for falls with or without injury related to poor safety awareness. Interventions: Bed alarm, ensure in proper working order, answer promptly. During an observation on 7/19/24 at 11:30 a.m. in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 did not have a bed alarm on his bed. During an interview on 7/19/24 at 12:35 p.m. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), ADON stated Resident 1 is at risk for falls. ADON stated, [Resident 1] will hang his feet on the side of the bed. He will attempt to transfer. During an interview on 7/19/24 at 12:39 p.m. with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), MDSC stated, [Resident 1] tries to get out of bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for one of six sampled residents (Resident 5). This failure had the potential for Resident 5 to be unable to call for help and his needs not being met. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/24/24 at 11:46 a.m. with Resident 5 in Resident 5's room, Resident 5 was lying in bed and his call light was hanging on the wall behind his bedside drawer. Resident 5 stated he cannot find his call light. He stated, Where is it [call light]? During an interview on 7/24/24 at 11:50 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2, CNA 2 stated Resident 5's call light was not within his reach. CNA 2 stated Resident 5's call light should have been placed within his reach. During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool), dated 5/17/24, the MDS indicated Resident 5 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 7 (score of 0-7 means severe cognitive impairment). The MDS indicated Resident 5's both lower extremities have limitation that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of four sampled residents (Resident 103, Resident 281, and Resident 49) dialysis (procedure to mechanically remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) assessments were completed. This failure had the potential for dialysis related complications to occur/worsening of residents health condition. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/29/24 at 9:46 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, in Resident 103's room, Resident 103 was not in his room. LVN 1 stated Resident 103 was at dialysis. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/30/24 at 10:07 a.m. with Resident 103, in Resident 103's room, Resident 103 stated he goes for dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Resident 103 pointed to an area on his upper right arm where an AV fistula (connection made between an artery and a vein for dialysis access) could be seen. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/1/24 at 9:54 a.m. with Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a system to demonstrate nursing competencies for licensed nursing staff. This failure had the potential to result in nursing staff not being competently skilled to meet the care needs of the facility's residents. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review of personnel files on 2/1/24 at 3:47 p.m. with Staff Development Designee (SDD) and Consultant 1, Licensed Nurse Skills Inventory lists were reviewed, and the following were noted: Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6's skills inventory was signed off as completed by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/17/24. LVN 1's skills inventory was signed off as completed by the DON on 1/28/24. LVN 7's skills inventory was signed off and completed by the DON on 3/31/21. The skills lists did not indicate if competency was shown by a return demonstration, or by pre- or post-testing. SDD stated the skills lists are done on hire and annually. The Licensed Nurse Skills Inventory indicated Prepare, administer and record medications and treatments- see separate MED…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to discontinue Seroquel (a psychotropic medication used to treat mental disorders that affect a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 95) when the physician agreed with the pharmacist's recommendation to discontinue the medication. This failure resulted in Resident 95 receiving a mind-altering medication unnecessarily for 89 days. Findings: During a review of Resident 95's Consultant Pharmacist's Recommendation To Inter-Disciplinary Team (CPRIDT), dated [DATE], the CPRIDT indicated, This resident is currently administered Seroquel 25 mg [milligram-metric unit of weight] qhs [every evening] . since [DATE]. Since last review, behaviors have declined quite a bit. Her anxiety [feelings of worry] behaviors have also decreased. I defer it to your opinion if we may . D/C [Discontinue] Seroquel (dose at 25mg is more sedative [causing sleep] than anything else). Resident 95's physician circled the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize the Registered Dietitian(s) (RD) expertise and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services when: 1. The RD documented imposed limitations of allowed hours the RD had at the facility impeded the following: timely weight reviews for residents, timely admission nutrition assessments for residents (Resident 18 and Resident 23), and inconsistent ability to conduct a monthly kitchen inspection to provide oversight over food safety, sanitation, evaluation of menus and therapeutic diets and lack of nutritional products/resources to offer choices to residents, when needed. 