No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

North Pointe Care Center

500 Jessie Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95838 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 161 certified beds · (916) 922-7177 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0741, F0758)3 actual-harm citations$24,115 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (69) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $24,115 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-09)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
3946 Norwood Ave · (877) 665-4623 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.4 mi
4195 Norwood Ave · (916) 418-0322 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4211 Norwood Ave · (916) 993-4100 · Call to confirm hours
Park
600 Benton Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.1%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.5%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.6%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication3.8%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.2%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.6%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.0%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication16.1%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission12.6%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.0%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.182.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.801.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

31.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
82.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.45U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.27hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 82.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF31.3%CMS range 21.6–42.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.0%CMS range 5.7–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge82.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge84.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge62.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.3%CMS range 5.5–15.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.731.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.54
RN hours/ resident / day
0.64
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.50
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.69
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
37.7%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 161 beds and averages 155.1 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-09)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-13)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

69 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services and implement measures for the prevention of pressure injuries (painful wounds caused as a result of prolonged pressure or friction) for two of 37 sampled resident (Resident 4 and Resident 32), who were at risk for skin injuries when, Resident 4 obtained a skin tear (a traumatic wound of the top layer of skin) from the use of bolster (part of a mattress cover with raised foam edges on each side of the bed to prevent resident from rolling out of bed), did not implement interventions addressing use of bolster, did not document accurate assessments of the wound every shift as indicated by resident's care plan; and Failed to ensure pressure ulcer risk factors were thoroughly assessed, daily skin checks completed as indicated in the care plan, and interventions were implemented to prevent avoidable wound to Resident 32's elbow.These failures contributed to Resident 4's mid back skin tear progressing into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal and physical abuse by Resident 2 for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 2, who had a history of verbal threats struck Resident 1 in the face.This failure resulted in Resident 2 striking Resident 1 causing lacerations to Resident 1's eyebrow, nose and cheek, caused pain, and had the potential for Resident 1 to experience emotional distress.Findings:A review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 in May 2025 with multiple diagnoses which included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 8/11/25 indicated the resident was cognitively impaired (decline in mental ability).A review of Resident 1's care plan addressing cognitive impairment dated 9/25/25 indicated that resident had decreased ability to make self-understood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 4) from abuse when: 1. Resident 1 pulled Resident 2's walker causing him to fall, and 2. Resident 3 punched Resident 4 on the face during an altercation. These failures resulted in Resident 2 sustaining a right intertrochanteric fracture (broken hip bone) and underwent hip arthroplasty (a surgery to replace the broken hip bone with an artificial implant) and Resident 4 had the potential to experience physical injury and emotional distress. Findings: 1.A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility summer of 2024 with multiple diagnoses that included Dementia with agitation (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 6/20/24, indicated, he had severe cognitive impairment (problems with a person's ability to think, learn, remember, use judgement, and make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a medical order that tells healthcare providers what treatments a person does or does not want) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR- an emergency procedure that involves chest compressions and rescue breathing to a person whose heart has stopped beating) was initiated on Resident 1 despite Resident 1's documented orders to not perform CPR.This failure violated Resident 1's right to have their treatment choices respected and implemented.Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in early 2025 with diagnoses that included a brain tumor, heart failure, kidney failure with dependence on a machine to remove waste from the blood, and dementia.During a review of Resident 1's POLST form dated [DATE], the POLST indicated, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation [CPR]: If patient has no pulse and is not breathing. Do Not Attempt Resuscitation/DNR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from abuse for one of six sample residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was pushed to the floor by Resident 2.This failure resulted in Resident 1 landing on the floor and experiencing left hip pain.During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted January of 2025 with a diagnosis of Dementia (a decline in thinking, memory, reasoning and ability to make decisions).A review of Resident 1 Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) dated 3/3/25 indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment.A review of Resident 1's progress note, dated 2/6/25 indicated Resident 3 reported that Resident 1 got pushed by Resident 2. The progress note indicated Resident 1 was laying on his back and when Resident 1 started walking he verbalized his left hip area hurt. The progress note indicated the abuse coordinator was notified. A review of Resident 2's clinical record indicated Resident 2 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the Department as required by the regulations when one of six sample residents (Resident 1) was pushed to the floor by Resident 2.This failure to report allegations of abuse resulted in delay in conducting investigation by the Department. During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted January of 2025 with a diagnosis of Dementia (a decline in thinking, memory, reasoning and ability to make decisions).A review of Resident 1 Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) dated 3/3/25 indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment (moderate problems with thinking and memory).A review of Resident 1's progress note, dated 2/6/25 indicated, Per Resident 3, Resident 1 got pushed by Resident 2, when he came to a room and out of nowhere Resident 2 pushed Resident 1 to the floor. When staff approached because of screaming, Resident 1 was laying on his back. Resident 1 stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility residents were free from accident and safety hazards when a personal items (one broken pair of glasses, dentures, and hearing aides) cart was left unlocked in the hallway for a total census of 160.This failure had the potential for residents to access the cart without staff supervision. During an observation on 3/27/26 12:40 p.m. in hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER], the Personal Items cart was observed with three nursing staff present. The 3 nursing staff left the cart unlocked.During an observation on 3/27/25 at 12:45 p.m. at the personal items cart, the cart was unlocked and three residents were observed walking by the cart.During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/27/26 at 12:47 p.m. with Certified Nurse Assistant 1 (CNA 1), CNA 1 confirmed that she checked out resident dentures from the personal items cart. CNA 1 confirmed three nursing staff were present