Copper Ridge Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 822 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 79.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 410 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 119.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.29 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.49 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record, and policy review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders and complete monitoring and adjustment of warfarin (also called Coumadin, a high-risk medication used to prevent blood clots by thinning the blood and has a significant risk for bleeding complications), for one of four residents sampled for warfarin use (Resident 1), when Licensed Nurse (LN) A incorrectly revised Resident 1's physician's order for a lab test for a prothrombin time and International Normalized Ratio (PT/INR, the laboratory testing parameter utilized to monitor warfarin therapy. The PT is the number of seconds required for the blood to clot, and the INR is the standardized ratio of the PT), and caused the order not to populate on to Resident 1's Electronic Health Record (EHR). This lapse in clinical oversight eliminated opportunities for timely intervention, which could have mitigated the risk of bleeding complications and prevented Resident 1 from enduring serious clinical harm which necessitated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Physician ordered restorative nursing services (a program that helped residents maintain or improve their highest possible level of physical function) was provided to one out of 24 sampled residents (Resident 15). This failure had the potential for a decline in functional status and to negatively impact psychosocial well-being.Findings:A review of the facility's undated policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Restorative Nursing Program, indicated, residents would receive restorative nursing care as needed to maintain safety and independence in their functional ability. A review of Resident 15's admission Record, dated 7/15/25, indicated, Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of muscle weakness and difficulty in walking (ambulation). Resident 15 was their own responsible party (decision maker). A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/16/25, indicated that a Brief Interview for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet resident adaptive equipment needs for one of 24 residents (Resident 33) when Registered Nurse (RN) G was not aware of Resident 33's adaptive equipment needs and unable to provide information on where to find adaptive equipment for Resident 33 to meet his needs. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 33's ability to drink fluids independently. Findings:During a review of facility job description titled Job Description: Registered Nurse dated 2/2024, indicated RN was to, review nurses' notes to ensure they are informative and descriptive of the nursing care being provided, that they reflect the resident's response to the care, and that such are provided in accordance with the resident's wishes, RN was to provide direct nursing care as necessary, RN was to report problem areas to the Director and assist in developing and implementing corrective action, RN was to keep the Director informed of the status of residents and other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that two of four Residents sampled (Resident 1 and Resident 2) had care plans (a document that outlines a patient's health care needs and the actions and interventions required to address them) for naloxone (a medication that rapidly reverses the effects of an opioid [a strong medication that blocks pain and poses a risk of death by overdose] overdose [when a dose of an opioid is too high, and causes the person's breathing and heartbeat to slow down or stop]).These failures had the potential to result in delayed identification of and interventions for an opioid overdose for Resident 1 and Resident 2.Findings:Review of a facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated March 2022, indicated b. describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. And e. reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that three of four residents sampled (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 4) who had naloxone (a medication that rapidly reverses the effects of an opioid [a strong medication that blocks pain and poses a risk of death by overdose] overdose [when a dose of an opioid is too high, and causes the person's breathing and heartbeat to slow down or stop]) prescribed had nurses competent on where their naloxone was stored.This failure had potential to result in delayed treatment of an opioid overdose and death for Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 4.Findings: Review of a facility policy titled Opioid Overdose Response (Naloxone) dated October 2023, indicated Naloxone Ordering and Administration 1. Opioid overdose-related deaths can be prevented when naloxone (e.g., Narcan [a brand name for naloxone]) is administered in a timely manner.During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/18/25 at 2:03 p.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN A), LN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of four residents sampled (Resident 1) was safe from a significant medication error when Licensed Nurse (LN D) crushed Resident 1's morphine sulfate (an opioid which blocks pain and poses the risk of death by morphine overdose [when a dose of an opioid is too high, and causes the person's breathing and heartbeat to slow down or stop]) extended release (a type of medication that is designed to release its ingredients slowly rather than all at once) and gave it to Resident 1.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 having a morphine overdose and dying.Findings:Review of the admission record for Resident 1, indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including cancer. Review of Resident 1's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool that measures the health status in nursing home residents) Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - an assessment tool used by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) received her intravenous (IV, a way to give fluids, medicine, nutrition, or blood directly into the blood stream through a vein) antibiotic called ceftriaxone (a medication used to treat bacterial infections) in a manner consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with the facility's policy to treat her urinary tract infection (infection of the kidneys and bladder) when: 1. Resident 1 did not receive her IV ceftriaxone until more than 4 hours after the physician ordered it. 2. The physician's order for the IV antibiotic ceftriaxone did not have an infusion rate (how fast an IV medication is given). These failures resulted in: 1. A delay in treatment of Resident 1's urinary tract infection. 2. The potential to infuse the ceftriaxone too fast or too slow to be effective or safe for Resident 1, and no way for nursing staff to document the rate the IV ceftriaxone was infused.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Licensed Nurses administered medication in accordance with their Medication Administration Policy for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), when 4 and a half Norco tablets (a narcotic pain pill), were found in a container in Resident 1 ' s room. This failure had the potential to lead to possible overdose (when a person takes more than the recommended amount of a medication which can lead to serious harm or death), drug diversion (the illegal distribution, or abuse of prescription drugs, or their use for purposes not intended by the prescriber), and possible exposure of other residents to potentially hazardous substances. Findings: Review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included anxiety disorder (worrying that interferes with daily activities) and major depressive disorder (sad mood or the loss of interest or pleasure in nearly all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurate for the disposition of a resident at the time of discharge for 1 (Resident #102) of 23 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled Resident Assessments, revised 10/2023, indicated, 11. All persons who have completed any portion of the MDS resident assessment form must sign the document attesting to the accuracy of such information. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #102 on 07/05/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of arthritis and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Per the admission Record, Resident #102 discharged home on [DATE]. Resident #102's care plan included a focus are initiated 07/10/2024, that indicated the resident and their responsible party/family member indicated a preference for the resident to discharge home/community with family/friend support. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe infection control practices were followed when staff did not properly wear a surgical mask (face covering) and a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) drank water while walking down a hallway that contained COVID-19 positive residents. This failure had the potential to spread COVID-19 to other residents, potentially leading to a decline in health status. Findings: A review of an undated document titled, Important Reminders, indicated, the Proper way to wear a mask, was for the mask to cover the nose, mouth, and chin. Important Reminders indicated, Personal food and drink was not allowed in hallways or at nurse ' s station. The image of a properly worn mask, that was included in the Important Reminders, included a person wearing a surgical mask. During an observation on 8/21/22 at 2:00 pm, located on Cherry Hall (the name of the unit that contained residents who tested positive for COVID-19), CNA B was observed walking down the entire length of Cherry Hall wearing a surgical mask that did not cover her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor resident rights for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's caregiver (CG) requested a nurse to be present at the care conference meeting (a group of medical professionals that met to discuss resident care and care planning with the resident, family members, or caregivers), and nursing was not notified of the request. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 and Resident 1's representatives to not be allowed to participate in resident care planning. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Care Planning- Interdisciplinary Team, revised 3/1/22, indicated, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a group of medical professions that meet to discuss resident care and care planning) was responsible for .the development of resident care plans and nursing was included in the IDT. A review of the undated admission Record, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA