Mid-Town Oaks Post-Acute
2600 L Street, Sacramento, CA 95816 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (916) 321-9440 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $15,593 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-14)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.9% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.5% | 98.2% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.5% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.2% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.9% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.2% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.90 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.30 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 150 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 63.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.9%CMS range 53.8–67.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 8.1–14.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 60.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 82.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.8%CMS range 6.2–14.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.20 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 96.0 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-09-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 15) when Resident 15 did not receive preventative treatment (low air loss mattress- a mattress designed to distribute body weight over a large surface, used to help prevent skin breakdown) to prevent pressure ulcer (PU-injury to the skin and underlying tissue from prolonged pressure on the skin). This failure resulted in Resident 15 developing a Stage 4 (full thickness skin loss, wound can extend to muscle and bone) pressure ulcer to her sacrococcyx area (tailbone area). Findings: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included right femur fracture (broken thigh bone), difficulty in walking, pressure-induced deep tissue damage (purple or maroon localized area of discolored intact skin due to damage from pressure) to sacral region (tailbone area), Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that affects memory). During a record review of Resident 15's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the privacy of one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's private health information was entered into Resident 2's chart. This failure gave Resident 2 access to Resident 1's personal health history.Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in early 2026 with diagnoses that included brain dysfunction caused by a chemical imbalance, anxiety, depression, back pain, and a urinary tract infection.Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in early 2026 with diagnoses that included degenerative joint disease in the knee and difficulty walking.During a review of Resident 2's electronic health record (EHR), the EHR included an entry dated 2/6/26 by a nurse practitioner (NP). The NP entered a progress note for Resident 1 into Resident 2's EHR, which included Resident 1's name, date of birth , medical history, medical diagnoses, physical examination information, and treatment plan.During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/14/26 at 11:34 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Department for one of six sampled residents (Resident 3) when Resident 3 told staff that Resident 4 threw a comb at him, striking him in the head. This failure had the potential for an allegation of abuse not being investigated.Findings:Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in early 2025 with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, difficulty walking, and muscle weakness.During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 1/29/26, the MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgment status of the resident) score of 15/15, which indicated no cognitive impairment.Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in late 2025 with diagnoses that included difficulty walking and deafness.During a review of Resident 4's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS showed a BIMS score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the order for Restorative Program (designed to help residents maintain their highest level of physical function and prevent decline after rehabilitation) was followed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience further decline in mobility and function.A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted early January 2026 with diagnoses including bilateral primary osteoarthritis (progressive condition causing pain, stiffness, swelling and reduced mobility) of knee and difficulty in walking.A review of Resident 1's RNA (Restorative Nurse Assistant) program indicated the following orders:- an order for RNA ambulation/mobility program (3-5 days a week) FWW (front wheel walker) for 50-100 feet as tolerated on 2/27/26;-an order for exercises UE/LE's (upper extremity/lower extremity), FWW/SPC (single point cane) ambulation 3x a week on 3/19/26;-an order for RNA ambulation/mobility program (3-5 days a week) FWW for 50-100 feet as tolerated with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control and prevention practices when staff provided care to residents under contact isolation without the use of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for two out of five sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure increased the potential for the spread of infections among residents for a census of 97.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 2/27/26 (print date), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in May of 2025 with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection). During a review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR - a daily documentation record used by a licensed nurse (LN) to document medications and treatments given to a resident) for February of 2026, dated 2/27/26 (print date), the MAR indicated an order for isolation on contact precautions (a type of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the requested medical records within two working days following a written request for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), when electronic copies of medical records were requested on 1/22/26, and the request was fulfilled on 1/27/26, and a second request was made on 2/5/26 and fulfilled on 2/10/26.This failure resulted in the delayed provision of medical records to Resident 1, which decreased the likelihood of Resident 1 making informed medical decisions regarding her care.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission record (AR), dated 2/19/26 (print date), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in early 2026 with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage) of the knees and anxiety (fear, worry) disorder. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 1/9/26, the MDS indicated that Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to monitor and timely address clinical symptoms and complications for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 reported decreased left-hand strength, and when Resident 1 had a broken tooth and developed a tongue ulcer. These failures had the potential for Resident 1 to receive delayed and inadequate care.