at the cart when CNA 1 left the cart after logging her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to report injuries of unknown origin (IUO) to the Department as required by the regulations for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was noted with a scald injury (a type of burn injury caused by hot liquids that causes damages to the skin and tissue) to his right hand of unknown origin/cause.This failure resulted in a delay of investigation by the Department.A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in June of 2024 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive irreversible brain disorder that destroys memory and thinking skills over time).A review of Resident 1's MDS (minimum data set - an assessment tool) dated 12/22/25 indicated Resident 1's score was NA indicating no cognition score could be determined.During an observation on 3/4/26 at 11:55 a.m. in the dining room area, Resident 1 was observed sitting up in his wheelchair with a bandage observed on his right hand.A review of Resident 1's physician order dated 2/27/26 indicated, .updated tx…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled, prepared, stored, served, or distributed in accordance with professional standards of food safety when:Kitchen utensils were stored wet in the clean and ready-to-use bin;unlabeled, undated, opened food items were found in kitchen area;metal pans were stacked wet at the clean and ready-to-use area;mislabeled food items were found in resident refrigerator in medication room; andunlabeled, undated food items were found in Resident 90's room.These failures increased the potential for food-borne illnesses among the census of 157 residents.Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 1/6/26 at 8:20 a.m., accompanied by the Dietary Manager (DM), there was a large bin labeled, Utensils with multiple wet kitchen utensils stored inside. 2a. During the initial kitchen tour on 1/6/26 at 8:25 a.m., an unlabeled container had a food product stored inside. 2b. During the initial kitchen tour on 1/6/26 at 8:30 a.m., a maple syrup container did not have an expiration date. 2c. During the initial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify trauma triggers for six out of 37 sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 9, Resident 29, Resident 113, Resident 93, and Resident 152) with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event) or identified traumatic events. This failure had the potential for the residents to experience re-traumatization (re-experience/relives a traumatic event or experiences causing similar stress reactions to a new event), and possible increased symptoms such as restlessness, irritability and social withdrawal. A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in December 2023 with multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke- death of brain tissue due to blockage of blood supply to the brain), vascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for a census of 157 when:1. Two facility staff did not wear required personal protective equipment (PPE) when transferring, assisting with personal care, and handling the foley catheter (a tube inserted through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine) for Resident 38 who was on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP- also known as enhanced standard precaution/ESP, infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs- bacteria that resist treatment with more than one antibiotic] that employs targeted gown and glove use);2. A clean resident's personal items delivery cart had a thick layer of dust on the inside surface;3. Staff did not wear PPE when transferring Resident 32 who was on EBP and when handling the foley catheter; 4. Resident 125's room did not have EBP sign posted outside the room for a resident who had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one out of 37 sampled residents' (Resident 42) right to be free from elderly financial abuse by a family member/legal representative when Resident 42 experienced financial abuse by her sister who was also her conservator (a court-appointed individual who manages the financial and/or personal affairs for someone unable to do so themselves).This failure resulted in Resident 42 experiencing financial abuse, and possible serious psychosocial harm.Findings:A review of Resident 42's clinical record indicated Resident 42 was admitted May of 2023 and had diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where the brain does not receive enough nutrients or oxygen to function properly, leading to altered brain function), dementia (memory loss that interferes with daily functions), and need for assistance with personal care.A review of Resident 42's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) Cognitive Patterns, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints (physical devices, or equipment that restricted resident movement or ability to get out of bed including bed rails) for one of 37 sampled residents (Resident 149), when the facility did not:Obtain a physician's order for the use of bed rails; 2. Obtain approval from resident or resident's representative (RP) for the use of bed rails; 3. Conduct bed rail assessment prior to placing the quarter side rails and, 4. Develop a care plan to mitigate the risks for entrapment (being caught in or trapped).These failures placed Resident 149 at increased risk for complications of restraint use such as decline in functioning and potential to cause physical harm from entrapment. Findings:A review of Resident 149's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 149 in 2023 with multiple diagnoses, which included Alzheimer's disease (disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 56 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures (P&P) for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of abuse in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for one out of 37 sampled residents (Resident 42) when Resident 42 was suspected for elderly financial abuse by her conservator (a court-appointed individual who manages the financial and/or personal affairs for someone unable to do so themselves) and was not reported to the state agency, local ombudsman, adult protective services, and law enforcement officials.This failure resulted in a delayed investigation of the suspicion of Resident 42's financial abuse and placed Resident 42 at risk of experiencing further financial abuse, and possible serious psychosocial harm.Findings:A review of Resident 42's clinical record indicated Resident 42 was admitted May of 2023 and had diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where the brain does not receive enough nutrients or oxygen to function…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures (P&P) for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of abuse in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for one out of 37 sampled residents (Resident 42) when Resident 42 was suspected for elderly financial abuse by her conservator (a court-appointed individual who manages the financial and/or personal affairs for someone unable to do so themselves) and was not investigated.This failure resulted in Resident 42 experiencing further financial abuse, and possible serious psychosocial harm.Findings:A review of Resident 42's clinical record indicated Resident 42 was admitted May of 2023 and had diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where the brain does not receive enough nutrients or oxygen to function properly, leading to altered brain function), dementia (memory loss that interferes with daily functions), and need for assistance with personal care.A review of Resident 42's Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update and revise resident's care plans (documents that summarizes resident's needs, goals, and care/treatment) for one of 37 sampled residents (Resident 4), after the physician discontinued orders for resident's splint (a device to immobilize joint) and fluid restriction (means limiting person's intake of liquids due to health conditions).These failures increased the potential to result in confusion in the delivery of care and services to Resident 4 and the resident continued to receive care and treatment that was discontinued. A review of the admission Record indicated that the facility admitted Resident 4 in 2015 with multiple diagnoses, which included metabolic encephalopathy (brain disfunction, leading to confusion, memory issues, and personality changes), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), muscle weakness, and contracture of muscle in right hand (a condition when tissue under the palm thickens and fingers are curled,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of 37 sampled residents (Resident 13 and Resident 146) were assisted with nail care as part of his Activities of Daily Living (ADLs- normal daily functions required to meet basic needs) when Resident 13 and Resident 146 had long fingernails with blackish substance underneath. This failure had the potential for Resident 13 and Resident 146 to sustain skin injury and/or to acquire an infection and not achieve their highest practicable