2. The RD was not incorporated into the IDT (interdisciplinary) weight review (care planning for weight change), in a timely manner, to address Resident's 10 significant weight loss. 3. The facility did not ensure the RD's skills sets were sufficiently incorporated into the facility's quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) by the facility not requiring the participation of the RD during the QAPI meetings. These…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0840 — patternEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the contract for Registered Dietitian (RD) services included clear guidelines for the development of action plans, prompt implementation and monitoring of the Registered Dietitian's recommendations to address the nutritional needs of the residents. This failure resulted in an untimely RD assessment for Resident 10, and had the potential for delay in identifying and addressing other residents' nutritional needs in a timely manner. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/1/24 at 12:24 p.m. with Administrator and Corporate Consultant (CC), RD's Nutrition Consultant Report (NCR), dated 11/9/23 to 1/12/24 were reviewed. The NCR's indicated, concerns with insufficient time to work on QAPI (quality assurance performance improvement-committee that addresses quality concerns), monthly kitchen inspections being missed, incomplete reviews of monthly weights, and not an adequate amount of time to meet the required comprehensive admission nutrition assessments in a timely manner for residents.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 53) was assessed by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) for his ability to safely self-administer medication Cough Drops Mouth/Throat Lozenge 5.8 MG [milligrams-metric unit of weight]. This failure had the potential to adversely affect Resident 53's health condition. Findings: During an observation on 1/29/24 at 9:55 a.m. in Resident 53's room, Resident 53 was in his bed with his eyes closed and cough drops were on his bedside table. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/29/24 at 10:03 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 in Resident 53's room, LVN 2 pointed to the bedside table with a locked drawer. LVN 2 stated the cough drops should have been locked up in the drawer. LVN 2 stated Resident 53 should have had a care plan, an assessment, and an order for the cough drops before he was permitted to keep them at the bedside. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/1/24 at 5:41 p.m. with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 53's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 50 sampled residents (Resident 119) and her Responsible Party (RP) were provided a copy of the baseline care plan (BCP). This failure had the potential for Resident 119 and her RP to be unaware of her plan of care. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/1/24 at 1:58 p.m. with Medical Records (MR) staff, Resident 119's BCP, dated 1/4/24 was reviewed. MR staff stated Resident 119 had an incomplete BCP because there was no indication a printed copy of the BCP was given to Resident 119 or Resident 119's RP. MR staff stated she reviewed Resident 119's clinical record and there was no documentation that a printed copy of the BCP was given. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Plans-Baseline, dated 2022, the P&P indicated, 1. The baseline care plan should include instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident.4. The resident and/or representative should be provided a written summary of the baseline care plan.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for 1 of 50 sampled residents (Resident 18) when the facility continued to offer an oral nutrition supplement (ONS) after Resident 18 expressed dislike of the ONS. This failure had the potential to result in further significant weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 18's Weights and Vitals Summary (WVS), the WVS indicated the following weights: 8/1/23 - 151 pounds (lbs) 9/5/23 - 144 lbs 10/3/23 - 142 lbs 11/7/23 - 142 lbs 12/27/23 - 132 lbs 1/23/24 - 135 lbs During a review of Resident 18's WVS, the WVS indicated from 8/1/23 to 1/23/24, she had a significant weight changed of 16 lbs/10.6 %. During a review of Resident 18's Order Listing Report(OLR), dated 8/11/23, the OLR indicated, Boost Glucose Control Oral Liquid (Nutritional Supplements) Give 4 ml [milliliter-unit of volume] by mouth two times a day for supplement give after meals. During a review of Resident 18's IDT [interdisciplinary team] Significant Weight Change (IDTSWC), dated 12/29/23, the IDTSWC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 50 sampled residents (Resident 10) care plan was updated and revised after Resident 10's order for tube feeding (TF-a way to provide nutrition when you cannot eat or drink safely by mouth) was changed. This failure had the potential to result in further significant weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's RD [Registered Dietitian] Tube Feeding / wt [weight] (RDTF), note dated 1/27/24, the RDTF note indicated, TF order: 2 cans of Jevity 1.2 [liquid nutrition for TF) via G-Tube [a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach] at 0600 [6:00 a.m.], 1200 [12:00 p.m.], 1800 [6:00 p.m.], and 1 can Jevity 1.2 (8 oz [ounces- unit of weight]) at 0000 [12:00 a.m.].Totals 7 cans, Res [resident] was reviewed d/t [due to] wt [weight] loss of.-13# [pounds] (-7.7%) [of body weight] x 3 m [months], likely d/t inadequate intake of TF. Recommend adding 1 can Jevity 1.2 (8 oz) at 0900 [9:00 a.m.]. During an interview on 2/1/24 at 11:19 a.m. with Assistant Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for two of 50 sampled residents (Resident 42 and Resident 10). This failure had the potential to result in skin injuries, infections, and pain. