McKinley Park Care Center
3700 H Street, Sacramento, CA 95816 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 86 certified beds · (916) 452-3592 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 14.4% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.8% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.8% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.5% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.6% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.6% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.3% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.92 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.47 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 123 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.5%CMS range 45.7–65.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 8.5–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 58.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 90.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.5–11.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 77.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow proper food storage, hygienic dish handling and hand hygiene techniques in the kitchen when:Undated and unlabeled raw green squash were observed in the kitchen food refrigerator; Kitchen staff stacked wet meal tray lids on top of one another before allowing them to dry;Kitchen staff failed to follow proper hand hygiene during handling of soiled dishes during dishwashing; and,Kitchen staff failed to follow proper hand hygiene during food preparation.These failures had the potential for all 77 residents in the facility to receive expired food, place all residents at risk for food-borne illness related to improper hand hygiene and place all residents at risk for exposure to possible biological growth on wet meal tray lids.1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/20/26 at 7:59 a.m., with Dietary Manager (DM), in the kitchen, unlabeled and undated raw green squash was observed in a stainless steel container in the food refrigerator. Approximately 11 raw whole green squash were observed in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool) assessments for 10 of 13 sampled residents (Resident 22, Resident 35, Resident 36, Resident 5, Resident 45, Resident 48, Resident 49, Resident 4, Resident 83, and Resident 92) were completed within the required timeframe, for a census of 77.These failures increased the potential for care plans not to be updated to reflect resident's current condition. A concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) on 1/22/26 starting at 2:34 p.m. The MDSC stated the facility has 14 days after Assessment Reference Date (ARD-look back or observation period) to complete the assessments and 14 days to transmit once the assessment was completed. The MDSC confirmed the following information:-Resident 22's quarterly MDS assessment with ARD on 12/14/25 was due to be closed and locked on 12/27/25. The MDSC confirmed the assessment was completed and transmitted on 1/21/26 and the assessment was late;-Resident 35's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool) assessments for 13 of 13 sampled residents (Resident 22, Resident 24, Resident 35, Resident 36, Resident 5, Resident 45, Resident 48, Resident 49, Resident 4, Resident 82, Resident 83, Resident 92, and Resident 6) were completed and transmitted within the required timeframe, for a census of 77. These failures had the potential for residents not to receive individualized plan of care based on their specific needs. A concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) on 1/22/26 starting at 2:34 p.m. The MDSC stated the facility has 14 days after Assessment Reference Date (ARD-look back or observation period) to complete the assessments and 14 days to transmit once the assessment was completed. The MDSC confirmed the following information:-Resident 22's quarterly MDS assessment with ARD on 12/14/25 was due to be closed and locked on 12/27/25. The MDSC confirmed the assessment was completed and transmitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow therapeutic diets (a nutritionally tailored meal plan prescribed by a physician and planned by a dietitian to treat, manage, or prevent specific medical conditions) for four of 77 residents who receive meals from the kitchen (Resident 44, Resident 78, Resident 90, and Resident 94).These failures had the potential to cause negative health outcomes for Resident 44, Resident 78, Resident 90, and Resident 94.During an observation on 1/21/26, at 11:53 a.m., during tray line (the placing of prescribed diets on residents meal trays) in the kitchen, Dietary Aid (DA) 1 did not place the fortified diet (a prescribed diet, deliberately increasing the calorie and protein density of regular meals to combat involuntary weight loss and malnutrition) item (2 individual packs of margarine) on Resident 78's lunch tray. DA 2 placed the tray onto the tray cart without the fortified item. Resident 78's meal tray ticket (piece of paper which contains the ordered therapeutic diet with the residents name, allergies, and food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection prevention and control standards and provide a safe and sanitary environment for census of 77 residents, when:Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-an infection control policy to reduce transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms, MDRO, using personal protective equipment, PPE, for residents with wounds, indwelling devices, or known colonization with specific pathogens) were not followed when performing resident care for Resident 94; and,Sanitary conditions in the laundry were not maintained and the cover for the carts were not in good condition. These failures had the potential to result in the spread of infection among residents and staff. 1. A review of Resident 94's admission Record, indicated Resident 94 was admitted to the facility in November 2025 with multiple diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by chemical imbalance, organ failure, or infection causing confusion or altered consciousness), orthopedic aftercare (care after surgery including care for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment is a mandatory, standardized clinical evaluation of residents in U.S. Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes, assessing their overall health, functional abilities like activities of daily living, cognition, mood, diagnoses, and preferences to create individualized care plans and ensure quality) timely for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 82). This failure had the potential for Resident 82 to not receive quality care. During a concurrent interview and record review with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) on 1/22/26, at 3:15 p.m., Resident 82's MDS assessments were reviewed. Resident 82's annual MDS assessment ARD (assessment reference date: 14 days after the resident is admitted ) indicated 12/4/25. MDSC stated, Resident 82's annual MDS assessment was due to be completed on 12/18/25 which is 14 days after the ARD, and it was completed on 1/20/26. MDSC stated, the annual assessment was late. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on 1/23/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a significant change in status assessment (SCSA- a comprehensive assessment that needs to be completed when the interdisciplinary team determined resident meets the guidelines related to improvement or decline in condition) was completed within 14 days from the time the change was identified for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 24). This failure increased the potential for Resident 24 to not receive appropriate care. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 24 had a diagnosis of palliative care (specialized medical care focusing on providing relief of pain and symptoms of serious illness) in June of 2025. A review of Resident 24's HOSPICE DISCHARGE SUMMARY indicated effective end of day on 12/4/25, Resident 24 was discharged from Hospice due to .stabilized & no longer meets criteria. During a concurrent interview and record review with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) on 1/22/26 at 3:07 p.m., the MDSC stated Resident 24 came off from Hospice on 12/5/25 and a SCSA was scheduled on 12/12/25. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care for one of twenty-two sampled residents (Resident 9) when Resident 9 received a dose of medication that was ordered for another resident (Resident 40).This failure had the potential to result in Resident 9 experiencing adverse effects from receiving a medication not ordered for her. A review of Resident 9's admission Record indicated Resident 9 was initially admitted to the facility in January 2025 and readmitted in December 2025 with multiple diagnoses including cellulitis (bacterial skin infection) of left lower leg, lymphedema (tissue swelling caused by accumulation of fluid due to damaged or blocked lymph nodes), and dyspnea (difficulty breathing). A review of Resident 40's admission Record indicated Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in December 2025 with multiple diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by chemical imbalance, organ failure, or infection causing confusion or altered consciousness), pressure ulcer (damage to skin and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's fingernails were maintained in a clean and trimmed manner for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 7), when Resident 7 was observed with long, untrimmed fingernails.This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 7's psychosocial well-being and placed him at risk for skin injury leading to infection. A review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 7 in the beginning of 2025 with multiple diagnoses, which included Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system that affects movement, balance and muscle control, characterized by tremors, stiffness, slowness, and balance issues) and left-sided hemiplegia (paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk).A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 1/9/26 indicated that Resident 7 had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS section of functional assessment indicated that Resident 7 required maximum assistance with grooming and personal hygiene.A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment was free of accident hazards, received adequate supervision and safe use of mechanical lift (used in transferring resident from bed to chair or vice versa) for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 77), when Resident 77 was not safely transferred using a mechanical lift.This failure placed Resident 77 at risk for serious injuries, including fall, harm, or death and had the potential to affect Resident 77's psychosocial well-being.A review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 77 in the summer of 2025 with multiple diagnoses, which included right-sided hemiparesis and hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk), left leg below the knee amputation, and muscle weakness.A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 10/27/25 indicated that Resident 77 was cognitively intact. The MDS section of functional assessment indicated that Resident 77 required maximum assistance with all ADLs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided according to professional standards for three of 22 sampled residents (Resident 104, Resident 42, and Resident 27) when:Resident 104 and Resident 42's nebulizer masks were not stored in a bag after use;Resident 42's BiPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure- breathing device providing higher pressure when breathing in to help open the lungs and a lower pressure when breathing out making it easier to exhale) order was incomplete; andResident 27 did not have an order for CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure - treatment for obstructive sleep apnea) in the clinical record and CPAP was not used until over one month after admission to the facility. These failures increased the risk for Resident 104 and 42 to develop respiratory infections due to improper storage of masks, and for Resident 42 and Resident 27 to experience respiratory distress and discomfort.1a. A review of the admission Record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management in accordance with professional standards and resident centered care plans for two of 22 sampled residents (Resident 73 and Resident 18) when:The facility failed to reassess Resident 73 for pain within the required one-hour timeframe after receiving a PRN (as needed) pain medication.The facility failed to consistently assess Resident 18's pain and offer non-pharmacological (strategies that do not involve use of pain medications) interventions. These failures had the potential for Resident 73 and Resident 18 to be in pain and have ineffective pain management.1.During an observation on 1/20/26, at 10:49 a.m., in Resident 73's room. Resident 73 was observed to be moaning that her stomach was hurting. During an interview on 1/20/26, at 10:50 a.m., with Resident 73, Resident 73 stated her stomach was hurting and she was constipated. Resident 73 stated she got pain medicine earlier, but she is still in pain. During an interview on 1/20/26, at 11:03 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify trauma triggers for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 83) with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event).This failure had the potential for Resident 83 to experience re-traumatization (re- experience a traumatic event causing similar stress reactions) and possible increased symptoms such as restlessness, irritability and social withdrawal. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 83 was admitted to the facility May of 2022 with diagnoses including schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) and PTSD. Resident 83's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 12/4/25 indicated Resident 83 was cognitively intact. A review of Resident 83's care plan dated 12/31/25 indicated, [Resident 83] has impaired visual function [related to] [Resident 83] stated she lost her eye due to her retina detaching due to res. having diabetes. [Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than five (5) percent (%). The facility had a cumulative medication error rate of 7.4% consisting of two errors for one Resident (Resident 42) in a sample size of 27 opportunities for error.This failure had the potential to jeopardize Resident 42's health and well-being.During a medication pass observation on 1/21/26 at 7 a.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN 3), LN 3 was observed preparing Resident 42's morning medications. LN 3 placed Resident 42's medications, including Ferrous Sulfate (iron supplement for anemia) and Carvedilol (heart failure and blood pressure medication) in a small plastic cup, added less than one teaspoon of apple sauce and administered to the resident. LN 3 explained that the resident prefers to take her medications with small amount of apple sauce. LN 3 did not offer Resident 42 any snacks or food before leaving the resident's room. There was no food observed on Resident 42's bedside table. There were no breakfast trays available in the hallway…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe storage, labeling and effective accountability of the medications in accordance with accepted professional standards, when a bottle of Lyrica (a prescription medication to treat pain; controlled medication with potential for abuse) tablets was stored unsecured on the open shelf in medication room and Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol Inhalation Powder (inhalation medication to treat lung disease and relieve allergic symptoms) for Resident 73 was stored inside Medication Cart 1 not dated when opened.These failures had the potential for controlled substance medication diversion due to lack of secure storage and for Resident 73 to receive expired medication with reduced potency. During an observation and interview with Licensed Nurse (LN 4) in the Medication Room on [DATE] at 7:54 a.m., four paper bags with medications were observed on an open shelf in medication room. LN 4 explained that medications in the bag were brought…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable environment for 14 of 14 sampled residents, when the temperature in the residents' rooms were above 81 degrees Fahrenheit (F). This failure had the potential for the residents to have an uncomfortable room temperature and possible heat exhaustion.During a tour of the facility on 8/15/25 at 4:50 p.m. accompanied by the Administrator (ADM), the following resident's room temperatures were obtained with the facility's infrared (IR) temperature gun (an instrument that measures the temperature by detecting the IR radiation emitted by an object) which indicated the temperatures of the following rooms:room [ROOM NUMBER] - 84 degrees F;room [ROOM NUMBER] - 83 degrees F;room [ROOM NUMBER] - 83 degrees F; androom [ROOM NUMBER] - 82 degrees F. During an interview with the ADM on 8/15/25 at 5 p.m., the ADM indicated the ideal temperature ranges in the facility should be between 71 degrees to 81 degrees Fahrenheit. The ADM stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2025-04-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of four sampled residents from abuse (Resident 2) when another resident (Resident 1) hit Resident 2 on the thigh repeatedly. This failure had the potential to cause injury, fear and distress to Resident 2. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record, Resident 1 was admitted in April of 2025 with a diagnosis of Vascular Dementia (a type of dementia caused by brain damage resulting from impaired blood flow) with other behavioral disturbance. Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission record, Resident 2 was admitted in January of 2024 with a diagnosis of Rhabdomyolysis (a muscle condition manifested by muscle pain, feeling weak and tired) and crushing injury of the left shoulder and upper arm. Resident 2 ' s MDS indicated he was cognitively intact. During a review of a facility submitted document titled REPORT OF SUSPECTED DEPENDENT ADULT/ELDER ABUSE [SOC 341]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat one of five sampled residents (Resident 4) with respect and dignity when Resident 4 stated, through an interpreter, that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 2) was rough, aggressive, and raised her voice when she performed care to Resident 4. This deficient practice had the potential to cause psychological harm and emotional distress to Resident 4. Findings: A review of Resident 4 ' s admission Record, indicated, Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in December 2024, and had diagnosis that included left side hemiplegia (partial or complete paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness), and dysarthria (speech disorder). A review of Resident 4 ' s Brief Interview for Mental Status, Section C, (BIMS, cognitive screening test), indicated, Resident 4 had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 5 ' s admission Record, indicated, Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in November 2024, and had diagnosis that included End Stage Renal Disease (kidney disease) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was updated and revised for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), when the fall care plan was not revised timely after Resident 1's fall. This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent Resident 1 from sustaining another fall and had the potential to result in Resident 1 not attaining his highest practicable well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission records, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in December 2024 with diagnoses that included and hemiparesis hemiplegia (paralysis and weakness of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), and muscle weakness. Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 1's Fall Risk Observation/Assessment, dated 12/11/24, the assessment indicated Resident 1 scored 22, which indicated Resident 1 was high risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards when: 1. Food equipment was not working properly, 2. Employees were unable to state sanitation process, 3. Expired food, food without proper labeling/dating, and foods that were not covered were found in food storage, 4. A dirty lid, and 6 wet containers were found in the ready to use storage area, 5. Worn food preparation equipment that was no longer able to be sanitized was not discarded, 6. Vents and sprinklers over trayline and residents' microwave found dirty, 7. Buckets containing sanitizer found on food preparation counter, and 8. An air gap was not found under the fruit/vegetable preparation sink. These failures had the potential to lead to food borne illness for the 78 residents eating facility prepared meals. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 10/1/24, beginning at 8:20 a.m., Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) was cleaning the pots and pans from breakfast. As she demonstrated the process for putting them through the dish…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with acceptable professional standards of quality for three (3) of 20 sampled residents (Resident 25, Resident 73, Resident 63) when: 1. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, a non-invasive medical imaging technique) prescriber's order for osteomyelitis (a type of bone infection) for Resident 25 was not processed promptly per facility policy. 2. Resident 73's medication order was not clarified with the prescribing physician. 3. Resident 63's feeding formula was not labeled. These failures had the potential for Resident 25, Resident 73, and Resident 63 to received inaccurate and inadequate care. Findings: 1. The following documents were reviewed in Resident 25's medical record: - admission Record, dated 10/1/24 (print date), indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility in August of 2024 with diagnoses including pneumonia (a lung infection) and type 2 diabetes (inability to properly process blood sugar). - A review of prescriber's handwritten orders, dated 9/30/24 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing was provided for a census of 80 residents when: 1. Multiple staff stated the facility was insufficiently staffed; and 2. Resident 55 had five unwitnessed falls in one month. These failures decreased the facility's potential to provide residents with timely, necessary care and services to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/2/24 at 3:44 p.m., with the Staffing Coordinator (SC), the September 2024 staffing spreadsheet was reviewed, the SC stated she writes a schedule to ensure each resident receives a minimum 3.5 hours per patient day (PPD) of direct nursing care. The SC presented the September 2024 staffing spreadsheet which had two columns: projected PPD and actual PPD. The SC confirmed that the projected column indicated how many nursing hours she scheduled and acknowledged 17 of the 29 days on the spreadsheet indicated she scheduled under the goal of 3.5 hours PPD. The SC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food that was palatable when one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 60) was served a burnt cookie. This failure had the potential for Resident 60 to experience dissatisfaction with food served, leading to decreased intake with possible weight loss. Findings: During a concurrent interview and observation on 10/1/24 at 10:35 a.m., in Resident 60's room, Resident 60 stated the food served in the facility is sometimes served burnt. Resident 60 showed a cookie the facility had served her that was black on the bottom. During a concurrent interview and observation on 10/1/24 at 10:45, in Resident 60's room, the [NAME] Clerk 1 (WC 1) confirmed Resident 60's cookie was burnt and stated she would not eat a burnt cookie like that. During an interview on 10/1/24 at 12:51 p.m., Resident 10 stated food provided by facility is sometimes served burnt. An interview on 10/4/24 at 11:08 a.m., the Registered Dietician (RD) stated she was aware the facility had an issue with an oven affecting the foods not being cooked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when: 1. The Treatment Nurse (TN) did not perform hand hygiene (handwash with soap and water or alcohol-based hand rub) in between glove change during the wound dressing change to Resident 70; and, 2. A blood glucose machine was not sanitized after use. These failures had the potential to result in infection and spread of infection among census of 80. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 70's admission Record dated 10/4/24 (print date), indicated resident 70 was admitted to the facility in Summer of 2024 with diagnoses including orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, osteomyelitis (bone infection) and diabetes (inability to properly process blood sugar). A review of Resident 70's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 10/4/2024 indicated, [order start date 8/6/24] right 2nd side MASD [Moisture…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an antibiotics stewardship program for one (1) of 20 sampled residents (Resident 25) when infection screening evaluation was not conducted for Resident 25's two newly prescribed antibiotics to treat osteomyelitis (bone infection). This failure had the potential for antibiotics to be used when it was not indicated and the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Findings: The following documents were reviewed in Resident 25's medical record: - admission Record, dated 10/1/24 (print date), indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility in August of 2024 with diagnoses including pneumonia (a lung infection) and type 2 diabetes (inability to properly process blood sugar). - Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 10/4/24, indicated that on 9/30/24 Resident 25 was started on two different antibiotic prescriptions for right foot osteomyelitis: Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole and Cefalexin. - Review of assessments history indicated latest infection screening evaluation was completed on 8/13/24 [admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident 25) received the pneumococcal vaccine (a medical treatment that helps to prevent or reduce severity of pneumonia, a lung infection). This failure had the potential for the Resident 25 to be at higher risk for pneumonia and related complications. Findings: The following documents were reviewed in Resident 25's medical record: - admission Record, dated 10/1/24 (print date), indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility in August of 2024 with diagnoses including pneumonia (a lung infection) and type 2 diabetes (inability to properly process blood sugar). - Informed consent form signed by resident on 8/13/24 indicated that resident consented to receive pneumococcal vaccination. - Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 10/4/24, contained no orders for pneumococcal vaccine administration. - No records of prior pneumococcal vaccination history were found or provided by the facility. In an interview on 10/3/24 at 12:01 p.m. Infection Preventionist stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-09 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a correct discharge notice to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 received a Discharge Notice for a facility-initiated discharge that did not contain the discharge location, or the updated date of discharge. This failure had the potential to result in an unsafe discharge for Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 for multiple diagnoses including multiple polyneuropathies (disease affecting nerves causing weakness or numbness), paraplegia (paralysis of the legs), right foot drop (difficulty lifting the front part of the foot), and protein calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of food). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 6/1/24, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess cognition) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff had the necessary competencies and skill sets to meet the care and services for two out of five sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 4) when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 transferred Resident 2 using a mechanical lift by herself 2. Nursing staff did not answer resident call lights 3. Resident 4 had to wait for about 15 minutes or longer to get changed. These failures resulted to Resident 2 sustaining a fall and had the potential to result in Resident 4's physical and psychosocial harm. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 2's MDS (an assessment and care screening tool), Section GG-Functional Abilities and Goals (measures resident's performance and independence in various functional tasks related to self-care and mobility), dated 7/24/24, the MDS Section GG indicated, Resident 2 needed the assistance of two or more staff for her chair/bed-to-chair transfer (the ability to transfer to and from a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and homelike environment for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2) when the Resident's personal property was not protected from theft or loss, and it was not promptly investigated. This failure resulted in Resident 2 losing her personal property. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 2 was admitted initially on 6/13/23, with diagnoses that included Hemiplegia (condition where one side of the body is paralyzed), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (condition where the body has high blood sugar levels), hypertension (condition where the blood pressure is high) and hyperlipidemia (condition where there is too much fat in the blood.) During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment and care screening tool), dated 7/24/24, the MDS indicated Resident 2 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS-test to check someone's memory and thinking abilities) score of 15 (score of 15 means a person has no memory problem.) During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective pain management was provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when the facility's licensed staff did not notify Resident 1's physician that the resident's pain medications were not effective. This failure resulted in unnecessary pain for Resident 1, affected his sleep, and had the potential to result in further decline in the resident's overall health condition. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Pain Assessment and Management, with the revision date of 10/22, indicated that the facility was committed to appropriate assessment and treatment of pain based on professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the resident's choices. The policy indicated the facility shall assess for pain on admission, during ongoing assessments, and if the resident experiencing worsening of the pain. The licensed staff should assess the resident's pain, including location, severity, alleviating and exacerbating (increasing intensity) factors, current treatment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure the safety for one resident (Resident 1) of four sampled residents, when Resident 1 eloped from the facility unaccompanied via unmonitored sliding doors and was found in the adjacent office building. This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent physical injury and psychosocial harm to Resident 1 during her unsupervised time away from the facility. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility in October of 2023 with diagnoses which included encephalopathy (a group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction). This admission record also indicated Resident 1 was not her own Responsible Party (RP). A review of Resident 1's discharge paperwork from a recent hospital stay, dated 10/2/23, indicated Resident 1 lacked capacity and had a designated decision maker. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/6/23, indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment. A review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing was provided for a census of 77 residents when: 1. Multiple residents reported long call light response times from facility staff; and 2. Multiple staff stated the facility was insufficiently staffed. These failures decreased the facility's potential to provide residents with timely, necessary care and services to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS: an assessment tool), dated 7/21/23, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in January of 2023, had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS: an assessment for cognition and orientation) score of 13 (indicated cognitively intact), had diagnoses that include Parkinson's disease (causes uncontrollable movements and difficulty with coordination), cervical spinal stenosis (a narrowing of spinal canal in the neck that puts pressure on the spinal cord and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and required assistance for one resident (Resident 4) of five sampled residents when nursing staff did not respond to Resident 4's request for assistance to use the restroom in a timely manner and Resident 4 fell attempting to transfer herself from the toilet to the wheelchair (WC). This failure resulted in Resident 4's fall while attempting to transfer herself from the toilet to the wheelchair. Findings: A review of Resident 4's admission record, indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in March of 2023, and diagnosed with hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body), and right below the knee leg amputation (surgical removal of a limb). A review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS: an assessment tool), dated 9/30/23, indicated Resident 4 had no memory problems with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS: an assessment for cognition and orientation) score of 15, was occasionally incontinent (lack of voluntary control over urination and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-02 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1's use of medical transport service was properly coordinated ahead of time by the Social Services Department. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing anxiety and missing her doctor's appointment. Findings: A review of Resident 1's facesheet (FS) indicated, Resident 1 was last re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included epilepsy (a neurological disorder that results from abnormal activities in the brain with symptoms which include temporary confusion, episodes of staring blankly, jerking and/or twitching of arms and legs) and stiff-man syndrome (a rare and mysterious disorder that makes muscles rigid and painful, especially in the trunk and limbs). A review of Resident 1's interfacility transfer order (IFTO) dated 8/7/23, the IFTO indicated, .General Orders/ Treatment Orders .Follow-up with [Physician's Name (Neurology specialist)] in next 1 month . A review of Resident 1's physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-11-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of the residents for a census of 63 when: 1. The narcotic (medication that may be abused or cause addiction) count sheet for Resident 24 was not filled out after medication administration; 2. Emergency Kit (E-Kit, limited number of medications for use in an emergency) log was not properly filled out for two opened refrigerator E-Kits (E-Kit number 086 and 052) which was missing six vials of lorazepam (a controlled medication used to treat anxiety); and, 3. Opened E-Kits (E-Kit number 067 and 056) were not properly sealed, logged, and replaced within 72 hours. These failures increased the potential for abuse, misuse, or diversion of the controlled substances and not have the needed medications available during emergencies that could jeopardize resident's health and safety. Findings: 1. During an inspection of the Station 3 Medication Cart 2 on 11/1/22 at 11:01 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), the narcotic sheet for Resident 24's oxycodone (pain medication) 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen for a census of 63 residents when there were multiple brown spots on the ceilings and walls near the food preparation area. This failure increased the potential for food contamination from the brown spots dropping onto resident trays. Findings During the initial tour of the kitchen on 11/1/22 at 8:38 a.m. multiple brown areas were observed on the ceiling near the dishwashing station and steam table (tables which keep ready-to-serve food at set temperatures). In an interview on 11/1/22 at 8:40 a.m., the Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed the presence of brown spots on the ceilings by the dishwashing machine and the steam table. The DM stated she did not know what the brown spots were composed of, but they should not be there. During an observation and concurrent interview on 11/1/22 at 8:45 a.m., an inspection of the kitchen near the oven revealed round brown spots on the wall approximately the size of the quarter. The DM stated the Maintenance Director (MD) had installed insulating foam…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection prevention and control practices were followed for a census of 63 when: 1. A reusable blood pressure device was not disinfected between resident use; 2. Hand hygiene was not performed during medication administration; 3. Resident 8's oxygen tubing was undated and unlabeled; and, 4. The facility's water management for the prevention of Legionella disease was not conducted. These failures had the potential to transmit infectious disease among residents. Findings: 1. During a medication administration observation on 11/1/22 starting at 8:14 a.m., the Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) was observed preparing medications for Resident 86 which included blood pressure medications. The LN 1 was observed taking Resident 86's blood pressure prior to giving Resident 86's medications. The LN 1 did not clean the blood pressure machine after using it with Resident 86. After giving resident 86 his medications, the LN 1 proceeded to prepare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0912 — widespreadProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the required minimum square footage of 80 square feet per resident for a census of 63. This failure had the potential to affect residents' safety due to the reduced space for staff to deliver care. Findings: The facility submitted a letter titled, Request for Continuation of Facility Room Waiver, dated 2/19/19 for rooms 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 228, 30, 31, 33, 34, and 35. During general observation of the facility on 11/1/22 and 11/2/22 respectively, the above listed rooms were identified as deficient in square footage. During an interview on 11/3/22, at 11 a.m., with the Registered Nurse Consultant (RNC) and Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the RNC and MS confirmed that rooms 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23 are identical in room size and square footage, rooms [ROOM NUMBER] were identical in room size and square footage, rooms 30, 31, 33, 34, and 35 were identical in room size…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-11-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate maintenance logs for the kitchen dish machine. These failures decreased the facility's potential to ensure sanitation of dishes for a census of 63 residents. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour accompanied by the Dietary Manger (DM) on 11/1/22 at 8:15 a.m., a review of the kitchen's dish machine temperature log for October 2022 indicated there were no entries for 10/26/22, 10/27/22, 10/29/22, and 10/30/22. In a concurrent interview, the DM confirmed the dish machine temperature log was incomplete. A review of the facility's policy titled Dish Washing dated 2018 indicated, .All dishes will be properly sanitized through the dish washer. The dish washer will be kept clean and in good working order .A temperature log (a chlorine log for low-temperature machines) will be kept and maintained by the dishwashers to assure that the dish machine is working properly. This log will be completed each meal prior to any dish washing.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update and revise the care plans for four residents (Resident 31, Resident 124, Resident 75, Resident 22) of 19 sampled residents. These failures resulted in residents' person-centered plan of care not reviewed and revised timely to meet the residents' needs. Findings: A review of a face sheet indicated Resident 31 admitted to the facility in June 2021 with multiple diagnoses which included stroke, hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis due to a brain or spinal cord injury or condition), hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) affecting the left side, contracture of the muscle on the left hand, osteoarthritis (wear and tear joint disease), and depression. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment tool) dated 10/12/22, indicated Resident 31 had a mild memory problem. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/1/22 at 11:50 a.m., Resident 31's four fingers were contracted (curled toward the palm) on the left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing standards of practice were practiced for two residents (Resident 31 and Resident 22) of 19 sampled residents when: 1. Licensed Nurses did not follow Resident 31's physician order for a left-hand contracture (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff); and, 2. Licensed Nurses did not monitor Resident 22's use of a boot to prevent pressure injury of the lower extremities. These failures decreased the facility's potential to meet residents' needs and prevent further decline in the use of their upper and lower extremities. Findings: 1. A review of a face sheet indicated Resident 31 admitted to the facility in June 2021 with multiple diagnoses which included stroke, hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis due to a brain or spinal cord injury or condition), hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) affecting the left side, contracture of the muscle on the left hand, osteoarthritis (wear and tear joint disease), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-04 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a communication binder for one resident (Resident 22) of 19 sampled residents for use during the provision of care. This failure decreased the facility's potential to meet Resident 22's ability to communicate her basic needs. Findings: A review of a face sheet indicated Resident 22 was admitted in June 2014 with diagnoses including aphasia (the inability to comprehend or formulate language) and dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning). A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 8/24/22 indicated Resident 22's cognition was severely impaired, was non-verbal, was rarely understood, and sometimes understands. A review of Resident 22's communication care plan indicated, At risk for altered communication related to dementia, Alzheimer's disease [a type of dementia that affects memory, thinking and behavior], depression, and or language barrier speaks, hearing [manifested by]: may miss part or most of message(s) sent. A listed intervention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activity care plan approaches were consistently implemented for three residents (Resident 75, Resident 90, and Resident 22) of 19 sampled residents. These failures increased the risk of deterioration of social and psychological well-being among residents. Findings: A review of a face sheet indicated Resident 75 was admitted in May 2022 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event), and schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly). A review of Resident 75's activity care plan regarding the risk of decreased participation in activities indicated staff was supposed to implement the following, .offer in room [ROOM NUMBER]:1 [one-to-one, when one staff member works with one resident] programming at least three times per week as indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5% for two of 19 sampled residents (Resident 86 and Resident 124) during observation of medication administration when: 1. A wrong medication of Vitamin D3 (a vitamin needed to build and maintain healthy bones) was administered to Resident 86; and, 2. A wrong dose of amlodipine (a medication to treat high blood pressure and heart disease) was administered to Resident 124. These failures resulted in two medication errors out of 27 opportunities which resulted in the facility having a medication error rate of 7.41%. Findings: 1. Resident 86 was admitted to the facility early 2022 with multiple diagnoses which included Guillain-Barre syndrome (a rare disorder in which the body's immune system attacks the nerves causing weakness and tingling in arms and legs). During a medication administration observation on 11/1/22 starting at 8:14 a.m., with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), the LN 1 was observed administering one tablet of vitamin D3, 125 mcg (microgram, a unit of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled, stored, and disposed of consistently according to standards of practice for a census of 63, when: 1. Expired medications were not removed from the medication cart and the medication storage room; 2. Resident's medications were found in medication cups on top of the medication cart; 3. Loose pills were found in the first drawer of the medication cart; 4. Pharmaceutical products were found in the medication cart without an opened date; 5. A bottle of antifungal powder with an unclear and torn label was found in the treatment cart; and, 6. discharged resident's medications were not removed from the treatment cart. These failures had the potential to result in the lack of effectiveness of the medications, increase the potential for medication administration errors and jeopardize residents' health and safety. Findings: 1. During an inspection of the Station 3, medication cart 2 on 11/1/22 at 11:01 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), one bottle of vitamin B 12 100 mcg (microgram, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 42) of 19 sampled residents received assistance to obtain Resident 42's full dentures. This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure Resident 42 was able to properly chew her food. Findings: A review of a face sheet indicated Resident 42 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including mild protein-calorie malnutrition, cognitive communication deficit, and aphasia (the loss of the ability to understand or express speech). A review of a social service note dated 5/6/22, indicated Resident 42 verbalized both of her dentures were left at her home. A review of a physician's order dated 5/22/22, indicated Resident 42 was on a regular diet with mechanical soft texture and thin liquids due to the diagnosis of aphasia. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 6/9/22, indicated Resident 42's thought process was mildly impaired, she did not have natural teeth, and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely replacement for one resident's missing clothing (Resident 338) of five sampled residents. This failure resulted in residents' expression of discontent with the facility's quality of care and negatively impacted his dignity and quality of life. Findings: A review of a face sheet indicated Resident 338 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with multiple diagnoses which included cerebral infarction without residual effect (stroke) and major depressive disorder. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/16/22, indicated, Resident 338 had moderate cognitive impairment. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/2/22 at 8:11 a.m., Resident 338 stated four sets of clothes his family brought him were missing. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/3/22 at 8:15 a.m., the Licensed Nurse 5 (LN 5) stated resident belongings are accounted for on the resident belongings document in the paper chart. A review of a personal items inventory indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 42) of 19 sampled residents was assessed within 14 calendar days of admission to determine her dental needs. This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure Resident 42 was able to properly chew her food and independently feed herself. Findings: A review of a face sheet indicated Resident 42 was admitted in May 2022 with diagnoses including mild protein-calorie malnutrition, cognitive communication deficit, and aphasia (the loss of the ability to understand or express speech). A review of a social service note dated 5/6/22, indicated Resident 42 verbalized both of her dentures were at her home. A review of a physician's order dated 5/22/22, indicated Resident 42 was on a regular diet with mechanical soft texture and thin liquids due to the diagnosis of aphasia. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 6/9/22, indicated Resident 42's thought process was mildly impaired, she did not have natural teeth, and required supervision/cueing with one-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan regarding Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event) for one resident (Resident 75) of 19 sampled residents. This failure decreased the facility's potential to address Resident 75's mental and behavioral care needs. Findings: A review of a face sheet indicated Resident 75 was admitted in May 2022 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, PTSD, and schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly). A review of all care plans indicated no documented evidence a comprehensive care plan was developed to address Resident 75's PTSD. In an interview and record review on 11/2/22 at 3:02 p.m., the Social Services Director (SSD) validated there should have been a comprehensive care plan developed to address Resident 75's PTSD diagnosis but there was none. A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain grooming for one resident (Resident 31) of 19 sampled residents. This failure decreased the facility's potential to meet Resident 31's grooming needs. Findings: A review of a face sheet indicated Resident 31 admitted to the facility in June 2021 with multiple diagnoses which included stroke, hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis due to a brain or spinal cord injury or condition), hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) affecting the left side, contracture of the muscle on the left hand, osteoarthritis (wear and tear joint disease), and depression. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment tool) dated 10/12/22, indicated Resident 31 had a mild memory problem. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/1/22 at 11:10 a.m., Resident 31's fingers on the left-hand were contracted. Both left and right fingernails were untrimmed, dirty with a dark, black substance underneath the fingernails. Resident 31 stated, I prefer them [his fingernails]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 75) of 19 sampled residents was referred to psychiatry services. This failure increased Resident 75's risk for delayed psychiatry evaluations and interventions. Findings: A review of a face sheet indicated Resident 75 was admitted in May 2022 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event), and schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly). A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 5/30/22 indicated Resident 75's thinking process was intact, she had trouble falling/staying asleep or sleeping too much, felt tired, and had a poor appetite and overeating. A review of Resident 75's physician's progress notes dated 5/24/22 indicated [psychiatry follow-up]. A review of Resident 75's medical chart indicated no documented evidence Resident 75 was referred to psychiatry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 86) of five sampled residents was provided a cock-up wrist splint with adaptive feeding handle (an assistive device enabling a resident with weak grasp to hold eating utensils). This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure a resident's ability to reach their highest potential physical and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: A review of a face sheet indicated Resident 86 was admitted to the facility in April of 2022 with multiple diagnoses which included Guillain-Barré syndrome (a condition in which person's own immune system harms their body's nerves causing muscle weakness and sometimes paralysis). A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 8/5/22, indicated Resident 86 was cognitively intact and required set up and one-person physical assist for meals. A review of an occupational treatment encounter note dated 4/29/22 at 3:06 p.m. indicated, .Skilled interventions to facilitate independence with Self Feeding abilities included adaptive equipment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect resident health information when meal tickets were disposed of in the facility's regular trash. These failures decreased the facility's potential to protect sensitive health information for a census of 63 residents. Findings: During a tour of the kitchen on 11/4/22 at 1:36 p.m., the Dishwasher (DW) was seen removing trays from the soiled tray carts to prepare them to be washed. The DW sorted the tray contents and threw residents' meal tray tickets into the garbage can along with scraps of food. During a concurrent interview with the DW she stated residents' meal tickets are thrown into the garbage with food scraps. An observation of the contents of the garbage can included Resident 8, Resident 180, and Resident 181's meal tickets. The DW confirmed the name, room number, diet order, allergies, and likes and dislikes were visibly clear to read. The DW confirmed there were no locked confidential information bins for the disposal of residents' meal tickets. In a subsequent interview on 11/4/22 at 1:45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet (sq ft) per resident in 8 resident rooms.This failure had the potential to affect residents' care and residents' quality of life. A review of the facility's room measurements conducted on 1/20/26 indicated: room [ROOM NUMBER]- 156 sq ft- 2 residents- 78 sq ft per residentroom [ROOM NUMBER]- 154 sq ft - 2 residents-77 sq ft per residentroom [ROOM NUMBER]-156 sq ft-2 residents-78 sq ft per residentroom [ROOM NUMBER]-230 sq ft-3 residents-76.7 sq ft per residentroom [ROOM NUMBER]-228 sq ft-3 residents-76 sq ft per residentroom [ROOM NUMBER]-238 sq ft-3 residents-79.3 sq ft per residentroom [ROOM NUMBER]-220 sq ft-3 residents-73.3 sq ft per residentroom [ROOM NUMBER]-223 sq ft-3 residents-74.3 sq ft per resident During an interview on 1/20/26 at 8:07 a.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated the facility does not have a room waiver in place for rooms that have less than 80 sq ft per resident. The ADM stated he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUDSON RIVER OPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/01/2019 |
| BAY BRIDGE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 08/15/2014 |
| SANDHU, HARKESH | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 05/01/2016 |
| ESPINOSA, RAUL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/22/2024 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $689K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555122. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.