well-being.Findings:1. A review of Resident 13's clinical record indicated Resident 13 was admitted March of 2026 and had diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care.A review of Resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) Cognitive Patterns, dated 12/15/25, indicated Resident 13 was rarely/never understood. A review of Resident 13's MDS Functional Abilities, dated 12/15/25, indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 37 sampled residents (Resident 38) received care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and facility's policy and procedure (P&P when Resident 38's foley catheter (a tube inserted through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine) bag was left on the floor.This failure had the potential for Resident 38 to develop infection and possible foley catheter complications.Findings:A review of Resident 38's clinical record indicated Resident 38 was admitted June of 2023 and had diagnoses that included dementia (memory loss that interferes with daily functions), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (the nerves and muscles in the urinary bladder don't work together properly), obstructive and reflux uropathy (occurs when the urine cannot drain through the urinary tract), retention of urine (caused by a blockage or a failure of the bladder to squeeze hard enough to expel all of the urine), catheter use, and muscle weakness.A review of Resident 38's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper handling and delivery of respiratory care consistent with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) and the professional standards of practice for 1 of 8 sampled residents when:Resident 130's oxygen tubing/nasal cannulas (a medical device connected to an oxygen source used to deliver supplemental oxygen directly into the airways) were not labeled with the date it was first used.This failure had the potential to result in unsafe and unsanitary delivery of oxygen to Resident 130.Findings:A review of Resident 130's clinical record indicated Resident 130 was admitted in June of 2025 and had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a group of diseases that causes airflow blockage and breathing-related problems) and muscle weakness.A review of Resident 130's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool used to guide care) Cognitive Patterns, dated 1/23/2130, indicated Resident 130 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess cognition) score of 10 out of 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food in accordance with the physician's prescribed diet for one out of 37 sampled residents (Resident 146) when Resident 146 who was on 2 gram (gm/g- unit of measurement) low salt diet (a dietary restriction that limits the intake of salt to 2 grams for the whole day) received a salt packet during the 1/6/26 lunch meal.This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 146's medical condition and for Resident 146 not to achieve his highest practicable well-being.A review of Resident 146's clinical record indicated Resident 146 was initially admitted August of 2024 and had diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where the brain does not receive enough nutrients or oxygen to function properly, leading to altered brain function), diabetes (elevated sugar in the blood), and hypertension (high blood pressure).A review of Resident 146's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) Cognitive Patterns, dated 11/17/25, indicated Resident 146 had a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and homelike environment was provided when horizontal blinds in three (room [ROOM NUMBER], 26 and 35) of 53 rooms were broken, for a census of 157. This failure had the potential to cause injury and unsafe condition to vulnerable residents residing in these rooms. During an observation conducted on 1/6/26 at 9:14 a.m., the horizontal blinds in room [ROOM NUMBER] were broken. There were 5 residents in this room. Further observation was conducted on 1/6/26 at 1:16 p.m., the horizontal blinds in room [ROOM NUMBER] had broken edges. There were 4 residents in this room. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 1/6/26 starting at 1:17 p.m., the ADON confirmed the blinds in room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] were broken. The ADON stated maintenance made rounds daily and the staff who found the broken blinds should write in the maintenance log. During an interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect one of four (4) sampled residents' (Resident 1) right to be free from physical abuse when a facility staff member pushed Resident 1 on his face causing him to fall on the ground. This failure resulted in an emergency hospital transfer of Resident 1 for further evaluation.Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in July of 2025 with diagnoses which included symptoms affecting memory, cognition, social abilities and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (ORS) indicated, Resident [Resident 1] does not have the capacity to make his/her decisions.A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (a standardized assessment tool used in nursing homes), dated 7/24/25, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment.A review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP), dated 7/25/25, indicated, Resident [Resident 1] involved in an accident where they became physically aggressive toward staff during care, striking staff in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from abuse, when Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) hit resident in the face causing face abrasions. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing unnecessary pain, fear, and mental anguish and had the potential to cause further psychosocial harm to the resident. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 in 2017 with multiple diagnoses which included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), anxiety, and schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought). A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 6/24/24, indicated a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status - an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 7, which indicated that the resident had a moderately impaired cognition. A review of the ' Altered Behavior ' care plan initiated 5/28/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote, maintain, and treat five of 37 sampled residents (Resident 77, Resident 119, Resident 44, Resident 21, and Resident 6) with respect and dignity when: 1. Resident 77 was not provided with privacy when receiving phone calls; 2. Resident 119's requests were ignored; 3. Residents were referred to as feeders and residents were not asked if they wanted to wear a bib during a meal; 4. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 6 was standing while feeding Resident 21 and 44; and 5. Resident 6 was not provided with privacy during medication administration. These failures increased the potential for residents not to be able to exercise their rights for privacy, to be treated with dignity and respect, and to receive the services and care necessary to maintain their highest possible mental, physical, psychological, and social well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 77's admission Record indicated he was admitted with diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment which include code status with instructions on what to do if the resident had no pulse and stopped breathing) forms were completed and updated when: 1. Two of 37 sampled residents' (Resident 3 and 44) POLST forms were not signed and completed; and 2. Two of 37 sampled residents' (Resident 104 and 111) code statuses were not updated in their EMR (Electronic Medical Record) after new POLSTs were put in place. These failures had the potential to result in the facility not acting in accordance with residents' wishes and following physician orders in the event of an emergency. Findings: 1a. During a review of Resident 3's facesheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) dated [DATE], it indicated Resident 3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], and the resident had a guardian/responsible party assigned. During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment was provided for three of 37 sampled residents (Residents 18, 41, and 74), when there were no clocks available in the residents' rooms. This failure increased the potential for the residents not attaining their highest practicable well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 18's admission records, the records indicated Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), mood disorder, and dementia (impaired memory). During a review of Resident 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 6/24/24, the MDS indicated Resident 18 had severe memory impairment. The MDS further indicated that it is very important for Resident 18 to do her favorite activities and choose her own bedtime. During a review of Resident 18's care plan initiated on 1/12/23, the care plan indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to adequately maintain pharmacy services for two out of a census of 156 when: 1. A controlled drug (medication that may be abused or cause addiction) destruction record log was inaccurate. 