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/29/24 at 9:12 a.m. with Resident 42 outside of Resident 42's room, Resident 42's nails were long, thick and brown in color. Resident 42 stated she would love to get some help cutting them and thought she might need a specialist because of how long and thick they were. Resident 42 stated they were painful anytime they got caught on something. During an interview on 2/1/24 at 9:57 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, RN 1 stated she thinks Resident 42 had fungus under her nails and Resident 42's nails would not have been so difficult to cut if it had been taken care of sooner. RN 1 stated she did not notify the doctor of the suspected fungal infection because the social services department had already been working on a referral to a specialist. During an interview on 2/1/24 at 9:59…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 50 sampled residents (Resident 18) bowel (the tubes in your body through which digested food passes from your stomach to your anus) management protocol was followed. This failure resulted in Resident 18 not having bowel movement for four days and had the potential to result in worsening of his health condition. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/31/24 at 3:41 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 18's Task: Bowel Continence (BC), dated 1/18/24 through 1/27/24 was reviewed. The BC indicated, Resident 18 did not have a bowel movement (BM) from 1/22/24 through 1/25/24 (four days) as indicated by a check mark in the column labeled as No Bowel Movement. DON stated the facility's bowel protocol was not followed when Resident 18 did not receive treatment in a timely manner, after having no bowel movement for four (4) consecutive days, as treatment should have been provided after three (3) days of no BM. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/31/24 at 3:43 p.m. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 10) was accurately assess for risk of elopement (leaving an area without supervision or permission). This failure had the potential for Resident 10 to get out of the facility without supervision and compromise his safety. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/29/24 at 12:15 p.m. in Resident 10's room with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 7, Resident 10 was wearing a code alert bracelet on his right wrist. LVN 7 stated Resident 10 used to get sad and would try to leave. During an interview on 2/1/24 at 11:27 a.m. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), ADON stated Resident 10 tries to leave the facility at times. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/1/24 at 11:37 a.m. with Administrator, Resident 10's Elopement Risk Observation/Assessment (EROA), dated 12/2/23 was reviewed. The EROA indicated, Elopement Risk Score 8. If the total score is 10 or greater, the Resident would be considered to be At Risk for Elopement.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled resident's (Resident 54) Foley Catheter (FC - flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) was monitored. This failure had the potential to result in FC dislodgement. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/31/24 at 7 a.m. with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) in front of nurses' station 2, Resident 54 was sitting in his wheelchair with the tubing for his Foley catheter on the floor, laying directly behind the front wheel of the wheelchair. MDSC stated the tubing could have been pulled out and caused pain. MDSC stated the tubing being on the floor could have also caused infection. MDSC stated the Foley catheter tubing should have been positioned off the ground. During a review of Resident 54's Physician's Order (PO), dated 4/21/23, the PO indicated, Monitor Foley Catheter induced laceration [cut] to Penis for signs of worsening and infection. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Catheter Care, Urinary, dated August…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure timeliness of Registered Dietitian (RD) nutrition assessment after a significant weight loss for one of four sampled residents (Resident 10) who received nutrition via G-tube (a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach). This failure resulted in delayed nutrition interventions. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's Weights and Vitals Summary (WVS), the WVS indicated, the following weights: 7/25/23 - 174 pounds (lbs) 8/29/23 - 168 lbs 9/26/23 - 167 lbs 10/10/23 - 168 lbs 11/14/23 - 164 lbs 12/12/23 - 161 lbs 1/16/24 - 155 lbs 1/23/24 - 152 lbs During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/31/24 at 1:59 p.m. with RD 1, Resident 10's IDT [interdisciplinary] Significant Weight Change (IDTSWC), dated 1/19/24 was reviewed. The IDTSWC indicated, Resident 10 had a significant weight change as of 1/16/24 of - 6 lb x 1 month 3.7% [loss of body weight], -13 lb x 3 month 7.7%, -18 lb x 6 month 10.4%, Current weight: 155# [pounds].Current Diet: GTube Feeding Jevity 1.2 [a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration for one of six sampled residents (Resident 93) when nursing staff did not administer the correct medication and dose ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to adversely affect Resident 93's health condition. Findings: During an observation on 1/31/24 at 7:40 a.m. outside of Resident 93's room, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 prepared and administered 2 tablets of Oyster Shell Calcium (calcium supplement) 500 milligrams (mg-metric unit of weight). During a review of the Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 1/31/24, the OSR indicated, Oyster Calcium + D Oral Tablet 250-3.125 MG-MCG [microgram-unit of weight] (Calcium Carbonate [calcium supplement]-Vitamin D [supplement essential in the absorption of calcium]) Give 2 tablet by mouth one time a day for supplement. During an interview on 1/31/24 at 11:58 a.m. with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated she gave Resident 93 the wrong oyster shell calcium. During a review of the facility's P&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Obtain a physician's order for one of four sampled residents (Resident 95) to discontinue Seroquel (medication used to treat mental disorders that affect a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly) after the physician had agreed to the recommendation of the pharmacy consultant. 