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record (AR), dated 2/19/26 (print date), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in early 2026 with diagnoses which included osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage) of the knees and anxiety (fear, worry) disorder. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 1/9/26, the MDS indicated that Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/18/26 at 2:41p.m. with Resident 1 in her room. Resident 1 showed her left hand with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure safety for two of six sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2), when: 1. Resident 1 eloped twice to a nearby hospital without facility's knowledge; and 2. Resident 2 eloped from facility and was found outside the front door on the ground near her wheelchair. These failures decreased the facility's potential to maintain residents' safety and prevent injuries. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's Facesheet, indicated he was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by systemic illness rather than direct brain trauma), cognitive communication deficit (impairment in communication due to underlying thinking disruptions), psychotic disorder with hallucinations (severe mental health condition causing a loss of contact with reality). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool), dated 12/1/25, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a current copy of advance directive (a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) was available in the medical records for three out of 31 sampled residents (Resident 47, Resident 10 and Resident 85). This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide health care to residents when incapacitated (a state where you don't have the capacity or ability to accomplish something).Findings: A review of Resident 47's admission Record, indicated Resident 47 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with a diagnosis of cognitive communication deficit. A review of Resident 47's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST), dated 7/2/24, indicated Resident 47's advance directive was not available. A review of Resident 47's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 9/26/25, indicated Resident 47's advance directive was available and reviewed. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 31 sampled residents (Resident 18 and Resident 86) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that alter brain chemistry to affect mood, thinking, and behavior), when:A Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR - tapering of dose to determine if symptoms can be managed at a lower dose or if a medication can be discontinued) was not attempted for Resident 18's olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication used to treat symptoms of psychosis).Resident 86's lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) as needed (PRN; pro re nata) order was beyond 14 days from 9/25/25; andResident 86's sertraline (an anti-depression medication) was administered without a manifestation.These failures increased the residents' potential to receive unnecessary medications.Findings: 1- A review of Resident 18's admission Record, indicated he was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses including psychotic disorder (a severe mental illness causing distorted reality) with hallucinations and recurrent major depressive disorder with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the monthly pharmacist medication regimen reviews (MRR) for two of 31 sampled residents (Resident 18 and Resident 86), when:A Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR - tapering of dose to determine if symptoms can be managed at a lower dose or if a medication can be discontinued) was not attempted for Resident 18's olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication used to treat symptoms of psychosis); Resident 86's lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) as needed (PRN; pro re nata) order was beyond 14 days from 9/25/25; andResident 86's sertraline (an anti-depression medication) was administered without a manifestation.These failures decreased the facility's potential to follow the pharmacist recommendations and prevent residents from receiving unnecessary medications. Findings: 1- A review of Resident 18's admission Record, indicated he was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses including psychotic disorder (a severe mental illness causing distorted reality) with hallucinations and recurrent major depressive disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 46 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were safely stored and secured for a census of 96 residents, when:A medication refrigerator temperature log for December 2025 was found incomplete in the medication room at station-3;An expired and discontinued medication was found inside a medication refrigerator in the medication room at station-3;Eight loose tablets and three loose bubble packs were found in and behind medication cart 2's drawers at station-2; andFour over the counter (OTC) medications were stored insecurely inside Resident 89's room.These failures decreased the facility's potential to safely store and secure medications for its residents. Findings: 1- During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/3/25 at 11:22 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 3 in the medication room at station-3, an incomplete temperature log was observed posted at the door of a medication refrigerator. LN 3 confirmed the refrigerator temperature was not recorded for three days from 12/1/25 to 12/3/25 for the morning shift. 2- During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean environment for a census of 96 residents, when one out of four garbage dumpsters located outside the facility was not closed securely due to a gap between the lids.This failure decreased the facility's potential to maintain a safe environment and prevent pest infestation.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/25 at 10 a.m. with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), four dumpsters used by the facility were inspected. One dumpster's lids did not fully cover the dumpster and had a two-inch gap in the middle. DSS stated the dumpster lid should be replaced.During an interview on 12/3/25 at 2 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated the dumpsters where all the trash was disposed should always be kept closed by ensuring the lids fit properly. DON further stated it was necessary to maintain such a safe practice to prevent pests from entering and potentially spreading disease.A review of the facility's undated policy titled, Food-Related Garbage and Rubbish Disposal,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer a medication according to professional standards of quality for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 86), when Resident 86's metoprolol succinate (a medication used to treat high blood pressure and heart failure) was not administered as ordered by the physician.This failure decreased the facility's potential to follow physician's orders and safely administer medications to residents as prescribed.Findings:A review of Resident 86's admission Record, indicated Resident 86 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with a diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (a long-time high blood pressure weakens the heart and reduces its ability to pump blood effectively).During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/25 at 8:55 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2, LN 2 was observed preparing and administering Resident 86's morning medications. LN 2 stated metoprolol succinate tablet was withheld because Resident 86's blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were lower than the physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of 31 sampled residents (Resident 9 and Resident 61's) environment was safe and free of accident hazards, when: 1. Licensed Nurse (LN) 5 did not check Resident 61's wanderguard (a device that activates sensors on doors to alarm, alerting staff to intervene when wandering residents attempt to elope) functionality; and2. Resident 9 was smoking without supervision.These failures decreased the facility's potential to maintain residents' safety.Findings: 1- A review of Resident 61's admission Record, indicated she was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) with agitation and history of falling. During an observation on 12/2/25 at 2:49 p.m., Resident 61 was observed pacing up and down the hallway going to the nurses' station. Resident 61 was redirected by staff to keep her from wandering to other residents' rooms. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/25 at 3:49 p.m. with LN 5 inside Resident 61's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was consistent with professional standards of practice for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 42), when Resident 42's nasal cannula (NC- a small plastic tube, which fits into the person's nostrils for providing supplemental oxygen) was not changed weekly.This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent the risk of lung infection for Resident 42. Findings:A review of Resident 42's admission Record, indicated Resident 42 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic lung disease causing difficulty breathing) and respiratory failure.During an observation on 12/1/25 at 10:40 a.m. in Resident 42's room, Resident 42 was wearing NC. The NC was labeled with a date of 11/18.A review of Resident 42's Order Summary Report, dated 12/4/25, indicated Resident 42 had an active order for continuous oxygen at one liter (a unit of measurement) per minute via NC and to change NC every Sunday and as needed.During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely store food for a census of 96 residents, when an expired food item was available for use in the facility's kitchen.This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent foodborne illness among residents.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/1/25 at 8:12 a.m. with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) in the kitchen, DSS confirmed a loaf of bread with expiration date of 11/30/25 was stored on the bread rack.During an interview on 12/3/25 at 2 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated kitchen staff should not store expired food items that can be served to residents which might make them sick.A review of the facility's undated policy titled, Food-Related Garbage and Rubbish Disposal, indicated, Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 87's) call light was within reach, when Resident 87 was in bed and could not reach the call light.This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide Resident 87 with assistance when needed.Findings:A review of Resident 87's admission Record, indicated Resident 87 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses including anxiety and inability to sleep.A review of Resident 87's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool), dated 10/27/25, indicated Resident 87 had moderate memory impairment.During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/1/25 at 9:27 a.m. with Resident 87 inside his room, Resident 87 stated he could not reach the call light and could not find it. The call light was hanging off the left side of bed. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/1/25 at 9:34 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) inside Resident 87's room, DON confirmed the call light was hanging off the bed and stated it should have been within…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately document and replace emergency medication kits (E-Kit: a kit/box containing medications and supplies for immediate use during a medical emergency) for a census of 95. This failure decreased the facility's potential for having accurate accountability of emergency medications, availability of emergency medications when needed, and meeting the residents' therapeutic needs. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/4/24 at 9:35 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3) in the medication room on the second floor, it was observed that an intravenous (IV; Injectable medication to be administered into the vein) E-kit was found to be opened on 10/16/24 at 10:25 p.m. LN 3 stated, one liter (L, a unit of measure) of dextrose (a type of sugar solution) was taken out of the E-kit and was not replaced. LN 3 further stated the medication sticker should have been faxed on 10/16/24 to the pharmacy to replace the E-kit and the faxed order should have been documented in a binder in the nursing station.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications and medical supplies were labeled, stored, and disposed of consistently according to the facility's policies and procedures for a census of 95, when: 1. A medication refrigerator was not properly locked in the medication room, 2. Expired pharmaceutical products were found in a medication refrigerator, medication carts, and treatment carts, 3. Prescription pharmaceutical products did not have resident specific labels, and 4. Open date labels were not used to determine expiration dates. These failures had the potential for residents' medication misuse, drug diversion and medication errors and ineffectiveness. Findings: 1. During an observation on 11/4/24 at 9:35 a.m. in the second-floor medication room, the medication room refrigerator was found to be unlocked. During an interview on 11/4/24 at 9:35 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3), LN 3 stated the refrigerator was normally locked, and if not, then someone could have taken the medications and therefore became unavailable for residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed during lunch for a therapeutic diet (a modification of a regular diet to fit a person's particular nutritional needs, which could be related to a medical condition - usually prescribed by a physician), when 10 residents on a pureed diet for a census of 95 were served food that was not consistent with the recipe. This failure had the potential to compromise the residents' nutritional status. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/6/24 at 10:45 a.m. with Dietary [NAME] 1 (DC 1), DC 1 started preparing the pureed diet for 10 residents for a total of 12 servings, with the two extra servings for double portions and a test tray. After boiling the diced carrots, DC 1 confirmed she added 1 ½ cups of chicken broth to the carrots for 12 half-cup servings, which were pureed in a blender. DC 1 acknowledged the consistency of the pureed carrots was runny and stated the mixture would thicken when heated on the steam tray and the consistency of the pureed carrots would be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve pureed food (cooked food that has been processed in a blender) that was suitable to consume, when the kitchen prepared food items with inadequate textures for 10 residents on a pureed diet for a census of 95. This failure had the potential to compromise the residents' medical and nutritional status. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/6/24 at 10:45 a.m. with the Dietary [NAME] 1 (DC 1), DC 1 confirmed she added 1 ½ cups of chicken broth for 12 ½ cup servings (with two extra servings for double portion requests and test tray) of cooked carrots and ran the ingredients through a blender. DC 1 stated the carrot mixture was runny because she expected it to thicken up while placed on the hot steam tray and the consistency would be like mashed potatoes. The carrot mixture was put in a metal serving pan on the steamer tray at 10:50 a.m. and no further ingredients were added before serving. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/6/24 at 11:11 a.m. with DC 1, DC 1 pureed 12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food and maintain proper sanitizing procedures in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for a total of 95 residents, when: 1. Expired food was found in dry storage, 2. Metal serving containers were stacked wet in storage, 3. [NAME] sticky residue was found on the bottom surface of a metal serving container, and 4. Two of three sanitizer buckets contained sanitizers not within required disinfecting ranges. These failures had the potential to lead to contamination and food borne illness among residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/4/24 at 9 a.m. with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), one opened package and two unopened packages of hamburger buns were found expired on the bread rack. The opened bread had an open date of 10/15/24 (the date the bread was taken out of the freezer) with no expiration date written on the label (bread was in dry storage for 20 days). Two unopened hamburger bun packages had open dates of 10/27/24 and expiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control for a census of 95 residents, when: 1. Staff members did not use gowns in rooms with enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, an infection control method that involves wearing gowns and gloves during high-contact interactions); 2. Certified Nursing Assistant 5 (CNA 5) did not use personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing care to Resident 21 in an EBP room; and 3. A clean-linen cart was stored uncovered in the basement. These failures had the potential for the spread and transmission of a communicable disease among residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/4/24 at 9:45 a.m. and 9:55 a.m. with a physical therapist (PT) inside an EBP room, the PT was assisting a resident to transfer from bed to wheelchair without wearing a gown. The PT confirmed he should have used a gown and gloves while in the EBP room. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/4/24 at 9:58 a.m. and 10:01 a.m. with CNA 2 inside an EBP room, CNA 2 was changing the old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 141), when the care plan did not address Resident 141's catheter (permanent catheter, a flexible tube inserted into a blood vessel) treatment services and interventions. This failure decreased the facility's potential to address the residents' individualized and specific needs. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 141 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (a condition when the kidneys gradually lose its ability to filter blood properly). During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/4/24 at 9:45 a.m. inside Resident 141's room, Resident 141 stated staff did not do any dressing change and monitoring for her right upper chest catheter since she was admitted on e week ago. A review of Resident 141's Order Summary Report, dated 11/5/24, indicated there was no order for catheter care and dressing monitoring on the right upper chest. A review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services according to professional standards for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 2), when an anticoagulant (medication that prevent or reduce blood clotting) monitoring was not in place for Resident 2. This failure had the potential to put Resident 2 at risk for having complications due to excessive bleeding. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and cerebral infarction (occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked). A review of Resident 2's Medication Administration Record, dated 11/6/24, indicated Resident 2 was receiving apixaban (medication that decreases the clotting ability of the blood) tablet twice a day. The record did not indicate an order to monitor side effects such as excessive bleeding or bruising. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/6/24 at 12:10 p.m. with Licensed Nurse 4 (LN 4),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was functioning for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 37), when Resident 37 pushed the button for assistance and the call light did not turn on. This failure decreased the facility's potential to assist Resident 37 when needed. Findings: A review of Resident 37's admission record indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses including malignant breast neoplasm (a cancerous breast tumor likely to spread to other body parts) and generalized muscle weakness. A review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool), dated 10/15/24, indicated Resident 37 needed partial to moderate assistance to roll from side to side in the bed. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/4/24 at 10:51 a.m. with Resident 37, Resident 37 was lying on her back at the left edge of the bed and pressing the call light button. Resident 37 stated she had been pressing the call button for few minutes and did not get any response. Resident 37 further stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) right to self-determination was maintained, when the facility canceled Resident 1's medical appointment without confirming with the resident or their family. The failure had potential to result in resident not receiving medical treatment and negatively impacting the resident's psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (a document containing patient information), the face sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility August 2024 with multiple diagnoses which included a pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) of the sacral region (near base of the spine) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease where blood sugar is too high). During an interview on 10/24/24 at 1:09 p.m., with Resident 1's daughter, Resident 1's daughter stated the facility canceled the resident's medical appointment on 9/20/24. Resident 1's daughter further stated the facility did not consult with Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, when Resident 1's episode of low blood sugar was not addressed as directed by the management of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) policy and procedure. The failure had the potential to result in Resident 1's hospitalization or death. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (a document containing patient information), the face sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility August 2024 with multiple diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease where blood sugar is too high). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), dated 9/21/24, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was taking high risk medications which could cause hypoglycemia. During a review of Resident 1's active orders in the Orders Summary Report, initiated 9/12/24, indicated, .Finger Stick Blood Glucose (sugar) Testing as needed for Hypo/Hyperglycemia (low blood sugar/high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by a resident for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) when facility staff witnessed Resident 1's hand underneath Resident 2's shirt. This failure resulted in Resident 2 not being free from abuse and had the potential for Resident 2 to feel afraid and scared. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included altered mental status and post-traumatic stress disorder (persistent mental and emotional stress occurring as a result of injury or severe psychological shock). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 8/23/24, indicated Resident 1 had severe impairment in cognition. Resident 1's Face Sheet (a document that has patient information), indicated Resident 1's son was listed as the responsible party. Resident 2 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions). A review of the MDS,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an incident of an injury of unknown origin for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) as required by the regulations. This failure resulted in a delay in the abuse investigation process and decreased the facility's potential to protect patients from physical and psychosocial harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission records, the records indicated Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (memory loss), history of falling, and osteoporosis (bones become weak and brittle). Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment and did not exhibit physical and verbal behaviors towards self and other people. During a review of Resident 1's SBAR [Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation] Communication Form, dated 9/1/24, the form indicated Resident 1 had a fall on 9/1/24. The notes further indicated, With small scrape to left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents' shower room on the second-floor was sanitary. This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide residents with a sanitary bathroom and a homelike environment for a census of 35. Findings: During an observation on 1/12/24 at 10:06 a.m., in the shower room on the second-floor, the following was observed: · Black and brown colored substance around the shower drain. · Black and brown colored substances in the grout between tiles on the floor and walls. · Missing grout in between tiles. · Cracked, broken and missing tiles. During an interview on 1/12/24 at 10:14 a.m. with Resident 3, when asked about the cleanliness of the second-floor shower room, Resident 3 stated, It's disgusting. I don't think it ever gets cleaned .the floor is slimy. During an interview on 1/12/24 at 10:45 a.m. with Resident 5, Resident 5 stated, That shower room could use a good scrub, there's lots of mildew on the tiles. It doesn't look good. During an interview on 1/12/24 at 2:15 p.m. with the Janitor, photos…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1's), dignity and safety was protected when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 threw a juice carton that hit the resident's water bottle, knocking it onto Resident 1. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to feel disrespected when the juice carton hit the resident's water bottle on the bedside table and fell onto Resident 1 in bed. Findings: Resident 1 was a long-term resident in the facility with diagnoses that included a mental disorder with behaviors. Review of Resident 1's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool) indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a score of 14/15 in the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) assessment. In an interview on 1/3/24 at 10:26 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated there was an incident in Resident 1's bedroom during the holidays when CNA 1 stated that she threw a carton of juice into the garbage can but it hit the resident's water bottle instead and fell onto the resident in bed. The DON indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines for 14 residents for a census of 96 when infection control precautions signs were not posted for five out of nine COVID positive rooms, doors were left open, garbage containers were outside of the rooms for nine out of nine COVID positive rooms,and two out of the nine rooms had broken garbage cans, causing staff to touch the lid with gloved contaminated hands to throw away contaminated PPE. These failures had the potential to spread infection and disease among residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: During an observation on 12/13/23 at 10:35 AM, six first-floor rooms that contained COVID positive residents were seen with all their doors opened and garbage cans outside of the rooms contained used PPE. During an observation on 12/13/23 at 10:35 AM, four out of six COVID positive rooms on the first floor were seen not having infection control signs outside the rooms. During an observation on 12/13/23 at 12:44 PM, one out of three COVID positive rooms on 2nd floor were observed not having an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were maintained for 95 residents when: 1. Loose pills and pharmaceutical products were found at the back of bottom drawers of two medication carts, which could result in diversion of the loose medications; 2. An expired medication was available for Resident use in the medication cart, which put Residents at risk of receiving expired or outdated medications; 3. The facility failed to properly label and store all drugs and biological as per manufactures instructions, including expiration dates which put Residents at risk of receiving expired or outdated medication; and, 4. The facility failed to properly storage medications and left medications at the resident's bedside. These failures had the potential to contribute to medication error, unsafe medication use and storage, and diversion. Findings: 1. During an inspection of medication cart 1 on 9/11/23 at 2:56 p.m., 10 loose pills were found in the bottom of the medication cart drawers as well as multiple pharmacy products were found at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement measures to provide a homelike environment for a census of 95 when: 1. The shower room for Nursing Station 1 had discolored grout along several tiles, had broken and missing tiles and was dirty; and, 2. Resident 10's clothing was lost and staff did not follow up in a timely manner to replace them. These failures had the potential to result in residents experiencing an environment that was not homelike. Findings: 1. In a concurrent observation and interview, on 9/11/23 at 9:24 a.m., the Nursing Station 1 shower room had an area with missing tiles on the floor, an area with cracked tiles and the grout around the tiles