2. Two tablets of lacosamide (a medication given for seizures) were in one single dose unit of the medication card and not accounted for by the nursing staff. This failure had the potential to cause inaccurate accountability of controlled medications and the potential to result in diversion of the residents' medication. Findings: 1. During a review of the controlled drug destruction record log for three random resident's controlled drugs, 20 syringes of Lorazepam gel (a medication used for anxiety) was not recorded in the destruction record log. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/11/24 at 2:55 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), of the controlled medication storage in the DON's office, the DON verified that the 20 syringes of lorazepam were not documented and signed in the destruction log. The DON stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. A review of Resident 150's admission Record indicated Resident 150 was admitted in June 2024 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and thinking skills) and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Resident 150's MDS, dated [DATE] indicated, severe cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 150's clinical record included the following documents: A physician's order, dated 8/28/24, indicated an order for risperidone (an antipsychotic), 1 mg (milligrams, a unit of measurement)/1 ml (milliliter, a unit of measurement) solution, Give 0.5 mg by mouth one time a day. An MDS Section E, dated 6/25/24, indicated that Resident 150 had no potential indicators of psychosis. During a review of Lexicomp (a nationally recognized drug information resource) indicated, ALERT: US Boxed Warning .Risperidone is not approved for the treatment of patients with dementia-related psychosis. During a review of [manufacturer's name] full prescribing information for risperidone, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication administration error rate was less than five percent (%) when two medication errors occurred out of 29 opportunities during medication administration for two residents (Resident 6 and Resident 71) of five selected residents during medication pass. This failure resulted in medications not given in accordance with the physician's orders and potential to affect the residents' clinical conditions. Findings: A review of Resident 6's admission Record, Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in early 2023 with admitting diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes (a long term condition in which the body has trouble controlling sugar in the blood). Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 7/1/24 indicated, severe cognitive impairment. During a medication administration observation on 9/11/24 at 8:21 a.m., Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2) was observed preparing to administer Resident 6's insulin aspart (rapid acting injectable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 5 selected residents during medication pass (Resident 6) was free of significant medication errors when a licensed nurse administered insulin aspart, (short acting injectable medication used to lower blood sugar level) not in accordance with physician orders. This failure put the resident at risk for suffering adverse consequences from the medication. Findings: A review of Resident 6's admission Record, Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in early 2023 with admitting diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes (a long term condition in which the body has trouble controlling sugar in the blood). Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 7/1/24 indicated, severe cognitive impairment. During a medication administration observation on 9/11/24 at 8:21 a.m., Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2) was observed preparing to administer Resident 6's insulin aspart. During a medication administration observation on 9/11/24 at 8:30 a.m. LN 2 administered 2 units of insulin aspart to Resident 6. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and labeled, when: 1. Medications were not properly stored per manufacturer instruction, 2. Expired and discontinued medications were available for resident use, 3. Loose pills and loose medical supplies were found in the drawers and the back of medication cart and 4. Refrigerated medications were not stored in accordance with facility Policy & Procedure (P&P). These deficient practices had the potential for residents to receive medications with unsafe or reduced potency from being used past their expiration date or improper storage, and diversion or misuse of medications from not being securely stored. Findings: 1. During an inspection of medication cart B on 9/10/24 at 11:00 a.m. alongside Licensed Nurse 4 (LN 4), a bottle of Acidophilus (a supplement that promotes the growth of good bacteria) was found stored in the medication cart. LN 4 confirmed the finding and stated the medication should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review food storage, service and distribution were not completed in accordance with professional standards when: 1. Kitchen vents, fans, and floors were found dirty and/or dusty, 2. Worn food preparation equipment was kept in storage and not discarded when it could no longer be sanitized, 3. Foods in storage found expired, open to the environment, and/or improperly labeled, and 4. Kitchen staff were unable to demonstrate how to test for proper sanitation concentration levels. These failures had the potential to cause food borne illness for the 155 residents receiving facility prepared foods. Findings: 1a.) During the initial kitchen observation on 9/10/24 at 9:01 a.m., the vents in the kitchen ceiling had whitish-gray build-up on the ventilation slats (where air exists the heating and air conditioning unit). 1b.) During the initial tour and on follow up visits on 9/10/24, fans in the kitchen had visible build-up of dirt/dust. 1c.) During an inspection of the storage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. During a concurrent inspection of medication cart B and interview on 9/10/24 at 11:00 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 4, food items (a sandwich and an opened pudding) were found stored in the medication cart. LN 4 confirmed the finding and stated the food items should not be stored in the medication cart. LN 4 acknowledged that medication carts should only be used for medications. During a concurrent inspection of medication cart B and interview on 9/10/24 at 11:05 a.m. with LN 4, 3 nail clippers were identified and stored next to eyedrops. LN 4 confirmed the finding and stated that the nail clippers should be clean. LN 4 acknowledged that medication carts should only be used for medications. During an interview on 9/11/24 at 2:40 p.m. with the DON, the DON stated all food items should be in the ice bucket on top of the medication cart. DON further stated that nail clippers should not be stored in medication carts due to sanitary concerns. During review of the facility's P&P titled, Medication Storage in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of 37 sampled residents (Resident 119), who was observed with cold and allergy nasal spray at the bedside, was assessed and had an order to self-administer medication. This failure had the potential to result in overmedication for Resident 119 and exposed other residents to accidental access to the nasal spray. Findings: According to admission record, the facility admitted Resident 119 in August 2024 with multiple diagnoses which included chronic lung disease and anxiety. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment and care planning tool) dated 8/27/24, indicated Resident 119 was cognitively intact and had no memory problems. A review of Resident 119's clinical record contained a document titled, Nursing - Self-Administration of Medication Observation, dated 8/21/24 at 8:52 p.m. The document had the following question, Does resident want to self-administer medications? and the nurse who performed the assessment documented No. There was no further documented evidence indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the resident's right to privacy and confidentiality of personal and medical records for a census of 156 residents when computer screen that showed confidential personal and medical information was left unsecured. This failure had the potential to result in unauthorized access of residents' personal and medical information. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/10/24 at 10:58 a.m. in the hallway with the Wound Nurse (WN), a computer in medication cart B was observed open with resident clinical information including resident's picture, name, and medications displayed. Multiple residents and staff were also observed walking in the hallway. The WN came out of a resident's room and confirmed the observation and stated, It's a HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act - a federal law that protects sensitive health information from being disclosed without consent) violation, this is resident medical information. During an interview on 9/10/24 at 10:59 a.