2. Follow-up/obtain physician's order for one of four sampled residents (Resident 42) to include parameter/recommendation by pharmacy consultant in administering Percocet (Oxycodone-Acetaminophen - pain medication used to treat moderate to severe pain, known to cause drowsiness and respiratory distress or even death when taken in high doses or combined with other substances). These failures had the potential for Resident 95 and Resident 42 to received unnecessary medications for prolonged period of time. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 95's Consultant Pharmacist's Recommendation To Inter-Disciplinary Team (CPRIDT), dated [DATE], the CPRIDT indicated, This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 15) pain level was properly assess prior to administering narcotic (highly addictive controlled medication used to relieve pain) pain medication. This failure had the potential for Resident 15's pain to not appropriately treated and worsening of her health condition. Finding: During a review of Resident's 15 Medication Administration Note (MAN), dated 1/8/24, the MAN indicated, Percocet [narcotic pain medication] Tablet 5-325 MG [milligram -a unit of measure] Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for Moderate to Severe Pain (4-10) [0 no pain, 1-3 mild pain, 4-6 moderate pain, and 7-10 severe pain]. During an interview on 2/1/24 at 2:08 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4, LVN 4 stated Resident 15 is only able to verbalize two words, mama and yes. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/1/24 at 3:24 p.m. with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), Resident's 15's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated October 2023, November 2023, December 2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled Dietary Aide (DA)1 demonstrated the correct technique for testing the sanitation of dishes after running dishes through the low temperature dish machine. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illness (illness caused by contaminated food). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/29/24 at 9:15 a.m. with DA 1, in the facility's kitchen, DA 1 obtained a chlorine (chemical element) chemistry strip (strip used to check concentration of sanitizer) and inserted it into the low temperature dish machine's water tank. DA 1 compared the chemistry strip to the color-coded graph on the chlorine vial. DA 1 stated it was 100 PPM [parts per million]. During an interview on 1/29/24 at 9:17 a.m. with Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), DSS stated DA 1 should have checked the sanitizer concentration at the plate level to ensure the dishes were properly sanitized. DSS stated DA 1 did not demonstrate the correct way to test the sanitizer concentration to ensure the dishes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu and/or facility's diet manual as planned for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 23 and Resident 85) when: 1. Lettuce in the tossed green salad and whole, sliced tomatoes were served that were larger than 1/2 (inch) pieces for Resident 23's mechanical soft (diet designed for people that have trouble chewing and swallowing) diet order. 2. Entree alternates were not nutritionally evaluated by a registered dietitian (RD) for Resident 85's CCHO (controlled carbohydrate diet for diabetes) diet. This failure had the potential for Resident 23 to choke and Resident 85 to have elevated blood sugars. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/29/24 at 11:56 a.m. with Resident 23 in Station 3 Dining Room, Resident 23 ate all the food that was on her tray except for most of the salad. Resident 23 stated she would have eaten all of her salad if it was cut up smaller. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/29/24 at 12:08 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food handling and sanitation when: 1. A Time Temperature Control for Safety (TCS- food that requires time-temperature control to prevent the growth of bacteria) food was not cooled down according to facility's policy. 2. One of one sampled dietary aide (DA 2) washed her hands after handling dirty dishes and prior to handling clean dishes. These failures had the potential to result in the development of foodborne (caused by contaminated food) illness. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/30/24 at 9:08 a.m. with Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), the facility's Cooling/Chilling Temperature Control Log (CTCL), dated October 2023 to January 2024 were reviewed. The CTCL indicated, on 11/14/23, roast beef was documented at a starting cooling temperature (temp) of 179 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F- unit of temperature measurement) at 1 p.m. The next temperature noted in the log was documented at 3:30 p.m. 2 1/2 (two and half hours) after the start of the initial cool down. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure an accurate and complete clinical record (CR) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 10). This failure resulted in weight loss interventions not carried out in a timely manner. 2. Follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Participation - Assessment/Care Plans for one of six sampled residents (Resident 52). This failure had the potential for Resident 52 to not have the opportunity to participate in, be aware of and develop care goals and outcomes, and incorporate his personal and cultural preferences. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/31/24 at 1:59 p.m. with RD 1, Resident 10's IDT [interdisciplinary] Significant Weight Change (IDTSWC), dated 1/19/24 was reviewed. The IDTSWC indicated, Resident 10 had a significant weight change as of 1/16/24 of - 6 lb x 1 month 3.7% [loss of body weight], -13 lb x 3 month 7.7%, -18 lb x 6 month 10.4%, Current weight: 155# [pounds].Current Diet: GTube Feeding Jevity 1.2 [a nutrition liquid formula delivered via a tube].IDT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene when a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene after checking the blood sugar for one of two sampled residents (Resident 126). This failure had the potential to result in the spread of bloodborne pathogens (germs that are carried in the blood and can cause disease in people). Findings: During an observation on 1/31/24 11:12 a.m. in Resident 126's room, LVN 1 applied gloves and tested the blood sugar for Resident 126. There was an error with test strip. LVN 1 grabbed a new test strip from the vial of test strips on the medication cart but did not change her gloves or wash her hands. During an interview on 1/31/24 at 11:16 a.m. with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated she did not wash hands or change gloves after she checked Resident 126's blood sugar. LVN 1 stated she should have changed her gloves before grabbing a new strip and taking the Resident 126's blood sugar a second time. During an interview on 2/1/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure titled Consent to Treat for three of 50 sampled residents (Resident 10, Resident 280, and Resident 282 when: 1. Resident 10 was given Flu (contagious respiratory illness) vaccine without obtaining a consent. 2. Resident 280 and Resident 282 were not assessed and offered Flu vaccines on admission. These failures had the potential to spread miss information and infectious diseases. Finding: 1. During an interview on 2/1/24 at 1:22 p.m. with Administrator, Administrator stated he could not find a consent for Flu vaccine for Resident 10 and he should have a consent. During a review of Resident 10's Infection Note (IN), dated 9/26/23, the IN indicated, To receive season influenza vaccine administer 0.5 ml IM (intramuscular- muscle to absorbing administered medication) one time. Administer per facility protocol. Orders carried out as planned no signs and symptoms of adverse reaction. 2. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/31/24 at 1:42 p.m. with Infection Preventionist (IP),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was transferred using a Hoyer (assistive device that allows patients to be transferred between a bed and a chair) lift according to the comprehensive care plan. This failure resulted in Resident 1 falling and sustaining an acute intertrochanteric (fracture [broken bone] of the proximal [near the center of the body] femur [thigh bone] that occur between the greater and lesser trochanter [part of the femur near its joint with the hip bone]) fracture to the left hip. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 7/27/23, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral (brain) infarction (obstruction of the blood supply to an organ or region of tissue) affecting left dominant side. During a review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order to apply an immobilizer (or sling to reduce or eliminate motion of the body or a part of the body) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in worsening of Resident 1 ' s fracture (broken bone) of the right upper arm. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s MD Progress Notes (PN), dated July 31, 2023, the PN indicated, Right proximal spiral humerus fracture (broken bone of the upper arm). Right arm sling (a device to limit movement, also known as immobilizer). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Care Plan (CP), dated, July 31, 2023, the CP indicated, Focus: Pain due to right shoulder fracture. Intervention: Use immobilizer per MD (Medical Doctor) order. During a review of Resident 1 ' s IDT (Interdisciplinary team - collaborative care, where physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and other professionals work together to plan and coordinate resident care) Care Conference (IDTCC), dated July 31, 2023, the IDTCC indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five dietary aides (DA) performed handwashing upon entering the kitchen. This failure had the potential to result in contamination of residents' food which may lead to foodborne illnesses. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 3/9/22, at 11:20 AM, with Dietary Manager (DM) in the kitchen tray line, DA was observed pushing the lunch tray carts out of the kitchen and coming back to the kitchen tray line without performing handwashing. DM stated, it would be a nice practice to wash her (DA) hands after pushing out the cart, and coming back inside. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Sanitation and Infection Control, [undated], the P&P indicated, Subject: Handwashing; Policy: The food service workers will keep their hands and exposed portion of their arms clean. Hands must be properly and frequently washed to prevent cross contamination . Procedures: 1. All food service employees are educated on the importance of hand washing at orientation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff have competencies necessary to care for two of 33 sampled residents (Resident 32, Resident 46) based on the resident's needs. This failure had the potential for the resident's unmet care needs and delay in provision of care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 3/10/22, the OSR indicated, Cranberry Tablet 400 mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Supplement. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/10/22, at 8:32 AM, with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), in the medication storage room, ADON stated, the facility only stored Cranberry supplements of 425 mgs but not in the 400 mgs per the physician orders for Resident 32. During an interview on 3/10/22, at 7:55 AM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, while being followed for Medication Administration for Resident 32, LVN 1 stated, I am a registry nurse. I am nervous. This is my first day here. I thought I'd get an orientation like a run down of the facility. I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for two of 33 sampled residents (Resident 17 and Resident 71) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 did not pull the privacy curtain while administering medication to Resident 17's gastrostomy tube (G-tube - tube inserted through the stomach that brings nutrition directly to the stomach). 2. Resident 71's urinary catheter drainage bag (bag that collects urine) was not covered with a privacy bag. These failures had the potential for Resident 17 and Resident 71 to have a decrease in feelings of self worth and self esteem. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/9/22, at 4:20 PM, with LVN 3, of a medication pass administration to Resident 17, LVN 3 lifted up Resident 17's gown exposing Resident 17's abdominal area to access Resident 17's G-tube. Resident 17's bed was located next to the door and the door and privacy curtain were open. LVN 3 stated, she had realized she had not pulled and closed the privacy curtain. 2. During a review of Resident 71's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for a diabetic ulcer (injury to the skin) for one of 33 sampled residents, (Resident 296). This failure had the potential for not providing the appropriate care and adversely affect Resident 296's health condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 296's Physician's Orders (PO), dated 3/4/22, the PO indicated, Betadine (solution used to prevent and treat infection) diabetic ulcer to right heel, notify Medical Doctor (MD) of worsening every shift. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 3/9/22, at 9:44 AM, with Minimum Data Set Supervisor (MDSS), Resident 296's Care Plans (CP) were reviewed. MDSS reviewed Resident 296's CP, and did not find a CP addressing Resident 296's diabetic ulcer. MDSS stated, there should have been a care plan written. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person- Centered, dated 1/18, the P&P indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for two of 33 sampled residents (Resident 32 and Resident 71). These failures had the potential for adverse outcomes of residents care. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/10/22, at 7:55 AM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, of a medication pass preparation, LVN 1 was preparing medications to be administered to Resident 32 for his morning medications. LVN 1 stated, she would not be able to administer Residents 32's physicians order for Cranberry supplement (pill that provides nutrients) 400 milligram (mg - a unit of measure) as in her medication cart were only Cranberry supplements of 425 mgs. During a review of Resident 32's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 3/10/22, the OSR indicated, Cranberry Tablet 400 mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Supplement. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/10/22, at 8:32 AM, with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), in the medication storage room, ADON stated, the facility only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to ensure residents maintain the highest level of range of motion (ROM - measurement of movement around a specific joint or body part) and mobility (the ability to move or be moved freely and easily), for two of 33 sampled residents, (Resident 46, and Resident 36). These failures had the potential for a decline in ROM and an avoidable change of condition. Findings: During an observation on 3/7/22, at 11 AM, Resident 46 was observed in bed watching TV, with a left wrist contracture (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff) without a rolled towel inside her hand. Resident 46's both feet were observed with foot drop (weakness or difficulty lifting both the front part of the foot) without an Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO- brace worn around the lower leg and foot to support the ankle and holds both foot and ankle in a flexed position). During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nurse staffing information was posted daily, readily accessible and visible to all residents and visitors for one of three nursing stations (Nursing Station One). This failure had the potential to result in data regarding the number of staff and the actual hours worked of staff was not accurate, accessible and posted visibly by residents and visitors. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/7/22, at 12 PM, with Director of Staff Development (DSD), across Nursing Station One, a tall white partition (divider) was observed against the wall. DSD stated, the posted nurse staffing was posted at the back of the tall white partition. DSD stated, it should be visible and not covered by the tall white partition. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/7/22, at 12:05 PM, with the DSD, the facility's Posted Nurse Staffing Information (PNSI), dated 3/6/22 was reviewed. DSD stated, the PNSI should be updated to 3/7/22 and not yesterday's date. The facility's PNSI policy was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist psychotropic medication (drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) recommendation was acted upon for one of 33 sampled residents (Resident 66). This failure had the potential for adverse drug reactions, excessive duration, excessive dose and/or unnecessary use of psychotropic medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 66's Director of Nursing Summary Report (DNSR), dated 2/28/22, Resident 66's DNSR indicated, the resident is currently administered Lexapro (a drug used to treat depression or anxiety) 5 milligrams (mg - unit of measure) daily (QD - everyday) this dose was last assessed back in September of 2020. Since this assessment, his behaviors have been noted as minimal . may we discontinue/GDR [gradual dose reduction - tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or can be discontinued] Lexapro therapy due to over all clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control standards, when a certified nursing assistant (CNA) 1 did not don (put on) the proper personal protective equipment (PPE - protective clothing designed to protect the wearer's body from injury or clothing). This failure had the potential to result in spreading infection to residents, other staff, and visitors. Findings: During an observation on 3/10/22, at 10:52 AM, at nursing station one, CNA 1 demonstrated the process of donning and doffing (taking off) PPE. CNA 1 failed to remove her surgical mask and replace it with an N-95 respirator (specialty mask capable of filtering up to 95% of airborne particles) as required by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for preventing the spread of COVID-19 (highly contagious virus which resulted in a global pandemic). During an interview on 3/10/22, at 11:05 AM, with CNA 1, CNA 1 stated, I forgot to put on the N-95 mask. During a review of the facility's Infection Prevention Quality Control Program (IPQCP),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide the minimum square footage as required by regulation in 20 of 48 facility bedrooms. This failure had the potential to affect the care and safety of residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/27/25 at 10:13 a.m. with Environmental Services Director (ESD), in the facility's multiple occupancy rooms, the multiple occupancy rooms were measured. ESD stated the following rooms did not provide the minimum square footage (sq. ft.) as required by regulation (80 sq. ft. per resident for multi-occupation rooms): room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 239 inches (in.) x (by) 132 in. (219 sq. ft.) and had three resident beds; room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 239 in. x 132 in. (219 sq. ft.) and had three resident beds; room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 238 in. x 130 in. (215 sq. ft.) and had three resident beds; room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 238 in. x 129 in. (213 sq. ft.) and had three resident beds; room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 238 in. x 130 in. (215 sq.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the minimum square footage as required by regulation in 20 of the facility's bedrooms. This had the potential to affect the care and safety of residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/1/24 at 5:21 p.m. with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) and the Administrator, the facility's multiple occupancy rooms were observed, measured and the facility floor plan was reviewed. MS stated, the residents' rooms square footage is the same as what is on the floor plan. The floor plan indicated the following rooms did not provide the minimum square footage (sq. ft.) as required by regulation (80 sq. ft. per resident for multi-occupation rooms): room [ROOM NUMBER] - 220.4 square feet- 3 residents. room [ROOM NUMBER]- 220.4 square feet- 3 residents. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 217.3 square feet- 3 residents. room [ROOM NUMBER]- 217 square feet- 3 residents. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 218 square feet- 3 residents. room [ROOM NUMBER] -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide the minimum square footage as required by regulations in 19 of the facility's bedrooms. This had the potential to affect the care the residents receive in these rooms. Findings: During a concurrent observation of the facility, interview with the Administrator, and review of the facility's floor plan, on 3/10/22, at 10 AM, the floor plan indicated the following rooms did not provide the minimum square footage (sq. ft.) as required by regulation (80 sq. ft. per resident for multi-occupation rooms): room [ROOM NUMBER] -220.4 square feet- 3 residents. room [ROOM NUMBER] -220.4 square feet- 3 residents. room [ROOM NUMBER] -217.3 square feet- 3 residents. room [ROOM NUMBER] -217 square feet- 3 residents. room [ROOM NUMBER] -218 square feet- 3 residents. room [ROOM NUMBER] -219 square feet- 3 residents. room [ROOM NUMBER] -218 square feet- 3 residents room [ROOM NUMBER] -221 square feet- 3 residents. room [ROOM NUMBER] -214 square feet- 3 residents.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,190 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,190 — penalty dated 2024-10-25
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRUIST BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 12/07/2023 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| DOTSON, SANDRA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| RASMUSSEN, MASON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/15/2023 |
| WADHWANI, SUNEEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/15/2023 |
| PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/15/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $434K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055568. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.