No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Roseville Care Center

1161 Cirby Way, Roseville, CA 95661 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 210 certified beds · (916) 782-1238 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1082 Sunrise Ave · (916) 786-2112 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.2 mi
900 Sunrise Ave · (916) 782-6242 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1039 Sunrise Ave · (916) 786-6104 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1203 Gabrielli Dr · (916) 251-9251

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.5%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.2%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.4%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.9%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.9%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.0%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.6%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.4%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.9%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.4%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.182.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.681.571.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 445 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
80.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.83U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.40hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.38hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 80.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 146 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.83 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.3%CMS range 59.3–68.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 8.6–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge80.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge79.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge66.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.1%CMS range 7.7–14.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.111.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
1.22
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.19
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.94
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.45
RN hoursweekends
37.6%
Total nursing turnover
48.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 210 beds and averages 179.3 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-27)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse for one of four sampled residents (Resident 4) when facility staff witnessed Resident 1 hit Resident 4. This failure resulted in Resident 4 to verbalize sadness and not be free from abuse and potential harm.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis that included dementia unspecified severity with agitation (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and anxiety (an intense, excessive, and persistent feeling of fear, dread, or uneasiness).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 11/28/25, Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess cognition) score of 10 out of 15 which indicated Resident 1 had moderately impaired cognition.During a review of Resident 4's clinical record, Resident 4 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for reporting an allegation of abuse for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 reported to nursing staff that she was injured by facility staff during patient care. This failure had placed Resident 1 and other residents in the facility at risk for potential physical abuse and/or psychosocial harm.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility October 2025 with multiple diagnoses which included muscle weakness and abnormalities of gait (manner of walking and limb movement) and mobility. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 11/5/25, indicated Resident 1 had moderate memory impairment. During an interview on 2/5/26, at 1:28 p.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, LN 1 confirmed Resident 1 had informed him that Resident 1 had gotten injured while receiving care by facility staff and that Resident 1 had felt unsafe. LN 1 stated he had not reported the allegation to facility management. During an interview on 2/5/26, at 2:52 p.m., with the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide supervision to protect two residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) from abuse when Resident 1 and Resident 2 had a physical altercation. This failure had the potential to result in physical injury or emotional distress for both Resident 1 and Resident 2. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with multiple diagnoses including dementia (a condition characterized by impairment of brain functions, including memory loss and judgment), diabetes (too much glucose in the blood), osteoarthritis (the flexible tissue at the end of the bones, cartilage, wears down causing pain and decreased mobility). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 4/29/25, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-tool to assess cognition) score of 3 out of 15 that indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 1's MDS, Functional Abilities,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · No revisit needed