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and records review, the facility failed to ensure one of 37 sampled residents (Resident 119) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards and practice, when the facility did not follow up on resident's request for allergy medication for six days. This failure resulted in a delay of Resident 119's allergy medication. Findings: According to admission records, the facility admitted Resident 119 in August 2024 with multiple diagnoses which included chronic lung disease and anxiety. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment and care planning tool) dated 8/27/24 indicated Resident 119 was cognitively intact and had no memory issues. During an observation and interview on 9/11/24 at 8:15 a.m., Resident 119 was sitting on his bed, alert and pleasant. Resident 119 stated that sometimes facility staff ignored him and added, I have a severe allergy. Have been asking [nurses] for medication for days and they keep saying that doctor has not prescribed yet. A review of Resident 119's clinical record contained nursing progress note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 37 sampled residents (Resident 138) received necessary services to ensure proper grooming when Resident 138 had black material under her nails. This failure had the potential to cause infection to Resident 138 due to poor hygiene. Findings: A review of Resident 138's admission Record indicated Resident 138 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 with multiple diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory, problem solving, and thinking abilities). A review of Resident 138's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 8/5/24, indicated Resident 138 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess cognition) score of 5 out of 15 that indicated Resident 138 had severe cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 138's MDS, Functional Abilities and Goals, dated 8/5/24, indicated Resident 138 required moderate assistance for personal hygiene. During an observation on 9/11/24 at 9:37 a.m. of Resident 138, observed black material under Resident 138's fingernails.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to meet the needs and interests for one of 37 sampled residents (Resident 44) when the activities care plan was not followed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the resident's psychosocial well-being, self-worth and meaning in life. Findings: During a review of Resident 44's comprehensive MDS (Minimum Data Set, a clinical assessment tool) dated 2/19/24, the MDS indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS, a tool used to assess cognition (knowing, learning, and understanding things)] was not conducted due to Resident 44 was rarely/never understood. A staff assessment for mental status was performed which indicated Resident 44's Cognitive Skills for Daily Decision Making was severely impaired. It also indicated Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities: listen to music you like, do your favorite activities, and go outside to get fresh air when the weather is good were very important to Resident 44 per family or significant other. During a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care to maintain vision for one of 37 sampled residents (Resident 143), when Resident 143 was not sent to the hospital for an acute onset vision loss. This failure had the potential to cause deterioration of vision leading to increased fall risk and greater loss of independence. Findings: A review of Resident 143's admission Record indicated Resident 143 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with multiple diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory, problem solving, and thinking abilities), malignant neoplasm of endometrium (cancer in the lining of the uterus), and diabetes (too much sugar in the blood). A review of Resident 143's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 7/29/24, indicated Resident 143 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess cognition) score of 2 out of 15 that indicated Resident 143 was severely cognitively impaired. A review of Resident 143's SBAR [Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation] Communication Form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 37 sampled residents (Resident 38) received care and services in accordance with the physician order, when the staff failed to place the hand roll to the resident's right hand. This failure had the potential for Resident 38 to experience a further decline in use of her right hand and loss of ability to feed self independently, and result in skin breakdown. Findings: A review of Resident 38 admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident in 2016 with multiple diagnoses including muscle weakness. A review of Resident 38's Order Summary Report, dated 11/14/23, contained an active physician order for staff to apply a hand roll or soft cloth in her right hand every shift to prevent further contracture (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby tissues that causes the joint to shorten and become very stiff). A review of Resident 38's clinical record had no care plan addressing right hand contracture and the use of hand roll daily to prevent decline in her right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of six sampled residents (Resident 2) from abuse when the hospitality aide [HA] got upset and slapped Resident 2 on the cheek repeatedly. This failure had the potential to cause injury, fear and distress to Resident 2. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission record, Resident 2 was admitted in September 2023 with diagnoses that included dementia (loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning skills), depression (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and need for assistance with personal care. Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated Resident 2 had severe cognitive impairment, exhibited physical and other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others, and required supervision or touch cueing assistance while eating. During a review of Resident 2's care plan initiated on 11/30/23, the care plan indicated, The resident is/has potential to be physically aggressive amongst peers r/t Anger, Dementia, Depression, poor impulse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was implemented and monitored for effectiveness for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when there was no documented evidence Resident 1's hip protectors were applied as directed by the care plan to minimize the impact of falls. This failure decreased the facility's potential to minimize the serious consequences of falls for the resident. Additionally, Resident 1 had a witnessed fall and sustained a hip fracture. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission records, Resident 1 was admitted in [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia (loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning skills), protein calorie malnutrition (reduced availability of nutrients that leads to changes in body composition and function), and unsteadiness on feet. Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 1's progress notes dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was implemented and updated for one of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's ileostomy (a surgically created opening in the abdomen to allow waste to leave the body through a new skin opening called the stoma) bag was leaking. This failure resulted to increased redness and irritation to Resident 1's ileostomy site and surrounding skin. Findings: A review of the admission RECORD indicated Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including dementia (loss of ability to think, remember, and make decisions), Crohn's disease (causes swelling in the lining of the digestive tract), and ileostomy status. A review of Resident 1's physician's orders indicated the following: - Abdominal binder as resident allows was ordered on 6/23/23; and -update tx:Right Ileostomy dermatitis (inflammation of the skin) cleans skin with saline [NAME] guze (sic) only, avoided adhesive dressing, use hydrocolloid (waterproof dressing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the fluid intake for one of 8 sampled residents (Resident 8) was accurately monitored and communicated to the physician. This failure increased the potential for Resident 8 to experience signs of fluid overload (too much fluid in the body) such as swelling of the feet and weight gain. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 8 was admitted in 12/2023 with diagnoses including dementia (progressive decline affecting how a person thinks, behave and perform everyday tasks) with behavioral disturbance and chronic congestive heart failure (a heart condition that causes fluid buildup in the feet, arms, lungs, and other organs). A review of Resident 8's physician's orders indicated the following: - Fluid Restriction 2000 ml [milliliters, unit of measurement] or 2 liters per 24 hours [per day] dated 3/8/24; and - Fluid Restriction 1000 ml (1 Liter) per day dated 4/13/24. A review of Resident 8's electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) indicated the following fluid intake: - The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from mental abuse by facility staff for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when facility staff took a picture of Resident 1 with an unsecured facility cell phone while Resident 1 was lying the floor with his pants around his ankles, without undergarments, and trying to cover his naked buttocks with the edge of his nightshirt. This failure portrayed Resident 1 in an undignified manner and had the potential for multiple staff members, other residents and family members, to view the photograph, which could cause mental anguish to Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility mid-2024 with diagnosis which included Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), major depressive disorder, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, and anxiety disorder. Resident 1 was not his own responsible party (RP). During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (FS, a document that contains patient information), the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the responsible party (RP) and physician for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 had an unwitnessed fall, which resulted in bleeding and an injury to the lip. This failure delayed prompt medical monitoring, treatment and left the family unaware of the situation. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in mid-2024 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), major depressive disorder, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, and anxiety disorder. Resident 1 is not his own responsible party. During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (FS, a document that contains patient information), the FS indicated a family member was the RP. During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report [OSR], dated 7/2/24, the OSR indicated, Resident does not have the capacity to make his/her own decisions related to Alzheimer's. During a review of Resident 1's BRIEF INTERVIEW FOR MENTAL STATUS [BIMS], dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was monitored timely for neurological changes (injury or changes that result from an injury to the head that affect the brain) after an unwitnessed fall. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have neurological deterioration that was not assessed or monitored by staff. Findings: Resident 1 admitted to the facility mid-2024 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), major depressive disorder, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, and anxiety disorder. Resident 1 was not his own responsible party. During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (FS, a document that contains patient information), the FS indicated a family member was the responsible party (RP). During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes [PN], dated 6/15/24 at 10:00 a.m. the PN indicated, Called [name of after hour hospital service] for reporting Fall (sic) from last night . During a review of Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the representative or Responsible Party (RP) was informed of the skin discoloration for one resident (Resident 1), for a census of 155. This failure resulted in Resident 1's RP not being informed of the skin changes. Findings: A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that affects memory, thinking, and behavior) and Bipolar II disorder (pattern of depressive episodes [sadness or hopelessness] and hypomanic episodes [persistently elevated or irritable mood]). A review of Resident 1's 'Nurse's Note' dated 5/24/24 at 08:24, indicated, .RP was very [sic] expressing her concerns that [Resident 1] has bruises on her arm from wrist to her neck . This note was written by the Director of Nursing (DON). A review of Resident 1's '72-hour Charting' dated 5/23/24 at 16:46 [4:46 p.m.]' indicated, Body skin assessment done: Res [Resident 1] has scattered old purplish discoloration to bilateral forearms. Lt [left] forearm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to ensure safety for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when Resident 1 and Resident 2 had a verbal and physical altercation in the back yard. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a scratch on the cheek and Resident 2 had skin tear to left hand. Findings: A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that affects memory, thinking, and behavior) and Bipolar II disorder (pattern of depressive episodes [sadness or hopelessness] and hypomanic episodes [persistently elevated or irritable mood]). A review of Resident 1's SBAR [Situation, Background, Appearance, Review and Notify] dated 5/23/24, indicated, .Was told by staff that [Resident 1] had a verbal altercation with [Resident 2] that turned into physical altercation. [Resident 2] was yelling at the] [Resident 1] and pulled her hair and slapped her on the face. Staff was then able to separate residents away…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control standards of practice for Resident 1 when the indwelling catheter (tube placed into bladder to collect urine) bag was lying on the floor under resident's bed. This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent the spread of infection. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility early 2024 with diagnoses which included obstructive and reflux uropathy (a urinary tract disorder that causes obstructed flow of urine). A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report [OSR] dated 4/10/24, the OSR indicated, .Secure indwelling catheter tubing using anchoring device to prevent movement and urethral traction. A review of Resident 1's Care Plan Detail [CP], dated 2/18/24, revised 3/13/24, the CP indicated, The resident has an Indwelling [brand name of urinary catheter] .[resident] will have no complications or infections related to urinary device .will show no signs/symptoms of urinary infection through review date .ensure there is no dependent looping of catheter tubing. In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain nail care for one Resident (Resident 8) of eight sampled residents, when Resident 8's toenails were long, cracked and unevenly trimmed. This failure decreased the facility's ability to assist Resident 8 to reach his highest practicable level of well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 8's admission record indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in the summer of 2018 with diagnoses which included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions). A review of Resident 8's Care Plan, dated 6/6/23, indicated Resident 8 had activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to confusion and dementia. The care plan further indicated Resident 8 required ADL assistance by the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) staff. During an observation on 1/3/23 at 11 a.m. in Resident 8's room, Resident 8's toenails were long, uneven and had rough edges. During an interview on 1/3/23 at 11:10 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2), the CNA 2 confirmed Resident 8's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), when baseline care plan did not identify the resident as an elopement risk and there was no frequent monitoring and supervision included in the care plan interventions. This failure resulted in Resident 1 leaving the facility and not attaining his highest practicable well-being. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted in late 2023 with diagnoses which included unsteadiness of feet, lack of coordination, depression, and cognitive communication deficit. During a review of a document titled, Nursing - Elopement Risk Observation/Assessment, dated 11/20/23, the document indicated, If total score is greater than 10, the Resident would be considered to be At Risk for Elopement .The Resident has made 1 or more attempts in the last year. The Elopement Risk Score was 22. During a review of Resident 1's Nursing Care Plan (NCP) dated 11/20/23, the NCP indicated, Elopement: Resident is at risk for elopement/exit seeking related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide safety monitoring and supervision for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), when the resident jumped off the fence of the facility and has not been located. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1's harm, including accidents, falls and injuries. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted in late 2023 with diagnoses which included unsteadiness of feet, lack of coordination, depression, and cognitive communication deficit. During a review of a document titled, Nursing - Elopement Risk Observation/Assessment, dated 11/20/23, the document indicated, If total score is greater than 10, the Resident would be considered to be At Risk for Elopement .