was brown in color. The floor was dirty and the shower drain was covered with a thick layer of hair. The Director of Staff Development (DSD) confirmed the shower room was dirty, the tiles were in need of repair and stated she would not want to take a shower in the room. In an interview, on 9/14/23 at 11:35 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) agreed the shower room tiles needed to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain resident safety for a census of 95 when: 1. Electrical equipment was in use near water; and 2. Residents were smoking unsupervised and smoking materials were not stored properly. These failures had the potential to jeopardize the health and safety of the residents. Findings: 1. In a concurrent observation and interview, on 9/11/23 at 8:35 a.m., the left side of a large two basin sink in the kitchen contained several tubes of ground turkey thawing in a bus pan with cold water running over the them. A large fan was placed to the left of the sink and was plugged into an extension cord which was kept off the floor by being run through a closed drawer with the plugs hanging in the air. The remainder of the extension cord was extended over to the right of the sink, coiled on the shelf next to the right sink and plugged into the wall outlet. Water was coming from under the sink and pooling on the floor. The Dietary Manager (DM) stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its pharmaceutical policies and procedures for a census of 95 when an expired E-Kit (Emergency-Kit, storage box containing emergency supplies of medication) was not removed and replaced according to facility policy. This failure had the potential to allow administration of expired and ineffective emergency medications. Findings: During a concurrent inspection of medication room [ROOM NUMBER] and interview with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 on [DATE] at 2 p.m., e-kit #30 was found to have been opened on [DATE] at 9 a.m. LN 1 confirmed that e-kit in the medication room was used and needed to be replaced by the pharmacy. A review of documentation found in the e-kit indicated one vial of heparin (medication used to prevent blood cloths) 5000 units (a unit of measure) had been removed on [DATE] at 9 a.m. Other documentation located in the e-kit indicated the LN 2 had not faxed the documentation nor notified the pharmacy, that e-kit #30 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5% for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 9, and 148). 1. For Resident 148, Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 administered Resident's losartan potassium, a medication to treat high blood pressure, not in accordance with the Physicians Order. 2. For Resident 9, LN 2 administered Resident's fluticasone furoate 100 mcg (microgram, unit of measure), umeclinium 62.5 mcg, and vilanterol-25 mcg, a combination of three medications used to treat breathing issues, not in accordance with the Physicians Order. As a result, 2 errors were identified out of 31 opportunities for error during observation of medication administration; the facility medication error was 6.45%. Findings: 1. During an observation of medication administration on 9/11/23 at 8:41 a.m. LN 1 was observed to prepare and administer Resident 148's blood pressure medication. On 9/11/23 at 8:41 a.m. LN 1 administered 50 mg (milligram, unit of measure) of losartan potassium. During an interview on 9/11/23 at 1:45 p.m. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly store, prepare, and serve food and maintain kitchen equipment and sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards for food safety for a census of 95, when: 1.The Certified Nursing Assistant 3 (CNA 3) used a non-microwaveable base and dome to reheat Resident 21's food plate; 2. Undated food products were stored in the freezer and dry storage area; and, 3. Kitchen equipment and floor were not clean and in disrepair. These failures increased the potential for food-borne illnesses among the residents. Findings: 1. A review of an admission record indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/14/23 at 8:20 a.m. with CNA 3, Resident 21 asked CNA 3 to warm her food in the microwave. CNA 3 took Resident 21's food to the staff's break room, covered the food plate with an insulated dome, placed it in the microwave with an insulated base underneath it, reheated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were followed for two of 27 sampled resident (Resident 65 and Resident 5) when: 1. Resident 65's privacy bag was placed on his indwelling catheter (a flexible plastic tube inserted in the bladder to constantly drain urine) after being on the floor; and, 2. No hand hygiene was completely during wound care for Resident 5. These failures had the potential to increase the chance of an infection. Findings: 1. A review of the admission Record, Resident 65 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 with diagnosis that included retention of urine. A review of a facility document titled care plan dated 4/17/23 indicated Resident 65 had an indwelling catheter related to urinary retention at risk for developing complications related to catheter use. During an observation on 9/12/23 at 12:32 p.m. Resident 65 was observed being assisted into a wheelchair. Occupational Therapist (OT) was observed picking up a blue privacy bag from the floor and placed Resident 65's indwelling catheter in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident call light system was properly functioning for seven residents (Resident 19, Resident 24, Resident 33, Resident 35, Resident 44, Resident 70 and Resident 75) of a census of 95 when their call lights were malfunctioning. This failure had the potential to unneccesarily extend the time residents waited to have their call lights answered. Findings: In a concurrent observation and interview, on 9/11/23 at 9:56 a.m., Resident 33 stated his call light was not working properly and that it had been turning on without him pushing it. Resident 33 stated he had been complaining about it for 3 weeks, staff did not know if he really needed something or not and after a while staff just did not come when his light was on. Resident 33 further stated he was diabetic (living with diabetes mellitus, a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) and worried his blood sugar could drop and he would not be able to get assistance. In a concurrent observation and interview, on 9/11/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. A review of an admission record indicated Resident 300 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 300's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score was 13 with good memory. A review of an admission record indicated Resident 297 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (problem in the brain), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with thinking and using language), and bipolar disorder (mental illness). A review of Resident 297's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated BIMS score was 5 with memory problems. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/11/23 at 9:55 a.m. with Resident 300, Resident 300 stated Resident 297 went into her room five times using the shared restroom, kept the restroom's door open while using it, and came naked to her room one time. Resident 300 further stated she felt uncomfortable about Resident 297 continuously coming into her room, got anxious thinking about if he was going to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to effectively implement its grievance policy and procedure for a census of 95 when: 1. The grievance policy was not prominently posted in the facility; 2. The Resident Council President was not aware of how to file a grievance; and, 3. The grievance process was not thoroughly explained to newly admitted residents. These failures had the potential to result in residents not having a process to report concerns related to their care and treatment without fear of threat or reprisal. Findings: 1. In a concurrent observation and interview, on 9/12/23 at 12:51 p.m., the Director of Staff Development (DSD) was asked where the grievance policy was posted and was initially unable to locate it. After speaking to someone on the phone, the DSD located the grievance policy in the top left corner of a locked bulletin board next to the facility's front door. In a concurrent observation and interview, on 9/12/23 at 1:51 p.m., the Social Services Director (SSD) confirmed the grievance policy had not been prominently posted and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA, an assessment that indicates a major decline or improvement in the resident's status) for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 15) when Resident 15 developed a stage 4 (deep wound reaching the muscles, ligaments, and bones) pressure ulcer (PU) to her sacrococcyx (tailbone). This failure decreased the facility's potential to develop a personalized plan of care to prevent a further decline. Findings: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in mid-2022 with diagnoses that included right femur fracture (broken thigh bone), difficulty in walking, and pressure-induced deep tissue damage (purple or maroon localized area of discolored intact skin due to damage from pressure) to sacral region (tailbone area). During a review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 12/20/22, Section M, indicated Resident 15 had no pressure ulcer. During a review of Resident 15's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed timely for two of 27 sampled residents (Resident 15 and Resident 148) when: 1. Resident 15 developed a stage 4 Pressure Ulcer (PU-full thickness skin loss, wound can extend to muscle and bone) was identified; and, 2. Resident 148 did not have a PU care plan. These failures had the potential to result in inadequate care being provided to residents. Findings: 1. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in mid-2022 with diagnoses that included right femur fracture (broken thigh bone), difficulty in walking, and pressure-induced deep tissue damage (purple or maroon localized area of discolored intact skin due to damage from pressure) to sacral region (tailbone area). During a review of Resident 15's Progress Notes, Type: Skin/Wound Note (PN), dated 1/6/23, the PN indicated, .The wound is now 99% intact black eschar [dead tissue]. The eschar is measuring 5cm [centimeter, a unit of measurement] X 3.8cm and is irregular shaped .Pt [patient] is reporting pain in the area . During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. A review of an admission record indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; chronic lung condition) and asthma (chronic lung disease). A review of Resident 25's Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool), dated 7/24/23, indicated Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score was 14 with good memory. During an interview on 9/11/23 at 10:58 a.m. with Resident 25, Resident 25 stated she received her inhaler late and if she did not receive it by 8 a.m., then she will start having chest tightness and wheezing. Resident 25 further stated she had a tight chest this morning because she received her inhaler at 10 a.m. A review of Resident 25's Order Summary Report, indicated Resident 25 started on 7/22/23, to inhale two puffs of budesonide-formoterol fumarate dihydrate (an inhaler used to treat COPD and asthma) two times a day at 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. for COPD. A review of Resident 25's Asthma Care Plan, dated 7/24/23, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide bath/shower as scheduled for one out of 27 sampled residents (Resident 57) when Resident 57 did not get shower as scheduled. This failure had the potential to decrease cleanliness and comfort for the resident. Findings: A review of an admission Record indicated Resident 57 was admitted to the facility in January of 2021 with diagnoses including brain injuries affecting the left side of the body and need for assistance with personal care. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool), dated 8/12/23, indicated Resident 57 required total dependence for full-body bath/shower. A review of the Shower Schedule, Resident 57's shower schedule was on a Tuesday and Friday day-time shower schedule. Resident 57 should have gotten a shower/bath on August 15, 18, 22, 25, 28 and September 1, 5, 8, 12, and 15 of 2023. During an observation on 9/11/23 at 8:50 a.m., Resident 57 was in bed and noted with foul odor. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/13/23 at 8:35 a.m., Resident 57…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide resident centered care and services for two of 27 sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 71) when: 1. The facility did not follow the wound care order for Resident 5; and, 2. The facility did not have the call light within reach for Resident 71. These failures decreased the potential for the residents to receive effective treatment and necessary personal care. Findings: 1. A review of an admission Record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in July of 2023 with diagnoses including diabetes (the body's inability processes blood sugar) and lymphedema (swelling of the upper or lower limb). A review of Resident 5's clinical records included the following documents: A Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 8/28/23, indicated Resident 5 was cognitively intact. A physician order, dated 9/13/23, indicated, Treatment: left plantar [sole of the foot] 5th metatarsal [bone of the foot] diabetic wound cleanse with NS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 63) receive trauma-informed care when his Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event) care plan did not include identified triggers and had not been revised at least quarterly. These failures had the potential to result in the re-traumatization of the resident and lead to unmet nursing needs. Findings: A review of Resident 63's admission record indicated he was admitted in 10/21 with diagnoses including altered mental status and PTSD. A review of Resident 63's Minimum Data Set (MDS, and assessment tool), dated 6/25/23, indicated he had severe memory impairment. A review of Resident 63's clinical record included the following documents: A Social History Assessment, dated 10/12/22, identified Resident 63's PTSD triggers as loud noises, closed doors and lack of sleep. A PTSD care plan, initiated on 10/28/22 and last revised 2/14/23, indicated nursing interventions/tasks to manage a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform an annual evaluation for two employees out of six sampled personnel files. These failures reduced the potential for the facility to evaluate staff performance effectively. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/13/23 at 12:55 pm., the Director of Staff Development (DSD) reviewed the employee's file for Licensed Nurse 12 (LN 12) and Certified Nursing Assistant 8 (CNA 8) and confirmed the annual employee evaluation was past due. A review of an undated facility's policy titled, Performance Evaluations, indicated, A performance evaluation will be completed at least annually.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 21) of 27 sampled residents was free from an unnecessary psychotropic medication (drug prescribed to affect the mind, emotions, or behaviors), when Resident 21's: 1. Indication/rationale for psychotropic medication was not documented and clinically justified; and 2. Behavioral symptoms were not monitored while receiving the psychotropic medication. This failure increased the facility's potential to administer unnecessary psychotropic medications to residents. Findings: 1. A review of an admission record indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression and anxiety disorder. During an observation and interview on 9/11/23 at 10:43 a.m. with Resident 21, Resident 21 was smiling and talking with her roommate while lying comfortably in bed. Resident 21 did not express any episodes of sadness, depression, loneliness, or thoughts of feeling useless. A review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage was properly contained for a census of 95 when one out of five dumpsters was not closed and the surrounding area was littered with trash. This failure had the potential to expose the facility environment to odors, pests and diseases. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 9/12/23 at 7:50 a.m., one of five facility dumpsters was open, a sticky brown substance was on the ground surrounding the dumpster, several plastic cups, blue gloves, plastic bags, papers, a juice box and other litter were noted on the ground behind the dumpster. The Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed one dumpster had the lid propped open and confirmed there was trash on the ground around the dumpsters. The DM stated, the lid should have been closed and there should not have been trash around it or it can attract rodents and flies. During an interview on 9/14/23 at 8:28 a.m. with the Registered Dietician (RD), the RD confirmed, The lids of the trash should be closed and no debris around. During a review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity and respect was maintained for one resident (Resident 2) in a facility census of 89, when a registry (temporary contract employee) Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) verbally demeaned her and did not provide her care properly and in a dignified manner. This caused Resident 2 to be tearful, afraid, and not wanting the CNA to assist in changing the soiled diaper This failure had the potential to diminish Resident 2's self-worth and self-esteem. Additionally, being left lying in urine or stool for an extended period increased the risks for compromising her skin integrity. Findings: During an interview on 8/14/23 at 12:39 p.m. with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated on the night shift of 8/9/23, a registry CNA was being rough with her during her diaper changes and pulling on her left arm which has limited use due to a stroke (a medical condition which can cause paralysis) on two occasions. On the second occasion, she stated the CNA spoke to her rudely and disrespectfully and said, I am not your maid!…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate life saving measures, Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and call 911 (emergency personnel) immediately upon determining one of three sampled full code residents (Resident 1) was unresponsive and not breathing. This failure had the potential to contribute to Resident 1's death and put other residents who are full code at risk for delayed intervention in an emergency situation. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in early 2023 with diagnoses that included polyneuropathy (weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage), generalized muscle weakness and type 2 diabetes (a disease that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). During a record review of Resident 1's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST), dated [DATE], Resident 1's POLST indicated, Attempt Resuscitation/CPR .Full Treatment - primary goal of prolonging life by all medically effective means. During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-12-04 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing information was posted daily for a census of 96 residents, when staffing information was not updated for two days during the weekend.This failure decreased the facility's potential to have staffing information available for residents and visitors.Findings:During an observation on 12/1/25 at 7:07 a.m. near the facility's main entrance door, the posted staffing information was found with a date of 11/28/25.During an interview on 12/3/25 at 9:35 a.m. with Staffing Coordinator (SC), SC stated the supervisor during the weekend should have updated the staffing information. SC further stated staffing information should be posted daily. During an interview on 12/3/25 at 1:14 p.m. with Director of Staff Development/Infection Preventionist (DSD/IP), DSD/IP stated staffing information should be posted daily to show the residents and visitors the facility's compliance with staffing to provide care to residents. A review of the facility's policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-09-14 · tag F0848 — patternProvide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate education for the arbitration agreement (a facility document that designates a third party to resolve a dispute between others) for three out of 27 sampled residents (Resident 49,65 and 92) when the arbitration agreement they signed was not explained so they could understand. This failure had the potential for residents to not fully understand the agreement. Findings: An interview on 9/14/23 at 11:16 a.m. with Resident 49, he stated he could not remember if he signed the arbitration agreement and he was not aware what it was about. Resident 49 further stated, I don't know why anyone would sign the arbitration agreement. An interview on 9/14/23 at 11:30 a.m. with Resident 92, he stated he did not remember signing the arbitration agreement. Resident 92 further stated, he was not educated he had the right to revoke the form 30 days after he signed it. An interview on 9/14/23 at 11:51 a.m. with Resident 65, he stated he did not remember signing the arbitration agreement, and was not aware he had the right to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$15,593 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-09-14
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUDSON RIVER OPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/05/2021 |
| BAY BRIDGE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/05/2021 |
| SANDHU, HARKESH | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 06/01/2018 |
| ESPINOSA, RAUL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2023 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $865K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055493. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.