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper dishwashing process and sanitary conditions were maintained in the dietetic services when: 1. Two serving metal pans with debris particles stacked together were found stored in a clean and ready-to-use storage area. 2. Dietary Aide (DA) 1 was not able to verbalize and/or demonstrate: -The practice of measuring the water temperatures for the automated dishwashing and -The knowledge of the temperatures and sanitation concentrations for the manual dishwashing by 3-compartment sink procedure. 3. The wash and rinse temperatures log and instructions of the dishwashing machine did not match the manufacturer's guidance. These failures had the potential to result in food contamination which could cause illness in 172 out of 172 medically vulnerable residents who received and consumed food from the facility kitchen. Findings: 1. A kitchen initial tour observation and concurrent interview with Dietary Supervisor (DS) on 6/24/25 at 9:08 a.m. was conducted. There were two of the one-third (1/3) sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for two of 52 sampled residents (Resident 170 and Resident 15) when: 1. Resident 170's LAL (low air loss, designed to prevent and treat pressure ulcers by reducing and redistributing pressure on the body) mattress was not followed as ordered; and 2. Resident 15's blood pressure medication was not administered as ordered. These failures increased the potential for Resident 170 to develop new pressure ulcers and for Resident 15 to experience complications. Findings: 1. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 170 was admitted early part of June 2025 with diagnoses including rhabdomyolysis (breakdown of muscle tissue) and unstageable pressure ulcer (or pressure injury [PI], base of wound covered by a layer of dead tissue that may be yellow, brown or black and stage is unclear) of other site. A review of Resident 170's physician order dated 6/4/25 indicated treatment orders for five (5) PIs and an order for LAL mattress. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement pharmaceutical policies and procedures to meet the needs of each resident and ensure that these procedures were consistent with standards of practice, when: 1. A medication for Resident 76 was not administered as prescribed by physician; 2. A prescribed medication was not available at the time of administration for Resident 529; 3. Resident 731 did not receive prescribed ointment treatment for multiple days; 4. Resident 68 received medication beyond the expiration date; 5. A loose unidentified medication was stored in the drawer with controlled substances, and 6. A loose pink pill was observed on the floor in hallway. These failures had the potential for worsening of resident's condition from receiving the smaller dose that was ordered, not receiving important medication and treatment as prescribed, receive medication with unsafe or reduced potency from being used past their expiration date, and diversion or misuse of controlled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menu spreadsheet (a menu excel sheet that indicated what items and portions to be served for each prescribed diet) and recipes (a set of instructions for preparing a particular dish, including a list of the ingredients required) were followed for the therapeutic diets during the lunch meal distribution on 6/25/25 when: 1.Resident 14 with low fat and low cholesterol diet (a diet designed to lower elevated levels of cholesterol and other fats in the blood to reduce the risk of heart disease) received tartar sauce (a cold sauce, typically eaten with fish, consisting of mayonnaise) instead of a lemon slice for the lunch. 2.Four residents (Resident 36, 110, 147 and 152) with a fortified diet (a diet designed for residents who cannot consume adequate amounts of calories or proteins to maintain their weight or nutritional status) did not receive fortified food with their meals. 3.Three residents (Resident 62, 85 and 89) with mechanical soft texture diet (a diet designed with modified texture for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control measures to prevent the introduction and spread of infections to residents, when: 1. The nursing staff did not implement EBP (enhanced barrier precautions) for Resident 731; 2. The housekeeping staff did not wear appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) while cleaning inside a room on EBP; 3. Resident 25's nebulizer mask (a face mask that fits over the nose and mouth to deliver medication into the lungs) was not stored properly; and 4. Treatment Nurse provided care to an open wound and did not wear adequate PPE per EBP standards. These failures had the potential to spread infections among residents, staff and visitors. Findings: During an observation and interview with Resident 731 on 6/24/25, at 12:48 p.m., the resident was sitting upright in his in bed dressed in hospital gown. The resident was awake, alert and oriented. An indwelling Foley catheter (a flexible plastic tube inserted into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the laundry was maintained in a sanitary manner and in good repair when the contaminated linen area was found dirty, and a window screen was damaged. This failure had the potential to result in the facility not providing safe and sanitary handling of laundry items used by residents for a census of 175. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/26/25 at 9 a.m. with the Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor (HLS) in the contaminated linen area in the laundry room, dust particles were observed on laundry supplies and racks. The windows in the area were also observed with dust particles on the screens, and one of the window screens was damaged and had a hole in it. The HLS confirmed the observations and stated, .it [laundry room] should be clean all the time because of infection. During an observation and interview on 6/26/25 at 9:26 a.m. with the Maintenance Worker 1 (MW 1) in the contaminated linen area in the laundry room, the MW 1 confirmed the window screen had a hole, there was dust…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that two of 52 sampled residents (Resident 82 and Resident 9) were free from unnecessary drugs including chemical restraints when medications were administered without specific target behaviors and diagnoses to support indication for use of these drugs. This failure resulted in the administration of medications without adequate indication for use. Findings: 1a. During a review of Resident 82's clinical record, the record indicated Resident 82 was admitted in late 2022 with multiple diagnoses including bipolar disorder (a mental condition manifested by extreme mood swings) and anxiety disorder (a mental condition manifested by worry, fear, or nervousness that is excessive, persistent, and interferes with daily life). A review of Resident 82's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 3/21/25, indicated Resident 82 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess cognition) score of 10 out of 15 that indicated Resident 82 had moderately impaired cognition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments were completed for two of 52 sampled residents (Resident 170 and Resident 176) when: 1. Resident 170's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) did not indicate the correct number of pressure ulcer or pressure injury (PU or PI) present on admission; and, 2. Resident 176's MDS did not reflect the resident's status at the time of discharge from the facility. These failures increased the potential for Resident 170 not to receive consistent care and for Resident 176 not to receive referral for necessary services in the community. Findings: 1. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 170 was admitted early part of June 2025 with diagnoses including rhabdomyolysis (breakdown of muscle tissue) and unstageable pressure ulcer (or pressure injury [PI], base of wound covered by a layer of dead tissue that may be yellow, brown or black and stage is unclear) of other site. A review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of 52 sampled residents (Resident 160) from further injury when they did not implement specified interventions from the care plan to prevent skin tears. This failure resulted in Resident 160 sustaining additional skin tears to her left leg. Findings: A review of Resident 160's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] after a syncopal episode with a ground level fall resulting in a left femur (thigh bone) and left humerus (upper arm bone) fractures. A review of Resident 160's change of condition (COC) note, dated 6/7/25, indicated Resident 160 had sustained a new skin tear to left lower leg during a wheelchair transfer with a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). A review of Resident 160's Potential for Skin Tears care plan, initiated on 6/7/25, indicated interventions to prevent skin tears were to keep her nails trimmed and short, pad the wheelchair arms and legs, wear protective sleeves, use a pressure relief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of quality for one of 52 sampled residents (Resident 731), when the facility did not follow a physician order for straight catheterization (a thin, flexible tube is inserted into the urethra to drain urine and removed immediately) when the resident complained of inability to urinate and inserted a Foley catheter (a flexible plastic tube inserted into the bladder) to provide continuous urinary drainage. This failure had the potential to result in urinary tract infection. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 731 was admitted to the facility in June 2025 with multiple diagnoses which included aftercare following joint replacement surgery and retention of urine (inability to urinate). A review of the physician order for Resident 731, dated 6/21/25, indicated,If patient is unable to urinate after 6 hours, bladder scan [a portable medical device to measure how much urine the bladder has]. If bladder scan and RV [residual volume] greater than…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Findings: A review of Resident 732's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident recently after hospitalization for lung infection. Resident 732's multiple diagnoses included muscle weakness and unsteadiness on feet. A review of the 'Order Summary Report' contained a physician's order dated 6/8/25 indicating that Resident 732 had capacity to make healthcare decisions. A review of Resident 732's care plan titled Malnutrition: Resident is at risk for malnutritioninitiated on 6/8/25, indicated resident's goal was to maintain adequate nutritional status as evidenced by stable weight. The care plan interventions indicated, Assist with meals/fluids as needed, encourage adequate nutrition and hydration, encourage position [sic] of choice of meals. The care plan did not contain resident's food preferences, weight monitoring, and was not updated with new interventions addressing Resident 732's weight loss. A review of Resident 732's clinical records contained a Nutritional Risk Assessment dated 6/13/25.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety for one of 52 sampled residents (Resident 100) with gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems) when the facility did not follow the physician's order to keep Resident 100's head of bed (HOB) elevated at 30 degrees during tube feeding. This failure increased the risk for Resident 100 to experience aspiration (inhaling liquid, vomit or saliva) and develop pneumonia or lung infection. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 100 was readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and paralytic syndrome (loss of muscle function). A review of Resident 100's care plan revised 1/13/25 indicated resident requires tube feeding related to swallowing problem. The goal of care was for resident to be free of aspiration. The interventions included, The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 52 sampled residents (Resident 82) was provided with respiratory care when Resident 82 was not provided with a functioning continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP, a breathing machine designed to increase air pressure, keeping the airway open when the person breaths in) machine. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 82 experiencing respiratory distress. Findings: During a review of Resident 82's clinical record, the record indicated Resident 82 was admitted in late 2022 with multiple diagnoses including sleep apnea (a sleep disorder where the individual stops breathing for short periods when sleeping) and obstructive sleep apnea (a sleep disorder where the throat muscles relax and block the airway). A review of Resident 82's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 3/21/2025, indicated Resident 82 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess cognition) score of 10 out of 15 that indicated Resident 82 had moderately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for one of 52 residents (Resident 15) when doses of Resident 15's PRN (as needed) pain medications were given without indication. This failure had the potential to increase Resident 15's risk of exposure to side effects and dependence to pain medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 15's admission records, the records indicated Resident 15 was admitted in May 2025 with diagnoses that included Lumbar Spondylosis (the degeneration of bones in the lower back), rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic inflammatory disorder affecting small joints in the hands and feet), lumbosacral radiculopathy (a condition where a nerve root in the lower back is compressed or irritated), and fibromyalgia (causes pain in muscles and soft tissues all over the body). Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool indicated Resident 15 had moderate cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 15's physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. During a review of Resident 579's admission records, the records indicated Resident 579 was admitted in June 2025 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Resident 579's MDS indicated Resident 579 had intact cognition. During a review of Resident 579's care plan, initiated 6/7/25, the care plan indicated, Dialysis: Resident Requires Hemodialysis .and has an AV Fistula (shunt) (left arm) .Avoid taking blood pressure .on the AV site extremity . During a review of Resident 579's physician order, dated 6/12/25, the order indicated, Avoid taking BP [blood pressure] on Left Arm . During a review Resident 579's Weights and Vitals Summary, the summary indicated blood pressures were taken on Resident 579's left arm twice on 6/9/25 and once on 6/19/25. During a concurrent interview and review on 6/27/25 at 8:56 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated, .They are not supposed to check bp on the arm with fistula .not on that arm . The DON confirmed Resident 579 had an order to avoid taking BP on left arm and confirmed BP was taken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1) Daily skin checks were not documented, 2) Bowel and bladder care were not provided at regular intervals. These failures resulted in Resident 1 developing Stage 2 pressure ulcers (partial-thickness loss of skin, presenting as a shallow open sore or wound) on Resident 1's left and right buttocks. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility December 2024 with multiple diagnoses which included Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 1's admission Comprehensive Skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of three sampled residents (Resident 3) in a census of 179 was seen by their physician as required. This failure had the potential for a delay in services and treatment of the resident. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in the winter of 2013 with diagnoses including dementia (a degenerative disorder that affects the mind, memory and behavior), epilepsy (a disorder that causes seizures), depression, cerebellar ataxia (a disorder that causes inability to control muscle movement, which can cause problems with balance and walking) anxiety, hydrocephalus (a buildup of fluids in the brain), and history of falls. During a review of Resident 3 ' s BRIEF INTERVIEW FOR MENTAL STATUS [BIMS] ., dated 8/1/24, the BIMS indicated she had moderate memory loss. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/16/24 at 8:48 a.m. with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN), the LVN was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 received Isavuconazonium Sulfate Capsule (an antifungal medication- used to treat lung infections) every eight hours when the physician's order from the hopsital was to receive the medication one time per day. This failure resulted in Resident 1 receiving 32 extra doses of medication, which increased the potential for adverse systemic effects and jeopardized Resident 1's health. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in mid-2024 with diagnoses which included allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (a fungal infection of the lung), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that damages the airway and other parts of the lung making it difficult to breath) and chronic kidney disease (damage to the kidneys that occurs over time). During a review Resident 1's MEDICATION SUMMARY FOR PATIENT TRANSFER, dated 7/22/24, the medication summary indicated, ISAVUCONAZONIUM SULFATE CAP [capsule], ORAL 372…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care according to professional standards for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) with an indwelling urinary catheter (a thin tube that is inserted into the bladder, held in place by a soft balloon, and used to drain urine) when: 1. There was no active physician order for an indwelling urinary catheter nor was the presence of the catheter included in the plan of care or weekly summary notes. 2. There was no documented evidence of care and management of the urinary catheter and drainage bag according to professional standards. 3. Resident 1's urine collection bag was observed lying on the floor with no privacy cover. These failures, individually and collectively, had the potential for Resident 1 to develop a urinary tract infection (an infection in the system of organs that make urine) which can result in pain, fever, and confusion. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in September 2023 with diagnoses including dementia (impaired ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the Department on a timely manner for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when the Department received the report of alleged abuse the day after the incident occurred. This failure resulted in a delay in the abuse investigation and decreased the facility's potential to protect the resident from harm. Findings: A review of an admission Record for Resident 1 indicated she was admitted in March 2024 with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and unspecified psychosis. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used for care), dated 6/11/24, indicated a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool) score of 12 out of 15 with memory problems. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/24/24 at 12 p.m. with the Social Services Director (SSD) Resident 1's Progress Notes were reviewed, SSD confirmed a nurses' note that indicated an alleged abuse incident involving Resident 1 occurred on 6/18/24 but was reported to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the protection of residents' personal information for census of 179, when tray tickets were thrown into the trash and outside dumpsters. This failure had the potential to place resident personal information at risk for misuse. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/6/24 at 8:47 a.m. with Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) and Assistant Dietary Services Supervisor (ADSS) in the kitchen, the DA 1 was observed stripping the breakfast trays. The DA 1 was throwing the meal tickets into the regular trash along with food scraps. The meal tickets contained the resident's name, resident's ID (medical record number), room number, diet order, food allergies, food preferences, and special instructions. The ADSS stated this was their process for disposing of the meal tickets . During an interview on 5/6/24 at 8:55 a.m. with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) in the kitchen, the DSS stated there was no other method of disposing of meal tickets. During an interview on 5/8/24 at 3:04 p.m., with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to adequately maintain pharmacy services for 3 out of a census of 185 when: 1. An injectable Emergency medication box with a fill date of 2/29/24 was found to be opened and unsealed without proper documentation and not replaced within 72 hours; 2. An Emergency medication E-kit (a box with a supply of medications that may be used for residents when pharmacy services are not available) in the refrigerator was accessed and used without proper documentation when one used lorazepam (a medication used to treat mood disorders) injectable medication was not documented; 3. Prescription medication for 3 residents (Resident 97, Resident 114, and Resident 7) were not available at the time of administration; and, 4. A dose of lacosamide (a medication given for seizures) was given and not signed on out by the LN (Licensed Nurse). This failure had the potential to cause inaccurate accountability of controlled medications, unauthorized individuals' access to controlled medications and worsening of the resident's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and labeled, when: 1. A partially used Multi dose inhaler was found without an open date label in a medication cart; 2. Two partially used glucose test strips containers without an open date label were found in two medication carts; 3. An intravenous IV antibiotic bag was found on one of the medication carts in the narcotic binder, accessible to residents and unauthorized individuals; 4. A medication cart was left unlocked with one of the drawers open, with four medication blister packs on top accessible to residents and unauthorized individuals; 5. The medication refrigerator was left unlocked with an unlocked medications box inside for controlled medications; and, 6. Five loose pills were found in three medication carts. This failure had the potential for residents to receive medications with unsafe or reduced potency from being used past their discard date or improper storage, and misuse of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conserve the nutritive value and flavor of pureed foods for 17 out of 179 residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 17, Resident 26, Resident 30, Resident 37, Resident 52, Resident 56, Resident 69, Resident 74, Resident 86, Resident 133, Resident 470, Resident 570, Resident 571, Resident 572, and Resident 573) when the recipes were not followed. This failure had the potential for malnutrition, weight loss, slow wound recovery, and vulnerability to diseases. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/7/24 at 9:45 a.m. with the [NAME] in the kitchen, the [NAME] was observed preparing the pureed foods for the lunch, including pasta and meat balls. No recipe or measuring tools were seen on the counter as the [NAME] set food items into the blender. During the preparation of pureeing the pasta, the cook added an unmeasured amount of pasta and pasta water to the blender before mixing. During the preparation of pureeing the meatballs, the cook added an unmeasured amount of meat and the cooking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for a total of 179 residents who received facility prepared foods when: 1. Milk and eggs were stored only 1.5 above floor level; 2. Opened food items were not sealed in the dry storage area; 3. Food products were not labeled to ensure food safety; 4. Kitchen floors contained build-up of black grime, broken tile, and walls with chipped paint; 5. Unsafe kitchenware stored and available for use; 6. Emergency food was not monitored to ensure safety; and, 7. Resident refrigerator log in C3 showed two days of recordings above safe food storage range without corrective actions. These failures had the potential to lead to contamination and/or food borne illness. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/6/24 during the initial kitchen tour at 8:15 a.m., the walk-in refrigerator contained a ledge consisting of two stacked wooden slats sitting approximately 1.5 above the floor, running along the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when: 1. Certified Nurse Assistant 3 (CNA 3) did not wear the proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while giving care to Resident 12 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and did not perform hand hygiene in between tasks of providing care and collecting garbage; and, 2. Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2) did not disinfect the glucometer (a device used to measure blood sugar) according to manufacturer's recommendation during a medication pass observation. These failures increased the risk of spreading infection at the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 12's admission Record indicated she was originally admitted to the facility in November 2021 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (adult-onset diabetes characterized by high blood sugar and insulin resistance) with chronic foot ulcer. A review of an Order Summary Report dated 1/22/24 indicated Resident 12 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow its own policy for medication self-administration for one of 36 sampled residents (Resident 422) when the facility did not obtain a physician's order for Resident 422 to self-administer medications. This failure had the potential to result in an unsafe medication self-administration. Findings: A review of Resident 422's admission Record indicated she was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including the presence of intraocular lens to both eyes. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/6/24 at 8:40 a.m. inside Resident 422's room, observed Resident 422 instill own eye drops after Licensed Nurse 16 (LN 16) handed her the vial of a single use eye drop. Resident 422 was not instructed to do hand hygiene before administration and stated she wanted to reuse the used vial. A review of Resident 422's Order Summary Report, dated 4/26/24, indicated an order for cyclosporine emulsion 0.05% (eye drop medication for dry eyes due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change of Status Assessment (SCSA) was completed within 14 days after discharging from Hospice Care (end of life care) for one of 36 sampled residents (Resident 97). This failure decreased the facility's potential of providing appropriate care and services to Resident 97 based on his current status. Findings: A review of Resident 97's admission Record indicated he was admitted in 2/24 with diagnoses including bladder cancer. A review of Resident 97's Order Summary Report, dated 4/10/24, indicated Resident 97 was admitted to Hospice Care due to bladder cancer. A review of Resident 97's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 4/14/24, indicated an SCSA was initiated and completed due to admission to Hospice Care and a change in cognition. A review of a document titled, Revocation of the Election of Hospice Care, dated 4/15/24, indicated Resident 97's family decided to discontinue his enrollment from Hospice Care. A review of Resident 97's MDS assessments indicated no SCSA had been initiated 14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess three of 36 sampled residents (Resident 101, Resident 88, and Resident 143), when: 1. Resident 101's Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) indicated restorative nursing program (RNA; a program to maintain a person's highest level of physical, mental, and psychosocial function) was not performed; 2. Resident 88's MDS assessment did not reflect continuous oxygen use; and, 3. Resident 143's MDS wound assessment was coded inaccurately. These failures decreased the facility's potential to identify residents' care needs accurately. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 101's admission Record, indicated Resident 101 was admitted to the facility in May 2022 with diagnoses including lumbar (lower back) region spondylosis (age-related wear and tear of the spinal disks), muscle weakness and abnormalities of gait and mobility. A review of Resident 101's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated RNA program was not performed in the last seven…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. A record review of Resident 525's admission record indicated Resident 525 was admitted in early May 2024 for aftercare following right hip replacement surgery. A review of Resident 525's OSR for active orders as of 5/9/2024, indicated Resident 525 was prescribed, [Oxycodone] Oral Tablet 5 MG [milligram a unit of measure] .Give 3 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for severe pain . start date 5/2/2024 . An interview on 5/8/24 at 4:07 p.m., LN 12 stated when giving a resident a controlled drug (drugs that can cause physical and mental dependence), nurses are expected to document the time and how many tablets/pills given to the resident on the controlled drug record form as well as document in the resident's electronic health record (EHR). LN 12 added the EHR will indicate the accurate time when the controlled drug was administered to the resident. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/9/24 at 8:34 a.m. with LN 13 and the DON, Resident 525's EHR and progress notes, dated 5/5/24, were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide proper care and services to one of 36 sampled residents (Resident 420) when Resident 420's order for enteral feeding (a method of providing nutrient directly to the stomach or small bowel using a tube) did not include the kind of feeding formula to be infused, its duration, and the mechanism of administration. This failure had the potential to cause an error during administration of the feeding. Findings: A review of an admission Record for Resident 420 indicated he was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including cancer of the tonsils and the presence of a feeding tube. On 5/6/24 at 11 a.m. during an observation inside Resident 420's room, a half-filled bottle of enteral feeding formula was hanging by the side of the bed, which indicated the formula was hung on 5/5/24 at 3:32 p.m. A review of Resident 420's Order Summary Report (OSR) for 5/2/24 indicated an incomplete order for an enteral feeding; the order did not include the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% when a medication was not available for one resident, an extended release medication was crushed, and a chewable aspirin was given and not the delayed release medication. This failure resulted in 3 errors out of 28 opportunities during an observation of medication administration, which resulted in an error rate of 10.71 % for the faclility. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 5/6/24 at 8:26 a.m., with LN 1 (Licensed Nurse), LN 1 was observed preparing Resident's morning medicaions which did not include Phenazopyridine. In an interview with LN 1 on 5/6/24 at 8:30 am, LN 1 stated that the morning dose of phenazopyridine (medication used to treat pain experienced during urination) was not available to be administered with Resident 97's other medications. A review of Resident 97's physician orders, dated 4/10/24, indicated that phenazopyridine 100 mg tablets (mg = milligram, a unit of measure), 1 tablet was to be given every eight hours for dysuria…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect the residents' protected health information (PHI, such as individuals' health, treatment and payment information) visible and accessible to the public when the Kiosk/computer located between resident's room and storage room was left unattended and the computer screen showed information for the census of 179 residents. This failure had the potential for the public to access unauthorized residents' PHI and cause a breach of confidentiality. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/6/24 at 2:35 p.m., with Licensed Nurse 15 (LN 15), LN 15 confirmed the Kiosk/computer screen was turned on, left unattended and showing the resident's PHI. LN 15 stated, residents' information should be protected at all times to prevent unauthorized accessed to their personal information which can be used to other peoples' advantage. LN 15 further stated, We should adhere to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA, federal regulatory standards defining the lawful use protected health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2's) safety when, the resident's bed locks were not completely secured in place. This failure had the potential to contribute to Resident 2's fall and placed the resident at a greater risk for avoidable accidents. Findings: Review of the clinical record for Resident 2, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was a short-term resident in the facility for aftercare of surgery with diagnoses that included spine and thoracic (upper and middle part of the back) region fusion, thoracic vertebra (bones) fracture and morbid obesity. In a concurrent observation and interview on 4/16/24 at 10:38 a.m., Resident 2 was in a wheelchair in his room and stated he had two back surgeries and had come to the facility from the hospital for rehabilitation. Resident 2 reported he fell on his back the previous night because the bed was not secured. The resident recounted the fall incident; he stated he decided to get out of the bed to grab a blanket for himself that was placed at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to manage one of three sampled residents (Resident 1's) pain timely when staff had incongruent (inconsistent) communication regarding the resident's complaint of pain. This failure resulted in Resident 1 having uncontrolled pain and a hospital transfer. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility for aftercare of hip replacement surgery in March 2024. Review of Resident 1's clinical record, Nurse's Notes, dated 3/26/24, documented by Licensed Nurse (LN 2) indicated the resident complained of uncontrolled pain that occurred during physical therapy (PT) that morning. The Nurse's Note documented, [Resident 2] stated he heard a crack and has been hurting since then [PT in the morning]. Called [Name of Doctor] but call failed twice around 1700 [5 p.m.] .Resident and wife wanted him to go to [Name of hospital] .Resident was transferred to [Name of hospital] at 1725 [5:25 p.m.]. Review of Resident 1's clinical record, Medication Administration Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of hazards when one of five sampled residents, (Resident 1)'s, bed malfunctioned and the head of bed dropped suddenly. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing neck pain. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with multiple diagnoses including wedge compression fracture of T11-T12 vertebra (a fracture in the the front of the vertebra located on the thoracic spine) and abnormalities of gait and mobility (difficulty walking). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 3/3/23, indicated she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess cognition) score of 11 out of 14 that indicated she was moderately cognitively impaired. Further review of Resident 1's MDS, Functional Status, dated 3/3/23, indicated she required limited assistance by staff to guide limbs for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the resident specific health condition and the pertinent care needs and services were not identified and addressed. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and resulted in lack of coordination of Resident 1's care with the agency responsible for the protection and advocacy for residents living with developmental disability (DD). Findings: Resident 1 was a long term resident in the facility with developmental disorder and diagnoses that included altered mental status. In a telephone interview on [DATE] at 9:32 a.m., the regional care agency for nursing home residents with DD complained the facility failed to notify them when Resident 1 had changes in condition and/or upon her death. The regional care agency indicated the facility was to coordinate special care and services needed for the residents living with DD but the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-06-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain evidence of the results of any grievances for all residents in a census of 139 when: No record of grievances nor resolutions were retained by facility. This failure had the potential to violate the residents rights to file grievance and have it resolved. Findings: During an interview on 6/23/2021 at 11:25 a.m., the Social Service Assistant (SSA) stated that the Social Service Director (SSD) was the one who kept the Grievance log. SSA stated that SSA only kept the log for missing items. The missing items log was arranged alphabetically and filed one binder per year. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/23/2021 at 1:50 p.m., the SSD stated that they never kept a grievance log. SSD stated that they resolved all the issues from the residents immediately, so they never kept a log. The SSD then stated that they kept the grievance log and the missing items record together. The SSD showed a binder for 2019. Inside the binder were blank grievance forms. There was no documentation of grievances…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions when: 1. Kitchen staff unable to explain the manual three-part sink dish washing steps; 2. Dusty fan by window with sill that had build-up of gray/black particles, leaving black smudge on finger when wiped; 3. Screen for kitchen window found with gap, allowing pest entry; 4. Dented cans found in canned good section for use.Food not properly cooled; 5. Floor under shelves in dry food storage with grayish, black build-up and was rough to touch; 6. Kitchen floor found with broken tiles; 7. Dishwasher not found with air gap; 8. Food not properly cooled. These failures had the potential to increase the risk of food borne illness for 139 residents receiving