[Resident 1] is fully ambulatory .wanders aimlessly .has made 1 or more attempts in the last year. The Elopement Risk Score was 22. During a review of Resident 1's Nursing Care Plan (NCP) dated 11/20/23, the NCP indicated, Elopement: Resident is at risk for elopement/exit seeking related to history of elopement and unspecified depression .Allow wandering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to create a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 2 high risk elopement residents (Resident 1), when interventions to prevent elopement were not developed and implemented for Resident 1. These failures resulted in an avoidable elopement from a secured locked facility, (locked memory care units provide a place for residents with any type of dementia/memory problems to live safely, with increased supervision and support as their diseases progress), compromising the health and safety of Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record and a concurrent interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/24/23 at 12:30 p.m., the admission record indicated, Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, dementia (memory problems) with behavior disturbance, lack of coordination, and heart failure. In a concurrent interview with the DON, the DON stated Resident 1 was formerly living in an unsecured,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary supervision Resident 1 required to ensure his safety when Resident 1 eloped from the facility's Behavior Intervention Monitoring Program Room (BIMP, a program designed to provide supervision of specific behaviors which are based on an evaluation from a psychiatrist). This failure resulted in Resident 1's elopement and increased the potential for physical injury and psychosocial harm to Resident 1 during his unsupervised time away from the facility. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 with diagnoses which included dementia (a loss of memory and problem-solving abilities which interfere with daily life), generalized muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and a lack of coordination. This admission record also indicated Resident 1 was not his own Responsible Party (RP). A review of Resident 1's discharge paperwork upon admission to the facility from the hospital included a history and physical note from the hospital, dated 2/12/23, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were adequately trained and had competency skill sets to provide services to ensure the safety of one of two residents, (Resident 1), when Resident 1 had signed out of the Behavioral Intervention Monitoring Program (BIMP) room, had no supervision, and eloped the locked facility. This failure had the potential for more than minimal harm for one of two residents, (Resident 1), when an unsupervised elopement occured in a locked facility by Resident 1. Findings: During a review of the admission record for Resident 1 on 8/24/23, the record indicated, Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses including, dementia (memory problems) with behavior disturbance, lack of coordination, generalized muscle weakness, confusion, and heart failure. During a review of the original admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-assessment tool) on 8/24/23 at 11 a.m. for Resident 1, the record was dated 4/19/23, and indicated, Resident 1 required supervision with bed mobility, transfers, grooming and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment when one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) did not have adequate supervision and had two falls in three months. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing head injuries that possibly caused a subdural hematoma [a pool of blood between the brain and its outermost covering] necessitating a hospital stay. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (disease that destroys memory and other mental functions), chronic kidney disease (loss of function of the kidneys, do not filter the blood the way they should), and diabetes (too much sugar in the blood). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 6/26/23, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess cognition) score of 0 out of 15 that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-07-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to fully establish and implement an infection prevention and control (IPC) program for a census of 108 residents when: 1. There was no documented evidence of an IPC plan; 2. There was no documented evidence of a system of active infection surveillance for all types of infections in the facility to prevent the occurrence or spread of infections; 3. There were no investigations into the potential causes or contributing factors of facility-acquired infections; and, 4. There was no documented evidence of a system for process surveillance used to develop the facility assessment and IPC plan. These failures increased the potential for residents to have acquired infections that could have caused significant pain and discomfort, and could have had significant adverse consequences. Findings: During an interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP, person designated by the facility to be responsible for the IPC program) on 7/7/21, at 2:45 p.m., when asked about the facility-specific IPC plan (a plan designed to prevent,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-09 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Resident 96 and Resident 4) out of a sample of 33 were treated with respect and dignity when: 1a. A Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, without notifying Resident 96 beforehand, removed Resident 96's covers exposing him; 1b. A Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) pulled Resident 96 in his recliner chair from behind into his room, and fed him his dinner while standing over him from behind; and, 2. Staff gave Resident 4 a wash basin to store his belongings instead of providing the resident a nightstand. These failures resulted in Resident 96 and Resident 4 receiving undignified care and had the potential to negatively effect their psychosocial well-being. Findings: Review of a facility policy titled Resident Rights, dated 12/16, indicated, Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. 1. Review of Resident 96's admission Record indicated he admitted to the facility in March of 2018. A Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 17) in a sample of 33 had an environment that was free from hazards when staff left a pool of urine on the floor under Resident 17's bed with an electrical cord running through it. This failure had the potential to result in an accident leading to potential harm. Findings: During an observation of Resident 17 on 7/6/21, at 10 a.m., there was a smell of urine coming from Resident 17's room. Resident 17 was sitting in a wheelchair between his bed (Bed B) and his roommate's bed (Bed C, Resident 44) with his eyes closed. There was a pool of clear liquid under Bed B that reached out from under the bed to the left side of the bed. The electrical cord that powered the low air loss mattress pump on Bed B lay in the pool of liquid and was connected to the electrical outlet. Resident 44 was sitting in a chair in the hallway outside of their room. During a concurrent observation and interview with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 and CNA 4 on 7/6/21, at 10:15 a.m., in Resident 17's room, CNA 1 and CNA 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-09 · tag F0917 — isolated
    Make sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide basic furniture to meet the needs of one resident (Resident 4) in a sample of 22 when Resident 4 did not have a nightstand to store his personal items. This failure resulted in Resident 4 storing his items in a plastic wash basin on the floor. Findings: Review of Resident 4's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility in the Spring of 2021. A Minimum Data Set (MDS, a nursing assessment tool), dated 3/26/21, indicated Resident 4 required supervision with mobility and activities of daily living (eating and toileting). During an observation of Resident 4's room on 7/6/21, at 10:40 a.m., Resident 4 was sitting in a chair next to his bed. There was no nightstand next to Resident 4's bed. On the floor next to him were his shoes and a rectangular, plastic wash basin, which contained Resident 4's personal items. During a concurrent observation and interview with CNA 1 on 7/6/21, at 10:50 a.m., CNA 1 confirmed Resident 4 did not have a nightstand for his personal belongings. CNA 1 stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, six out of 53 rooms (Rooms 15, 16, 22, 23, 24, and 25) had more than four residents in each room. This failure had the potential to impact resident's care and privacy.During the Entrance Conference with the Administrator (ADM) on 1/6/26 starting at 8:17 a.m., the ADM stated the facility will renew existing room waiver (specific regulatory flexibility) to have more than four residents in six rooms (Rooms 15, 16, 22, 23, 24, and 25). During a review of the facility letter, dated 1/6/26, the letter indicated six rooms would accommodate more than four residents per room. The letter further indicated, These rooms all provide adequate space for resident