food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During an observation, interview and record review on 6/22/21 at 9:55 a.m., during initial tour, the Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) was unable to explain the sanitation steps in the manual dish washing process. The Director of Dietary Services (DDS) acknowledged that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-06-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly in order to prevent the harborage of pests when the dumpster lid was left open. This failure increased the risk of an unsanitary environment due to the potential for flies and rodents on facility grounds. Findings: During an observation and interview on 6/22/21 at 4:04 PM, the dumpster lid was propped open with the stick, though no one was throwing away garbage. The DDS stated that the kitchen trash was left on a trolley outside of the kitchen for housekeeping, as housekeeping had responsibility over the dumpsters. During an interview on 6/24/21 at 9:38 AM, the Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) stated that the expectation was the dumpster lids were kept shut when trash was being stored. Review of the Food and Drug Administration 2017 Food Code, outside receptacles must be constructed with tight-fitting lids or covers to prevent the scattering of the garbage or refuse by birds, the breeding of flies, or the entry of rodents . Storing Refuse, Recyclables, and Returnable further explains that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for residents, staff, and the public, when carpet throughout the facility was damaged. This failure had the potential to cause fall related injuries to residents. Findings: During an observation on 6/22/2021 at 2:00 p.m., the carpet at the intersection between the 300 and the 400 room hallways was ripped and frayed which created an uneven surface. During an observation on 6/24/2021 at 9:20 a.m., the carpet at the intersection of Nursing Station 1 was ripped and frayed with gray duct tape on some of the surrounding carpet which created an uneven surface, and the carpet at the intersection of the main entrance and the dining room was ripped which created an uneven surface. During an observation on 6/24/2021 at 12:30 p.m., the carpet was bulging up at the entrance of room [ROOM NUMBER] and between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. During an interview with Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3) on 6/24/2021 at 11:22 a.m., LN 3 stated, I have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store medications in accordance with their policy and federal laws when: 1. An unlocked and unmonitored refrigerator, which contained an expired biological product, was found in a conference room; and 2. A drawer used to store controlled medications for disposition did not have a lock that sufficiently secured the drawer to prevent diversion. These failures had the potential for residents to have received a biological product that was less potent and increased the risk of unauthorized people having access to controlled medications with a high probability for abuse. Findings: 1. During an observation on 6/22/21, at 9:12 a.m., in the facility conference room, there was an unlocked mini refrigerator. The refrigerator contents were as follows: a multi-dose vial of Tuberculin (a biological product used to test for tuberculosis; a bacterial infection) with an opened date of 1/26/21; two containers of Med Pass (a nutritional supplement); one container of lemon flavored thickened water, one bottle of Glucerna (a meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-25 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for Dementia (a general term to describe a group of symptoms related to loss of memory, judgment, language, complex motor skills, and other intellectual function) for one resident (Resident 117), that was person-centered and supportive of Resident 117's needs. The facility failed to develop care plan interventions to reduce Resident 117's confusion, which had the potential to cause the resident anxiety and an inability to achieve her highest level of functioning. Findings: During a review of Resident 117's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) on 6/24/2021 at 8:50 a.m., she had the following diagnoses: History of strokes (when blood supply to part of your brain is interrupted or reduced, preventing brain tissue from getting oxygen and nutrients); Dementia with behavioral disturbances; and Alzheimer's disease (an irreversible, progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks). She also had a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of two residents (Resident 34 and Resident 144) in a census of 139 when: 1. Resident 34's prescription for lorazepam (a medication used to treat an active seizure) was expired and available for use in the medication refrigerator; and, 2. Resident 144 did not receive his morning dose of finasteride (a medication used to treat urinary retention) due to the medication not being available. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 34 receiving a medication that was no longer effective at treating his seizures, and Resident 144 experiencing discomfort. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 34's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility in 2014 with diagnoses, which included epilepsy (a neurological disorder marked by sudden recurrent episodes of sensory disturbance, loss of consciousness, or seizure, associated with abnormal electrical activity in the brain). Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HUDSON RIVER OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/2019
BAY BRIDGE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/15/2014
CHEEMA, CHANDANDEEPIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/15/2015
TERRY, DAVIDIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/01/2022
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$34.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 12%Medicare 19%Other / private 69%

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$516per resident / day
operating cost
$15,672per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$558per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055886. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next