care, storage, as well as privacy. During multiple observations conducted on 1/6/26 starting at 8:45 a.m., there were 5 residents in rooms 22, 23, 24, and 25. The beds were separated with privacy curtains, and each resident had bedside table. During multiple observations and interviews conducted on 1/6/26 starting at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, two out of 53 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and 16) did not meet the minimum requirement of 80 square feet (sq ft; unit of measurement) per resident.This failure had the potential for residents in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] to not have enough space for care and privacy which could impact the residents well being. During an initial tour of the facility on 1/6/26, starting at 9:01 a.m., rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were observed to have six beds in each of the rooms. During observation, the rooms were uncluttered, residents were able to move in and out of the rooms, and there was enough space for beds, wheelchairs, side tables, and other residents' care equipment.During an interview on 1/6/26 at 9:01 a.m. with Resident 117 in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 117 stated he was okay with his room and has enough space for him and when staff are taking care of him. Resident 117 further stated he had no concerns about having 5 other residents in the room.During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, six of 53 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 16, 22, 23, 24, and 25) accommodated more than four residents in each room. Findings: During a review of the facility's 'Approval of Program Flexibility for FLEX -7612' letter, dated 2/25/2024, provided by the Administrator (ADM), the letter indicated that two rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) had six beds each and rooms 22, 23, 24, and 25 had five beds each. The letter indicated, Even though we will have more beds in the rooms, the staffing ratio will continue to be scheduled based on patient acuity .there will be no decline the amount of care or attention the patients are receiving. During a review of the facility's census, dated 9/9/2024, the census indicated room [ROOM NUMBER], 16, 22, 23, 24, and 25 had more than four beds in each room. During a tour of the facility on 9/10/24, commencing at 9:10 a.m., multiple observations of the rooms containing more than 4 residents per room were made. Each of the beds had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, two of 53 resident rooms (15 and 16) did not meet the minimum requirement of 80 square feet (sq ft; unit of measurement) per resident. Findings: During a tour of the facility on 9/11/24, commencing at 9:10 a.m., the observations were made and the rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were observed to have six beds in each of the rooms. During an observation, the rooms were uncluttered, residents were able to move in and out of the rooms, and there was space for beds, wheelchairs, side tables, and other residents' care equipment. During a concurrent observation and interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 8) on 9/11/24 at 9:15 a.m., CNA 8 stated there was sufficient space in room [ROOM NUMBER] to give personal care and respond to emergencies. CNA 8 stated the residents were all ambulatory with minimal or stand-by assist and none of the residents required a mechanical lift machine. During an interview on 9/11/24 at 3:10 p.m., CNA 9 stated he had been assigned to room [ROOM NUMBER] for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, six resident bedrooms (rooms 15, 16, 22, 23, 24, and 25) accommodated more than four residents per room. Findings: During an initial tour of the facility on 2/20/24 at 10:20 a.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the following rooms were observed to contain more than 4 residents per room: room [ROOM NUMBER] - had 6 assigned residents room [ROOM NUMBER] - had 6 assigned residents room [ROOM NUMBER] - had 5 assigned residents room [ROOM NUMBER] - had 5 assigned residents room [ROOM NUMBER] - had 5 assigned residents room [ROOM NUMBER] - had 5 assigned residents During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/20/24 at 10:39 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER], there were six residents assigned to room [ROOM NUMBER]. Five beds were occupied and one of the residents was out of the room. One of the residents in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 1, stated that he had adequate space in the room. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/20/24 at 10:44 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER], there were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, two resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) did not meet the minimum requirement of 80 square feet (sq ft- unit of measurement) per resident. Findings: A concurrent observation and interview were conducted on 2/20/23 at 10:23 a.m. with the Maintenance Director (MDR). Room measurements of rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were taken. Observations were started in room [ROOM NUMBER] where six residents were assigned and there were six beds present. Five beds were occupied and one of the residents was out of the room. There was a facility staff in the room assigned as sitter for one of the residents. There was a wide space from the door to the middle of the room. There were plenty spaces for residents to freely move in the room and around their bed. The room was clean and uncluttered and no large equipment was blocking any space. The MDR ran a tape measure from the entrance door to the window on the opposite wall and measured 29.4 feet long, and then from the closet door to the opposite wall and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2021-07-09 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, six resident bedrooms (rooms 15, 16, 22, 23, 24, and 25) accommodated more than four residents per room. Findings: During an initial tour of the facility on 7/6/21 at 9 a.m , the following rooms were observed to contain more than 4 residents per room: Room 15 - 5 residents 16 - 5 residents 22 - 5 residents 23 - 5 residents 24 - 5 residents 25 - 5 residents During an observation and concurrent interview on 7/6/2021 at 9:30 a.m., five of the six beds in room [ROOM NUMBER] were occupied by residents. One of the residents of room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 70 stated that he had adequate space in his room. During an interview on 7/6/21 at 9:45 a.m., Certified Nurse Assistant 5 (CNA 5) stated he was assigned to room [ROOM NUMBER] as a sitter and that he had enough space to work with each resident in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. During an observation on 7/6/21 at 9:50 a.m., six beds were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Resident 68 was sitting in a wheelchair watching a movie. CNA 6 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2021-07-09 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, three resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) did not meet the 80 square feet (sq ft) minimum requirement per resident. Findings: An observation was conducted on 7/7/21 at 4:30 p.m., with the Director of Maintenance (DM). Room measurements of rooms [ROOM NUMBER] were taken at this time. Observations were started in room [ROOM NUMBER], where four beds were present. There appeared to be plenty of room to walk around each bed and in the middle of the room. The room was clean and uncluttered and no large equipment was blocking any area. A tape measure was run from the window to the door way on the opposite wall which measured 21 feet long, and then from the closet door to opposite wall which measured 17.33 feet wide. Next, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed and there were six beds with five residents and one staff member present in the room. There appeared to be plenty of room to move about. room [ROOM NUMBER] was free from large equipment and there was plenty of space for residents to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$24,115 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $24,115 — penalty dated 2026-01-09
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-02-07 for 3 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-07 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CAPITAL SNF HOLDING COMPANY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/30/2023
PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/30/2023
XIONG, GLENIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2017
COCKETT, JUDDIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/05/2023
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$22.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.5M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 8%Medicare 24%Other / private 68%

This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$394per resident / day
operating cost
$11,967per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$428per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555400. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next